I dont get it why the downgrade cant they just put a pc melting extra super ultra mode... or follow the crisis route ... or a special collectors edition high detail ... pc melting copy out there .... just for the games, gamers and arts sake ..... they are perfectly capable of showing us a treat then why dont they use it ? Fuck
@@hemantsarthak I don't think they make all the game with graphics like the trailer ones, just to trash everything and downgrade it. I think they just improve the graphics on certain parts they will show and then they downgrade that parts to be in point with the rest of the game
I remember when I first saw the E3 presentation of Watch Dogs I was just stunned, I couldn't believe such a game was possible at that time. Turns out, it wasn't possible...
That’s why I stopped watching E3 after a while since it was just a bunch of lies regardless of what company presented their product. What’s the point of getting excited for something if they always under deliver compared to the presentations. Wait for reviews and player feedback ignore reviewers that are paid by publishers.
If you get the Watch Dogs Legion season pass, it will include a remastered version of Watch Dogs 1. It looks absolutely stunning like the trailers but better with the PS5 graphics. I was very impressed.
It's useless to remove detail like that. It also wouldn't be shit on a gameplay perspective. The other plays know that the drones are gonna show up anyways. The trailer looks fluent smooth and the final product looks stiff and PS2 like. Still a good game but not what we paid for
its a fake hostage the storyline of r6 is that its a training operation, they changed the storyline since the trailer it was supposed to be a pve based game
Holy shit the fake chat/banter between teammates always drove me crazy. They are almost telling you that this is a performance instead of the real thing
I’m not too fussed over it in the trailers, as they are supposed to be promotional videos, like adverts on your TV, but what I will say it is super unrealistic, like RB6 Siege chatter is nothing like that, In reality the game has a super toxic playerbase and people trash talk SO much, and if you don’t play the way somebody in the game wants you too (cause he believe he knows better) he votes to kick you and rages at you... that’s real chatter
@@jimmydarm watchdogs was one of the first games for the ps4 and Xbox one…. They advertised what they were working on at the time… but when push came to shove, the consoles couldn’t handle as much as they originally predicted… so the had to lower the graphics a bit to make the game run smoother.. it doesn’t take a genius to figure it out… and the game was still awesome and had really good graphics for the time….
These aren’t true comparisons, he didn’t even try to match time of day or DO THE ACTUAL MISSIONS! Of course it’s going to look different. There is no downgrade then or today
@Alex Williams lol what? Yes, some are different times of day but the effects aren't there at all. I guess you are technically correct because they're pre-rendered so you can't downgrade a render. But the end product was a downgrade from the presented product.
@@1Guason3 I guarantee the effects are there if you wait for time of day or go to a drain pipe that’s steaming. Division world is always going you just hop in(division actually has way more detail then this trailer). That police station I was going in the lock up area, the fitness, and the lieutenant’s office. In watchdogs just wait for rain, dusk, and the coffee shop to be populated it looks exactly the same. This is BS. You can make any game look this bad.
@Alex Williams I can't speak for the division. But I can speak for R6 and FC. I've seen those two plus more from UBI get downgraded. I love ubi, but I will never backup a studio that doesn't maintain its track record.
@@alexwilliams4729 Lol no. Watch Dogs literally has the E3 graphics settings hidden away, you can enable them on the PC version with a mod. Minus a few effects that were never implemented at all. But PS4 couldn't support that so was all stripped back. Division is just lifeless in the release version, all that movement and life in the environment is gone. Completely different map menu, numerous closed off areas from the demo. Plus the combat was completely faked.
Lighting is even more important than texture quality, in my opinion, the thing is, a good looking, dynamic lighting, is difficult to make and heavy to support, that’s why most games have pale lighting, but never forgetting the hd textures, of course :/
@@artyom8905 Look at RE7, for example. Game has really horrible textures for many things, but the lighting and atmosphere literally makes it unnoticeable. Same goes for something like the BioShock trilogy for last gen
@SP he was stating that people dont normaly use the phrase 'brace for pvp' which leads me to believe the voice acting is very forced. take the stick out your ass buddy
I recently re-played FC3 as I loved it when it first came out but the lack of a real jungle in the game really took me out of the experience. I think the environment of FC2, for example, aged better than 3, but that the story kinda makes up for it.
Because it isn’t, the trailers are so unrealistically good looking. All of the games in this video are good, but they were showed in an unrealistic way, every company does this, I don’t know why people only point out Ubisoft “downgrades”.
Watch dogs 1 was actually a playable build demo, but it’s just a demo. When compared they’d have to add the same finesse and scripting level to every mission to meet the expectations the trailer gave. I still love watchdogs 1 but man I wish they put more love into it. Not saying they didn’t put love it’s a well done game but missed the expectation mark the trailer gave
The game _never_ had the E3 lighting, I remember playing it on launch and it looked nothing like the E3 trailers did, nor did it play like the trailers did, the trailers didnt even advertise it as a Counter-Strike style game lol. It's totally different visually now to the way it was on launch yes but the launch version of the game did not look at all like the E3 advertising.
Whenever I die I scream the room I died in, from, and then where I saw the guy shoot me from. "I DIED IN BATHROOM FROM SPIRAL" just because I have about four brain cells to make a phrase with.
The way the division looked compared to how it is, is such a soul crusher I love the division but seeing how it was supposed to be or the intended version is crushing
@@kvlrr5437 Is zero hour multiplayer because I would love to get an actual tactical team shooter rather than unemployed 30 year-old men screaming at me because I picked a character in a videogame
@@hazart8909 It is a pvp multiplayer game. If you want a tactial team shooter i recommend Ready Or Not. Its up on steam for $40. You and up to 4 friends can go into a swat scenario to rescue hostage and/or defuse bombs in an allotted time frame. The only one with a timer is the bomb defusal one. You got to take everything slow, cam snake the doors, slowly peek a door incase there is a tripwire trap that will kill you and possibly your whole team, and you got to keep an eye on the hostages since they could be one of the bad guys in disguise.
@@hazart8909 Although Zero Hour did add a pve mode to the game kind of recently. The animations look a bit jank though from the videos that is on the steam page
r6 dialougue in the trailer: "theres a guy at your 6 watch out!!'' r6 dialougue in multiplayer: "lol just threw a grenade at the hostages face and he died lmao"
r6 dialougue in the trailer: "there is a guy at your 6 watch out!!" r6 dialougue in reality: "There is a guy!" "where??" "there!!" "WHERE!?!" "THERE!!" *gets killed* "told you."
Blows my mind that this isnt illegal. Especially in cases like Watch Dogs and The Division. And even though this video is 7 years old this stuff still happens today on a giant scale with AAA games. Hopefully at some point they will start being held accountable in a legal sense.
As annoying as it is getting bait-and-switched by devs (*cough* Cyberpunk), people neglect to mention the times where there are actually valid reasons for it, or the direction/vision for the game changes. Many of these changes are for the sake of practicality, playability, and performance, not just because they couldn't be arsed following through. I agree, though, that it's wrong to set everyone's expectations in the sky, only to deliver something phenomenally waist-height lol One example of changes for valid(ish) reasons, is R6 Siege. It started off as a multiplayer tactical FPS, but its development and future went in the direction of COMPETITIVE multiplayer tactical FPS. When a game becomes competitive, it can't be an absolute graphics blunderbuss and obliterate anyone's PC that isn't worth at least £3k/$3k, the graphical bar has to be dropped, which means less dynamic lighting/shadows and replacing all that with baked in shit, simpler animations and animation blending, calmer particle effects, and also less/simpler player animations for the sake of smooth and functional gameplay, most of the shit that makes an E3 demo look so good... nobody is wishing CS:GO had cover mechanics and inverse kinematics or locked in animations for running up and down stairs because it'd make it a bit of a Jankfest and greatly hinder the competitive gameplay aspect. There's almost no excuse for single player games however, that shit just fucking boils my piss. Devs need to stop fucking around and mugging idiots off and idiots need to stop supporting their scummy antics and repeatedly buying the same piles of trash from the same scammers... EA Sports, EA Games, Bethesda. Primarily, the devs need to realise that without them, their publishers are basically nothing. If all the dev teams told publishers to stuff it when they're asked to make a 2 year project in 6 months, rather than bending over backwards to push unfinished shit, publishers would calm down and back off a bit, but I guess that's the problem. A dev team says they can't do it in that too-short-a-time, so the publishers just go "aight" and go find a different dev team that are happy to rob the first team's opportunity, even if that means churning out unfinished dogshit. Fuck me, that's balled me off a bit lol, why does every company have to be scummy as fuck. Sorry for the rant :)
Actually I like Ubi games, but I'm not buying everything and not in pre-order. I like two last Splinter Cells, I like Far Cry 3 and 4, Ghost Recon Future Soldier and of course I like The Division. Downgrading it is not a problem for me, games cause I'm not excited with graphics in trailer but with game features showed in trailer. And they never gave me up.
Yea, they have even changed features ingame... see watch dogs AI and weather and again see rainbow six and its destructibility. They have nerfed both games in features! I think you need to rewatch the video, because we don't speak only about graphic at all.
Important to showcase such examples of a downgrading "development". The gaming industry needs that kind of feedback as a mirror for the community, gamers and in conclusion their customers. That RUclips channel is pure bliss in that regard - and often comedy gold. 😅 Thanks for this content! 👌
I can forgive releases not looking 100% like the E3 demos, but it's criminal what some of these games look like after years of "updates and changes" (R6 mainly)
10:20 "You can be attacked from above for the first time in a Far Cry game". Far Cry 1 had helicopters... that would fly above you... and attack you... First time my ass.
I'd call it anything but funny. It's pathetic to say the least. I think the marketing people at Ubisoft really think that their customers are stupid enough to believe all this farce. It's insulting.
Climatic Hawk come on its a cinematic build of the game half the time they aren't even playing it just runs on a PC and they stand there with a controller.
What is it with Ubisoft writing the most cringe ass in game voice chat dialogue in the world, like wtf? it's not even just the unrealism, just the fact they chose the most cringeworthy lines and edit it in a way that when one says something, the other guy would immediately respond, like c'mon now.
@@Hadouken5150 it’s not just the graphics though even the level design and sound design and animation is different like in that Tom Clancy game there isn’t even that area that they went through in the trailer and in far cry the anima on on the face looks worse and when they fall into the water the sound design is bad so instead of there being drowning noises that make it more full of action it’s oddly quiet
QRPYWRPY you obv have never played rainbow because there is no mods. The map is on night and the helicopter got taken out of the game so ofc there will be no lighting
Idk why but even though it's goofy and cringey it has its certain charm. I prefer this style of presentation to the new slideshow ass presentation where they list every mundane feature ever instead of showing and show like a minute of "gameplay"
Here I go being art snobby again... Personally I prefer the presentation version. Graphically it tied FC3 back to the previous 2 games and would've taken some of the edge off. For Vaas it offered a more striking silhouette, he wasn't just a pirate with a face scar, he had bugged out restless eyes, and thick black hair that contrasted well with both his own head and the background. The old told you exactly who Vaas is before he ever spoke a word, and made him visually as special as his personality was. Retail better fits the "in" style at the time, realism, which looks "better" in terms of looking more like real life, but it looses some of the visual character in the process and makes it blend with games that came afterward. Sure the cut and more realistic appearance makes Vaas more imtimidating, but also made him visually forgettable in an ongoing era of grizzled soldiers with face scars in every, damn, shooter. At least it's better than either of the two styles currently "in", Cartoon Neon and Realistic Minimalism.
@@Halopen94 spiderman woulda look like plastic wrap if they kept the original look that you guys cried about insomniac did a side by side view of the 2 chararcter models and thats just one case of that
Trailer: particles, effects, reflections, dynamic lighting, full color gradiation, and physics everywhere. Ton of NPCs walking around and dynamic animations Game: All of the above nearly gone and colors look flat
eeeeeeh to be honest, i prefer the autistic version, because they wont tell the enemys your drone is nearby or anything. in general, im pretty okay with the fact that rainbow is how it is and not like the trailer, if all those shadows would be there, sure it would look nice but then it also would be waaaaay harder to spot enemys on the ground, just think of rook or caveira lying down in a dark spot, no chance you´re gonna see them before they see you. lastly, i just think they should present games how they are and not how they look the best at first glance.
Tendō Pain in fact,it would have required huge pc powers,which is bad for a competetive shooter,but it would have been really much more realistic,which is good !
It's not even that the final product is bad, it's just that we were lied to so enormously that regardless of how good the end product was it was never going to live up to expectations
@@TheJohn_Highway every far cry after 3 is trash? bit of a stretch 4-5 are not that terrible, new dawn is garbage and 6 is mid at best. Watch Dogs 1 is trash?
the rainbow 6 once still got me because when that girl is sniping outside of the house you know for a fact the entire time the team would be saying "what the fuck you doing, group up with team"
Man, I remember before the Division came out that I pointed out this exact same thing on that E3 trailer and got crapped on by everyone in comments. :/ Great to know that there are other sane people on the web.
The perfect dub from professional voice-actors make the games stink of the corporate smell. The average gamer always have shitty headphone mics, swears half of the time and rarely work with his teammates.
That E3 reveal was one of the best I've ever seen, I have yet to be as hyped for a game as I was for TD. I remember how buggy and hackable it was when it was first released too, just bad. The funny thing is I still play it lol, it's still a unique game. It could have been an all-time great.
@@jacobf7409 it doesn't just look like shit, it's also boring and brings absolutely nothing new to the table. At this point who even cares about realistic graphics. I just want to see something with a well written, believable story with gameplay elements that aren't obviously just copy-paste jobs from title to title.
@@ceetee110 the division is never about story, its about gameplay and rpg. if you want story and an easy game where you dont have to beat the enemy to death i have no idea why you would ever buy the division. didnt everyone already know the division is the dark souls of fps game? the gameplay isnt bad either even though it is console focused in pc the controls are very smooth
The funniest thing for me is how they always show the „perfect“ Multiplayer Teammates and how they all work together. We all know that they‘re all just screaming into the mic and rampaging through the levels
@@WoofyMcDoodle The biggest joke is the hostage I downloaded the game to save a vulnurable life like hostage not an ugly ass old man who's gonna die in a few years
Can we appreciate this man's dedication to being able to edit a cohesive video and maintain a storyline/theme with only the magic of editing. Zero words.
@@EricToTheScionti I think he’s referring to the E3 trailers in this video about AI talking which it weren’t implemented into the retail one. Compare that to Counter Strike Source and Global Offensive, bots communicate in certain quotes.
Rainbow Six Siege E3: Players drop down from a helicopter into a suburban neighborhood with dramatic nighttime lighting as the surrounding area is heavy with fog lit by streetlights. Rainbow Six Siege Actual Gameplay: BROWN
@This Ain’t Joker im not reffering to the bugs but the orange filter especifically on the fort if you fast travel to another place you can see the exessive filter
It's obviously not gonna look just like the trailers. That shouldn't mean it's gonna look terrible (hopefully it doesn't look Odyssey character model terrible though)
One thing I’ve consistently noticed Ubisoft games struggling with is Lighting and Shading. Textures are good, sure, but proper lighting carries graphics better well beyond a game’s prime.
@@beaners1234life Because ID are some of the best developers in the industry. But also many games in the 7th Gen didn't have superrealistic shadows or real-time dynamic lighting, and they cheated the system a bit which improved performance. 8th Gen consoles had awful, horrible CPUs which meant that dynamic lighting could still be achieved (not well, as the GPUs also sucked) but physics were absolutely screwed.
@@nono7117 They outright lie about their game quality, they are manipulative. If you want people to buy your game, don't lie to them about what it'll end up like. They could leave the graphics in E3 in there on some extra special setting and force everyone to by default use the lower preset therefore they are not responsible for players devices having trouble running it.
I remember The Division being the last game I was genuinely excited for. One of the main things I couldn’t get over was how good the map looked in the “gameplay trailer”. Once it came out I made an official vow to never get excited for a video game again
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
The difference is so big it looks like a game and a remaster.
Even Ubisoft remasters are bad, but I can’t say a Watch_Dogs remaster with the E3 graphics wouldn’t be great.
@@CenoriaWoah Imagine if it came with that physics shown at e3
honestly the far cry games look fine
They keep the upgraded versions safe and sound in the studio so they can sell them to you in 8 years
@@carhighh yep the only good ubisoft franchies with watch dogs
It's so funny whenever the real game is shown it has awkward silence.
Chad x almost as if you should soak up the fuck up that happened
Shits hilarious
makes me *XDDDD*
Trailer: aight so EPIC BANG BANG WOOOOO
Reality: ... uhhh am I supposed to do something...?
I think its because they added ambiance in the fake one
Did i ever tell you the definition of downgrade?
-Ubisoft
yakamozsun sen Thanks Xbox
I dont get it why the downgrade cant they just put a pc melting extra super ultra mode... or follow the crisis route ... or a special collectors edition high detail ... pc melting copy out there .... just for the games, gamers and arts sake ..... they are perfectly capable of showing us a treat then why dont they use it ? Fuck
@@jacobisaacs600 Thanks consoles*
@@hemantsarthak sometimes the higher graphics options are hidden in the .ini files. i literally cant think of any reason why this is the case.
@@hemantsarthak I don't think they make all the game with graphics like the trailer ones, just to trash everything and downgrade it. I think they just improve the graphics on certain parts they will show and then they downgrade that parts to be in point with the rest of the game
"Footage may not represent final product" Ubisoft lawyer's favorite sentence
This shouldn't be legal.
anything that isnt a big game dev would be sued for misleading conduct :|
it isnt. this would count as false advertising
Sadly they get away with it by saying "This is not a representation of the final product"
Mad Soldier i see you in alot of youtube videos
...well I mean, that's completely fair then isn't it?
I remember when I first saw the E3 presentation of Watch Dogs I was just stunned, I couldn't believe such a game was possible at that time. Turns out, it wasn't possible...
same. good thing i never preorder
That’s why I stopped watching E3 after a while since it was just a bunch of lies regardless of what company presented their product. What’s the point of getting excited for something if they always under deliver compared to the presentations. Wait for reviews and player feedback ignore reviewers that are paid by publishers.
The funny thing is that it actually was possible. The graphics files were located in the game but was deactivated.
If you get the Watch Dogs Legion season pass, it will include a remastered version of Watch Dogs 1. It looks absolutely stunning like the trailers but better with the PS5 graphics. I was very impressed.
disappointing yeah.
Trailer: R6 hostage asks the drone for help and actually acts like a scared hostage
Game: •_•
I mean, it's much better to have bots who are killed all the time show no emotion
From a gameplay prospective, that would be shit.
It's useless to remove detail like that. It also wouldn't be shit on a gameplay perspective. The other plays know that the drones are gonna show up anyways. The trailer looks fluent smooth and the final product looks stiff and PS2 like. Still a good game but not what we paid for
*MMMHMMHMHMMMHMHMHMMMMMMMHHHHMMMMMMMM*
its a fake hostage the storyline of r6 is that its a training operation, they changed the storyline since the trailer it was supposed to be a pve based game
Holy shit the fake chat/banter between teammates always drove me crazy. They are almost telling you that this is a performance instead of the real thing
Brace yourself for PvP
@@Mochachocakonstill haunts me 😭
Is like those mobile game ads.
Yeah there's a reason no one does that with singleplayer games so why even do it with multiplayer?
If it was realistic it should have been screaming and sometimes bussing
The voice chat really shows how disconnected Ubisoft is from their audience
'Hey roger tango to your six"
I’m not too fussed over it in the trailers, as they are supposed to be promotional videos, like adverts on your TV, but what I will say it is super unrealistic, like RB6 Siege chatter is nothing like that, In reality the game has a super toxic playerbase and people trash talk SO much, and if you don’t play the way somebody in the game wants you too (cause he believe he knows better) he votes to kick you and rages at you... that’s real chatter
Yeah ok and all but.... like the trailer came out before the game....
I agree. it definitely needed more racial slurs and your mom jokes
@@AyaanMurad They should have known, literally every FPS has the same kind of trash talk.
R6 trailer: Grabbing the hostage and carefully exists the house.
Actual game: *uses Ash to grab the hostage and runs away at 4 speed*
Bruh did you say grab the hostage? I thought you said forget the hostage and try to 1v5, my bad. No, wait... its your fault.
She was used as a human shield. lol
XD
Ash...grabbing hostage??? Ash player only go for speed kill not grab n go.
Fuze: Nah i dont care for no one
The early-game clips with "voice chat" sounded so artificial i thought they were npc's
I just now realized that. Wow, I thought it was weird when the npc said, "we're unlocking my base up here on the right"
I realise that only when the woman said " shit, they got me" when she was killed.
Then I laught a lot.... Yeah thats how teammates play...sure.
They really don’t understand how people are on voice chat. It’s just a bunch of screeching and people being stupid.
lol I thought so too.
In the division i thought they were npcs until they said “players”
The fake chat is one of the cringiest things I have ever witnessed.
I just wanna say, if a teammate ever looked at me and said “brace for PvP!” I would probably turn around and shoot them.
I KNOW!
I would drag them then burn them and frickin overkill
“ayo dude lets shoot this nerd”
_
irl
Devs: Alright, now all we have to do is add lighting to the game.
Publisher: Uh, the game released yesterday.
Bruh im dead
Lol
Lmao I'm a programmer and this made me ROFL🤣
HAHAHA
It's like Ubisoft takes 2 steps forwards, then falls down the stairs
Oh yes 🤣
Because of hardware limitations
Your comment made my day 🤣
@@MrMetallix Then they should not be advertising what they can’t actually put in the game. Doesn’t take a genius to figure that out
@@jimmydarm watchdogs was one of the first games for the ps4 and Xbox one…. They advertised what they were working on at the time… but when push came to shove, the consoles couldn’t handle as much as they originally predicted… so the had to lower the graphics a bit to make the game run smoother.. it doesn’t take a genius to figure it out… and the game was still awesome and had really good graphics for the time….
This absolutely needs a part 2 or some sort of follow up with everything they've released since then.
These aren’t true comparisons, he didn’t even try to match time of day or DO THE ACTUAL MISSIONS! Of course it’s going to look different. There is no downgrade then or today
@Alex Williams lol what? Yes, some are different times of day but the effects aren't there at all. I guess you are technically correct because they're pre-rendered so you can't downgrade a render. But the end product was a downgrade from the presented product.
@@1Guason3 I guarantee the effects are there if you wait for time of day or go to a drain pipe that’s steaming. Division world is always going you just hop in(division actually has way more detail then this trailer). That police station I was going in the lock up area, the fitness, and the lieutenant’s office. In watchdogs just wait for rain, dusk, and the coffee shop to be populated it looks exactly the same. This is BS. You can make any game look this bad.
@Alex Williams I can't speak for the division. But I can speak for R6 and FC. I've seen those two plus more from UBI get downgraded. I love ubi, but I will never backup a studio that doesn't maintain its track record.
@@alexwilliams4729 Lol no. Watch Dogs literally has the E3 graphics settings hidden away, you can enable them on the PC version with a mod. Minus a few effects that were never implemented at all. But PS4 couldn't support that so was all stripped back.
Division is just lifeless in the release version, all that movement and life in the environment is gone. Completely different map menu, numerous closed off areas from the demo. Plus the combat was completely faked.
The definition of insanity:
Getting hyped for Ubisoft games over and over again expecting shit to change.
Cyberpunk copy ubisoft 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂okno XD
Well legion and valhalla graphics weren't a lie
@@rexon5174 still mediocre games
@@rexon5174 they need to fix Valhallas shit audio. Sounds so compressed and ruins immersion
@@ightimmaheadout290 they need to fix that the series is still alive
This just demonstrates how important lighting is to make something look good.
Of course
Lighting is even more important than texture quality, in my opinion, the thing is, a good looking, dynamic lighting, is difficult to make and heavy to support, that’s why most games have pale lighting, but never forgetting the hd textures, of course :/
I also think that ambience sounds such as leaves and wind are important as well
I love that profile pic flopster
@@artyom8905 Look at RE7, for example. Game has really horrible textures for many things, but the lighting and atmosphere literally makes it unnoticeable. Same goes for something like the BioShock trilogy for last gen
If i had a nickle for every time I or a friend said “brace for pvp” i would have zero nickle’s
@SP what's up your ass?
@SP bruh
@SP he was stating that people dont normaly use the phrase 'brace for pvp' which leads me to believe the voice acting is very forced. take the stick out your ass buddy
SP was making a joke chill out yall
@@dunkawunka2278 Pretty sure he knows that.
I recently re-played FC3 as I loved it when it first came out but the lack of a real jungle in the game really took me out of the experience. I think the environment of FC2, for example, aged better than 3, but that the story kinda makes up for it.
What do you mean lack of real jungle?
@@psy8917 The islands are basically made up of grass plains with palm trees scattered around. There are no dense jungles like the ones advertised.
@@Linus_B Conversely, FC2 had a huge amount of 'jungle' to wander into and get shot like a dog in.
Far Cry 3 feels so fake to walk through.
far cry 2 is a billion times better than all the other FCs combined
You know it's bad when you can still spot the difference in 240p
Can you not go up to 144p
@@DucksFor4 what
@@allmightywhale he is asking him to up his level to 144p and not go up from 240 to 144
@@DucksFor4 they could’ve been on data which is known to not be the best
@@DucksFor4 144p is how real man watch
Ubisoft makes their games the way Spongebob draws a circle.
Best FRICKING comment I seen in my life thank you for this moment!
This comment is so true it hurts lol
Spongbob can draw a perfect circle actually
momen bazzar yea but first he took something perfect already and erased It to make a circle
Why is this so funny
I love it when game companies try to show how friendly and cooperative their community is online when we all know how brutal they always are
Haha yeah for real kill or be killed
More like kill first then talk
The community: DOOR STUCK!! DOOR STUCK!!
I love the minimalistic approach Ubisoft puts into their game, really sells the feeling of treachery.
Always makes me cringe when actors pretend to be players on voice chat.
agreed
+Uncle Joey's Bizzare Adventure true
"fuck u, teabagging scrubs"
so that's how they name their engine? Cry engine? well,that is only farcry 1 huh.
you're kidding right? cry engine isn't ubisoft
The problem with Ubisoft's "downgrades" is that the initial reveal is so scripted/pre-rendered that you don't believe it's a videogame
More like NASA pc
Because it isn’t, the trailers are so unrealistically good looking. All of the games in this video are good, but they were showed in an unrealistic way, every company does this, I don’t know why people only point out Ubisoft “downgrades”.
Watch dogs 1 was actually a playable build demo, but it’s just a demo. When compared they’d have to add the same finesse and scripting level to every mission to meet the expectations the trailer gave. I still love watchdogs 1 but man I wish they put more love into it. Not saying they didn’t put love it’s a well done game but missed the expectation mark the trailer gave
@@PastPositive actually, “every” company does not do this.
@@PastPositive my thought exactly, like literally every game company does this, they just pre render cutscenes to make it look like gameplay
That watchdogs explosion was the saddest shit I’ve ever witnessed
kind of the same sentence my wife said after sex
@@TroublTurtle I'm sorry for you bro
Is watchdogs a good game?
@@terriblebadedits3814 nope, save your money
@@WhatAmIDoing229 k
sad thing is that R6's old lighting, as amazing as it was, became a massive issue gameplay-wise
The game _never_ had the E3 lighting, I remember playing it on launch and it looked nothing like the E3 trailers did, nor did it play like the trailers did, the trailers didnt even advertise it as a Counter-Strike style game lol.
It's totally different visually now to the way it was on launch yes but the launch version of the game did not look at all like the E3 advertising.
"shit he got me"
"where is he?"
"IT DOESN'T MATTER HURRY"
strikingly accurate representation of my team's callouts
Guy Person I swear to god😂
Whenever I die I scream the room I died in, from, and then where I saw the guy shoot me from.
"I DIED IN BATHROOM FROM SPIRAL" just because I have about four brain cells to make a phrase with.
666 like
Shit I'm dead...
Where is he?
You're mom gay
Only realistic voice line in the trailer
So far the only next gen Ubisoft game that didn't get downgraded from an e3 demo is South Park.
Not sure
I think that's because Ubisoft is not a developer of South Park, it's Obsidian.
Ubisoft is only publishing.
Thank god.
Ha!
我完全同意你... I'm in entire agreement with you..
Actually it was heavily changed but it wasn't on E3. Only on pictures.
Biggest lie in most E3 trailers, "it isn´t scripted"
It isn’t scripted it’s just those two AIs interacting at the cross-section with each other
Dhuill % yeah like the ‘unscripted’ monster at Anthem’s E3 demo
I mean, there was a penis drawn on the wall in the r6 siege trailer
You can see it on the left at 9:04
@@juicedinsomniac5198 I guess lol 😂
This eagle animation, where he take this Animal isnt even in the game
when you order a cheese burger, chips and a coke, and they bring out a plain cheese sandwich, a pack of crisps and a bottle of water
“Sorry guys for losing the hostage”
“Hey don’t worry about it”
LMAO.....NO one speaks like that irl 🤣
Pretty sure he would have been called a dummy & piece of shit until the round ended
@@KyleAlexanderkneeGrowPlz even more if killed by a fuze
Lol he would have probably raged quit right after
inaccurate af in a real game lmao
I’m just imaging that hostage dead on the ground behind them
They should add another setting after ULTRA called E3
Lol
You would need a supercomputer to run it, these E3 videos probably took hours to be renderered
+toby Hogan you atleast need 2 GTX 1080 to run on E3 settings with 60 fps XD
+deez nuts +toby Hogan
BS, every strong graphics card can handle it. You don't need the overpriced 1080 for it.
Direkt aber fair i..... err what. I think you missed the point of my post.
"woah its another group of players, get ready for pvp" yes i also talk to video game players this way my fellow teens
There seems to be other players about let's slowly move to a spot or try to shoot the enemies with our incredibly bad aim
Ubisoft player: I am afraid I have died due to a fatal gunshot wound I took to the torso.
Actual player: *F U C K*
If those fuckers get my loot I'm swatting you all!
Ubisoft: "Get ready for PvP."
Real players: "Oh shit where did these fuckers come from!"
“OH SHIT PEOPLE HERE”
“WHERE?”
“NORRTH”
“AAHH SHIT”
The way the division looked compared to how it is, is such a soul crusher I love the division but seeing how it was supposed to be or the intended version is crushing
the siege part is extremely different, instead of them all yelling at each other for every mess up they're nice
try out zero hour if you have a pc. Its really good
The aim hasn't changed though
@@kvlrr5437 Is zero hour multiplayer because I would love to get an actual tactical team shooter rather than unemployed 30 year-old men screaming at me because I picked a character in a videogame
@@hazart8909 It is a pvp multiplayer game. If you want a tactial team shooter i recommend Ready Or Not. Its up on steam for $40. You and up to 4 friends can go into a swat scenario to rescue hostage and/or defuse bombs in an allotted time frame. The only one with a timer is the bomb defusal one. You got to take everything slow, cam snake the doors, slowly peek a door incase there is a tripwire trap that will kill you and possibly your whole team, and you got to keep an eye on the hostages since they could be one of the bad guys in disguise.
@@hazart8909 Although Zero Hour did add a pve mode to the game kind of recently. The animations look a bit jank though from the videos that is on the steam page
These are literally McDonald ads; burgers looks great in the ad but once you get it irl, the cheese is on top of the bun
if they remembered the cheese
Thats why you dont preorder the next burger
wait, maccas burger come with buns?
Wait McDonald's is a Restaurant ?
Wait, McDonald's have a bun?
"it's Evolving, just Backwards"
@@Perfectb-l1q yes
A- Ha it’s evolving just backwards is a meme
There has never been a better meaning for this quote than for this
Just like humanity
Just like the TENET
Me having an existential crisis realizing this was posted 6 years ago
The fact it's only gotten worse too 💀
Nah, Ubisoft Just kinda stopped doing that, Just take a look at watchdogs 2 graphics
“Brace for PVP”
Guys, they told us to brace for a Profound Visual Plunge and we didn’t listen
Thanks for your opinion teethfull ostrich.
Jose Julián Jacinto Tobar it is my honor to offer it, my liege.
actually he meant player v player. ubisoft wouldnt be so honest. theyre so smart and deceptive that no one has caught up to what they do
Cosma “They had us in the first half, not gonna lie.”
@@b.p.emma. jesus
If anyone I'm playing with ever says "brace for pvp" to me, I'm blocking them.
*Brace for cock*
Send em some gay porn and tell them to brace for peepee
brace for pvp
Brace for pcp
@@larks. close enough
i love how unintentionally comedic this video is. One second it's action packed and in the next, dead silence just standing around, haha
Also, with the far cry games, i think they actually kinda look better than their respective showcases
+godzkinkong yeah the far cry is good but the other games are not
😂😂😂
This guy gets it. This is why I laughed so hard. Lololol
I know, I could tell he was being humorous
Like the spinach that comes out when we excitedly open the ice cream box in the fridge
The downgrade from Watch Dogs and The Division are painful, what a joke
The Muffin wait how? Is there a video
I feel like Rainbow 6 Siege is the most painful...
@@memedealermikey
Well it is just the trailer so there are a bunch of changes
The Muffin how do you do this????
bacon master yes but you aren’t supposed to falsely advertise graphics...
r6 dialougue in the trailer: "theres a guy at your 6 watch out!!''
r6 dialougue in multiplayer: "lol just threw a grenade at the hostages face and he died lmao"
Those unrealistic dialogs in multiplayer based game trailers are cringe af
r6 dialougue in the trailer: "there is a guy at your 6 watch out!!"
r6 dialougue in reality:
"There is a guy!"
"where??"
"there!!"
"WHERE!?!"
"THERE!!"
*gets killed*
"told you."
R6 dialogue in the trailer: "There's a guy at your 6!"
R6 dialogue in real life:
"....anybody got a mic?"
"shut the fuck up."
@@atomicfireball2302 that's true
You obviously play with handicapped people which says a lot about your skill
Basically those mobile game ads that always have completely fake gameplay, just on a less dramatic scale.
Why everyone talking shit like wtf.
If you're disappointed then go make a game and see how many peoples talk shit about you
@@Justradleg Hmm, yet minecraft is literally low res textures all over the place and yet everyone loves it.. go ahead, please.
@@t2hk_ since when does graphics have to do with the concept
@@t2hk_ as long as you have fun.
@@Justradleg stop being a fucking child
Blows my mind that this isnt illegal. Especially in cases like Watch Dogs and The Division. And even though this video is 7 years old this stuff still happens today on a giant scale with AAA games. Hopefully at some point they will start being held accountable in a legal sense.
As annoying as it is getting bait-and-switched by devs (*cough* Cyberpunk), people neglect to mention the times where there are actually valid reasons for it, or the direction/vision for the game changes. Many of these changes are for the sake of practicality, playability, and performance, not just because they couldn't be arsed following through. I agree, though, that it's wrong to set everyone's expectations in the sky, only to deliver something phenomenally waist-height lol
One example of changes for valid(ish) reasons, is R6 Siege. It started off as a multiplayer tactical FPS, but its development and future went in the direction of COMPETITIVE multiplayer tactical FPS. When a game becomes competitive, it can't be an absolute graphics blunderbuss and obliterate anyone's PC that isn't worth at least £3k/$3k, the graphical bar has to be dropped, which means less dynamic lighting/shadows and replacing all that with baked in shit, simpler animations and animation blending, calmer particle effects, and also less/simpler player animations for the sake of smooth and functional gameplay, most of the shit that makes an E3 demo look so good... nobody is wishing CS:GO had cover mechanics and inverse kinematics or locked in animations for running up and down stairs because it'd make it a bit of a Jankfest and greatly hinder the competitive gameplay aspect.
There's almost no excuse for single player games however, that shit just fucking boils my piss. Devs need to stop fucking around and mugging idiots off and idiots need to stop supporting their scummy antics and repeatedly buying the same piles of trash from the same scammers... EA Sports, EA Games, Bethesda. Primarily, the devs need to realise that without them, their publishers are basically nothing. If all the dev teams told publishers to stuff it when they're asked to make a 2 year project in 6 months, rather than bending over backwards to push unfinished shit, publishers would calm down and back off a bit, but I guess that's the problem. A dev team says they can't do it in that too-short-a-time, so the publishers just go "aight" and go find a different dev team that are happy to rob the first team's opportunity, even if that means churning out unfinished dogshit.
Fuck me, that's balled me off a bit lol, why does every company have to be scummy as fuck. Sorry for the rant :)
At least some companies like rockstar are honest and most of the times the games look even Better than the trailer/E3
Ubisoft, "One step forward, eight steps back."
Daffa 324 Pretty sure that was Nintendo’s meme. 😅
That's the very definition of Ubisoft when translated to English.
Sniper Wolf if that is Nintendo's meme then I've made a new one!!
"One step forward, twelve steps backward"
True. But Rockstar two steps forward, no step backward.
"TAKE SEVEN STEPS BACK"
When you spend all the skill points in marketing
Greatest comment I stumbled across in a while
*all of your money
@@IntergalacticVoid thank you captain obvious
@@MANZDU You're welcome
@@IntergalacticVoid Thanks Captain obvious .
Did I ever tell you the definition of insanity? Insanity is buying ubisoft games over and over year after year again and expecting shit to change.
nice, also sadly true!
Good one
Actually I like Ubi games, but I'm not buying everything and not in pre-order. I like two last Splinter Cells, I like Far Cry 3 and 4, Ghost Recon Future Soldier and of course I like The Division. Downgrading it is not a problem for me, games cause I'm not excited with graphics in trailer but with game features showed in trailer. And they never gave me up.
+Tomasz Plasota (han solo 79) features have changed so you are excited for what?
Yea, they have even changed features ingame... see watch dogs AI and weather and again see rainbow six and its destructibility. They have nerfed both games in features!
I think you need to rewatch the video, because we don't speak only about graphic at all.
Important to showcase such examples of a downgrading "development". The gaming industry needs that kind of feedback as a mirror for the community, gamers and in conclusion their customers. That RUclips channel is pure bliss in that regard - and often comedy gold. 😅 Thanks for this content! 👌
Nah, Only Ubisoft needs it
Other game devs like rockstar actually upgrade the graphics from trailers instead of downgrading them
All the far cry’s are weird because it’s like “let’s increase the texture quality but remove a lot of things”
I’m assuming you saw that video comparing Far Cry 5 and Far Cry 2? Same, that shit is crazy
Me irl trying to get 40fps with good quality textures
Ubisoft: We have this cool idea!
People: Cool, make it a thing!
Ubisoft: Sorry, what?
Underrated😂
We cant really do that.
Business its business
We don't do that here
I dont understand what are you saying
The voice chat in the trailers makes me want to eat my hand.
Brace for pvp
MARS I cringed so hard when he said that
@@josephpapilson7224 what do you mean by ancient mind?
yeah that fake ass voice chat scripted bs. Very unrealistic.
This comment matches very well with your profile picture
I can forgive releases not looking 100% like the E3 demos, but it's criminal what some of these games look like after years of "updates and changes" (R6 mainly)
10:20 "You can be attacked from above for the first time in a Far Cry game". Far Cry 1 had helicopters... that would fly above you... and attack you... First time my ass.
You're right, but I guess they can't take the credit because Far Cry 1 was developed by Crytek.
Far cry 3 had helicopters too it wasn't about being attacked by vehicles it was about animals aka the eagle.
Yeah but those were all hardcoded sequences.
What they meant here is it can happen in normal gameplay, as you're free-roaming.
while fleeing from vaas men, you get attacked by a helicopter and jason has to shooting it down, so.
@@StarLink149 you're wrong. They chase you around the island in free roam
the actors they hire to pretend like they're playing the game is really funny to me
it's so cringy
For real do they know how people actually talk when they play games with friends?
egh
I'd call it anything but funny. It's pathetic to say the least. I think the marketing people at Ubisoft really think that their customers are stupid enough to believe all this farce. It's insulting.
Well, considering idiots still buy their games they are not truly wrong.
Im surprised Ubisoft has not been charged with false advertising.
Same here
Its hard to convince the jury of this stuff, and Ubisoft is a large corporation its a waste of money if no huge power bursts in the fight
They spare charges with only one phrase: "Subject to change"
It's not false advertising, the games are pre release then can change anything at their own discretion. It's still a scummy thing to do.
Climatic Hawk come on its a cinematic build of the game half the time they aren't even playing it just runs on a PC and they stand there with a controller.
What is it with Ubisoft writing the most cringe ass in game voice chat dialogue in the world, like wtf? it's not even just the unrealism, just the fact they chose the most cringeworthy lines and edit it in a way that when one says something, the other guy would immediately respond, like c'mon now.
"Sorry guys for losing the hostage"
"Nah man don't worry about it"
Whaaaat ?! 😂😂
@@leandrebonsaint153And Jesus could the guy not shoot a pistol or what. They shot to wall 20 times.
Fuze: Hold ma beer
7:57
*You were voted out of the match.*
Lmao
Idk man some of these downgrades should be considered false advertising, they look like completely different games...
You don’t say?
Consoles can’t produce PC quality graphics. Plain and simple. That’s why they “downgrade” them.
@@Hadouken5150 not true, they even downgrade them for pc. Although I agree with pc being more powerful, it has nothing to do with it
Unfortunately. People will say "this is not the final representation of our product"
@@Hadouken5150 it’s not just the graphics though even the level design and sound design and animation is different like in that Tom Clancy game there isn’t even that area that they went through in the trailer and in far cry the anima on on the face looks worse and when they fall into the water the sound design is bad so instead of there being drowning noises that make it more full of action it’s oddly quiet
Developer: how much lighting do you want in the game when its finished?
Ubisoft boss: no
How much do you want in trailer? Ubi - yes
The map do be on night tho.
@@masonelliott7674 i think there is a mod for the graphics for watch dogs. It was like what is shown in the demo
QRPYWRPY you obv have never played rainbow because there is no mods. The map is on night and the helicopter got taken out of the game so ofc there will be no lighting
"And what about brightness?"
-YES!!
This video gets recommended for me like 3 times every year... and I always rewatch it
"Heads Up!"
"Get ready for some PVP guys"
Said no one ever.
Right, ubisoft does not know their audience
Idk why but even though it's goofy and cringey it has its certain charm. I prefer this style of presentation to the new slideshow ass presentation where they list every mundane feature ever instead of showing and show like a minute of "gameplay"
I'm saying fam lmaooo I wouldve been like "there som bitch ass scrubs on our right nigga!
"I hate this stupid fucking game."
Yeah, haha, I know…right.
I feel beyond attacked, I felt like I was murdered lol
Vas' design in farcry 3 felt like an upgrade tbh. He's facial exprecions and clothes looked more convinsing imo
I agree but the textures got a bit worse
@@scytarius that's true
Here I go being art snobby again...
Personally I prefer the presentation version. Graphically it tied FC3 back to the previous 2 games and would've taken some of the edge off. For Vaas it offered a more striking silhouette, he wasn't just a pirate with a face scar, he had bugged out restless eyes, and thick black hair that contrasted well with both his own head and the background. The old told you exactly who Vaas is before he ever spoke a word, and made him visually as special as his personality was.
Retail better fits the "in" style at the time, realism, which looks "better" in terms of looking more like real life, but it looses some of the visual character in the process and makes it blend with games that came afterward. Sure the cut and more realistic appearance makes Vaas more imtimidating, but also made him visually forgettable in an ongoing era of grizzled soldiers with face scars in every, damn, shooter.
At least it's better than either of the two styles currently "in", Cartoon Neon and Realistic Minimalism.
@@KiraSlith That's an interesting take. His design really stod out from everyone else, not to mention the landscape and the background.
@@KiraSlith you might be interested in a video called “the aesthetics of far cry 3”
It should be illegal for companies to bait and switch.
Its not that deep some of those things cant cooperate with the code
@@ismaelj2804 What? What are you talking about?
@@Halopen94 spiderman woulda look like plastic wrap if they kept the original look that you guys cried about insomniac did a side by side view of the 2 chararcter models and thats just one case of that
@@ismaelj2804 He said that it should be illegal for companies to bait and switch, what's your point buddy?
@@ismaelj2804 you're a goddamn idiot
Trailer: particles, effects, reflections, dynamic lighting, full color gradiation, and physics everywhere. Ton of NPCs walking around and dynamic animations
Game: All of the above nearly gone and colors look flat
Rainbow six siege
Hostage in trailer: women
Hostage in game: Bald Man
Fuze: Confused Screaming
Confuzed screaming ;)
@@thegreatfilou good one buddy
They downgraded even the hostage 😂😂
You forgot to include "Hot"
There’s a woman hostage too.
Holly shit the division was a fucking crime
OMGisGreen tell me about it. I bought the game.
OMGisGreen EXACTLY
KaiD shit I pre ordered the fucker I never felt so mislead in my life.
Sanquan Harrell damn right
Sanquan Harrell I preordered no man's sky, how do you think I feel!?
The hostage in the e3 demo looks and behaves like an actual person compared to the actual game. This will bother me forever
Fr
guardian X I know right how hard is it to make some half decent AI
eeeeeeh to be honest, i prefer the autistic version, because they wont tell the enemys your drone is nearby or anything. in general, im pretty okay with the fact that rainbow is how it is and not like the trailer, if all those shadows would be there, sure it would look nice but then it also would be waaaaay harder to spot enemys on the ground, just think of rook or caveira lying down in a dark spot, no chance you´re gonna see them before they see you. lastly, i just think they should present games how they are and not how they look the best at first glance.
Tendō Pain in fact,it would have required huge pc powers,which is bad for a competetive shooter,but it would have been really much more realistic,which is good !
rainbow six is biggest downgrade
3:50 I like how the fire is just "near the car" on the right 😂
It's not even that the final product is bad, it's just that we were lied to so enormously that regardless of how good the end product was it was never going to live up to expectations
Ubisoft is the Tesla of video games.
So that basically contradicts ur point.
The games ARE bad.
@@117MasterSpartan No, they’re bad in comparison to what E3 showed us
@@ILikeSoda229
Siege is trash, TD1 is trash, watch dogs is trash and every far cry after 3 is also trash
@@TheJohn_Highway every far cry after 3 is trash? bit of a stretch 4-5 are not that terrible, new dawn is garbage and 6 is mid at best.
Watch Dogs 1 is trash?
"wowowo its another group of players brace for pvp"
no actual player of a multiplayer game with pvp would talk like this
Yeah lol
Yeah I laughed when I heard that as well
But it sounds cool ^^
the rainbow 6 once still got me because when that girl is sniping outside of the house you know for a fact the entire time the team would be saying "what the fuck you doing, group up with team"
Man, I remember before the Division came out that I pointed out this exact same thing on that E3 trailer and got crapped on by everyone in comments. :/ Great to know that there are other sane people on the web.
"Woah woah woah it's another group of players, brace for pvp"
Big yikes.
I would never play games with that cornhead
Hello, fellow gamers.
Actual VC:
“Alright you fucking dumbasses there’s some cock sucking niggas over here.”
The perfect dub from professional voice-actors make the games stink of the corporate smell.
The average gamer always have shitty headphone mics, swears half of the time and rarely work with his teammates.
@@saddogofwisdom8103 this made me laugh way too much
The Watch Dogs one is honestly the one that hurt me the most, and the one I still remember to this day
Far cry 3 certainly wasn’t a downgrade on the character model for vaas. Everything else though, fair enough.
yea i was looking for someone else to say this. IMO release vaas looks much better
Old vaas looks like plastic.
I think in higher res, the colour gamete improved but sacrificed water and animations
MR. ICE yeah farcry 3 in my opinion got a lot better then the trailer also the other games got murdered literally
Jakethemoss it is cause of the year, back then ub did things differently.
i got my friends so hyped for the division I felt like such an asshole when it finally came out.
Yeah it really looks like shit.
That E3 reveal was one of the best I've ever seen, I have yet to be as hyped for a game as I was for TD. I remember how buggy and hackable it was when it was first released too, just bad. The funny thing is I still play it lol, it's still a unique game. It could have been an all-time great.
@@jacobf7409 it doesn't just look like shit, it's also boring and brings absolutely nothing new to the table. At this point who even cares about realistic graphics. I just want to see something with a well written, believable story with gameplay elements that aren't obviously just copy-paste jobs from title to title.
the division 2 isnt too bad, i got it free with my headset anyway :)
@@ceetee110 the division is never about story, its about gameplay and rpg. if you want story and an easy game where you dont have to beat the enemy to death i have no idea why you would ever buy the division. didnt everyone already know the division is the dark souls of fps game? the gameplay isnt bad either even though it is console focused in pc the controls are very smooth
how to beat them when they do this? dont preorder games
just lifeless people preorder games:v
what if you want whatever they offer for pre ordering?
+Justice Sather (Justice618) pre order it at 10pm like i did
*Dont pre order Ubisoft games.
^this
Back here to remind myself to not get too hyped up for Star Wars Outlaws
I did the same thing. People won't learn though.
Turns out it was bad
The funniest thing for me is how they always show the „perfect“ Multiplayer Teammates and how they all work together. We all know that they‘re all just screaming into the mic and rampaging through the levels
Reality is often disappointing
BRACE FOR PVP.
Maxon
That is, it was. Now... reality can be whatever I want.
Ubisoft be like...
RTX On
RTX Off
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
more like low vs ultra
that's what i think.. just look at the water reflections...
Ultra with rtx vs low without rtx
@@Whysoserious6765 its ray tracing, basically its shadows.
WATCH_DOGS was a bigger disappointment to everyone than I am to my parents.
Haha good one
Idk man, thats kind of a stretch, i'd say you may be a bigger disapointment
Xppp1 Ha!!
Xppp1 no u
Jake Hayes watch dogs was still good tho
We are in middle 2023, and this video never been so real, even all those years later. Nothing changed.
The Only game they didn't downgrade was watchdogs 2 tbh
"Brace for pvp"
???????????????
This has got to be a joke
You don't say that when you play online Vidya games, fellow gamer?
LMAO so whack who thinks of this shit
It's almost like they're doing it for marketing purposes.......
@@CoLDSuNdeR corporate old men who are out of touch with humanity.
@@WoofyMcDoodle The biggest joke is the hostage
I downloaded the game to save a vulnurable life like hostage not an ugly ass old man who's gonna die in a few years
I like how in the Siege demo, they do an entire tour of whole house, just to end up trying to go out the window they originally came through.
i just realized
Kill devils, nice
Can we appreciate this man's dedication to being able to edit a cohesive video and maintain a storyline/theme with only the magic of editing. Zero words.
Well unlike the bots in Counter Strike Source and Global Offensive
@@Waddle_Dee_With_Internet what?
@@EricToTheScionti I think he’s referring to the E3 trailers in this video about AI talking which it weren’t implemented into the retail one. Compare that to Counter Strike Source and Global Offensive, bots communicate in certain quotes.
Just saw the Star Wars Outlaw gameplay. Can't help but come back to this.
Seem like Ubi forget to paid RUclips to hide this Video
Ubisoft are selling you cake but then giving you rice.
No, they're selling you steak but then giving you chicken nuggets.
Paul Junng rice is better than cake
Andy Ren Sure.
***** Ah, now I understand
Paul Junng lel i'm Asian so I like rice better than cake
So basically ubisoft keep the best ones for themselves.
The best ones dont exist, they are like benchmark levels
@@Paperkutchy he just make a joke
@@TiMERZ Don’t tell him, let him think he is a genius for figuring that out by himself.
@@Paperkutchy I'm pretty sure they are scripted events or cutscenes
Rainbow Six Siege E3: Players drop down from a helicopter into a suburban neighborhood with dramatic nighttime lighting as the surrounding area is heavy with fog lit by streetlights.
Rainbow Six Siege Actual Gameplay: BROWN
Lol
atleast its not new vegas
@This Ain’t Joker im not reffering to the bugs but the orange filter
especifically on the fort if you fast travel to another place you can see the exessive filter
Rainbow Six Siege actual gameplay: * Gets Spawn Peaked*
Ubi: add battle pass in r6
R6 community and chanka fans: *you shall not pass!*
“Wait Wait- Throwing Drone”
*Throws Pencil*
xD
Lmao
The divisions was way worse
Measly YT hell no
this is why they haven't shown any "gameplay" of AC Vahalla
It's obviously not gonna look just like the trailers. That shouldn't mean it's gonna look terrible (hopefully it doesn't look Odyssey character model terrible though)
AC Trashalla looks like a potato and runs at 30fps
@@jerrybrown6460 because the graphics are good bitch
@@dummy.phat_womprat It's better they don't show us if they are just going to downgrade it. Just show us the actual product.
😂😂😂😂😂👌🏼
EA: Pay-to-win
Ubisoft: Bait-and-Switch
Valve: Hates-the-#-3
Tectonix Rockstar: Perfectly done games with amazing graphics and they actually care about the player more than the money
No valve is just arrogant-and-lazy.
@@roclops they make very good games and get good in return
@@roclops Rockstar hasn't made a great game since LA Noire.
@@TheTeremaster Well clearly you know nothing about good games then! Go back to playing EA games you ignorant dumbass!
The fact that this video is 8yo and Ubisoft still going downhill is crazy
One thing I’ve consistently noticed Ubisoft games struggling with is Lighting and Shading. Textures are good, sure, but proper lighting carries graphics better well beyond a game’s prime.
just look at Halo 3.
Lighting and physics are the two most demanding parts of game development. Notice how every game has had those interactions cut or heavily downgraded.
@@GAContempt you’re right. And that drastically diminishes the fidelity of every game Ubisoft promotes.
@@GAContempt but how is it that doom 3 can make better lighting and shadows from 2004 compared to a game(s) released in 2015?
@@beaners1234life Because ID are some of the best developers in the industry. But also many games in the 7th Gen didn't have superrealistic shadows or real-time dynamic lighting, and they cheated the system a bit which improved performance. 8th Gen consoles had awful, horrible CPUs which meant that dynamic lighting could still be achieved (not well, as the GPUs also sucked) but physics were absolutely screwed.
Conclusion : Ubisoft is a legend at demos and making trailers
Yeah.. They make games on different engine than original game engine and actual gameplay.
+They add additional optimization.
(Maybe.. not sure)
No that is not the conclusion. The conclusion is that ubisoft is a manipulating fuck that relies on tricking watchers to buy their game
Horzinicla wow! Trailers are made to make the viewers want to buy the games. Woah crazy
@@nono7117 They outright lie about their game quality, they are manipulative. If you want people to buy your game, don't lie to them about what it'll end up like. They could leave the graphics in E3 in there on some extra special setting and force everyone to by default use the lower preset therefore they are not responsible for players devices having trouble running it.
@@magellanic750 I doubt they rendered the entire game with those extra special graphics
This video is so important. Whenever you see "gameplay footage" of a game prior to its release, remember this video and curb your enthusiasm.
Exactly
I hope cd projekt red won't do that
@@octo190 same I'm scared now
@Hakim Habib That is my only hope
@@octo190
They already did...
Didn't you notice the downgrade of The Witcher 3?
I remember The Division being the last game I was genuinely excited for. One of the main things I couldn’t get over was how good the map looked in the “gameplay trailer”. Once it came out I made an official vow to never get excited for a video game again