So now that you got to play with both the Pro and the MP. Which one do you believe provides the most power on groundstrokes and serve. And which would you prefer to play with if you had to choose?
Well, if they were weighted the same the MP would have more power but in stock form the power is pretty similar just because the pro version has more mass. I’d most likely go with the MP and add a little bit of lead at 3/9
be careful the radical pro is not only stiffer than the pro staff, but it has a very bad stiffness feel, not crisp like a pure aero etc, it's jarring, the worst racquet in terms of feel on the market !
Nice review, but I thought sound grommets were there in the previous generation as well?
Thank you! Also, it turns out that you are right. The sound grommets were introduced last generation.
So now that you got to play with both the Pro and the MP. Which one do you believe provides the most power on groundstrokes and serve. And which would you prefer to play with if you had to choose?
Well, if they were weighted the same the MP would have more power but in stock form the power is pretty similar just because the pro version has more mass. I’d most likely go with the MP and add a little bit of lead at 3/9
First! Thanks for this video man! Is it softer on contact than the Pro Staff 97? How is the slightly different feel?
Thanks. For me the Pro Staff feels a bit softer but if you’re in the market for a racket like that I would definitely try both.
be careful the radical pro is not only stiffer than the pro staff, but it has a very bad stiffness feel, not crisp like a pure aero etc, it's jarring, the worst racquet in terms of feel on the market !