ERRATA 17:52 "Proprietary" is apparently not the correct word. Nvidia never owned RT. 19:48 should read AVG 38.4 0.1% 29.2 21:03 I said “RTAO”, I meant “RTGI” 29:55 I forgot to add the track name for the background music. It’s “The Doc Will See You Now” by Backingtrack DRINKING GAME: Do a shot whenever I say “Resolution”, “PS5” or “Console”
I can't believe AMD is able to release integrated graphics that powerful for consoles yet we are barely getting chips that match last gen consoles on PC.
I was talking about integrated graphics in particular. PC APUs are very unbalanced, the most expensive models have very powerful CPUs but GPU wise can barely match a PS4. It should be the other way around for gaming. With decent APUs there would be no need for entry level graphics cards. And lots of PC gamers would appreciate that as The entry level GPU market has stagnated.
@@87crimson apple does powerful SOCs. would be nice if amd did too. the problem with that is that it's not as simple as just wanting to do it. the system is heavily ram-limited, so there's not much point in getting a faster APU without integrating faster memory on the SOC, at which point it might exceed the price of an entry level gpu + a good cpu, rendering it kinda moot
@@87crimson What? The 680m and 780m mobile igpus have not launched yet, they should be out later this fall. There are a few videos of the 780m in action and it's pretty mindblowing what it can do with 25w.
cause its gonna cost a ton to release this on mainstream consumers just like steam deck they are losing money to build this but their brands is way too big to compensate with that
Damn, dude your channel has been quite unique. I've been building and following computers for almost 7 years, and the amount of unique content I see for a smaller channel is staggering. Please keep doing this. Its awesome to have niche filled by somebody whose super passionate about their craft like you!
No offense but whats niche, benchmarks and commentary with parts both new and old? theres kind of a million and one channels doing it. Buildzoid aka actually hardcore overclocking is niche, the derbauers of the world are niche, this is dime a dozen.
You deserve so much more attention. This is exactly the range of performance and price that most people are in, not the bleeding edge of LTT or the chromebook flash gaming of middle school. Thank you for making important videos.
The RX 6700...the PS5 GPU. This is the best RDNA2 GPU that is available in my super small nano country. If my RX 5700XT breaks before my planned upgrade, then I either get a RX 6800 or 6700 XT.
@@alangeorge5592 I meant if it breaks and the current present, my planned upgrade will be in 2 years If there is a 7700x with 16 GB VRAM, then yes, only if the 5700 XT breaks. Had to edit my original comment!
ive considered picking this card up but my budget didn allowed it at the time,so i went with the 6600 instead.Amd is kill1ng on the used market, and late this year im getting a 6800 or 6800xt.But the 6700xt is a solid upgrade too.
Hopefully you are on a Gen4 setup cause the 8x bus on the 6600/6600xt/6650xt are a much greater concern then running a 16x card like a 6700 on a older gen3 system. Doom Eternal for example is a game that has huge performance gains on Gen4 with 8x cards.
@@BigBlackChicks again I wrote that for exactly people like you that don’t understand. Reread what I wrote. People like you that confuse those results. My main point was not 16x Gen 3 vs 16x Gen 4 but 8x cards. I said to get a 16x card if running on older gen3 so you don’t take a double performance hit from gen3 AND 8x bus speeds. Most people like you confuse gen3 vs Gen4 data as you are only factoring in two 16x cards. I was telling people to not buy 6600 8x cards on gen3 , 6700 16x cards handle the gen3 bandwidth reduction way better.
Great Video! And massive respect for putting in the work to not only produce a high quality, very long video but also leave timelines in the video and leave corrections/music in the description/comment section.
This gpu from amd saved me, the price in my country was (and depending on the gpu still is) very expensive for what the gpus delivered in terms of performance, the rx 6600 was my only and initial choice, and it's already a great one gpu, but in the middle of nowhere the rx 6700 appeared on the market for just 335$ and with practically identical performance to that of the rtx 3060 ti.
when you said "identical performance to that of the rtx 3060 ti" i thought it was a stretch but after seeing some benchmarks you're pretty much right, i guess you're only missing out on DLSS
@@BanHelsing Yes, comparing the tests with dlss from nvidia, I have a little less fps, but considering the price of rx 6700, with the rtx 3060 ti, it's better to get the 6700, because I'm not a streamer either, just a casual gamer, so I don't need nvidia technologies like Broadcast or nvenc. But anyway, from now on maybe it's worth getting the rtx 3060 ti, because it's dropping in price every day, due to the launch of the rtx 4060 ti, but it's still a little more expensive than the rx 6700.
@@BanHelsing Yeah, before I built a new pc earlier this year, I used the integrated graphics of an Intel Core i5-4460T, then in the end, I used the Intel HD Graphics 4600, I know it was very very bad.
Ever since I first heard about this card I had been waiting for a video actually comparing it to the PS5. Great to see how it compares as close as the settings/PC optimizations can match. Looking forward to the video with both the 4700G and 6700!
This is an excellent review and it shows you have put a great amount of work into this. You've earned the sub! That being said, I've been running the Powercolor version of this card for the past 6 months or so, and it's an excellent low to mid-level performer. I really don't understand why these cards are so obscure, as it found a great balance between performance (not on 4K, but decent on 1440p) and price, especially up until around 6 months ago. Thanks for putting some extra focus on it!
No u dkn't cause ps5 run tge game at 720p then upscale them to 1080p@60fps or 4k@30fps and in recejt titles like alan wake 2 and starfield it will run it at 720p and upscale it to 1080p@30ich fps Or 480p upscaled to 4k@25fps (keep in mind the settings will be somewhere around low and mid settings)
I have an RX 6700 and it’s great because it’s a value 1440p card that only requires one PCIE cable which allows me to run it on a lower powered psu. It should have at least a 600 watt, but works with no issues on a 430 watt psu. I plan to upgrade the psu, but even while running RDR2, it has never crashed on me. Great performance for a great price and low power consumption.
This is the card I'm buying next week. Haven't seen a better deal price to performance wise. Edit: I ended up waiting for the 7800XT to release and got it for £450 on black Friday.
I've used if for about 6 months, sadly I only had a 1080p monitor so I can't say much for higher resolutions, but at 1080p it's a phenomenal gpu. The XFX model runs super cool and quiet too.
This content is STELLAR. I love seeing older hardware matched up against new stuff. Goes to show you dont need top of the line and $1k to build a solid gaming PC. My interest has always been in the xeons, but your coverage has been stellar! Would be nice to compare these older xeons to stuff like i7 8700 (non-k or k) and ryzen 5 2600/3600s. Was also curious how the RX 6700 faired against your 3070 (without RT). Also certain V2 CPUs that were more obscure like the 2667v2. Thank You for all your content!
The 3070 demolishes the 6700, it also beats the 6700xt (except when its 8gb aren't enough). A more appropriate AMD equivalent would be the rx 6800. I actually went for a 6800 because it was cheaper than the 3070 at the time
Bought my lil brother a 6700 for his pc i built him for Christmas. For 1080p that card is little beast! so far hes told me he hasnt found a game that he couldnt run on maxed settings with 100+ fps
@@justinoff1 gamer's nexus' video on this was horrible. i was genuienly baffled by how bad and biased it was. it was so bad i remember it years after. they claimed that pc settings were matched to ps5 yet literally on the first test (dmc5) they test gtx 1060 at 1080p resolution for 120fps test while ps5 is at 4K checkerboard resolution targeting 120 fps. that resolution difference is no joke. around x2.2 raw pixel count difference. They do the same on dirt5 while ps5 runs at dynamic 1440p for 120fps they lock the gtx 1080 to 1080p. all they did was ''match the settings'' but not the resolution which is like the biggest performance cause. steve claims in the same video a gtx 1070 performed too well to compare it to ps5 so thats why they went with a 1060 on dmc5. i had an rx 580 at the time of that video which is equal if not better than 1060 and i actually tried the real resolution targets on dmc5 on 4K to match the console targets and my rx 580 was asking to die. i lost all respect for gamer's nexus and steve after that video and never watched a single of their videos ever since. No matter what platform you favor, being biased is not something you drip your feet in. just look at this video to see how absurd GN's video was. In this vid, ps5 matches and sometimes beats the RX 6700. RX 6700 beats 3060 on raw rasterization as well. multiple credible people on Digital foundry compares ps5 and series X to 2070 and 3060. steve was the only one and still is aside from some weirdos on his comment section to claim such weird things and literally no one called him out on it either.
@@EfecanYSL Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us Part 1 are poorly optimized games on PC, they are bad ports from a terrible company, the same one that did the PC port of Batman. In the rest of the games, the performance is similar. In A Plague Tale: Requiem, nobody knows what upscaling is used, but it's probably a cheap image scaling, not temporal upscaling that has computational weight. In the Digital Foundry comparison, DLSS 1440p with DLSS in performance mode delivered a superior image compared to the quality mode on consoles in A plague tale.
one correction, 17:50 ray tracing was never proprietary nvidia technology. they released it along side direct x ray tracing and also vulkan rt. That's why old rt titles work with all graphics cards
What an incredible video. It hit literally every point I had in my head and I was sure you'll miss this game but then you show it ok but then you won't cover this but nope you did it. You made your points so clear and concise and did everything exactly as one would expect for these things to go. Amazing work dude! Keep it up.
I have the 6700 PowerColor Fighter version - it looks ugly lol but I'm really happy with performance although it runs a bit hotter than your sapphire variant. The pricing is a bit off at the moment but last year I paid £290 brand new. I use it for 1080p High detail gaming - it absolutely shreds everything I throw at it. Fantastic video as always. I'm a new subscriber and really enjoy the high quality work you put in these.
@@NexY92 71C under full load, 90c hotspot. That is with meshify C 2x140mm intake and 2x120mm exhaust and fan curves following GPU temp. You can drop this by undervolting but I haven't played around with this yet.
I love your videos. Hilarious prose, great grammar, great delivery. And the content just gets better and better! One nit to pick: I know this is a performance simulation, but the hard thing is to normalise for image quality, and then compare performance. I don't even know how would would begin to do that.
A half hour video? You spoil us Mr. Iceberg! I’ve looked at this card a lot. I love my RX 6600, it serves all my needs, and I’m so thankful for my slightly-better-off friend who got it for me as a birthday gift, but I’ve thought long and hard about upgrading to the 6700 so I can give the 6600 to another mutual friend for their birthday and upgrade them from their GTX 1060 6GB. Unfortunately, I feel I should wait for something a little more worthwhile if I’m going to upgrade at all as I want something from team red that has support for AV1 encode, so perhaps an RX 7600/XT if it’s good and worth it or an RX 8600/XT if it’s not lol.
When using AMD shadows will kill it more than textures ,AMD does well with textures where Nvidia hates textures and other effects due to Vram but does well with RT
14:50 funny enough, even a 1660 Super can chug through Gof of War on 4K at pretty stable 30 FPS, well makes sense as the 1660 Super is more powerful than a PS4 Pro and PS4 Pro plays it at 1440p 30 FPS
I have the XFX version of this card. I was. Confused the day I saw it in my local Best Buy, cuz I never heard of it either. Great upgrade from my 1050ti
Same here. More affordable than console yet everyone talking about how consoles are cheap. Not at all. Especeally if you can download games with torrent. 🎉
Great content and production quality. I've been interested in the RX 6700 10GB for some time now. However, recently I've noticed that the 12GB (XT) model from the same brand (10GB Sapphire vs. 12GB Sapphire) is only $20-ish to $30-ish USD higher. And it's one of the rare occurrences were that 8-10% increase in price will buy you _At Least_ the same amount of performance increase, and often more. The only reason I can see to get a 10GB model is there are are more of those models with only two fans. Which might be a requirement in certain situations. They're a fantastic card for ITX builds. They produce slightly less heat stock, and undervolt very well. But, the 12GB (XT) card is significantly better for not much more money. Just my 2¢
@@Weather_Nerd There are a few, two fan, 6700 XT's out there. I think the MSI MECH version was another. But most AIB's cards are 3-fan. Has it been reliable for you?
31:50 I too did think about it the 1st time I heard about the RX 6700 GPU and saw its specs... What I didn't expect is that I'd have to wait this long for someone to figure that 1+1=2 and do a video about it!...
For those upgrading older systems on Gen3 motherboards they should go for this 16x 6700 vs the similar priced 8x 6650xt. Running a 8x Gen4 card on gen3 is equivalent to 16x gen2 bus speeds. Most people dismiss Gen4 concerns because of what they have seen in comparison videos but what they fail to realize is most of those is 16x gen3 vs 16x Gen4. 8x cards like 6650xt on gen3 is a much bigger bandwidth hit then what they see in normal comparison videos.
The 6700 non xt 10gb are all over in best buys where I live. I built my children pcs with i3 12100fs and a 6700 non 10gb they can play 1080p maxed out on almost any games without worry of fps. Clocking the gpu works best on adrenaline drivers btw
Yo thanks for making this video. I’ve always been looking for how PC GPUs and Console GPUs fared with each other and nice to see how PC still holds up. Cheers Man 🎉🎉
Awesome video Iceberg! Love the comparisons. I had a question about TLOU. How come RAM usage was about 23GB at 1440, while it was only about 10GB at 4K? Is it because the targeted framerate was lower at 4K? Crazy how huge of a difference it was. Thanks!
i bet this was the most self asked question of what the console GPU counterpart, and its soo underrated that it took this long for someone to upload this.
Considering how much more console games tend to be optimized, it's quite impressive on both ends. The PS5 and Xbox being power restricted and this card for having to deal with not perfect optimization. I'd say in reality it probably means this card is stronger overall but won't be seen really in practice due to differing levels of optimization. Still, the PS5 and Xbox do provide killer value, but you can do a lot more with a PC - the simple act of modding is a huge point in favor of the PC imo.
This card can scale closer to an XT with a proper overclock and the power slider turned to max in Adrenaline. I would say the PS5 is closer to the 6650 because the 6700 still scales higher than it in turns of raw graphics horsepower.
a lot of these games you tested on PS5 have a unlocked VRR mode witch shows the games true framerate instead of that locked 60fps. could have potentially gotn more accurate comparison results
Got this card in January, played all the games i've missed over the years of laptop-only gaming. The temps are a little high, but overall the performance is enough to not think about settings in a majority of games I play even in 1440p!
Can you buy this equivalent PC for $500? 90% of gamers do not build their own PC, so can the Ps5 equivalent PC be put together by Gateway and bought from Walmart for $500 like a PS5 can?
10 years ago people also called the Radeon 7870 the PS4 GPU but today that gpu can hardly run Resident evil four remake at 540p low 15fps or cannot even run games like Hogwarts Legacy or dead island 2 while the base PS4 is putting putting out impressive results even today. You can never compare console to pcs spec to spec. PCs are not efficient and not prioritized by developers
@@محمدالصوالحة-ت3ش It's because of no Vram, it's because of no dev prioritising 10 year old pc GPUs and it's because of PCs not being efficient. AAA Devs don't care about PC Gaming. Look at the new Mortal Kombat 1 that got revealed, PS5 version is developed by Netherealm studios themselves while the PC version is developed by some third party guys. Big companies don't care about PC Gaming
@@محمدالصوالحة-ت3ش 980 doesn't count since it launched much later and it was extremely overpriced. We are comparing 10 year old pc Vs 10 year old console
6700 XT here. With a little OC and undervolt, this is a better card than I thought, upgraded from 1080 Ti. I play at 4K60 and with little tweaking, even most new titles run at stable 60fps.
i gotta say that consoles are super impressive with the performance it offers for the price. I had a 1080 rig that I just was really unsatisfied with playing warzone 2. ending up buying a ps5 to hold me off and it ran beautifully at 4k 120fps. with all the upscaling and rendering tricks and optimizations the game looked like it was playing in ultra and it ran really smoothly. ended up getting a new computer with a 6900xt and I actually still preferred to play on the PS5 after that. it's always a bit sad to see how much tweaking, fine tuning, and pit falls there are in PC hardware and gaming, and I'm definitely impressed with current gen consoles.
The problem with the consoles are the power restrictions. 200w for the entire system is a major bottleneck. So you can't compare unless you are able to work out how much power the 4700g CPU and other components in the console is using and then power limiting the GPU to match the remainder.
@@IcebergTechit really cant be a fair comparison. The chips made for the consoles are bought in large numbers even before the ps5 or xbox are sold to consumers therefore only the best of the best silicon is being used in consoles. You would need to get the closest PC equivalent that is also the best binned and even then its not covering the software advantage of the consoles.
I actually have this card in my PC rn and I love it, and realistically I only play mostly games finely at 1080p and the fact that I can play a lot of my retro games at 4k, Im happy and not complaining
Its closest to a 5700xt because of its architecture, not a 6700. It may outperform a 5700xt on crossplatform games because developers dont optimise for PC's.
Yeah but sadly you have to give up having ownership of your own device with all the restrictions and anti repair measures they include. Plus you can't play online games without paying extra and games cost more overall. I see consoles as a subscription service so over the maybe 8 years of a consoles lifespan you end up paying more than buying an equally powerful PC at the time of the consoles release. 480 for online capability alone.
Pretty bad video overall. 80MB Infinity Cache won't make up for the PS5 having 40% more bandwidth. Plus some of the games you tested such as TLOU, Spider-Man, and Uncharted failed to hit 60fps at 1440p on the 6700XT, whereas they're 60-80fps on PS5 when you unlock the frame rate with a 120Hz display. The 6700 isn't all that close to a PS5 in real-life scenarios and gets brutalized at higher resolutions due to its low bandwidth.
That's entirely untrue, those games you picked are literally former console exclusives, of course they are going to run better on the ps5. And yes, the infinity cache does make up for it, there's a reason why the 6600xt is still better than the 3060 despite having a lower memory bandwidth by about 40%
Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us Part 1 are poorly optimized games on PC, they are bad ports from a terrible company, the same one that did the PC port of Batman. In the rest of the games, the performance is similar. In A Plague Tale: Requiem, nobody knows what upscaling is used, but it's probably a cheap image scaling, not temporal upscaling that has computational weight. In the Digital Foundry comparison, DLSS 1440p with DLSS in performance mode delivered a superior image compared to the quality mode on consoles in A plague tale.
Digital foundry did a video about what gpu performance equals the ps5 and XBSX, it was the RTX 2060 super or 5600 for amd. The 6700xt is mad overkill in terms of performance to that lol.
In AC:Vallhalla, TLOU, Hogwarts, Spider Man, Uncharted Legacy, Death Stranding ... it is on par or surpasses 2080s ! I belive some VR devs (especially Pavlov) also mentioned because of focus-rendering ps5 beats 3090 level of performances. Of course it is just VR but still... People jumped the bang wagon too quickly when the consoles first came. Gamer Nexus literally said sometimes 1060 can beat PS5 and I believe people went riot because of those early vids. And now, we can see how far it can go. Jedi Suvivor, Dead Space Remake, Callisto Protocol ps5 mostly beats 2080-2080s with ease. Yeah yeah, developers can't optimization blah blah blah ...
@@ammanus356 dude it’s a closed off platform, they can optimize it to run a bit better than on pc, especially first party games. Some of their first party games had checkerboarding upscaling which weren’t on pc.
@@morrays1996 Dude actually watch digital foundry instead of lyjng. It has never ran like a 2060. Im mainly on a 4090 and never feel the need to make up shit
@@ammanus356 no dude they’ve done console pc performance at the beginning of the console generations where they match up performers in ports and state which card it runs most like. Even digital foundry did a video comparing gpu performance. Same with gamersnexus I have no horse in this race man. I got a 4090 and a ps5 bruh 😂😩😩
The PS5 GPU is more like an RX 5700 with some RDNA 2 features, there are plenty of die shots which show an almost identical layout. Along with Infinity Cache the RX 6700 has newer fixed function units that support hardware VRS and Sampler Feedback.
Modified RX 5700 is the PS5 GPU with extra things added to it look at the naming nomenclature, Cache, shaders, tmus, rops, feature level, L1, L2 cache Source Techpowerup. Also lack of L3 caché wich is featured on all rdna 2 gpus
New editing style? Alright! Keep on improving and find your footing. Including the song titles is a nice addition. Ps.: I just saw bit of money traveling out of my account and didn't know why. Kind of upset, i had a look. ,,Patreon? OOHH Iceberg! Maybe he has a new video out?" Now i am here. :,D
I have an XFX RX 6700, and while people, including Iceberg, would say to check your used market, I think it was one of the best price/performance GPUs I could have bought new in the US. I could see myself only upgrading if I wanted Nvidia's better raytracing support or DLSS, or if I got a 1440p monitor.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
ERRATA
17:52 "Proprietary" is apparently not the correct word. Nvidia never owned RT.
19:48 should read AVG 38.4 0.1% 29.2
21:03 I said “RTAO”, I meant “RTGI”
29:55 I forgot to add the track name for the background music. It’s “The Doc Will See You Now” by Backingtrack
DRINKING GAME:
Do a shot whenever I say “Resolution”, “PS5” or “Console”
Should I buy a 2080 ti? Found one for around 330 USD on eBay and was wondering if it was worth the price for it
nice
@@TheRealNeoFrancois I've never tried one, but I'm sure it's a great card. $330 seems about right for a Buy It Now price.
@@TheRealNeoFrancois I highly suggest to invest that 330$ to a newer gen card..
@@benuten3907 about the only thing I could recommend at that price point that's newer is a 6700 XT
I can't believe AMD is able to release integrated graphics that powerful for consoles yet we are barely getting chips that match last gen consoles on PC.
Have you seen what a recent high end PC can do?
I was talking about integrated graphics in particular. PC APUs are very unbalanced, the most expensive models have very powerful CPUs but GPU wise can barely match a PS4. It should be the other way around for gaming.
With decent APUs there would be no need for entry level graphics cards. And lots of PC gamers would appreciate that as The entry level GPU market has stagnated.
@@87crimson apple does powerful SOCs. would be nice if amd did too. the problem with that is that it's not as simple as just wanting to do it. the system is heavily ram-limited, so there's not much point in getting a faster APU without integrating faster memory on the SOC, at which point it might exceed the price of an entry level gpu + a good cpu, rendering it kinda moot
@@87crimson What? The 680m and 780m mobile igpus have not launched yet, they should be out later this fall. There are a few videos of the 780m in action and it's pretty mindblowing what it can do with 25w.
cause its gonna cost a ton to release this on mainstream consumers just like steam deck they are losing money to build this but their brands is way too big to compensate with that
32 Minutes?! Holy moly, you put in so much effort - your channel is seriously underrated, great video!
IMO Iceberg is one of the best tech youtubers out there. I like how he benchmarks and tests different hardware from different generations.
Definitely an all star
ahri pfp 😳❤️🦊
except that the PS5 is more a 5700xt
31 sec too
Damn, dude your channel has been quite unique. I've been building and following computers for almost 7 years, and the amount of unique content I see for a smaller channel is staggering. Please keep doing this. Its awesome to have niche filled by somebody whose super passionate about their craft like you!
The growth this channel has been seeing, I doubt it'll be smaller for much longer.
No offense but whats niche, benchmarks and commentary with parts both new and old? theres kind of a million and one channels doing it. Buildzoid aka actually hardcore overclocking is niche, the derbauers of the world are niche, this is dime a dozen.
@El Cactuar Got nothing else better to do with your time? Obviously reading isn't your strong suit.
@El Cactuar Lmfao whatever helps you sleep at night kiddo.
You deserve so much more attention. This is exactly the range of performance and price that most people are in, not the bleeding edge of LTT or the chromebook flash gaming of middle school. Thank you for making important videos.
I don’t agree with the LTT comment, only because they don’t cover this kind of stuff at all.
LTT actually does make videos on budget friendly stuff too tho@@robertt9342
The RX 6700...the PS5 GPU. This is the best RDNA2 GPU that is available in my super small nano country. If my RX 5700XT breaks before my planned upgrade, then I either get a RX 6800 or 6700 XT.
6700XT is fantastic, and is aging quite well too. Here’s hoping your 5700XT lasts many more years though
I'd suggest waiting for 7700xt
@@alangeorge5592 I meant if it breaks and the current present, my planned upgrade will be in 2 years
If there is a 7700x with 16 GB VRAM, then yes, only if the 5700 XT breaks.
Had to edit my original comment!
6750 xt is good too
@@eliasroflchopper3006 Yes, that as well.
ive considered picking this card up but my budget didn allowed it at the time,so i went with the 6600 instead.Amd is kill1ng on the used market, and late this year im getting a 6800 or 6800xt.But the 6700xt is a solid upgrade too.
same here , back then during the mining craze rx 6600 non xt are already costing around 400 usd
Hopefully you are on a Gen4 setup cause the 8x bus on the 6600/6600xt/6650xt are a much greater concern then running a 16x card like a 6700 on a older gen3 system. Doom Eternal for example is a game that has huge performance gains on Gen4 with 8x cards.
@@45eno 6700xt on pcie 3.0 vs 4.0 is maybe like 2 fps difference. Lmao
@@BigBlackChicks again I wrote that for exactly people like you that don’t understand. Reread what I wrote. People like you that confuse those results. My main point was not 16x Gen 3 vs 16x Gen 4 but 8x cards. I said to get a 16x card if running on older gen3 so you don’t take a double performance hit from gen3 AND 8x bus speeds. Most people like you confuse gen3 vs Gen4 data as you are only factoring in two 16x cards. I was telling people to not buy 6600 8x cards on gen3 , 6700 16x cards handle the gen3 bandwidth reduction way better.
i got the white hellhound 6700xt used for 270 USD
Another great video! Keep up the great work good sir!
Great Video! And massive respect for putting in the work to not only produce a high quality, very long video but also leave timelines in the video and leave corrections/music in the description/comment section.
This gpu from amd saved me, the price in my country was (and depending on the gpu still is) very expensive for what the gpus delivered in terms of performance, the rx 6600 was my only and initial choice, and it's already a great one gpu, but in the middle of nowhere the rx 6700 appeared on the market for just 335$ and with practically identical performance to that of the rtx 3060 ti.
when you said "identical performance to that of the rtx 3060 ti" i thought it was a stretch but after seeing some benchmarks you're pretty much right, i guess you're only missing out on DLSS
@@BanHelsing Yes, comparing the tests with dlss from nvidia, I have a little less fps, but considering the price of rx 6700, with the rtx 3060 ti, it's better to get the 6700, because I'm not a streamer either, just a casual gamer, so I don't need nvidia technologies like Broadcast or nvenc. But anyway, from now on maybe it's worth getting the rtx 3060 ti, because it's dropping in price every day, due to the launch of the rtx 4060 ti, but it's still a little more expensive than the rx 6700.
@@salvadorvasconcelos6145 what did you have before the 6700?
@@BanHelsing Yeah, before I built a new pc
earlier this year, I used the integrated graphics of an Intel Core i5-4460T, then in the end, I used the Intel HD Graphics 4600, I know it was very very bad.
@@salvadorvasconcelos6145 well in that case it doesn't really matter if you got a 3060ti or a 6700 the upgrade is still huge
Ever since I first heard about this card I had been waiting for a video actually comparing it to the PS5. Great to see how it compares as close as the settings/PC optimizations can match. Looking forward to the video with both the 4700G and 6700!
Love that you mentioned RandomGamingInHD. Just like my 6800 I feel the 6700 doesn't get much love.
This is an excellent review and it shows you have put a great amount of work into this. You've earned the sub! That being said, I've been running the Powercolor version of this card for the past 6 months or so, and it's an excellent low to mid-level performer. I really don't understand why these cards are so obscure, as it found a great balance between performance (not on 4K, but decent on 1440p) and price, especially up until around 6 months ago. Thanks for putting some extra focus on it!
I wouldn't classify a 6700 as low to mid-level though. I get you might want to set something stronger as the mid benchmark, but still.
I love how I tried searching for a vid like this & found nothing. I check my feed & it finally recommends me
32 min video. Doesn't get much better than that. Thanks brother.
This was a fantastic watch. You've earned my sub!
So due to bad optimization on PC, you might need a 6700xt to get more of a PS5 experience for the newest games.
No u dkn't cause ps5 run tge game at 720p then upscale them to 1080p@60fps or 4k@30fps and in recejt titles like alan wake 2 and starfield it will run it at 720p and upscale it to 1080p@30ich fps
Or 480p upscaled to 4k@25fps (keep in mind the settings will be somewhere around low and mid settings)
@@JustARandomGuy0911 yeah that's what they want you to believe lmao
I have an RX 6700 and it’s great because it’s a value 1440p card that only requires one PCIE cable which allows me to run it on a lower powered psu. It should have at least a 600 watt, but works with no issues on a 430 watt psu. I plan to upgrade the psu, but even while running RDR2, it has never crashed on me. Great performance for a great price and low power consumption.
What cpu u using with it
RTX 4070 also only requires one PCIE cable and has way more performance and is actually a 1440p capable card.
@@portman8909 and is double the price. not comparable at all
This is the card I'm buying next week. Haven't seen a better deal price to performance wise.
Edit: I ended up waiting for the 7800XT to release and got it for £450 on black Friday.
I've used if for about 6 months, sadly I only had a 1080p monitor so I can't say much for higher resolutions, but at 1080p it's a phenomenal gpu. The XFX model runs super cool and quiet too.
I have the Sapphire Pulse 6700 and it runs very well, and at 2519 MHz all the time when GPU limited, doesnt seem to happen to reviewers though.
The rx 6800 xt is the best price to performance card.
Great stuff! Thanks for the video, super interesting, keep it up :)
This content is STELLAR. I love seeing older hardware matched up against new stuff. Goes to show you dont need top of the line and $1k to build a solid gaming PC. My interest has always been in the xeons, but your coverage has been stellar! Would be nice to compare these older xeons to stuff like i7 8700 (non-k or k) and ryzen 5 2600/3600s. Was also curious how the RX 6700 faired against your 3070 (without RT). Also certain V2 CPUs that were more obscure like the 2667v2. Thank You for all your content!
The 3070 demolishes the 6700, it also beats the 6700xt (except when its 8gb aren't enough).
A more appropriate AMD equivalent would be the rx 6800. I actually went for a 6800 because it was cheaper than the 3070 at the time
the 3070 does not "demolish" a 6700 and it about on par with a 6700xt xD
This channel deserves way more subs. Excellent work!
The bus width makes all the difference in a comparison. Memory throughput is still really potent in gaming performance, on the GPU side of things.
finally someone did this. I was wondering why in 2,5 years still no one made a video such this
This card was released in November 2022. Maybe there wasn't anything else that matched the PS5's specs.
Bought my lil brother a 6700 for his pc i built him for Christmas. For 1080p that card is little beast! so far hes told me he hasnt found a game that he couldnt run on maxed settings with 100+ fps
i cant thank you enough for bringing back this song, awesome video
I have been looking for a video like this as I own a PS5 and a PC and wanted a real life comparison instead of just specs. Thanks a ton!
Gamers nexus has a great video about this. They peg the hardware much lower
@@justinoff1 gamer's nexus' video on this was horrible. i was genuienly baffled by how bad and biased it was. it was so bad i remember it years after. they claimed that pc settings were matched to ps5 yet literally on the first test (dmc5) they test gtx 1060 at 1080p resolution for 120fps test while ps5 is at 4K checkerboard resolution targeting 120 fps. that resolution difference is no joke. around x2.2 raw pixel count difference.
They do the same on dirt5 while ps5 runs at dynamic 1440p for 120fps they lock the gtx 1080 to 1080p. all they did was ''match the settings'' but not the resolution which is like the biggest performance cause. steve claims in the same video a gtx 1070 performed too well to compare it to ps5 so thats why they went with a 1060 on dmc5. i had an rx 580 at the time of that video which is equal if not better than 1060 and i actually tried the real resolution targets on dmc5 on 4K to match the console targets and my rx 580 was asking to die. i lost all respect for gamer's nexus and steve after that video and never watched a single of their videos ever since.
No matter what platform you favor, being biased is not something you drip your feet in. just look at this video to see how absurd GN's video was. In this vid, ps5 matches and sometimes beats the RX 6700. RX 6700 beats 3060 on raw rasterization as well. multiple credible people on Digital foundry compares ps5 and series X to 2070 and 3060. steve was the only one and still is aside from some weirdos on his comment section to claim such weird things and literally no one called him out on it either.
@@EfecanYSL I completely agree with you👍
@@EfecanYSL Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us Part 1 are poorly optimized games on PC, they are bad ports from a terrible company, the same one that did the PC port of Batman. In the rest of the games, the performance is similar. In A Plague Tale: Requiem, nobody knows what upscaling is used, but it's probably a cheap image scaling, not temporal upscaling that has computational weight. In the Digital Foundry comparison, DLSS 1440p with DLSS in performance mode delivered a superior image compared to the quality mode on consoles in A plague tale.
one correction, 17:50 ray tracing was never proprietary nvidia technology. they released it along side direct x ray tracing and also vulkan rt. That's why old rt titles work with all graphics cards
There were a bunch of weird mistakes like this one in the video.
What an incredible video. It hit literally every point I had in my head and I was sure you'll miss this game but then you show it ok but then you won't cover this but nope you did it. You made your points so clear and concise and did everything exactly as one would expect for these things to go. Amazing work dude! Keep it up.
Great channel, awesome background music and content. Cant believe you dont gave over 100k subs yet. Subscribed.
I have the 6700 PowerColor Fighter version - it looks ugly lol but I'm really happy with performance although it runs a bit hotter than your sapphire variant. The pricing is a bit off at the moment but last year I paid £290 brand new. I use it for 1080p High detail gaming - it absolutely shreds everything I throw at it.
Fantastic video as always. I'm a new subscriber and really enjoy the high quality work you put in these.
How hot it runs?
@@NexY92 71C under full load, 90c hotspot. That is with meshify C 2x140mm intake and 2x120mm exhaust and fan curves following GPU temp. You can drop this by undervolting but I haven't played around with this yet.
@@gregciuba2172 NOT that bad tbh TY
Ugly? It looks great. Finally a simply design and not "gamer" bs
I have the XT version of that card, nothing else to complain except its crappy cooler. I play at 4K60 and with FSR quality, even newer games are fine.
I love your videos. Hilarious prose, great grammar, great delivery. And the content just gets better and better! One nit to pick: I know this is a performance simulation, but the hard thing is to normalise for image quality, and then compare performance. I don't even know how would would begin to do that.
Proud owner of this beast, sure is a sweet upgrade from that ancient GTX 1050 2GB I was stretching thin until earlier this year.
Is it specifically the Sapphire Pulse version? What's your max edge to hotspot delta at stock when gaming?
It's the XFX Speedster SWFT 309 model. I don't measure junction temperatures, MSI just reports under 70°C when playing games.
A half hour video? You spoil us Mr. Iceberg!
I’ve looked at this card a lot. I love my RX 6600, it serves all my needs, and I’m so thankful for my slightly-better-off friend who got it for me as a birthday gift, but I’ve thought long and hard about upgrading to the 6700 so I can give the 6600 to another mutual friend for their birthday and upgrade them from their GTX 1060 6GB. Unfortunately, I feel I should wait for something a little more worthwhile if I’m going to upgrade at all as I want something from team red that has support for AV1 encode, so perhaps an RX 7600/XT if it’s good and worth it or an RX 8600/XT if it’s not lol.
When using AMD shadows will kill it more than textures ,AMD does well with textures where Nvidia hates textures and other effects due to Vram but does well with RT
14:50 funny enough, even a 1660 Super can chug through Gof of War on 4K at pretty stable 30 FPS, well makes sense as the 1660 Super is more powerful than a PS4 Pro and PS4 Pro plays it at 1440p 30 FPS
I have the XFX version of this card. I was. Confused the day I saw it in my local Best Buy, cuz I never heard of it either. Great upgrade from my 1050ti
You've never heard of AMD? 😂
01:10 - That jab at Austin Evans was mean.
Well done :D .
A few months back he made a little anti-British jibe in one of his videos, so I'm glad to return the favour 😉
I have this card paired with a R5 5600, I can say that it's a beast of a GPU for 250 euros(that much I paid for it, on a clearence deal)
Same here. More affordable than console yet everyone talking about how consoles are cheap. Not at all.
Especeally if you can download games with torrent. 🎉
wow this blew up super happy for you
Great content and production quality. I've been interested in the RX 6700 10GB for some time now. However, recently I've noticed that the 12GB (XT) model from the same brand (10GB Sapphire vs. 12GB Sapphire) is only $20-ish to $30-ish USD higher. And it's one of the rare occurrences were that 8-10% increase in price will buy you _At Least_ the same amount of performance increase, and often more. The only reason I can see to get a 10GB model is there are are more of those models with only two fans. Which might be a requirement in certain situations. They're a fantastic card for ITX builds. They produce slightly less heat stock, and undervolt very well. But, the 12GB (XT) card is significantly better for not much more money. Just my 2¢
I had a 6700xt with two fan setup, Sapphire Pulse version
@@Weather_Nerd There are a few, two fan, 6700 XT's out there. I think the MSI MECH version was another. But most AIB's cards are 3-fan. Has it been reliable for you?
Bro earned a sub for a well done video essay.
Be nice to see the ppwer draw comparison while getting the similar performance.
31:50 I too did think about it the 1st time I heard about the RX 6700 GPU and saw its specs...
What I didn't expect is that I'd have to wait this long for someone to figure that 1+1=2 and do a video about it!...
For those upgrading older systems on Gen3 motherboards they should go for this 16x 6700 vs the similar priced 8x 6650xt. Running a 8x Gen4 card on gen3 is equivalent to 16x gen2 bus speeds. Most people dismiss Gen4 concerns because of what they have seen in comparison videos but what they fail to realize is most of those is 16x gen3 vs 16x Gen4. 8x cards like 6650xt on gen3 is a much bigger bandwidth hit then what they see in normal comparison videos.
The l3 cache😂
Great video
The 6700 non xt 10gb are all over in best buys where I live. I built my children pcs with i3 12100fs and a 6700 non 10gb they can play 1080p maxed out on almost any games without worry of fps. Clocking the gpu works best on adrenaline drivers btw
lol that's very good.
You are a good parent, glad that you gave your children the best of their childhood
Such nice b-roll
Yo thanks for making this video. I’ve always been looking for how PC GPUs and Console GPUs fared with each other and nice to see how PC still holds up. Cheers Man 🎉🎉
its always a treat when u upload
Awesome video Iceberg! Love the comparisons. I had a question about TLOU. How come RAM usage was about 23GB at 1440, while it was only about 10GB at 4K? Is it because the targeted framerate was lower at 4K? Crazy how huge of a difference it was. Thanks!
Holy smoke, what a great video. Thanks a lot for your work.
Nice vid. It seems the 16GB cards would be more than enough for the next 5 years if a 10GB is this good
very high quality video mate, good job
I bought the 6600XT a month before the 6700's release, for the same price 😭
i bet this was the most self asked question of what the console GPU counterpart, and its soo underrated that it took this long for someone to upload this.
PS5 CPU is AMD 4700S released only in China. which is equivalent to desktop 3600 in terms of Cinebench score.
Yeah
It released in Indonesia too
@@speedfastestsolo in a form of sh*tt* amd kit that barely sells here
Might physically be closer to the 3700X due to the 8c/16t, but the 3700X can probably run a bit faster.
Why are you using Afterburner w/ an AMD card? You have all the OC needs within the driver Adrenalin software
Variable Rate Shading is available in some games if you enable Radeon Boost in a DX12 title.
Just keep making content. This channel is going to be a big hit.
I have the rx 6700 in my system. I have the sapphire pulse version of it and it is a nice graphics card.
same here. It's the best GPU for 1080/1440
Damn consoles are stepping up, 4k60 fps on medium-high, and on most just high 4k or 2k butter 60. That's Hella impressive for the price
Iceberg, maybe use adrenaline for better control on the OC. It usually works for me but ymmv
Good call, thanks
Awesome video man! Can you tell us what're the names of the songs you use in these videos? They're awesome and I'd like to hear more of em!
Considering how much more console games tend to be optimized, it's quite impressive on both ends. The PS5 and Xbox being power restricted and this card for having to deal with not perfect optimization. I'd say in reality it probably means this card is stronger overall but won't be seen really in practice due to differing levels of optimization.
Still, the PS5 and Xbox do provide killer value, but you can do a lot more with a PC - the simple act of modding is a huge point in favor of the PC imo.
And he was handicapping the card by downclocking it too. The 6700 XT seems to be the best bang for bang across generations and vendors atm
This card can scale closer to an XT with a proper overclock and the power slider turned to max in Adrenaline. I would say the PS5 is closer to the 6650 because the 6700 still scales higher than it in turns of raw graphics horsepower.
I really want this GPU. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any non XT variants of 6700 here in Indonesia (Also great video as always)
a lot of these games you tested on PS5 have a unlocked VRR mode witch shows the games true framerate instead of that locked 60fps. could have potentially gotn more accurate comparison results
Tbh I'm a little confused as to why Uncharted 4 can't be run at 4k60, isn't it supposed to be an upgrade from the PS4 Pro?
Got this card in January, played all the games i've missed over the years of laptop-only gaming. The temps are a little high, but overall the performance is enough to not think about settings in a majority of games I play even in 1440p!
My God man I can't get over the Pulse Design
Just bought one of these used for $210usd. $227usd with tax
Can you buy this equivalent PC for $500?
90% of gamers do not build their own PC, so can the Ps5 equivalent PC be put together by Gateway and bought from Walmart for $500 like a PS5 can?
@@Crashed131963what's wrong with you console fanboy
This channel like watching good old TV show about gaming.
I have one and got it for $280.00 USD. It’s an amazing, over-performing little beast.
Currently it’s listed at this price on amazon.
That’s right! 😎
Great video on a very interesting topic. Loved every bit. Subbed and liked .
10 years ago people also called the Radeon 7870 the PS4 GPU but today that gpu can hardly run Resident evil four remake at 540p low 15fps or cannot even run games like Hogwarts Legacy or dead island 2 while the base PS4 is putting putting out impressive results even today. You can never compare console to pcs spec to spec. PCs are not efficient and not prioritized by developers
Even 7970 is slower than ps4 in some games
no because of the vram
@@محمدالصوالحة-ت3ش It's because of no Vram, it's because of no dev prioritising 10 year old pc GPUs and it's because of PCs not being efficient. AAA Devs don't care about PC Gaming. Look at the new Mortal Kombat 1 that got revealed, PS5 version is developed by Netherealm studios themselves while the PC version is developed by some third party guys. Big companies don't care about PC Gaming
@@ajdaniel8128 no and look at the gtx 980 its run games well after 8 years
@@محمدالصوالحة-ت3ش 980 doesn't count since it launched much later and it was extremely overpriced. We are comparing 10 year old pc Vs 10 year old console
@4:43 AMD's Marketing Dept: "WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!"
6700 XT here. With a little OC and undervolt, this is a better card than I thought, upgraded from 1080 Ti. I play at 4K60 and with little tweaking, even most new titles run at stable 60fps.
Full rasterization power
@@ado-ho5kh Exactly.
That's kinda a meh upgrade
Great video. I have this card about 2 month and I like it very much.
i gotta say that consoles are super impressive with the performance it offers for the price. I had a 1080 rig that I just was really unsatisfied with playing warzone 2. ending up buying a ps5 to hold me off and it ran beautifully at 4k 120fps. with all the upscaling and rendering tricks and optimizations the game looked like it was playing in ultra and it ran really smoothly. ended up getting a new computer with a 6900xt and I actually still preferred to play on the PS5 after that. it's always a bit sad to see how much tweaking, fine tuning, and pit falls there are in PC hardware and gaming, and I'm definitely impressed with current gen consoles.
because devs are lazy
@@kalibr22. I think that is a bit unfair, there’s a lot of work that devs put into games. Doesn’t make the ports good though.
The Austin Evans cameo gave me a good chuckle.
The problem with the consoles are the power restrictions. 200w for the entire system is a major bottleneck. So you can't compare unless you are able to work out how much power the 4700g CPU and other components in the console is using and then power limiting the GPU to match the remainder.
Good point, when I'm working on the console build I'll make sure to stick to a strict power limit.
@@IcebergTechit really cant be a fair comparison. The chips made for the consoles are bought in large numbers even before the ps5 or xbox are sold to consumers therefore only the best of the best silicon is being used in consoles. You would need to get the closest PC equivalent that is also the best binned and even then its not covering the software advantage of the consoles.
I actually have this card in my PC rn and I love it, and realistically I only play mostly games finely at 1080p and the fact that I can play a lot of my retro games at 4k, Im happy and not complaining
Its closest to a 5700xt because of its architecture, not a 6700. It may outperform a 5700xt on crossplatform games because developers dont optimise for PC's.
No.
Great video and explanation. I don't own a console, but you really can't beat the price to performance they offer this generation.
Yeah but sadly you have to give up having ownership of your own device with all the restrictions and anti repair measures they include. Plus you can't play online games without paying extra and games cost more overall. I see consoles as a subscription service so over the maybe 8 years of a consoles lifespan you end up paying more than buying an equally powerful PC at the time of the consoles release. 480 for online capability alone.
@Transistor Jump idk what you pay on PC. I often wait for 66 to 80 percent off sales and get my games for under 20 dollars within a year of release.
@Transistor Jump maybe if you only stick to steam
Yeah current gen console come quite beefy tbh, pleasant surprise
Pretty bad video overall. 80MB Infinity Cache won't make up for the PS5 having 40% more bandwidth. Plus some of the games you tested such as TLOU, Spider-Man, and Uncharted failed to hit 60fps at 1440p on the 6700XT, whereas they're 60-80fps on PS5 when you unlock the frame rate with a 120Hz display. The 6700 isn't all that close to a PS5 in real-life scenarios and gets brutalized at higher resolutions due to its low bandwidth.
That's entirely untrue, those games you picked are literally former console exclusives, of course they are going to run better on the ps5.
And yes, the infinity cache does make up for it, there's a reason why the 6600xt is still better than the 3060 despite having a lower memory bandwidth by about 40%
Uncharted 4 and The Last of Us Part 1 are poorly optimized games on PC, they are bad ports from a terrible company, the same one that did the PC port of Batman. In the rest of the games, the performance is similar. In A Plague Tale: Requiem, nobody knows what upscaling is used, but it's probably a cheap image scaling, not temporal upscaling that has computational weight. In the Digital Foundry comparison, DLSS 1440p with DLSS in performance mode delivered a superior image compared to the quality mode on consoles in A plague tale.
GOD ONLY KNOWS HOW MUCH I LOVE THESE KINDS OF VIDEOS
Digital foundry did a video about what gpu performance equals the ps5 and XBSX, it was the RTX 2060 super or 5600 for amd. The 6700xt is mad overkill in terms of performance to that lol.
Lies. Their Death Stranding DC pc version did this and it was 2080s to 3060ti. Rt performance is 2060
In AC:Vallhalla, TLOU, Hogwarts, Spider Man, Uncharted Legacy, Death Stranding ... it is on par or surpasses 2080s ! I belive some VR devs (especially Pavlov) also mentioned because of focus-rendering ps5 beats 3090 level of performances. Of course it is just VR but still...
People jumped the bang wagon too quickly when the consoles first came. Gamer Nexus literally said sometimes 1060 can beat PS5 and I believe people went riot because of those early vids.
And now, we can see how far it can go. Jedi Suvivor, Dead Space Remake, Callisto Protocol ps5 mostly beats 2080-2080s with ease. Yeah yeah, developers can't optimization blah blah blah ...
@@ammanus356 dude it’s a closed off platform, they can optimize it to run a bit better than on pc, especially first party games. Some of their first party games had checkerboarding upscaling which weren’t on pc.
@@morrays1996 Dude actually watch digital foundry instead of lyjng. It has never ran like a 2060. Im mainly on a 4090 and never feel the need to make up shit
@@ammanus356 no dude they’ve done console pc performance at the beginning of the console generations where they match up performers in ports and state which card it runs most like. Even digital foundry did a video comparing gpu performance. Same with gamersnexus I have no horse in this race man. I got a 4090 and a ps5 bruh 😂😩😩
you just earned a sub ! very good content. keep it up !
The PS5 GPU is more like an RX 5700 with some RDNA 2 features, there are plenty of die shots which show an almost identical layout. Along with Infinity Cache the RX 6700 has newer fixed function units that support hardware VRS and Sampler Feedback.
thought we were getting a whole ps5 pc build smh, love the detailed Video tho.
i think the PS5 is more capable than a 6700, the rtx 4070 or the upcoming A4000 seems more accurate (by performance, not what the gpu is)
LMAO
@Transistor Jump Did you had a stroke there buddy?
Actually ps5 is much weaker than 6700 xt
@@owaismanzar1310you sure? Because the 6700xt is not much better than the normal 6700
I bought that card, because i didnt have patience to wait for the 6700xt to drop to my budget.
Had if for months now and its great
Modified RX 5700 is the PS5 GPU with extra things added to it look at the naming nomenclature, Cache, shaders, tmus, rops, feature level, L1, L2 cache Source Techpowerup. Also lack of L3 caché wich is featured on all rdna 2 gpus
This card was never on my radar but now. Hell ya!
New editing style? Alright! Keep on improving and find your footing. Including the song titles is a nice addition.
Ps.: I just saw bit of money traveling out of my account and didn't know why. Kind of upset, i had a look. ,,Patreon? OOHH Iceberg! Maybe he has a new video out?" Now i am here. :,D
I have an XFX RX 6700, and while people, including Iceberg, would say to check your used market, I think it was one of the best price/performance GPUs I could have bought new in the US. I could see myself only upgrading if I wanted Nvidia's better raytracing support or DLSS, or if I got a 1440p monitor.
6700 is pretty much 1440p card tbh, also would mention that XFX card has only 138 W TDP, pretty effecient!
I've got the same one, I play all my games at 1440p at over 100fps
nice video! wildly lower bus width and vram on this gpu, definitely interesting comparison
This channel is so nice! I subbed)
Love the infinite cache bit had me 😂😂
I got this a few weeks ago and have been loving it. got it to max out at 2650mhz :)