Murdaugh juror on what convinced jury he was guilty
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 мар 2023
- A juror who convicted Alex Murdaugh on Thursday told ABC News in an exclusive interview that the piece of evidence which convinced him the disgraced lawyer was guilty, was the cellphone video placing him at the scene minutes before the murders of his wife and son.
"I was certain it was [Murdaugh's] voice," Craig Moyer, a carpenter, said as he recalled the background voice he heard during his first watch of the video captured by Murdaugh's son. The video was taken at the family's dog kennels by Paul Murdaugh, 22, who later that night was brutally murdered along with his mother Margaret, 52.
Full story: abc7chicago.com/alex-murdaugh...
Subscribe: abc7.ws/youtube
If Paul didn’t take that video for Rogan it’s very possible Alex Walks imo.
Without the video, the state would not have even had enough evidence to charge him.
Judge Newman's son died just before the trial.... imagine having to go through that while being in this trial. I'm giving a million claps for the judge for having to endure loss yet still be a professional in this high profile case.
He should have recused himself.
Judge Clifton Newman’s son died from a blood clot in his lungs or heart. Not sure. But I thought the same thing. How heartbreaking it was for him hearing of a man who shot his son for greed. Judge Newman’s son was a fine young upstanding man. Prayers for Judge Newman and his family. 😢❤
E
Thank gawd this trial got jurors like this guy that didn't get confused (as the defense team tried so hard to do) - they just need 1 juror to get confused enough).
And, seeing thru AM's embarrassing attempts at acting as well as his countless manipulation and lies.
Thank you juror for speaking up. The judge was the 🌟. He was ready for any Alex's comebacks with class and facts. Loved the way he spoke slowly and making the creep stand up for long
That's funny (if that's okay to say), "making him stand up for long;" hadn't thought of that aspect of the speech.
How does one convict when SLED did not do their job? It truly *AMAZES* me that this *NUT* of a juror did not consider that DNA, foot/fingerprints, hair samples, etc are *EXTREMELY* important and also *_IMPERATIVE_* when investigating a crime scene. One needs to rule out everyone else before convicting a man that was charged with murder. This is a great example of how innocent people end up in prison and then later released by DNA. I don't know who murdered Maggie and Paul, but they sure did *NOT* prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Murdaugh did. I hope his conviction is reversed on appeal, then the State can try again.
Another low country sympathizer
This juror is very bias and it's not hard to tell
Well from all the deaths around this guy. Idk if I would want my face or name plastered all over tv saying I helped convict him. You still have Buster on the outside along with his uncles and whoever else is tied in with them. They might make you disappear. 🤷
So, in six weeks the prosecution couldn't convince those 3 jurors that Murdaugh was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt ... But 9 fellow jurors could do it in 45 minutes? I guess they should have been at the prosecution's table instead of those 15 ganged up there.
I must have misunderstood, because it sounded like he said, the jury had a few 🐑 in that flock that went along to get along.
This is the first time an attractive woman has EVER paid any attention to him. Change my mind.
i thought someone said he said “It’s okay. I love you” to Buster
He said " I'm sorry, I love you." to Buster.
You should have asked him to define “reasonable doubt”
Agree
My thoughts and prayers are with all the victims of AM. There are many heroes in this tragedy. Mandy Matney and FITSNEWS for their extensive investigative reporting also shld not be forgotten. They uncovered more in 4yrs than anyone else had in decades. Including those who work for the agencies that ignored every red flag that came across their desk. If just 1 person from Palmetto Bank, if 1 suspicious officer, law partner, if just 1 person in the last 20yrs acted lives could’ve been saved. Watching this interview also left me wondering if the jury is offered any assistance like counseling they may need after viewing all this evidence, it has to had a traumatic impact for those women and men🙏🏽💜
He is a lawyer of course he is gonna play it up ..
This juror is so authentic. Love it.
hes a cutie
His name is AleX. Why does everyone call him AleC? I mean I get he’s a murderer but cmon man. Why is everyone so illiterate?
That's what he goes by. Everyone knows his name is Alex, but locally they call him Alec.
It was the first thing that bothered me about him lol!! Also his last name Murdaugh pronounced “murdOCK” i don’t get either. I think this dude just felt he was above all rules, even those of normal pronunciation…
His govt name is Richard. Why call him Alex?
I don’t get “Murdock” either
he thought Alec sounded more Hollywood 😂
There were three people there. Two dead. The math is simple
This is a bit odd to see because in my country, jurors can't talk about the deliberation AT ALL. It's a full blown crime for a juror to talk to the press here. I did jury duty when I was a student and I can never share why we got to the verdict we did.
Craig Moyer is what South Carolina is. A blue collar hard working guy. And no BS. You cannot BS that dude. And Alex tried to.
If a murderer was on Paul's phone minutes before the murder , why would he LEAVE the phone-ah .
This man was found guilty out of jealousy and for other crimes that he committed , not murder . Maybe I don't have the facts on the minutes between the kennels and when he left to visit the mom . Where were the two rifles used . In his hands when he was at the kennels ?!?! Hidden so he could find them ?! ?!
He could have left to visit his mom and a murderer or two murderers could have been waiting , sparing him so he would suffer as they suffered when they didn't have the money that he stole from him . Some had family medical issues going on .
I just dont see him doing it . And this coverage ? " He admitted it was him " what - in the video or " him " the murderer . Poor poor interview considering the clarity that needed to be had . He admitted that he lied bc especially as an attorney he knew being on the video would incriminate him . I want to think thar he left and I think that someone else was there .
The questionable behavior for me was getting Buster back into law school over and above finding out who killed his wife and child. A BRAIN SCAN WOULD PROVE PSYCOPATHY - NO ACTIVITY IN AREA RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPASSION AND EMPATHY . It would support, not prove , but support guilt.
But everyone has their own way to grieve . He might have been blocking it out and focusing on something else .
I hope you're never on a jury.
@GoldenGamer and if I ever am , I will have more facts than I did when I typed that comment. I'm not so sure now .
And I have been thinking the same thing about ppl like you- I hope they are never on a jury . Those jury ? One man judged him bc he didn't see tears in his eyes . That's a problem. I'm sure you would have done the same thing . Find some more cases so you can jump in with "guilty " right away . In the meantime , don't harass me .
Killed his housekeeper and nephew too.
"Come clean or don't come at all" (JT Money)
They should've picked a different jurior to explain the verdict js.
Thank God the jury saw his fake tears for what they were!
So, after all of the testimonies and the son’s video, two people still thought he hadn’t done it. It’s pretty scary to think there are people on juries who are that deficient in evaluative skills and perception.
They were looking at the shocking procedural anomalies.
This juror should have been rejected he sounds crude and disturbed
I still do not believe HE done it himself. I feel like SLED let Paul and Maggie down
It is a little disturbing that the jury did not go over evidence in deliberations.
If you are a jury, you do not condemn a person because you do not like it, you condemn him based on the evidence that shows that he is guilty and in this case there was nothing.
D. Parks,
I agree.
He was overwhelmingly guilty
I’ve been saying to leave me off your camera a long time. I was secluded for 17 years. You should be held accountable 👨⚕️👮🏿♀️
What?
They always try to fake an alibi.
until the day two tiny vigilantes come forward with a confession,
Of course Toby was part of the jury
Curious, why do you say this?
Thank goodness that they didn't voir dire the jurors individually as its obvious this guy is a hillbilly. Would not have been my choice of a juror, but thats South Carolina for ya, voir dire is VERY informal, whereas in my State, both the Defense and Prosecution get to ask individual questions to each potential juror and can take days to pick a jury. Obviously, this guy didn't understand the definition of EVIDENCE, because there was no evidence that proves Murdaugh pulled the trigger.
You call someone a "hillbilly", but you spell *voir dire* incorrectly (twice). Priceless. And, note: the burden on the prosecution is to prove Murdaugh's guilt "beyond reasonable doubt". A jury of his peers believed that the prosecution did so, and convicted him. In addition, the judge, in denying the defense's request for a mistrial, says, "......the evidence of guilt is overwhelming". The defense has stated that they will file an appeal. Maybe they'll do their voir dire differently. Or their (ahem) *vior dire*...... as some would have it.
Robin,
I agree.
@@janalva171
Well, the other juror who spoke publicly
insisted that his last name NOT be used.
However, his photo is all over tv and all
over social media...
BRILLIANT?
You are attacking this guy's intelligence, and trying to throw words like voir dire around to sound smart, but you can't even spell it? Wow.
@@lavenderstripes Obviously Voir Dire is a *VERY BIG* word for you. A little FYI - VD is a term used daily in America in and outside the courtroom to include Government classes! All you've proven is that you're extremely *jealous* that you are unable to write something as, *INTELLIGENT* - articulate, and accurate as the original poster. I suggest you work on saying something intelligent! Thx
So Alec is guilty of being at kennels....in 911 call he did say he saw Maggie in person.
So sad that jurors found him guilty of murder without any clear evidence.
How would they act after losing their close family???
He. Cried if you didn't see it it's because you had him at guilty before the trial even started.
How can you sleep at night...there's a murderer out there that got away...so sad.
No justice for Maggie and Paul!!
I did not watch alot of this. I do have a question. Why didn't he kill the other son too?
Most of what he says isn't evidence, just impressions
What an awful jury. He made a decision based on his emotions. Glad we have a judge system
When he payed someone to shoot him in the head you knew he had lost his mind. He needs to be evaluated and put away before this happened. The man he hired should be held accountable.
This Jury used good ole common sense" as they had to watch his snotty nose in place of tears had to be torture for all of them knowing what a liar and evil man that was in front of them.
i thought a jury had to be unanimous? and if they changed from not guilty to guilty in a hour of being peer pressured ... that's suppppper jacked up
They were polled. Their final unanimous verdict was guilty. Maybe you have never set on a jury. Votes change as the evidence is discussed.
From what I understand, that was just a first initial poll to read how everyone was leaning before they discussed and went over the evidence together so it’s not that any one would be pressured, just being able to finally talk it out with others after weeks helps piece things together better for a fuller picture to decide on.
They sure as heck pressure holdouts. If not the jurors, the judge will do it. Sounds like they were quickly down 10-2.
I'm not sure peer pressure is the right word; have you ever had an opinion about something but had the sense to remain open minded and able to listen to other people's opinions - and in doing so, can better understand and rationalize the evidence and testimony they witnessed and then have a clearer understanding of why the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable doubt .
Thank gawd there are lots of good open minded jurors out there
GetnBrains,
Agree
A good liar but not good enough 👍👍
I do not like or believe this juror.
He had at guilty on day 1
God 🧐 you
Thanks for the potato resolution
If they reviewed that kennel video they would have heard 5 voices on it
Sled? Did u listen to it?
Woke george is reporting the story
The judge and jurors and defense team was excellent! I was unsure until the kennels and Alex testimony. Everyone that loved Alex were liar's except him. Shelly, the sister in law , everyone he said he didn't remember doing what they said.
I wonder if Amber Heard, gave Alex some pointers on how to testify?
Judge Newman for president!! or Supreme Court
Seriously! He is amazing! What a man
I agree, he didn’t cry, just pretended!
Pretended snot dripping from his nose and mouth? Lol
You cannot bs this dude 😂