Hydrogen Cars Aren't "Silly" - Here's Why.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- In this video, I explain why hydrogen fuel cell vehicles can actually make sense for the net-zero future, in contrast to the assumptions made by David Cebon in the open letter against the 2024 Paris Olympics! Make sure to drop me a thumbs up if you enjoyed this video! 👍
DISCLAIMER: This is NOT an investment advisory, and should not be used to make investment decisions. Commentary provided on this channel should only be considered for informational purposes. Please be aware when trading stocks, options and futures you can suffer a loss greater than your total account balance. Manage your risk accordingly and do your own due diligence before investing!
#electricvehicles #greenhydrogen
from bigger vehiculos f250 plus and up , hydrogen is the best option ..
5:30 this picture is very misleading. Its assuming that the energy density of batteries are linear and haven't or won't get better.... Well we know that picture didn't hold out because a long range model 3 weights 2200kg and does over 360+ miles. According to this it should weight about 2600kg. it might not sound like a lot but the energy density of batteries are getting better and will continue to. However. I'm an investor in both h2 and batteries. People just tend to have blinkers on and forget that technology is not linear. Moving atoms is and will always be more expensive than moving electrons. No matter how cheap h2 gets.
I agree. And the curve for hydrogen is misleading since it does not add the weight of the storage system. If you increase the amount of hydrogen you have to add more hydrogen tanks, and it is the storage systems and not the hydrogen that adds weight to the vehicle. Practical numbers shows that the Toyota Mirai has almost the same weight as a BEV of the same size. It is also stupid to use a source from 2009 since the data is based on outdated battery technology.
Fuel cell plug-in hybrid can be driven 40-50 miles per day on electricity and use hydrogen for longer trips. Thus, it retains the high efficiency of battery EV while having the convenience of a FCV and still qualifies for Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) credit.
This is the most insane video you have published to date. Toyota cannot give these cars away for between 10,000 and $15,000 per car. Your credibility is completely trashed. Yeah, let’s disagree with 120 scientist and agree with visceral ace. The lack of filling stations even in the state of California makes these vehicles completely unviable. The cost to produce hydrogen is double or triple that of electricity. I grant you that the grid may be less mature than it needs to be, but compared to hydrogen it’s 1000 times more advanced. Today I unsubscribe.
I am under the impression the only reason why FCEVs are not so popular is that 1). The H2 refill stations are well behind in the infrastructure 2). As theses Toyotas are made overseas and are not available for tax credits. 3). There is clearly interested parties or competitors engaging into media smearing tactics against H2 as an alternative.
Scarcity of infrastructure doesn't make the vehicle unviable. There are hundreds of projects and companies working to make the hydrogen "green" and the dispensers to power this car. At that level, this car is just as green as EV but with even better practical performance
$180 for a fill up 300 miles, DUH
So you rather buy 27grand EV that barely goes 300miles on a single charge? Youre broke, Id rather go Hydrogen as we can go up to 621miles on a you guessed it on a single refill.
@@zekeaffy9647”I’d rather go hydrogen” 1) you can’t because you obviously can’t afford it
2) you couldn’t even if you wanted to because it’s not a thing so your irrelevant comment is even more irrelevant 😊