Upgraded to this camera from my 5dm4 and man it’s amazing. The colors out the camera are so balanced, the autofocus is amazing, and it’s bringing new life out of my EF lenses. Highly recommend.
Hi! Thanks for your comment. I'm considering going to the R6-II but I'm happy with my 5D4, although I didn't find any comparison between those cameras. For the other commenter, you need the Canon EF to RF Adapter to use your EF lenses (there are 3 models of adapter, depending your needs or like)
Great review, James! Being more focused on video, I decided to upgrade from Mk I to Mk II for obvious reasons... but then Lumix came with the S5 mark II and I was thinking of switching. Now listening to you, the one who used all three cameras, and other reviewers as well, I'm glad that I didn't rush the switch. I'm overall happy with it but there are still annoyances that you mentioned when connecting it to an external monitor and the micro HDMI connector.
Thank you for watching Alex! The external monitor is absolutely my biggest gripe. Seems like such an unnecessary flaw. The S5II is great but the Canon is just a lot more refined and nicer to use in my opinion. For my workflow I’ll take the uncropped 50p also.
I just got my R6 Mark II and your videos have made it very easy for me to understand the mechanics. Thanks for the insights. A total newbie with whatsoever no experience with these camera :)
Upgraded to R6II from a 250D. I fell in love with photography again. The focus, the setting, the feel, how i can trust and rely on her and focus on my shooting. Great pick.
I have 250d right now, can you tell how much difference did it make? I bought sigma 24-105mm f4 few days ago but I see from there lack of quality from 250d, a lot of pictures were out of focus.
Good review, I just made the step to full frame. I had a 90D and moved to the R6 MkII. So far the 24 MegaPixel is more than enough. The dynamic range is great and the ergonomics is like the 90D which is a great plus. I am still going through a steep learning curve.
Great video! In my use case, I felt kinda bad that I missed the Mark 2 release by a few months when I switched from M4/3 last year. I currently have the R6 with the Ninja V ecosystem to supplement its video capabilities(no overheating for me @4K 24fps so far). I'm still on the fence about upgrading tbh because of two things: (1)IPB codec and the (2)micro-HDMI, as these somehow affects the overall video workflow. In fairness, I do love the idea of no time limit on videos and the assurance of no overheating at 24fps.
I upgrade from Canon 1Dx’s to the R6II for shooting sports. There is a huge jump in AF accuracy and shooting 40 fps is amazing. All my old lens have upgraded AF. The only thing I find as a negative is the joystick on the battery grip. I mostly shoot vertical photos. The placement of the joystick is to low on the battery grip. I uncomfortably have to stretch to reach it. I have large hands I can only imagine how the experience is for people with smaller hand. Otherwise it works perfectly. I bought it instead of the R3 because I’m holding out for a used R3 and a new R1.
I’m a sports photographer, I mainly bought it because of the 40fps and the AF. I was shooting with 1Dx’s before. It has dramatically improved the AF of my old EF lenses. I’m looking to get a used R3 at some point and the R1 if it come with high frames rates. Not interested in the video functions as a top must have.
Great video! i just made the upgrade from fujifilm after many years to the R6 mkii. there is an dramatic increase in dynamic range and the quality of the files this beauty creates i still haven’t stopped to surprise me. would love to see a video of how you have set your camera up having shoot with canon for so long. Figuring out how to get the most out of the camera feels like its going to be long process Keep up the good work!
Thank you for watching! Happy to hear you're loving your R6 MKII. I'll certainly consider making a video showing my full settings but if there's anything you'd like to specifically know I'd be happy to answer!
@@JamesReader Hey again! Would love to know how you have set up the different c1/c3 custom modes and also what your dials are setup. In general what you feel works best for your workflow :)
The R6 ii looks like the best camera in its price bracket to my eyes. I did however just sell my R6 + R and just bought the R5. As I got into birding over the last years, I just felt that 20MP weren’t enough for cropping and I finally wanted to enjoy some 4K/120fps footage. I feel like I might regret not waiting for the R5 ii, but who knows when it might come out and I fear it will be quite a bit more expensive. Also my R6 and R were already loosing its value quite quickly.
R5 is still the best and 45mp is still ahead from most camera's , I sold my Canon eos R too and will upgrade to R5 for sure because R5 built quality is much better than R6 and resolution is enough for couple more years.
I know this video is a bit older but I did upgrade from the R6 to the R6MII. While I am *mostly* a hobbyist - I do second shoot for a sports (CrossFit) photographer for hire (I don't do video). I agree that the dynamic range and color of the R6MII is a noticeable improvement. While I loved my original R6 - I did find that the autofocus was disappointing with fast moving subjects despite the options of "case" scenarios to choose from. While easily worked around with the touch/drag feature - that split second could mean a missed shot; in upgrading to the R6MII - I was stunned at how appreciable the difference in autofocus, tracking, sticky-ness of the eye AF was over the original. Further - I felt like it picked up subjects at a greater distance than the original. I could have happily survived with the original R6 (although the odd colors did frustrate me) but given a particular personal challenge at the time of the R6MII release - I decided to treat myself and traded the R6 in for the upgraded MII - totally happy I did... the outlay of money was totally worth it to me.
thanks for the great and honest review. i use my r6 mostly for photos. Instead of upgrading every version like i used to do, going to use this r6 to the ground before upgrading. thanks for this! I take the occasional video,
3:24 - Holy SMOKES! The colour grading, lighting, and softness of that shot is incredible! It looks like it came from a much more expensive cinema camera - well done! The only thing I love more than your videos is my own R6 Mark II that I bought in December right after release. It's the best camera I've ever used in 18 years as a pro (and I used some of the best). Your videos sold me on the R6 when you posted the raw files vs the R5 and I upscaled them in Adobe Camera Raw and found little/no real world difference at 45 MP vs the R5 files... and when needed if I used the ACR "Enhance" feature the R6 files actually looked more detailed at 45 MP than the R5 files. Now with the R6 Mark II the result is even better and I (and others) do wonder if the AA filter is improved over the original R6. PS. I wonder if there is a way to soften highlight rolloff in the highlights for Clog3 footage? I've created a pre-LUT to "expand" dynamic range and you apply it to a node prior to grading a look or adding a look LUT. It's similar to the Phantom LUT WDR pre-Lut. It really does help soften highlights though again, that clip you showed looked amazing. And the C70 vs R6 II comparison actually was really close in my opinion.
Thank you so much DRIS! You can certainly do a lot to soften the highlight roll off, I'm pretty happy with the look I get with CLOG 3 and in general find it really easy to work with in comparison to other camera's log profiles. The only real difference to the C70 is the transition to the blown out highlights being a little more pleasing and gradual on the C70 but in the real world all these differences are so minor. Truly an awesome video camera, just wish it didn't have the external monitor issue!
Move for me was from a 5D MkII and am very pleased. Had previously dipped my toe in the mirrorless water with a EOS-M6 so not a complete mirrorless newbie but the R6 MkII ticked all the boxes for me. Very happy so far
I have the R6. R6 mk2 looks amazing but I'll wait for R5 mk2 if that ever comes out. I would like that high res sensor. Feels kinda sad that 20mp is the highest I've had on a camera. Still good enough for amazing photos but cropping is so limited. Hopefully they can sort out that stabilization wobble. Even just being able to turn it off easily, only using lens stabilization would be an ok workaround for me. That being said I dont shoot videos often.
I’ve upgraded recently from R6 and I agree with all the things you mentioned. R6MII is so convienient to use. I very much appreciate the upgraded Q menu and better button customization. I didn’t know R5 doesn’t have this limitation with external monitor. Hope Canon will resolve this with firmware update, it’s very annoying.
That false color is adjusted for clog only. They would need to implement another one for rec709. Thats why it has to be off or it would show wrong ranges. Atleast there should be a button for turning on/off view assist. That would help alot or view assist couls turn along with false color.
Mate, love your content and reviews! Thanks for that! Using the r6 mark 2 for a couple of days! Mega ..just a mega camera in my opinion! So I would like to ask you for an inside of camera settings in photo and video mode on the r6 mark 2! Looking forward to your next video! Best ✌️😎
@@JamesReader Thanks for your reply! I trying to explain it as simple as possible..For me as an advanced photographer and rookie videographer..I’m always interested how is someone like you config his camera for best experience and result!
That is an interesting fact. I thought the AA filter was removed as an integral part of the Canon design but was never sure. Is there a way to remove it all together?
I didn't upgrade from the R6 but I did upgrade from the 5D Mark iii. What a world of difference! Diving into all your videos now. My main issue so far is its has completely stopped working on my in the middle of shooting a session...twice. Only thing that got the camera back on was taking the battery in and out. Ever have this happen? Brand new batter and most up to date firmware. So I don't know what happened exactly.
I’ve upgraded from the sonyA7iii I’ve never had any interest in video, I moved as the menu system was a so much easier not only to work around but customise. So I’m happy with the version the same as you
Really good video. I shot Canon since 1992, professionally from 2001. But reluctantly switched to another system in 2019 to go mirrorless because although their camera bodies are fabulous, and I am now so tempted by this R6II, the attitude towards lens diversity within the mirrorless ecosystem really sucks. That said... it's still so very tempting.
Thank you for watching Steve! Canon's attitude towards third party lens manufacturers is definitely the biggest thing to consider when looking at the RF system right now.
@@grahamtowers5513 You do make an obvious yet valid point. But coming from a 5D system with L-Lenses, I bought into mirrorless to reduce size & weight. Whilst your suggestion does allow for a wider ecosystem to be used, and may be a temporary solution (providing the EF glass can still resolve enough not to handicap the higher count modern sensors), it doesn't make much sense. One of main attractions of mirrorless is that lighter, more compact system. For those who are specifically brand loyal, it might be an option.... but do I want to be loyal to a brand which increasing doesn't provide the best options for it's customers?.... But the new bodies are still tempting 😄
@@JamesReader Canon seems to have gone back to the 'toddler' stage of needing to learn how to share 😏. When they group up a bit more, I am sure they will tempt some of their old customers back 😄
0:38 you mention the photo upgrades, the bump in resolution and the better autofocus. what you forgot the mention is the better battery life, the R6 has a CIPA rating of 360 while the R6 Mk II has a CIPA rating of 580, which is quite the upgrade considering Canon didn't change the battery itself while the CIPA rating doesn't reflect real life use, it's still a good indication of the battery life imo
I think image quality is better in a7iv, I suppose you meant colors. definitely lumix is go to if you focus more on video ( sweet V-log). Waiting for my R6ii
I know this review is a year old but I just recently got the R6 MkII. Found a heck of a deal on a brand new US market body for $1699. My other full frame is the Canon R and I also own the R7 which I got for shooting my grandkids at school sports and also wildlife. After a few days of testing the R6 MkII I plan to sell my old R and am thinking I will also sell the R7 since the R6 MkII is excellent for shooting moving objects which is what I got the R7 for. I liked certain things about the R7 but found it a bit of a disappointment in other ways, like shutter shock and shutter roll. I also own an M6 MKII so I figure if I want a crop sensor backup to may R6 MkII the M6 MkII will work fine.
Two weeks ago I bought the R6 MKII and sold my R6 & EOS R to MPB. I agree with all the points you have made in this video but would add the following Plus side - Longer battery life is a hidden benefit and a welcome one. Being able to change the eye for me in studio use has been a bonus. Better Bluetooth and better wi-fi. On the fence - Still not sure I like the change to the on/off position and using the R5 & R6 MKII on the same stills shoot I keep turning the camera to video on the R6 MKII. Yes over time this will change but right now it’s annoying. Minus side - I don’t like the change when shooting with strobes in the studio. I used to turn off the expo.Simulation so the screen didn’t go black (it had enable, during stopping down, disable). Now it’s called Display Simulation with the following options, Exposure + DOF, Exposure, Exposure only during DOF. When using it in Exposure the screen goes black until you wake up the camera pushing the focus mode (dual back button in my case). It’s bloody annoying to say the least.
Thank you for watching Jeff and the great reply. Agree with you on all points. Particularly the issue with exposure simulation when using strobes. To be honest I thought I just had a setting wrong so glad to hear someone else finds this change annoying.
I’m enjoying the camera for wildlife but biggest gripe is the Video Record button whilst in Stills mode. Unlike the R5 , once you press record it uses an automatic mode hence minimal control unless I’m not aware of a fix!
Great video! I have been using the EOS R since release (2018), and it replaced my 1DX, lol. But, the lag time from taking a photo vs. seeing it in the EVF has been getting annoying for me (ever since I saw how fast it was on the R5). So, I am wondering if the R6 II is like that, or is it just as fast as the R5? Honestly, I prefer the smaller MP of the R6 line, I also prefer x2 SD card slots, so for me I think this is the best option to upgrade. Just want a faster "experience" from AF to shutter press, to seeing the results in the EVF.
I finally sold my RP for the R6mkii. Well worth the upgrade after doing the comparison with the original R6 to justify spending more…. And then Canon released the R8 so soon after and now I feel like the R6mkii is a bit overpriced.
@@bigbluerios, If he noticed the differences between the R8 and the R62 he won't regret it because even in terms of image quality the R62 is better than the R8 although many claim that they are the same!
You don't think the R6 Mark 2 is a worthy upgrade from the original R? Wow. You might have just saved me a ton of money. Lots of other reviews say it's a major improvement for photo and video.
I am very interested in upgrading from my R6 (because I feel like the R6 m2 is the standard for canon and the R6 is like a test version they put out to figure things out in the mirrorless market). However the upgrade would cost me 1.400€ and tbh, i am not sure if that is justified, bc as you said the original R6 is pretty dope already. Greetings Max
Lovely tuff! How do you find the colours comparedto the R5? Always striggled with the colours on my R5 and considering a downgrade as I rarely need the 45mp!
Currently shooting with the R6 and love it. I would not upgrade to the II because the differences are just not enough. If I decided to upgrade I would just go to the R5 which I will most likely do if they decide to come out with an R5 II. I would rather upgrade to 45 + MP than just 24. Great review though and thanks! 🤙🏾
Thank you for the video! I watched your lens comparison, but it's hard to decide. Can you please advise on which lens you think would be more versatile for shooting video and photos? 24-70 f2.8 or 28-70 f2? (camera r6mk2)
Thank you SID! That’s a tough one. What kind of things do you shoot? I’d you’re doing more video than photo I would suggest the 24-70 thanks to the lens IS. If the opposite is true then the 28-70 is great for photography but I didn’t love it for video on a small body as it ends up being very front heavy
@@JamesReader Thank you for the response! I'm planning to get a versatile set, so I'm considering the 28-70 specifically. I'll be shooting video with a stabilizer, and I like that this little guy is fast and sharp.
I thought I give the Canon R5C a go when I purchased it used about 3 months ago. Thank god I only took a $200 loss. That camera was just awful for hybrid shooters. I freelance for a company called SpotHoper and I have to take photo and video at restaurants and bars in 2-3 hours. Full menus etc. The R6II is an absolute beast. I love the video photo switch easy menu and especially the Canon color science. I'm positive I have my next 4-5 year camera. I highly recommend it.
Sorry to hear about your issues with the R5C, I often considered swapping out my C70 for it but glad I didn't!. Really glad you're liking the R6 MKII, I'm really liking it too!
Great review..... I ordered one just waiting on it. For your video...As I video editor. The camera shutter sound effect with the transitions is extremely annoying.
Been loking into all cameras around the 1500 price range but seems like the R6 Mark II is the way to go. Looking into it for pictures, video is nice but not primary for me.
Thanks for video James.I only shoot stills.Sould one get the R6 Mark 2 or the R5 - R62. I hear is has better autofocus than the R5?as its 2 yrs old compared to R5 which is older.I mostly do weddings, events and editorial?Not worried about huge prints...so your thoughts?thanks mate.
Hey man! For photo I would definitely go for whichever one you can get the best deal on. The R6 or R6 II would be the route I would go for weddings. R5 is definitely overkill.
Amazing video. Right to the points. Thanks. I have a question. I am moving to mirrorless. I am 90% focused on photography. Do you think that it would be mistake if I still decide to buy the Canon R instead of the R6 II? The Canon R is so cheap today, and I am really not looking to work with video. Thanks for any help.
Thank you for watching! Absolutely not, I think the EOS R is an amazing photo camera, great build, ergonomics, resolution and colours. If you're not shooting much video the EOS R is a great way to go. May be worth considering the upcoming R8 if there's any possibility you'll want to focus more on video in the future.
@@JamesReader thank you so much for your answer. The R8 is also full frame. I like the idea of getting the R8 instead of the R. The only thing that would still make me go with the R is the resolution of 30mp. I have had a few situations where the clients asked for a cropped version of the image, not planned, and I wished I had more pixels to work with. Although 24mp (R8) to 30mp (R) wouldn't make a huge difference. Just one more question, so if I get the R8 instead of the R6 II, would I be missing a lot in terms of just photography? Thank you one more time.
@@wastedtalentusa I'm currently debating between R6 ii and the R5 for an upgrade from my EOS R. The R takes great photos, but does so slowly and has no IBIS. I think having the focus tracking and speed of the newer cameras will be a huge plus for photography. I'd probably go R over R8 if I was wanting to spend less than the R6ii/R5. If you don't frequently shoot moving subjects, or mostly only shoot moving people then EOS R could be a great choice.
@@JH-mo1nt thanks for your message, JH. I think I will get the R6 Mark II. I am not a video maker, I think I will get it anyway just in case I decide to do some videos in the future. I was still using the 5D Mark II. So, even though the R6 is faster than the R, coming from the 5D Mark II, the R would be an amazing upgrade for me. I can't count the numbers of shot I lost of moving subjects beacuse of focus problem. :) The R6 has the best auto focus ever, but the R would still be amazing for me. Sorry for my English, it is not my first language.
Canon RF lenses are for professionals and for money makers on photography. For enthusiats like me, I would like to capture memories and nature shots and can't invest that much amount on canon. So went for sony A7iv and Sigma lens.
Thanks for your opinions James! Very clear and useful as always. Did you try the R6 Mk II tethered with Adobe Lightroom? My R62 does not work with it while my R6 and 5D Mk IV have no issues. However it's a great piece of equipment both in stills and video.
@@JamesReader It will be great to get your feedback next week on this subject, James. I'm pretty desperate because I shoot a lot connected for product and portraits with lightroom. Thank you so much!
@@JamesReader Hi again James! Could you test the R6 Mk II tethered with Lightroom? I could not, and for the moment I'm trying Capture One 23 just to visualise the shooting on the computer. Although It's a solid software, I still do prefer Lightroom.
@@diegoeidelman Hey Diego! Sorry for the late reply - I have now tested tethering in LR with the R6 MKII and it works okay for me. I do have to use this method however (auto import) - ruclips.net/video/m5bAAdj6k7g/видео.html. hope that helps.
@@JamesReader Thank you James! I know that indirect method. For now is the only way to shoot tethered to Lightroom with the R62. I hope Adobe will soon make an update of their software to make our lives easier. Cheers from Buenos Aires!
The screen blackout on the R6 can be disabled. I imagine it can be done on the Mark 2 aswell. What I would like to know is if I can record internally while outputting clean HDMI. That is an issue for me with the original R6 because I have done some jobs where I stream to a big screen for a live audience. I would like to still have internal recording. Have you tested that?
They forgot to put a little fan in it.. No one is game enough to say it! -- What's the point of an "Upgrade" if they can't address the one problem that ruins your important video shoots? Non of the Panasonic cameras ever overheat.. they put a $2 dollar fan in it see S5ii which is also cheaper and has 30 more features (incl. sensor shift 96-mpixel photos). this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. Otherwise, your short-grab videos are perfect.
Thanks for watching Rob! I've had the S5II for a few weeks now, the fan design on it is brilliant (presuming it's not going to compromise weather sealing). I agree with you, for video first shooters I would go S5 II if I was looking for a camera system to invest in. I prefer Canon for photos though.
Great outline of the Pro and Cons of the R6 Mark Ii. I have been shooting weddings with the R6 for 2 years. I use my R for high resolution pictures. I currently use an R7 for video. I have an R8 on order. I have Been thinking hard about the upgrade to the R6 Mark ll. I use the rf 50 1.2 a lot for my client work. I always wonder if I am enjoying the full resolution of that lens with 20.1 mp. I am still on the fence. BTW love your work live your channel
Great review! I sold my R6 because of the lack of 3rd party lenses. Until that changes i wont be selling my kidney for RF Glass! Especially with the current line up and zoom options, when Tamron, Sigma and Sony are creating amazing zoom options, especially for us event photographers, im basically using two Sony bodies with the Tamron zooms 20-40mm f2.8 & 35-150mm f2-2.8 this also cost me half the price as Canon
Great review! How do you find the colours and sharpness compared to the R5? I've owned my R5 for a long while now and never been over the moon with the colours as well as feeling the resolution is just overkill. I miss my old sensor of the 5d mkiii way back, the colour and feeling of it was just magic. Do you find the 24mp to feel more natural and organic? Wondering if I'll be happier with low res as I never crop much and only ever print fairly small.
I have gone from R5 to R6Mk2 after hiring one. AF is better and shots are sharper, battery life significantly better. If I need resolution and cropping I use my Mk5Dsr which is better than the R5. R5 is better for video. Some say that the R6Mk2 is a mini R3.
Great video reviewing the R6II. I do wonder how wide you would recommend going as a max with Ibis turned on and shooting video. We currently shoot on the R which has no ibis and always shoot using Gimbal. Even though that should be enough we always like to use lens IS in combo with the Gimbal. As I understand the Lens IS is only available if IBIS is turned on as wel. So how bad would the wobble be doing to 16-20mm’s on gimbal with IBIS. Or would you recommend turning if of when going wide on gimbal.
I would definitely turn it off any wider than 20mm if you are using a gimbal. I do see some warping even as high as 30mm but it’s certainly at its worst below 20.
I have an R6 a short time and doing tests, photo and video, when it reaches 1" or less appears the message Busy, the memories are of good capacity, the ISO settings off, I did the test in 7D II and does not appear the message, it may be some wrong configuration.
Hi! I am keen on buying either R6II OR R5. Since I am getting a pretty good discount on both, I would still like to know which one would be a better choice. I mostly do still photography. Product photography. My options are : Canon EOS R6 Mark II Digital Camera + RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Camera Body Only. R5 is £300 expensive. Also have an option of R6II, + RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Lens which again is £300 expensive than R5. Do you think I should go with R5 Body. I have couple of EF lenses. Or R6 II with lenses is a better deal? Thanks
The R5 has the better photo image quality (although there’s not a lot in it really) but particularly for product photography I think the higher mega pixel count will be useful. Can you possibly wait? There are rumours the R5 II will be released in a few months, at that stage I think you will see the price of the original R5 drop.
Hi James! Thanks for video! I used to shoot with a Canon Mark iii DSLR, I haven’t shot for a while and now I’m choosing a new camera for myself more for interior and portrait and the choice is between EOS R just or already looking at R6 ii? I want to ask Will the photo be so much better on R6 Mark II or r5 than on R? video is not important to me now. Maybe in the future)) Thanks for answering 😊
Hey there! Thank you for watching! If video is not important to you, I can absolutely recommend the EOS R. I tested it against the R6 and R5 (in one of my previous videos) and it held up amazingly well. Great colours and image quality. It also has the same sensor as the 5D MKIV which is used by so many fashion pros to this day. I think you'll be very happy with it. The only thing to consider is if the single card slot is an issue for you. Hope that helps.
@@JamesReader Thanks a lot, friend! I wanted to clarify more, maybe I incorrectly raised the question, I just doubt that if, after all, the image quality of the R6 Mark II is better than just R at least a little bit, then it’s probably still r6 ii because this is a new camera and it’s enough seems more to long time ? And I also want to ask which lens, in your opinion, is best suited for the interior 15:35 Canon rf or 14:35 Canon rf F4 or Sigma 14:24 2,8? Thank you!
@@it0.13 No problem! I think I understand - yes the R6 MKII does have some improvements over the EOS R which will mean it will probably be longer until you need to upgrade in the future, so if you have the budget the R6 MKII is more future proof. For interiors, I would go for one of the 2.8 options, I think the 15-35 is wide enough for most interiors so that would be my recommendation thanks to the great lens IS.
For pure image quality I would recommend the R5. However if you shoot long form video the R6 II is a little better at that thanks to having no record limit.
Hi James. How easy is to fix the yellowish color on the R6 ? I’m on a budget and my I Pro Pad is just baseline and don’t have the money for a huge computer outlay. I guess I’m asking if the R6 II takes better images straight out of camera ? Thanks so much…
Hey Robert! It’s real easy to fix, the original R6 colours are great out of camera. You only really notice that it leans quite warm when comparing to say the R5 or eos R.
for someone more focused on photos i know you mentioned the 24 mega pixels its enought but when compared to something like the R5 that has 45 MP. how much better is to have moe pixels?
I try to use first curtain shutter if I'm shooting at 1/200 - 1/500 for example, just because I've had a fair amount of shutter shock issues when shooting mechanical particularly on the R5 so it's just a habit I've developed. If you shoot over 1/1000 with EFCS you will see some "busier" bokeh, so I always flip over to mechanical on brighter days when I'm shooting at very fast shutter speeds.
@@JamesReader That's the confirmation I was looking for, thank you! Same in my experience with the RF 50 1.2. Great content, always looking forward to our comparisons!
Hi James, I purchased the R10 four months ago as I was just starting in photography and only thought of taking stills within wildlife. I would now like to start getting into video so I'm thinking of upgrading to the R6 MKII. Firstly would you recommend this from the R10 and secondly can you point me into a direction of what all the video settings mean. Also I have the RF 100 to 500. I'm completely new to video and when I hear of settings such as FHD 29.97P IPB and CLOG 3, seriously I haven't got a clue what this means and why you would choose one setting over another, so probably the idiots guide would best suit me. Many thanks in advance and kind regards
Hey Terry! I think the R10 is an excellent choice for wildlife and has good video too, the only downsides against the R6 MKII is that is can't shoot in a log profile, which essentially gets the best dynamic range when shooting video. You also have a bit of an extra crop when shooting slow motion, whereas the R6 MK II has no crop in all modes. I'm planning on putting together a video with recommended settings for the R6 MKII but I would also recommend Josh Sattin's videos which should help you out - ruclips.net/video/2xqub_NF14Q/видео.html
@@JamesReader many thanks for your much appreciated and kind response, ill have a watch of Josh’s videos and hopefully start educating myself. As always James… many thanks
Hi James, greetings from Jakarta. I am RP shooter and thinking to upgrade to R6 as R6 ii is way beyond my budget. However, the R8 just launched recently and I am in doubt wheter getting R8 or R6. I am hobbyist and already have few L series EF lens: - EF 100mm L F2.8 Macro - EF 1740mm L F4 - EF 2470mm L F4 - RF 50mm F1.8 I shoot mainly portrait, street and Macro. And wanna up my skill for more: landscape and videography. Pls advise: R6 or R8? Thanks.😊
Hi there! Will you be keeping your RP? If so then the R8 makes sense as I believe they share the same battery (might need to double check that). The image quality in photo will be very similar between the R6 and R8. If you are okay with one card slot and no IBIS then I think the R8 is the best option thanks to no overheating and slightly higher resolution. Honestly though your best bet is to rent both or go to a camera shop and try both. Hope that helps - there really is no wrong choice, both are great cameras.
@@JamesReader Thanks for the insights! No, I will not keep the RP, instead I wanna trade in the RP to a new camera, in this case to R8 or R6. I am more inclined to R6, tough, as it has IBIS, dual card slot, better build and ergonomics and newer Digic X processor. If I opt R8, do not feel like I am upgrading, as the touch and feels are the same, if you know what I mean. However, the R6's overheating issue and limited time for video to 30mins, is somewhat bothers me for a camera with such high price. This is where R8 is really compelling, as it has R6 Mark II inside. Haha, what a choice to made... You surely right, there's no wrong choice as these two are great cameras. Have a good day, James, and keep producing nice quality vids like you always do.
I think I’d you just prioritise photography then go for the R6. If you need to shoot reliable video for longer periods of time too then consider the R6 II.
@@Josealmonteq50 the R7 is great and there should be more lens options for it on the way that will make it a lot more capable for many of the things you shoot. Personally I did prefer the R6 II over the R7, mainly down to the selection of full frame lenses that I feel perform a little better on the R6 II
Potential Dealbreaker Warning !!!! R6 MKII - Card Recording not supported with clean HDMI out :( Canon has done it again. removed a basic feature that existed for 15 years since in the 5D MKIII that (with MagicLantern) that seems to be still the only Canon camera that can Livestream and Record internally (as backup) a long video session like the full day conference that im streaming at the moment without stopping every 29:59. i havnt checked the R7 R10 R50 R3 R8 yet, but i have the feeling that this is the case on most if not all new - continuously recording canon hybrid cameras. i am completely bewildered by this move and very dissapointed to say the least. I am giving up on the hope for a proper all rounder from canon at this point. just don't trust them anymore. im also quite surprised that nowhere is this mentioned in all the many reviews praising this camera. maybe no one streams multicam with Canon cameras, but if you are - be aware. 📸💥🔨
How Loud is the shutter compared to the r6? The r8 sounds quite loud so wondering isf the r62 is similar. Can anyone compare? I have the r6 and the R. I want to replace the R because I hate the shutter on that. Loud and "clicky." Love the quieter shutter on the 6. I don't even need to use silent mode.
@@JamesReader wow - ok thanks! I didn't realize the r62 was quieter. I find that electronic shutter/silent is an issue with banding (I shoot mainly indoors under available light) but with the r6 I am happy with how quiet the shutter is that I don't use the electronic/silent. Need another camera (I only shoot stills and extreme high iso/low light) so wondering if I should pony up for an r62 or just grab another r6... ugh. It is for work but will there be any benefit?
@@Scott-yn3qq the prices on the R6 are so good now I would probably go that way. I found barely any difference in extreme low light between the two. I would only suggest the R6 II if you are a video or hybrid shooter. For photo the differences are minimal.
I just upgraded from the M50. I mostly shoot wildlife, and desperately needed an upgrade. I’m absolutely blown away by the R6Mii.
Upgraded to this camera from my 5dm4 and man it’s amazing. The colors out the camera are so balanced, the autofocus is amazing, and it’s bringing new life out of my EF lenses. Highly recommend.
wonder what do you have to use , what adapter to use old lenses
Hi! Thanks for your comment. I'm considering going to the R6-II but I'm happy with my 5D4, although I didn't find any comparison between those cameras.
For the other commenter, you need the Canon EF to RF Adapter to use your EF lenses (there are 3 models of adapter, depending your needs or like)
Great review, James! Being more focused on video, I decided to upgrade from Mk I to Mk II for obvious reasons... but then Lumix came with the S5 mark II and I was thinking of switching. Now listening to you, the one who used all three cameras, and other reviewers as well, I'm glad that I didn't rush the switch. I'm overall happy with it but there are still annoyances that you mentioned when connecting it to an external monitor and the micro HDMI connector.
Thank you for watching Alex! The external monitor is absolutely my biggest gripe. Seems like such an unnecessary flaw. The S5II is great but the Canon is just a lot more refined and nicer to use in my opinion. For my workflow I’ll take the uncropped 50p also.
I just got my R6 Mark II and your videos have made it very easy for me to understand the mechanics. Thanks for the insights. A total newbie with whatsoever no experience with these camera :)
Upgraded to R6II from a 250D. I fell in love with photography again. The focus, the setting, the feel, how i can trust and rely on her and focus on my shooting. Great pick.
I have 250d right now, can you tell how much difference did it make? I bought sigma 24-105mm f4 few days ago but I see from there lack of quality from 250d, a lot of pictures were out of focus.
Good review, I just made the step to full frame. I had a 90D and moved to the R6 MkII. So far the 24 MegaPixel is more than enough. The dynamic range is great and the ergonomics is like the 90D which is a great plus. I am still going through a steep learning curve.
In the cropping part, did you notice a lot of difference between 33mp and 24mp?
Great video! In my use case, I felt kinda bad that I missed the Mark 2 release by a few months when I switched from M4/3 last year. I currently have the R6 with the Ninja V ecosystem to supplement its video capabilities(no overheating for me @4K 24fps so far). I'm still on the fence about upgrading tbh because of two things: (1)IPB codec and the (2)micro-HDMI, as these somehow affects the overall video workflow. In fairness, I do love the idea of no time limit on videos and the assurance of no overheating at 24fps.
I upgrade from Canon 1Dx’s to the R6II for shooting sports. There is a huge jump in AF accuracy and shooting 40 fps is amazing. All my old lens have upgraded AF. The only thing I find as a negative is the joystick on the battery grip. I mostly shoot vertical photos. The placement of the joystick is to low on the battery grip. I uncomfortably have to stretch to reach it. I have large hands I can only imagine how the experience is for people with smaller hand. Otherwise it works perfectly. I bought it instead of the R3 because I’m holding out for a used R3 and a new R1.
I’m a sports photographer, I mainly bought it because of the 40fps and the AF. I was shooting with 1Dx’s before. It has dramatically improved the AF of my old EF lenses. I’m looking to get a used R3 at some point and the R1 if it come with high frames rates. Not interested in the video functions as a top must have.
Great video! i just made the upgrade from fujifilm after many years to the R6 mkii.
there is an dramatic increase in dynamic range and the quality of the files this beauty creates i still haven’t stopped to surprise me. would love to see a video of how you have set your camera up having shoot with canon for so long.
Figuring out how to get the most out of the camera feels like its going to be long process
Keep up the good work!
Thank you for watching! Happy to hear you're loving your R6 MKII. I'll certainly consider making a video showing my full settings but if there's anything you'd like to specifically know I'd be happy to answer!
@@JamesReader Hey again! Would love to know how you have set up the different c1/c3 custom modes and also what your dials are setup. In general what you feel works best for your workflow :)
The R6 ii looks like the best camera in its price bracket to my eyes. I did however just sell my R6 + R and just bought the R5. As I got into birding over the last years, I just felt that 20MP weren’t enough for cropping and I finally wanted to enjoy some 4K/120fps footage. I feel like I might regret not waiting for the R5 ii, but who knows when it might come out and I fear it will be quite a bit more expensive. Also my R6 and R were already loosing its value quite quickly.
R5 is still the best and 45mp is still ahead from most camera's , I sold my Canon eos R too and will upgrade to R5 for sure because R5 built quality is much better than R6 and resolution is enough for couple more years.
I know this video is a bit older but I did upgrade from the R6 to the R6MII. While I am *mostly* a hobbyist - I do second shoot for a sports (CrossFit) photographer for hire (I don't do video). I agree that the dynamic range and color of the R6MII is a noticeable improvement. While I loved my original R6 - I did find that the autofocus was disappointing with fast moving subjects despite the options of "case" scenarios to choose from. While easily worked around with the touch/drag feature - that split second could mean a missed shot; in upgrading to the R6MII - I was stunned at how appreciable the difference in autofocus, tracking, sticky-ness of the eye AF was over the original. Further - I felt like it picked up subjects at a greater distance than the original. I could have happily survived with the original R6 (although the odd colors did frustrate me) but given a particular personal challenge at the time of the R6MII release - I decided to treat myself and traded the R6 in for the upgraded MII - totally happy I did... the outlay of money was totally worth it to me.
thanks for the great and honest review. i use my r6 mostly for photos. Instead of upgrading every version like i used to do, going to use this r6 to the ground before upgrading. thanks for this! I take the occasional video,
Short and concise review, the best I watched till now. Thanks.
3:24 - Holy SMOKES! The colour grading, lighting, and softness of that shot is incredible! It looks like it came from a much more expensive cinema camera - well done! The only thing I love more than your videos is my own R6 Mark II that I bought in December right after release. It's the best camera I've ever used in 18 years as a pro (and I used some of the best).
Your videos sold me on the R6 when you posted the raw files vs the R5 and I upscaled them in Adobe Camera Raw and found little/no real world difference at 45 MP vs the R5 files... and when needed if I used the ACR "Enhance" feature the R6 files actually looked more detailed at 45 MP than the R5 files. Now with the R6 Mark II the result is even better and I (and others) do wonder if the AA filter is improved over the original R6.
PS. I wonder if there is a way to soften highlight rolloff in the highlights for Clog3 footage? I've created a pre-LUT to "expand" dynamic range and you apply it to a node prior to grading a look or adding a look LUT. It's similar to the Phantom LUT WDR pre-Lut. It really does help soften highlights though again, that clip you showed looked amazing. And the C70 vs R6 II comparison actually was really close in my opinion.
Thank you so much DRIS! You can certainly do a lot to soften the highlight roll off, I'm pretty happy with the look I get with CLOG 3 and in general find it really easy to work with in comparison to other camera's log profiles. The only real difference to the C70 is the transition to the blown out highlights being a little more pleasing and gradual on the C70 but in the real world all these differences are so minor. Truly an awesome video camera, just wish it didn't have the external monitor issue!
I love your comparison videos, they help me so much
Thank you! I’m really glad they help.
Move for me was from a 5D MkII and am very pleased. Had previously dipped my toe in the mirrorless water with a EOS-M6 so not a complete mirrorless newbie but the R6 MkII ticked all the boxes for me. Very happy so far
Is it a big difference in image quality? 5dii vs R6ii..
I have the R6. R6 mk2 looks amazing but I'll wait for R5 mk2 if that ever comes out. I would like that high res sensor. Feels kinda sad that 20mp is the highest I've had on a camera. Still good enough for amazing photos but cropping is so limited.
Hopefully they can sort out that stabilization wobble. Even just being able to turn it off easily, only using lens stabilization would be an ok workaround for me. That being said I dont shoot videos often.
Totally agree, it seems like an easy solution for Canon to let us turn off IBIS and just use the lens IS when using wider angles.
I currently have the R6 Mark 1, and I don't plan on upgrading to the Mark 2 but I am considering purchasing the R5. Great review, thanks
I’ve upgraded recently from R6 and I agree with all the things you mentioned. R6MII is so convienient to use. I very much appreciate the upgraded Q menu and better button customization. I didn’t know R5 doesn’t have this limitation with external monitor. Hope Canon will resolve this with firmware update, it’s very annoying.
Great video. Thank you
Thank you!
That false color is adjusted for clog only. They would need to implement another one for rec709. Thats why it has to be off or it would show wrong ranges. Atleast there should be a button for turning on/off view assist. That would help alot or view assist couls turn along with false color.
Mate, love your content and reviews! Thanks for that! Using the r6 mark 2 for a couple of days! Mega ..just a mega camera in my opinion! So I would like to ask you for an inside of camera settings in photo and video mode on the r6 mark 2! Looking forward to your next video! Best ✌️😎
Thank you for watching! What settings in particular would you like to know? Thank you for the kind words.
@@JamesReader Thanks for your reply! I trying to explain it as simple as possible..For me as an advanced photographer and rookie videographer..I’m always interested how is someone like you config his camera for best experience and result!
Canon actually claims that the r6 mk2 gives more detail than the orginal R despite the fewer megapixels thanks to a less aggressive AA filter.
Makes sense! Definitely a great move by Canon.
That is an interesting fact. I thought the AA filter was removed as an integral part of the Canon design but was never sure. Is there a way to remove it all together?
Love it mate, canon definitely make the best photo cameras
Cheers Gerard!
I didn't upgrade from the R6 but I did upgrade from the 5D Mark iii. What a world of difference! Diving into all your videos now. My main issue so far is its has completely stopped working on my in the middle of shooting a session...twice. Only thing that got the camera back on was taking the battery in and out. Ever have this happen? Brand new batter and most up to date firmware. So I don't know what happened exactly.
I have an R6 MkII on order upgrading from a 6D MkII, looking forward to a steep learning curve
Congrats on the new camera! I think you'll love it.
@@JamesReader arrived a few hours ago. Working through setting it up as I want it
A clear and intelligent review. Subbed!
Thank you!
I’ve upgraded from the sonyA7iii I’ve never had any interest in video, I moved as the menu system was a so much easier not only to work around but customise. So I’m happy with the version the same as you
Pound for pound this is canon’s best camera right now
Agreed 🙌
Really good video. I shot Canon since 1992, professionally from 2001. But reluctantly switched to another system in 2019 to go mirrorless because although their camera bodies are fabulous, and I am now so tempted by this R6II, the attitude towards lens diversity within the mirrorless ecosystem really sucks. That said... it's still so very tempting.
Thank you for watching Steve! Canon's attitude towards third party lens manufacturers is definitely the biggest thing to consider when looking at the RF system right now.
Just buy the EF adapter, the EF glass is good quality and from what I have seen in reviews works really well with the adapter
@@grahamtowers5513 You do make an obvious yet valid point. But coming from a 5D system with L-Lenses, I bought into mirrorless to reduce size & weight. Whilst your suggestion does allow for a wider ecosystem to be used, and may be a temporary solution (providing the EF glass can still resolve enough not to handicap the higher count modern sensors), it doesn't make much sense. One of main attractions of mirrorless is that lighter, more compact system. For those who are specifically brand loyal, it might be an option.... but do I want to be loyal to a brand which increasing doesn't provide the best options for it's customers?.... But the new bodies are still tempting 😄
@@JamesReader Canon seems to have gone back to the 'toddler' stage of needing to learn how to share 😏. When they group up a bit more, I am sure they will tempt some of their old customers back 😄
@@stevegodsell ruclips.net/video/hNdE_ANTHSo/видео.html
Great review bro!
Thank you Oli!
0:38 you mention the photo upgrades, the bump in resolution and the better autofocus.
what you forgot the mention is the better battery life, the R6 has a CIPA rating of 360 while the R6 Mk II has a CIPA rating of 580, which is quite the upgrade considering Canon didn't change the battery itself
while the CIPA rating doesn't reflect real life use, it's still a good indication of the battery life imo
Fair comment - i have noticed a pretty big improvement in battery life. Somehow slipped my mind to mention it in the video
I think image quality is better in a7iv, I suppose you meant colors. definitely lumix is go to if you focus more on video ( sweet V-log). Waiting for my R6ii
I know this review is a year old but I just recently got the R6 MkII. Found a heck of a deal on a brand new US market body for $1699. My other full frame is the Canon R and I also own the R7 which I got for shooting my grandkids at school sports and also wildlife. After a few days of testing the R6 MkII I plan to sell my old R and am thinking I will also sell the R7 since the R6 MkII is excellent for shooting moving objects which is what I got the R7 for. I liked certain things about the R7 but found it a bit of a disappointment in other ways, like shutter shock and shutter roll. I also own an M6 MKII so I figure if I want a crop sensor backup to may R6 MkII the M6 MkII will work fine.
I have the R6 v1 and LOVE it. Its the best camera I have ever owned, I also have the R5 but I like the R6 v1 images better.
An excellent & unbiest comparison of the R6 Mk II vs R6 Laszlo Montreal
Nice breakdown. I've recently place my order to upgrade from my R. It's backordered, so I have no idea when I might get it.
Two weeks ago I bought the R6 MKII and sold my R6 & EOS R to MPB. I agree with all the points you have made in this video but would add the following
Plus side - Longer battery life is a hidden benefit and a welcome one. Being able to change the eye for me in studio use has been a bonus. Better Bluetooth and better wi-fi.
On the fence - Still not sure I like the change to the on/off position and using the R5 & R6 MKII on the same stills shoot I keep turning the camera to video on the R6 MKII. Yes over time this will change but right now it’s annoying.
Minus side - I don’t like the change when shooting with strobes in the studio. I used to turn off the expo.Simulation so the screen didn’t go black (it had enable, during stopping down, disable). Now it’s called Display Simulation with the following options, Exposure + DOF, Exposure, Exposure only during DOF. When using it in Exposure the screen goes black until you wake up the camera pushing the focus mode (dual back button in my case). It’s bloody annoying to say the least.
Thank you for watching Jeff and the great reply. Agree with you on all points. Particularly the issue with exposure simulation when using strobes. To be honest I thought I just had a setting wrong so glad to hear someone else finds this change annoying.
I’m enjoying the camera for wildlife but biggest gripe is the Video Record button whilst in Stills mode. Unlike the R5 , once you press record it uses an automatic mode hence minimal control unless I’m not aware of a fix!
Great video! I have been using the EOS R since release (2018), and it replaced my 1DX, lol. But, the lag time from taking a photo vs. seeing it in the EVF has been getting annoying for me (ever since I saw how fast it was on the R5). So, I am wondering if the R6 II is like that, or is it just as fast as the R5? Honestly, I prefer the smaller MP of the R6 line, I also prefer x2 SD card slots, so for me I think this is the best option to upgrade. Just want a faster "experience" from AF to shutter press, to seeing the results in the EVF.
The R6II is just as fast as the R5 so you won’t have any shutter blackout!
It's a 400$ upgrade from the r6 to the r6ii so why would you not at that point??
I finally sold my RP for the R6mkii. Well worth the upgrade after doing the comparison with the original R6 to justify spending more…. And then Canon released the R8 so soon after and now I feel like the R6mkii is a bit overpriced.
So would if u did it again would u get the r8 vs r6ii ?
@@bigbluerios, If he noticed the differences between the R8 and the R62 he won't regret it because even in terms of image quality the R62 is better than the R8 although many claim that they are the same!
@@rui7773Images look exactly the same and dxo for some reason has not given the R6ii a score..
"To be honest": Nice of you to tell when you are honest.
You don't think the R6 Mark 2 is a worthy upgrade from the original R? Wow. You might have just saved me a ton of money. Lots of other reviews say it's a major improvement for photo and video.
For video yes it’s a good upgrade, for photo I would stick with the R!
Even with supposedly way improved AF etc?
I am very interested in upgrading from my R6 (because I feel like the R6 m2 is the standard for canon and the R6 is like a test version they put out to figure things out in the mirrorless market). However the upgrade would cost me 1.400€ and tbh, i am not sure if that is justified, bc as you said the original R6 is pretty dope already. Greetings Max
Lovely tuff! How do you find the colours comparedto the R5? Always striggled with the colours on my R5 and considering a downgrade as I rarely need the 45mp!
Currently shooting with the R6 and love it. I would not upgrade to the II because the differences are just not enough. If I decided to upgrade I would just go to the R5 which I will most likely do if they decide to come out with an R5 II. I would rather upgrade to 45 + MP than just 24. Great review though and thanks! 🤙🏾
Eu também ! =
Thank you for the video! I watched your lens comparison, but it's hard to decide. Can you please advise on which lens you think would be more versatile for shooting video and photos? 24-70 f2.8 or 28-70 f2? (camera r6mk2)
Thank you SID! That’s a tough one. What kind of things do you shoot? I’d you’re doing more video than photo I would suggest the 24-70 thanks to the lens IS. If the opposite is true then the 28-70 is great for photography but I didn’t love it for video on a small body as it ends up being very front heavy
@@JamesReader Thank you for the response! I'm planning to get a versatile set, so I'm considering the 28-70 specifically. I'll be shooting video with a stabilizer, and I like that this little guy is fast and sharp.
Good review, I am 100% photography and eyeing up a R5 as my next upgrade not the R6ii.
Dizem que a imagem do R62 é melhor msm com 24mp!
I thought I give the Canon R5C a go when I purchased it used about 3 months ago. Thank god I only took a $200 loss. That camera was just awful for hybrid shooters. I freelance for a company called SpotHoper and I have to take photo and video at restaurants and bars in 2-3 hours. Full menus etc. The R6II is an absolute beast. I love the video photo switch easy menu and especially the Canon color science. I'm positive I have my next 4-5 year camera. I highly recommend it.
Sorry to hear about your issues with the R5C, I often considered swapping out my C70 for it but glad I didn't!. Really glad you're liking the R6 MKII, I'm really liking it too!
Would you upgrade from the R6 mkii to the r5?
Great review..... I ordered one just waiting on it. For your video...As I video editor. The camera shutter sound effect with the transitions is extremely annoying.
Thanks Jon, you’ll love the camera. Thank you for the feedback also
How does this camera do when autofocusing in a wedding reception where the dj lights change all the time and capturing dancing?
And me waiting for my R8 🙄... good review!
Been loking into all cameras around the 1500 price range but seems like the R6 Mark II is the way to go. Looking into it for pictures, video is nice but not primary for me.
In that price range I would look out for an R6 or R8. Both amazing
Thanks for video James.I only shoot stills.Sould one get the R6 Mark 2 or the R5 - R62. I hear is has better autofocus than the R5?as its 2 yrs old compared to R5 which is older.I mostly do weddings, events and editorial?Not worried about huge prints...so your thoughts?thanks mate.
Hey man! For photo I would definitely go for whichever one you can get the best deal on. The R6 or R6 II would be the route I would go for weddings. R5 is definitely overkill.
I just got the ninja for R6ii and not sure how I’m going to be AFing while I use a gimbal and Ninja?
Amazing video. Right to the points. Thanks.
I have a question. I am moving to mirrorless. I am 90% focused on photography. Do you think that it would be mistake if I still decide to buy the Canon R instead of the R6 II? The Canon R is so cheap today, and I am really not looking to work with video.
Thanks for any help.
Thank you for watching! Absolutely not, I think the EOS R is an amazing photo camera, great build, ergonomics, resolution and colours. If you're not shooting much video the EOS R is a great way to go. May be worth considering the upcoming R8 if there's any possibility you'll want to focus more on video in the future.
@@JamesReader thank you so much for your answer. The R8 is also full frame. I like the idea of getting the R8 instead of the R. The only thing that would still make me go with the R is the resolution of 30mp. I have had a few situations where the clients asked for a cropped version of the image, not planned, and I wished I had more pixels to work with. Although 24mp (R8) to 30mp (R) wouldn't make a huge difference. Just one more question, so if I get the R8 instead of the R6 II, would I be missing a lot in terms of just photography? Thank you one more time.
@@wastedtalentusa I'm currently debating between R6 ii and the R5 for an upgrade from my EOS R. The R takes great photos, but does so slowly and has no IBIS. I think having the focus tracking and speed of the newer cameras will be a huge plus for photography. I'd probably go R over R8 if I was wanting to spend less than the R6ii/R5. If you don't frequently shoot moving subjects, or mostly only shoot moving people then EOS R could be a great choice.
@@JH-mo1nt thanks for your message, JH. I think I will get the R6 Mark II. I am not a video maker, I think I will get it anyway just in case I decide to do some videos in the future. I was still using the 5D Mark II. So, even though the R6 is faster than the R, coming from the 5D Mark II, the R would be an amazing upgrade for me. I can't count the numbers of shot I lost of moving subjects beacuse of focus problem. :) The R6 has the best auto focus ever, but the R would still be amazing for me. Sorry for my English, it is not my first language.
Canon RF lenses are for professionals and for money makers on photography. For enthusiats like me, I would like to capture memories and nature shots and can't invest that much amount on canon. So went for sony A7iv and Sigma lens.
Thanks for your opinions James! Very clear and useful as always.
Did you try the R6 Mk II tethered with Adobe Lightroom? My R62 does not work with it while my R6 and 5D Mk IV have no issues. However it's a great piece of equipment both in stills and video.
Haven’t tried tethering yet, I have a studio shoot on Monday so will give it a try and report back! Thank you for watching.
@@JamesReader It will be great to get your feedback next week on this subject, James.
I'm pretty desperate because I shoot a lot connected for product and portraits with lightroom.
Thank you so much!
@@JamesReader Hi again James! Could you test the R6 Mk II tethered with Lightroom? I could not, and for the moment I'm trying Capture One 23 just to visualise the shooting on the computer. Although It's a solid software, I still do prefer Lightroom.
@@diegoeidelman Hey Diego! Sorry for the late reply - I have now tested tethering in LR with the R6 MKII and it works okay for me. I do have to use this method however (auto import) - ruclips.net/video/m5bAAdj6k7g/видео.html. hope that helps.
@@JamesReader Thank you James! I know that indirect method. For now is the only way to shoot tethered to Lightroom with the R62. I hope Adobe will soon make an update of their software to make our lives easier. Cheers from Buenos Aires!
The screen blackout on the R6 can be disabled. I imagine it can be done on the Mark 2 aswell. What I would like to know is if I can record internally while outputting clean HDMI. That is an issue for me with the original R6 because I have done some jobs where I stream to a big screen for a live audience. I would like to still have internal recording. Have you tested that?
love your lighting setup what did you use for your key light on face it is so soft and which light
Thank you Ishan! It was using the Amaran 100d and the Aputure Light Dome II
They forgot to put a little fan in it.. No one is game enough to say it! -- What's the point of an "Upgrade" if they can't address the one problem that ruins your important video shoots? Non of the Panasonic cameras ever overheat.. they put a $2 dollar fan in it see S5ii which is also cheaper and has 30 more features (incl. sensor shift 96-mpixel photos). this is CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. Otherwise, your short-grab videos are perfect.
Thanks for watching Rob! I've had the S5II for a few weeks now, the fan design on it is brilliant (presuming it's not going to compromise weather sealing). I agree with you, for video first shooters I would go S5 II if I was looking for a camera system to invest in. I prefer Canon for photos though.
Great outline of the Pro and Cons of the R6 Mark Ii. I have been shooting weddings with the R6 for 2 years. I use my R for high resolution pictures. I currently use an R7 for video. I have an R8 on order. I have Been thinking hard about the upgrade to the R6 Mark ll. I use the rf 50 1.2 a lot for my client work. I always wonder if I am enjoying the full resolution of that lens with 20.1 mp. I am still on the fence. BTW love your work live your channel
Great review! I sold my R6 because of the lack of 3rd party lenses. Until that changes i wont be selling my kidney for RF Glass! Especially with the current line up and zoom options, when Tamron, Sigma and Sony are creating amazing zoom options, especially for us event photographers, im basically using two Sony bodies with the Tamron zooms 20-40mm f2.8 & 35-150mm f2-2.8 this also cost me half the price as Canon
Can we get Raw photos from this video?
If i want to switch from a7c to this camera, u recommend it? Or just upgrade to a7iv?
That's a tough one, both are great. Is there anything you are unhappy with on the Sony side that would make you want to switch?
Where Can I see this pictures?
Great review! How do you find the colours and sharpness compared to the R5? I've owned my R5 for a long while now and never been over the moon with the colours as well as feeling the resolution is just overkill. I miss my old sensor of the 5d mkiii way back, the colour and feeling of it was just magic. Do you find the 24mp to feel more natural and organic? Wondering if I'll be happier with low res as I never crop much and only ever print fairly small.
I have gone from R5 to R6Mk2 after hiring one. AF is better and shots are sharper, battery life significantly better. If I need resolution and cropping I use my Mk5Dsr which is better than the R5. R5 is better for video. Some say that the R6Mk2 is a mini R3.
@@kirkcircus, Thanks for the answer, it helped me too! Thanks👍! 🇧🇷
Great video reviewing the R6II.
I do wonder how wide you would recommend going as a max with Ibis turned on and shooting video.
We currently shoot on the R which has no ibis and always shoot using Gimbal. Even though that should be enough we always like to use lens IS in combo with the Gimbal. As I understand the Lens IS is only available if IBIS is turned on as wel. So how bad would the wobble be doing to 16-20mm’s on gimbal with IBIS. Or would you recommend turning if of when going wide on gimbal.
I would definitely turn it off any wider than 20mm if you are using a gimbal. I do see some warping even as high as 30mm but it’s certainly at its worst below 20.
@@JamesReader Thanks for the feedback 👍🏻 Looking forward to pulling the trigger on the R6II looks like an incredible hybrid photo and video camera!
I have an R6 a short time and doing tests, photo and video, when it reaches 1" or less appears the message Busy, the memories are of good capacity, the ISO settings off, I did the test in 7D II and does not appear the message, it may be some wrong configuration.
Hi!
I am keen on buying either R6II OR R5.
Since I am getting a pretty good discount on both, I would still like to know which one would be a better choice. I mostly do still photography. Product photography.
My options are : Canon EOS R6 Mark II Digital Camera + RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens
Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Camera Body Only. R5 is £300 expensive.
Also have an option of R6II, + RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Lens which again is £300 expensive than R5.
Do you think I should go with R5 Body. I have couple of EF lenses. Or R6 II with lenses is a better deal? Thanks
The R5 has the better photo image quality (although there’s not a lot in it really) but particularly for product photography I think the higher mega pixel count will be useful. Can you possibly wait? There are rumours the R5 II will be released in a few months, at that stage I think you will see the price of the original R5 drop.
Hi James! Thanks for video!
I used to shoot with a Canon Mark iii DSLR, I haven’t shot for a while and now I’m choosing a new camera for myself more for interior and portrait and the choice is between EOS R just or already looking at R6 ii?
I want to ask Will the photo be so much better on R6 Mark II or r5 than on R?
video is not important to me now. Maybe in the future))
Thanks for answering 😊
Hey there! Thank you for watching! If video is not important to you, I can absolutely recommend the EOS R. I tested it against the R6 and R5 (in one of my previous videos) and it held up amazingly well. Great colours and image quality. It also has the same sensor as the 5D MKIV which is used by so many fashion pros to this day. I think you'll be very happy with it. The only thing to consider is if the single card slot is an issue for you. Hope that helps.
@@JamesReader Thanks a lot, friend!
I wanted to clarify more, maybe I incorrectly raised the question, I just doubt that if, after all, the image quality of the R6 Mark II is better than just R at least a little bit, then it’s probably still r6 ii because this is a new camera and it’s enough seems more to long time ?
And I also want to ask which lens, in your opinion, is best suited for the interior 15:35 Canon rf or 14:35 Canon rf F4 or Sigma 14:24 2,8? Thank you!
@@it0.13 No problem! I think I understand - yes the R6 MKII does have some improvements over the EOS R which will mean it will probably be longer until you need to upgrade in the future, so if you have the budget the R6 MKII is more future proof. For interiors, I would go for one of the 2.8 options, I think the 15-35 is wide enough for most interiors so that would be my recommendation thanks to the great lens IS.
@@JamesReader Great! Thanks!
I am currently a Panasonic M4/3 shooter and thinking of switching to FF. Ignoring price, would you recommend the R5 or the R6 mk ii?
For pure image quality I would recommend the R5. However if you shoot long form video the R6 II is a little better at that thanks to having no record limit.
r6 mark 2 or c70 ? which quality is better overall? photo and video.
If you need photo then R6 II all the way. For video, as long as you don’t mind a super 35 sensor the C70 wins in every way.
Hi James. How easy is to fix the yellowish color on the R6 ? I’m on a budget and my I Pro Pad is just baseline and don’t have the money for a huge computer outlay. I guess I’m asking if the R6 II takes better images straight out of camera ? Thanks so much…
Hey Robert! It’s real easy to fix, the original R6 colours are great out of camera. You only really notice that it leans quite warm when comparing to say the R5 or eos R.
Do you have any experience using a vintage lens with the camera when using the camera for video?
Haven’t used a vintage lens yet but have used fully manual cinema glass on it.
for someone more focused on photos i know you mentioned the 24 mega pixels its enought but when compared to something like the R5 that has 45 MP. how much better is to have moe pixels?
Only if you crop a lot. Otherwise definitely save the money and go for the R6 II.
Do you find the Clog3 a bit noisy? I am wondering if just shooting HDR PQ on the R6 MK II is best?
Don't have any major issues with noise in CLOG 3 - I just try to overexpose a stop or two when possible, seems to clean up the shadows nicely.
If you put an electronic shutter + one Shot shooting, RAW will be read in 14bit or as in serial 12bit?
I’m pretty sure electronic shutter is 12bit.
So confused. as a landscape shooter (not birds) is the r6ii worth the $1500 more over the r7?
For land scape I would recommend the R6 II. The full frame sensor has access to a lot more wide angle lenses than the R7
And for photos of birds/cropping, would you buy the R62 or the R5?
The R5 will probably be a little better at heavy cropping for wildlife. The R6 II is no slouch though.
@@JamesReader , thank you 🇧🇷👍!
Hey James do you use the first curtain shutter? If so do you find issues with the bokeh?
I try to use first curtain shutter if I'm shooting at 1/200 - 1/500 for example, just because I've had a fair amount of shutter shock issues when shooting mechanical particularly on the R5 so it's just a habit I've developed. If you shoot over 1/1000 with EFCS you will see some "busier" bokeh, so I always flip over to mechanical on brighter days when I'm shooting at very fast shutter speeds.
@@JamesReader That's the confirmation I was looking for, thank you! Same in my experience with the RF 50 1.2. Great content, always looking forward to our comparisons!
Hi James, I purchased the R10 four months ago as I was just starting in photography and only thought of taking stills within wildlife. I would now like to start getting into video so I'm thinking of upgrading to the R6 MKII. Firstly would you recommend this from the R10 and secondly can you point me into a direction of what all the video settings mean. Also I have the RF 100 to 500.
I'm completely new to video and when I hear of settings such as FHD 29.97P IPB and CLOG 3, seriously I haven't got a clue what this means and why you would choose one setting over another, so probably the idiots guide would best suit me. Many thanks in advance and kind regards
Hey Terry! I think the R10 is an excellent choice for wildlife and has good video too, the only downsides against the R6 MKII is that is can't shoot in a log profile, which essentially gets the best dynamic range when shooting video. You also have a bit of an extra crop when shooting slow motion, whereas the R6 MK II has no crop in all modes. I'm planning on putting together a video with recommended settings for the R6 MKII but I would also recommend Josh Sattin's videos which should help you out - ruclips.net/video/2xqub_NF14Q/видео.html
@@JamesReader many thanks for your much appreciated and kind response, ill have a watch of Josh’s videos and hopefully start educating myself. As always James… many thanks
Hi James, greetings from Jakarta. I am RP shooter and thinking to upgrade to R6 as R6 ii is way beyond my budget. However, the R8 just launched recently and I am in doubt wheter getting R8 or R6. I am hobbyist and already have few L series EF lens:
- EF 100mm L F2.8 Macro
- EF 1740mm L F4
- EF 2470mm L F4
- RF 50mm F1.8
I shoot mainly portrait, street and Macro. And wanna up my skill for more: landscape and videography.
Pls advise: R6 or R8? Thanks.😊
Hi there! Will you be keeping your RP? If so then the R8 makes sense as I believe they share the same battery (might need to double check that). The image quality in photo will be very similar between the R6 and R8. If you are okay with one card slot and no IBIS then I think the R8 is the best option thanks to no overheating and slightly higher resolution. Honestly though your best bet is to rent both or go to a camera shop and try both. Hope that helps - there really is no wrong choice, both are great cameras.
@@JamesReader Thanks for the insights! No, I will not keep the RP, instead I wanna trade in the RP to a new camera, in this case to R8 or R6.
I am more inclined to R6, tough, as it has IBIS, dual card slot, better build and ergonomics and newer Digic X processor.
If I opt R8, do not feel like I am upgrading, as the touch and feels are the same, if you know what I mean.
However, the R6's overheating issue and limited time for video to 30mins, is somewhat bothers me for a camera with such high price. This is where R8 is really compelling, as it has R6 Mark II inside.
Haha, what a choice to made... You surely right, there's no wrong choice as these two are great cameras.
Have a good day, James, and keep producing nice quality vids like you always do.
Hi !!
I’m about to upgrade from a Canon RP . I doubt between R6 and R6ii ? Most for photography . Any coments plis?
I think I’d you just prioritise photography then go for the R6. If you need to shoot reliable video for longer periods of time too then consider the R6 II.
@@JamesReader thanks james !!
I have a R7 , is switching to r6 mark2 worth it?
What do you shoot?
@@JamesReader travel , street photography, portraits, cars pics/video
@@Josealmonteq50 the R7 is great and there should be more lens options for it on the way that will make it a lot more capable for many of the things you shoot. Personally I did prefer the R6 II over the R7, mainly down to the selection of full frame lenses that I feel perform a little better on the R6 II
C70 best canon color science within affordable price
Potential Dealbreaker Warning !!!!
R6 MKII - Card Recording not supported with clean HDMI out :(
Canon has done it again.
removed a basic feature that existed for 15 years since in the 5D MKIII that (with MagicLantern) that seems to be still the only Canon camera that can Livestream and Record internally (as backup) a long video session like the full day conference that im streaming at the moment without stopping every 29:59.
i havnt checked the R7 R10 R50 R3 R8 yet, but i have the feeling that this is the case on most if not all new - continuously recording canon hybrid cameras.
i am completely bewildered by this move and very dissapointed to say the least. I am giving up on the hope for a proper all rounder from canon at this point. just don't trust them anymore.
im also quite surprised that nowhere is this mentioned in all the many reviews praising this camera. maybe no one streams multicam with Canon cameras, but if you are - be aware.
📸💥🔨
I just bought the R6ii 😊 How can I avoid the wobble? 😢😭
I would turn ibis off if you are shooting wider than 20mm. I would rather stabilise in post
@@JamesReader where exactly can I turn it of ? I didn't find it in the menu 😮
How Loud is the shutter compared to the r6? The r8 sounds quite loud so wondering isf the r62 is similar. Can anyone compare? I have the r6 and the R. I want to replace the R because I hate the shutter on that. Loud and "clicky." Love the quieter shutter on the 6. I don't even need to use silent mode.
R6II is quieter than the R6 which is also quite a bit quieter than the R8. The R8 has quite a loud crunchy shutter compared to the others.
@@JamesReader wow - ok thanks! I didn't realize the r62 was quieter. I find that electronic shutter/silent is an issue with banding (I shoot mainly indoors under available light) but with the r6 I am happy with how quiet the shutter is that I don't use the electronic/silent. Need another camera (I only shoot stills and extreme high iso/low light) so wondering if I should pony up for an r62 or just grab another r6... ugh. It is for work but will there be any benefit?
@@Scott-yn3qq the prices on the R6 are so good now I would probably go that way. I found barely any difference in extreme low light between the two. I would only suggest the R6 II if you are a video or hybrid shooter. For photo the differences are minimal.
@@JamesReader Thanks James!
Its funny to try to justify if a 3500€(with lens) camera worth it
uSING R6 untill wheels falloff.
Typical influencer
Do you prefer it over the Sony A7RV?