Chevy Step Van: Engine Rebuilt! Now the Install & Fire-Up

In this episode we assemble and install the Chevy 292 in-line 6 in my 1982 Grumman Olson Chevy P30 Step Van. The motor has just returned from a NAPA rebuild bored to .060 over, now shes like new but with a little more power! A few bumps along the way but shes purring like a kitten. Thanks for Watching, enjoy.

[@andrewwalsh2716]

Interesting how pull old motor out inside grumman mine only front grill off and pull motor out ..

[@billarroo1]

I have a 73 O/G step Van, I just bought, I was rebuilding my 292 untill I noticed 3 virtical cracks inside the tappet housing side of the cylinder #3 of the block, now I'm trying to find a block or used engine. Hope u get yours running good.Thanks William Orange county, ca.

[@bureauoflandmanagementblm3828]

Never let a new engine idle not enough oil splash for pistons and cam lobes.

[@christopherallen3869]

Do you have any more videos of installing a motor in a step van?.
I have a 66 Chevrolet step van, previous owner had removed the motor to work on it I'm trying to figure out how to put it back in so I can use the van as a food truck.

[@flyingscrapyard]

You mice sure got yourselves a smoooooth donk there.

[@DeanMk1]

Rebuilding a 292. Very cool. Sorry you had to work with a Grumman body, though. I mean, they make flip-up front ends...what the hell Grumman?! Oh well, thanks for posting this video anyway.

[@quadview1]

How much would you estimate the engine rebuild cost ?

[@loquillocastro8854]

As I have to put the clutch I do not understand it. you can help?

[@BobVan]

I have a 350 v8 in mine that needs a rebuild. Was thinking about swapping with the 292 straight 6 for now. Does it put out enough power for yours? What’s your fuel economy?

[@DeanMk1]

292 never had the economy of the other sixes. Difference in fuel usage between 350 and 292 is negligible. 350 w/ 2-bbl made about 250 ft./lbs. of torque. Best a 292 ever did was 235. The one seen here would've originally
been rated at 215, but with the overbore, it'll probably pull a little over 220 on a good day.
So will it work? Sure it will, but you'll notice a lack of power, especially fully loaded climbing a hill.

[@BobVan]

@@DeanMk1 I did the swap, and I don’t really notice any difference in the torque or HP, but with granny low any motor will work. My sbc had a wiped out cam so I’m gonna either rebuild it or go with an LS. I like the old stuff but it just doesn’t last as long. But budget and finding the right LS will dictate which direction I go. But I really like the amount of access and simplicity I have with this 292. It’s so much easier to work on. That passenger side motor mount was the only problem I ran into when I swapped them. Had to fabricate one. If I could find a stock one like his I’d probably redo it. Thanks.

[@DeanMk1]

@@BobVan If it works for you, then great. I'm glad you found a solution to your problem.
You're comparing a 350 with a flat cam to a good 292, then yeah, I don't think I'd notice much of a power difference either.
With both engines in the same (good) condition, I think there would be at least a noticeable difference.
I've worked on a lot of trucks in my time and I've had an opportunity to A-B both setups and I've always noticed that.

[@BobVan]

@@DeanMk1 I hear ya and agree. At the low city speed/ rpm range I’m driving and with this Sm465 tranny, the extra cubic inch wouldn’t matter much. Thanks!

[@sunsundi]

How much would be the rebuild cost?

[@ChristopherTrybus]

Hi thanks for watching. The engine rebuild was done by NAPA for about $2600.

[@COZMICTOM]

MUSIC SUCKS

[@joeblow1942]

You suck.