Isokinetic stack test principles and calculations: Velocity

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 11

  • @jordanecacchioni764
    @jordanecacchioni764 16 дней назад +1

    Great video! The way I interpret the equation from the EPA is that you want to calculate the square roots of your delta P for each point, sum them up, and square the result. Then you plug that number into your equation which you will have to divide by your number of points (n). You will get a very small difference in results compared with calculating velocity per point and average them all out. I think it has to do with the quadratic dependence of velocity on differential pressures but am not 100% sure. It also helps with capturing variations in your "data set" if you have low or high pascal readings at some of the points. Would be great to get your opinion on that.

    • @AllThingsAirQuality
      @AllThingsAirQuality  16 дней назад

      Hi Jordan, I agree with your interpretation of USEPA M2 Section 12.6 except for where you mention square the sum of the roots again? Velocity is not related to the pressure drop exponentially but to its inverse.
      if I check the math it should reduces to the same as the average of all the velocities, but perhaps you can spot a mistake in my arithmetic:
      Let us assume we have 3 points to simplify (You can do the math with 6 too):
      12.6 reads:
      Vs=KpCp*SQRT(Ts/ (PsMs) ) *SUM( SQRT(detla P) ) / n
      Now let A= KpCp*SQRT(Ts/(PsMs)) to simplify writing
      For our 3 points:
      Vs=A * SUM(SQRT(delta Pi)*(1/n)
      Vs= A*( SQRT(detla P1) + SQRT(detla P2)+SQRT(detla P3) )/3
      We can separate the terms:
      Vs=A*SQRT(detla P1)/3 + A*SQRT(detla P2)/3+ A*SQRT(detla P3)/3
      Here each term is a velocity at the point, so:
      Vs= V1/3+V2/3+V3/3 = (V1+V2+V3)/3 = Average of the 3 point velocities?

    • @AllThingsAirQuality
      @AllThingsAirQuality  16 дней назад

      On a side note, this is not the best way to determine a stack gas velocity, or rather USEPA Method 1 is not. Applying the1/7th power law offers a much better representation of the average velocity.

  • @781967kh1
    @781967kh1 Месяц назад

    How we ensure the pitot tube exactly in the correct plan of flow

  • @Bfccci
    @Bfccci 11 месяцев назад +1

    How to calculate dynamic pressure?

    • @AllThingsAirQuality
      @AllThingsAirQuality  11 месяцев назад +1

      With Type 1 pitot:
      The reading is the dynamic pressure + static pressure. Thus the differential pressure reading - the static pressure will give you the dynamic pressure. The static pressure can be measured by the Type 1, through removing the + leg.
      With type S: Dynamic pressure = 0.84(or your factor)^2 x Differential pressure reading.

    • @Bfccci
      @Bfccci 11 месяцев назад +1

      cp^2 x deltaP

  • @kobusd-yx7fi
    @kobusd-yx7fi Год назад

    How do you know where to take the measurements?

    • @AllThingsAirQuality
      @AllThingsAirQuality  Год назад +1

      The exact method may vary based on legislative requirements in your region, but we measure in accordance with the USEPA's procedures. Method 1 describes where the measurements should be made and how to calculate the traverse points, see www.epa.gov/emc/method-1-samplevelocity-traverses

  • @janniegrobler5758
    @janniegrobler5758 Год назад

    Why are pitot tubes used and not anemometers?

    • @AllThingsAirQuality
      @AllThingsAirQuality  Год назад +1

      Thermocouples are simple with no moving parts. Vane anemometers can't handle the temperatures and the corrosive nature of most flue gasses