Who Called Child Services on the Gallaghers? | Shameless
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- "I'm going to the bathroom, please don't click on this file while I'm gone."
Season 3 Episode 6: Cascading Failures
Subscribe now:
/ @shameless
Watch More:
www.warnerbros...
Nobody screws with the Gallaghers.
#Shameless #Gallagher #Chicago #Comedy #Drama #LipGallagher #IanGallagher #FrankGallagher #FionaGallagher #DebbieGallagher #CarlGallagher #LiamGallagher #JeremyAllenWhite #CameronMonaghan #EmmyRossum #EthanCutkosky #WilliamHMacy
It doesn’t matter, if someone has 2 siblings or 10, siblings should NEVER be separated. The system is so awfully broken
I absolutely agree with you. What if one sibling was a protector to other sibling(s) in a home where abuse was going on? It's so cruel to do so to kids especially when they're little. It breaks my heart.
It's really unfortunate.. sometimes there isn't enough room for all of them 😢 but I always hope they can be together
no fr, my little brother went into the system and to this day we have no contact with him and don’t know where he went
@@cameronsanders4426 I'm so sorry about your brother.
Unfortunately, most people don't want to take in 10 kids at 1 time.
Shameless has no chyll button on posting lately
This is probably the worst thing that Frank has done on Shameless
nope. he killed dottie
@@chaosspy6723 oh I forgot about that what episode did he do that
@@zayvalentine6601 I don't remember because it's been two years since I saw it
@@chaosspy6723 It s one of the worst things he s done. The difference was that (as sad as it might sound) dottie actually asked him to do that. Unlike his children. They didnt ask for that.
@evanthebourne dottie didn't ask him to cancel her heart transplant surgery. he did that so she'd be desperate enough to sleep with him.
That gradual rage on Fiona’s face… gives me goosebumps every single time. I’m surprised she didn’t go berserk on Frank
I'm also surprised
She was too busy worried about the kids. Her heart was in the right place.
The rage can wait till later
i dont remember what happened but i would've ratted him out.. idc.. how do u call ACS on ur own kids that u don't bother raising and get checks from
I feel that at the end of the last seasons, the same show tried to "humanize" Frank by making him funnier and less cruel, like in the first 4 seasons.
In the first seasons he was the perfect example of an abusive father and an addict and alcoholic.
Ong, in the first episode he headbutted ian like damnnn
Ikr roght, i hate that the writer make Frank like a great father figure at the end of few season😤
Abusive yes. But even addicts and alcoholics don’t subject their children to the hell he did. Like many people have functional alcoholics or functional addicts as parents and it’s also still awful. But man this man went above and beyond to torment his kids when he could’ve and should’ve just honestly walked away entirely.
Fiona's facial reactions while listening to the tape is fantastic. Top acting from Emmy Rossum.
Frank was an asshole for this
Frank was an asshole from season 1
@@j.ronnygibson LOL true was THIS was an all time low even for him
@@farzaslasher422 convincing Carl he had cancer and basically killing a woman who needed a new heart still pisses me off
@@j.ronnygibson facts
What an idiot.
The way lip was rubbing Debbie’s head when they said she had to be placed alone🥺🥺
3:44 I love how the CPS agent let her not listen
That social worker was actually very cool
@PaulDoe79 lol, right? There are many cool ones, as there are shitty ones out there.
What concerns me is that when complaints to social services in the USA are investigated it's determined that 97% of the cases were not only unfounded but were made because the child involved was disabled or not white. As the mother of two "disabled" children of Indian descent I just want to point this fact out. The disturbing part about this fact is that it's being used as a justification for cutting social services funding across the nation, which makes me wonder what all of these racist persecutory people are going to do once we don't have a social safety valve for them to vent their inhumane tendencies.
By the way, my attitude toward social workers is that I will never relinquish custody or control over any of my children to anyone who will not commit in writing to taking care of them at least as well as I do. Given my children's medical conditions, that's usually all the motivation the social worker needs to present the findings of their investigation honestly.
This is why I'm going into the field. Because there are a lot of families that do need to have their children protected from their parents, but the white families end up killing their children first because cps is too busy rounding up all these anonymous calls in bad neighborhoods, and just believing whatever they hear from the lightest skin person. So many hurt and killed children when I was growing up.
It's so necessary, but as it functions now, we might as well barely have one at all. There is still good that comes from it, but I think it's an outlier of the people that want to help instead of getting a government paystub.
I'm sorry you have to live in fear, and I'm sure your babies are loved and cared for by someone with this much protection. The stigma of darker skinned people being more abusive needs to end. It'll be worth infiltrating these jerks to help a few kids and parents. The bad eggs are really taking over here, too.
Asian kids also almost never get reported, even if there's clear signs of abusive. Cause they're the "model minority". Stereotypically they are strict, but good parents. Other minorities are stereotypically terrible parents, thus, if there are two kids with the same signs of abuse, white kids are reported rarely, Asians almost never and other minorities a lot.
The child Service lady was so real for that
What I don't get is why the kids still have any loyalty to Frank. He certainly has no loyalty to them. Why don't they just toss him under the bus? Turn him in for all the BS and crimes he's committed.
I HAVE NO IDEA. My best guess is that it’s for the plot, because no real kids would ever want a drunk, issue-causing mess like Frank in their lives. Why do they keep covering for him?! I only watched a couple of episodes, but straight away from season one I couldn’t understand why Fiona was mad when Steve tossed him off in Canada.
I have two theories
1. Out universe reason- its oart of the show hate Frank, but he needs to be around for the plot
2. In universe reason- as long as Frank was around in the first couple seasons, the law recognized that one parent is still home. If It was only Fiona there and since she isn't their mom, the law sees it as unstable and will put them in different homes, which none of them wanted. So as much as they hated Frank, him being there was their best option.
Also, the Gallaghers are too used to a wild, semi-structured home. Doubt any of them can just go and live with a normal family. It's too strict for them.
The writers and their long list of plot holes. They should’ve cut all ties with him after Fiona got guardianship
@@j.ronnygibsonhot take: frank had no reason to be on this show past season four
@@shikara24 the only reason is that Before season 8, even Debbie and Carl still acknowledges him as a human being. After they threw Frank off the Bridge, they couldn't care less about him
I loved this show so much but Fiona not being in the end will always bother me. I needed a better ending.
@aubrey1633 she should've come back for the finale like Eric Foreman or Ritchie Cunningham, lol, but reading interviews about her leaving seems like she's just had enough
I remember when I first watched this scene. I couldnt identify who was the caller even though I knew it was a familiar voice. Later I realized I didnt want to believe it was frank mainly because I knew he was a deplorable character at that point but calling child services only so his family would let him in again. That was crossing the line even for him. I remember that I also wanted to believe it was one of fionas exs. Initially
Bro, they literally showed him calling the Social Services
@@luigicavallo270 I watched this clip first. Not the entire episode LOL
@@luigicavallo270It was a low point, even for him.
I always wondered why weren’t they all kept together since don’t they try to keep siblings together
Probably lack of room
bc there's like 5 of them. foster care is a mess. Who is willing to take 5 kids of all ages at the same time? lol
If there is space. Speaking from experience. See, foster homes are specific to ages. So you have homes that specialize in special needs, infants and toddles, children up to 12, then teenagers. If they don't have homes that are designated for all those then kids fet separated.
This was the upmost PATHETIC thing Frank has ever done.
The thing I never understood was why the hell did the barmaid who overheard the call to SS not tel Fiona about it when it was made?! Or at the very fucking least warn Kev?!
plot convenience maybe?
I’m glad there uploading long videos
Many of the calls to social services can be truthful and honest. However theres so many social situations and people who weaponize social services. Franks case. He did this in such a way to hurt the kids. Even telling on himself.
I’m so glad Frank and Monica both died in this show.
Lane is that you?
Lol I came here to say that
This is why I prefer UK Frank cos he would never of done this
I tried to put myself back into foster care three times
I am so very sorry you went through that. Sending prayers. S xo :(
Frank was such an asshole my goodness...
I haven’t watched the show I just watch the clips what did Fiona do to frank after finding out?
She decided to become the kids legal guardian and fought Frank in court for full custody
Fiona attempts to get custody of the kids so they wouldn't have to rely on Frank as much! Phenomenal acting in this string of episodes. Here's the custody hearing:
ruclips.net/video/T39rEu2Eiq8/видео.html
She had the locks changed and then let him back in the next episode 🙄 the writers hate consistency
@@shamelessgood job
Wait if she Didn't want her to touch a computer why she left it open like that
its sarcasm, she was telling her to look without getting in trouble for showing her
@@pypersora8690 For real I can't believe I played myself cause I can't tell the difference when someone's being sarcastic or serious
Frank!
The call frank made was completely selfish and trying to get what he wanted without thinking about the impact it would have on the kids
I actually never saw this show
We need a Shameless series about a young Frank and another series in his the family is doing now.
1:29 I’m sorry, but I can’t hold in my wheezing
From this point on Fiona is done with Frank as far as I remember she never calls him "dad" again after this not even in the custody hearing iirc she calls him there "father" but not dad.
This so sad frank is a shitty dad
Watching this episode/series for the 1st time......i hate frank i dont understand how people justify his actions
No estoy en el puesto de Fiona (gracias a Dios) pero creo que cualquier lugar es mejor para los niños que su casa
lol...lane kim left stars hollow and became a social worker....lolol
Finnally a shameless youtue channel
3:15 that part got me laughing so hard
I Want To Watch This Episode Of The Show 😢
They removed the part where Fiona said "men don't give a shit". And that's true.
America does a lot of adopting even when the parents are still around.
That feels really weird, even if the biological parents suck.
Not really an option in my country (germany). Our system has issues too, theres pretty much no adoption, definitely no adoptions if the parents are around. Its all long term foster. Which has its advantages and disadvantages. Kids get to keep their identity and if possible have a relationship with their biological parents. Thats great.
But the kids are also in limbo till they turn 18. Theyll never get to truly feel safe, because on paper reunification is always the goal, even after 17 years in the same foster family.
And theyre on display till they turn 18. Foster families cant do a lot of stuff without permission. And their social workers come by regularly (theyre supposed to anyway, doesnt always happen)
I think we need a mix of both systems. Allow fosterparents in long term foster placements to make more decisions for the child. Vacations, hairstyles etc. Maybe even a move.
But still allow the kids to have a relationship with their biological family. (If it doesnt hurt them)
And also make the long term foster placement as permanent as you can after a couple years, just to give the kid some stability, to legally show the kid that they wont be ripped out of their family. They rarely if ever do that in practice anyway, may as well make it an official rule.
So in total, create some hybrid thats somewhere between longterm foster and adoption. That would be the better system in my opinion.
Cause as long as its not adoption, the kid can keep contact with sinblings and parents. After that, legally they have no more relation.
jimmy steve in the background = 😠
LANE KIM FROM GILMORE GIRLS????
LITERALLY MY REACTION
I have 8 younger siblings i wouldve gone fcking berserk
What happens if Frank dies?
He did
Were can i watch it
Netflix
What season and episode
Check description