3:40 Thank you, for showing the difference between stock 'Style' settings and with them turned down. I think you're literally the first one to do that. I think it's a very important comparison and in fact, I think maybe you could do a video on how close you can get the Air 3S footage to the Mavic 3 one. Thanks, again.
Glad you liked the video! I currently run M3, A3S, and Mi4P as my core fleet of photo/video stuff. They’re all slightly different, but on small format screens the quality is nearly indistinguishable. Plus I have a drone for almost any scenario and backups on backups in case the worst happens to one of them!
Great video! I'm hoping some of these setbacks are remedied in future firmware updates. That imaging processing weirdness is the only thing holding me back from purchasing this over the air 3 or mavic 3 classic.
Awesome video! Finally someone talks about the ‘style’ section! At the moment I’ve got it set -1 on the sharpening & 0 on the noise. I would love to see a video on showing us the differences with it all the way up and all the way down! Again great video and thank you for talking sence! Subscribed 💯👊🏻
-1 sharpening and 0 on noise reduction is probably a solid combo. I found -1 sharpening still had the image a little too digitally sharp...but that's the beauty of photography and videography...everything is subjective! What looks good to one may not look good to another or vice versa. Still, I like your settings overall. Probably softens the image just enough to be noticeable without completely smudging it and introducing unnecessary noise.
@ exactly that! Had a a play about today and my settings defo do look good! But thank you buddy your video really helped me out and also the only person to get back to me asking a question I’ve asked! Means a lot to me! Keep doing what you’re doing! 💯👌🏻
I’d like to see how it does in low light or indoors where light is low. This is what I need the most and 5k would be next. I’m gonna wait and see what the Mavic 4 can do.
I am gathering data on lowlight. Spoilers...it's not fantastic. Not bad by any means...but not what you'd expect after seeing the footage and photos captured in favorable lighting scenarios.
V30 cards work fine for footage from prosumer drones. However, V60 MAY be slightly better. V90 you will spend more on the card than it’s worth as far as return on investment goes. I’d stick between V30 and V60 (I use V30).
I went out and bought another card because I thought the 256 was too large for the 3s. Thanks, I’m gonna return it now and hopefully that message can be taken away during the next update
Love this review. I think we can agree that this drone is for the consumer who doesn’t care about color grading and just wants the image straight out of a camera. Professionals may use this here and there. But Mavic, will always be king. Makes you wonder, why not purchase a mavic 3 classic which looks like a steal now days and is more future proof than the air 3s. Food for thought.
Also what does the noise setting tuned up do? Or turned down? Am I right in saying with the setting turned up it will take care of the noise for you? Or take as much as it can out anyways, so u don’t have too when editing? Thanks buddy!
Hey, great question! Turning the Noise Reduction up reduces noise in your picture, while turning it down allows for more noise if the image is not properly exposed or the lighting conditions are complex.
@ thank you my friend! Tried it today and yeah turning it up takes the noise out especially in dark areas which it brilliant for me as I don’t de-noise my work… excellent setting! 👍🏻
It's been 2 weeks since the Air 3S came out and there is still not a single comparison video with the mini 4 pro camera level on the whole of the world youtube please can you make a comparison
Informative, thank you. What about native ISO for Air 3S? I assume it would be dual native like Air 3 (it had 100 and 400 as a native ISO), would you know if that is the case for Air 3S as well or there are different values?
Air 3s it is very goog for the price, there is just one little point that I have not seen reviewers mention maybe I did not search enough but will the Air 3s work will googles 3 as Air 3 does , because currently on the DJI site it does not mention googles 3 compatibility with Air 3s I hope it will be a later update myself as their R2 screen could do with being much brighter hope they come up with a new RC Pro that is much brighter. Although myself I'm waiting for what Mavic 4 brings hopefully an new RC Pro too. Dynamic range is important and Air 3s is good upgrade as is that lidar.
I think we're all waiting to hear on the Goggles 3 compatibility. At least I have not seen anything yet that points to compatibility. That said...if the Goggles 3 are their full version (not a watered down version of another set of goggles coming down the line), I'd expect there to be compatibility between the Air 3S and the Goggles 3.
I just learned this earlier today from a long thread on an Air 3s Facebook group. My question is, why are more people noticing it now more with this drone and previous drones. For example, a few people were saying things like, I came from the Air 3, or Mini 2, etc, and didn't have this issue." Why are people coming out about this with this drone and not the previous ones?
@@renderinghues It sounds like the 24mm sensor doesn't have an anti-aliasing filter, which gives you a sharper image, but risks moire on regular grids if it hits the wrong frequency. You can see the moire change patterns as the grid size changes through camera movement. Reducing the sharpness when shooting should help reduce the moire, but good still editing software will have tools to help as well. Video moire is probably more difficult. You can see it on some of Billy Kyle's sample video looking straight down on roofs.
For this video specifically - because those are the maximum camera settings as far as performance from the drone is concerned. In general, there are two main reasons from my perspective: 1. More flexible. If I need to slow the footage down I can do that and easily incorporate it into a project that is delivered at 30fps with most people hard-pressed to tell the difference. Both the difference between 24fps and 30fps as well as the difference between my 60fps source footage and the rest of the footage at 30fps. 2. I think drone footage shot at 24fps can tend to look choppy and not as smooth. Maybe it’s just me, but anytime I shoot in 24fps with a drone I just think it looks significantly worse than if it’s shot at 30 or 60 fps. A lot of different perspectives on that. Just depends on how you edit and how you like to deliver.
Great review. I'm disappointed with Air 3S photos. I don't like the lens distortion, the horizon is tilted down to the right and there's moire over complex details such as over fields and roofs. Raw files are too soft and focus is intermittent. Wide aperture leads to soft landscapes, struggles to focus on buildings in the distance.
Yes. The Mavic 2 Pro still stands up today and is a fine drone for use in 2024 if you still have functional batteries. That said, the Air 3S is processing data at a different level than the Mavic 2 and, even at a lower megapixel count, will produce cleaner photos. The only thing that is a consistent let-down (and where the Mavic 2 Pro still reigns supreme compared to ANY Air drone) is the lack of that adjustable aperture. Even if they did an abbreviated range (f2.8 to f7.1 or something), it would be extremely helpful in the depth of field and exposure parts of photography and videography. That wide open, fixed aperture produces some stunning images, but it's not always what a photographer needs.
@@TheDroneGeek thank you man for your reply, super useful. I ordered already 3 days ago the air3s and your words keep me the hype on haha. I know, adjust the aperture will be a big missing, will try to adapt but unfortunaly mavic 2 pro was leaving me, constant problem with Rc/compass/battery and annoying app/phone connection. I think I will feel much more relaxed with air3s (hope) thanks a lot for the tips!
So here’s my issue with what you said. Yes, movie studios not all but most were shooting in 1080p. however, that is half the story because of different file types as well as variable types of video bit rate being shot depending on the project. For instance, would you hire someone who is using an inspire 2/3 or someone using a Mavic 3 cine? I won’t even say an Air3s because it’s too obvious so Ill say that your comparing apples to oranges. The Air3s is the epitome of DJI’s pursuit of perfection when it comes to software as well as AI being sold to the prosumer. The Air3s is the new jack of all trades Drone but to say it’s as good as that 4/3 Hasselblad sensor with the flexibility of a variable aperture? is kind of a stretch imo Especially when your messing around with the shutter speed and start to get occasional instances of weird motion blur to contend with in post which is not exclusive to this drone( general DJI issue)
Did you actually shoot or just a gear freak? 4/3 sensor is not medium format sensor which you are bragging about its still a small sensor only … If you know good editing 1inch or 4/3 wont matter much
@ I do commercial work, I regularly color grade , and im familiar with the DJI platform. so outside of the inspire 3, The Mavic 3 or pro cine is the preferred Drone for commercial work amongst the majority of my clients and im sure Drone Geek will agree with me on that point. Also, the type of software can be personal preference so some people use, final cut pro, some people use adobe products, and some people(like myself) use Davinci paid or free version. It depends
With the new internal camera processing systems, it’s not accurate to compare stats with a camera that lacks these systems. The Air3s, for example, has a better processing system than the Air3. While comparing their specifications can be fun, as shown by the comparison test results, it’s not really valid. Just my opinion! 😊
That's the fun thing about comparisons, they help us to see just how far we've come or just how much better (or worse) something is than a predecessor. In the case of the Air 3 versus the Air 3S, the fun is in seeing the upgrades that were brought to the drone and its camera system over the last year or so. In another case where we compare the Air 3S against the Mavic 3, the fun is in seeing how the processing and overall upgraded hardware and intelligence of the Air 3S stacks up against the superior specs of the Mavic 3 that are traditionally sought-after by photographers and videographers for more flexible multimedia. Totally valid to look at all sorts of technology against one another -- especially when all of the drones are at least in the ballpark of one another quality-wise. Now, if I had compared the Air 3S to, let's say, the BWine F7...well, then I'd be pushing it. ;)
I’m using drones just for photos and I’ve understood from some review of this drone that it has a 1” sensor with just 12mpxl??!! Really? The 50 mpxl is the same lie of the 48mpxl on the mini 3 and 4… come on… they are just doing marketing instead of be clear about the camera specs…
Very helpful video, thank you. Regarding the auto panorama stitching that you mentioned, my Mini 4 Pro generally does a pretty good job with it, but more often than not will have a few stitching issues with the ‘spherical’ panos (and occasionally 180 degree). It seems like this is usually worse in windy conditions, where the drone is probably struggling to hold its position, so I was hoping the Air 3S would do better in this regard. In your experience, is the issue more to do with the automatic stitching done by DJI’s software, meaning that it can still be stitched properly in something like Lightroom? Or are the image perspectives too different to recover it in any program?
Based on my experience, I think DJI's automatic stitching lacks the ability to accurately predict pixel patterns to properly account for mispositions when in certain ambient conditions. This is an area where DJI could absolutely use some improvements. I think it's a low priority issue for them overall since MOST of the time it works flawlessly...but even if it misstitches something 10% of the time it can be extremely frustrating for end users that like to shoot panoramas.
@ Thanks for the reply. Certainly doesn’t sound ideal, and I think you’re probably right. At least if that was the case then, in theory, it could be fixed with a firmware update, but yeah…won’t hold my breath!
ALERT = you said maybe three times that you shoot in 12 meg because it gives you more flexibility in post... but you never once said how and why that`s a thing.. 90 per cent of us have no clue what you mean ????????
12MP mode does not process or touch the noise or sharpness of the image. It's left completely raw and at its native resolution. When you edit the 12MP photos, you are getting essentially a block of clay with which you can sculpt how you please. When you shoot in the 48/50MP mode, you are allowing the drone to process, denoise, and upscale the image to a larger resolution. When it does this, you are still able to manipulate the photo pretty much how you want, but it won't be nearly as flexible as the 12MP when it comes to denoising and sharpening especially.
@@TheDroneGeek Ok that makes perfect sense BUT !!!!!!!!! half the people online are claiming it is a native 12mp and the other half native 48 or 50mp... so either one side is right and ur right... or the other side are right and its the exact opposite of what ur saying... us mere mortals have no chance
This one is more subjective than you’d think. Yes, the upscaled resolution is great in the 48/50MP, but I like to have more control over my edits. Some people care less about that flexibility and want a “ready” image right off the camera. It just depends in what means more to you.
To me this 3s is big disappointment, autel introduced their drones with 1inch sensor and veriable aperture 2 year ago, in addition Dji did step back with 1/1.3 after Mavic air 2s...footage from Air3 looks good but is it enough high lvl deserved for 2024...im not sure
@@TheDroneGeek Wow. Instead of saying "Thank you for pointing out where im making a mistake as 8m not reviewing my videos before uploading them so i would never know something is wrong until someone would tell me. It's a valuable feedback and my audience deserves for the best" you have decided to shit on the messanger. How wise! BTW, I am not and I am not trying to he a youtuber so you pointing out that my YT channel sucks doesn't make any sense. Are you going to ridicule me because i have zero subscribers and you have 50? It was my first visit on your channel but because it turned out that you are an asshole I'm not going to make that mistake again. Good job champ
Great info, I was considering this one but I think I'm going to wait for the Mavic 4. Thanks again.
3:40 Thank you, for showing the difference between stock 'Style' settings and with them turned down. I think you're literally the first one to do that. I think it's a very important comparison and in fact, I think maybe you could do a video on how close you can get the Air 3S footage to the Mavic 3 one. Thanks, again.
Great way to explain things. My 3s will be here in a few days
Got the mini 4 gonna use it as a back up.
Glad you liked the video! I currently run M3, A3S, and Mi4P as my core fleet of photo/video stuff. They’re all slightly different, but on small format screens the quality is nearly indistinguishable. Plus I have a drone for almost any scenario and backups on backups in case the worst happens to one of them!
Great video! I'm hoping some of these setbacks are remedied in future firmware updates. That imaging processing weirdness is the only thing holding me back from purchasing this over the air 3 or mavic 3 classic.
subscribed. I like very much the way you explain things.
Thank you! That means a tremendous amount to me.
Awesome video! Finally someone talks about the ‘style’ section! At the moment I’ve got it set -1 on the sharpening & 0 on the noise. I would love to see a video on showing us the differences with it all the way up and all the way down! Again great video and thank you for talking sence! Subscribed 💯👊🏻
-1 sharpening and 0 on noise reduction is probably a solid combo. I found -1 sharpening still had the image a little too digitally sharp...but that's the beauty of photography and videography...everything is subjective! What looks good to one may not look good to another or vice versa.
Still, I like your settings overall. Probably softens the image just enough to be noticeable without completely smudging it and introducing unnecessary noise.
@ exactly that! Had a a play about today and my settings defo do look good! But thank you buddy your video really helped me out and also the only person to get back to me asking a question I’ve asked! Means a lot to me! Keep doing what you’re doing! 💯👌🏻
dji mavic air 3s game changer its great
I’d like to see how it does in low light or indoors where light is low. This is what I need the most and 5k would be next. I’m gonna wait and see what the Mavic 4 can do.
I am gathering data on lowlight. Spoilers...it's not fantastic. Not bad by any means...but not what you'd expect after seeing the footage and photos captured in favorable lighting scenarios.
Could you maybe mention what kind of sd card would be better for the Air 3S?
something high speed it will tell you if the card is too slow
V30 cards work fine for footage from prosumer drones. However, V60 MAY be slightly better. V90 you will spend more on the card than it’s worth as far as return on investment goes. I’d stick between V30 and V60 (I use V30).
@@TheDroneGeek ty very much 👍🏻
I went out and bought another card because I thought the 256 was too large for the 3s. Thanks, I’m gonna return it now and hopefully that message can be taken away during the next update
Love this review. I think we can agree that this drone is for the consumer who doesn’t care about color grading and just wants the image straight out of a camera. Professionals may use this here and there. But Mavic, will always be king. Makes you wonder, why not purchase a mavic 3 classic which looks like a steal now days and is more future proof than the air 3s. Food for thought.
Also what does the noise setting tuned up do? Or turned down? Am I right in saying with the setting turned up it will take care of the noise for you? Or take as much as it can out anyways, so u don’t have too when editing? Thanks buddy!
Hey, great question! Turning the Noise Reduction up reduces noise in your picture, while turning it down allows for more noise if the image is not properly exposed or the lighting conditions are complex.
@ thank you my friend! Tried it today and yeah turning it up takes the noise out especially in dark areas which it brilliant for me as I don’t de-noise my work… excellent setting! 👍🏻
It's been 2 weeks since the Air 3S came out and there is still not a single comparison video with the mini 4 pro camera level on the whole of the world youtube please can you make a comparison
Working on this one 😉
There are! Search again 🤩
Informative, thank you. What about native ISO for Air 3S? I assume it would be dual native like Air 3 (it had 100 and 400 as a native ISO), would you know if that is the case for Air 3S as well or there are different values?
Was that ever advertised by DJI for the air 3?
Air 3s it is very goog for the price, there is just one little point that I have not seen reviewers mention maybe I did not search enough but will the Air 3s work will googles 3 as Air 3 does , because currently on the DJI site it does not mention googles 3 compatibility with Air 3s I hope it will be a later update myself as their R2 screen could do with being much brighter hope they come up with a new RC Pro that is much brighter. Although myself I'm waiting for what Mavic 4 brings hopefully an new RC Pro too. Dynamic range is important and Air 3s is good upgrade as is that lidar.
I think we're all waiting to hear on the Goggles 3 compatibility. At least I have not seen anything yet that points to compatibility. That said...if the Goggles 3 are their full version (not a watered down version of another set of goggles coming down the line), I'd expect there to be compatibility between the Air 3S and the Goggles 3.
The “odd noise” is called moire, its sharp repetitive patterns, it happens on mirrorless and dslr cameras too, it’s always a pain.
Thank you for giving me a new vocab word!
I just learned this earlier today from a long thread on an Air 3s Facebook group.
My question is, why are more people noticing it now more with this drone and previous drones.
For example, a few people were saying things like, I came from the Air 3, or Mini 2, etc, and didn't have this issue."
Why are people coming out about this with this drone and not the previous ones?
@ reduce your sharpening to -2 and you can always add a slight blur in post to help remove
@@renderinghues It sounds like the 24mm sensor doesn't have an anti-aliasing filter, which gives you a sharper image, but risks moire on regular grids if it hits the wrong frequency. You can see the moire change patterns as the grid size changes through camera movement. Reducing the sharpness when shooting should help reduce the moire, but good still editing software will have tools to help as well. Video moire is probably more difficult. You can see it on some of Billy Kyle's sample video looking straight down on roofs.
@@bruceclarkephotographyno dji drones are equipped with anti aliasing filters. In fact very few digital cameras now have anti aliasing filters.
Why are so many people shooting video on drones using 30 and 60 frame rates, rather than 24 fps?
For this video specifically - because those are the maximum camera settings as far as performance from the drone is concerned.
In general, there are two main reasons from my perspective:
1. More flexible. If I need to slow the footage down I can do that and easily incorporate it into a project that is delivered at 30fps with most people hard-pressed to tell the difference. Both the difference between 24fps and 30fps as well as the difference between my 60fps source footage and the rest of the footage at 30fps.
2. I think drone footage shot at 24fps can tend to look choppy and not as smooth. Maybe it’s just me, but anytime I shoot in 24fps with a drone I just think it looks significantly worse than if it’s shot at 30 or 60 fps.
A lot of different perspectives on that. Just depends on how you edit and how you like to deliver.
it doesn't support H.264 in 4k which is a major problem
I don't disagree with this at all. One of the more disappointing components of the drone.
Noob here 😅 why is that a problem?
@@RickBeacham most production companies want video in H.264 its an industry standard
Great review. I'm disappointed with Air 3S photos. I don't like the lens distortion, the horizon is tilted down to the right and there's moire over complex details such as over fields and roofs. Raw files are too soft and focus is intermittent. Wide aperture leads to soft landscapes, struggles to focus on buildings in the distance.
do you think it produce better photos than a mavic2pro?
Yes. The Mavic 2 Pro still stands up today and is a fine drone for use in 2024 if you still have functional batteries. That said, the Air 3S is processing data at a different level than the Mavic 2 and, even at a lower megapixel count, will produce cleaner photos. The only thing that is a consistent let-down (and where the Mavic 2 Pro still reigns supreme compared to ANY Air drone) is the lack of that adjustable aperture. Even if they did an abbreviated range (f2.8 to f7.1 or something), it would be extremely helpful in the depth of field and exposure parts of photography and videography. That wide open, fixed aperture produces some stunning images, but it's not always what a photographer needs.
@@TheDroneGeek thank you man for your reply, super useful. I ordered already 3 days ago the air3s and your words keep me the hype on haha. I know, adjust the aperture will be a big missing, will try to adapt but unfortunaly mavic 2 pro was leaving me, constant problem with Rc/compass/battery and annoying app/phone connection. I think I will feel much more relaxed with air3s (hope)
thanks a lot for the tips!
if you could get any drone, DJI Air 3s or DJI Mavic 3 Classic, which one would you get.
What are you using it for?
Does the Air 3S use the goggles 3?
Its Chris the Drone Geek
It’s THE Eddie Nunez.
👍👍
I love you.
So here’s my issue with what you said. Yes, movie studios not all but most were shooting in 1080p. however, that is half the story because of different file types as well as variable types of video bit rate being shot depending on the project. For instance, would you hire someone who is using an inspire 2/3 or someone using a Mavic 3 cine? I won’t even say an Air3s because it’s too obvious so Ill say that your comparing apples to oranges. The Air3s is the epitome of DJI’s pursuit of perfection when it comes to software as well as AI being sold to the prosumer. The Air3s is the new jack of all trades Drone but to say it’s as good as that 4/3 Hasselblad sensor with the flexibility of a variable aperture? is kind of a stretch imo
Especially when your messing around with the shutter speed and start to get occasional instances of weird motion blur to contend with in post which is not exclusive to this drone( general DJI issue)
Did you actually shoot or just a gear freak? 4/3 sensor is not medium format sensor which you are bragging about its still a small sensor only … If you know good editing 1inch or 4/3 wont matter much
@ I do commercial work, I regularly color grade , and im familiar with the DJI platform. so outside of the inspire 3, The Mavic 3 or pro cine is the preferred Drone for commercial work amongst the majority of my clients and im sure Drone Geek will agree with me on that point. Also, the type of software can be personal preference so some people use, final cut pro, some people use adobe products, and some people(like myself) use Davinci paid or free version. It depends
With the new internal camera processing systems, it’s not accurate to compare stats with a camera that lacks these systems. The Air3s, for example, has a better processing system than the Air3. While comparing their specifications can be fun, as shown by the comparison test results, it’s not really valid. Just my opinion! 😊
That's the fun thing about comparisons, they help us to see just how far we've come or just how much better (or worse) something is than a predecessor. In the case of the Air 3 versus the Air 3S, the fun is in seeing the upgrades that were brought to the drone and its camera system over the last year or so. In another case where we compare the Air 3S against the Mavic 3, the fun is in seeing how the processing and overall upgraded hardware and intelligence of the Air 3S stacks up against the superior specs of the Mavic 3 that are traditionally sought-after by photographers and videographers for more flexible multimedia.
Totally valid to look at all sorts of technology against one another -- especially when all of the drones are at least in the ballpark of one another quality-wise. Now, if I had compared the Air 3S to, let's say, the BWine F7...well, then I'd be pushing it. ;)
It does not have H.264!!! 👈🏼
Not for 4K right now, but you can shoot H.264 in other resolutions.
@TheDroneGeek yes! but we've paid 4K for a reason 🧑🏼⚖️. Compatibility for H.265 isn't that good right now 🤷🏼
I’m using drones just for photos and I’ve understood from some review of this drone that it has a 1” sensor with just 12mpxl??!! Really? The 50 mpxl is the same lie of the 48mpxl on the mini 3 and 4… come on… they are just doing marketing instead of be clear about the camera specs…
It is true Air 3S max bitrate curently is only 60MB/s ?
No. Some people are seeing the bitrate as low as 90Mbps, but I have not seen any credible reports of it going as low as 60Mbps when shooting 4K60.
Very helpful video, thank you. Regarding the auto panorama stitching that you mentioned, my Mini 4 Pro generally does a pretty good job with it, but more often than not will have a few stitching issues with the ‘spherical’ panos (and occasionally 180 degree). It seems like this is usually worse in windy conditions, where the drone is probably struggling to hold its position, so I was hoping the Air 3S would do better in this regard.
In your experience, is the issue more to do with the automatic stitching done by DJI’s software, meaning that it can still be stitched properly in something like Lightroom? Or are the image perspectives too different to recover it in any program?
Based on my experience, I think DJI's automatic stitching lacks the ability to accurately predict pixel patterns to properly account for mispositions when in certain ambient conditions. This is an area where DJI could absolutely use some improvements. I think it's a low priority issue for them overall since MOST of the time it works flawlessly...but even if it misstitches something 10% of the time it can be extremely frustrating for end users that like to shoot panoramas.
@ Thanks for the reply. Certainly doesn’t sound ideal, and I think you’re probably right. At least if that was the case then, in theory, it could be fixed with a firmware update, but yeah…won’t hold my breath!
ALERT = you said maybe three times that you shoot in 12 meg because it gives you more flexibility in post... but you never once said how and why that`s a thing.. 90 per cent of us have no clue what you mean ????????
12MP mode does not process or touch the noise or sharpness of the image. It's left completely raw and at its native resolution. When you edit the 12MP photos, you are getting essentially a block of clay with which you can sculpt how you please. When you shoot in the 48/50MP mode, you are allowing the drone to process, denoise, and upscale the image to a larger resolution. When it does this, you are still able to manipulate the photo pretty much how you want, but it won't be nearly as flexible as the 12MP when it comes to denoising and sharpening especially.
@@TheDroneGeek Ok that makes perfect sense BUT !!!!!!!!! half the people online are claiming it is a native 12mp and the other half native 48 or 50mp... so either one side is right and ur right... or the other side are right and its the exact opposite of what ur saying... us mere mortals have no chance
This one is more subjective than you’d think. Yes, the upscaled resolution is great in the 48/50MP, but I like to have more control over my edits. Some people care less about that flexibility and want a “ready” image right off the camera. It just depends in what means more to you.
To me this 3s is big disappointment, autel introduced their drones with 1inch sensor and veriable aperture 2 year ago, in addition Dji did step back with 1/1.3 after Mavic air 2s...footage from Air3 looks good but is it enough high lvl deserved for 2024...im not sure
The sound production on this video sucks. It's a pain to listen to
Talking shit about production quality when your channel is utter dogshit. No value. No personality. Stay in your lane, chump.
@@TheDroneGeek
Wow. Instead of saying "Thank you for pointing out where im making a mistake as 8m not reviewing my videos before uploading them so i would never know something is wrong until someone would tell me. It's a valuable feedback and my audience deserves for the best" you have decided to shit on the messanger. How wise!
BTW, I am not and I am not trying to he a youtuber so you pointing out that my YT channel sucks doesn't make any sense. Are you going to ridicule me because i have zero subscribers and you have 50?
It was my first visit on your channel but because it turned out that you are an asshole I'm not going to make that mistake again.
Good job champ