Ford Is FALLING BEHIND! 2024 GMC Sierra HD VS 2023 Ford Super Duty
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 июн 2023
- Today I compare a 2024 GMC Sierra 3500 to a 2023 Ford F-350!
Full Review: • 2024 GMC Sierra 3500 V...
Ask For David: www.nationalbuickgmc.com/ 
Авто/Мото
Full Review: ruclips.net/video/KYuP8m1qphU/видео.html
Just so you know its not £ its #
If you’re going to do these videos, double check your auto-generated subtitles. More than a few of these quick reviews have glaring typos in them.
They're both too expensive.
Hard picks for soccer mom
I guess I don't see how Ford is falling behind? They have more power and torque and a new look.
Edit: I stumbled across this video 9 months later. Nice to know it's still here. Lmao
Well it looks like Sh** for starters… reliability on the new power strokes isn’t what they use to be etc.
@Mike Honcho looks are subjective, too. While I don't exactly love the new look, it isn't ugly to my eyes.
That and there is a reason the 6.7 powerstroke is still around 12 years later. Because it is fairly reliable Power plant. That and developing a new diesel engine is expensive in a world that is uncertain if we are gonna be driving ICE cars in the next 20 years.
@@mikehoncho4472 GM trannys don’t last over 100k. I’m a technician for a gmc dealer 🙃
Edit: I know work at a Dodge, Jeep, RAM, Fiat, Chrysler dealership. I work on Cummins everyday only and I’ve only done 1 transmission in the months of august. At GMC I did about 10-15.
@@obamaatemyson5297thats why you sell everything before the warranty expires lol. And if you got 90k to buy a truck, you're not worried a about $$ 😎
It looks like the Lego version of a superduty
Still trying to figure out how Ford’s headlights are rounded off.
Lol. I’ve never owned a truck and I caught that too.
“Fords super rounded headlights.”
Like, Wut? They’re actually probably the most squared headlights of any vehicle on the market. Or at least that I can think of.
Literally the most squared off headlight I have seen 😂😂😂
They're rounded off compared to the previous one dummy
He was referring to the trim around the headlight it is very round irl
I assume he was talking about the curves?
You forgot the most important part: They both cost as much as a decent house did 9 years ago.
Bro is definitely the type of guy not to get bed liner.
Yea bro cause you definitely need a bed liner to carry your groceries
@@BillyBlock17It helps regardless of what you do with your truck
@@BillyBlock17bro the purpose of buying a truck is to have a functional utilitarian vehicle capable of doing various tasks. Need to help someone move? Done. Need to pickup furniture cause you don't want to get shafted by delivery fees? Done. Want to go camping with all your cooking gear, tents, etc? Done.
Of course there's an added bonus of aesthetics but go ahead and try doing any of the above with a compact SUV. As for large SUVs, you're essentially buying a pigeonholed truck at that point. Chasis is most likely truck, but unlike a truck you can't remove the camper shell cause it's all part of the body from factory.
@@Redditor6079couldn’t think of a worse vehicle for moving furniture.
@@PiOfficial you're absolutely right! Better to just stuff that brand new furniture in an SUV or a car, better yet strap it to the top so everyone on the road knows that you don't know what you're doing and to avoid you.
Solid front axle is far superior in heavy duty trucks
It’s like a riding in a lumber wagon, though compared to a Duramax
most of them ended up on the suburbs hauling only the ass of the driver
Just got to get some kryptonite, tire rod ends
@@Oils36 it’s made for towing not for riding nice.
@@AnglerDanNEdon’t mean you gotta sacrifice comfort just to tow? That don’t make sense, some semis use air suspension and ride like a cloud
You sealed the deal with the Ford having extremely significant more horsepower and torque and 2 straight axles. No "HD truck" even in the light duty class has a damn IFS. Nuff said
I think the 2019+ ram 1500s have it
@@xCkillaxC the only "HD trucks" even in the light duty segment that have 2 straight axles are the Ram 2500s and above and thr F250 and above. Infact there are only 3 vehicles left in total that come with 2 straight axles. The jeep wrangler being the 3rd
@@xCkillaxC Dodge introduced IFS on the 1500s with the 3rd gen trucks in 2002.
But 1500s aren't "HD Trucks", they're light duty.
John Deere has independent front suspension options for their 8000 series tractors.
@@ElectronsOnly since when? I’d like to see a picture😂
The Ford is actually a real work horse, more power and a stronger suspension. The GM is the one falling behind
Until something breaks on the engine at 70k miles and you cant get the parts from Ford and no aftermarket parts exist
@@digi3218 Ive never seen a 6.7L PSD break at 70k, at work we just ran 2 past 200K without major issues, 3 are between 160 and 180k and 3 more are at between 60 and 100K and none have broken. All are solid and the few issues they have had have been minor.
I personally own a 2012 Raptor with the 6.2L boss engine, it has 184K and it runs like a dream. Ive seen many chevy 5.3L V8s fail before 120K with collapsed lifters and the 6.2L LS Gm engine Ive seen fail with as few as 80-85K miles.
The ford has the high output 6.7 not the regular and all it takes for the gmc to catch up is a simple tune soooo less the the high output 6.7 option
@@jibrilthegreat35 our 2018 f250 6.2l gas was having problems and couldn't get the parts from Ford. Traded it in for a Chevy
@jibrilthegreat35 it is really rare for the 5.3 vortex to fail. It is one of the most reliable engines lol. I'd take any Chevy with a 5.3 over a Ford any day.
All I heard was better things about the ford. I’d much rather have a solid front axle on a truck that big
Imagine comparing a lariat to a fully loaded sierra
Dmn i need a new comment section wtf Gm meat riders goin crazy💀🤣🤣
At4 isn’t fully loaded
@@logandavies5950 almost
At4 really isn’t loaded much. That one is geared more towards competing with the powerwagon or tremor. The Denali and Denali ultimates are way more loaded than a at4 or at4x . I use to do the pre delivery inspections on gmc trucks when I worked for gmc.
Yea and the sierra is still better in every way possible
@@dirtymax6.649 not every way the ford tows more hauls more it’s faster has more horse power and torque it looks better it is better and it’s a fx4 a base model dumbass
guess fords falling behind when its the best selling truck on the market for 47 years straight
Because GM splits between two brands.
@@wymple09 excuses 🤣🤣
Given Ford's track record, I would take the Ford.
Me too 👍🏼
Ford's track record is horrible. Their CEO even admitted they need to step up their game.
@wymple09 if they are what is chevy that needs a government bailout every 5 years
What track record?
Solid front axle. Had me sold at that.
What’s the advantage of a solid front axle?
@@thediamondlord8528better grip, more articulation, stronger
You don't have to replace weak ass CV axles
Yeah just love the factory standard death wobble.
@@full---movie No instead you get to replace the junk hub locks on your Ford and throw parts at death wobble at low mileage.
Gmc is primarily a luxury brand. Ford has luxury trucks, but they do not have a true luxury branded truck, as they discontinued that a long time ago. Fords trucks are meant to be work trucks. Gmc can be work trucks, but you never really see that and they know thats not their market. Ford isnt falling behind, these trucks serve 2 different purposes.
Brand new, nice.
My 2021 f150 lariat has one of the best interiors I’ve seen I love it
I'm gonna have to hard disagree with you here. GM trucks is what I want in a work truck. But a Denali has nothing on a platinum
GMC became more of a luxury brand in the mid to late 90s before that they where considered for medium/heavy duty use like cab overs and 5500-6500 trucks so no GMC is not primarily a luxury brand they still offer base model work trucks.
@@Timmyval123 platinum is a upper mid level trim. You can option a lariat out like a platinum. The limited is the highest end trim. Platinum is still nice . Of course ford makes luxury trucks and of course gmc makes work trucks. The original poster has no idea what he’s talking about. You can get a gmc base model optioned just like the Chevy base model.
I’ll preface this by saying that I’m not brand loyal and currently own a ram. The ford looks better, it has more power, a better drivetrain, and the infotainment system doesn’t freeze constantly like the GM does. He made exactly zero arguments on behalf of the GM. 🤣🤣🤣
GM infotainment doesn't freeze at all, the previous headunits that came in the last 5-10 were slow or delayed. But the ones in the new redesigned truck are super quick, a lot more responsive then ford.
@archiemacmurchy8308 the guy never owned one obviously the ford has looked the same since like 2016
@@ToymonkeyjrMine crashed several times and then went out completely. Sold the GMC after that. Nothing is built well by General Motors.
@@fanofbama14 Gm early late 90's early 2000's are proper, electronics went out, everything else was bulletproof if you took care of it.
@@Toymonkeyjryeah the older generations of most brands work a lot longer and better
I had a Duramax, it was in the shop 4 times because they use Isuzu parts . I have a Ford Power stroke now and I have been happy so far :)
2011 Chevy Colorado worst Chevy we ever bought engine blew at 130k miles
Rebadged Isuzu engine 5 cylinder
The L5P is not made by izusu..it’s an in house gm engine
🧢
@@JCMustang well, the L5P isnt exactly new
The gmc looks nicer but that’s about it ,the ford has more power/torque and a live axle
The interior colors are the same. Wtf?
Most common color in vehicles interior and not bad looking
Hook up 15k trailer behind them and I’ll find out real quick that 6.7 is the real truck.
Ive hauled more than that with a 6.6… more than enough power to maintain speed up hills. We went from NH to MO, no problem.
Until it grenades
Who’s concerned with being quick pulling a 15K trailer??
We had a new Duramax and a 6.7. Both great trucks but the 6.7 ate the 6.6 alive when pulling in the hills
GMC won’t have trouble with towing that
Still prefer ford because of the design and better reliability
That’s funny that Fords mid trim lariat is better in every way compared to a fully loaded gmc 😂
A fully loaded gmc is the Denali ultimate not the at4
So basically ford makes a more useful truck in the fields of work it's built for but yet it's falling behind because GM keeps getting rid of all the work associated things and replacing them with luxury bs that you can also get in the ford minus OnStar which is shit and a pain in the ass on its own
Yeah this guy is more of a consumer not really a you know a tradesman or something He's more like I like this truck has Bluetooth and not all I like this truck can haul more than the last generation
The GMC can do just about everything the Ford can do in the “fields of work”. The design actually warrants its price point as it is a better well rounded premium work truck. It’s undeniably nicer than the Ford. Another FF *Ford fanboy* pissed off reviewers aren’t giving Ford credit for squeezing the most power out of their power plants and reliability suffering because of it solely to win a “power number on paper” war.
It’s the same reason y’all are PRESSED GM hasn’t acknowledged the Ford Raptor segment. They built a Cadillac Escalade V instead which Ford can’t compete with. Continuing to be unbothered and paying Ford Raptor complete and utter dust. It’s not about who can produce the most power because if GM wanted to play that game they’d win _it_ too. This is the same company who just built the world’s most powerful naturally aspirated V8. SLAP YOURSELVES.
@G-Rated but yet I had to turn my 2023 gmc 3500 SLE with the integrated pto into my run around truck because it couldn't handle as bad of terrain as my 4 2022 f350's with non high output 6.7s. Ford has proven their use for me and my line of work and chevy/gmc hasn't been able to handle it. I don't care what any chevy tard says the f350 is and always will be the best option unless you're a yuppie crab bucket or a soccer mom
@@G-Rateddid read your whole comment, but when it comes to a truck that is going to be put to work, for me it’s almost always going to be ford, solid front vs IFS becomes a pretty big difference for a work truck
@@G-Rated except that when you're towing is much weight as these trucks can tow you're really going to feel that 300 less pound feet of torque
GMC just looks good but ford is made for actual work not looking like a princess 👸
Bruh they’re both great trucks both are made for work. And since they’re both high trims they’re both probably gonna be owned by some wanna be that doesn’t do shit with them.
They’re both equal for work trucks. Very small minority are buying a Denali or platinum for a true beater work truck
Yeh if you consider crushing suburbs and hauling groceries actual work 😂😂
@@yyfreak1637no dummy, GMC/ Chevy doesn't make real work trucks, they tell you that so if you're foolish enough to buy it for that purpose. Even Dodge doesn't make a real work truck.
Ford bodies are made of aluminum, GMs and Rams are made of steel, so who's the princess? Everytime I see these 2015+ fords all I think about is "Look but don't touch"
Ford use to have the nicest front end till 2023
its grown on me tbh
mustve forgot ram
In my opinion, since 2019 GM has messed up the design of thier trucks. Ford has a classy design which i like much more.
The Ford looks fucking horrible lmao. But I agree, I liked GM trucks for their square/rectangle designs, which peaked in 2016-18. Ford was looking pretty good for 17-22 but did a 180 on the ‘23 to give it the ugliest fascia ever designed on an American truck.
I like Ford better, it has a solid front axle. 👍
What does it mean to have a solid front axle? What makes it superior? I’m buying my first truck and am quite curious.
@@relativelyunknown5663solid axels are where the bar connecting to both tires and connected while independent are 2 bars not connected. Thats best way I can explain indepedent is whats on all or most RC cars where if you push down the car will push down solid axels wont do that solid axels better for towing
Is better gmc
Ain't no gm product has ever bested a Ford.
Many has
Fords reliability is all time low. So is gm tho lol
@@tedbear6012 I can’t agree with that
@@lil_pe3p no HD truck is good true off roader
@@lil_pe3p they are too big and heavy
Thank you for making ford the obvious buy over the Sierra.👍🏼
Tell me you’re biased towards GM without telling me you are biased towards GM.
Platinum (with tremor or fx4) vs AT4 would be more accurate. Also please do a limited vs Denali ultimate (when you can).
Technically it’d be a Limited vs Ultimate
Platinum would be compared to Denali and Limited to Denali Ultimate. The Lariat to AT4 is a perfect comparison.
@@_jg00 A limited is not a denali ultimate lmao.
@@Toymonkeyjrit is lmao platinum vs Denali and limited or king ranch vs Denali ultimate
@@jeangrey3045 I can tell you don't know trucks because king ranch is under both platinum and limited so it wouldn't be a Denali ultimate.
So the ford makes more power and has a stronger solid front axle but you're giving credit to the gmc because of looks.... Totally make sense
Inferior truck with more power you say? Who cares. *gm* lost interest in the power numbers on paper war a long time ago. They’re focusing on quality, long term reliability and efficient performance. The Sierra HD doesn’t need 1,200 ft. lbs of torque in order to be a superior truck to the Ford HD.
@@G-Rated lmfao you think GMC is quality... that's why a used GMC sierra drops in value drastically every year while the ford f350 still has a price tag similar to MSRP. And clearly you don't know anything about trucks. Both of these trucks are meant for heavy load towing and the gmc sierra is inferior in every way for what it's built for. You are the typical US consumer..sees something shiny so it must be better.
It isn’t though. GM material quality is below Ford, GM towing is below Ford, Ford’s seats are among the most comfy in the industry, and the tech it comes with is more functionally useful than the GMC. Not to mention that the grille on the Sierras that aren’t the 1500 all look ugly as shit.
Powers not everything sometimes comfort and reliability are also important
@@The-fs5wnthose ford seats are like bricks
FORD FIR THE WIN 🏆
Don't forget to include the 20 different recalls that comes with the Ford
GM still not better. 😂😂 IFS in an HD truck? What kind of crap is that?
GMC selling a 3500 HD truck with independent front suspension is laughable… Ford wins on that fact alone.
You misspelled loses. Give me one good reason an IFS is a downgrade? Straight axles belong in the 1800s.
Ok for the last time they both have IFS. Chevy simply has control arm style while Ford has Beam style, and it is definitely true that beam style is more durable. But its still IFS, and both brands have had IFS on their trucks since the 60's.
@@josephg41 “simply has control arm style” don’t try and minimize the difference between the two.
It’s colloquially understood that a solid tube axel w/knuckles and radius arms is a “solid axel”. Meanwhile the control arm style suspension w/cv axels and rubber boots can also be found on a Honda Civic.
@@tarnantula While thats true, solid axle Is traditionally and more accurately an axle on which the two wheels cannot move independently from the other, and in that sense, no modern light duty truck has a solid axle, And they haven't for some time. Not trying to minimize the difference between control arm and Beam style, Beam style is inherently much more durable always has been. All I'm saying is that there is no "Solid axle" on a modern light duty truck, they all have Independent front suspension, the difference is how each brand accomplishes that.
@@Furyswipesbecause they are more durable for pulling/ 4x4 offroading. Although I don't think someone who spends 90k on a truck would do much offroading. Also please stfu, you have said so much about how solid front axles are bad and why ifs is much better in other comments on the topic. The truth of the matter is ifs rides better while a solid front axle is more durable. Proof of this is that many jeeps and other off-road and heavy duty vehicles of the like, along with military trucks use a solid front axle. That should be reason enough to prove the durability of a solid front axle setup. Ifs is a more comfortable ride, but it is not usually better for heavy duty or off-road conditions unless you are building a prerunner or pulling heavier loads on occasion. But I know you aren't trying to factually argue, you are a gm fanboy that doesn't like when your favorite truck brand is shit on, which is pathetic. Trucks are trucks. Some are better for things that others aren't and that's the way it is. It is pointless to turn the truck world into a dick measuring contest because of brand loyalty and fanboying.
Bro the ford is better in almost every way. More power, More torque, solid front axle whish is what you want on a heavy duty truck anyways. The interiors look almost the same too. So how is the gmc better?
Ben wants more comments on his videos
It's not better though, have you owned one? I have. Both GMC & Ford. Powerstroke drivetrain is a joke. Breaks down ALL THE TIME. Ford is junk. That's a real world opinion. Dodge Ram & G.M. trucks are better than Ford.
@@OGS2099probably owned a super early 6.7 or a 6.0 or 6.4 all pretty mid trucks newer 6.7s and 7.3s are great
@@ceementality 6.7 2018, absolute junk POS. Engine & transmission. Junk.
@@OGS2099 ford is the most reliable American brand stop the cap you really said fiat i mean ram lmao go to any shop you will see tons of GM and fiat trucks but hardly any ford trucks
You buy a Ford when you want to be somebody. You buy a GMC when you are somebody.
Yes: when you have work to do vs when you want a pavement princess.
Gay Mexicans Cadillac
That ford is beautiful
I disagree with the rounded look, to me it highlights the border of the boxy grill where the gmc is still just as boxy but in the upper corners
Power stroke sure ain’t fallin behind tho, damn. Wonder when GM is gonna put out a 1000+ ftlbs torque with the DMAX.
I'm actually going to say they can get 1000 ft lbs but might be limited drive limited. An extra 2 psi would have pushed it past 975 ft lbs of torque but the transmission didn't take it kindly during testing.
The duramax can easily put down 1k torque if it wanted to. A Banks has already tuned/upgraded one with 1300 Hp and 1500 torque.
It’d blow its self up from factory with all the emissions 😂
@@brarautorepairs ford and GM Co-Designed the 10 speed transmission so they are very similar if not the same, so why would fords hold up but not GM’s?
@@jakefournie5930 ford designed their tranny and gave gm the plans. Gm then changed the pump location to the back and down sized it. A lot of the tranny is similar but gm lightened things up
I rather take the super duty, but I like any super duty truck
the solid front axle doesn’t provide a comfortable ride, it provides an insanely reliable work truck that truly has the power to get the job done.
If you want a work truck that is reliable.. Ford all day. GMC is nice but, there's a reason why Ford trucks are number 1. Lol.
We have all three major brands at work and the Fords are in the shop more than dodge or chevy surprisingly... And it's a fleet of 37 trucks definitely not just a fluke.. started fazing the fords out this year until they fix the stupid issues
@@freedomfox8183 my 21 6.7 has 120k with a 30 foot flatbed and it still runs and drives like it did brand new, most of the dudes that do what i do use the exact same platform and have near the same mileage with little to no issues
Because of the price
@@freedomfox8183 but you also gotta take into account that the F series outsells any other truck in the industry. So if they sell 3 times as more trucks, then logically there would be 3 times as much in the shop
@@freedomfox8183 yea because fords are the most common truck lol
Keep in mind that one is aluminum and the other is steel
And the steel one has a transmission that won’t last 50k miles. New Chevy build quality is dogshit aids. Plus they look like shit
Keep in mind that aluminum is one of the most common materials used in aircraft construction…. Are you afraid to fly because it’s aluminum?
And yet still beats gm is crash tests and durability😂
Not entirely true. GM actually uses a lot of aluminum body panels on their trucks. The bed is still made of steel unless you get the carbon fiber bed but if you destroy that you’ll wish you hadn’t bought it. But aluminum’s way more resistant to corrosion. And the ads gm put out about how much stronger the steel bed it’s were proven by many third parties to be rigged to make the fords bed look a lot more fragile than they actually are .
Seems like Ford is focused on working while GMC is focused on dads with a big ego lol. The solid front axle in the Ford says it all 😂
GMC fans start talking when you can get over 1000 pound feet of torque. 😂
If ford ever goes to a independent front suspension (IFS) they would lose a massive amount of respect from me
You mean on a heavy duty truck? I'm pretty sure an independent suspension is fine for a light duty truck. Many trucks are now being used as family sedans because no man wants a minivan.
Only for two wheel drive
I’m pretty sure the F150’s have IFS in there 4wd models if I’m not mistaken I know my classmate had a 2019 F150 4wd that had IFS
Though in heavy duty trucks it’s not so great, yes ride quality is better but that’s not what a heavy duty truck is made for
You must have never driven in an IFS. Best ride you'll ever have in a truck.
@@Furyswipes I have, my dads duramax doesn’t ride that much different than my 7.3 f350
A solid front axle isn't a disadvantage if it is a heavy duty vehicle. I'm pretty sure they did testing on different suspension setups and found this was just the best design overall (cost, towing capacity, total weight capacity and ride).
Tell me you work for GMC without telling me you work for GMC
There’s a reason the ford f series is the number one selling vehicle in America for 40 plus years, not saying the gm is bad in any way though.
Those are literal semi truck power numbers. Crazy. Not too sure about how the power stroke is in terms of reliability but the duramax should be solid. I like the ford solid front axle too
The PS 6.7 and 7.3 are two of the most reliable motors in existence, with the 5.9 Cummins smashed in between them.
The 6.7L is a great engine, has a 2012 that had 200K miles when I traded it for a 2022 also with the 6.7L very strong and reliable engine.
200 more torque is falling behind?
Gm doesn’t use false numbers unlike ford and ram who just say that to break the 1000 pound feet mark
@@logandavies5950 sure!!! Show some data.
@@logandavies5950 GM inflates their tow and payload specs all the time. Whereas Ford and RAM both are capable of pushing 1K lb-ft in the real world, but neither company is stupid enough to program the ECU to deliver that power under all circumstances.
@@logandavies5950they have tested them before they arent false 😭
Not really that knowledgable about trucks, but I always find it interesting how wide the gap is between torque and horsepower on these. I assume it's because these monsters are designed for hauling.
UAW wants 40% wage increases. UPS salaries got them thinking
The real question is. Which one is easier to change the headlights?
The 6.7 is easy to change headlights on if youre not a dingus… i can change mine in under 10 minutes lol
Eh, the ford has better power output. And Franky, if you’re purchasing a Ute for the purpose of actually using it for what it’s built to do, that’s what matters.
Gm doesn’t use false numbers to put them over the 1000 pound feet of torque
@@logandavies5950 the new high output powerstroke makes 1200 torque at the crank. There’s no lies being told here partner
So according to your Ford fanboy logic, if you’re not producing the most power in the segment then your truck ain’t powerful enough to use for actual work activities? #PleaseKeepGoing
@@G-Rated cute hashtag. No. You can buy the less powerful option if you’d like. Not sure why you would though. Especially cause gm’s less powerful option is connected to a dogshit transmission sitting on dogshit suspension. And rams less powerful option is also connected to a dogshit transmission, sitting in a dogshit body. I’d still buy a ram over a gm though. IFS doesn’t belong on anything related to work. Great for play. Not for working.
@@logandavies5950 Ford always underrates their power figures they always make more power than advertised but with shitvrolet you are lucky to get close to the horsepower they say their boat anchors make
By the numbers Ford wins…. Both are beautiful
If you are trying to compare apples to apples, you need to compare the Sierra AT4 to a Super Duty Platinum Tremor.
GMC looks a lot better.
Ford is ahead on recalls though.
Yea this is true my truck got a recall on the damn trailer brakes
Ford has good forward visibility.
There's no comparison Ford wins 😂😂😂
One is to haul the other is for mall parking lots.
Heyy, the GMC can also be used for taking the kids to soccer practice, not just malls. 😂😂😂
Thank god Im never getting either of these
How is the Ford falling behind when this video just shows how the Ford is better?😂
Guess what
Ford guys gon buy Fords
GM guys gon buy GMC/Chevy
Ain’t that crazy 🤯
Ford is the goat 💪
Of recalls and rainbows 🌈. Woke ass company
The gmc looks so much better cuz it doesn’t look like a usb port and doesn’t have number 3 headlights
Like the gmc don't have ugly stop sign wheel wells and chicken wing mirrors.
the ford has way more horsepower and torque, looks better with its new design, and has a much nicer interior in the platinum, limited, or king ranch, but you showed the lariat
GMC and Ford proving that NO ONE IN THE WORLD CAN MEASURE UP TO AMERICAN TRUCKS. No wonder people will pay $100k for these masterpieces. My God, they are amazing.
The gmc is literally 110k if you go to the dealership
Canadian yes
Not close a at4 would be around 85k like this
@@JoshuaOverman talking about the diesel, so 110 is correct
But the f350 your looking about 120k or more
Ford is built like a REAL truck meant for work with solid front axle not the sissy ifs meant for cars
OK boomer
@@stevenb4799 “tHiS iS mY cOiN cOlLeCtIoN.” Spoken like a true virgin 😂😂😂
Grow up noob
@@WeWuzKangzNsheeet You really went to his channel to insult him? Now that's a true virgin move 😂
Silly BC. Didn’t you know the GM is made for highway driving and not jobsites?
Essentially the only win the GM trucks have is the nicer dashboard design. But everything else Ford is better
Now stack up a King Ranch to an AT4
Gmc the goat
You can not be an HD goat if you have IFS, real heavy duty trucks dont have IFS😂
Ford every time
Ford will be on the road while the gmc is in the shop🤷♂️
I prefer the Ford; I even like that new front end everyone initially hated on.
hey i used to work at the american fork national! that’s cool man gmc for me!
Clearly biased you should review cars not trucks. You got no idea
Let’s be honest the HD and super duty are mostly used for work, if you were buying a truck for looks just get a Denali
Exactly
The GMC headlights are basically the 2009-2014 F150 headlight.
Gmc also has:
Less power.
Weaker front end.
Good video.
GM dealer attempting to make the GMC look better than the ford with no actual evidence that makes it better. Ford is proven more reliable, has more HP, and also why does GM’s “HD” truck have IFS? No 2500 or 3500 should have IFS.
Agreed
The only thing falling behind will be that GMC when it breaks down.
I blinked and literally didn't notice the interior change until the video restarted
Built Ford tough...more power, more torque, more towing capacity, solid axles, a real work horse. Less bells & whistles and more power. Thats it.
Ford is not falling behind. Maverick, Bronco, Bronco Sport, Lightning, etc. they are doing just fine.
He’s talking about diesels
Obviously falling behind when they can’t even get a high trim level out anymore and the 2023s are missing hood liners and missing folding rear head rest and cheaper inside materials
GMC, the company where there most recent years of trucks are blowing up left & right with tons of other issues, is outdoing Ford, whose only problem is usually technology issues with there recent years of trucks?
Not only do you do subpar shorts with lackluster showing of vehicles compared to other vehicle reviewers, you also throw some stupid takes out as well.
Those takes may get you click’s & comments, but it’s not getting you any subscribers, or people who will stick around that’s for sure…
FORD FANATICS SAY THE SILLIEST OF THINGS - you ok over there?
Write another paragraph on a RUclips short so I can also not read that
@@hellboy-xo9ho You’ll still drop a whiny comment under it for me though right?
@@tehclefty5317 the funniest thing to me is when people write essays online
Bro also the solid front axle is actually better for towing
This guy: Calls square head lights round. 😂😂😂
It's a Lariat.
this is a terrible review lol
I’ve driven the ford. It has so much torque it’s crazy. It’s fast as hell for a 3500 series. I think it’s faster than my 2020 10 speed 2wd f-150 with a 5.0. It might not be but damn it pulls.
GMC can make their trucks look at cool as they want, they'll never replace Ford as a work truck, and that's where the money is.
Of course the most comparable gm fully loaded at4x vs a Fx4 lariat
Literally not even an AT4X lol, at4s ccome that loaded and that was a decently loaded lariat. And you know whats funny that lariat costs more
@Thepedell came here to say just that. I have that 24 GMC 3500 AT4, definitely not an X (i wish though)
@@lawnchair76 how do you like it? I have an ultimate dually coming in 2 weeks. And excited but nervous
@Thepedell I absolutely love it. Don't have the space in the garage for a dually but you will be happy for sure. I also don't like chrome so the AT4 was the easiest to delete the remaining chrome. And mine fully loaded was just under 88k.
@lawnchair76 was actually the whole reason I went with ultimate can't stand the damn chrome. The black chrome looks nice though. Definitely gonna strip/coat whatever is left to have to flush. Great to hear though and enjoy it!
Ford will always be superior when it’s comes to work trucks
Thank God I will buy one for myself
Ford got a face only a mother could love
It will still outsell the GMC 😂😂
Aerodynamics has left the chat :)
When ur towing aerodynamics doesn’t mean anything
@@logandavies5950 duh!!!
Sounded like you weren’t really comparing but telling us the specs and really emphasizing that you like the ford better.
The ford did significantly better in off-road applications. I would personally still pick the gm