This is unequivocally the most well articulated review of the D500 I've seen. I already own the camera, but found myself watching this a couple times, learning things about the camera I had overlooked. Thank you.
After moving to the d500 from a d5600 this video has been incredible. Thank you so much for the time and effort you put into this. Very much appreciated! You are a wonderful teacher sir!
i have owned this camera for 6 months now and still found this video very helpful. i did not know about f6 custom setting concerning release button and dial options, love it! thanks and great job!!
Having seen some of your previous reviews of the Nikon DX cameras, I expected a thorough and detailed treatment for the D500 as well. I was not disappointed. Well done and thank you!!
Thanks for your kind words. As I explained in a recent video, the opportunity to do these kinds of videos may no longer exist. ruclips.net/video/nf4quNLi2m4/видео.html
Wow..... Now that's a tutorial that makes you want to go out and buy this camera straight away, even if you don't have a pilots licence or a degree in metaphysics..... Well I know which camera I will be buying soon and I will not have problems knowing how to use it because this video explains it in depth and easy to follow. Congratulations on this fantastic video
I try to take care to explore and explain all of the features and functions - so thank you for recognizing the time that takes. I'd be tempted too, but if you have an investment in Canon lenses, I'd also have a look at some recent Canon models - I'm still waiting for Canon Canada's 80D review unit to arrive ...
I love your review. It is really interesting and I learnt new options that I wouldn't figure out without this video. I have the D500 and it's indeed a good choice. I will try them once I am back home on Montreal in February. Thanks for giving your precious time to learn people about photography. It is a great step in our time where the world is becoming more ignorant than ever.
my god.. Maarten you are the master of the d500.... I had to slow the video to .5 speed to soak up every technical nuance... Excellent Depth yet simple presentation!
19:31 It's used in certain situations, like formatting your card, so you don't spaz out and accidentally format your card when you didn't want to. It's easy to just automatically hit the "ok" on the multi-selector on the right side of the camera back without thinking because of muscle memory, etc. Making you hit a button you rarely use for doing potentially catastrophic things (like formatting a card on accident and losing thousands of photos) is a good safeguard to have in place.
The way Nikon's menus are programmed it does. They don't have an "Are you SURE you want to..." dialog pop up. Which again, if it's on the same button, then muscle memory from constantly pressing the button could still result in an accident. It is better to make you stop and think and have to physically use a different button.
Hey, difference of opinion makes the world go around. We'll just have to agree to disagree, and there's nothing wrong with that. :) Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Take care.
Hi Maarten - I'm curious how far you would push the ISO when filming indoors to maintain good video quality (shooting in 4K)? I have a shoot coming up that will be in a conference room, using a three point light setup (talking head video). I'll be using a fixed 2.8 lens and will have it wide open, shutter 1/60. Thoughts?
Depending on how much light the fixtures provide, sounds like you should be fine without pushing ISO. In general, higher ISOs are less visible/noticeable in video. That said, my preference is always to increase the lighting over the ISO, as a good lighting setup always provides better definition.
Excellent video and very professionally done. It kept me focused (LOL). Others should watch you before they do videos. They always ramble and stray from the subject matter. I wind up either fast forwarding or just stopping the video. Another good RUclipsr is Olivia Speranza and the gentleman from The Camera Store videos.
Very impressive video review......shows that one does not have to be too opinionated to be a good reviewer. I'm subscribing to hear more from you. Keep up the good work :- )
Great in-depth and understandable review as always. As I said before to you I shall purchase this one day. Along with the Nikon D750, Fuji XT2, Panasonic GH4 and GH5 as well as Panasonic New Bridge Camera with 4K.
***** Thanks for your hard work! Gosh, you are travelling to Paris (for leisure, presumbly) and yet still have to 'work'. Then there is writing the script and editing them together into a cohesive and coherent piece. Not easy indeed.
Please don't call this "work". I get a great deal of enjoyment from learning about and thinking about cameras - as well as shooting and editing videos. Those activities have just become part of the routine - and I'm very lucky that Kim is also a happy assistant.
Almost four years after this was posted to RUclips, this is still an interesting and informative video. I am gathering my pennies towards buying a Nikon D500 with 16-80mm lens. I look forward to buying the camera. As your video shows, this is a very powerful tool for both stills and video.
HI LOOKING FOR MY FIRST DSLR LOVE NIKON IM A MUSICIAN LOOKING FOR LOW LIGHT STILLS AND video 4k... waiting for new d760 or d620 full frame should I wait or buy d500????thx JOE
I'm sure they'll all be good choices - improve low light performance with good lenses - she of the best concert photos were taken in the days when cameras/film had very low ISOs - with ISOs usable at 6400 and over, these would all be fine.
EXCELLENT review. Unbiased and EXTREMELY comprehensive. Thank you Maarten. Just one comment; people complain about Sony E mount menus... but compared to Canon the menu and control system for this camera is VERY complicated and non-intuitive.
An Excellent observation... and therein lies the key to understanding!!! Canon user knows canon menus. Nikon users know Nikon... and Sony users know Sony. It's crossing over from one manufacturer to another that creates this issue and perception. Again, THANKS for your EXCELLENT reviews... you are one of the best.
Excellent review / tutorial.....the best I've seen. Just one small point.....the ISO setting mentioned @2.47 is actually 51,200, not 51.2 as you stated. I've used my D500 at this setting and the results are very good and below about ISO 30,000 they are excellent :-)
Su bloqueo de mayúsculas está atascado. Con disculpas, no conozco esos cables ... ¿para qué se utilizan? ¿Ha comprobado con Nikon, o ha buscado con Google?
I'm leaning toward the D500 for myself and the D7200 for my wife, what 3 or 4 lens do you recommend. Here is what we are thinking about Nikon zoom 17-55 f2.8 DX G ED, Nikon zoom 200-500 f5.6 ED AR, Nikon zoom 24-70 f2.8 G and the Tokina AT-X PRO D 100 f2.8 macro.
Sounds like a nice lean, and good choices. I'm not familiar with all of those lenses, but I do find that the Nikon lens recommendations made by wirecutter provide good advice.
Congratulations on the explanation, when someone really knows about photography is evident, I'm very tired of watching videos that do not explain anything and often add lies to the description, thank you
I broke my 70-300 mm AF S lens which I was told was no longer made and I could not find one so I faced the conundrum that the AF-P 70-300 mm lens was not compatible with my D300. I had waited a long time for its successor so decided to buy the D500 (finally!). Do you have any experience with the new AF-P series? My lens is the FX version not the less expensive DX version. I really appreciate your review of the D500. I have used it to take bird photos with some superb results. I loved your extensive review. Thanks.
Oh dear. But I'm sure you're happy with the D500. The Af-P lenses are newer with "pulse" focus motors, which are faster and quieter. They generally abstract more of the control switches found on the lens to options in the camera menu. As you undoubtedly have already figured out, the FX lenses are of superior quality. Thank you for your kind words, always appreciated.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks so much for the great review. I sometimes feel overwhelmed by Nikon's instruction manuals which are so long. I will watch your video a few times as it explains so much! The AF-P lens allows you to get about a foot closer (shorter focus distance than the AF-S). Perhaps because of that, the birds don't like the sound of the focus motor, which really is very quiet. The lens I broke was insured. The D300 survived the fall, the lens did not. I have used the D500 for about 8 months and still have a lot to learn but am so glad I have it! I love both camera and lens. Thanks again. --loved your Paris photos, too!
I always enjoy Paris, it was great to shoot it with the D500, which was not nearly as cumbersome as I anticipated. Thanks again, I do appreciate reading kind words from my viewers.
I don't know about a specific name, I don't think this is specific to Nikon either, but the point is that "focus by wire" would mean that turning the ring engages a focus motor which in turn moves the focusing group. What is happening here instead is that the ring is mechanically moving the focusing group, but is disengaged while autofocus is working; in manual focus, when you reach either end of the travel of the focusing group, the ring is also disengaged (you can continue turning it, but it moves nothing).
I see, most lenses with an AF/MF clutch have to be manually switched from one to the other, so this is an interesting solution. I appreciate the clarification.
Do you mean the HDMI clip that comes with the camera? Not sure where/how to replace that - maybe Nikon. Here's an alternative, which also works with other cameras and other types of connectors - bhpho.to/2Bpp9L7
Right now I currently have a d7000 and when photographing in low light my photos come out EXTREMELY noisy. Was looking at strictly full frame cameras (d810 mostly) for low light stuff (mostly very low light bar concerts). Will this camera do well enough to make me not regret getting the d810? I love a lot of the features the d500 has. But if I'm going to get less results in low light, I'd rather have the d810. But I have seem images where the d810 does WORSE in low light than the d500. I'm very confused. Sorry for the long post. Basically, what I'm really asking is, will the d500-even though it's still crop- do HIGHLY better than the d7000 in low low light and how does it do compared to the full frame d810? Thank you.
I'm not sure why the D7000 is extremely noisy - what ISO are you using? Which lens and aperture? Which shutter speed? A larger sensor will do better in low light, but I suspect that there may be other solutions - settings, lenses, etc. which might improve your images - unless the venue is really dark, or your lens doesn't have a wide aperture, or your shutter speed is unnecessarily fast or your ISO is unnecessarily high? And I'm just asking/suggesting - potentially these are all issues that you've already tried to address.
***** no 6400 and a relatively fast shutter is definitely needed in a VERY low lit bar venue where musicians are running around on stage. So that's why the iso is so high and the pics are noisy.
Dear Maarten, can i ask a question please? Im stuck on deciding between two cameras d500 vs d750. Id like to get back into photography and am considering doing weddings. The d500 would enable me to do different types of jobs... like bands, wildlife, lectures 1. What id like to know is - is the D500 image quality sufficient for wedding needs? 2; Would i be able to use the D500 for an entire wedding? 3. Im considering Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED... Unless you can recommend a better one Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for such wonderful videos. Kieron UK *I like the d750 review, with the headers above the video like chapters
Thanks for the kind words - I'm glad you liked that interactive menu. 1) It is sufficient for wedding and other pro needs 2) Not sure - do you mean, if battery life long enough? (Probably, but get a backup anyway) 3) That's a fine lens, (one of the few DX lenses that are not ramped) you might also like a prime for portraits, and a longer zoom (-200mm) for subject that are further away.
Hi... many thanks for your reply. I can see from the other comments, you take great care of your channel, by responding. Thats wonderful. So the D500 it is then, and the nikkor lense, if this is going to be ok for taking wedding shots. I just dont want to fluff this up and make an incorrect choice. Is it ok to return to your channel and ask another question about flashes at some point? Also what got you interested in photography in the first place? just curious ... My girlfriend asked me this question and it reminded me of when i was young, getting old cameras from the jumble sale, the magical process of capturing light, then painting that light onto photopaper. That whole process is magical to me and still is. Unfortunately its expensive nowadays. All the best, kieron uk
Ask as many questions as you need. In my mind, photography is much less expensive than when I bought my first camera. But your attention to the question of wedding photographs make me wonder if there's something that I"m missing. What is the aspect of a camera purchase that you feel is specific to weddings and makes you feel that one or other camera might not be up to the task? I don't agree with the thought that photography is more expensive now. The costs of film and processing limited everyone's ability to experiment and learn. I think we all felt we were under a great deal more pressure then. I started in photography because my mother took photographs - mostly family snaps - and I liked the technology of the camera, and the processes involved. I like photography because there is so much in life that's fleeting and evanescent. Photography helps me both appreciate the moment and savour the memory. Taking the time to study and photograph a subject helps remind me of the joy that being a citizen on this planet can be.
Just got back from a walk in the woods... tree blossom, green, flowers, summers here lol www.dropbox.com/s/yecjcatc4kz2kz7/20170417_123642.jpg?dl=0 I used to do social, cruise ships, portraites etc. Ended up working for the MoD which gave me ptsd (trauma) so stayed away from photos for a long time, 20 yrs. The other reason was emulsion film and printing cost too much, due to circumstances. So i couldnt just go around and enjoy it. Also i remember the stress of doing 6 rolls of film on a job, hoping i got the exposures correct... i did enjoy the dev and colour printing part too Im now wanting to come back into life and looking to work again. Lots of debate saying the D750 is best camera for weddings because of its top quality.. (d810 is too expensive). Im thinking the D500 is just as good quality as a full frame with different lenses. The client at the end is unlikely to say "oh this d500 has more noise, why didnt you buy the d750 instead?!" would you agree? The D500 for me, will open up more avenues to make money by potentially doing stage work, night shots, nature, social... and maybe ill have to stand a little back from the subject doing wedding couples than i would with a full frame D750 Im currently researching lenses + speed lights. Thinking i would need a bounce head as a fill in flash when doing outside wedding couples, 28 to 50mm size lense and at least 2.8F to blur out the background. Also thinking maybe would i need a portable studio softbox flash system? (one i saw was a 2ft foldable softbox on a stand that you could poke a speedlight into) set that aside from the subject and maybe use secondary flash on the camera as -1stop fill in. I could use this too inside... is that a normal wedding shoot set up? Maybe even 2x either side to do group shots. Im considering the magbounce instead of the softbox, if it does the same job, it takes up less room. At the end of the day - im looking to come off benefits, back into life and dedicate myself to doing photo jobs which i would enjoy and would earn me enough to live off. Hence the reason for the weddings idea. Im going to do the website, etc. And test shoot maybe couple of willing models in weddings dress to get my portfolio up and also... it lets me take time over the shots to get used to it. anyway, thanks for the offer of the occational question, apprecaite it ~ all the best
Unless you're doing a lot of stressful low light night shooting without a flash and printing large images, I would not worry about the tradeoffs you're making with the D500 - that's a camera I really enjoyed. As for distance - standing back - that's really about your lens choice (unless you already have a bag full of FX lenses). I'm not a flash expert - I know video (continuous) lighting but not strobe. Sounds like you have a plan - it's nice to hear that your interest in photography is helping you recover from your work. Best wishes.
Can any eyeglass wearers comment on the eye relief? Specs say its only 16mm which would seemingly make it impossible to see the entire frame. Thanks for your review.
I'm looking at this in 2021 looking to buy this But also like canon 90d but ive heard that for canon to totally take advantage of the 32 MP it needs good high end glass or else the cuality wont show..... Is that true?
@@nachohernandez9491 The Nikon Z6. Whichever camera you choose, if you want quality, you'll need to purchase good lenses, otherwise you're wasting the money you spent on the larger sensor.
Hi Maarten. In your opinion is worth paying the extra $600-$700 for the D500 over the D7500? Lately I've taken the bird photography and I was looking for a better focus system over my D3400. Thanks
Apropos your comment re: AF Calibration, I followed a very simple (and successful for my lens) calibration video from Dave Flynn Photography's site. Worked a treat for my Tamron.
I don't know why people reviewing new camera's spend a ton of time going through menu's. Comparison between the previous flagship 7200 vs this 500 would have been more apt. Menu's are menu's and Nikon's menu's haven't changed in ages, but for some new menu items(features). How is the CCD? How is the low-light performance? How is the buffering? These are the things I would like to know in a new model.
Awesome and detailed video, as usual!!! Only a small nitpicking : at 0.24 sec. a text appears that says 18-80 mm kit, please correct it if possible!!!! overall excellent production!
Thanks for spotting that - I'll add an annotation to correct that. Always nice to know that my viewers are paying attention and catching my mis-steps. And thanks for the kind words.
Never mind!! You said it quite a few times in it that it is a 16-80 mm kit lens, and that should be enough!!! Just keep up the good work!! Among all the reviews out there in youtube-land i find yours to be the most balanced in terms of detail presentation and the fun factor!!!
I am sure it's a nice kit lens, it is not cheap for a kit lens, but if you want to experience the speed of the auto focus of this camera a faster lens does help, at the end of the day what matters most is the 12" behind the lens. I really enjoyed your review, very helpful indeed. I just bought this camera and using it with my Nikon DX 17-55f2.8 as my walk around lens, portrait lens and landscape, but will be looking into the new Tokina 10-20mmf2 for landscape, night scape and panoramic shooting.
Thanks for the kind words - certainly it's not the speediest to focus, and I suppose it drags down the camera's potential in that aspect. And thanks for the tips on other lens options.
Dear Cybertec69... thats interesting, im looking to get this lense too. Is it the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED one?? has this lense been good to you? good quality etc
Talk about a beast of a camera, pretty impressive. Although since I'm a Sony guy and use Sony gear I'll probably get an A7 in the future. But this camera is lovely.
It absolutely is lovely. Although I much prefer the idea of mirrorless cameras, the act of taking photographs is better with a DSLR, if that makes sense. It really was a joy to walk around Paris with it - and in the end, not as cumbersome as all that.
I too prefer mirrorless cameras, they're just so much better now and easily surpass a mirrored camera, the technology is pretty well developed now and it's easy to see why it replaced mirrored cameras.
You know what's an interesting little fact I learned about mirrors, they are actually slightly colored green, not colorless as many might perceive mirrors to be, both big and small. Which thinking about it explains why in an older mirrored camera there's always a bit of a loss with images. Not only due to minor imperfections in the mirror, but that slight bit of green may have played a role and no one knew.
It's not that the D500 isn't a superb camera, and if you'd like to lighten your wallet, I (and Nikon and your dealer) don't want to discourage you. But unless there's some very specific need you have, or problem you've encountered, I wouldn't. There are many ways to improve your photography without investing in more hardware - although maybe a lens is a good purchase depending on what you're shooting. I'd get very frustrated with a capability that the D3300 doesn't have (it's a very nice, capable camera) before I decided it was time to replace it so soon.
Maarten Heilbron Thanks. The reasons that I want to upgrade to either the D5500 or the D500 are Flat Picture Profile and more video capabilities for my video work, like a tilty or articulating screen. Or maybe I should get full-frame? I've been wanting to become an indie film-maker and I trust greatly in the Nikon lineup. So, should I get the D5500, the D500, or the D750? Those are the cameras in my price point... Also, great video. Your editing is superb and the quality blew me away.
More kind words! Thanks very much. I see the attraction for video ... but I would recommend that you consider a mirrorless camera if video is your goal. Remember that a DSLR needs to be in "mirrorless" mode to shoot video and as the functions of the camera are designed for stills, with the mirror down, things like focus are lesser in video mode. That said, I did find the D500 to be a better video performer than average for a DSLR.
Maarten Heilbron I see... A problem that I've noticed about mirrorless cameras is the poor battery life because of the always on sensor, so I'm not sure...
Very true, battery life tends to be terrible. I'm just finishing my review of the X-T2, but with a battery grip, it's a pretty serious video camera with great battery life. (I think It's because of the LCD and viewfinder screens, but I"m sure powering the sensor plays a role too.)
Canon's marketing team has somehow managed to convince you (and others) that dual pixel is a focus system. The rest of the camera manufacturers call it phase detect. Any camera that uses phase detect has "dual pixel auto focus". It's how phase detect works (read about it on Wikipedia).
Maarten Heilbron, thanks for the reply! I used to have a Olympus dslr and it’s just died and I want a better dslr I am choosing between Nikon d500 and canon 80d or 5d mark 5 which one do you prefer? Cause I knew Nikon has no AA filter you can can tell the detailed and canon has AA filter that makes blurry the outcome.
I personally like the D500. I'm not a pro, or shooting under the kinds of conditions that would warrant a 5Dm5. As for the AA filter, I'm not sure that most of us shoot the kinds of things that would enable one to see the difference between a camera that does and does not have an AA filter. Once the resolution is suitably large, an AA filter is no longer needed, and until recently all cameras had them.
As I've said before, you are truly one of the best camera reviewers out there! Absolutely wonderful job explaining the details of the D500. I currently shoot with a D750, and have considered getting a D500. Aside from the obvious difference of FX vs DX sensors, would you recommend getting a D500 to replace, or even just accompany, a D750?
It is very kind of you to comment with such kind words, and I do appreciate that. I'm not sure what you find lacking in the D750 - it's certainly a great camera, and I would not be in a hurry to replace it. If your D750 is lonely and needs a friend, I might think about a smaller travel camera - if you're a manual style photographer, have a look at Fuji (X-T70 or X-T100), otherwise, think about the Nikon 1 or Sony RX100 series.
Thanks for your recommendation. To be honest, the D750 is probably the best camera I've ever used and the only thing that I find lacking is not having 4K video. But I do like the idea of a smaller travel camera. I will be traveling to Paris in a few months, and really don't want to be carrying around a full size DSLR. I will definitely check out the Fuji cameras you recommended.
4K is a good reason to upgrade - but I'd recommend that unless the need for 4K is pressing that you delay as long as possible. 4K in and on its own will soon be complemented by extended dynamic range (not to confuse you, but it will be called HDR) and an expanded colour space. Some manufacturers have moved towards that specification (formally REC 2020) but none are fully there, and TV set or other display manufacturers are further behind. I'd wait for that technology to settle down, if possible, before buying. I'm posting an interview with Jem Schofield (thec47.com) on this topic later this week.
Maarten Heilbron do you have a old review/link on the Nikon D3x. I'm having one refurbished and would love to get your views if any on Street Photography usage. Thanks in advance.
Maybe it's me but I really hate Nikon's menu system. I really can't understand how so many people find it clear and simple and criticize the manufacturers' choices (Sony and Olympus in primis). I guess it's a matter of habit. After all I started shooting with Sony and I'm glad I did.
I think you've identified the issue - familiarity, but Sony's menu provides a great many more options than most and in some cases, these have not been consistently implemented or well categorized and organized.
Thanks for the answer. I basically agree with you as far as the menu complexity is concerned. Sony should really try to simplify things a bit more and to remove what is redundant like the double identification of some submenus with numbers and icons. What I meant was that the criticism I often hear about their menu system is way over-exaggerated and probably caused by the long habit of shooting with other brands. What I'd really like Sony to do anyway is implementing a full touch functionality in their next cameras and a menu system that really fits the touch mechanics. They already have the expertise of their mobile division, so I really hope they'll make the jump soon.
This is unequivocally the most well articulated review of the D500 I've seen. I already own the camera, but found myself watching this a couple times, learning things about the camera I had overlooked. Thank you.
I like "unequivocally"! Thank you for your kind and generous compliment, greatly appreciated. I'm so glad to hear you found the video useful.
I just found a New D500 in 2024, of course this was the first video I looked for. Thanks Again Maarten!
Always nice to hear that I’ve helped, thanks for commenting.
After moving to the d500 from a d5600 this video has been incredible. Thank you so much for the time and effort you put into this. Very much appreciated! You are a wonderful teacher sir!
I'm always pleased to read that my videos are useful and appreciated. Thanks for your kind words.
A wonderful, detailed, yet simple, tour of the camera and controls plus gorgeous images to accompany the video.
What a pleasure t read your kind words, thank you very much.
Maarten's videos are absolutely top drawer. As professional as they are entertaining, I love my d500, with the 200-500 it's a winning machine!
Glad you like them. I'll let Maarten know.
Best on RUclips. Such a pleasant and professional manner, these are very well-structured and thought out reviews.
I certainly appreciate the kind words, thanks for your comments.
i have owned this camera for 6 months now and still found this video very helpful. i did not know about f6 custom setting concerning release button and dial options, love it! thanks and great job!!
What a pleasure to read your kind comments - it's always nice to know that I've helped. Happy shooting.
Amazing job on these hands on videos. As I'm looking for a new camera now I really appreciate how comprehensive and detailed these are!
Thanks for posting those kind words, always nice to know that my videos are useful.
Having seen some of your previous reviews of the Nikon DX cameras, I expected a thorough and detailed treatment for the D500 as well. I was not disappointed. Well done and thank you!!
That is very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
This is best instructional video on use of any dslr camera I have learnt more here than any other thankyou please do more like this one
Thanks for your kind words. As I explained in a recent video, the opportunity to do these kinds of videos may no longer exist. ruclips.net/video/nf4quNLi2m4/видео.html
Congrats on the review. The best reviews on RUclips by far.
How nice of you to say, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Great review. Well produced and concise info presented.
It's a pleasure to read your kind comment, thank you.
Wow..... Now that's a tutorial that makes you want to go out and buy this camera straight away, even if you don't have a pilots licence or a degree in metaphysics..... Well I know which camera I will be buying soon and I will not have problems knowing how to use it because this video explains it in depth and easy to follow. Congratulations on this fantastic video
hehe, I appreciate the kind words.
This must have taken ages, excellent work. Despite being a Canon shooter I'm very tempted to get this for my wildlife work.
I try to take care to explore and explain all of the features and functions - so thank you for recognizing the time that takes. I'd be tempted too, but if you have an investment in Canon lenses, I'd also have a look at some recent Canon models - I'm still waiting for Canon Canada's 80D review unit to arrive ...
Fantastic review. This camera is now on my wish list. Love your very in depth information. Thank you.
Thank you very much for taking the time to post such a nice comment, greatly appreciated.
Did you get it?
I love your review. It is really interesting and I learnt new options that I wouldn't figure out without this video. I have the D500 and it's indeed a good choice. I will try them once I am back home on Montreal in February. Thanks for giving your precious time to learn people about photography. It is a great step in our time where the world is becoming more ignorant than ever.
my god.. Maarten you are the master of the d500.... I had to slow the video to .5 speed to soak up every technical nuance... Excellent Depth yet simple presentation!
Wow! Thanks so much for your very kind words, they are gratefully appreciated.
19:31 It's used in certain situations, like formatting your card, so you don't spaz out and accidentally format your card when you didn't want to. It's easy to just automatically hit the "ok" on the multi-selector on the right side of the camera back without thinking because of muscle memory, etc. Making you hit a button you rarely use for doing potentially catastrophic things (like formatting a card on accident and losing thousands of photos) is a good safeguard to have in place.
Understood. However, safeguarding for an accidental format - as most cameras do - doesn't require me to use an unusual button.
The way Nikon's menus are programmed it does. They don't have an "Are you SURE you want to..." dialog pop up. Which again, if it's on the same button, then muscle memory from constantly pressing the button could still result in an accident. It is better to make you stop and think and have to physically use a different button.
I appreciate your spirited defence, but do not agree. Thanks for your thoughts.
Hey, difference of opinion makes the world go around. We'll just have to agree to disagree, and there's nothing wrong with that. :) Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Take care.
Very helpful video, learnt much more in a few minutes of video than poring over the rather scant manual for ages.
I'm so glad to hear that you found my video useful - thanks for taking the time to comment.
Fabulous explanation on The D500 and wonderful views of Paris which we just visited less than a month ago! Stunning imagery!
What a pleasure to read your kind words, thanks for commenting.
Hi Maarten - I'm curious how far you would push the ISO when filming indoors to maintain good video quality (shooting in 4K)? I have a shoot coming up that will be in a conference room, using a three point light setup (talking head video). I'll be using a fixed 2.8 lens and will have it wide open, shutter 1/60. Thoughts?
Depending on how much light the fixtures provide, sounds like you should be fine without pushing ISO. In general, higher ISOs are less visible/noticeable in video. That said, my preference is always to increase the lighting over the ISO, as a good lighting setup always provides better definition.
I just wanted to say thank you so much for the incredibly informative and slick video, absolutely outstanding in every respect 👏🙏👍😊
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words.
Excellent video and very professionally done. It kept me focused (LOL). Others should watch you before they do videos. They always ramble and stray from the subject matter. I wind up either fast forwarding or just stopping the video. Another good RUclipsr is Olivia Speranza and the gentleman from The Camera Store videos.
hehe, thanks for the kind words, I so appreciate my viewers. Yes, those guys are also worth watching.
Merci Maarten !!... you made a fast by detailed presentation on this excellent Nikon which I just got for my active work.... belles photos de Paris !
Thank you for your kind words, mille fois merci.
Excellent, very detailed review! Love my D500, learned a lot. You move so quick, had to watch twice. Thanks!
:-) That's very kind of you to say. I do try to keep it snappy.
Very nice review. I am getting this camera this week and this review comes as very useful. Thank you for your time and research.
I appreciate the kind words, thanks very much.
Who’s watching this in 2024?
I've been wondering the same thing!
Just watched it and bookmarked it.
Best review on RUclips! Keep up the great work!
That is very kind of you to say, thanks.
Fantastic review, and some really lovely shots there.
A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks for commenting.
Incredible review!! The best so far! Thank you! Ill get this beast soon!!
Thanks for the kind words, appreciated.
Came across your video today. I was extremely pleased with you style. I'm now a subscriber. 😀👍
Thanks for taking the time to comment and to subscribe, I appreciate the kind words and the subscription.
Very impressive video review......shows that one does not have to be too opinionated to be a good reviewer. I'm subscribing to hear more from you. Keep up the good work :- )
Thank you for taking the time to comment, I very much appreciate your kind words.
Amazing review and great photos!
That's very kind, thanks for commenting, appreciated.
Very good review my compliments!!!! Great location for the review.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks. I wish I could shoot both in Paris and at the Paris RUclips space more often.
Very good review! As always, btw. Thanks for your time and care with your videos.
It's very kind of you to say - I appreciate your comment, thank you.
Great in-depth and understandable review as always.
As I said before to you I shall purchase this one day. Along with the Nikon D750, Fuji XT2, Panasonic GH4 and GH5 as well as Panasonic New Bridge Camera with 4K.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks. That's a very impressive shopping list, and sure to keep you busy for a long time. Enjoy! ;-)
+Maarten Heilbron Yes it is a good shopping list and I am sure in years to come it will be added to.
hehe
Excellent review, as always!
Always nice to hear from you, thanks for the kind words.
***** Thanks for your hard work! Gosh, you are travelling to Paris (for leisure, presumbly) and yet still have to 'work'. Then there is writing the script and editing them together into a cohesive and coherent piece. Not easy indeed.
Please don't call this "work". I get a great deal of enjoyment from learning about and thinking about cameras - as well as shooting and editing videos. Those activities have just become part of the routine - and I'm very lucky that Kim is also a happy assistant.
***** Happy for you, many people would consider this some great work. Perhaps I shall say ''labour of love' then. lol
Thanks.
Very detailed probably the best I have seen
That's very kind, thanks for commenting.
Woww...this is what we called detailed review, well done Sir!
Very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
EXCELLENT video and review... the best I have seen, since I have seen must all of them since my recent purchase. Congrats
It was a pleasure to read your kind words, thank you!
I learn more about my camera than any where else...no than you :-)
It's always my pleasure.
Omg I have a D7500 and I didn't know about that highlight weighted metering setting. Sounds super useful 👌 I'm always clipping highlights. Thanks!
Always nice to read that my videos are appreciated and helpful, thanks for the kind words.
Almost four years after this was posted to RUclips, this is still an interesting and informative video.
I am gathering my pennies towards buying a Nikon D500 with 16-80mm lens. I look forward to buying the camera. As your video shows, this is a very powerful tool for both stills and video.
Glad it was helpful! Always nice to hear that viewers appreciate my work.
Excellent, in depth review. Thank you.
That's very kind of you, thanks for taking the time to comment.
HI LOOKING FOR MY FIRST DSLR LOVE NIKON IM A MUSICIAN LOOKING FOR LOW LIGHT STILLS AND video 4k... waiting for new d760 or d620 full frame should I wait or buy d500????thx JOE
I'm sure they'll all be good choices - improve low light performance with good lenses - she of the best concert photos were taken in the days when cameras/film had very low ISOs - with ISOs usable at 6400 and over, these would all be fine.
THANK YOU SOO MUCH...JOE
Always happy to help.
Does anyone know what's the crop factor for a 16-80mm 2.8 on a D500 recording 4K?
EXCELLENT review. Unbiased and EXTREMELY comprehensive. Thank you Maarten.
Just one comment; people complain about Sony E mount menus... but compared to Canon the menu and control system for this camera is VERY complicated and non-intuitive.
That may be true, but long-time Nikon users feel that it's intuitive for them ...
An Excellent observation... and therein lies the key to understanding!!!
Canon user knows canon menus. Nikon users know Nikon... and Sony users know Sony. It's crossing over from one manufacturer to another that creates this issue and perception.
Again, THANKS for your EXCELLENT reviews... you are one of the best.
Thanks for your kind words, appreciated
Excellent review / tutorial.....the best I've seen. Just one small point.....the ISO setting mentioned @2.47 is actually 51,200, not 51.2 as you stated. I've used my D500 at this setting and the results are very good and below about ISO 30,000 they are excellent :-)
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words, and I'm sorry if you didn't understand my shorthand. But wait, you did!
HOLA. MUY BUENO. SALUDOS. UNA CONSULTA SABES QUE TIPO DE CABLE CONECTOR USA LA D 500. EL N1 O EL N3. GRACIAS.
Su bloqueo de mayúsculas está atascado. Con disculpas, no conozco esos cables ... ¿para qué se utilizan? ¿Ha comprobado con Nikon, o ha buscado con Google?
Excellent review.. thanks
Ordered D500, Subscribed as well.!!!
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words and the sub. I hope to live up to your expectations.
Amazingly well done tutorial. Thanks! Greetings from Brazil.
+Ricardo Barbosa Hello Brazil! Thanks for watching and for the kind words.
love this review! thank you Maarten.
Always my pleasure, thanks for the kind words.
I'm leaning toward the D500 for myself and the D7200 for my wife, what 3 or 4 lens do you recommend. Here is what we are thinking about Nikon zoom 17-55 f2.8 DX G ED, Nikon zoom 200-500 f5.6 ED AR, Nikon zoom 24-70 f2.8 G and the Tokina AT-X PRO D 100 f2.8 macro.
Sounds like a nice lean, and good choices. I'm not familiar with all of those lenses, but I do find that the Nikon lens recommendations made by wirecutter provide good advice.
Congratulations on the explanation, when someone really knows about photography is evident, I'm very tired of watching videos that do not explain anything and often add lies to the description, thank you
So nice to read your kind words, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Thanks for the review helps me make a decision. I am an enthusiast and I am stuck with making a call on full frame vs d500s
Thanks for the kind words, always nice to know I've been able to help.
Excellent review and instructions. One thing to fix though is text prior to the B&H link above specifies D5500.
Thanks, always nice to know that my viewers have my back! Fixed. And I do appreciate your kind words.
I broke my 70-300 mm AF S lens which I was told was no longer made and I could not find one so I faced the conundrum that the AF-P 70-300 mm lens was not compatible with my D300. I had waited a long time for its successor so decided to buy the D500 (finally!). Do you have any experience with the new AF-P series? My lens is the FX version not the less expensive DX version. I really appreciate your review of the D500.
I have used it to take bird photos with some superb results. I loved your extensive review. Thanks.
Oh dear. But I'm sure you're happy with the D500. The Af-P lenses are newer with "pulse" focus motors, which are faster and quieter. They generally abstract more of the control switches found on the lens to options in the camera menu. As you undoubtedly have already figured out, the FX lenses are of superior quality.
Thank you for your kind words, always appreciated.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks so much for the great review. I sometimes feel overwhelmed by Nikon's instruction manuals which are so long. I will watch your video a few times as it explains so much! The AF-P lens allows you to get about a foot closer (shorter focus distance than the AF-S). Perhaps because of that, the birds don't like the sound of the focus motor, which really is very quiet. The lens I broke was insured. The D300 survived the fall, the lens did not.
I have used the D500 for about 8 months and still have a lot to learn but am so glad I have it! I love both camera and lens. Thanks again. --loved your Paris photos, too!
I always enjoy Paris, it was great to shoot it with the D500, which was not nearly as cumbersome as I anticipated. Thanks again, I do appreciate reading kind words from my viewers.
Does the 16-80 really use focus-by-wire? Doesn't it have just a clutch mechanism just like all other AF-S lenses?
Thanks, I didn't realize that Nikon's hybrid system had a name.
I don't know about a specific name, I don't think this is specific to Nikon either, but the point is that "focus by wire" would mean that turning the ring engages a focus motor which in turn moves the focusing group. What is happening here instead is that the ring is mechanically moving the focusing group, but is disengaged while autofocus is working; in manual focus, when you reach either end of the travel of the focusing group, the ring is also disengaged (you can continue turning it, but it moves nothing).
I see, most lenses with an AF/MF clutch have to be manually switched from one to the other, so this is an interesting solution. I appreciate the clarification.
hi Maarten thanks for your video ,just i want to know about the best camera for quality pictures nikon or canon around 1700$ thanks a lot
There is no dramatic difference, some prefer one, some the other. Buying a great lens for either will make a bigger difference.
thank you so much
always my pleasure
Hey i have a Question I couldn’t find the secure Plastic clips for USB for D500 ?! Do you know where can i find that?!
Do you mean the HDMI clip that comes with the camera? Not sure where/how to replace that - maybe Nikon. Here's an alternative, which also works with other cameras and other types of connectors - bhpho.to/2Bpp9L7
Right now I currently have a d7000 and when photographing in low light my photos come out EXTREMELY noisy. Was looking at strictly full frame cameras (d810 mostly) for low light stuff (mostly very low light bar concerts). Will this camera do well enough to make me not regret getting the d810? I love a lot of the features the d500 has. But if I'm going to get less results in low light, I'd rather have the d810. But I have seem images where the d810 does WORSE in low light than the d500. I'm very confused. Sorry for the long post. Basically, what I'm really asking is, will the d500-even though it's still crop- do HIGHLY better than the d7000 in low low light and how does it do compared to the full frame d810? Thank you.
I'm not sure why the D7000 is extremely noisy - what ISO are you using? Which lens and aperture? Which shutter speed?
A larger sensor will do better in low light, but I suspect that there may be other solutions - settings, lenses, etc. which might improve your images - unless the venue is really dark, or your lens doesn't have a wide aperture, or your shutter speed is unnecessarily fast or your ISO is unnecessarily high? And I'm just asking/suggesting - potentially these are all issues that you've already tried to address.
Thanks for posting this very helpful comment.
***** no 6400 and a relatively fast shutter is definitely needed in a VERY low lit bar venue where musicians are running around on stage. So that's why the iso is so high and the pics are noisy.
Muy buen vídeo d la Nikon D500 , muy distinto a los tradicionales , ilustrativo y claro. Muchas gracias
Es muy amable de tu parte decirlo, gracias por comentar.
Sir, I appreciate very much your videos, you are such a detailed person, great explanations! thank you very much
That's very kind, thanks.
Great job on the review!
Thank you, I appreciate your kind words.
Hi Maarten does using the sensor VR in movie mode lose resolution on the 1080p
No, it is still 1920x1080, even with VR. Using VR does introduce a slight crop, but the sensor is so large that it doesn't affect image quality.
Very comprehensive. Thank you.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks!
Dear Maarten, can i ask a question please?
Im stuck on deciding between two cameras d500 vs d750. Id like to get back into photography and am considering doing weddings. The d500 would enable me to do different types of jobs... like bands, wildlife, lectures
1. What id like to know is - is the D500 image quality sufficient for wedding needs?
2; Would i be able to use the D500 for an entire wedding?
3. Im considering Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED... Unless you can recommend a better one
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for such wonderful videos. Kieron UK
*I like the d750 review, with the headers above the video like chapters
Thanks for the kind words - I'm glad you liked that interactive menu.
1) It is sufficient for wedding and other pro needs
2) Not sure - do you mean, if battery life long enough? (Probably, but get a backup anyway)
3) That's a fine lens, (one of the few DX lenses that are not ramped) you might also like a prime for portraits, and a longer zoom (-200mm) for subject that are further away.
Hi... many thanks for your reply. I can see from the other comments, you take great care of your channel, by responding. Thats wonderful.
So the D500 it is then, and the nikkor lense, if this is going to be ok for taking wedding shots. I just dont want to fluff this up and make an incorrect choice.
Is it ok to return to your channel and ask another question about flashes at some point?
Also what got you interested in photography in the first place? just curious ...
My girlfriend asked me this question and it reminded me of when i was young, getting old cameras from the jumble sale, the magical process of capturing light, then painting that light onto photopaper. That whole process is magical to me and still is. Unfortunately its expensive nowadays.
All the best, kieron uk
Ask as many questions as you need.
In my mind, photography is much less expensive than when I bought my first camera.
But your attention to the question of wedding photographs make me wonder if there's something that I"m missing. What is the aspect of a camera purchase that you feel is specific to weddings and makes you feel that one or other camera might not be up to the task?
I don't agree with the thought that photography is more expensive now. The costs of film and processing limited everyone's ability to experiment and learn. I think we all felt we were under a great deal more pressure then.
I started in photography because my mother took photographs - mostly family snaps - and I liked the technology of the camera, and the processes involved. I like photography because there is so much in life that's fleeting and evanescent. Photography helps me both appreciate the moment and savour the memory. Taking the time to study and photograph a subject helps remind me of the joy that being a citizen on this planet can be.
Just got back from a walk in the woods... tree blossom, green, flowers, summers here lol
www.dropbox.com/s/yecjcatc4kz2kz7/20170417_123642.jpg?dl=0
I used to do social, cruise ships, portraites etc. Ended up working for the MoD which gave me ptsd (trauma) so stayed away from photos for a long time, 20 yrs.
The other reason was emulsion film and printing cost too much, due to circumstances. So i couldnt just go around and enjoy it.
Also i remember the stress of doing 6 rolls of film on a job, hoping i got the exposures correct... i did enjoy the dev and colour printing part too
Im now wanting to come back into life and looking to work again. Lots of debate saying the D750 is best camera for weddings because of its top quality.. (d810 is too expensive). Im thinking the D500 is just as good quality as a full frame with different lenses. The client at the end is unlikely to say "oh this d500 has more noise, why didnt you buy the d750 instead?!" would you agree?
The D500 for me, will open up more avenues to make money by potentially doing stage work, night shots, nature, social... and maybe ill have to stand a little back from the subject doing wedding couples than i would with a full frame D750
Im currently researching lenses + speed lights. Thinking i would need a bounce head as a fill in flash when doing outside wedding couples, 28 to 50mm size lense and at least 2.8F to blur out the background.
Also thinking maybe would i need a portable studio softbox flash system? (one i saw was a 2ft foldable softbox on a stand that you could poke a speedlight into) set that aside from the subject and maybe use secondary flash on the camera as -1stop fill in. I could use this too inside... is that a normal wedding shoot set up?
Maybe even 2x either side to do group shots. Im considering the magbounce instead of the softbox, if it does the same job, it takes up less room.
At the end of the day - im looking to come off benefits, back into life and dedicate myself to doing photo jobs which i would enjoy and would earn me enough to live off. Hence the reason for the weddings idea.
Im going to do the website, etc. And test shoot maybe couple of willing models in weddings dress to get my portfolio up and also... it lets me take time over the shots to get used to it.
anyway, thanks for the offer of the occational question, apprecaite it ~ all the best
Unless you're doing a lot of stressful low light night shooting without a flash and printing large images, I would not worry about the tradeoffs you're making with the D500 - that's a camera I really enjoyed. As for distance - standing back - that's really about your lens choice (unless you already have a bag full of FX lenses).
I'm not a flash expert - I know video (continuous) lighting but not strobe. Sounds like you have a plan - it's nice to hear that your interest in photography is helping you recover from your work. Best wishes.
Can any eyeglass wearers comment on the eye relief? Specs say its only 16mm which would seemingly make it impossible to see the entire frame. Thanks for your review.
That's correct, it is difficult to see the whole frame, particularly the edges where the information displays are.
Hey Maarten thanks for the reply. That nixes the D500 for me.
Always happy to help
I'm looking at this in 2021 looking to buy this
But also like canon 90d but ive heard that for canon to totally take advantage of the 32 MP it needs good high end glass or else the cuality wont show.....
Is that true?
Quality....sorry.
That is true for both cameras.
@@MaartenHeilbron but what would You choose? It's for everyday camera only.
@@nachohernandez9491 The Nikon Z6. Whichever camera you choose, if you want quality, you'll need to purchase good lenses, otherwise you're wasting the money you spent on the larger sensor.
Dear Maarten do you think it is still worthy to buy this camera nowadays? Thanks in advance.
While it depends on your level of expertise, your expectations and your needs, yes, I feel it's still a very worth model.
Where can I buy the D500 LCD view finder sun shield you mentioned?
My apologies, I though it was in the description:
The viewfinder adapter: amzn.to/2Chbawu
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you.
Hi Maarten. In your opinion is worth paying the extra $600-$700 for the D500 over the D7500? Lately I've taken the bird photography and I was looking for a better focus system over my D3400. Thanks
If you are looking for an improved focus system, consider the Z6 (or Z7), which are really superior.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks
Great video but i came to find out more about the Retouch Menu.....oh well....
It's pretty easy and non-destructive. Explore! Try! You have nothing to lose.
Apropos your comment re: AF Calibration, I followed a very simple (and successful for my lens) calibration video from Dave Flynn Photography's site. Worked a treat for my Tamron.
Thanks for sharing that tip. Always nice to hear from someone with the right experience.
As said by other, great review and concise info presented
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
I don't know why people reviewing new camera's spend a ton of time going through menu's. Comparison between the previous flagship 7200 vs this 500 would have been more apt. Menu's are menu's and Nikon's menu's haven't changed in ages, but for some new menu items(features). How is the CCD? How is the low-light performance? How is the buffering? These are the things I would like to know in a new model.
Good point, I'll do better to address those issues in upcoming reviews.
Very nice, is very simple to understand. Thanks :D
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words.
How do u know if it's a D I see nothing do then I have mo touch screen
I'm sorry, I don't understand the question. What's a "D"?
Awesome and detailed video, as usual!!! Only a small nitpicking : at 0.24 sec. a text appears that says 18-80 mm kit, please correct it if possible!!!!
overall excellent production!
Thanks for spotting that - I'll add an annotation to correct that. Always nice to know that my viewers are paying attention and catching my mis-steps. And thanks for the kind words.
I've tried to create the annotation, but somehow they're disabled for this video?
Never mind!! You said it quite a few times in it that it is a 16-80 mm kit lens, and that should be enough!!!
Just keep up the good work!! Among all the reviews out there in youtube-land i find yours to be the most balanced in terms of detail presentation and the fun factor!!!
Thanks for the kind words, always appreciated. I like "fun factor", thanks for that.
I am sure it's a nice kit lens, it is not cheap for a kit lens, but if you want to experience the speed of the auto focus of this camera a faster lens does help, at the end of the day what matters most is the 12" behind the lens. I really enjoyed your review, very helpful indeed. I just bought this camera and using it with my Nikon DX 17-55f2.8 as my walk around lens, portrait lens and landscape, but will be looking into the new Tokina 10-20mmf2 for landscape, night scape and panoramic shooting.
Thanks for the kind words - certainly it's not the speediest to focus, and I suppose it drags down the camera's potential in that aspect. And thanks for the tips on other lens options.
Dear Cybertec69... thats interesting, im looking to get this lense too. Is it the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED one?? has this lense been good to you? good quality etc
fantastic review and manual in one....Thankyou!
That's very kind, thanks for commenting.
Talk about a beast of a camera, pretty impressive. Although since I'm a Sony guy and use Sony gear I'll probably get an A7 in the future. But this camera is lovely.
It absolutely is lovely. Although I much prefer the idea of mirrorless cameras, the act of taking photographs is better with a DSLR, if that makes sense. It really was a joy to walk around Paris with it - and in the end, not as cumbersome as all that.
I too prefer mirrorless cameras, they're just so much better now and easily surpass a mirrored camera, the technology is pretty well developed now and it's easy to see why it replaced mirrored cameras.
That's true, from a technology perspective, the mirrorless camera marketplace is much more exciting.
You know what's an interesting little fact I learned about mirrors, they are actually slightly colored green, not colorless as many might perceive mirrors to be, both big and small.
Which thinking about it explains why in an older mirrored camera there's always a bit of a loss with images. Not only due to minor imperfections in the mirror, but that slight bit of green may have played a role and no one knew.
An interesting note and observation - thanks for this.
That was a great review. Thanks.
How kind of you to say, thanks very much.
Owned for a year now, hands down best aps-c made!
Thanks for adding your note - always nice to hear from a photographer with extended hands-on experience.
Should I upgrade from the Nikon D3300 to this or the D5500?
It's not that the D500 isn't a superb camera, and if you'd like to lighten your wallet, I (and Nikon and your dealer) don't want to discourage you. But unless there's some very specific need you have, or problem you've encountered, I wouldn't. There are many ways to improve your photography without investing in more hardware - although maybe a lens is a good purchase depending on what you're shooting.
I'd get very frustrated with a capability that the D3300 doesn't have (it's a very nice, capable camera) before I decided it was time to replace it so soon.
Maarten Heilbron Thanks. The reasons that I want to upgrade to either the D5500 or the D500 are Flat Picture Profile and more video capabilities for my video work, like a tilty or articulating screen. Or maybe I should get full-frame? I've been wanting to become an indie film-maker and I trust greatly in the Nikon lineup. So, should I get the D5500, the D500, or the D750? Those are the cameras in my price point... Also, great video. Your editing is superb and the quality blew me away.
More kind words! Thanks very much. I see the attraction for video ... but I would recommend that you consider a mirrorless camera if video is your goal. Remember that a DSLR needs to be in "mirrorless" mode to shoot video and as the functions of the camera are designed for stills, with the mirror down, things like focus are lesser in video mode. That said, I did find the D500 to be a better video performer than average for a DSLR.
Maarten Heilbron I see... A problem that I've noticed about mirrorless cameras is the poor battery life because of the always on sensor, so I'm not sure...
Very true, battery life tends to be terrible. I'm just finishing my review of the X-T2, but with a battery grip, it's a pretty serious video camera with great battery life. (I think It's because of the LCD and viewfinder screens, but I"m sure powering the sensor plays a role too.)
Can I use a Sony QXD card for D500?
Yes. Is there something I'm not aware of?
You are Veteran! love your videos, do you prefer this on FX body's? I'm a wedding photographer, D2x and D700 owner, thanks!
Thanks for your kind words. Although they can be pricey, in general my preference is always for a larger FX sensor.
Merci for the review!
De rien, always my pleasure.
It has dual pixel auto focus feature?
Canon's marketing team has somehow managed to convince you (and others) that dual pixel is a focus system. The rest of the camera manufacturers call it phase detect. Any camera that uses phase detect has "dual pixel auto focus". It's how phase detect works (read about it on Wikipedia).
Maarten Heilbron, thanks for the reply! I used to have a Olympus dslr and it’s just died and I want a better dslr I am choosing between Nikon d500 and canon 80d or 5d mark 5 which one do you prefer? Cause I knew Nikon has no AA filter you can can tell the detailed and canon has AA filter that makes blurry the outcome.
I personally like the D500. I'm not a pro, or shooting under the kinds of conditions that would warrant a 5Dm5. As for the AA filter, I'm not sure that most of us shoot the kinds of things that would enable one to see the difference between a camera that does and does not have an AA filter. Once the resolution is suitably large, an AA filter is no longer needed, and until recently all cameras had them.
Im tempted to buy one
I get that. I'm tempted too.
do you recommend buying the kit lens?
+MrSincityhustler I have no issues with the kit lens, however if you can afford to buy a better one, do.
Best I have seen
Thank you for your very kind words, appreciated.
Gosh, watching this made me want to buy it instead of an XT3, it is just a tad cheaper. But the video features are keeping me from doing so.
Right, not an ideal choice for video unless you only shoot video occasionally.
As I've said before, you are truly one of the best camera reviewers out there! Absolutely wonderful job explaining the details of the D500. I currently shoot with a D750, and have considered getting a D500. Aside from the obvious difference of FX vs DX sensors, would you recommend getting a D500 to replace, or even just accompany, a D750?
It is very kind of you to comment with such kind words, and I do appreciate that. I'm not sure what you find lacking in the D750 - it's certainly a great camera, and I would not be in a hurry to replace it. If your D750 is lonely and needs a friend, I might think about a smaller travel camera - if you're a manual style photographer, have a look at Fuji (X-T70 or X-T100), otherwise, think about the Nikon 1 or Sony RX100 series.
Thanks for your recommendation. To be honest, the D750 is probably the best camera I've ever used and the only thing that I find lacking is not having 4K video. But I do like the idea of a smaller travel camera. I will be traveling to Paris in a few months, and really don't want to be carrying around a full size DSLR. I will definitely check out the Fuji cameras you recommended.
4K is a good reason to upgrade - but I'd recommend that unless the need for 4K is pressing that you delay as long as possible. 4K in and on its own will soon be complemented by extended dynamic range (not to confuse you, but it will be called HDR) and an expanded colour space. Some manufacturers have moved towards that specification (formally REC 2020) but none are fully there, and TV set or other display manufacturers are further behind. I'd wait for that technology to settle down, if possible, before buying.
I'm posting an interview with Jem Schofield (thec47.com) on this topic later this week.
boy that is one fantastic camera. Wish I had one.
that makes at least two of us
Thanks A Lot.
Always my pleasure, thanks for commenting.
Super présentation 👏👏👏... Il me reste plus qu'apprendre l'anglais 😀
Merci pour ces mots gentils. Je souhaite que mon français soit meilleur, afin que je puisse enregistrer mes critiques en français aussi.
you my Sir, are the best... it's that's simple
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
Maarten Heilbron do you have a old review/link on the Nikon D3x. I'm having one refurbished and would love to get your views if any on Street Photography usage. Thanks in advance.
Sorry, before my time.
Dank U wel! Merci! Thanks!
AUB. Always my pleasure, I appreciate the kind words.
Très bien fait. Merci. Je préfère Sony mais c'est un très bon appareil.
D'accord, et merci beaucoup pour votre gentil commentaire. C'est bien apprécié.
Maybe it's me but I really hate Nikon's menu system. I really can't understand how so many people find it clear and simple and criticize the manufacturers' choices (Sony and Olympus in primis). I guess it's a matter of habit. After all I started shooting with Sony and I'm glad I did.
I think you've identified the issue - familiarity, but Sony's menu provides a great many more options than most and in some cases, these have not been consistently implemented or well categorized and organized.
Thanks for the answer. I basically agree with you as far as the menu complexity is concerned. Sony should really try to simplify things a bit more and to remove what is redundant like the double identification of some submenus with numbers and icons. What I meant was that the criticism I often hear about their menu system is way over-exaggerated and probably caused by the long habit of shooting with other brands. What I'd really like Sony to do anyway is implementing a full touch functionality in their next cameras and a menu system that really fits the touch mechanics. They already have the expertise of their mobile division, so I really hope they'll make the jump soon.
Touch? I'm hoping that they go directly to voice navigation - you're right, they have so much expertise it would be great if they would leverage it.