I had a Tamron super zoom in the past and found it very good. I now have the Nikon 28 - 400 z mount and find it equally as good. The "pros" don't like them as they think everyone should use prime lenses. I don't have any such hangups.
When I'm out hiking, 28-300 would give me everything I need in one lens. Currently I use a 24-105 backed up with a 70-300. This would save weight and changing in the wild - win, win!
I have the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 for my Fuji X-S20. Great travel lens and fairly decent for occasional wildlife. Can’t really complain about the IQ at all. Just wish the lens OIS worked better with Fuji IBIS and that Fuji’s AF worked better. Tamron kills it in this segment
Excellent review. I bought the original 28-300 back in 2006 and it got me a lot of great pictures. I believe you used the term higher apertures twice but with opposite meanings
Let's be honest this lens plus topaz ai will be more than enough for 95% of users. When i look at many images online...I think it would be good enough too.😊
because we grabbed the wrong lens when we took the thumbnail. I am technically holding the 50-300 lens by accident and we already sent back the 28-300. So I had to improvise.
I had a Tamron super zoom in the past and found it very good. I now have the
Nikon 28 - 400 z mount and find it equally as good. The "pros" don't like them
as they think everyone should use prime lenses. I don't have any such hangups.
personally I love this type of lens
once you understand how these work they're alot of fun
I LOVE my Nikon 28-300 f/3,5-5,6. Very underrated imo.
When I'm out hiking, 28-300 would give me everything I need in one lens. Currently I use a 24-105 backed up with a 70-300. This would save weight and changing in the wild - win, win!
was just looking at the older Tamron 28-300 EF for my own "one lens to rule them all"
reminds me of my first non-kit lens the Sigma 18-250
This would be a great addition if it could be linked to the Canon Rf 28-300 which would be 45- 480 equivalent cover my needs when out walking.
You seriously blurred out the aperture markings from the thumbnail?? SERIOUSLY??
I have the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 for my Fuji X-S20. Great travel lens and fairly decent for occasional wildlife. Can’t really complain about the IQ at all. Just wish the lens OIS worked better with Fuji IBIS and that Fuji’s AF worked better. Tamron kills it in this segment
Interesting, I was about to purchase the Nikon 28-400mm
I don't even have a Mirrorless Camera yet, the Z6ii is on sale.
Hmm, good carry around lens like the Nikon Z 28-400
don't listen Jared, if you aint earning like 100k on photography, then respect your money and buy that filter.
Excellent review. I bought the original 28-300 back in 2006 and it got me a lot of great pictures. I believe you used the term higher apertures twice but with opposite meanings
As someone with chronic lower back issues, I can’t watch field hockey without cringing.
Let's be honest this lens plus topaz ai will be more than enough for 95% of users. When i look at many images online...I think it would be good enough too.😊
Screw topaz
I’m getting a lot of elitism vibes from this video. 😂
What, reality?
Never heard the a7IV referred to as "lower end" but I guess it is compared to the a1 lol
@evans9748 Hes a rich snob, who could have a bar of gold in his hand and complain that it's not 3 bars
Why blur the aperture on the thumbnail?
because we grabbed the wrong lens when we took the thumbnail. I am technically holding the 50-300 lens by accident and we already sent back the 28-300. So I had to improvise.
@@froknowsphoto got to make due! Thanks for the answer!
Second
I will never shoot raw but I agree!😉
Canon color science 😌.
CAN⭕N EF28-300/3.5-5.6 is 🙌✌️💪
First