Lakon TYPE-8 Video Breakdown - What we know | Elite Dangerous News

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
  • Check out the latest details on the Lakon Type 8, the newest ship in Elite Dangerous. Get all the information you need in this video!
    More specification details of the Lakon Type-8 have been revealed on stream for Arthur's notes - here they are
    // This Video :
    ➤Link: • Lakon TYPE-8 Video Bre...
    And a bit of Discord too
    / discord
    And my other non ELite Dangerous Channel
    / @ricardosrtsgaming
    Channel Guidelines
    Be kind, considerate & respectful to all. Happy, helpful & respectful people
    1. Be kind, civil & respectful to all & English only in chat & comments
    2. No constant back seating, spamming, copy-pasting, or all-caps
    3. Read the title, description & review thumbnail for details
    // WAYS TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
    ************************************
    ✔️LIKE THE VIDEO
    ✔️SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL
    ✔️WATCHING THE STREAM
    // Affiliate Links:
    ***************
    Music by: migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
    Miguel Johnson
    Born in 1980 in Chicago, IL. Miguel Johnson has been a self-taught student of music since he was in middle school. Starting off as an MC in the Bay Area, and now heavily focused on more orchestral styles, he is focused on making a name for himself in the TV/film/video game industry.
    **********************************************
    @RicardosGaming #lakon #elitedangerous #elitedangerousnews
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 24

  • @Powerhauz
    @Powerhauz 16 дней назад +2

    Just theory crafting for a second. 406T max, 404T w/planetary(most likely as C1 slot gets locked out), 388 w/Shield and planetary. Beats Python, Clipper, T7, and Beluga. In terms of Cost, Your looking at a range of 22Mil-78Mil possibly. I would hedge bets on the side of the 40Mil plus. Math is (ship cost / ship max cargo X 406) using the T7, Python and T9 respectively. 5x1 HPs w/ a C4 distro is within the ASPX ability. This should act as a step up from the ASPX for mining in that regard. Jump range will probably be anywhere from 20-25LY before engineering, 40-45LY one jump max with 350/400T hull weight. Overall not bad. Idk where it fits it all, but cool I guess.

  • @mandiworld
    @mandiworld 17 дней назад +6

    It would be interesting to see those floodlights on a dark planet surface.

  • @TalonAvex
    @TalonAvex 16 дней назад +2

    So, I'm doing a lot of ground-based missions (mainly base restarts in ex-Thargoid areas). I have a couple of ships set up for ground assault missions to clear out pirates and scavengers before going in on foot or SRV. The Type 8 is looking like a strong candidate for this roll. In a couple of the class one weapon slots, I can install missiles and in the class two weapons slot, I can put a Remote Release Flechette Launcher. Both weapons are very effective for cleaning out the riff-raff. :)
    In the other class one slots, I can put in normal ship weapons (lasers and MC's) for general defense. The one thing that I wish it had was a fighter bay. I use the fighters for additional defense against ships or to scout bases. Since the Keelback, Type 9's and 10's have fighter bays, it would make some sense to have fighters...but I'm not holding my breath.

  • @EndersVRcade
    @EndersVRcade 16 дней назад +2

    That was an excellent breakdown, thank you!

  • @johnterpack3940
    @johnterpack3940 17 дней назад +4

    I don't know what to think about this boat yet. It kind of looks like they did the Clipper dirty. I mean, they made the Clipper oversize so it wouldn't fit on medium pads. Which makes it a very niche ship, large pads, small cargo. Meanwhile, the T-8 they give shrinking nacelles so it can use medium pads while carrying as much cargo as an Anaconda. If the T-8 is also cold, the Clipper has almost no advantage left... other than speed and maneuverability. I want to see how it flies. I could use a good medium hauler. As is, I do without simply because my Clipper and Cutter have me spoiled for how a ship should fly. If this thing could be engineered a bit to perform properly, I'd find a home for it.

    • @SWIFTO_SCYTHE
      @SWIFTO_SCYTHE 13 дней назад +1

      They made the Clipper and Type7 large for no reason.

    • @johnterpack3940
      @johnterpack3940 12 дней назад +1

      @@SWIFTO_SCYTHE So people wouldn't cry about them being OP for medium.

  • @Danko05
    @Danko05 13 дней назад +1

    Having a new combat ship, now a freighter with this one, the other two coming ships could be a miner a explorer maybe...

  • @mrbrunoguy12
    @mrbrunoguy12 17 дней назад +1

    That slot right about the cockpit looks like a hard point which would kind of match the typical Lakon ships builds. It would have been nice to at least have 1X3 1x2 and 4x1 hard points. Leave it to frontier to leave us wanting more

  • @Kaldortangerine
    @Kaldortangerine 14 дней назад +1

    i genuinely am disappointed that they didn't put guns on at least the under slung part of the arms,

  • @ShinigamiAnger
    @ShinigamiAnger 16 дней назад +2

    Can't wait for Star Citizen to copy the layout and make an actual use of the design.

  • @Tamburello_1994
    @Tamburello_1994 16 дней назад +1

    ....And this is just the second of four releases? (at minimum) They done real good here. One wonders what's being cooked up now since Type 8 is due for release...
    Of course everyone will have it, there is no doubt in my mind. I know I'll be giving mine a vigorous workout.

  • @phil__1097
    @phil__1097 16 дней назад +1

    Wow just 401 ton cargo space my t9 can carry 725 tons and my cargo cutter can carry 688 tons! But 401 tons sounds good for these small stations they pay really good. This ship is much better cargo space then the Python which I believe may has a total of 212 ton capacity! I wonder what it’s jump rage is when it’s full of cargo?

    • @RicardosGaming
      @RicardosGaming  16 дней назад

      @@phil__1097 class 5, unengineered, a rated standard fsd probably around 27

  • @evilsteve8915
    @evilsteve8915 14 дней назад +1

    I'd be interested to see if it can or will replace my python as my main bgs ship. (Probably not...)

  • @davewright8206
    @davewright8206 16 дней назад +1

    so if you like shields 340 cargo weapon slots hat are not worth filling

  • @phil__1097
    @phil__1097 16 дней назад +1

    I’m going to name my ship uss TONKA ship 😂😂😂 I remember when I was kid the best toys ever made was TONKA toys! And all of the toy’s where color yellow!

  • @blogtwot
    @blogtwot 17 дней назад +1

    I presume that as a partner you will get a chance to play with it early before the release like you did with the python and the other pre-builds?

  • @JadedEvild0er
    @JadedEvild0er 16 дней назад +2

    Conspiracy hat put on here. Everyone is paying attention to the ship but what about that "settlement" it was landed at. It seemed really minimal. I'm not sure I've seen a settlement that minimal on a planet. This was either a manufactured location to show off the ship or could this possibly also be a "reveal" of the base building component. Did they base build a location in game just to show this ship off. Are we scrutinizing the ship when a bigger reveal is missed...

    • @RicardosGaming
      @RicardosGaming  16 дней назад

      @@JadedEvild0er yeah I was thinking tnat

  • @thememery767
    @thememery767 17 дней назад +2

    it needs more detail it looks like a roblox plane crazy build