SA-2 SAM system explained in detail (Soviet name S-75)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- The 6th chapter in our educational series on evolution of war and warfare tech - War transformed - is live here: share.graphyapp.co/MHNG Accessible through the Graphy app. (subscription streaming service) The chapter covers the period of two world wars.
This video goes very much in depth on history of development and technical characteristics of the S-75 and SA-75 SAM system families. As well as the deployment and utilization experiences of Vietnam. Video was written and mostly animated by our guest author Balázs Molnár.
Do check out his previous video on S-25 here: • Was S-25, Soviet first...
Some of the materials used for the making of this video:
Operation Linebacker II
• Operation Linebacker I...
Russian original docs
historykpvo.narod2.ru/
historykpvo-2.ucoz.ru/
historykpvo-2.ucoz.ru/index/0-6
Other Russian documents
pvo.guns.ru/s75/s75.htm
SAMsim docs + the simulator
sites.google.com/site/samsimu...
SAMsim, how to play
• HOW TO PLAY: SAM Simul...
SAMsim gameplay
• SAM Simulator S-75 Dvi...
Cancelled projects
simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...
fielded#Post4236786
simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...
www.valka.cz/topic/view/79050
This is S-75 Volhov but it is almost identical with Dvina.
• How to prepare a HQ-2 ...
Many times the S-75 Volkhov are displayed but the interior and screens are close to identical with Dvina
• S-75 SAM SYSTEM MADE I...
Missile trailer walkaround
• S-75 Dvina (Russian: C...
Missile reload, UA cabin interior, ramparts, P-12 radar
• Misiles SA-2 "Guidelin...
Guidance on pro level, equations
• SAM S-75. Methods of ...
⏰Timestamps:
0:00 Channel Intro
0:25 SA-75 intro and foreword
1:32 Historical background & origin of the system
3:19 Export of the SA-75 Dvina, debut in Cold War conflicts
5:10 Conception, design basis of the SA-75 Dvina
6:11 The SNR-75 guidance station
8:02 Guidance modes and methods (leading)
11:54 Export to Vietnam, the SA-2F upgrade
12:54 Target acquisition and radars
15:35 The V-750 missile family
17:50 Steps of the engagement
18:21 The engagement zone
20:11 SA-75M (SA-2B/F) battery layout, composition
21:18 Target channel density comparison with the S-25 Berkut
21:49 Combat performance - Vietnam 1965-1972
28:25 Conclusions
Images used in the thumbnail:
B-52 by US Air Force, Public Domain
SA-2 firing (altered image) by Petrică Mihalache, CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
Once again thanks to our special guest Balázs Molnár for this detailed analysis!
@LAI ZHENG YI Moe Using publicly available data you can't make a real comparison. Only a very few things can be compared but if the missiles are not in the same class it would be orange vs apple.
Make a USA invasion of India video
Only 200 aircraft? Are you serious ? Perhaps you wanted to say 200 planes in the first month?
In total, the Americans lost 4,100 aircraft and 5,100 helicopters in Vietnam (their data), from August 1964 to January 1973, i.e. about 3 aircraft per day!
In addition, one must take into account the losses of the US allies (they NEVER fight alone outside the American continent!) And the losses of South Vietnamese aviation - in 1973, it was the 4th largest in the world (after the USA, USSR and China) and numbered 2.000 aircraft - this is at its peak, and deliveries went before and after, making up for the losses. And almost all of them were lost (with the exception of those who managed to fly to Thailand before the fall). Therefore, the total number of losses of Western aviation in Vietnam in 1964-75 is approx. 13,000 aircraft and helicopters.
With the help of the C - 75, 1293 aircraft were shot down, including 54 B-52 bombers.
Don't look at US data. They are not accurate. Simple example -
According to American data, the North Vietnamese launched more than 9000 missiles (despite the fact that only 7658 of them were delivered)
@@rerbitd7094 I have no time such kind of bullshit. I gave sources to the video. If you can't believe or thrust them I can't help.
Even to the last serial numbers are available about the lost of US. You can't shot down so many planes which did not even exist.
@@molnibalage83 I added clarification. Read my comment again. The US claim of 200 aircraft is a lie.
My grandpa actually served as a consulting officer teaching the Vietnamese operating S75 during the war in Vietnam
Where's ur mamma from
@@ammofalafel7980 why?
@@sleeping_beauty322 just intrested since it had to be one of the countrys that where allies whith north Vietnam and probably Soviet
@@ammofalafel7980 my grandpa, my grandma and both my parents all were from Soviet Union
Was your grandfather a truck driver? I once spoke with someone with a similar story.
Very in-depth on the complexities of the SAM systems. Excellent work, comrade Binkov!
I'm a bit sad that almost nobody noticed that not Binkov but a guest author made the video. (Me.) Is the totally different visual not a clear sign? :)
@@molnibalage83 Oh my, no, I didn't notice. My apologies. It is an excellent work. Very well done. This is the kind of video I like to watch with solid technical information and explanation. Thank you.
@@molnibalage83 Great work man! I noticed different style, more serious I would say. But you know, we are used to high standard here, and with the abundance of information we are just glad that the graphic is a good illustration for the topic and all the knowledge.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
This is what I call an excellent video. Details like the engagement protocoll are often missing in many documentaries but they are at the essence of the weapon feasibility.
Sadly there is not a single publicly available video about the process with good camera angles.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
One thing missed out is that the American air crews mutinied because of the SAMs. They refused to fly. Interesting, eh?
@@johnrichmond.4783 During Lin II? Mutiny is a strong word but yes, the morale was quite low after day 3.
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft They refused to fly = mutiny I'm afraid.
Very enlightening! As a co-op engineering student I worked at a S-band SAM-2 work-alike radar that the USAF had at Eglin AFB. Watching this brought back many memories.
The following episode will be available on Militavia channel soon.
Here.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
It’s 2021 and I’m learning about military systems from a puppet on RUclips..... maybe this isn’t the worst timeline after all.
In the 1950s😂😂
Just listen to what you've said... It is
As long as you wouldn't have to use that knowledge before the end of the year...
Laughed out loud at this 😂
The port of Hai Phong was mined, but it was not closed. Also, S125 was transported to VN via rail through China, but the Chinese delayed it in order to give the US an advantage. The Chinese had (quietly) switched to the US side by the early 1970. This is what is acknowledged in VN.
But really well animated. I like the presentation. It doesn't feel dry like an usual powerpoint.
@@Krasnoye158 Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
This is one of the best videos or the best video you ever made! I really enjoyed diving into the technical details. I suggest making such technical details for soviet and american anti armor guided missiles, that would be a great subject to cover! Keep the great work going General Binkov ;)
Not Binkov made the video, it was me. Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Thank you Balázs Molnár and Binkov for this great video. I really enjoy it. Hope you two work together more often and provide us with such quality content.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
I was part of a company with this system, and can tell you this video is on point. Cuban army mounted everything on T-55 and t-62 chasis making the system mobile and combat ready in 3min, if nothing breaks during transport.
These are actually my favorite videos explaining technology and tactics.
"Sorry, didn't know it was invisible."
That’s not this system. That was S-125.
@@scudb5509 Yes, and this "quote" is very boring...
Sooner or later the series will arrive that case.
@novichock tea Not much of fairytale. Considering I have a peace of that plane.
@novichock tea My mom ain’t Serb. But, I hope you enjoy what ever you got there. ❤️
Sorry but we deal serbia 150 bilion usd damages abd sand bact to med evil
As an electronics and communication engineering student , I really love when binkov taks about radars and SAM systems.
Really love your work! Keep it up👍
Also would like if you made some videos on some Indian military content. Especially on 1971 indo pak wars and the improvisation made by the Indian navy
I'm a bit sad that almost nobody noticed that not Binkov but a guest author made the video. (Me.)
@@molnibalage83 I'm so sorry! You also did a fabulous job❤️ keep up the good work ❤️🔥
Yes, finally, you made a video so related to Vietnam.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
The majority of B-52s and other types of aircrafts lost in Vietnam were due to the Soviet S-75 Dvina missiles systems manned by Soviet and North Vietnamese personnel who were trained by Soviet military advisers. It has become the hero missile that defeated the US "invincible" B-52s.
Tên lửa Sam2 không bắn tới máy bay B52. 1 kỹ sư người Việt Nam đã nâng cấp, tăng thêm lượng thuốc nổ. Kết quả là tầm bắn của Sam2 đã được cải thiện, và nó đã bắn rơi B52 của Hoa Kỳ
Binkov Ur so cute! I have a t-shirt and teddy of you!
For those who want to learn in detail about the history of Russian SAMs, watch a documentary called: “Protecting the Skies of the Motherland” or Защищая Небо Родины.
Unfortunately I only know the Russian versions. But, if you can find English ones be sure to let me know.
I found an English version of it on RUclips, here ruclips.net/video/dQw4w9WgXcQ/видео.html
@@crankthetank3581 ha ur tricks dont fool me I memorised all of em hahahhaaha
@@evilestwheat8266 is that a rickroll?
@@evilestwheat8266 the fact that you know what this is means you clicked on the link
@@rinharter7758 yes
There is a series about how we Vietnamese manage to defend against American B-52 on Vietnamese TV program, of which in this video have shown it in depth, great and educational video!
This old Soviet System ( SA-2E) was manage to shot down a F-14 Tomcat, 1 Tornado and 1 F-15E...during desert storm operation 1991...in spite of that many SEAD planes were flying over Iraq...
Not exactly. The SA-2E is the Volkhov not the Dvina. The Volkhov had much more ant-jam capabilities and missiles with slightly better turning capabilities.
@@molnibalage83 But it is a old and outdated SAM system!
@@rhodium1096 Was partially outdated, the export of the S-300 has not been started in 1990. Even the WPACT countries got a very few S-300PMU.
The next. gen air defense was not available. In fact the 2K22M and the Tor-M1 also were post Cold War systems.
@@molnibalage83 egy kitelepult radarallomasnak van/volt vmi vedelme az ellen, hogy pl 1-200db rairanyitott fold-fold, levego-fold vagy cirkalot raketat vhogy lekezeljen a sajat maga vedelmeben?
vagy akkor csak a szegyen a futas, de hasznos cimu tortenet az egyetlen megoldas? :)
@@hobizoli Akkor nem létezett cirkáló rakéta. Az irányított rakéta is kb. a AGM-12 Bullpup és a vége felé volt Walleye.
Álcázás és csalik voltak.
11:15
This defensive tactic is so simple yet clever that I'm surprised I never heard about it before. Seems like one of those plucky-yankee stories we love to tell ourselves.
the B-52 which got shot down, some of the plane scraps was used for a set a coffee table, and farming tools
You just forgot to mention one point. Due to the fear of SA 75, fighters have to fly very low and they become easy target for anti-aircraft and even small arms.
Bingo! It's a A(i)rea denial weapon.
Chúng tôi gọi đó là lưới lửa phòng không.
bay cao có s75. thấp hơn có pháo phòng không. thấp hơn nữa là 12,7 ly. thấp nữa là ak47. CKC, ...mọi loại súng trường đều được sử dụng.
You mean like he does at 21:58??
Thank you. This episode is exceptional. It would be great to see more of this detailed kind of graphics.
Here you can find more.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
What a fantastic analysis! Can't wait for more through 2021 and beyond :D
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
You should look up how we Vietnamese used the radar of the 57mm A.A gun to counter the heavily jammer equipped B52-G during Linebacker II of 1972
Pls more detail and source about this statement.
Because it is technically impossible as I know.
@@molnibalage83 basically we already had people bringing all kinds of small AA radar up the mountains of the Ho Chi Minh Trail to test their capability, as well as studying the common flight routes of B52s as far back as 1968. We discoverred that the K860 radar set that comes with the Chinese supplied 57mm AA radar that can run on 10cm and 3cm radar frequencies, can slightly detect B52s insde the heavy jamming environment. There's a 30-page-manual on how to detect a B52 using this radar set, basically explained that base on how the jamm frequency moved and faded you can guess correctly its speed, altitude and headings. We then would shoot a salvo of SA-2 missiles based on this information to increase probability of a hit. We also developted a triangulation of radar positioning to counter B52Gs because they would heavily jam their fronts but not their sides. This tactic was also used on the normal P12 set of the SA-2 to counter AGM-45 equipped F4 Wild Weasel.
@@mcfragger2605 What you wrote has simply no sense from tech. perspective... That eq. simply did not work this way.
@@molnibalage83 im sorry, english isnt my first language and im simply translating from what was published by the VPAF, which is only available in Vietnamese
@@molnibalage83 Just because it doesn't make sense to you, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Second Korean War(ROK, Japan and US vs DPRK, Russia and China)
EU vs OIC(Organization of Islamic Cooperation)
ASEAN vs China
ASEAN vs India
Plz!!
Imagine sitting in that dog cabin on top of a powerful radar
My father was during his military service. He said he felt like being a circus actor. They were strapped with a body harness since the cabin was moving in all directions.
@@vassilkarayonchev1307 Here is continued the story. The Volkhov did not have the "doghouse".
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
This was fascinating. Good show as usual
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Thank you 🙏 AGAIN Binkov this was an excellent succinct informative and flawless video 👍🙏 over many years I have watched countless videos on RUclips and tv and none can hold a candle to your work 💪💪💪 EXCELLENT work Comrade
Can you do the SAM 6 next PLEASE 🙏🙏
SAM 6? Do yo think here the SA-6 / 2K12 Kub?
The SA-6/2K12 is an army air defense system. To understand how it works the army are defense before that the composition of army has to be know.
Of course it can be made a video about technical details and capabilities but without the thing above a part of the video would be meaningless.
If I get the chance I wish to finish the series about the PVO SAMs.
S-75
S-125
S-200
S-300/400
are on the list. The S-350 can comes later because it is part of the new generation of SAMs which are fundamentally different from Cold War SAMs.
I'm a bit sad that almost nobody noticed that not Binkov but a guest author made the video. (Me.)
@@molnibalage83 thank you 🙏 that would be awesome 👍💪😎 I love your work and I am a subscriber and supporter.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
The SA-6 it is on my list but you have to wait for it a bit more.
Amazing content!
I bought your tshirt now I feel like a comrade
My uncle was one of developers of S-25.
Saw most of this stuff at the air war museum in Hanoi ... good to get technical clarity
Superb work! thx
What quality content!
Comrade Grushin’s rockets were the best in the world. Soviet antiair capabilities were very potent.
outstanding work , great video!
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
SA75 is The AK-47 of the SAM world. Mig-21, T - 55 , ZSU-23-4 Shilka, Tu-16 Badger, D - 20 152mm Gun Howitzer, BMP - 1 IFV, Ural trucks.
If you happened to land on this side of the Iron curtain.
There is huge different with S75 was used by Libia at the same time with the Vietnam War.
However, they are unable to take down any aircraft of Israel and even lost their weapons to the hand of the enemy.
Yes, because in Vietnam was not any S-75, only SA-75...
John McCain love this missile system.
Why wouldn’t he? It made him a celebrated war hero. He made millions because of it. His entire life, he was a leader in the most powerful country to ever exist.
Hell yea he loved it.
Great analysis
20:57 so the captured USAF pilot in the novel "without remorse" was right, the SA-75 battery layout does resemble a Star of David.
Israeli Air force general during Yom Kippur war said to general advancing on the ground: "You have a map? Destroy those flowers, and the air support will resume." Flowers being those S-75 sites :D
Wonder if the layout has changed after some experience or if they just left it like that?
Hello Mr. Commissar 1st thing I want to say a huge fan in your videos What A second question It is a versus match Between 2 warships 2 ships USS Iowa versus Russia's battle cruiser I know your very busy person Take the time you need That is all thank you Love your videos Love your videos
1) According to the Russian/Soviet doctrine, the main role of air defense is not to shoot down planes; it was to preserve the ground assets from air attacks and keep them functional or at least possible to repair and redeploy. If you down a plane while doing it - good for you! But downing a plane was merely a bonus...
2) By the end of the Vietnam war, the Vietnamese army had a set of tactics to counter "wild weasels"...
For example, the Americans on wild weasel missions have reported following: they would detect a radar and start following it, directing themselves towards it. Suddenly, that radar would go silent and another one, on different position would appear. So, they would redirect to it... As soon as they would focus on that radar, it too would go silent, but a third one would appear. Naturally, they would go for that one instead. After a while, that radar would go dark... After a few moments, all three radars would suddenly be on and launching missiles from different directions simultaneously!
The end part is just a myth.
Such accurate coordination and timing was not possible without IADS eq. not even with that.
Using only radio, telephones and speech considering the lag in communication made this impossible.
@@molnibalage83 Not according to Americans...
Go to 30:50 at linked video...
ruclips.net/video/IPsHZ_-1kko/видео.html
@@ivanstepanovic1327 USA sources are saying many funny things about Videtnam, like M3.0 speed missile while on the alt. of the fighters the missile barely could reach M2.3...
I know how these systems worked. This was not possible. For this you need a today's level GUI and real time digital data link and shared tactical image.
Doing this with hand drawn plots is not possible.
@@molnibalage83 Spot on. American narrative on Vietnam war is full of lies and propaganda. Some of them don't realize they have lost even now!
bạn đã nói gần đúng những gì đã sảy ra.
excellent video. highly educational. Thank you
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
I was like "how did i miss this" and then i saw the publication date
You can find here more.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
In addition to the AGM-45 Shrike missile the much larger and more capable AGM-78 Standard ARM missile was introduced.
True Binkov is cover up the success of the USAF Wild Weasel, US Navy and Marine aviation successes in counter and destroying SA 2 Fan song radar sam sites, P 35 Bar lock radar and Son 9 Fire can AAA radars, it get to the point that the North Vietnamese SA 2 Sam troopers fear turning on there radar because of Weasel and Iron hands attacking there sites, even the North Vietnamese Air Defense Commander went down to Sam 2 Sam site and forced the Fang song operators to fired, because the crews fear AGM 45 and AGM 78 missiles destroying their Radar Van and Complexes. A Soviet General mention the delivery 95 SA 2 launchers to North Vietnam and 7500 missiles, after Linebacker 2 the North Vietnamese only have 39 launchers left.
@@bjornsmith9431 These are totally inaccurate figures. Much more launchers were available following the Lin II.
We want an SA-3 video.
If Binkov say yes, I'm in it. I guess you wish because of the F-117.
I have to say 99.9% page on the Net is laughably inaccurate about the case. I really wish to made that video to clear things.
Based on this video I guess almost nobody wish to see a video about the S-75M Volkhov.
@@molnibalage83 Thank you, yes i think that is a very poor covered and interesting story.
Haha - MolniBalage :) (Callsign : "Vip" from the old F4 days - I loved your 80's campaigns)
'80s hopefully never will die. ;)
@@molnibalage83 I hope you're well.
Can you do a series covering the US SAM systems? I'm particularly interested in the Nike series. Thanks!
Big nuke go boom.
I think that’s about it
@@tomsoki5738 Well they were so fast that they required ablative coatings, for instance. They also ran off really advanced radars. There's alot more there than big boom, for sure.
It will be explained the Nike + BOMARC but only following the Soviet systems on my channel.
Here is continued the story but Nikes are very far away. First I wish to finish the Soviet ones which makes easier to compare every US made SAMs. But they are on my list.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Very interesting subject thank you
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Detail information very helpfull
As I see once again, contrary to western popularised ideas, the Soviets were even at that time capable of producing complex electronic systems maybe not as sophisticated as those in the US but still perfectly valid. I know people from Tunisia who in the 1970's studied computing in the USSR! At the time we had a cooperation program with them i education, they built many technical universities for us at a time when the west just helped with nice talk.
Yes, roughly this is accurate.
But there was a clear difference during the Cold War. The level of the SAGE in 1954-60 was far beyond the capabililes of the Soviets in the same era.
Interestingly the Vektor and Senezh IADS used literally the same display as the SAGE but 15+ years later. But that time it could be installed the system using only some cabins.
But while in '80s Patriot batteries could share the whole radar image (contacts) with other Patriot batteries the S-300 had much more rigid structure. The command battery with the Big Bird radar shared only the target coordinates of assigned targets and missile batteries could not do this with each other.
@@molnibalage83 yes but on the other hand the soviets relied on the principle that 'quantity is a quality of its own' which is better suited for industrialising third world countries that do not yet have hight tech.
@@thelovertunisia Nope, this is not true.
* The T-64A was so groundbreaking in '60s which is hard to describe. Many countries believed that AP shells has so large firepower which makes impossible to design a real armor for tanks. This leaded to tanks with literally paper armor like the AMX-30 or Leo1. Then arrived the T-64A and changed everything. This was pure quality.
* They developed the dual seeker Igla much before any imaging or pseudo imaging seeker as a new level of IRCCM. They did not want to rely only qty. They wanted quality.
* When you will see the evolution of their SAMs you will understand they aimed always the quality. Many westers systems did not achieve and had the features as Soviets.
This is just another false stereotype about the Russians. I
f they believe only quantity they never would develop a new tank or any weapon system. Yes, the 2nd and 3rd echelon units had old eq. but this was also true for Western states. In fact the 1st echelon units of NATO minors even in '80s used such tanks as Centurion. A post WWII tank....
@@molnibalage83 In this example you are absolutely right. I was thinking in more general terms, at least according to popular belief that Soviet tech (lorries tanks etc..) were simpler but mors rugged that western tech which is too sophisticated and therefore high in maintenance and repair.
There's always propaganda on both sides, sometimes it's almost impossible to know the truth.
Nice video!
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Please do a video about how many nations have to unite in order for them to conquer USA successfully. Pleaaaaaseeeee.
Not cool, Remy. Any invader would lose, just like Russia. Two vast landmasses with lots of weapons. If you conquered us, how would you like to rule us??
1989 Eastern Bloc w/ USSR + China vs USA alone?
@@dakiler2028 80's Cold War Showdown?? Gamed that out countless times. And it was challenging as hell when I played the US. My friend led his American forces far more skillfully.
I am asking because USA can repell an attack from all countries in the world combined. USA have naval, space and technological superiority. In order for them to be invaded is this superiority to be destroyed. But rest of the world is too weak to do that.
@@user-ju2tn4pj5y Oh ok, that's actually interesting. I thought you just disliked the USA. I am Russian on my father's side. The way things are going this very day, Russia is looking rather appealing. 😒
Please Do the Operation Of H-3 ( H-3 Airstrike)
10:30am of 4 April 1981
Binlov awesome videos
Please, more of this, pretty please.
Here.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Awesome! Make it three times as long without any additions though :-)
Interesting and informative video.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
10:38 a SAM simulator developed by a Hungarian, it is free you can try it out.
I want to try it out!
@@patnolen8072 Write into google: SAM simulator and you will find it.
Like this video, very informative
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
I liked the video before even seeing it
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Wow!
I had the chance to witness the S-75 in action in Somali/Ethiopian war in 1977-78.
Wait, what year is it again? Vietnam still hasnt moved on from the guideline?
Operations Room channel has a great video about Vietnam War SAMs vs B-52s 🙋🇺🇲⚒️🇷🇺
Sadly that channel many times is very inaccurate. For ex. the F-117 vs Neva is mostly just repeat the usual ULs...
Do the QE aircraft carrier, with F35b, Astute, 2x T45 and 2x T23 against US carrier strike force
Sitting ducks for Russian and Chinese anti-ship missiles.
Electric hypersonic inertia projectile may make it beyond all defense
Сэр, я хочу, чтобы вы сняли видео с деталями цветов на S forh
Dam! This shit is so hard. You have to be a mathematician to run a SAM site practically.
Not exactly but what do computers it had to be done by man humans.
Turned out to be a decent SAM system for its day, knocked down a couple u2, chased a few SR71, away. Where the SR71 would either stay outside the SAM envelope or they would travel above mach 3.15.
The SA-2 family never chased away any SR-71.
On my channel I plan to make w Mythbusting about SR-71 because what is commonly on the Net is totally false or badly interpreted.
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft well known that chinese sa2 chased them, out of chinese airspace and engaged the drone version of the sr71. These sr71 were deployed to japan at the time. Several sr71 pilots are on recording talking about it. Its one of the reasons they retired the A12
@@jonathantarrant2449 1. The SR-71 could perform noise jamming.
2. Which forces the system into three point (T/T) guidance.
3. If you check the the engagement zone diagrams you simply cant find such engagement envelop diagram regarding 1000 m/s. Because the max. target speed with T/T was 640 m/s. And even up to 640 m/s the zone was restricted compared to half-leading zone.
ruclips.net/video/noYxsLqSMjI/видео.html
Yes, many times were launched missile on SR-71 and they never had a real chance to down it because of this. It was too fast. Even without the noise jamming engaging such a fast cross flying target was close to impossible.
Nobody even "chased" the SR-71. They flew wherever they want as long as they met only with any version of the SA-2.
Following the El Dorado Canyon a Volhov launched a missile against the SR-71 and they missed as usual. (And one of them broke into pieces in the turn.)
But the SR-71 avoided the the only operational SA-5 / S-200E site.
The export of the SA-5 did not happened until the mid '80s.
So as I have said until that SR-71 flew wherever they want except over the USSR, WPACT or where the politics banned it.
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft im not disagreeing with you there is a book out on the blackbird, it wrote by one of the pilots. He just into detail about chinese mission and explains the sa2 engagements
@@jonathantarrant2449 Will all respect, many times I have experienced that Western / US pilots had no idea about the air defense what they are talking about. They are very good in their field but their knowledge is outdated and based on 30-40+ year old knowledge. Which is now declassified also in RUS.
B-52 perfect target for SAM-2
Mobile direct energy and sonic may be good and sunpower laser or real nigh laser and long range Phalanx automatic of 250 mm drill shape bullet shape is inertia hypersonic too and if use tracer help more accurate missile too
Binkov Pls make a video that is can timur conquer china?
So at 14:13 Binkov say that they use crayons to plot, I was wonder what the Soviets called them? Is it a locate brand of crayons or is it just crayon?
It was a nothing special crayon.
But it did come in many colours! 😁
Pls do Ethiopia vs Egypt and who will win?
Binkov your crazy......haha i love you......amazing!!!......u never rick roll !!!!!!!!???
If you need the feedback, I prefer your last animations better
A puppet and art-of-war knowledge is.. Complementary
Did mirage technology began in Russia because french failed in waterloo mean that Russia may able to remove water by advance thermo kinetic if it detect
What about the israeli radar jammers used in the '80s ?
Were they used against SA-2 ?
What jammers are you thinking here exactly?
F-4s used the ALQ-119 what IAF got from US.
The F-16s also carried pod (ALQ-119 later ALQ-131), the F-15 had inbuilt US jammer.
@@molnibalage83 That was the question, what jammers were used and against what .
@@darkoneforce2 ALQ-119 I'm pretty sure it was used. Against the SA-6/2K12 in 1973 IAF feared to use the VGPO type of jamming because they did not trust. Their fear was that it makes just a better target the plane.
The ALQ-131 could do new kind of deception jamming against the Dvina but against that partially the Volhkov was prepared.
The combination of leading - jamming and many other factors made complex the jamming topic. Itself the whole EW is not an easy topic.
You should do Sweden vs Denmark.
I want to read books or articles written by Balázs Molnár about SAMs. A google search for Balázs Molnár shows a footballer; maybe this is the same person?
Nope we are not the same.
I wrote these. The video is the modified, corrected and expanded version what I wrote here.
www.mediafire.com/folder/ibpuhagkr7a8w/ENG_-_HT_Osszefoglalo
@@molnibalage83 Fascinating! These documents on mediafire have interesting information about SAMS!
@@patnolen8072 ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Here is continued the story of the SAMs.
What system would be best to down a Malaysian civilan plane
Dinosaur vs the s300v4,etc. However, the new systems come from somewhere.
Yes, the is the point of the series. Following these it would be much more understandable the S-300 and in fact even the SA-8 --> SA-15 transition.
Do Canada vs Brazil next
Yeee
200 planes downed?! North Vietnam air force only had not more than 20 at a time.
all this video taught me is that Marines couldn't operate the s-75. when the course plotting involves crayons
En ese momento había distancia entre China y la URSS, por eso Vietnam no tuvo todas las armas para detener a los gringos
First Rate First Class Video 👍
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Please make a video about "Could U.S invade Asia?" MY MIND: IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
Why would US invade Asia lol
The current equivalent to this is what? Buk? S350?
There is no equivalent with S-75. Because it is outdated.
The closest system to the SA-75/SA-75 is the Nike Ajax but still, there are many, many conceptional differences between them.
Here is continued the story.
ruclips.net/channel/UCzdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g
Wiki say...."According to the Vietnamese, the S-75 shot down 1046 aircraft, or 31% of all downed US aircraft.", ti komšo reče 205?
Just ignore the wiki. It is simply garbage in the topic.
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft I agree Wiki is shit, but on many military forums numbers are very similar..
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft wiki has many sources to check. So its not a garbage
@@Leonid_Brezhnev1
I use original declassified Soviet documents...
@@militavia-air-defense-aircraft 205 planes its american clame, no the soviet
Death by PowerPoint
Do one with bangladesh and Myanmar please.
reloading the sam time diretly on the ramp 1 minutes 10 secons to ramp in battle situation! with tlf approach a little bit longer .. I was the launch pad leader!
ZIL driver here (operator 3). :P
@@imrekalman9044 nice!
Do malaysia vs philiphines
Fire control systems, the very thing mostly disregarded