Roger Federer's on-court row with referee | Roland Garros 2021 | Eurosport Tennis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 май 2022
- News and coverage from the #1 sports destination and the #HomeofTennis in Europe. Watch Eurosport anytime, anywhere via: bit.ly/3boIVvd
We bring you some of the biggest sports events in the world, such as Wimbledon, US Open, Australian Open, French Open, Olympic Games, The Davis Cup, WTA Finals, ATP Finals, French Open, amongst so many more.
Do you want to see more? Subscribe now to watch Eurosport anytime, anywhere: bit.ly/3boIVvd
Follow us on:
RUclips: goo.gl/o9rbKg
Facebook: goo.gl/jMfLNR
Twitter: goo.gl/jxT1fY
Instagram: bit.ly/2TOtykZ 
Спорт
I don’t understand a thing but it’s great to hear Roger speaks French.
In switzerland we have 3 languages. A citizen is learning french OR italian OR german as a 2nd language in school. Thus we are kind of expected to speak (german and french) OR (german and italian) OR (italian and french).
This way, we should be able to communicate with everyone in switzerland, because everyone should be able to speak 2 out of 3 languages.
(To my fellow swiss citizens, I KNOW about rumantsch, its irrelevant to the point im trying to make.)
Only Fed could get away with talking this long to an umpire without being booed.
I love the fact that Federer is arguing with him in French.
time violations are so counterproductive given most of the time the player will argue with the umpire, taking more time 😂 not to mention Roger wasn’t even in the wrong here
The time violation is absurd. The previous point ends at 0:15, and by 0:32 the umpire is calling “time violation.” Federer didn’t break any specific rule, Cilic was serving fast on purpose because he knew Federer was on the far doubles sideline. I’ve seen returners in open tournaments delay their opponents’ serves by 40 seconds right in front of an umpire with no penalty. Federer took a perfectly average time between points. His average time between serves is literally 17 seconds, so he should be allowed to take the exact same time between returns without warnings that interrupt the game.
Comparing to Djokovic or Nadal.
So much respect from Cilic, he was kinda pissed, but tried to deliver it to Roger in a most polite way, thats how you handle things. Bravo, Marin
I counted 14 seconds between the end of the point and the warning... seems kind of ridiculous honestly lol
You're a bad counter.
It's 20-21 seconds since the point ended & more importantly, about 13 seconds since the score called, that Federer got warned. And he is still not back, ready to return with his slow walking. Federer doesn't get to use up most of his opponents service clock before opponent can even start his service routine. That's taking complete control of the pace of play from the server.
First of all, timer starts counting at score call. secondly, 20 second timer doesnt count for returners only for servers. Returners are supposed to play on servers pace. That said, all players are allowed a towel use btw each every point. Roger started walking to towel instantly when the point ended wasting no time. And used towel in 3 seconds. Is he supposed to run back and forth? No. Is he supposed to skip towel if he needs it? Again no. Leniency should have been given considering the distance, that roger wasted no time at all, and considering ball boys had just stopped carrying the towels and players have to walk back and forth to them. Yes play at servers pace but only up to a point. If you're not deliberatly wasting time server is supposed to wait for you to use towel if he is kyrgios-styling
All that said, cilic did that on purpose and its obvious that he wanted roger to be given a penalty.
Federer is known to play Fast between Points and Should get a lot of Leeway from The Umpire for things like this especially if not on Purpose...And they have to get their own Towels as well...Rules are Rules but come on
20 SECONDS BETWEEN THE END OF THE POINT AND THE WARNING, WHICH WAS UNNECESSARY. THE WARNING ONLY SERVED TO EXTEND FEDERER'S REST/RECOVERY.
Roger Federer ❣️
I think the umpire had a point.
Come on McEnroe 😂😂😂
😂,YOU, get down here...
There are no ball kids getting towels so it's going to take longer than usual.
& We've seen Cilic play Nadal(who takes his time) and he does not rush his serves like that, so it was a clear tactic on his end to get the umpire involved which worked lol
Haha- if Nadal did this- everyone would be licking his butt literally, but when Fed does this- he's the pantomime villain!
Cillic is probably on the right side on that one. You play following the tempo of the server, and the receiver has to try to respect that. Federer himself is notorious for having a quick service rutine.
But on this occasion Roger was on the other end of the court and he had to come all the way accros to get the towel...it wasnt like he took so much time with his towel....come on bro
not in this case. the returner also has to meet the 25 second quota and its the servers responsibility as per the rules to wait for the returner. its also not his fault that cilic needs to get to the baseline quickly to start bouncing the ball for 20 minutes
Federer got warned about 13 seconds after the score was called & he still wasn't back in position to return. He has to make a better effort than that slow walk when he's taking up most of Cilic's service clock before he can start his service routine.
Rules are rules? No?
One of the worst things in the history of men’s tennis to do is make Roger Federer angry. It’s probably not going to end well for you just as it did not end well for Čilić in this match.
Cilic has to understand that he was playing with the G.O.A.T. so he has to wait for him.
All this whining just to quit in the next round.
Cunning delaying tactics by Federer. His complaint was also part of the delaying tactics while he was down in the set
Cry
Now without crying
Cope harder
Very cunning tactics from Federer.
Is not tactic,is covid rules that doesn’t allow a player to be at the speed of a quick server.
Laku je malo nervozannn hahaha federeee
fed lossed 4 times in finals at wimbledon to djoki/ndal..nadal lossed zero times at french and noval lossed zero too at aussie
That's because a lot of time Nadal didn't make the finals.
@@tomsd8656 Fedsqaush couldn't even beat nadal once at french and had 18 years to do it!!
@@canski5646 Well he's just not as good as Nadal on clay, fangirl.
@@tomsd8656 they are tied on GS matches hard and grass so fedsquash didn't domiante there!! or Djoki he 6 and 4 on hard, 3 and 1 on grass and they are tied 1 and 1 French so Djoki domianted over career..Overall fed was domianted by rivals novak/nadal. H2H, GS Finals and GS matches, Master Titles
@@canski5646 no no no fan girl, your memory had deserted you. How old are you ? Federer beat Nadal at Wimbledon in 2006, 2007, and 2019. Nadal beat Fed in 2008. How is that equal, not to mention all other times when federer won Wimbledon, Nadal wasn't in final.
thankfully nadal and djoki came along to save tennis from fedsqaush
Extremely bad umpiring and guess what, you don't see a lot of this umpire. Absolute tool, less than 19 seconds and he's calling time violation.
50% of fed's titles were on the B Circuit 250/500
Q
i agree. federer is shit
Bro why are you so desperate....is everything okay in your life?
@@joelsuraj2501 hey teenager thx for concern but try and focus on tennis if u can
@@canski5646 okay old man
fedsqaush only won 33% of the time he played novak/nadal at GS that is 1 out of 3 tries!!
You can't read numbers. Djokovic and Nadal are almost from a different generation. Djokovic beat Federer for the first time in a GS when Roger was already 28, and the second time when he was almost 30. Nadal played and beat Federer even before, but he faced him only in the finals of the French and other clay tournaments and almost never in other GS or other tournaments, because Nadal didn't reach the final stages in those. That's why Wimbledon 2008 was a big thing and that's why Fed and Djokovic and Nadal had (and have) almost the same number of slams when the H2H statistics are in favour of Nadal and Djokovic.
@@milvao3400 that means when fed won 15 slams 2003-2009 and the field was so weak , no threats and got the cinderella era ...when djoki/nadal came along got their game going fedsqaush couldn't keep up
@@canski5646 No, the field wasn't weak at all in 2003-2009. That just explains why the h2h is in favour of Djokovic and Nadal: not because they're way better than Federer, but because for a long time Nadal played Federer mostly in clay court finals, because they were both top seeds and Nadal didn't reach the finals in hard/grass events....and Djokovic played (and beat) Federer mostly when Federer was in his 30s. Before 2011, Roger was 13-6 against Djokovic.
@@milvao3400 theses debates are useless...Fed had a horrible losing record agaisnt nadal/djoki OVERALL during his career ..no one looks at this period or that period , this match or which decade in the end.... next you will be using the stars, moon ,color of the sky.... or u will be saying tom brady is too old and not fair to younger players or he played when the sun was out..Fed had a weak backhand, weak mental strength and couldn't keep up and if he did he would have dominated his 2 rivals OVERALL!!
@@canski5646 What you're doing is useless. You don't like Federer, we get it, you're wasting your time insulting and not understanding what I'm saying. Nadal was no.2 in 2005-2007 but he had a winning record against Federer who was the no.1 because they always played in the final of clay tournaments, with Nadal losing in the earlier rounds of grass/hard tournaments.
Salty as always.
fedsqaush only won 33% of his GS matches agaisnt nadal/djoki that is a complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at French and had 18 years to do it!! Fed lossed 3 times in Finals in a row to Djoki at Wimbledon on his supposed best surface and had the crowds on his side too... that means fed mentally is very weak just like his backhand return game
thankfully nadal and djoki came along to save tennis from Fedsqaush....Fed can now focus and his real skill selling running shoes and watches
And u can focus on great journalism
You’re too obsessed
@@gmnboss please try and focus on the players if u can
@@serveoutwide try and focus on the players if u can
@@canski5646 try and not be such a biased little delusional joke and the world will be a better place. You’re a troll
the only true ambasador to the games of tennis is djoki ...fed is phony and not very bright u see in post mtch speeches just sounds jibberish as compared to novaks who is very articulated and always hassomething to say
tf dude
have you seen dojo raging
Fed=GOAT
@@chao3943 exactly if fed had any real emotion he could have had better results to beat nadal/djoki but he just passive and mentally weak sqaush player
@@chao3943 goat at running shoe and watch sales
@@chao3943 called sports mr chao maybe u should watch chess
roger is spoiled like his up bringing depended on crowds to get him through but when it came to nadal/djoki he failed miserably in GS matches agaisnt them only winning 33% of the time!! Never beat nadal once at french...roger did sell lots of running shoes
Federer IS Tennis...Without him Tennis is gonna take a BIG dip
@@jackwoods9604 we are doing good without him, good riddance!!
@@jackwoods9604 Roger is running shoe and watch sales not tennis
@FichDich InDemArsch Yikes...You guys seem so BITTER when it comes to Federer...Probably because Your Fave player is not nearly as ADORED by Fans and by Tennis Like Federer is...Oh well
You're here too with the same comment 🤣
What a disgrace you are! Have some shame at least and get a life and a job