How Accurate is my SYIL X7?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
  • In this video, I mill a simple Circle Diamond Square model and then measure the part for accuracy. Disclaimer, I don’t have a metric micrometer, so I’m using an outside micrometer with an accuracy of .0001” and converting to metric. I plan on taking the part to the metrology lab on campus to measure again.
    Additionally, how I tool-path and mill the part has a huge impact on the ultimate accuracy. For example, the bore seems the most inaccurate, but in my opinion that is more likely due to the tool-path versus the capabilities of the Syil. It did wonderfully everywhere else.
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 20

  • @PowerForgeWorkshop
    @PowerForgeWorkshop  7 месяцев назад +4

    This video should be titled, How Accurate is my CAM? I have learned so much about my machine and Fusion 360 since making this. The SYIL is very capable and accurate. Definitly more consistent than me. 😁

  • @Oryx_custom
    @Oryx_custom Год назад +3

    Nice video 👏🏻, waiting for more videos about the SYIL X7

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  Год назад

      Thank you! More videos are definitely coming. I still have much to learn.

  • @quintinsmits
    @quintinsmits Год назад +3

    Looking really good!
    I just did that same test on my small wood cutting CNC (bought at a thrift store for €25, replaced the old controller with an Arduino running GRBL). Apparently, it has different pitched lead screws on the X and Y. 😅

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  Год назад +2

      That's cool. We also run a wood-cutting CNC router in the woodshop. I'll admit that's where I got the idea for this video.
      We're in the middle of using a micro-controller to make a manual pulse generator (MGP) for the router. It's an interesting project. I definitely need glasses and a magnifying glass to see well enough to solder those tiny pins.

  • @SchysCraftCo.
    @SchysCraftCo. Год назад

    Always good to test your self.

  • @TAWPTool
    @TAWPTool Год назад +1

    Interesting test. Thanks for sharing!

  • @Bromo_Sexual
    @Bromo_Sexual 7 месяцев назад +2

    Why was the bore accuracy so bad? What can Syil do to make it perfect? 😮

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  7 месяцев назад +1

      The accuracy (or lack of) was my fault. The numbers I got were due to my speeds and feeds and the deflection in the small endmill I was using. All of my measurements were one and done, meaning I ran the part once, and then measured. I learned that I need to be more thoughtful when programming small bores.
      Recently, I had to hit a number on an internal bore to allow a sliding fit. I didn't his the number on my first try, but after a couple of spring passes I hit my tolerance.
      On the bright side, at least it's not milling too much material. I think it's reasonable to account for deflection by running a spring pass or adjusting wear using cutter compensation.

    • @jankaas2760
      @jankaas2760 6 месяцев назад +2

      Calipers dont have a perfect knive edge.
      So you are basicly measuring with 4 points wich wil give you an smaller reading.

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  6 месяцев назад +1

      @@jankaas2760 That's a great point! Thank you

  • @jiaweizhang7113
    @jiaweizhang7113 Год назад +2

    -0.20mm for a 10mm bore seems ridiculous for such machine, is there any update on why this happens?

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  Год назад

      I'm much more familiar with the Syil now. My biggest mistake during this test piece was pushing the tool path too aggressively. The helical bore wasn't a bad strategy but I think my final contour path was too aggressive and my endmill deflected. For better accuracy, I like to leave less on the walls for the finish pass and even follow up with a final spring pass. I programmed repeat passes on the square and diamond and the measurements were better.

    • @dancollins1012
      @dancollins1012 Год назад +2

      ​@@PowerForgeWorkshop I use gwizard calculator, it calculates the deflection

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  Год назад

      @@dancollins1012 Cool, I'll check it out.

    • @adriand.896
      @adriand.896 7 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@PowerForgeWorkshop A lot of people, especially when first getting into CNC programming, don't realize there is a conversion that needs to be done for circular interpolation especially when dealing with bores. Some CAM software and machines can do the compensations for it, but a lot don't, so the feed rates people normally post out are much higher than they should be. There is a multiplier you need to apply to the feed rates: (Diameter you're cutting - tool diameter ) / (Tool diameter)
      Example: Cutting .375 inch bore with a 4 flute 1/4" tool (RPM at 3000, chip load per tooth of .001)
      Linear feed rate: 3000(RPM)*.001(chip load)*4(# of flutes) = 12 inches per minute
      Circular feed adjustment: (.375-.250)/(.375) = 1/3
      Adjusted feed rate = 12*(1/3) = 4 inches per minute

    • @PowerForgeWorkshop
      @PowerForgeWorkshop  7 месяцев назад +1

      @@adriand.896 Awesome! Thanks, I'll put that in my tool box for future use. I already have your comment copied to a word doc.