Cyberpunk 2077 Path Tracing VS Ultra Settings FSR 1440p | 7900 XTX | R9 7950X 3D
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 апр 2024
- ENEBA - great place to buy games (PS5, Xbox, PC)! ene.ba/Bang4Buck
All games, DLC! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-Store
Gift Cards! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-GiftCards
Affiliate
SCAN.CO.UK - A great place to buy PC parts tidd.ly/4aLCyyk
Check out how the RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ and Ryzen 9 7950X 3D performs in Cyberpunk 2077 using Path Tracing VS Ultra Settings at 1440p using FSR 2.1 Quality.
My PC Specification
AMD Ryzen 9 Ryzen 9 7950X 3D
Asus ROG Strix X670E-F Gaming WIFI Motherboard
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900 XTX
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 6400Mhz @6200MHz DDR5 32GB 16x2 CL28-37-37-28 trc 68 1.43v
Custom Waterloop
EK CoolStream XE 360mm Radiator
EK-WB Velocity AMD Waterblock
XSPC Photon X270 Reservoir V2 with D5 Vario Pump.
AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition Driver 24.3.1
Corsair HX1000i PSU
Samsung 850 EVO 1 TB
Samsung 860 QVO 1 TB
Pioneer 1TB SSD APS-SL3-1T
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD 1TB
LG B9 "55" 120Hz 4K HDR Smart TV.
Thermal Take View 71 Full Tower Case
Windows 11 Pro Version 22H2
#7950x3d #rx7900xtx #cyberpunk2077 
Игры
The Path Tracing performance hit is insane. Efforts must be doubled at AMD. The 7900 XTX can do Path Tracing, just not very well.
Man, I don't see the justification for such a reduction in performance, they look really similar to one another.
Not worth the FPS loss. Basically getting console type of FPS with it on. And the visual improvement although nice, isn't gigantic to warrant the FPS being down to 40ish from 170.
How come the path tracing version is so much less sharp?
I can only justify it with the FSR 3 mod
fps mode all day
Path Tracing isn't worth the performance hit. Just use normal ray tracing
On the contrary, the difference in visuals between the path tracing and ray tracing mode is greater than the difference between traditional raster and ray tracing mode
path tracing is def worth it
@@bzrt554 To some people's eyes, there's little difference. People have to point out the differences. I dunno, for me it doesn't seem to warrant the performance loss, the amount of power these GPU's use and the world we live in, do we really need all this power?
Rtx 4080 can do path tracing 70+fps 1440p with dlss quality no frame generation. With frame gen it's 100+ fps
4:38 My rtx 4070super did 40+fps with the same settings, path tracing with dlss quality WITHOUT frame generation.
It's not the same settings, as I bet you used Ray reconstruction and gained performance. DLSS works better performance wise with RT enabled. FSR works better with Raster. Also there's the recording penalty from Radeon Relive.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer ok I will try it later today with fsr and I will not turn on ray reconstruction.
@@Bang4BuckPCGamer I just tried it today with fsr quality and ray reconstruction off, PT on 1440p. Basically copied your exact settings and I got 30+ fps on that same cutscene. Highest was 38fps I think.
It's crazy because the 7900xtx is way faster on raster but the moment you turn on path tracing, they became equal.
Path tracing is terrible!