As a non lawyer im highly irritated by these repeated questions, this is like 5 year old keeps asking you same question over and over again because he is bored.
Imagine finding out 20 years later that your friend had your back the entire time and you had no clue you were significant enough to him that he made sure you were taking care of the whole time without your knowledge. Damn good friend
Its also possible this witness is smart enough to derail this line of interrogation by stating he doesn't know. Technically no one can disprove his "ignorance". Shrewd, is how his response strikes me. People are willing to go the extra mile for JD - obviously he's well liked & his easy-going generosity is legendary.
@@sweetpea4967 actually I just called him smart for sidestepping this BS line of interrogation- much of which attempted to paint him as someone beholden to JD
This is crazy. All I can say is, this dude has true friends. It seems she is the aggressor. And he is the submissive/introvert. But, when your friends love you, it shows something.
She’s a terrible attorney fighting a losing case. I’m embarrassed for her. I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!
To be fair, I wouldn't say she's a terrible attorney. She and the rest of the legal team are trying to make as strong of an argument as possible while having really shitty situation on their hand. It's not a case if you want an easy win, but intead it's a case where everyone is getting a huge paycheck for trying - because regardless of the outcome someone's going to cover the legal expenses 100%. With all of this going down I think they're doing their best to not look like complete fools in court, which is a challenge of it's own considering what they have to work with, and present with a straight face.
I don’t know the ages of the commentators here. BuI am old enough to remember the damage to property, the bloody fights between him and the model Kate Moss for a long time before he met Ms Parisi. There were other women, but back in the day the “Me Too” movement was just wishful thinking and we women were silent. We all saw how rape victims were treated in court. If a woman dare to bring her case to court more than not Women were discouraged by police and others to drop charges. I love Mr. Depp’s work and I want to see more of it. But his reputation as a drinker and drug user has always been an open secret in Hollywood. He is a heavy drinker and passes out. People who drink heavily can become quiet or mean. They can be physical too. I’m not saying anything people who deal with heavy drinkers don’t know. She has a lot of issues too. I think this is mostly very sad. I know women love him but he’s putting on a good performance and he’s a great actor, remember that. She didn’t ruin his career she just gave the studios another reason to not work with him because of his erratic behavior on set and the money it cost them to delay the picture. While he was with Ms Parisi, he was so much better and in a good place. If he really wants to work he can do what a lot of actors are doing. He has the money to be the producer of independent films and he can get good people and good writers and he has fans who will come to see him. He needs to take responsibility for his behavior and why studios don’t want to work with him. Word of mouth and losing money travel fast in Hollywood. This woman fought back. Most women do nowadays and they have the support women like me; your mothers, grandmas,aunts, didn’t have back in the day.I love the phrase, “I don’t remember”, excellently coached by lawyers to not lie on the stand, but to evade.
"I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!" She could be a lesbian?
I'm only 13 minutes into this but I don't see any benefit or detriment to this attorney's questioning. What does it have to do with anything? It seems like a big waste of time.
I had forgotten how NASTY ELAINE was and how she put in statements that she knew would be rightfully objected to. She didn’t care as long as the Judge was cool and the jury had heard it. She went DIRTY to try to win this case even if she had to throw innuendos and fecal material at decent people in the process. I hope she loses the case just like she lost her integrity and human decency.
The way Amber’s attorney is behaving should be illegal. Literally putting words into the witnesses mouth and not giving him a chance to answer the question. Even if he says no, she badgers him trying to get him to change the answer. It’s disgusting.
Lol you are describing cross-examination. The whole point is to badger someone into saying what you want them to say. She was pretty clunky though, and talking over the answers was not good.
It’s actually a pretty good indicator of desperation. Yea, there’s value in getting a witness to break down on the stand or badger them to get them to lose their cool. But if you have a true and compelling argument I think a good attorney can just use the truth to destroy witnesses.
I agree, I think Amber's team has too much on their hands trying to defend that woman. She's guilty as sin. You can tell by the way the attorneys behave, they have nothing so they try to make something out of nothing.
Judge should be firm with her constant talking over witness and interrupting him. Depp's attorney should be objecting to that kind of rudeness and unprofessional behavior.
Guys, I am not a lawyer, but it seems like 80% of the questions she asked him had no relevance to the abuses and fights. Why was she allowed to go on with it?
5 minutes in and all she's proven is that johnny is so generous and kind and genuinely wants the best for the people he loves and tries his best to help them lmao 🤣
It seems like she was trying to prove that Wyatt was somehow beholden to Depp or had been bought somehow. I don't think it ever occurred to her that the contract clauses were acts of pure generosity.
I genuinely don't understand the point though. If he was being paid the Union Minimum, as he here testified several times, how is Johnny being 'generous' by having that written into his contract, which Elaine alleges (without proving) several times? Why is the Union Minimum so freaking "generous"? What is her point, what the hell is she trying to prove with this? I hope the jury is not as confused and dizzy as I feel right now. Why does Elaine think it's so extraordinary, perhaps corrupt, that his hotel was paid for? Does she think think people performing important jobs on movie sets pay for their own location accommodations, so that all professionals can only afford to work in their own hometowns? (She might be completely 100% shielded, like Dr. Spiegel, from all information about acting, and does not even know these people might be caught rehearsing.)
What do you mean "generous"? Yes, of course, normally he is to a fault, but I do not see that here in anything Elaine has obtained, I am just confused - he's getting Union minimum for God's sake!
It's about the fact that johnny puts him in his contract and so giving him work opportunities, and she's trying to prove he also asks to give him nice hotels and other privileges, and by that proves that he is a paid witness ''on his pay rolls like they liked to say
@@lezamac6 100% disagree. This witness comes across as very truthful, likeable and undeserving of being aggressively questioned in this manner. This entire cross comes across as desperate. She didn't do herself any favors.
Yes, she is asking questions that have really nothing to do with him abusing her. Amber has already admitted to hitting him on tape, who is the abuser here?
What an awful interrogation. This is almost abuse in itself. On top of it all this lawyer does not even seem to understand the film industry. Horrific.
There is a presiding Judge, if it was abuse she would stop the so called interrogation, it's cross examination and designed to help people who have bad memories recall what happened.
@@whitneyangelie3682 While I wouldn’t use the word ‘abuse’ to describe their motives/wording, but it is most definitely textbook manipulation to get a witness to try to come to the same delusional portrayal that they came up with.
Imagine just thinking that you're good friends with Depp but he's been looking after you and other crews all these years. Really goes to show how he just wants to help without feeling the need to fuel his ego.
That has NOTHING to do with the actual defamation case though. I don't see it that way AT ALL. I see this EMPLOYEE of Dep's is typical of Hollyweird "Friendships". They barter EVERYTHING - and EVERYTHING is in exchange for something....
Basically, all this horrible attorney proved, was that Johnny is an even greater man & employer than this guy thought. He treats ALL of his employees, and everyone around him very well.
Smart man takes care of his friends, his friend will take care of him. We just don't know how truthful these testimonies are that we're hearing here. Could they be perjuring themselves for Johnny Depp? If he falls, they fall. If he doesn't work, they don't get paid.
Because Johnny surrounds himself with enablers of his drug use, through even long-standing contractual agreements (ensuring subsequent productions hire certain personnel who happen to be enablers). This power structure helps to compare the levels of control over the dysfunctional relationship between he and Amber. Furthermore, does Johnny’s using adversely affect his reliability as a victim of ‘Amber as sole abuser.’ Clearly, it was sadly a dysfunctional marriage largely in part due to the bubble of substance abuse in which toxicity was maintained, and if Johnny’s using was often an impetus of dysfunction, then Amber’s defense has a valid foundation of argument.
This woman is awful. She's clearly trying to lead the witness and is failing miserably. I can't believe this judge allowed her to badger the witness like this. How appalling and pathetic.
That is her job. She is trying to extract information in a way that supports Heard's defense. Maybe you can critique her style and effectiveness, but saying, "[she] needs to be fired" is ridiculous. Heard's position is losing from the start, so of course, her defense will try to grab the smallest of leads to persuade the jury.
What’s crazy is you can tell he’s actually surprised Johnny made sure he was in his personal contracts to make sure he was absolutely secured everything he would need even if the other company’s had any kind of mess up Johnny would use his own contract to make sure he’s secured that’s one hell of a good friend.
What I don't understand is how the judge allowed her lawyer to press him about Depp's contracts. It's beyond hearsay. He has no way of knowing yet the judge allowed it.
I love this witness, he stands up to this attorney. And she makes herself look bad. As a lawyer , she is badgering the witness. But, she is making herself look terrible to the jurors. Johnny, looking good.
If y’all wanna palate cleanser, I recommend watching the video of Amber‘s former assistant. It’s the male lawyer but he tries to badger her as well but she’s not having it. She’s my new favorite person.
It is a shame only those testifying can be treated as "hostile" and not the lawyers themselves. Why the judge didn't tell this lawyer to move on is beyond common sense.
That’s the whole system of English Law? It’s the only workable approach. Lawyers aren’t in court to be cross examined? They are there to expose the evidence and the facts.
Everyone keeps talking about Amber's attorney in this comment section but this judge is absolutely horrid to allow her to continue this line of questioning.
She was trying to discredit him - repeatedly ask him a bunch of mostly irrelevant questions about people dates, events, etc., trying to catch him up. Suffice it to say, it backfired hugely. This guy's solid and the lawyer looked ridiculous.
This lawyer's logic is so flawed. "You didn't see it happen so it could have still happened and no one saw" yeah and Johnny Depp could have preformed open heart surgery on the back of the plane. You just didn't see it,
@@jonahjameson8224 I agree with what you’re saying but if I tell you I’ve paid them a few 100k would you believe me? I think it’s a very dirty world but honestly I’m considering going to law school so I can defend myself going forward.
Usually, the defense's attorneys try not to be confrontational with the plaintiff's witnesses because it makes the jury dislike them. She's doing a good job of being dislikeable.
Yes she is badgering the witness! 💯 Judge what does this have to do with the case really he also made it clear they're good friends what the hell! Does this have to do with abuse or the case at all! 🤬
I see it as they are trying to get him to admit johnny is incompetent, I feel that's the narrative they are going with, a guy forgets lines etc, but all have said positive things about him. They are asking about his income to prove he is beholden to Johnny and to paint him as not a credible witness.
There's another one. I don't know what the question was, but the answer from the wintness:"After I left I wasn't there, that's correct!" referring to seeing something that would be in favor of AH.
“You don’t know what happens behind closed doors… DO YOU?” "No." "So then do you know what happened behind THESE closed doors?" "Still no" "How about THESE closed doors?" "Still no." "Okay, and how about THEEEESSSEE closed doors?" "Your Honor, objection, ridiculous" "I'll allow it" "DO YOU?" "Still no." "ok and then so what about THESE closed doors???????"
I have been sussing this judge since day 1 with the first witness she seems bias to Amber's side. These questions though and if the witness does not give her the answer she wants them to she strikes it so why ask the question in the first place? unlike her client some people actually prefer telling the truth on that stand
Why is this Judge allowing such repetitive, questions, over and over. Just to confuse the jurors? The Attorney is ridiculous. How can he answer questions about things he wasn’t privy to. Just a ridiculous waste of time.
This lawyer is so disrespectful to the judge! She does not even wait for her to react to the objections raised. She just steamroller on! The judge should not allow this bullying from her!
Im hoping that it will be so that if he wins, there can be little to no challenge later. Give her side everything they ask. Good judges, if she transpires to be 1 of them, also have strategy and foresight
Was wondering the same thing. What an idiot prosecutor. Clearly low IQ who just scraped thru the bar and deserves to go to jail for lowering American IQ.
I really like this person. He puts up with the hassling and repetition and deliberately confusing nonsense so politely and coolie. Makes the lawyer look like a desperate arse.
me too. what a cool dude. showed the lawyer up, that’s for sure. she’s incompetent! asking the most ridiculous and irrelevant questions! the judge is not much better, letting her witter on and harassing a perfectly innocent witness! I’m quite shocked. leading the witness etc. Disgraceful.
This lawyer can’t help herself , she’s Condescending and Rude when there’s absolutely no need for it , all she does is make herself sound combative towards witnesses and has no basis for half her questions, they already can’t stand her client , she should try being polite and less nasty cause all it does is reflect back to her Client, this dude isn’t a witness where u gotta be aggressive with , her overall TONE speaks for Ambers personality - NASTY
defamation lawsuits are always difficult to pull through. That ain't actually a bias, unless you can provide specific examples. And even if Johnny prevails, he won't get even close to the money he wants. And before you say that I'm on Amber's side here...I'm not. Actually rooting for Johnny, but unfortunately manipulative narcissists get off extremely easy in US courts.
@@Raussl I completely agree. All the defense needs to do is show clear and convincing evidence that what Amber quoted in that article wasn't libel. I wonder when she takes the stand she will try to claim it wasn't about Depp.
@@bonniehowell9206 I think they have it with the kitchen cabinet slamming video. No excuse for that. Most comments are making the excuse that his mother just died and he just found out he was getting robbed. I would not live with the person who behaved that way. And I’m sure it wasn’t the first time. They are both sick people and the whole thing should be dropped and they should not be together
"Johnny could have kicked Amber on the flight right" "not that I recall", "so he could have killed Amber as well" . This is quite possibly the worst trial lawyer ever.
I agree! Her line of questions are ridiculous! “So he could have done this to Amber, right? “ you didn’t see any violence but he could have been, right?” That is like asking roses are red violets are blue but they could be pink and purple right? It’s stupid!
Especially since there’s nothing that can be known with 100% certainty when using this lawyers logic. For all anybody knows, Johnny could’ve stuck a swarm of hornets up Amber Heard’s ass, removed them and used a straw to spitball each one individually at her face for the duration of the flight. We weren’t there so how do you know that DIDNT happen?!
He's obviously being ver evasive because there's just too many things he can't recall. He's such a good friend of JD's that they often vacation together. He not going to rat him out, no way!
Cos the defendant has a weak claim, there's not enough information to defend her.. she could pick side information like verbal sparring and exchange of mutual insults or probe into whatever the witnesses said and try to uncover a bad side to it. Unfortunately for them, it uncovered info detrimental to her client.
The moment when it dawns on this witness that Johnny's been taking care of him for so long...you can literally see the second he realizes it. Can you even imagine? You're testifying in a case and suddenly you realize that one of the people in the case is actually probably one of the best people you've ever had in your life.
I cannot stand Heard’s lawyer. The woman treats witnesses and the other attorneys like annoying children. I suspect the jury is already sick of her BS and she hasn’t even started her case yet!
The lady for Heard is STUPID… not just this questioning but all her questioning, she is an embarrassment for all attorneys. I can’t believe she passed law school
Family court is the same, if not worst. Opinions are allowed as evidence. Facts are overlooked or dismissed. Anyone can lie under oath. Without consequences. It’s a joke. Johnny has cleared his name regardless of the outcome and I will never watch any film she is in.
THAT is what she is trying to show ...he doesn't know what he hasn't seen therefore what he says he has seen ...is not relevant...and proves NOTHING. There is also a way to paint a picture with questions ...and to make people think of possible answers and that is what she is doing.
@@silverkitty2503 Of course what people do see is still relevant. No witness is omnipotent or psychic, there will be limits to all witnesses. That does not mean that their testimony is worthless. Otherwise ALL witness testimony would be worthless lmao
@@kennikia2234 I went to law school....depp is losing because of a shitty legal team ..and i can see why he lost the uk trial ..a judge instructs a jury as to which paradigms or constraints along which they can give a verdict ..they are not allowed to to give a verdict based on who they think is the nicest person. A judge is going to come along and say ..yeah you have to ignore that and only return a verdict based within these rules ...his legal team is rubbish
@@silverkitty2503 thats ridiculous, if you're right you're just confirming what we all know... the legal system is a joke. Also why would you say you went to law school, rather than just say you're a lawyer. Did you not ever actually practice law?
I feel confident of 2 things after this trial. As a lawyer, she will have a significant pay cut moving forward IF she is ever hired again. She is absolute rubbish. She stumbles, asks irrelevant questions and you walk away wondering what the point was to her questions
Does this woman realize this man is just a witness and not there to be sentenced? And anyway, what does this all have to do with this case? It's total madness!
She’s going to say that they don’t recall anything in order to discredit them. Related or not doesn’t really matter. She is building a case to say JD’s witnesses are unreliable, that they are only remembering testimony against AH. She’s unpleasant for sure but she’s not quite as stupid as she seems.
Theyre trying to get witnesses to corroborate Ambers claims that Johnny beat her yelled at her abusively etc. They also at the beginning were using facts to place the witness with Johnny Depp so as to claim he MUST HAVE witnessed these events. Unfortunately the lawyer doesnt understand the film industry and how logistics works.
The projects and dates are to prove either Johnny’s career was either not effected by the claims or that he was ruining his own career. They seem to jump between the two narratives quite frequently.
@@RK-ej1to well that too kinda but more so to corroborate the events. Basically to beat defamation they just have to prove johnnys alleged abuse of Amber is true. But theyre also claiming theres no way someone could know the oped was talking about Johnny.....but one witness did question that saying "what other husband did she have?" That wasnt challeneged or stricken from the record. The jury will remember that
@@Jaac822 trying to establish that johnny and him are close, he should have seen these things, or that hes clearly biased towards johnnys largesse andnso wont tell the truth
Imagine being an “esteemed” lawyer representing a high profile celebrity client. And resorting to using tabloid news papers as “evidence” I love how he just laughs at her and says. I wouldn’t find this credible anyway
Immediately stricken down from the court transcript, BUT NOT FORM OUR MINDS. We all heard it, haha. And now it's on the internet. Also, it was stricken because it's an opinion and wasn't related to the question, but I'm pretty sure almost all of us agree with him!
The part of this trial is how JD position was destroyed by Amber. That's why they use those tabloids. Not as a source of truth. Just to show that he didn't have a perfectly clear account before the whole AH situation.
@@sebastian5742 oh well, or using the brain could it be that such newspapers wanted to do articles used to sell more at that time especially? You know, what kind of gossip is saying "he's a great actor"??? We need the "blood" the hard gossips and juicy lies or exaggerations here and there to be interested. This happens to anybody else in the world every single day... Not so hard to understand. 😉
*best quote from this witness: "the only reason I remember that flight is because Amber yelled at me." I'm catching up from this testimony 2 weeks ago. I'm curious what performance Amber is giving this Monday, May 16. This witness proves what a great guy Johnny Depp is. Amber's attorney came off as combative. She might watch too many fictional tv law and court programs.
That’s what I’ve been saying all along- she is coming off as the EXACT opposite of genuine. Real. Truthful. Honest. Etc. She needs to have some sense slapped into her (no pun intended). She needs to wake tf up and realize that the public isn’t half as dumb as she apparently believes them to be. And that life isn’t one big performance. It’s not a movie. She stinks of a false sense of superiority. As though she can just buy the best PR team and lawyers and it’ll all be good and she can continue on with her horrid people skills and awful self-serving habits.
That’s what’s so ridiculous! Like she’s watched too much Murder She Wrote - but I still don’t understand how that’s made her even more incompetent as an attorney... and somehow it clearly has😅 She amazes me, truly. It’s scary that Bredehof has any effect on people’s lives.
This attorney makes you really really really not like her. She’s unnecessarily aggressive and not doing her client any favors (not that anyone could do Amber any favors). Amber is going to have to pay this man!
I have been on the periphery of this case, but it has gotten under my skin and now I have it on, at least in the background, most of the day. Does Amber's $100 million counter suit have any merit?
alot of attorneys are not easily liked. But the question is: is this attorney effective? Its ok to not be liked if you are effective as an attorney. Most attorneys have many "enemies". But overall i feel like this attorney is not effective. ALso heard's male attorney on cross with JD did nothing but reference text messages the whole time and that seemedVERY ineffective. overall so far, not very effective cross from heard's attorneys
The fact this guy is in a contract tell =s us all not that he is a freaking madman, it tells us that this guy is one of the best sound men there are, and that he wasn't even aware that Johnny had secured his position on set. It tells us that Johnny truly appreciated the man's talents and work ethic, and experience. why is she asking him if Disney lost money because of Depp? He is a Sound Guy!
Not the best necessarily, but Depp trusts him and doesn't want to take a chance with someone else for sure. I work in the industry. Sometimes the most talented person is an a-hole that no one wants to work with.
@@AB-nb2ic I also work in the industry. I've never seen the contents of any other cast or crew members contract. Same goes with any occupation really. This lawyer could have asked questions that actually had relevance rather than wasting time.
A-Listers usually come with a list of crew that they want to work with. So for example a makeup artist might be hired for a film but on the days where the A Lister is working their own makeup artist will take over. This ensures their brand is consistent in terms of the quality of the makeup or whatever else is important to them
Which truth are you referring? He basically said that amber yelled at him, which she clearly doesn't have any right to given the fact that 1. He is not her staff and 2. He is not under her payroll. It only goes to show that Amber exhibit abusive behavior and can lash out to anyone she feels like. I will not be surprised that she's also capable of abusing Johnny Depp behind closed doors.
I don't know why I like his testimony so much. I think it's because he just seems so straightforward - mildly baffled by the statements the attorney keeps pressing upon him and just mildly stating and re-stating what he knows. At one point he can't help but laugh at the extreme statements Amber accuses JD of saying.
I was married to a drug addict for 7 years and never once did he lay a finger on me. Horrible line of questioning and ridiculous path for this attorney to take.
I too was married to an addict for close to 10 years ,we have children together. He unfortunately died of an overdose . He may have been loaded all the time but he never would have laid a hand on me or the children. He was a beautiful soul ♡
This lawyer is not good. She is grasping for straws and is leading the witness, along with phrasing so much as asked and answered that they would have to object to everything she asked. She also said the contract for Pirates of the Caribbean was dated 2022, not 2002. So for someone trying to be so specific, she is making mistakes in front of the jury.
The lawyer is harassing the witness. She's virtually attacking him about things he doesn't know anything about. She's trying to get him to answer questions regarding information to which he has no knowledge.
@@nealm6764 I genuinely do not understand how you can watch this trial so far and believe anything other than Johnny is a battered husband with a substance abuse problem, while Amber is a lying, manipulative, and violent partner that has already been arrested for domestic abuse of her previous spouse. Seriously, get real.
@@kennikia2234 The lawyers job is to do their best for their client, not cater to what RUclips commenters think. So while you have the luxury of gushing for charming Johnny and all of his sycophants that he surrounds himself with who will say anything to protect him, the lawyer doesn't have that luxury. This guy dated Johnny's sister who wrote/handled Johnny's contracts and he wants to pretend he doesn't know she was writing him into them? Come on.
This lady got stuck in the '90s, nobody does this kind of aggressive questioning anymore, and I'll add, this is literally the 'you can´t handle the truth' kind of vibes giving
I get that this lawyer is trying to rattle him because he’s doing great on the stand. However, she’s crossing lines. She makes him answer the same questions over, and she’s braiding him. Figures why she’s on Ambers team. They’re birds of a feather. Not impressed, and what part of he’s in a Union doesn’t she get. She’s trying to confuse the jury.
let her. She won't rattle anyone. She already looks like a total eejit about the makeup malarkey, and the "Amica" cream. Just wait till the Judge ends up having to hand down Judgment. Get snacks ready for the showdown.
@@gwendolynkaren5933 upbraiding that's a thing isn't it? I feel like she's badgering him a a whole lot implying getting nice lodging for work means that he's paid off. She's working the jury.
Absolutely disgusting how she is treating this poor man. Where is she getting this information from the question the witness. How can this be allowed to carry on? Farcical
But everyone IS LEARNING that Dep is frequently very drunk! And they ARE learning that Dep's "FRIENDS" are really paid employees.... (rolling eye emoji)
All this is proving is how good Johnny treats his friends, he's a reserved guy but he's also a ''make my table longer, not shorter'' kind of guy. Imagine being worked into a actor friends contract to be THEIR expert in an area, guaranteeing you a decent living. Same with his artist buddy he gave a penthouse and gave money while he built himself up doing what he loved. Johnny is a damn legend.
@@helenbaker1117 That's not true. Most judges will not allow lawyers to be hostile to witnesses. WITNESSES being the operative word. Witnesses are not on trial.
This attorney sounds like she's fed up with this case. Doesn't she know she's throwing her career out the window? She must by her tone and how she is going in circles. She sounds like she's going to need psychological help after this case.
Sounds like this lady is constantly trying to bully the judge or other lawyers in a passive aggressive way to allow her to continue her waste of time line of questioning.
Yes. She was aggressive just to sway the jury-cortroom, is my guess. Made me ask the reason to the questioning in the first place. This is a show of good lawyers vs horrible lawyers.
Holy crap the Lawyer's questioning has it's own psycho mood swings. Why is she asking that Sound Technition any of these questions? Is she going to question everyone from on sets, the same bulldoggish way?!
I think she is trying to paint a picture of Johnny. She is trying to make him seem like a guy who is intoxicated, one way or another, all of the time and because people dont actually see it, they cannot testify as to if he was or wasnt to depict Johnny as a belligerent drunk/drug user. Sad to see this but it is actually better for Johnny because her questions are getting the same answers from every person.
@@lindasmith1105 Bro I burst out laughing when she asked him if he had known of any violence between Johnny and another woman WHEN HE WASN'T THERE!!!! That was hilarious
I love how all of her questions trying to frame this guy as unreliable, due to favoritism towards Johnny, completely backfire on her. Dude was getting perks from Johnny he didn’t even know about, and relaxing in nice hotels because everyone on Johnny’s crew stayed in nice hotels… just proves how awesome Johnny is. 😂
The Nasty: It is very telling that you are not able to write the word 'man' and 'he' and you use immature alternatives. Yet you are able to bring yourself to write the word "she". Quite probably you have the same mental struggle to say the word "man". This may demonstrate that you have a subconscious problem in recognising the witness is actually - A MAN. Hmm... very interesting.
Wtf is up with this “judge” she always allows ambers attorney questions to continue but when they object Johnny’s attorney she stops the questions and interrupt them
I’ve been thinking the same thing; been trying to figure out why this witness is allowed to answer most of the defendant’s attorney questions about hearsay (except one maybe)but when the Witnesses for Mr. Depp are being questioned by his attorney the witnesses are shut down & aren’t allowed to answer because it’s “hearsay”(esp his security guard). Seems kinda off balanced to me.🤔
This lawyer is hilariously terrible. If courtroom procedurals have taught us anything, it's that asking questions you don't already know the answer to is the cardinal sin of a trial lawyer because you end up scoring own goals for the other side. You'd think with all the money involved that Amber Heard could have retained a decent legal team, but this woman is embarrassing.😂
Wait until we hopefully hear and see the jury’s reaction when she made herself and her team look ridiculous when she stated that Amber used a specific” make up “that wasn’t even made until 2017 and they got divorced at 2016🤣
attorney is helping the other side! Can't believe the judge is allowing us. We all hear all kinds of things that are rumors or whatever about third parties we don't know. She's trying to force it that if he didn't see it it doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's almost like she's trying to plant seeds in minds of the jurors that it did happen he just didn't see it. That is insane-- what else is he supposed to say? It blows my mind that this is an American Court. I would call this witness badgering.
The way this attorney literally mocks Depp’s lawyer almost every time he brings up an objection is so disgraceful. I don’t think I saw any of Depp’s team loudly borderline insulting Rottenburn when he kept repeating hearsay like the minions repeating banana over and over.
I don't know what's worse a sneaky snake ass B or a B trying with all her heart trying to be a sneaky snake ass b this lady ask and ask questions doesn't listen to the answers yet twist everything everybody says ask the same question over and over dumb ass questions at that Like when she says you don't know for sure that he didn't hit her because you weren't there I would have said I also don't know that he didn't give her a big hug a sloppy kiss and a stack of cash i wasnt there
I have court next week . I tend to talk a lot , only the truth and I must do what he is doing or the judge will get angry with me . Now I get it ! He is the Bomb ! Anyone else have any links to help ? Please ? Custody case .
Is “badgering the witness” even a real thing or is that just in the movIes? Cause holy crap she’s treating him as if he’s the one on trial! What a terrible lawyer.
@@k.hendrickson8735 Amber’s friends were toadies who had nothing to lose because they were ALL losers who depended on Amber funneling them financial support via Johnny. They lied to help Amber and now they are lying to protect themselves from the consequences of lying about Johnny and helping her evil plan.
This Lawyer sure makes me understand why ppl would answer, "I don't recall", "I don't know", "I don't remember". She seems more like she badgering the witness, needlessly.
Wow this attorney is treating this witness as hostile!! I can't believe the judge is allowing this. This attorney is badgering him!! Her questions are repetitive and she is trying desperately to find some fault in his answers. She did more harm than good for her client.
@@ThePaintedHope You've got to be kidding me! It's plain as day she is badgering the witness and asking argumentive questions. Appearintly 27 people disagree with you as I write this. And it's not about me being biased which btw I am not, but about truth.
@@tammywebb7521 I too am biased, in the same direction I might add. The lawyers behaviour here is fairly ordinary seeing the circumstances. People agreeing with you doesn't make anything less or more true.
@@ThePaintedHope lmao yeah maybe if it she was cross examining a liar who was giving an alibi for a suspected murderer. Lol, the over reaction was a bit too much.
I feel so sorry for the witnesses and how this attorney just harasses them. I hope Johnny wins and this attorney loses their license. This is beyond harassment
Ave Maajra I agree she’s is trying to make a mark for herself JD have being doing his work for years Women’s like that make man afraid of getting into real relationship because they’re afraid, where is she going there trying under mine the witness why did he marriage her at all did he say the trouble and her behaviour
This lawyer is constantly testifying herself by making statements and then just asking the witness "did you know that?" Their answer is often "no". How is that even allowed?!
I agree... she asks questions that sound more like statements and she doesn't wait for an answer because she doesn't really want one... she just wants the jury to hear what she says so she can manipulate them into accepting her version as truth.
You are so right! Usually when people ask questions they start with "do you, did you, were you etc". But she makes statements masquerading as questions
You have to understand that she is looking to catch someone in a lie or fraud so they can use that. She is just defending Amber by asking any stupid questions because they have nothing on Johnny.
Many of her questions, are not questions, but accusations that literally end with the phrase “didn’t you!?” Not to mention that the answer to almost all of them is “No, … I didn’t.” Does this lady have any concept of what it means for a jury to find you unlikeable?
This witness seems to be so gentle, kind and well behaved. I don’t have that much experience, but I’ve followed and studied cases and never in my life would I imagine to hear such an idiot interrogatoire from a lawyer. This woman is ridiculous!
Mind Numbing in it's stupidity. Presses hard that he can't know what goes on with JD & AH behind closed doors and then when said he might have left plane before either of them she presses him to speculate that Johnny could have passed out and could have kicked Amber. And took her 25 minutes to finally hear him saying 'I don't know. Insanely duplicitous! And her insinuations are so out of line.
“Did Mr. Bailey collaborate on any projects with Mr. Depo after pirate’s 5.” Yes, he did on the Disney promotion. “But was it a feature film?” This lawyer is an absolute idiot. 😂
The first ten minutes is spent proving Johnny Depp makes sure the people the work on his films are well taken care of by incorporating it into his contracts. Oh no. How terrible. 🙄
Surely then the angle is to try to convince people that he probably knows Johnny Depp looks after him - to the point of including him in his own contract - so next it could be implied that he is obviously biased in favour of his employer and friend, presumably to follow on to casting aspersions about potential for dishonesty or being hostage to loyalty or other incentives.
Right? What a prick, paying all his staff and taking care of them! Oh no....how AWFUL! Bwahahaha. This case is insane. Johnny wins by public support alone.
My god. How is portraying Johnny Depp as a star who's totally loyal to his people to the point he makes sure they're taken care of in his own contracts without them even knowing about it advantageous to Amber Heard's case?
She's perhaps trying to make it look like depp has purchased the loyalty of his friends and colleagues...that way they would have a reason to be loyal to him and support his testimony
Because if Johnny surrounds himself by enablers of his using through contractual negotiation, then he is in part responsible for creating a dysfunctional relationship in which Amber is often a mutual victim of dysfunction.
After this fiasco, I don't see how ANYONE would want to hire this "lawyer" for themselves. Really, no one in their right minds, would want to retain this lady as their lawyer, after seeing/hearing this trial.
@@anoaq6978 perhaps you have missed parts of this trial? Amber's lawyers are not doing their jobs lol. - They didn't properly research, one of her lawyers had objected with a "heresay" on his OWN questioning 🤦🏻♀️. - The other lawyer of Amber's, didn't seem to know his laws, and straight out argued that throwing objects (such as a big glass bottle) which ended up causing bodily harm, is not an assault 🤣. - gets witnesses names wrong lol - Amber's head lawyer accused the Judge, calling the Judge biased. And I'm not even gonna go into details regarding the makeup product that her lawyer claims Amber had to rely on, for over a year. - As a criminal lawyer, a big part of their job, is to know how to limit the questionings. How to phrase the questions so that the witnesses answers would be short, to the point, not allowing witnesses of opposing team to be able to elaborate, or draw out their answers, that may lead to these lawyers having to object every reply that comes out of witnesses mouths. So far, Amber's lawyers have not been doing their jobs as defense attorneys. They have not been able to paint their client in a better light.
@@yorkiesweetpea23 It's sad yet funny how they're trying so hard to smear Depp's name and say things like "WELL JOHNNY DOES DRUGS" as if that's an excuse or explicitly makes somebody evil. They can't simply clear her name, because they have absolutely nothing to go on since she's a textbook narcissistic manipulator.
I can't imagine what it must be like being questioned by this lawyer.Her repetive questions when the witness has already given their answer is difficult to listen to, frequently the witness seems to turn to the judge in confusion .
I have never been a witness but my ex-wife was once. She said its a terrible experience. The attorney mocked her, ridiculed her education, implied she was incompetent, and asked misleading questions. You can't answer the way you want. Afterwards she felt brutalized and slandered, and that she did a bad job on the stand...even though according to her client's attorney she was great. Her client won the case, but she said it was the worst experience she ever had.
@@ritasnow8319 I think this witness did it perfectly. Just answer the questions, no matter how dumb. Think about your answers, don't get tricked into making a mistake, stick to the truth and keep your sense of humor. Ultimately he was there for Johnny, and did a good job. Trying to spar with the attorney is what they want. It makes you look bad.
How in the world is the judge allowing the lawyer to enter evidence? “Have you heard of Greg accusing JD of attacking him?” She may as well ask, “ have you ever heard of Sally, Cindy and Susie accusing him of attacking him?”
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
As a trial lawyer (25 years of experience) I say this lady is one of the worst lawyers I have ever heard conducting examination of a witness.
My Mother in law is a trial lawyer and said the same exact thing.
As a non lawyer im highly irritated by these repeated questions, this is like 5 year old keeps asking you same question over and over again because he is bored.
Did she say someone accused Johnny of punching someone?..?
Never heard of that!
@@Melinda8162 there was allegedly a man *picking* on a homeless woman on a set... Johnny allegedly set him straight 😏
Dam...
Imagine finding out 20 years later that your friend had your back the entire time and you had no clue you were significant enough to him that he made sure you were taking care of the whole time without your knowledge. Damn good friend
Its also possible this witness is smart enough to derail this line of interrogation by stating he doesn't know. Technically no one can disprove his "ignorance". Shrewd, is how his response strikes me. People are willing to go the extra mile for JD - obviously he's well liked & his easy-going generosity is legendary.
@@sofyabet66 seriously? You just called the man a liar for saying he doesn't remember the fairy tales Amber has concocted.
@@sweetpea4967 actually I just called him smart for sidestepping this BS line of interrogation- much of which attempted to paint him as someone beholden to JD
That's how l view it too ,he is well aware that he had his back all along
Yeah, it defies reality. If it didn't matter he wouldn't be in the contract.
"Did you see any pigs fly?"
"No"
"So there could have been pigs flying?"
"Not that I recall."
OMG I laughed for 5 minutes at this.
This is hilariously summing up the whole video. Bravo!
Perfect!! 😂😂🤣🤣
😂😂😂
"But you saw that pigs fly, correct?"
This witness seems like such a chill guy, I feel bad for him to have to put up with this horrible woman
I think he's good looking. 👌
@@YA-qj8fx that too!
@@YA-qj8fx the man has aged like a mega pint of fine wine
Do you guys even know who Marilyn Manson is?
LMAO I CANT STOP LAUGHING THIS CHILL GUY GOOD ONE AND HORRIBLE WOMAN LOL
This Judge sure is allowing a great deal of bs from this attorney.
I was thinking the same!
Agree this lawyer is so rude unprofessional
Exactly! And she didn’t allow simple questions from Johnny attorney to Johnny so crazy!
I mean look at the genderless weirdo, what did you expect.
Agreed!
This is crazy. All I can say is, this dude has true friends. It seems she is the aggressor. And he is the submissive/introvert. But, when your friends love you, it shows something.
Or maybe is because she is the aggressor and everyone else knows!
Especially if you pay them. Or benefit them in some way.
@@charlottecannon314 These true friends are not allowed in court :p
I'd like the hear from Amber's "friends"
Well said
She’s a terrible attorney fighting a losing case. I’m embarrassed for her. I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!
To be fair, I wouldn't say she's a terrible attorney. She and the rest of the legal team are trying to make as strong of an argument as possible while having really shitty situation on their hand. It's not a case if you want an easy win, but intead it's a case where everyone is getting a huge paycheck for trying - because regardless of the outcome someone's going to cover the legal expenses 100%.
With all of this going down I think they're doing their best to not look like complete fools in court, which is a challenge of it's own considering what they have to work with, and present with a straight face.
I don’t know the ages of the commentators here. BuI am old enough to remember the damage to property, the bloody fights between him and the model Kate Moss for a long time before he met Ms Parisi. There were other women, but back in the day the “Me Too” movement was just wishful thinking and we women were silent. We all saw how rape victims were treated in court. If a woman dare to bring her case to court more than not Women were discouraged by police and others to drop charges. I love Mr. Depp’s work and I want to see more of it. But his reputation as a drinker and drug user has always been an open secret in Hollywood. He is a heavy drinker and passes out. People who drink heavily can become quiet or mean. They can be physical too. I’m not saying anything people who deal with heavy drinkers don’t know. She has a lot of issues too. I think this is mostly very sad. I know women love him but he’s putting on a good performance and he’s a great actor, remember that. She didn’t ruin his career she just gave the studios another reason to not work with him because of his erratic behavior on set and the money it cost them to delay the picture. While he was with Ms Parisi, he was so much better and in a good place. If he really wants to work he can do what a lot of actors are doing. He has the money to be the producer of independent films and he can get good people and good writers and he has fans who will come to see him. He needs to take responsibility for his behavior and why studios don’t want to work with him. Word of mouth and losing money travel fast in Hollywood. This woman fought back. Most women do nowadays and they have the support women like me; your mothers, grandmas,aunts, didn’t have back in the day.I love the phrase, “I don’t remember”, excellently coached by lawyers to not lie on the stand, but to evade.
I don't think she's terrible, he's a solid witness though.
"I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!" She could be a lesbian?
I'm only 13 minutes into this but I don't see any benefit or detriment to this attorney's questioning. What does it have to do with anything? It seems like a big waste of time.
I had forgotten how NASTY ELAINE was and how she put in statements that she knew would be rightfully objected to. She didn’t care as long as the Judge was cool and the jury had heard it. She went DIRTY to try to win this case even if she had to throw innuendos and fecal material at decent people in the process. I hope she loses the case just like she lost her integrity and human decency.
She has to be seen to do work to earn her hourly rate. I wonder if she has an online law degree…
The way Amber’s attorney is behaving should be illegal. Literally putting words into the witnesses mouth and not giving him a chance to answer the question. Even if he says no, she badgers him trying to get him to change the answer. It’s disgusting.
Lol you are describing cross-examination. The whole point is to badger someone into saying what you want them to say. She was pretty clunky though, and talking over the answers was not good.
She is annoying to us. She will also be annoying to the jury. It will not bode well for Amber. Good.
@@davidthompson1529 Agree, and she seems to allow far fewer objections than from Johnny's legal team yesterday.
It’s actually a pretty good indicator of desperation. Yea, there’s value in getting a witness to break down on the stand or badger them to get them to lose their cool. But if you have a true and compelling argument I think a good attorney can just use the truth to destroy witnesses.
I agree, I think Amber's team has too much on their hands trying to defend that woman. She's guilty as sin. You can tell by the way the attorneys behave, they have nothing so they try to make something out of nothing.
Geez this lawyer is so annoying. Let him finish his answer!
I totally agree!
Just trying to get any info she can to catch him in something totfaly honest and flip it, shes a losing lawyer trying anything
Yes she is . 🤬🤬🤬
She s trying to stop the flow of questions every minute cos she knows she wont like the answers coming in johnnys favour
Judge should be firm with her constant talking over witness and interrupting him. Depp's attorney should be objecting to that kind of rudeness and unprofessional behavior.
Guys, I am not a lawyer, but it seems like 80% of the questions she asked him had no relevance to the abuses and fights. Why was she allowed to go on with it?
It is relevant, it's shows that he makes money from Jonny so his statement may be bais
Maybe to make the lawyer look like an a$$ and make him more likable?
To paint Depp in bad light and give him less credibility
@@lightinthedusk wait WHAT!? She had a relationship of some sort with the judge?
@@dragonlady3278 the judge was involved with her lawyer all entangled with the me too movement.. popcorn planet on youtube has the details
5 minutes in and all she's proven is that johnny is so generous and kind and genuinely wants the best for the people he loves and tries his best to help them lmao 🤣
It seems like she was trying to prove that Wyatt was somehow beholden to Depp or had been bought somehow. I don't think it ever occurred to her that the contract clauses were acts of pure generosity.
Ya, that sure backfired on her! Loved every minute of it. She is so rude!
I genuinely don't understand the point though. If he was being paid the Union Minimum, as he here testified several times, how is Johnny being 'generous' by having that written into his contract, which Elaine alleges (without proving) several times? Why is the Union Minimum so freaking "generous"? What is her point, what the hell is she trying to prove with this? I hope the jury is not as confused and dizzy as I feel right now. Why does Elaine think it's so extraordinary, perhaps corrupt, that his hotel was paid for? Does she think think people performing important jobs on movie sets pay for their own location accommodations, so that all professionals can only afford to work in their own hometowns? (She might be completely 100% shielded, like Dr. Spiegel, from all information about acting, and does not even know these people might be caught rehearsing.)
What do you mean "generous"? Yes, of course, normally he is to a fault, but I do not see that here in anything Elaine has obtained, I am just confused - he's getting Union minimum for God's sake!
It's about the fact that johnny puts him in his contract and so giving him work opportunities, and she's trying to prove he also asks to give him nice hotels and other privileges, and by that proves that he is a paid witness ''on his pay rolls like they liked to say
Awful attorney. You can tell she’s desperate
No she’s doomed!!! So is that ex
Lol you know he just got caught lying, unfortunately this guy gave a stronger case for amber
@@lezamac6 100% disagree. This witness comes across as very truthful, likeable and undeserving of being aggressively questioned in this manner. This entire cross comes across as desperate. She didn't do herself any favors.
Yes, she is asking questions that have really nothing to do with him abusing her. Amber has already admitted to hitting him on tape, who is the abuser here?
What an awful interrogation. This is almost abuse in itself. On top of it all this lawyer does not even seem to understand the film industry. Horrific.
It's just mediocre cross-examination - go into any courtroom any day of the week and you will see something similar going on lol
There is a presiding Judge, if it was abuse she would stop the so called interrogation, it's cross examination and designed to help people who have bad memories recall what happened.
I thought this witness was so cool.
You sound so naive… “abuse” 🤣🤣🤣
@@whitneyangelie3682 While I wouldn’t use the word ‘abuse’ to describe their motives/wording, but it is most definitely textbook manipulation to get a witness to try to come to the same delusional portrayal that they came up with.
Imagine just thinking that you're good friends with Depp but he's been looking after you and other crews all these years. Really goes to show how he just wants to help without feeling the need to fuel his ego.
He's a beautiful, gentle, giving man. Johnny forever. ❤️
That has NOTHING to do with the actual defamation case though. I don't see it that way AT ALL. I see this EMPLOYEE of Dep's is typical of Hollyweird "Friendships". They barter EVERYTHING - and EVERYTHING is in exchange for something....
@@k.hendrickson8735 Ok, bye!
And this was essentially done anonymously; Wyatt had no idea that Depp had included him in his contracts.
Must be weird getting rich for being yourself in the public eye for years
Well done to this witness for staying completely calm throughout this stupid attorney’s barrage.
I agree. I don't think i could be so calm. Why did she even ask this guy all those questions they were for other people not even for him.. IMO
Basically, all this horrible attorney proved, was that Johnny is an even greater man & employer than this guy thought. He treats ALL of his employees, and everyone around him very well.
Amen!!!
Exactly Lol and the funny thing is she thinks she doing a good job
@@thenecessarynews9371 TRUTH! Her facial expressions say it all. She is wacko!
Smart man takes care of his friends, his friend will take care of him. We just don't know how truthful these testimonies are that we're hearing here. Could they be perjuring themselves for Johnny Depp? If he falls, they fall. If he doesn't work, they don't get paid.
Because Johnny surrounds himself with enablers of his drug use, through even long-standing contractual agreements (ensuring subsequent productions hire certain personnel who happen to be enablers). This power structure helps to compare the levels of control over the dysfunctional relationship between he and Amber. Furthermore, does Johnny’s using adversely affect his reliability as a victim of ‘Amber as sole abuser.’ Clearly, it was sadly a dysfunctional marriage largely in part due to the bubble of substance abuse in which toxicity was maintained, and if Johnny’s using was often an impetus of dysfunction, then Amber’s defense has a valid foundation of argument.
This woman is awful. She's clearly trying to lead the witness and is failing miserably. I can't believe this judge allowed her to badger the witness like this. How appalling and pathetic.
right just thinking the same, America seems terrible corruption.
That is her job. She is trying to extract information in a way that supports Heard's defense. Maybe you can critique her style and effectiveness, but saying, "[she] needs to be fired" is ridiculous. Heard's position is losing from the start, so of course, her defense will try to grab the smallest of leads to persuade the jury.
@@NoobGaming-cv6bp There is corruption, but so far, this trial is absent of it.
Stop gaming, and learn to put a thought together.
It's cringe
What’s crazy is you can tell he’s actually surprised Johnny made sure he was in his personal contracts to make sure he was absolutely secured everything he would need even if the other company’s had any kind of mess up Johnny would use his own contract to make sure he’s secured that’s one hell of a good friend.
I agree with that for sure!
Stop Over rated Johnny Depp is No Angel! He verbal abuse and did drugs! Just ignoring that! Wow 😒
What I don't understand is how the judge allowed her lawyer to press him about Depp's contracts. It's beyond hearsay. He has no way of knowing yet the judge allowed it.
Why does this judge allow anything to fly from her lawyers?
All my dogs gone eat. Johnny fed his people
This "attorney" is pathetic. Asked 25 times if he was drunk or high in different ways. Gets the same answer every time and ignores the answers.
„Did he take any Red Bulls?“
…Whisky? Vodka? Champagne? Or maybe Gin? But what is about Rum? 😂
Somebody shut her lawyer up. She's just as sleezy as Amber.
Her lawyer is just like Amber.
literally. like how did amber hire the most annoying lawyers ever?
I would never want to be around these two woman. Unbearable
It must be narcissist Aunt that's her lawyer.
Lol
I love this witness, he stands up to this attorney. And she makes herself look bad. As a lawyer , she is badgering the witness.
But, she is making herself look terrible to the jurors. Johnny, looking good.
she doesn't seem bright. Comes across as an auld fart too. AH reckoned she'd coast through this pile of steaming lies. She was mistaken.
Is this the same “amica” cream lawyer ?
@@therealdiegoalunan Yes
Amica cream 🤦♀️ 🤣🤣 How long did that go on for?!
He missed work because your psycho client severed his finger. And it got infected
She is quite possibly the worst attorney I’ve ever witnessed.
They are bullies all of her attorneys
But you have witnessed her...
Johnny deserves his life, career and reputation restored. Justice for Johnny!
The world stands with you!
I believe that Amber's female lawyer's behavior verging on abusive doesn't help her. I almost feel attacked just listening.
I'm literally feeling it viscerally
Same!
Hah I feel traumatized listening to her lascivious comments involving James Franco. She’s bossy and disgusting
She’s so annoying
If y’all wanna palate cleanser, I recommend watching the video of Amber‘s former assistant. It’s the male lawyer but he tries to badger her as well but she’s not having it. She’s my new favorite person.
It is a shame only those testifying can be treated as "hostile" and not the lawyers themselves. Why the judge didn't tell this lawyer to move on is beyond common sense.
Because the judge is obviously a man hater and probably prefers women if ya get my drift.
That’s the whole system of English Law? It’s the only workable approach. Lawyers aren’t in court to be cross examined? They are there to expose the evidence and the facts.
Depends on you pov. They are there to "guide" the "truth" in a certain direction
He doesn’t know what he makes re: salary? Please, we all know what we make. This guy doesn’t recall much. Does he have dementia?
I saw no hostility in this questioning. And clearly the witness had no problem with the questions.
Everyone keeps talking about Amber's attorney in this comment section but this judge is absolutely horrid to allow her to continue this line of questioning.
Agree 100%
She was trying to discredit him - repeatedly ask him a bunch of mostly irrelevant questions about people dates, events, etc., trying to catch him up. Suffice it to say, it backfired hugely. This guy's solid and the lawyer looked ridiculous.
Judge seem bias towards Amber's side.
She looks like she has a whole room in her house dedicated to hating men.
No they should keep letting them talk because all they're doing is making themselves look retarded.
This lawyer's logic is so flawed. "You didn't see it happen so it could have still happened and no one saw" yeah and Johnny Depp could have preformed open heart surgery on the back of the plane. You just didn't see it,
This “lawyer” is an embarrassment to the legal profession…..
Unfortunately every lawyer I’ve been against in court behaves this way I can’t figure out why my attorneys aren’t this aggressive.
@@yourmomshouse8993 what were you in court for? (I’m curious not a cop)
Yep 👍
@@yourmomshouse8993 because you pay them very little. Pay them a few 100k. They'll fight for you then.
@@jonahjameson8224 I agree with what you’re saying but if I tell you I’ve paid them a few 100k would you believe me? I think it’s a very dirty world but honestly I’m considering going to law school so I can defend myself going forward.
This lawyer makes me cringe with every question. Let the guy speak, and try not to sound like you want to leap the stand and attack him please.
She's trying unsuccessfully to pull a Juan Martinez here. 🤣
Usually, the defense's attorneys try not to be confrontational with the plaintiff's witnesses because it makes the jury dislike them. She's doing a good job of being dislikeable.
this lawyer is terrible, feels like she is bullying the poor guy
I know! She's beyond rude.
... and you were lodged in a Hotel, not a shack or a kennel, ... that's suspicious...
Ambers attorney imo was badgering this witness with questions that are irrelevant to the case. What does his earned income have to do with anything?
They are trying to focus/distract the jury with other crap. This cross examiner is terrible! She sinking the team with her stupid questions.
Yes she is badgering the witness! 💯 Judge what does this have to do with the case really he also made it clear they're good friends what the hell! Does this have to do with abuse or the case at all! 🤬
Right?! "You're aware that Mr. Depp has put you in to his contracts, correct?!" Yeah, so TF what, Good God...
Badgering - Exactly.
I see it as they are trying to get him to admit johnny is incompetent, I feel that's the narrative they are going with, a guy forgets lines etc, but all have said positive things about him. They are asking about his income to prove he is beholden to Johnny and to paint him as not a credible witness.
Lawyer: "Do you know the details about a wedding that you never attended!!!?"
Witness: "no, I don't"
There's another one. I don't know what the question was, but the answer from the wintness:"After I left I wasn't there, that's correct!" referring to seeing something that would be in favor of AH.
😂
“You don’t know what happens behind closed doors… DO YOU?”
*no one does… this is ridiculous*
Reading all these comments, this one for some reason made me laugh out loud, truly. It’s exactly how she sounds!
She is ridiculous in general.
“You don’t know what happens behind closed doors… DO YOU?”
"No."
"So then do you know what happened behind THESE closed doors?"
"Still no"
"How about THESE closed doors?"
"Still no."
"Okay, and how about THEEEESSSEE closed doors?"
"Your Honor, objection, ridiculous"
"I'll allow it"
"DO YOU?"
"Still no."
"ok and then so what about THESE closed doors???????"
and there're Johnny and Amber's friends living behind closed doors with them but they also saw nothing.
Sometimes you hear stuff...
This is a true Gentleman and a friend.
He comes across very credible.
@x x I've watched his full testimony twice. What did she expose?
This judge is useless at controlling her court room.
Agree
The judge seems to be on Amber's side. 😤
Example: Eve Barlow
This judge should excuse herself due to her bias towards the turd
This line of questioning is absurd. Every actor has people they like to work with regularly, and all the production staff on a movie are in hotels.
Yes and that woman AH has no shame IMO
This attorney is so frustrating. Why is the judge allowing her to attack the witnesses over questions that are almost irrelevant?
Maybe the judge is allowing the defence to hang itself in the eyes of the jury...?
@@jasonr5989 Valid point!
Judges put their fingers on the scale
I have been sussing this judge since day 1 with the first witness she seems bias to Amber's side. These questions though and if the witness does not give her the answer she wants them to she strikes it so why ask the question in the first place? unlike her client some people actually prefer telling the truth on that stand
Right!!
Why is this Judge allowing such repetitive, questions, over and over. Just to confuse the jurors? The Attorney is ridiculous. How can he answer questions about things he wasn’t privy to. Just a ridiculous waste of time.
Agreed
This lawyer is so disrespectful to the judge! She does not even wait for her to react to the objections raised. She just steamroller on! The judge should not allow this bullying from her!
Im hoping that it will be so that if he wins, there can be little to no challenge later. Give her side everything they ask. Good judges, if she transpires to be 1 of them, also have strategy and foresight
Was wondering the same thing. What an idiot prosecutor. Clearly low IQ who just scraped thru the bar and deserves to go to jail for lowering American IQ.
She's sooo annoying
I really like this person. He puts up with the hassling and repetition and deliberately confusing nonsense so politely and coolie. Makes the lawyer look like a desperate arse.
that's because she is ! Well put.
me too. what a cool dude. showed the lawyer up, that’s for sure. she’s incompetent! asking the most ridiculous and irrelevant questions! the judge is not much better, letting her witter on and harassing a perfectly innocent witness! I’m quite shocked. leading the witness etc. Disgraceful.
*witter on?
This lawyer can’t help herself , she’s Condescending and Rude when there’s absolutely no need for it , all she does is make herself sound combative towards witnesses and has no basis for half her questions, they already can’t stand her client , she should try being polite and less nasty cause all it does is reflect back to her Client, this dude isn’t a witness where u gotta be aggressive with , her overall TONE speaks for Ambers personality - NASTY
You rang?
@@The.Nasty.
I
@@The.Nasty. I spat out my cider when I read that. Honest to god LOL
@@JelloTypeR 😂
This judge is so bias it’s embarrassing that she’s not even trying to hide it
Looks like amber’s gonna win this if it was up to the judge. Sickening 😤
@@whitehouse9999 Amber is a psychopath
defamation lawsuits are always difficult to pull through. That ain't actually a bias, unless you can provide specific examples. And even if Johnny prevails, he won't get even close to the money he wants. And before you say that I'm on Amber's side here...I'm not. Actually rooting for Johnny, but unfortunately manipulative narcissists get off extremely easy in US courts.
@@Raussl I completely agree. All the defense needs to do is show clear and convincing evidence that what Amber quoted in that article wasn't libel. I wonder when she takes the stand she will try to claim it wasn't about Depp.
@@bonniehowell9206 I think they have it with the kitchen cabinet slamming video. No excuse for that. Most comments are making the excuse that his mother just died and he just found out he was getting robbed. I would not live with the person who behaved that way. And I’m sure it wasn’t the first time. They are both sick people and the whole thing should be dropped and they should not be together
"Johnny could have kicked Amber on the flight right" "not that I recall", "so he could have killed Amber as well" . This is quite possibly the worst trial lawyer ever.
I agree! Her line of questions are ridiculous! “So he could have done this to Amber, right? “ you didn’t see any violence but he could have been, right?” That is like asking roses are red violets are blue but they could be pink and purple right? It’s stupid!
This lawyer could have kicked Amber on the flight.
Especially since there’s nothing that can be known with 100% certainty when using this lawyers logic. For all anybody knows, Johnny could’ve stuck a swarm of hornets up Amber Heard’s ass, removed them and used a straw to spitball each one individually at her face for the duration of the flight. We weren’t there so how do you know that DIDNT happen?!
He's obviously being ver evasive because there's just too many things he can't recall. He's such a good friend of JD's that they often vacation together. He not going to rat him out, no way!
This lawyer is hurting her client’s case, in my opinion. Given the fact that her client, is Amber, I’m not too sad about it.
I feel bad for her, until I remember that Amber deserves ALL OF THIS.
Cos the defendant has a weak claim, there's not enough information to defend her.. she could pick side information like verbal sparring and exchange of mutual insults or probe into whatever the witnesses said and try to uncover a bad side to it. Unfortunately for them, it uncovered info detrimental to her client.
I just saw this on the news that the last time we we
Lol.. Totally agree !!!
Heard's attorney's know they have a weak defense, so it seems their main tactic is to work hard to impeach Depp's witnesses.
The moment when it dawns on this witness that Johnny's been taking care of him for so long...you can literally see the second he realizes it. Can you even imagine? You're testifying in a case and suddenly you realize that one of the people in the case is actually probably one of the best people you've ever had in your life.
I cannot stand Heard’s lawyer. The woman treats witnesses and the other attorneys like annoying children. I suspect the jury is already sick of her BS and she hasn’t even started her case yet!
She likes saying nasty words.
The lady for Heard is STUPID… not just this questioning but all her questioning, she is an embarrassment for all attorneys. I can’t believe she passed law school
how is that? what trial were you watching
the guy is clearly withholding truth
he is not being completely honest so she is pushing for answers
How come no one is stopping grandma lawyer from blabbing
JUSTICE FOR THE JURY AND EVERYONE IN COURT FOR TORTURE
HOW THE JUDGE ALLOWS THIS CRAP TO CONTINUE IS STARTLING.
I agree
I agree! The judge seems incompetent also.
Family court is the same, if not worst. Opinions are allowed as evidence. Facts are overlooked or dismissed. Anyone can lie under oath. Without consequences. It’s a joke. Johnny has cleared his name regardless of the outcome and I will never watch any film she is in.
She let's Heard's lawyers make asses of themselves.
She must have fallen asleep listening to the same and illogical questions
This lawyer is a joke. OBVIOUSLY, he doesn't know what happened when he wasn't there. So, she proved the sound guy isn't a psychic.....
THAT is what she is trying to show ...he doesn't know what he hasn't seen therefore what he says he has seen ...is not relevant...and proves NOTHING. There is also a way to paint a picture with questions ...and to make people think of possible answers and that is what she is doing.
😅🤣
@@silverkitty2503 Of course what people do see is still relevant. No witness is omnipotent or psychic, there will be limits to all witnesses. That does not mean that their testimony is worthless. Otherwise ALL witness testimony would be worthless lmao
@@kennikia2234 I went to law school....depp is losing because of a shitty legal team ..and i can see why he lost the uk trial ..a judge instructs a jury as to which paradigms or constraints along which they can give a verdict ..they are not allowed to to give a verdict based on who they think is the nicest person. A judge is going to come along and say ..yeah you have to ignore that and only return a verdict based within these rules ...his legal team is rubbish
@@silverkitty2503 thats ridiculous, if you're right you're just confirming what we all know... the legal system is a joke. Also why would you say you went to law school, rather than just say you're a lawyer. Did you not ever actually practice law?
I feel confident of 2 things after this trial. As a lawyer, she will have a significant pay cut moving forward IF she is ever hired again. She is absolute rubbish. She stumbles, asks irrelevant questions and you walk away wondering what the point was to her questions
What was the 2nd thing?
What was the purpose of these questions 🤔
The ones elaine was asking
Does this woman realize this man is just a witness and not there to be sentenced? And anyway, what does this all have to do with this case? It's total madness!
She’s going to say that they don’t recall anything in order to discredit them. Related or not doesn’t really matter. She is building a case to say JD’s witnesses are unreliable, that they are only remembering testimony against AH. She’s unpleasant for sure but she’s not quite as stupid as she seems.
Theyre trying to get witnesses to corroborate Ambers claims that Johnny beat her yelled at her abusively etc.
They also at the beginning were using facts to place the witness with Johnny Depp so as to claim he MUST HAVE witnessed these events.
Unfortunately the lawyer doesnt understand the film industry and how logistics works.
The projects and dates are to prove either Johnny’s career was either not effected by the claims or that he was ruining his own career. They seem to jump between the two narratives quite frequently.
@@RK-ej1to well that too kinda but more so to corroborate the events. Basically to beat defamation they just have to prove johnnys alleged abuse of Amber is true. But theyre also claiming theres no way someone could know the oped was talking about Johnny.....but one witness did question that saying "what other husband did she have?"
That wasnt challeneged or stricken from the record. The jury will remember that
@@Jaac822 trying to establish that johnny and him are close, he should have seen these things, or that hes clearly biased towards johnnys largesse andnso wont tell the truth
Imagine being an “esteemed” lawyer representing a high profile celebrity client. And resorting to using tabloid news papers as “evidence”
I love how he just laughs at her and says. I wouldn’t find this credible anyway
Immediately stricken down from the court transcript, BUT NOT FORM OUR MINDS. We all heard it, haha. And now it's on the internet. Also, it was stricken because it's an opinion and wasn't related to the question, but I'm pretty sure almost all of us agree with him!
time stamp ?
The part of this trial is how JD position was destroyed by Amber. That's why they use those tabloids. Not as a source of truth. Just to show that he didn't have a perfectly clear account before the whole AH situation.
@@sebastian5742 oh well, or using the brain could it be that such newspapers wanted to do articles used to sell more at that time especially? You know, what kind of gossip is saying "he's a great actor"??? We need the "blood" the hard gossips and juicy lies or exaggerations here and there to be interested. This happens to anybody else in the world every single day... Not so hard to understand. 😉
@@biancaenera2500 Chill... We all get it, but they still scored a few points doing that. You like it or not.
Is this guy on trial for being Johnny's favorite sound guy?
This questioning is ridiculous.
*best quote from this witness: "the only reason I remember that flight is because Amber yelled at me."
I'm catching up from this testimony 2 weeks ago. I'm curious what performance Amber is giving this Monday, May 16.
This witness proves what a great guy Johnny Depp is. Amber's attorney came off as combative. She might watch too many fictional tv law and court programs.
That’s what I’ve been saying all along- she is coming off as the EXACT opposite of genuine. Real. Truthful. Honest. Etc.
She needs to have some sense slapped into her (no pun intended). She needs to wake tf up and realize that the public isn’t half as dumb as she apparently believes them to be. And that life isn’t one big performance. It’s not a movie. She stinks of a false sense of superiority. As though she can just buy the best PR team and lawyers and it’ll all be good and she can continue on with her horrid people skills and awful self-serving habits.
That’s what’s so ridiculous! Like she’s watched too much Murder She Wrote - but I still don’t understand how that’s made her even more incompetent as an attorney... and somehow it clearly has😅 She amazes me, truly. It’s scary that Bredehof has any effect on people’s lives.
This attorney makes you really really really not like her. She’s unnecessarily aggressive and not doing her client any favors (not that anyone could do Amber any favors). Amber is going to have to pay this man!
She’s showboating half the time
I have been on the periphery of this case, but it has gotten under my skin and now I have it on, at least in the background, most of the day. Does Amber's $100 million counter suit have any merit?
I'm praying for Johnny.
This attorney is all over the board!!!
LACK OF FOUNDATION!!!!!
UNREAL how off point this whole trial has become! DERAILED
alot of attorneys are not easily liked. But the question is: is this attorney effective? Its ok to not be liked if you are effective as an attorney. Most attorneys have many "enemies". But overall i feel like this attorney is not effective. ALso heard's male attorney on cross with JD did nothing but reference text messages the whole time and that seemedVERY ineffective. overall so far, not very effective cross from heard's attorneys
amber heards attorney is horrible and this judge is biased towards her! he will win despite this
feel so too, the judge favors Amber's side
I noticed that too. It is really sad. Amber should be ashamed of herself!
This judge looks like one of those SJW and feminist...cringy and biased toward the rotten Amber....good thing there is a jury
The fact this guy is in a contract tell =s us all not that he is a freaking madman, it tells us that this guy is one of the best sound men there are, and that he wasn't even aware that Johnny had secured his position on set. It tells us that Johnny truly appreciated the man's talents and work ethic, and experience. why is she asking him if Disney lost money because of Depp? He is a Sound Guy!
Not the best necessarily, but Depp trusts him and doesn't want to take a chance with someone else for sure.
I work in the industry. Sometimes the most talented person is an a-hole that no one wants to work with.
@@AB-nb2ic I also work in the industry. I've never seen the contents of any other cast or crew members contract. Same goes with any occupation really. This lawyer could have asked questions that actually had relevance rather than wasting time.
@@AB-nb2ic You mean trusts him not to reveal the truth?😉
A-Listers usually come with a list of crew that they want to work with. So for example a makeup artist might be hired for a film but on the days where the A Lister is working their own makeup artist will take over. This ensures their brand is consistent in terms of the quality of the makeup or whatever else is important to them
Which truth are you referring? He basically said that amber yelled at him, which she clearly doesn't have any right to given the fact that 1. He is not her staff and 2. He is not under her payroll.
It only goes to show that Amber exhibit abusive behavior and can lash out to anyone she feels like. I will not be surprised that she's also capable of abusing Johnny Depp behind closed doors.
I don't know why I like his testimony so much. I think it's because he just seems so straightforward - mildly baffled by the statements the attorney keeps pressing upon him and just mildly stating and re-stating what he knows. At one point he can't help but laugh at the extreme statements Amber accuses JD of saying.
I was married to a drug addict for 7 years and never once did he lay a finger on me. Horrible line of questioning and ridiculous path for this attorney to take.
Thank you. It is incredible - the casual demonization of addiction is simply stunning.
Most women would never admit that they have a need to play the victim. So they will use anything they can to help them achieve sympathy.
Isn't AH an addict herself; as i understand? She might cover herself as well with her own violence...
You were lucky , Remember Depp is a drunk and is drunk 7 days a week , plus using drugs .
I too was married to an addict for close to 10 years ,we have children together. He unfortunately died of an overdose . He may have been loaded all the time but he never would have laid a hand on me or the children. He was a beautiful soul ♡
This lawyer is not good. She is grasping for straws and is leading the witness, along with phrasing so much as asked and answered that they would have to object to everything she asked. She also said the contract for Pirates of the Caribbean was dated 2022, not 2002. So for someone trying to be so specific, she is making mistakes in front of the jury.
She's bn making mistakes left n right
You are corrrect B! It’s hard to try and prove her accusations when they are not true!
Agreed
@Mami Makala She said «Amica Cream».
Even i heard that 2022 even the poor man getting harassed heard it than she returned to 2oo2
The lawyer is harassing the witness. She's virtually attacking him about things he doesn't know anything about. She's trying to get him to answer questions regarding information to which he has no knowledge.
He is up there lying away to protect his friend and sugar daddy, of course she is going to be hostile.
George this is emberassing. The lawyer is doing their job. Your bias towards Depp shouldnt influence your view thos much.
@@nealm6764 I genuinely do not understand how you can watch this trial so far and believe anything other than Johnny is a battered husband with a substance abuse problem, while Amber is a lying, manipulative, and violent partner that has already been arrested for domestic abuse of her previous spouse. Seriously, get real.
@@kennikia2234 The lawyers job is to do their best for their client, not cater to what RUclips commenters think.
So while you have the luxury of gushing for charming Johnny and all of his sycophants that he surrounds himself with who will say anything to protect him, the lawyer doesn't have that luxury.
This guy dated Johnny's sister who wrote/handled Johnny's contracts and he wants to pretend he doesn't know she was writing him into them? Come on.
@@kennikia2234 its obvious that @Neal M is a bot 😂😂😂
This lady got stuck in the '90s, nobody does this kind of aggressive questioning anymore, and I'll add, this is literally the 'you can´t handle the truth' kind of vibes giving
Her haircut is stuck in the Great Depression
She was 30 in the 90s
This is an absolute birds of a feather situation. Have you noticed some district differences in witnesses too.
Her hairstyle, makeup, and fashion are all stuck in the 90s!!
Not taking sides but the dark-haired lawyer lady on johnnys side was massively combative.
How many times did he CLEARLY answer “no” yet she keeps asking the same questions just in different ways. It’s lousy and crappy.
I get that this lawyer is trying to rattle him because he’s doing great on the stand. However, she’s crossing lines. She makes him answer the same questions over, and she’s braiding him. Figures why she’s on Ambers team. They’re birds of a feather. Not impressed, and what part of he’s in a Union doesn’t she get. She’s trying to confuse the jury.
Berating.
If she's going to be doing any braiding she can come over my house and help me out with this bird nest on my head.
🤣🤣
let her. She won't rattle anyone. She already looks like a total eejit about the makeup malarkey, and the "Amica" cream. Just wait till the Judge ends up having to hand down Judgment. Get snacks ready for the showdown.
@@gwendolynkaren5933 upbraiding that's a thing isn't it? I feel like she's badgering him a a whole lot implying getting nice lodging for work means that he's paid off. She's working the jury.
@@normafoster1959 It's a jury trial lol
@@normafoster1959 thank God its a jury trial if not this judge will definitely rule against Johnny Depp
I’ve watched a LOT of trials read case studies transcripts etc. I’ve never in my life seen attorneys this inadequate and unable to do their job
Yes it's a joke 🤣🤣 so many stupid often irrelevant
You into that for work or pleasure?
Kyle rittenhouse case
They have no evidence to go on! It's aLl hearsay!!!
What about the Rittenhouse prosecuter?
Absolutely disgusting how she is treating this poor man. Where is she getting this information from the question the witness. How can this be allowed to carry on? Farcical
But everyone IS LEARNING that Dep is frequently very drunk!
And they ARE learning that Dep's "FRIENDS" are really paid employees.... (rolling eye emoji)
All this is proving is how good Johnny treats his friends, he's a reserved guy but he's also a ''make my table longer, not shorter'' kind of guy. Imagine being worked into a actor friends contract to be THEIR expert in an area, guaranteeing you a decent living. Same with his artist buddy he gave a penthouse and gave money while he built himself up doing what he loved.
Johnny is a damn legend.
Not only did he work him in he didn’t tell him.
What is wrong with her lawyers? This lady was absolutely horrid. Why the hell would the judge allow this??? Why?
@@helenbaker1117 That's not true. Most judges will not allow lawyers to be hostile to witnesses. WITNESSES being the operative word. Witnesses are not on trial.
@@helenbaker1117 when did witnesses begin to be interrogated by lawyers in a court of law, they are not on trial
Why is the Judge allowing AH attorney to badger a witness?
@@ivannagutina correct.. i wish the judge to be replace by Kyle Rittenhouse's Judge..
@@studentoflife9008 on god
That is the Question.
Feminist?
because the Judge doesn't care about the badgering. Maybe she has something up her sleeve. Or maybe not.
This attorney sounds like she's fed up with this case. Doesn't she know she's throwing her career out the window? She must by her tone and how she is going in circles. She sounds like she's going to need psychological help after this case.
And a new career. Her legal career is finished.
I'm pretty sure she has PTSD from being scambers lawyer..
I like this witness. No ums or ahs. Just straightforward.
Sounds like this lady is constantly trying to bully the judge or other lawyers in a passive aggressive way to allow her to continue her waste of time line of questioning.
Yes. She was aggressive just to sway the jury-cortroom, is my guess. Made me ask the reason to the questioning in the first place. This is a show of good lawyers vs horrible lawyers.
That’s why the Judge is allowing it .. They’re both on a Power trip ..
@@shamhakim5851
Ok
I
They have no case after amber tanked it so she has to waste time to get paid those billable hours 🤣
not at all she is very professional and patience with her questions she is being nice to this LYING witness
Holy crap the Lawyer's questioning has it's own psycho mood swings. Why is she asking that Sound Technition any of these questions? Is she going to question everyone from on sets, the same bulldoggish way?!
I'm waiting for this guy to bust out laughing.
I think she is trying to paint a picture of Johnny. She is trying to make him seem like a guy who is intoxicated, one way or another, all of the time and because people dont actually see it, they cannot testify as to if he was or wasnt to depict Johnny as a belligerent drunk/drug user. Sad to see this but it is actually better for Johnny because her questions are getting the same answers from every person.
@@lindasmith1105 Bro I burst out laughing when she asked him if he had known of any violence between Johnny and another woman WHEN HE WASN'T THERE!!!! That was hilarious
Most irritating lawyers ever.she was literally on psycho mode
Agreed!!!! Heard’s lawyers only want to hear themselves talk, much like Heard!!!!
I love how all of her questions trying to frame this guy as unreliable, due to favoritism towards Johnny, completely backfire on her.
Dude was getting perks from Johnny he didn’t even know about, and relaxing in nice hotels because everyone on Johnny’s crew stayed in nice hotels… just proves how awesome Johnny is. 😂
The Nasty: It is very telling that you are not able to write the word 'man' and 'he' and you use immature alternatives.
Yet you are able to bring yourself to write the word "she".
Quite probably you have the same mental struggle to say the word "man".
This may demonstrate that you have a subconscious problem in recognising the witness is actually - A MAN.
Hmm... very interesting.
@@BobTaile lmfao you sound like you jar and sniff your own farts, kick rocks weirdo. 😂
Wtf is up with this “judge” she always allows ambers attorney questions to continue but when they object Johnny’s attorney she stops the questions and interrupt them
It's a woman... Just saying
Yeah I have a noticed that as well.
Exactly ! Wtf
I noticed that too, wtf is wrong with this judge!!!
Maybe she’s corrupt and got a secret check to try and make the case go in Amber’s favour
OMG FINALLY HEARSAY!!!! Wtf as soon as the attorney said “he said” that entire line of questioning became hearsay.. I can’t take it lol
I’ve been thinking the same thing; been trying to figure out why this witness is allowed to answer most of the defendant’s attorney questions about hearsay (except one maybe)but when the Witnesses for Mr. Depp are being questioned by his attorney the witnesses are shut down & aren’t allowed to answer because it’s “hearsay”(esp his security guard). Seems kinda off balanced to me.🤔
This lawyer is hilariously terrible. If courtroom procedurals have taught us anything, it's that asking questions you don't already know the answer to is the cardinal sin of a trial lawyer because you end up scoring own goals for the other side.
You'd think with all the money involved that Amber Heard could have retained a decent legal team, but this woman is embarrassing.😂
Shes clearly a professional seasoned librarian ...
Who cooks chicken with no seasoning
@@GTFCEO That's why she was yawning during cross. She was thinking about the chickens.
She sounds like somebody trying to pretend to be a lawyer.
Wait until we hopefully hear and see the jury’s reaction when she made herself and her team look ridiculous when she stated that Amber used a specific” make up “that wasn’t even made until 2017 and they got divorced at 2016🤣
I agree, maybe she's got plenty of grandkids and desperately owes them lots of past Christmas's presents. She needs the money to buy them presents 😁
attorney is helping the other side! Can't believe the judge is allowing us. We all hear all kinds of things that are rumors or whatever about third parties we don't know. She's trying to force it that if he didn't see it it doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's almost like she's trying to plant seeds in minds of the jurors that it did happen he just didn't see it. That is insane-- what else is he supposed to say? It blows my mind that this is an American Court. I would call this witness badgering.
The way this attorney literally mocks Depp’s lawyer almost every time he brings up an objection is so disgraceful. I don’t think I saw any of Depp’s team loudly borderline insulting Rottenburn when he kept repeating hearsay like the minions repeating banana over and over.
I don't know what's worse a sneaky snake ass B or a B trying with all her heart trying to be a sneaky snake ass b this lady ask and ask questions doesn't listen to the answers yet twist everything everybody says ask the same question over and over dumb ass questions at that
Like when she says you don't know for sure that he didn't hit her because you weren't there I would have said I also don't know that he didn't give her a big hug a sloppy kiss and a stack of cash i wasnt there
Depp's team is so calm and respectful with so much grace. Turd's team on the other hand suits her a lot.. aggressive, rude and very unlikable.
As father of a 6 year old and a 4 year old I greatly appreciate the Minions reference. 🤣
Agressive, rude and highly unlikable just like their client.. Her smugness is totally irritating!
Haha 😂 I prefer the minions than amber's attorney
The witness is a very good witness -- calm and sticks to the facts. He does not over-answer. Just short answers to what has been asked.
I don't remember
I have court next week . I tend to talk a lot , only the truth and I must do what he is doing or the judge will get angry with me . Now I get it ! He is the Bomb ! Anyone else have any links to help ? Please ? Custody case .
@@BlackStump172 Listen to the question and answer only the question.
@@trevorgwelch7412 'I can't recall' seems most of the people on his payroll have memory loss.
What did he witness?
Is “badgering the witness” even a real thing or is that just in the movIes? Cause holy crap she’s treating him as if he’s the one on trial! What a terrible lawyer.
Grasping at straws.
Well, she knows by those contracts that this guy is a Loyal Toady.
Just re ord it and throw it on neflix as documentary style movie with leading actors pop up to talk like in the office
@@k.hendrickson8735 Amber’s friends were toadies who had nothing to lose because they were ALL losers who depended on Amber funneling them financial support via Johnny. They lied to help Amber and now they are lying to protect themselves from the consequences of lying about Johnny and helping her evil plan.
She harassed him so much and interrupted him so much that he just started saying ‘I don’t know.’ Can’t blame him.
So let me get this straight Depp gets intoxicated and so getting beat up by Heard is fair game. This trial is becoming a joke.
Stupid system
This Lawyer sure makes me understand why ppl would answer, "I don't recall", "I don't know", "I don't remember". She seems more like she badgering the witness, needlessly.
same!!!!
Wow this attorney is treating this witness as hostile!! I can't believe the judge is allowing this. This attorney is badgering him!! Her questions are repetitive and she is trying desperately to find some fault in his answers. She did more harm than good for her client.
You mean doing her job? I think its rather pathetic to see how many people let their bias towards Depp influence how they watch the trial
@@ThePaintedHope You've got to be kidding me! It's plain as day she is badgering the witness and asking argumentive questions. Appearintly 27 people disagree with you as I write this. And it's not about me being biased which btw I am not, but about truth.
@@tammywebb7521 I too am biased, in the same direction I might add. The lawyers behaviour here is fairly ordinary seeing the circumstances.
People agreeing with you doesn't make anything less or more true.
@@ThePaintedHope lmao yeah maybe if it she was cross examining a liar who was giving an alibi for a suspected murderer. Lol, the over reaction was a bit too much.
How is she allowed to attack this guy so much, u would think he's on trial for homicide or something.
I feel so sorry for the witnesses and how this attorney just harasses them. I hope Johnny wins and this attorney loses their license. This is beyond harassment
CAUSE THEY ARE F'KD AND RUNNING OUT OF TIME AND ELAINES AFRAID PSYCHO WILL GO ON A RAMPAGE AND HIT THEM ALL IF SHE LOSES LOL
The state bar should look into the way they've handled this case. They are shifty as hell!
Ave Maajra I agree she’s is trying to make a mark for herself JD have being doing his work for years Women’s like that make man afraid of getting into real relationship because they’re afraid, where is she going there trying under mine the witness why did he marriage her at all did he say the trouble and her behaviour
Yup, i know, its just sad. Men do not deserve it
I am not an attorney and I know Elaine is a horrorable litigation lawyer!
This lady seems to be under the impression that being rude, nasty, and aggressive equals being a good lawyer. 😂
This lawyer is constantly testifying herself by making statements and then just asking the witness "did you know that?" Their answer is often "no". How is that even allowed?!
I agree... she asks questions that sound more like statements and she doesn't wait for an answer because she doesn't really want one... she just wants the jury to hear what she says so she can manipulate them into accepting her version as truth.
@@vbowen1593 good thing the witnesses seem more believable than the atrocious attorneys. 😂
You are so right! Usually when people ask questions they start with "do you, did you, were you etc". But she makes statements masquerading as questions
Because the lawyer is incompetent
America has changed recently. It's going to get wacky out her
You have to understand that she is looking to catch someone in a lie or fraud so they can use that. She is just defending Amber by asking any stupid questions because they have nothing on Johnny.
This lady attorney is awful. She's all over the place asking same questions to this poor guy.
Wtf is wrong with that lawyer and why is the judge allowing this to happen????
Obviously taking amber heard side
I mean if someone wants to act foolish and show out and by doing that prove that your case is trash….by all means 💁🏼♀️
It’s rigged, it’s always rigged
Many of her questions, are not questions, but accusations that literally end with the phrase “didn’t you!?” Not to mention that the answer to almost all of them is “No, … I didn’t.” Does this lady have any concept of what it means for a jury to find you unlikeable?
The judge should be telling Heard's lawyer to quit testifying but said judge may be letting her dig her own grave...
Amber's lawyers are so shoddy and very unprofessional!
This attorney is actually testifying. I don't understand why this was allowed.
She confuses aggressiveness with competence. Not a truly strong woman.
This witness seems to be so gentle, kind and well behaved. I don’t have that much experience, but I’ve followed and studied cases and never in my life would I imagine to hear such an idiot interrogatoire from a lawyer. This woman is ridiculous!
Mind Numbing in it's stupidity. Presses hard that he can't know what goes on with JD & AH behind closed doors and then when said he might have left plane before either of them she presses him to speculate that Johnny could have passed out and could have kicked Amber. And took her 25 minutes to finally hear him saying 'I don't know. Insanely duplicitous! And her insinuations are so out of line.
Why would he want to know what happens behind closed doors. He has his own life.
Yes but even if that’s true I’m like......So?!?!
“Did Mr. Bailey collaborate on any projects with Mr. Depo after pirate’s 5.”
Yes, he did on the Disney promotion.
“But was it a feature film?”
This lawyer is an absolute idiot. 😂
“I believe it was being videotaped..”
“BUT WAS IT A FEATURE FILM???!!!!!” 🤬🤬
“No..it was not.” 🤓
As we all know, the only real projects anyone can do are full length feature films that make money for the Disney corporation.
Common sense, really.
The first ten minutes is spent proving Johnny Depp makes sure the people the work on his films are well taken care of by incorporating it into his contracts.
Oh no. How terrible. 🙄
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Surely then the angle is to try to convince people that he probably knows Johnny Depp looks after him - to the point of including him in his own contract - so next it could be implied that he is obviously biased in favour of his employer and friend, presumably to follow on to casting aspersions about potential for dishonesty or being hostage to loyalty or other incentives.
Right? What a prick, paying all his staff and taking care of them! Oh no....how AWFUL! Bwahahaha. This case is insane. Johnny wins by public support alone.
@@loz_gs That'd be awesome if the results were based on people phoning a hotline to vote for the winner rather than an evidence-based trial by jury
Johnny won't let himself be a victim and it's refreshing. There's worse habits than drugs...like abusing "loved ones".🕵🏽♂️
My god. How is portraying Johnny Depp as a star who's totally loyal to his people to the point he makes sure they're taken care of in his own contracts without them even knowing about it advantageous to Amber Heard's case?
She's perhaps trying to make it look like depp has purchased the loyalty of his friends and colleagues...that way they would have a reason to be loyal to him and support his testimony
@@lucyvandervort6191 obv she's trying to. But she's also establishing his character to be a loyal person while wanting to portray him as abusive.
lol good way of putting it
Because if Johnny surrounds himself by enablers of his using through contractual negotiation, then he is in part responsible for creating a dysfunctional relationship in which Amber is often a mutual victim of dysfunction.
They have to ask these questions. I understand it. Whos deceiving who? Amber or johnny
After this fiasco, I don't see how ANYONE would want to hire this "lawyer" for themselves. Really, no one in their right minds, would want to retain this lady as their lawyer, after seeing/hearing this trial.
To be fair, she's doing what she's hired for. It's just a bad case
@@anoaq6978 perhaps you have missed parts of this trial?
Amber's lawyers are not doing their jobs lol.
- They didn't properly research, one of her lawyers had objected with a "heresay" on his OWN questioning 🤦🏻♀️.
- The other lawyer of Amber's, didn't seem to know his laws, and straight out argued that throwing objects (such as a big glass bottle) which ended up causing bodily harm, is not an assault 🤣.
- gets witnesses names wrong lol
- Amber's head lawyer accused the Judge, calling the Judge biased. And I'm not even gonna go into details regarding the makeup product that her lawyer claims Amber had to rely on, for over a year.
- As a criminal lawyer, a big part of their job, is to know how to limit the questionings. How to phrase the questions so that the witnesses answers would be short, to the point, not allowing witnesses of opposing team to be able to elaborate, or draw out their answers, that may lead to these lawyers having to object every reply that comes out of witnesses mouths.
So far, Amber's lawyers have not been doing their jobs as defense attorneys. They have not been able to paint their client in a better light.
@@yorkiesweetpea23 very well said.
@@yorkiesweetpea23 It's sad yet funny how they're trying so hard to smear Depp's name and say things like "WELL JOHNNY DOES DRUGS" as if that's an excuse or explicitly makes somebody evil. They can't simply clear her name, because they have absolutely nothing to go on since she's a textbook narcissistic manipulator.
Maybe she also wants Johnny to win
I can't imagine what it must be like being questioned by this lawyer.Her repetive questions when the witness has already given their answer is difficult to listen to, frequently the witness seems to turn to the judge in confusion .
I would have lost it 🤦🏾♀️ it’s so frustrating 🤯
Do people take edibles or something to get through 6 hours of basically a sentencing?
I have never been a witness but my ex-wife was once. She said its a terrible experience. The attorney mocked her, ridiculed her education, implied she was incompetent, and asked misleading questions. You can't answer the way you want. Afterwards she felt brutalized and slandered, and that she did a bad job on the stand...even though according to her client's attorney she was great. Her client won the case, but she said it was the worst experience she ever had.
I'm sorry, i would adamantly state,"what exactly is the point of your questions?" And "how on earth are you still working as a lawyer"?
No question.
@@ritasnow8319 I think this witness did it perfectly. Just answer the questions, no matter how dumb. Think about your answers, don't get tricked into making a mistake, stick to the truth and keep your sense of humor. Ultimately he was there for Johnny, and did a good job.
Trying to spar with the attorney is what they want. It makes you look bad.
How in the world is the judge allowing the lawyer to enter evidence? “Have you heard of Greg accusing JD of attacking him?” She may as well ask, “ have you ever heard of Sally, Cindy and Susie accusing him of attacking him?”