Hi Film goes out in the Autumn on BBC2 in the 'Horizon' strand. Will let everyone know when we have a transmission slot. And for our worldwide audience, Discovery have already bought it so it will be played extensively in the USA (no dates yet), and BBC worldwide will be distributing it globally (again no dates)....
Is cutting edge the best guess or just seemily so becasue it is new and exciting? Might we one day go back to an old dismissed theory because it proves to make more sense when we leaarn more?
Like chemistry, has to understand the individual elements, Time study must understand the components. There is a very rich record of the components of time, and they correlate amongst cultures. For example: The 36 decans of the solar year have components individually that make them unique. The 36 decans are found in multiple forms. The Zodiac of Dendera, Altar IV at Tikal, 21 - 56 of the I-Ching, the 36 Views of Mt Fuji, and the 36 chapters of numbers. They are also precisely in order in the first 36 chapters of Genesis. Also, the 20 days, which are the premier set of components for life on earth and quite possibly the entire universe, as the 20 standard amino acids correlate to them, as does the first 20 hexagrams of the I-Ching, and the entire structure of the Bible, as well as Tin through Ytterbium of the periodic table. The periodicity of elements is the space between changes. The demarcation of a new being from one to another. It is a river of changes, and can be used in any field of study. The study of time, is the most comprehensive study in history. There are tons of components that are ignored due to religious dogma and the actual physical assault on calendars over the last 500 years. the Bible is destined to be unmasked as the greatest hoax known, as it was taken and reinterpreted for nefarious reasons. It is quite simply, a set of stories depicting the components of time and their affect on all life and processes. May 31, 2017 begins a 13 day period of rapid movement. An unexplained motivation will cause life to propel itself into action of all kinds. It is like wind.
If it's important to understand 'time', then it may be important to also consider that we may have (possibly) wrongly assumed its existence at all. (re > the electrodynamics of moving bodies | abriefhistoryoftimelessness ) Logically, if, perhaps, matter *just* exists and changes and interacts *'now'* (i.e. with no future or past or time actually existing), wouldn't that be enough to also change the contents of our minds, to form impressions that are 'just here now', but which we (may incorrectly) think are reason to suspect 'the past', and thus 'time' exist? Given that we suspect 'past' and 'future' exist in someway, shouldn't there also be known and agreed scientific experiments reasonably, and practically proving the existence of either? (Specifically scientific experiments whose results aren't explainable if matter/energy *just* exists and changes). I'm sure I may be wrong, but even Relativity seems to just *assume time*, without pointing to any proof. mm
20 years ago there was no such thing as a Professor of anything in their early 40s. The main reason would have been that they simply would not have published enough to warrant it. Academia has dumbed down over the years too.
For truth about religion try Robert M. Price, ' The reason driven life ', Victor J. Stenger, Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers, John W. Loftus, Dan Barker, Valerie Tarico, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Truth-savescom, skepticsannotatedbible for Koran & Book of Mormon, talkorigins, wisdomcommons, mindvendorcom. 1500BCE papyrus of ani , David Mills, Joseph Wheless, Bart Ehrman,
If Brian is capable of speaking at this speed (which is good) why the F. d o e s h e s p e a k s o s l o w l y i n h i s s h o w s o n t h e t e l l y ? Honestly I end up shouting at the TV some days. Hurry the F. up Brian and tell us some science already!!!
Slightly different academic world in the 17th century. Are there any 20th Century examples you know of? All our profs were easily over 50. Cox was peddling the old myth of Newton/apple/gravity on one of his progs. What a sell-out the man is.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Just beatiful words!
I think he stays young because he smiles all the time... let's smile more people :)
Brian is do damn perfect...
Hi
Film goes out in the Autumn on BBC2 in the 'Horizon' strand. Will let everyone know when we have a transmission slot. And for our worldwide audience, Discovery have already bought it so it will be played extensively in the USA (no dates yet), and BBC worldwide will be distributing it globally (again no dates)....
Time is simply Nature's way of making sure that everything doesn't occur in an instant.
Does anybody have a link to what the best guess as to what the origin of time is? etc..
Is cutting edge the best guess or just seemily so becasue it is new and exciting? Might we one day go back to an old dismissed theory because it proves to make more sense when we leaarn more?
Like chemistry, has to understand the individual elements, Time study must understand the components. There is a very rich record of the components of time, and they correlate amongst cultures. For example: The 36 decans of the solar year have components individually that make them unique. The 36 decans are found in multiple forms. The Zodiac of Dendera, Altar IV at Tikal, 21 - 56 of the I-Ching, the 36 Views of Mt Fuji, and the 36 chapters of numbers. They are also precisely in order in the first 36 chapters of Genesis. Also, the 20 days, which are the premier set of components for life on earth and quite possibly the entire universe, as the 20 standard amino acids correlate to them, as does the first 20 hexagrams of the I-Ching, and the entire structure of the Bible, as well as Tin through Ytterbium of the periodic table. The periodicity of elements is the space between changes. The demarcation of a new being from one to another. It is a river of changes, and can be used in any field of study.
The study of time, is the most comprehensive study in history. There are tons of components that are ignored due to religious dogma and the actual physical assault on calendars over the last 500 years. the Bible is destined to be unmasked as the greatest hoax known, as it was taken and reinterpreted for nefarious reasons. It is quite simply, a set of stories depicting the components of time and their affect on all life and processes. May 31, 2017 begins a 13 day period of rapid movement. An unexplained motivation will cause life to propel itself into action of all kinds. It is like wind.
this guy is 40 something?! damn he could pass in his late twenties.
Thanks for all the recent video. I am really enjoying them. Do you know when the documentary goes out on the BBC?
Why Brian Cox keeps smiling.
If it's important to understand 'time', then it may be important to also consider that we may have (possibly) wrongly assumed its existence at all.
(re > the electrodynamics of moving bodies | abriefhistoryoftimelessness )
Logically, if, perhaps, matter *just* exists and changes and interacts *'now'* (i.e. with no future or past or time actually existing), wouldn't that be enough to also change the contents of our minds, to form impressions that are 'just here now', but which we (may incorrectly) think are reason to suspect 'the past', and thus 'time' exist?
Given that we suspect 'past' and 'future' exist in someway, shouldn't there also be known and agreed scientific experiments reasonably, and practically proving the existence of either? (Specifically scientific experiments whose results aren't explainable if matter/energy *just* exists and changes).
I'm sure I may be wrong, but even Relativity seems to just *assume time*, without pointing to any proof.
mm
+Matt Mars
Hey! Let me take a hit of that!
I don't care what it is you're smoking I want to try it.
Yes
Brian is Mr. Perfect.
so handsome @.@
i could tell you what the time is. its 4:57am.
It has to be his hair. That's why he looks so young.
Well that's just not true. The first example that springs to mind is Isaac Newton, he became a professor at ~26.
20 years ago there was no such thing as a Professor of anything in their early 40s. The main reason would have been that they simply would not have published enough to warrant it. Academia has dumbed down over the years too.
Bloody hell! He looks 12!
Einstein's special relativity is a good place to start !!
Wow he is 40? dam i thought no more then 27 or 29 maybe. Wow i thought i had a baby face.
and at least Cox admits he doesn't know. good start
I too was shocked at first. I think he'll die young. kkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Is Brian Cox the real Billy Pilgrim?
For truth about religion try Robert M. Price, ' The reason driven life ', Victor J. Stenger, Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers, John W. Loftus, Dan Barker, Valerie Tarico, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Truth-savescom, skepticsannotatedbible for Koran & Book of Mormon, talkorigins, wisdomcommons, mindvendorcom. 1500BCE papyrus of ani , David Mills, Joseph Wheless, Bart Ehrman,
Brian Cox: Have you ever wondered why you have to go into the future at the rate you do?
Producer: Every morning.
Lol.
If Brian is capable of speaking at this speed (which is good) why the F. d o e s h e s p e a k s o s l o w l y i n h i s s h o w s o n t h e t e l l y ?
Honestly I end up shouting at the TV some days. Hurry the F. up Brian and tell us some science already!!!
I don't think Brian has any trouble with ageing lol. He's 40, but looks about 25 - lucky git!!
Yup, i think he's stealing his film crew's life!
I'm glad he doesn't understand it either.
Slightly different academic world in the 17th century. Are there any 20th Century examples you know of? All our profs were easily over 50. Cox was peddling the old myth of Newton/apple/gravity on one of his progs. What a sell-out the man is.