As long as there are those who follows the fools. There will be money to be made! The gameplay videos will make it or break it for me. I will give it a few monthes and see. Unless it's something amazing from the start, but I hardly belive they manage that!
There will be a free to Play Battle royal in Battlefield 6. It‘s official. But I don‘t unterstand Why people don‘t want a Battle Royal in Battlefield. I mean there will still b stehe Classic Battlefield with conquest and all The other stuff…
@@erico1204 People probably dont want a f2p BR in BF because of what happened with cod. They focused on bringing content and balancing for warzone and the multiplayer suffered.
@@erico1204 Why should there be a BR though? There's already Warzone. CoD and Battlefield already play pretty similarly, depending on how it's done it could just be the same game but with a different coat of paint and a new name.
@@froston4 To be fair I get your stand point, however I think DICE introduced AI incase if anyone wanted to play the game at an later date due to the servers being empty, or there to train players to becoming a better player at the game.
As soon as they said this game was gonna have specialists that’s when I knew I wasn’t buying it and still haven’t to this day. Played 2 hours on gamepass and realized this game was a dumpster fire.
Remember, when watching the upcoming "Gameplay engine" Trailer, Just remember EA/DICE are Great at making trailers, and terrible at making Battlefield games this past 10 years. Don't be sold on the hype, and don't pre order until you see the actual meat of gameplay. I hope they will actually try this time creating a masterpiece again. "Make Battlefield Great Again"
Kind of ironic too seeing that BF4 is based in 2020 which is around when things got tense between them. Also BF4 manifested the collapse of the Arecibo Telescope. Which happened IRL on Dec 1st 2020. Spooky stuff..
Having China, Russia, the US or anyone else in a multiplayer shooter is fine. Generally speaking multiplayer doesn’t have to involve the politics of a conflict. We are fictional soldiers on a fictional battlefield taking or defending ground. There’s ambiguity. The issue arises when a campaign is added. Most writers for mainly multiplayer games with a campaign slapped on go the easy route and have some bad guy and his group of cannon fodder that do some great evil, with the story being that the world is saved and everything okay at the end of the story. It has conflict, a villain, the most mild character arc, and resolution. With the change in market where the big bad can’t be a faced actor like Russia or China cuz “my overseas sales” they opt the easy route of PMC. What I don’t think these companies understand, is that the general environment can be the villain. Most conflict aren’t WW2 where there’s a set good and bad guy. A respectable story can be told with these big faces without some country trying to nuke another or the purposeful targeting of civilians. Have the story be more about surviving a conflict, than killing Valdimir the slayer of infants.
in 2014 it was no problem beacuse a war between those countries looked like an extremely hypothetical situation now it looks like a very real possibility and NATO IS borderline in a proxy war with Russia. Also (not that the BF series is know to be an immersive milsim but) do you still want to play a game in the role of a russian soldier in 2024? I know I don't.
@megapro125 I would want to actually. There are some particularly nice clothing pices i quiet like. Still think it is better to not to include them with the war going on. Even Arma 3 dodged that bullet and that was with no war going on.
"Simple" things that EA/Dice can do to make the next Battlefield awesome (and win the trust of players back): 1. Use the cinematics of BFV and BF1 - these two games were dark, gritty, and beautiful; they showed the true brutality of war - plus they were visually stunning 2. Take movement mechanics and animations from BFV (e.g. vaulting, moving while laying on back, jumping out of vehicles, etc.), this really helps with the immersion. Side note: get rid of the stupid third-person downed view, it should be first-person. 3. Stop making the UI colors look like I tiktok video, less is more- it should be simple and clear. 4. Remove specialists and add the class system back - squad play is super important, people should play with a role and purpose 5. Stop making the characters look like cartoons, BF is suppose to be serious. If I wanted to play a game with characters that looked like pop culture, I'd play COD. 6. Make the game setting in modern day. Don't do this futuristic crap with a bunch of dumb gadgets. Make the gameplay based on the players and their skill, not some weird robot dogs or electronics jammer. 7. Create a game mode with a story like Grand Operations from BFV - every battle won/loss mattered for the next round. It felt like your were fighting for something, not just pointless shooting for some mercenaries. But what do I know, I'm just a fan of the old Battlefields..
Believe it or not almost everything in 2042 is technology we have TODAY. Even the robot dog. Are they practical? No. The basic solider isn't going to have grappling hooks or carry bouncing grenades. Most of the "future" tech in 2042 is stuff that is currently in R&D right now. Plus the entire Battlefield game series is a continuous story. Like how the last dlc of BF4 was with rail guns and hover tanks. The story is progressing closer and closer to the Battlefield 2142 setting. But as far as game play, yes. Specialist are so over done and corny. But the black pill is I don't think they're going away. Too many opportunities to push micro transaction skins. Battle passes. Live service nonsense. It's the future of games. Because people literally can not help themselves on buying the next big budget slop. Because we're all piggies. Eatting our slop. We may complain it's slop. But we're all good piggies that'll eat the slop nonetheless. We look only in the mirror as to why AAA games are the way they are.
@@jimboslamthey should do a game in the 1980s or 90s, no futuristic bs, but still somewhat modern equipment. Things live Javelin missiles and M1A2 Abrams and T72
Just make Bad Company 3 and call it a day. If they did that and wrapped that story up. I think they would be surprised at how well a well crafted story campaign and multiplayer can do in 2024.
All I want: - Modern setting - No specialists, just standard looking soldiers with the class system. Maybe let us pick the face of the soldier and what the kit looks like or something. - Loads of weapons like BF4 had. - I like the 128 player servers, 2042 just didn’t have enough people playing the game.
"Connected Universe" always just means "We want to take multi player assets and rip them off in the most lazy way possible for the 'single player experience' so we make more money"
My dream BF would combine the gritty war aesthetic of BF1 with a modern setting and BF4-style customization and weapon variety. A singleplayer War Stories mode with missions loosely based on real modern conflicts, and a prologue mission where you play as several frontline soldiers who don't last long as a nod to BF1's prologue. I'll just wait for them to make an AI game-development program where I can type that into a prompt, because I can't rely on EA and Dice to bring me a game like that...
I never played 2042 even though I spent years waiting for it since it was announced. The launch scared me away and then the revamp of the ladder seasons was kinda pointless getting into, knowing they’d Call it quits sooner or later. This is coming from a guy who grew up on bf3 & bf4 and still play them and bf1 frequently even after all the years. They’re golden, and it’s gonna be damn hard to top them.
The 'golden era' of Battlefield has passed. It's basically out the door at this point as much as CoD is. That 'What would CoD do?' mentality means Battlefield may be following suite at this rate.
@GalmLead COD is doing fine this year. Only Vanguard and MWII were trash, and even then they still sold incredibly well. Plus we are getting a Black Ops game this year with the longest development time in COD history and the best studio. BF is likely dead though thank god, 6 whole years of straight ass it needs to go 😂
@@null-hi6dtlmaooo ofcccc a cod fanboy battlefield has never been trash only up until now they even had way better multiplayer modes than cod yes true enough cod has wayyyyyy better campaigns but cod doesn’t even compare to battlefield in multiplayer
honestly what made battlefield amazing was the team they used to have. that team went out and crushed with The finals (or whatever it was called). im still waiting on ark raiders from them though. it was probably put aside to work on the finals being so popular.
hey man been awhile since i came across your channel but i really want to know why did you stop doing those weekly updates of gaming you used to do back then?
@@whybother7632 And what about the older BF games that featured Russia and China? They could absolutely make a USA vs Russia game, they just don't want to.
As always I try to maintain cautious optimism, a few changes I hope to see, is scrapping the hero/specialist thing they tried out ( battlefield isn’t Overwatch). Maybe actually giving a roadmap for their expectations of what they plan on adding to the title as time progresses.
If they had passion they would prioritize destructibility leveloution and player size. I want a planetside scale type game imagine an epic 2 hour match with 256 vs 256 multiple fronts. commander type players that control the movement in the game. There is so much good about old battlefield I wish the modern devs would study.
@@skullcrusher4999 I think a frontiers approach would be interesting, you have multiple different instances (matches) you can go into to based on a large scale frontline and wins and losses in one instance affects the field of play in the others such as new spawns or vehicles or large scale changes to the map such as a dam blowing up on one instance affects the adjacent frontline instance. Gaijin tried something like this in WarThunder with the World War mode but it takes a lot more thought and development than gaijin were willing to give it to work
@@MrMustang13i sort of disagree that it’s entirely tactical as after bad company they mainly focused on the arcade aspects as a shooter. I will say the rock paper scissors of classes and vehicles were much better in the old games than 2042, BF4 and 3 had much better maps where positioning and roles were important to winning, everything had a counter so every class was important even the tools had awesome usage, to the point if you had too many people picking specific ones and not adapting their play style to what was happening in game they would basically neuter their entire team. (looking at you recons for offensive rush)
What is specialist ? I just started my battlefield endeavour by ordering number 4 couple days ago waiting for it to arrive. Wondering wether it’s worth getting 2042 after 5 or not 😅
@@JohnnyCarterMusicOfficialspecialists are basically classes that has a name and a personality to their character unlike the old battlefield games where you’re playing as a generic soldier with no name and no personality
@@JohnnyCarterMusicOfficial probably because it’s something different from the old battlefield games and i guess it makes the game feel like call of duty
It feels a bit early and abrupt, but compared to the life cycle of bf3 and bf4, it's okay. What feels inadequate is that we haven't heard anything about the next game yet. Time will tell. I'm playing 1942, Vietnam and BF2 nowadays anyway lol
Wow. I must download it again for the fourth time and hope you're right about the popularity because when I tried playing it a couple of months ago I couldn't find a full server
Nato vs PMC leaves significant room for character 'identity' which at best means premium cosmetics for character customization, but could very well just be premium skins, or at worst, they kept specialists. Definitely concerning that 'heros' very well could still be on the table.
I wonder if it’ll be like Medal of Honor Warfighter where we have operators from NATO countries as our specialists.. idk what they’ll do for the PMC faction.
I don't think there will ever be a comeback of Battlefield, the modern state of the industry and the modern dice just don't lend themselves to the kind of formula that made Battlefield an unique and epic experience.
"we had an appetite for more 2042" how dare they. We wanted Battlefield BC2/3/4 with pretty graphics and new stuff. Instead they copied call of duty's homework, almost too a perfect T, and tried to sell us that aftermarket slop. Battlefield 2042 will go down in history as one of the most fumbled games of all time. This was hands down the worst battlefield game of the franchise and will probably keep that title for a long time. They removed classes and It took them two fucking years to practically double the content of the base game. Enough said I think. Dice CANNOT fumble the next game it has to blow this planet apart with awesomeness OR AT LEAST be as amazing as Battlefield 4/3/BC2 or this franchise is dead.
I've been saying they need to do mainline numbered series and Bad Company series and keep them separate. Mainline for normal BF, BC for their goofy experimental bs like 2042 was
BC2 is my absolute favorite BF, but this team needs to learn what makes BF BF. Imagine they do create BC3 and it's just like 2042, I couldn't think of a heartbreak worse than that.
One thing is specific when it comes to a new battlefield cross platform between PC Xbox, PlayStation steam deck. Whatever you might play. Along with allowing mouse and keyboard capabilities. If the game is going to be related as a modern military, or a modern game, it needs to have the modern like technology included. At the very least cross platform
Complete with: - 2 full maps (able to have up to 256 players) - 2 Assault rifles (1 with attachments) - 2 Snipers (one is actually a DMR, and the other has interchangable scopes) - 1 LMG (It's just a gun with a belt... who can tell the difference) - 2 Pistols (Glock 17 and Glock 18 for variety) - 1 Crossbow (all games needs a crossbow) - 40 Hero Characters (all quirky but soldier-like, with skills like: flying, laser-eyes, telekinesis etc.) - 80 Skins for each hero, unlockable in-game (by using real world money) - A Battle Royale mode (they've spent 70% of their development hours on, which will be abandoned after 1½ weeks) - And finally a Helldivers mode, called "Underworld Swimmers" (because we can't have a game without the newest trend)
Im so interested what the marketing will be like. For BF2042 it was all "ooh a return to form, ooh its for the fans" They really just gonna try that whole shtick again?
I would imagine NATO is standard army uniforms and the PMC will be a build your solider thing. I would be fine with that. I would be fine with being in NATO with military accurate clothing and going against a PMC group that is not. That’s fine because it still caters to what I look for in a BF game.
for the campaign of the new battlefield I would love to see something really impactful with a story that really captures the pain of war more like bf1 but maybe more cinematic? I mean just thinking out loud but I think that would be really awesome and I think battlefield can pul it of because its more serious then cod.
Right? But a real remaster, not just a shader pack, then full price. Old maps, new maps. Same setting, same weapons and vehicles. Throw in a couple of new modes and maps and I would be happy to even buy DLC packs like in BF2 times.
The main points that I can think are. Aim for a BF4 with updated graphics, don't give us specialist we don't want them, we "want" normal soldiers in a big war, just another gear to the machine. Don't add special perks of stuff like a reviving pistol, seeing through walls and so. Don't follow trends, we don't need, and I repeat WE DON'T NEED characters dancing or emotes, focus on what's important. Let us customize our soldier with camos and pieces of military gear like hats, war paint, berets and so, just as you can custom almost every aspect of your gun, we want to custom every aspect from our soldier. And OVER ALL ASK THE COMMUNITY WHAT WE LOVED FROM PREVIOWS BATTLEFIELDS. There are a ton of Vets with good ideas out there, if you try to reach to us as a community believe me, we will get in touch and give feedback to you.
What a pathetic end to a pathetic game. My heart goes out to the Battlefield RUclipsrs who've had to put up with this game for 3 years. EA Motive has done good work in the past and I hope they can help turn this franchise around. Honestly all they have to do is modernize BF4, minus the UCAV.
I have been burned too many times now. It'll take at least a year after release before I even think about getting the next Battlefield game. Zampella or not, I just don't trust DICE to deliver a finished product on release.
@@yeahman147 Of course. EA really hates money and want their stock prices to get halved with every release and therefor is telling them to release it unfinished or sets deadlines without asking any questions after it happening a few times - totally can't be that at least the old DICE structure was absolutely greedy itself and that they never told them the actual state of the product as releasing a buggy game and fixing it up later down the line worked in their favor ever since BF3.
I cannot trust EA or dice. The marketing for BF2042 wasn’t just dishonest. It was all a straight up lie. They deserve to be sued for false advertising.
The only thing I want in Battlefield is 1. Having realistic aspects for weapons, grenades, vehicles, and equipment. 2. Day Night Weather Seasonal Cycle System that changes every 2 hours in the multiplayer 3. Input Base Matchmaking as well Win Base Matchmaking 4. Immersive experience with everything being destructible 5. Give people a reason to actually play the game, win games, and create an amazing experience.
In order to even consider a private military to start to fight a single country you would need to solver so many supply chain, motivations and financial issues that it is straight up impossible under any circumstances without the private military being backed by another government. It is quite a dumb idea.
I remember how Dice and EA reacted to people hating all the DEI that was announced for BFV. Never give people like that your business. They don't want it.
They branded the game as the most "historically accurate" WWII games ever made as a character is powersliding with an MG42 blasting grenades and V1 rockets out of the sky . Followed up by a disabled female with prosthetic arm so advanced looking she might of ripped off of Samus's corpse from Metroid Prime. Yeah, people were pissed, because EA and Dice didn't understand the concept of being respectful to its audience and source material. Just about every company has made this same mistake over the past 6 or 7 years so hopefully they start to learn their lesson.
the Universe is allready online its when you go to play 2024 and you can go play the bf3 maps and with their weapons so on. so im assuming they are adding tthem there
Even after watching this video, i still cant get over the fact that battlefield 5's potential to be best ww2 shooter died off so early. The eastern front content + extensions could've brought so many disappointed players.
Battlefield and COD are fighting over maybe 100k customers, meanwhile we're all over on Helldivers II paying 30 bucks for a game with over 400k players at its peak and Joel hasn't even shown us his big plans.
Dude I was thinking today. I would not be surprised if EA sees the success of Helldivers and changes the next BF to have a similar mode to HD2 but a lame half baked version. Just like they did with Hazard Zone.
I want to see Battlefield take place on American soil. It's only been done a few times, once in BF2's Armored Fury expansion, and in BFHardline.. theres so much potential! Especially with every conspiracy nut thinking a civil war is coming (who knows.. maybe it is..). But with CODs new MW trilogy totally botching their story and not going the "Red Dawn" route, it seems like the perfect opportunity for Battlefield to swoop in and do it themselves. Imagine multiplayer maps in LA, New York, the Baltimore harbor, mt Rushmore, new orleans.. I pitched the idea to Marcus Lehto a few years ago, and he seemed to like it. It's so sad to see his team shut down, though.. so disappointing Here's hoping we hear more soon about this new game!
A Battlefield game taking place in America with the Second American Civil War and WW3 raging at the same time would be kind of cool. But will be wokeifide 😢
Funny enough I just bought it 2 months ago, I was old school fan from BF1942 days so waiting that long was weird. Good time to join though, it feels pretty solid
If they wanted to make money off of cosmetics, I don't see why they don't just have normal ass soldiers and shit, but give them a level of customization. Like grounded gear for each of the classes and factions.
Frostbite engine needs somewhat a clean sheet redesign for new BF, same engine with three teams. Motive = single player, DICE = multiplayer and engine, Criterion = online multiplayer, respectively
@@noone-em3wc They tried to suck up to China to sell in their market when they added them in 4. Surprising no one on the planet except for the empty heads at EA, China was mad. Now they're just too scared to make any country the "baddies". It's another aspect of the politics and inclinations of the industry these days.
BattleBit actually did a better job with this mechanic. If DICE still had talent they would implement it into the current/next title. I'm not holding my breath anytime soon.
People are A - Too stupid to learn from their mistakes B - Lacking in self control and are willing to pre order just so they won't miss on on a different colored T-shirt in game C - Shills for the company that doesn't care about them whatsoever They will still pre-order the game no matter what.
Classic would be more like BF2. Ever since BF3 it has mainly been the closer to CoD styled experience honestly, can hardly call it a classic if the game is pretty much the same apart of the looks and guns used otherwise.
@@Unknown_Genius Yeah, BF2 is definitely classic in the literal sense, but I really was just talking about how good BF3 and 4 were, and how they became classic games in the franchise. I own 2-4, as well as the Bad Company games, and like them all, but BF2 is extremely dated by now, lol. BF3, 4, and the Bad Company games still hold up nowadays, IMO.
I disagree about BF's single player characters. I liked BF3 and BF4's stories and characters. I was disappointed how they let Dima die in BF4, Hannah was cool, Irish and Pac too. I also liked how the campaign sets up the setting and story and the multiplayer was the aftermath. Like BF4's campaign was trying to prevent a war between China and the US, finding out that Russia would back China if a war did break out; then the multiplayer was the inevitable US invasion of China and as the DLC would release, it would tell you how the war panned out with Russia's "Final Stand" in the frozen regions in Russia. BF3 did the similar with even showing the continuing war in Iran after the Earthquake in the Aftermath DLC. That stuff is brilliant. It's a shame 2042 failed so hard because the setting really did sound cool as a post global warming apocalypse with low resources, failed states, and constant natural disasters (apparently tsunamis, landslides, and even fire tornadoes were also supposed to appear but EA pushed the game out before it was finished).
Battlefield series has always been more fun the COD lineup. Gone were the days of Black-ops when COD was entertaining. Battlefield 3 & 4 were amazing. If Battlefield attempts to mimic COD, I will be done with the FPS all together. Thanks for your content.
Игры
Remember: DO NOT pre order it. Don’t forget how 2042 was launched. Learn from this!
I’m gonna pre order it
As long as there are those who follows the fools. There will be money to be made! The gameplay videos will make it or break it for me. I will give it a few monthes and see. Unless it's something amazing from the start, but I hardly belive they manage that!
I'm gonna pre order it twice
@@lordprime.12 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
I got played for sure. I originally told myself that BF4 would be the last game i pre order. Then my dumb ass took the hype and preordered 2142 😮💨
Please, no fucking specialists, and no fucking battle royales.
Yes battle royale
There will be a free to Play Battle royal in Battlefield 6. It‘s official. But I don‘t unterstand Why people don‘t want a Battle Royal in Battlefield. I mean there will still b stehe Classic Battlefield with conquest and all The other stuff…
I agree, no battle royale
@@erico1204 People probably dont want a f2p BR in BF because of what happened with cod. They focused on bringing content and balancing for warzone and the multiplayer suffered.
@@erico1204 Why should there be a BR though? There's already Warzone. CoD and Battlefield already play pretty similarly, depending on how it's done it could just be the same game but with a different coat of paint and a new name.
BF3 was the height of BattleField.
preach
I’d say mid cycle BF4 was peak battlefield
@@eca3101 bf3 and bf4 were both peek and then it slowly tipped into a downward spiral
4 was
Bf3 pc was peak.
Bf4 pc was wack.
Most of the kills in this video are against AI.... shows how well this game went.
The AI soldiers is the main reason i don’t like the game. Just why? I don’t wanna play against bots
bro is probably playing Portal
And real War becomes AI vs mankind 😮
@@froston4 To be fair I get your stand point, however I think DICE introduced AI incase if anyone wanted to play the game at an later date due to the servers being empty, or there to train players to becoming a better player at the game.
Next BF needs to ditch heroes and go back to just classes.
Jesus is Lord
As soon as they said this game was gonna have specialists that’s when I knew I wasn’t buying it and still haven’t to this day. Played 2 hours on gamepass and realized this game was a dumpster fire.
Easter egg bro 2042 😂
YESSSS
Yes. That was pretty much the biggest reason I lost interest in the game and never bought it.
Battlefield V’s micro transactions were fine. There was no need to change it into garbage hero’s.
I miss BF3 and BF4
BF4 still plays online today.
Promoted!!!!
Exactly. Remaster those and i bet they get theirs money worth...
I loved bf3 single and multi-player.
@@StoneWolf2077plus the co-op
I remember getting home after class in 2010 and 2011 playing Bad Company 2, counting the days until BF3 dropped. Take me back to 2011!! 😭
Remember, when watching the upcoming "Gameplay engine" Trailer, Just remember EA/DICE are Great at making trailers, and terrible at making Battlefield games this past 10 years. Don't be sold on the hype, and don't pre order until you see the actual meat of gameplay. I hope they will actually try this time creating a masterpiece again. "Make Battlefield Great Again"
If they continue specialists.. it’s doomed
i can't believe you still care
Agreed 100%
Yep I agree completely specialists were so cringe
@@theloniuspunk383 Ratio
There will be, the people responsible for the battlefront remaster and other trash games are in charge
It's crazy to me to think that game politics are being mentioned when bf4 threw the US, Russia, and China at each other with a written story
Kind of ironic too seeing that BF4 is based in 2020 which is around when things got tense between them. Also BF4 manifested the collapse of the Arecibo Telescope. Which happened IRL on Dec 1st 2020. Spooky stuff..
@@alicatdotcom100% predictive programming. The simpsons did the same with 911 and trump
Having China, Russia, the US or anyone else in a multiplayer shooter is fine. Generally speaking multiplayer doesn’t have to involve the politics of a conflict. We are fictional soldiers on a fictional battlefield taking or defending ground. There’s ambiguity.
The issue arises when a campaign is added. Most writers for mainly multiplayer games with a campaign slapped on go the easy route and have some bad guy and his group of cannon fodder that do some great evil, with the story being that the world is saved and everything okay at the end of the story. It has conflict, a villain, the most mild character arc, and resolution. With the change in market where the big bad can’t be a faced actor like Russia or China cuz “my overseas sales” they opt the easy route of PMC.
What I don’t think these companies understand, is that the general environment can be the villain. Most conflict aren’t WW2 where there’s a set good and bad guy. A respectable story can be told with these big faces without some country trying to nuke another or the purposeful targeting of civilians. Have the story be more about surviving a conflict, than killing Valdimir the slayer of infants.
in 2014 it was no problem beacuse a war between those countries looked like an extremely hypothetical situation now it looks like a very real possibility and NATO IS borderline in a proxy war with Russia. Also (not that the BF series is know to be an immersive milsim but) do you still want to play a game in the role of a russian soldier in 2024? I know I don't.
@megapro125 I would want to actually. There are some particularly nice clothing pices i quiet like. Still think it is better to not to include them with the war going on. Even Arma 3 dodged that bullet and that was with no war going on.
"Simple" things that EA/Dice can do to make the next Battlefield awesome (and win the trust of players back):
1. Use the cinematics of BFV and BF1 - these two games were dark, gritty, and beautiful; they showed the true brutality of war - plus they were visually stunning
2. Take movement mechanics and animations from BFV (e.g. vaulting, moving while laying on back, jumping out of vehicles, etc.), this really helps with the immersion. Side note: get rid of the stupid third-person downed view, it should be first-person.
3. Stop making the UI colors look like I tiktok video, less is more- it should be simple and clear.
4. Remove specialists and add the class system back - squad play is super important, people should play with a role and purpose
5. Stop making the characters look like cartoons, BF is suppose to be serious. If I wanted to play a game with characters that looked like pop culture, I'd play COD.
6. Make the game setting in modern day. Don't do this futuristic crap with a bunch of dumb gadgets. Make the gameplay based on the players and their skill, not some weird robot dogs or electronics jammer.
7. Create a game mode with a story like Grand Operations from BFV - every battle won/loss mattered for the next round. It felt like your were fighting for something, not just pointless shooting for some mercenaries.
But what do I know, I'm just a fan of the old Battlefields..
Believe it or not almost everything in 2042 is technology we have TODAY. Even the robot dog.
Are they practical? No. The basic solider isn't going to have grappling hooks or carry bouncing grenades. Most of the "future" tech in 2042 is stuff that is currently in R&D right now. Plus the entire Battlefield game series is a continuous story. Like how the last dlc of BF4 was with rail guns and hover tanks. The story is progressing closer and closer to the Battlefield 2142 setting.
But as far as game play, yes. Specialist are so over done and corny.
But the black pill is I don't think they're going away. Too many opportunities to push micro transaction skins. Battle passes. Live service nonsense.
It's the future of games. Because people literally can not help themselves on buying the next big budget slop. Because we're all piggies. Eatting our slop. We may complain it's slop. But we're all good piggies that'll eat the slop nonetheless.
We look only in the mirror as to why AAA games are the way they are.
Bf1 sniping was amazing
Grand Operations sucked. We should have Operations like in BF1
@@jimboslamthey should do a game in the 1980s or 90s, no futuristic bs, but still somewhat modern equipment. Things live Javelin missiles and M1A2 Abrams and T72
Just make Bad Company 3 and call it a day. If they did that and wrapped that story up. I think they would be surprised at how well a well crafted story campaign and multiplayer can do in 2024.
All I want:
- Modern setting
- No specialists, just standard looking soldiers with the class system. Maybe let us pick the face of the soldier and what the kit looks like or something.
- Loads of weapons like BF4 had.
- I like the 128 player servers, 2042 just didn’t have enough people playing the game.
EA/Dice half builds a ship.
Launches said ship.
Sinks.
Refloats ship and barely builds enough hull to keep water out.
"Alright, onto the next ship!"
It’s like Boeing with their planes lol
Be careful what you say, you remember what happens to that whistleblower ?
@@GB-ev2cq I ain't afraid of no corpo assas.....
This comment made me burst out laughing!!! It's so accurate!
This last ship they fixed with a bilge pump. The pump just stopped working..
"Connected Universe" always just means "We want to take multi player assets and rip them off in the most lazy way possible for the 'single player experience' so we make more money"
EA Money glitch xD like FIFA
And create an extra single player experience not included in the multiplayer game
Did they learn nothing from MW3??
Or something like Portal.
@@aoofmg6684You’re telling me cutscenes that make no sense at the start of every season isn’t a good enough story experience for you? lol
My dream BF would combine the gritty war aesthetic of BF1 with a modern setting and BF4-style customization and weapon variety. A singleplayer War Stories mode with missions loosely based on real modern conflicts, and a prologue mission where you play as several frontline soldiers who don't last long as a nod to BF1's prologue.
I'll just wait for them to make an AI game-development program where I can type that into a prompt, because I can't rely on EA and Dice to bring me a game like that...
I never played 2042 even though I spent years waiting for it since it was announced. The launch scared me away and then the revamp of the ladder seasons was kinda pointless getting into, knowing they’d Call it quits sooner or later. This is coming from a guy who grew up on bf3 & bf4 and still play them and bf1 frequently even after all the years. They’re golden, and it’s gonna be damn hard to top them.
*also been watching levelcap since the OG days way back when 💪
I'm in the same boat. Those were the good ol days my brother.
at this point whoever pre-orders the next battlefield is a clown and deserve the incomplete mess of a product that they'll get
i will pre order it. and i accept the mess
@@whyalwaysme1106 rage bait needs to be believable
If no one pre orders or buys early ea will not put any money into it and just shut it down you dunce.
@@TheIsaacshepherdgood maybe they should invest in their selves and make a actual good game this time
@@TheIsaacshepherd If the only options are having a bad game or no game at all, I'd rather have no game.
No more fucking specialists, hopefully.
Yea would love to see them act like Battle pickups from previous series
I like the idea of having voiced personalities tho but with the freedom of picking any gadget
never took off LMAO I will never pre order again in my life, lesson learned!
If they don't return to the old Assault/Medic/Support/Engineer/Recon class system with it's gear restrictions I won't even consider picking it up
The 'golden era' of Battlefield has passed. It's basically out the door at this point as much as CoD is. That 'What would CoD do?' mentality means Battlefield may be following suite at this rate.
Not if the next game is actually good
@@Devinn504 Given the recent track record for Battlefield and CoD, what do you think are the chances of that?
@GalmLead COD is doing fine this year. Only Vanguard and MWII were trash, and even then they still sold incredibly well. Plus we are getting a Black Ops game this year with the longest development time in COD history and the best studio.
BF is likely dead though thank god, 6 whole years of straight ass it needs to go 😂
@@null-hi6dtlmaooo ofcccc a cod fanboy battlefield has never been trash only up until now they even had way better multiplayer modes than cod yes true enough cod has wayyyyyy better campaigns but cod doesn’t even compare to battlefield in multiplayer
They still can turn back. Even BF2042 is not that bad now.
NO pre orders. Only judge on launch.
i ordered 2042 bec portal hype. never again
Only a small minority will care bro
honestly what made battlefield amazing was the team they used to have. that team went out and crushed with The finals (or whatever it was called). im still waiting on ark raiders from them though. it was probably put aside to work on the finals being so popular.
hey man been awhile since i came across your channel but i really want to know why did you stop doing those weekly updates of gaming you used to do back then?
Finally, cant wait for the next unfinished bf game 16 studios have worked on
Remember: no pre-orders.
ugh if it's NATO vs private army, expect more skins or operators/heroes 🙄
Yep. Writing is on the wall.
they have to so they can sell in russia idk what you expect russia and china make up a large amount of battlefield players
@@whybother7632 And what about the older BF games that featured Russia and China? They could absolutely make a USA vs Russia game, they just don't want to.
@@Agentcoolguy1too much controversy right now
@@Agentcoolguy1 yeah true but they did announce the next game will be going back to classes well not announced but they hinted it so no need to worry
As always I try to maintain cautious optimism, a few changes I hope to see, is scrapping the hero/specialist thing they tried out ( battlefield isn’t Overwatch).
Maybe actually giving a roadmap for their expectations of what they plan on adding to the title as time progresses.
2:07 “EA definitely ‘RIDED’ the ship with 2042” LMAO. great video ofc.
Remember when companies used to have passion and actual developers in creative decision meetings?
I miss those days
If they had passion they would prioritize destructibility leveloution and player size. I want a planetside scale type game imagine an epic 2 hour match with 256 vs 256 multiple fronts. commander type players that control the movement in the game. There is so much good about old battlefield I wish the modern devs would study.
@@magiricod if the player size that much then it would be difficult to optimize the game to medium spec pcs
@@magiricod believe me this will never be a thing
@@skullcrusher4999 I think a frontiers approach would be interesting, you have multiple different instances (matches) you can go into to based on a large scale frontline and wins and losses in one instance affects the field of play in the others such as new spawns or vehicles or large scale changes to the map such as a dam blowing up on one instance affects the adjacent frontline instance. Gaijin tried something like this in WarThunder with the World War mode but it takes a lot more thought and development than gaijin were willing to give it to work
Go play hell divers 2 or something else made by a smaller team
No specialists. Actually have destruction. Emphasize tactical play.
So basically what Battlefield is supposed to be.
@@MrMustang13 exactly
How do those things help sell microtransactions?
Cry more! Destruction is overrated....
@@MrMustang13i sort of disagree that it’s entirely tactical as after bad company they mainly focused on the arcade aspects as a shooter. I will say the rock paper scissors of classes and vehicles were much better in the old games than 2042, BF4 and 3 had much better maps where positioning and roles were important to winning, everything had a counter so every class was important even the tools had awesome usage, to the point if you had too many people picking specific ones and not adapting their play style to what was happening in game they would basically neuter their entire team. (looking at you recons for offensive rush)
I was so excited for this game from the original promotional videos and after it released I have never been so mad.
Bro you don’t sound like the teacher from beavis and butthead anymore. 😢 been watching your videos on an off since bf3. Good work bud.
Thank God! Now please just no specialists, never again!
What is specialist ? I just started my battlefield endeavour by ordering number 4 couple days ago waiting for it to arrive. Wondering wether it’s worth getting 2042 after 5 or not 😅
2042 is ok for a fps but both BF4 and bfv are more of a classic bf experience and are likely to be closer to what the new bf will be.
@@JohnnyCarterMusicOfficialspecialists are basically classes that has a name and a personality to their character unlike the old battlefield games where you’re playing as a generic soldier with no name and no personality
@@Erick-ji6hw I don't get it dude like why's that a bad thing though ? cheers for the response
@@JohnnyCarterMusicOfficial probably because it’s something different from the old battlefield games and i guess it makes the game feel like call of duty
Go back to basics and community focus or perish
It’s EA, yk that’s not gonna happen
Basics as in what exactly?
Community focus lmfao. This is EA we’re talking about. They don’t give a damn
It feels a bit early and abrupt, but compared to the life cycle of bf3 and bf4, it's okay. What feels inadequate is that we haven't heard anything about the next game yet. Time will tell. I'm playing 1942, Vietnam and BF2 nowadays anyway lol
Wow. I must download it again for the fourth time and hope you're right about the popularity because when I tried playing it a couple of months ago I couldn't find a full server
Nato vs PMC leaves significant room for character 'identity' which at best means premium cosmetics for character customization, but could very well just be premium skins, or at worst, they kept specialists. Definitely concerning that 'heros' very well could still be on the table.
Any specialists in out. And if I see one shipping container I’m done.
there 100% will be "specialists", dont even put it into doubt
I wonder if it’ll be like Medal of Honor Warfighter where we have operators from NATO countries as our specialists.. idk what they’ll do for the PMC faction.
I don't think there will ever be a comeback of Battlefield, the modern state of the industry and the modern dice just don't lend themselves to the kind of formula that made Battlefield an unique and epic experience.
The only exceptions i have the BF franchise these days is that any new titles are bad by default, they can then work to change my mind
So there's a chance I will get to battle the Blue Helmets? Neat!
"we had an appetite for more 2042" how dare they. We wanted Battlefield BC2/3/4 with pretty graphics and new stuff. Instead they copied call of duty's homework, almost too a perfect T, and tried to sell us that aftermarket slop. Battlefield 2042 will go down in history as one of the most fumbled games of all time. This was hands down the worst battlefield game of the franchise and will probably keep that title for a long time.
They removed classes and It took them two fucking years to practically double the content of the base game. Enough said I think.
Dice CANNOT fumble the next game it has to blow this planet apart with awesomeness OR AT LEAST be as amazing as Battlefield 4/3/BC2 or this franchise is dead.
Bf4 is barely any better than 2042
@@beastabuelos6421 Being better than 2042 is not a high bar.
don't call this empty husk of a company, DICE. DICE is gone and will never come back.
Someone never played Hardline…
"how dare they" cringe
See you in 2025 when the next game is getting shat on while 2042 suddenly get praised. Rinse and repeat with the BF Cycle
Give me bad company 3
This would also be amazing. I loved the BC games!
oh god PLEASE
I've been saying they need to do mainline numbered series and Bad Company series and keep them separate. Mainline for normal BF, BC for their goofy experimental bs like 2042 was
BC2 is my absolute favorite BF, but this team needs to learn what makes BF BF. Imagine they do create BC3 and it's just like 2042, I couldn't think of a heartbreak worse than that.
3eeeeeeeeeeee
One thing is specific when it comes to a new battlefield cross platform between PC Xbox, PlayStation steam deck. Whatever you might play.
Along with allowing mouse and keyboard capabilities. If the game is going to be related as a modern military, or a modern game, it needs to have the modern like technology included.
At the very least cross platform
When does Medal of Honor begin? I could definitely use an Allied Assault and Frontline Remake from Respawn.
It’s happening all over again boys get ready for battlefield 2042.2 😂
Complete with:
- 2 full maps (able to have up to 256 players)
- 2 Assault rifles (1 with attachments)
- 2 Snipers (one is actually a DMR, and the other has interchangable scopes)
- 1 LMG (It's just a gun with a belt... who can tell the difference)
- 2 Pistols (Glock 17 and Glock 18 for variety)
- 1 Crossbow (all games needs a crossbow)
- 40 Hero Characters (all quirky but soldier-like, with skills like: flying, laser-eyes, telekinesis etc.)
- 80 Skins for each hero, unlockable in-game (by using real world money)
- A Battle Royale mode (they've spent 70% of their development hours on, which will be abandoned after 1½ weeks)
- And finally a Helldivers mode, called "Underworld Swimmers" (because we can't have a game without the newest trend)
@@LordCrisp my guy you need to work at EA right now
Don’t buy until after review. Every game since bf4 has not kept me interested.
@@LordCrisppov: modern gaming
@@Yanto260272even bf1!?????
Well, it was certainly one of the Battlefield games of all time
Worst
@@caleblawrence2743hardline is more enjoyable than 2042
lmao
@@caleblawrence2743 bfv
@@RestrictedHades V is great
Id like it to go to a cold war (1960s-1980s) type era because i think that would be interesting
They neeeeed to do a unannounced Bad Company game that continued where they left off
Im so interested what the marketing will be like.
For BF2042 it was all "ooh a return to form, ooh its for the fans"
They really just gonna try that whole shtick again?
Legit, this is the only thing im looking foward to, like, what can they even come up with??
Massive private military-sounds like design your own soldier to me
Yup specialists and goofy skins again. RIP BF
I said the same thing 😭😭
@@cpxmagI heard somewhere that it’s returning to class-based gameplay, no specialists.
I would imagine NATO is standard army uniforms and the PMC will be a build your solider thing. I would be fine with that. I would be fine with being in NATO with military accurate clothing and going against a PMC group that is not. That’s fine because it still caters to what I look for in a BF game.
for the campaign of the new battlefield I would love to see something really impactful with a story that really captures the pain of war more like bf1 but maybe more cinematic? I mean just thinking out loud but I think that would be really awesome and I think battlefield can pul it of because its more serious then cod.
I am dying to see a AAA title based around the Revolutionary War, or even Civil War
They won’t be able to get there money with camos unfortunately if they do those time periods
@@darkstar12344 If they did, it would be real corny to see anime waifu skins.
The player base "came back" after they started giving it away for free lol
Just remaster BF4 plz
BF3 would be better I promise!
That should be an added bonus. Dice owes us.
@@treedogg100% change nothing just upgrade it
Developer churn means the DICE to remaster bf4 isn't the same DICE who made it.
Right? But a real remaster, not just a shader pack, then full price.
Old maps, new maps. Same setting, same weapons and vehicles.
Throw in a couple of new modes and maps and I would be happy to even buy DLC packs like in BF2 times.
I hope they keep the weapon system. First battlefield where you can use good weapons as a medic
I’m actually interested to see what Vince has planned with a blank canvas.
The main points that I can think are. Aim for a BF4 with updated graphics, don't give us specialist we don't want them, we "want" normal soldiers in a big war, just another gear to the machine. Don't add special perks of stuff like a reviving pistol, seeing through walls and so. Don't follow trends, we don't need, and I repeat WE DON'T NEED characters dancing or emotes, focus on what's important. Let us customize our soldier with camos and pieces of military gear like hats, war paint, berets and so, just as you can custom almost every aspect of your gun, we want to custom every aspect from our soldier. And OVER ALL ASK THE COMMUNITY WHAT WE LOVED FROM PREVIOWS BATTLEFIELDS. There are a ton of Vets with good ideas out there, if you try to reach to us as a community believe me, we will get in touch and give feedback to you.
Gave on battlefield , embraced Squad and Arma
What a pathetic end to a pathetic game. My heart goes out to the Battlefield RUclipsrs who've had to put up with this game for 3 years. EA Motive has done good work in the past and I hope they can help turn this franchise around. Honestly all they have to do is modernize BF4, minus the UCAV.
They should keep the UCAV, but make it handle like a drunken jet
Or turn it into an overpowed battle pickup lol@@stryker0563
And remove thermals from tanks
BF4 gameplay with BF3 map environments would be a perfect battlefield game
I’m definitely waiting a month after release to buy it this time!
BF3, Bf4, and Bf1 should be the examples they use for this next battlefield. And maybe the fortification system from bf5 (and only that from it)
I have been burned too many times now. It'll take at least a year after release before I even think about getting the next Battlefield game. Zampella or not, I just don't trust DICE to deliver a finished product on release.
It's not dice. It's ea. Worst company in the gaming industrt
It's EA. Dice did sell out to them though so ya, they're both responsible in the end.
@@yeahman147 Of course.
EA really hates money and want their stock prices to get halved with every release and therefor is telling them to release it unfinished or sets deadlines without asking any questions after it happening a few times - totally can't be that at least the old DICE structure was absolutely greedy itself and that they never told them the actual state of the product as releasing a buggy game and fixing it up later down the line worked in their favor ever since BF3.
@@Unknown_Genius ea reputation is the worst in the gaming industry
@@yeahman147 Before the 00s already.
Doesn't change the fact that them actively halving their stock repeatedly doesn't sound realistic.
I cannot trust EA or dice. The marketing for BF2042 wasn’t just dishonest. It was all a straight up lie. They deserve to be sued for false advertising.
The only thing I want in Battlefield is
1. Having realistic aspects for weapons, grenades, vehicles, and equipment.
2. Day Night Weather Seasonal Cycle System that changes every 2 hours in the multiplayer
3. Input Base Matchmaking as well Win Base Matchmaking
4. Immersive experience with everything being destructible
5. Give people a reason to actually play the game, win games, and create an amazing experience.
Look back to the bf1 grim theme, I think regardless of the time it should be a very serious grin dark theme
In order to even consider a private military to start to fight a single country you would need to solver so many supply chain, motivations and financial issues that it is straight up impossible under any circumstances without the private military being backed by another government.
It is quite a dumb idea.
Why can’t they do some alt history settings, like WW3 in the 1980s or something like that.
We had bf 2142 - it was fun game with fun game modes ...they could just make 2143...
Definitely waiting to see how this one is before i buy, i won't pre-order again
I really hope for going back to heavier movement and gun play that keeps players grounded.
I remember how Dice and EA reacted to people hating all the DEI that was announced for BFV. Never give people like that your business. They don't want it.
They branded the game as the most "historically accurate" WWII games ever made as a character is powersliding with an MG42 blasting grenades and V1 rockets out of the sky . Followed up by a disabled female with prosthetic arm so advanced looking she might of ripped off of Samus's corpse from Metroid Prime. Yeah, people were pissed, because EA and Dice didn't understand the concept of being respectful to its audience and source material. Just about every company has made this same mistake over the past 6 or 7 years so hopefully they start to learn their lesson.
BF3 remastered along with a coop PVE would be nice. Especially if it links achievements and special guns to the PVE.
You can take the best parts of an older title while still making something new. Why does everyone want remasters?
nah, imo, battlefield v would be better, it got barely any attention at all....
Pity no Bad Company 3; BC2 came out in 2010, but most of us still remember Sarge, Haggard, Preston and Marlow....
the Universe is allready online its when you go to play 2024 and you can go play the bf3 maps and with their weapons so on. so im assuming they are adding tthem there
Even after watching this video, i still cant get over the fact that battlefield 5's potential to be best ww2 shooter died off so early. The eastern front content + extensions could've brought so many disappointed players.
Battlefield needs to be gritty like battlefield 3
Maybe I missed this part... is DICE still doing the next one with Motive's help? Or is this Motive studio heading the game in it's entirety?
I hope they make orc skins for the pmc and include shovels as their default mele weapon.
No preorders brothers
NATO vs PMC, already sounds lame
They're going woke. Say goodbye to realistic militaries in these games outside of Nato.
Yeah, are we afraid of offending Russia or the PRC or something?
7:36 surprised more people don’t use this type of strat. Love it
The fact they didn’t update portal is sad, I was so excited to play all the good bf3 maps remastered only for it to be abandoned
Battlefield and COD are fighting over maybe 100k customers, meanwhile we're all over on Helldivers II paying 30 bucks for a game with over 400k players at its peak and Joel hasn't even shown us his big plans.
Dude I was thinking today. I would not be surprised if EA sees the success of Helldivers and changes the next BF to have a similar mode to HD2 but a lame half baked version. Just like they did with Hazard Zone.
@jcaashby3 Likr they did with BFV?
I want to see Battlefield take place on American soil. It's only been done a few times, once in BF2's Armored Fury expansion, and in BFHardline.. theres so much potential! Especially with every conspiracy nut thinking a civil war is coming (who knows.. maybe it is..). But with CODs new MW trilogy totally botching their story and not going the "Red Dawn" route, it seems like the perfect opportunity for Battlefield to swoop in and do it themselves. Imagine multiplayer maps in LA, New York, the Baltimore harbor, mt Rushmore, new orleans..
I pitched the idea to Marcus Lehto a few years ago, and he seemed to like it. It's so sad to see his team shut down, though.. so disappointing
Here's hoping we hear more soon about this new game!
This guy! 👆🏾
Couldn't care less because I'm not america.
A Battlefield game taking place in America with the Second American Civil War and WW3 raging at the same time would be kind of cool. But will be wokeifide 😢
@@TheSlowJoe no
@@TheSlowJoe yup
7:40 I'm cautiously optimistic. Let's see if they make the right decisions.
Funny enough I just bought it 2 months ago, I was old school fan from BF1942 days so waiting that long was weird. Good time to join though, it feels pretty solid
Still never gonna give DICE any more money. Forever wishing they stop
It was ea not dice
@@jessefaucette7323lol. Lmao.
@jessefaucette7323 Stop making excuses for a studio putting out a trash game.
All their good devs went to The Finals
So why watch content on it or comment? Just fade away.
If they add specialists again I hope they have to learn the hard lesson a second Title in a row.
If they wanted to make money off of cosmetics, I don't see why they don't just have normal ass soldiers and shit, but give them a level of customization. Like grounded gear for each of the classes and factions.
@@OrionDawn15BFV did it perfectly.
@@themarvel779yes and no. The customization wasn’t appropriate for the setting and that was a big issue for that game.
@@OrionDawn15 How about they make money by releasing map packs and new guns like they used to do in BF3 and BF4
@@dingus6317 Actual content? Nah, too much effort. Give them a break, they're a small team!
/s, in case it needed to be said.
Frostbite engine needs somewhat a clean sheet redesign for new BF, same engine with three teams. Motive = single player, DICE = multiplayer and engine, Criterion = online multiplayer, respectively
NATO vs China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea would be cool
literally why do they always come up with some fake ass enemies that make no sense these days?
Don't worry US and Israel already working on that title
@@noone-em3wcMEC vs US vs EU from Battlefield 2 was interesting 😂
@@noone-em3wc Private military = Wagner group so basically BF7 is NATO vs Russia
@@noone-em3wc They tried to suck up to China to sell in their market when they added them in 4. Surprising no one on the planet except for the empty heads at EA, China was mad. Now they're just too scared to make any country the "baddies". It's another aspect of the politics and inclinations of the industry these days.
I'm not holding my breath...
0:24 It's a Dead Space remake; not a remaster. Anyway good video.
what happened to all the BC2 remake/remaster rumors
Private Military, I believe they trying to make a knockoff Makarov
Hoping to see fortification building from BF5 return to BF7
BattleBit actually did a better job with this mechanic. If DICE still had talent they would implement it into the current/next title. I'm not holding my breath anytime soon.
People are
A - Too stupid to learn from their mistakes
B - Lacking in self control and are willing to pre order just so they won't miss on on a different colored T-shirt in game
C - Shills for the company that doesn't care about them whatsoever
They will still pre-order the game no matter what.
It’s crazy to think we haven’t seen a great modern Battlefield game be released in over a decade.
I would LOVE to have classic Battlefield back. A game that plays just like BF3/BF4 did would be amazing.
Classic would be more like BF2.
Ever since BF3 it has mainly been the closer to CoD styled experience honestly, can hardly call it a classic if the game is pretty much the same apart of the looks and guns used otherwise.
@@Unknown_Genius Yeah, BF2 is definitely classic in the literal sense, but I really was just talking about how good BF3 and 4 were, and how they became classic games in the franchise. I own 2-4, as well as the Bad Company games, and like them all, but BF2 is extremely dated by now, lol. BF3, 4, and the Bad Company games still hold up nowadays, IMO.
@@kasper_429 True, thing is that Battlebit is the true BF2 successor imo, BF3 is more a good mix of CoD and BF than a classic BF feel to me
I disagree about BF's single player characters. I liked BF3 and BF4's stories and characters. I was disappointed how they let Dima die in BF4, Hannah was cool, Irish and Pac too. I also liked how the campaign sets up the setting and story and the multiplayer was the aftermath. Like BF4's campaign was trying to prevent a war between China and the US, finding out that Russia would back China if a war did break out; then the multiplayer was the inevitable US invasion of China and as the DLC would release, it would tell you how the war panned out with Russia's "Final Stand" in the frozen regions in Russia.
BF3 did the similar with even showing the continuing war in Iran after the Earthquake in the Aftermath DLC.
That stuff is brilliant. It's a shame 2042 failed so hard because the setting really did sound cool as a post global warming apocalypse with low resources, failed states, and constant natural disasters (apparently tsunamis, landslides, and even fire tornadoes were also supposed to appear but EA pushed the game out before it was finished).
Yeah bf3 and bf4 had a real backstory been told through dlc and they didnt even sweat for that.
You said that at every new season.
Battlefield series has always been more fun the COD lineup. Gone were the days of Black-ops when COD was entertaining. Battlefield 3 & 4 were amazing. If Battlefield attempts to mimic COD, I will be done with the FPS all together. Thanks for your content.
No BR and back to premium service, also we need a campaign so we can relate to the narrative