Battlefield 6 BIG NEW DETAILS...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Battlefield 6 BIG NEW DETAILS... EPIC Scale Realistic Destruction Confirmed by EA, Battlefield 6 Release Date, New Details Leaked! The next Battlefield is set to be a modern day shooter with massive open world maps and modern day weapons! Will Battlefield 6 Live up to the hype? Tune in to learn about Everything we know about Battlefield 6 from DICE!
Subscribe to @VGL
Follow me on twitter: / wesnemo
Main Channel @WesNemo
Contact: wesnemo@amg.gg - nemohhtv@gmail.com
#Battlefield6 #Battlefield #BF6 #BattlefieldNextGame #Battlefield2042 #Battlefield7 #BF7 #Battlefield #DICE #BattlefieldNews #NewBattlefield #Battlefield6News #Battlefield6Reveal #Battlefield6NewUpdate #BF6News #BF6Rumors #BF6Leaks #BF6Gameplay #BattlefieldGameplay #Gaming #FPS #GamingFPS #NewFPS - Игры
Will Battlefield 6 Live up to the hype!?
no
I assume he meant failure in terms of finance and player count and not a failure in terms of people not liking it and not meeting our expectations. The language a CEO speaks is from a different lens
I will be fine with the BR as long as they don't put all their effort into that single department. I want everything to be worked on equally.
Remember: NO PREORDERS
Remember I am not American
I already did
I hope they have realistic player customization. No stupid unrealistic skins like COD did.
Yeah same, that just ruins the game and makes it feel like a kid’s game
Hopefully it’s as good as battlefield 4
and BF3
i’m pretty sure they are going back to the BF3/4 style with the graphics and gameplay
I personally want a battlefield 3/4 feeling game with a high level of weapon customization and realistic uniforms.
If they can fix the gunplay feeling flat and weightless yes
Gunplay feels weightless in BF4? No way.
This is truely their last chance for the BF ip. U might as well bring back MoH. BF1 was the GOAT.
BATTLEFIELD DOESNT NEED BR! FOCUS ON MULTIPLAYER!!!
Single player campaigns are great for new players who want to get used to the controls and gameplay mechanics before jumping into the miltiplayer stuff. I often/usually avoid games where i have to jump straight into multiplayer.
They lost the pace with Battlefield gameplay....they decided to go more fast and ridiculous after BF4. It's mostly because of the influence of APEX and those fast pased shooters which doesn't fit with Battlefield, at some point you gotta slowdown.
BF1 was the only great fast paced FPS imo
@@khiemho162 It was beautifully crafted and perhaps the last BF made with love. Although that's when it started to spiral downwards into the hyperactive atrocity that was BF2042.
A battle royale mode? So they haven't learned anything.
Does that mean that immersion breaking gas that closes in on players to force them into a smaller area? I kinda hate that stuff, but as long as im still able to play normally, i guess i dont really care if others want to play like that...
if i want a BR i will play fckn warzone. I want full scale warfare, if battlefield cannot do it, then hell let loose will.
They should hire you
Im not a BR fan either, but if it attracts warzone players, then it will give more money to the BF devs/publishers, which enables them to hire more/better people, so everyone gets a better game in the future.
bring back actual servers like bf3/4
We dont need Battle Royale...its for COD...Battlefield dont need that Shit
Shhhh you don’t have to play the BR
hurricanes or tidle waves would be quite from my perspective
Keep the corny skins out and it will be alright
Narrator: They didn't
Why is there a BR mode? Focus on… the fucking core of the game. You want a shitty BR? Go play Fortnite…. Go play warzone. Stop focusing on bullshit.
Warzone is broken. As a long time battlefield fan, I’m happy to see they’re making BR an option
I really hope they make interesting upgrades, or unlocks when it comes to air vehicles, and ground vehicles, it seems like battlefield 2042 compared to battlefield v slimmed down a bit on the unlocks, there was only a couple for the jets in 2042, battlefield v had hell of a tone of unlocks.
battlefield 1142 is a good thing like imagine those knights fighting
Lmao stop
gonna be trash again
Hopefully they learned their lesson
Battle Royale? I hope they focus on the core of the series. Halo tried BR- it didn't work.
Why the fuck are they wasting time with battle royal? Bf5s sucked. Have a feeling it's going to be gay like 2042
I will be fine with it as long as everything from the campaign to the multiplayer has equal effort put in.
@@overdrive7349gay is not the way
@@overdrive7349 you’re “gay”
@FeedTheTribe why are you ghaey?
@@FeedTheTribe If you're just saying this just to get attention then that is just sad. If you want to get attention then you should do better than that.
I dont tornados was the problem maybe the execution but it was a cool backdrop
at like 10:10 atv gets a kickstart wtf small things
Lmao only shows clips of BF4
bf 3 / 4 were not peak just because of the setting they were just good games filled with content. They were made with fun in mind. I have ZERO hopes for battlefield 6. Its gonna be another battlefield 2042 filled with mtx, bugs, and utterly devoid of fun gameplay and content. The people that made the good battlefield games are all gone. DICE is a shell of its former self.
last time they did a BF BR, it was insanely ass, AND it was in a poorly received/marketed BF. BFV now is pretty alright, but it doesnt change what happened as ridiculous as it was. I dont see a BF6 BR doing well unless the formula from BFV is scrapped and changed entirely. theyre already not in a good way with how BF2042 was handled, but I can always hope theres more positive change made than negative.
I dream of a time where Battlefield can once again be THE competitor for COD that it can be, but a lot has to change for that to happen again.
BFV Firestorm was awesome, wym?? Way better than Warzone.
128 players should still be optional
Nah, especially if it sacrifices other parts of the game like destruction. 64 players is perfect. 128 player matches leads to too much unpredictability and ruin the game flow.
@@KirklandShunk optional . I don't need COD players every match I join
Bf 2042 is technically modern just 30 years in the futuer
It's 18 years, not 30 lol and modern means current time period.
@KirklandShunk no its actually 20 years and that's still in the future not distant future but still the future
BF2 maps ,commnader that what a want
Don't pre order.
Delta force is looking quite temping these days.
Oh Gods, it's Wes and his horrible voice again...
Yup already looks way too arcadey. Gonna be trash im calling it now
It’s gonna be 2042 but worse
If they were smart they would just make it realistic
I just want classes back and nameless soldiers of different countries fighting for map control. I miss BF3 & BF4 :( I hope the next Battlefield game will be the same, filled with testosterone & fun hahaha.
Testosterone is toxic now. It will be "for modern audiences"