I assume he meant failure in terms of finance and player count and not a failure in terms of people not liking it and not meeting our expectations. The language a CEO speaks is from a different lens
Single player campaigns are great for new players who want to get used to the controls and gameplay mechanics before jumping into the miltiplayer stuff. I often/usually avoid games where i have to jump straight into multiplayer.
You guys sound so stupid when you say this . If call of duty focused strictly on multiplayer it would have died . BR kept it alive ..... anybody with a brain would understand what their doing is better to get new players in not you goofy fucks who will by the game no matter what
Does that mean that immersion breaking gas that closes in on players to force them into a smaller area? I kinda hate that stuff, but as long as im still able to play normally, i guess i dont really care if others want to play like that...
Im not a BR fan either, but if it attracts warzone players, then it will give more money to the BF devs/publishers, which enables them to hire more/better people, so everyone gets a better game in the future.
They lost the pace with Battlefield gameplay....they decided to go more fast and ridiculous after BF4. It's mostly because of the influence of APEX and those fast pased shooters which doesn't fit with Battlefield, at some point you gotta slowdown.
@@khiemho1106 It was beautifully crafted and perhaps the last BF made with love. Although that's when it started to spiral downwards into the hyperactive atrocity that was BF2042.
BF1 was just different in a good way. It was during a time when there was futuristic setting fatigue and they just come out of left field like hey bi planes old tanks blimps etc.
@@allanallen1835 They’ve had the premise of the “other modes” for years now. I’m sure after 2042 they’re going to make sure those desires for the other modes to be polished will be satisfied. Battlefield has a great number of assets to make an awesome BR mode. Which, as a reminder, you don’t have to play.
Battlefield 2042 was supposed to be the game that united the Battlefield player base, that's currently spread out through the older games, but it failed.. Hopefully bf6 is able to do that cuz it would be blast to see multiple servers jam pack with players and action
All the time wasted on BR could have gone into making quality maps with destruction infantry and vehicles but i guess that what happens when all the OG dice devs are gone
I just want classes back and nameless soldiers of different countries fighting for map control. I miss BF3 & BF4 :( I hope the next Battlefield game will be the same, filled with testosterone & fun hahaha.
Get rid of Battle royal mode. Let COD have that. We love BF for the realism. Focus on Team death match / conquest people love all out war. Fighting against different armies. I don’t want to battle with guys in skeleton masks looking like super heroes. Come on EA don’t ruin it. I bought Battlefield 2024 played about 30 minutes of it and returned it.
@@FeedTheTribe If you're just saying this just to get attention then that is just sad. If you want to get attention then you should do better than that.
Bring back dog tags and actual worth while weapon assignments. Make the vehicles realistic in movement (staring at you little bird and barrel rolling helis).
They can’t bring back the operators like 2042. they CANT have double sprint and they CANT have the same gun movement. Idk how to explain it but the movement of player/ gun etc of 2042 was like…. Too fast. It was too Arcady like cod.
I really hope they make interesting upgrades, or unlocks when it comes to air vehicles, and ground vehicles, it seems like battlefield 2042 compared to battlefield v slimmed down a bit on the unlocks, there was only a couple for the jets in 2042, battlefield v had hell of a tone of unlocks.
Nah, especially if it sacrifices other parts of the game like destruction. 64 players is perfect. 128 player matches leads to too much unpredictability and ruin the game flow.
last time they did a BF BR, it was insanely ass, AND it was in a poorly received/marketed BF. BFV now is pretty alright, but it doesnt change what happened as ridiculous as it was. I dont see a BF6 BR doing well unless the formula from BFV is scrapped and changed entirely. theyre already not in a good way with how BF2042 was handled, but I can always hope theres more positive change made than negative. I dream of a time where Battlefield can once again be THE competitor for COD that it can be, but a lot has to change for that to happen again.
the "pinnacle" of battlefield for sure wasn't BF3 or 4. Jesus christ..that must be for people who didn't experience BF2 and the mods...way better features, bigger scale, mods etc etc
Coming into the battlefield franchise with 4 I’ve been only disappointed and let down that nothing has been the same since. I was hopeful and again let down by 2042.
It was a problem because it forced cross platform play, which invited all the PC players to come use their mods and the unfair keyboard and mouse. That's why no one wanted to play anymore! They were tired of playing with cheaters!
2042 really broke my trust in them. Charges us way to much and used us to test there game when it was not working and still not working what 2 years later. Would have to be heavily booze induced to make that purchase.
bf 3 / 4 were not peak just because of the setting they were just good games filled with content. They were made with fun in mind. I have ZERO hopes for battlefield 6. Its gonna be another battlefield 2042 filled with mtx, bugs, and utterly devoid of fun gameplay and content. The people that made the good battlefield games are all gone. DICE is a shell of its former self.
Hopefully now back to 64 players, console players won't be forced to play with cheating PC players! NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY WITH YOU CHEATERS! That's what actually killed the game!
They better not rainbow six this game, with unrealistic characters wearing capes and girls with bandanas and iPhones, blind wheel chair operators and so on.
Will Battlefield 6 Live up to the hype!?
no
I assume he meant failure in terms of finance and player count and not a failure in terms of people not liking it and not meeting our expectations. The language a CEO speaks is from a different lens
I will be fine with the BR as long as they don't put all their effort into that single department. I want everything to be worked on equally.
You mean bf3
Nah it's over, unfortunately. Maybe in 10 years something better will come out.
I hope they have realistic player customization. No stupid unrealistic skins like COD did.
Yeah same, that just ruins the game and makes it feel like a kid’s game
Init
And a DMZ mode
Yeah capes and transformer masks and girls with mobile phones.
They better not rainbow six this game.
Not to mention the moves you can have the 1, 2 and 3 players do at the end of the game.
Remember: NO PREORDERS
Remember I am not American
I already did
Lol definitely no pre order can't risk it , but I hope it's going to be a great game and I can get back to my favorite franchise
BATTLEFIELD DOESNT NEED BR! FOCUS ON MULTIPLAYER!!!
Single player campaigns are great for new players who want to get used to the controls and gameplay mechanics before jumping into the miltiplayer stuff. I often/usually avoid games where i have to jump straight into multiplayer.
should drop BR and focus on single and multi, who plays bfbr anyway.
You guys sound so stupid when you say this . If call of duty focused strictly on multiplayer it would have died . BR kept it alive ..... anybody with a brain would understand what their doing is better to get new players in not you goofy fucks who will by the game no matter what
Hackfield wil newer be able to compete anyways.
IKR? Casual gaming ruins all gaming
bring back actual servers like bf3/4
Hopefully it’s as good as battlefield 4
and BF3
i’m pretty sure they are going back to the BF3/4 style with the graphics and gameplay
If they can fix the gunplay feeling flat and weightless yes
Gunplay feels weightless in BF4? No way.
That would be amazing!
A battle royale mode? So they haven't learned anything.
Does that mean that immersion breaking gas that closes in on players to force them into a smaller area? I kinda hate that stuff, but as long as im still able to play normally, i guess i dont really care if others want to play like that...
None of their Battle Royale attempts have worked.
I don't know why they are trying to be COD... If I want to play COD then I'll just play COD.
if i want a BR i will play fckn warzone. I want full scale warfare, if battlefield cannot do it, then hell let loose will.
They should hire you
Im not a BR fan either, but if it attracts warzone players, then it will give more money to the BF devs/publishers, which enables them to hire more/better people, so everyone gets a better game in the future.
This is truely their last chance for the BF ip. U might as well bring back MoH. BF1 was the GOAT.
Nah bf4 was the goat bf1 was pretty good tho
Facts BF1 was soooo awesome, I love how they went for historical accuracy but kept it fun by adding experimental weapons that existed at the time
BF3 was the goat
for ppl who didnt play BF2 and it's mods, sure. You missed the party
They lost the pace with Battlefield gameplay....they decided to go more fast and ridiculous after BF4. It's mostly because of the influence of APEX and those fast pased shooters which doesn't fit with Battlefield, at some point you gotta slowdown.
BF1 was the only great fast paced FPS imo
@@khiemho1106 It was beautifully crafted and perhaps the last BF made with love. Although that's when it started to spiral downwards into the hyperactive atrocity that was BF2042.
BF1 was just different in a good way. It was during a time when there was futuristic setting fatigue and they just come out of left field like hey bi planes old tanks blimps etc.
Fuck the battle Royale bs, focus on the thing we want the most.
Yeah if I want to play warzone I'll just play warzone
The Core of battlefield is Battlefield 2. Community servers with admins.
Why is there a BR mode? Focus on… the fucking core of the game. You want a shitty BR? Go play Fortnite…. Go play warzone. Stop focusing on bullshit.
Warzone is broken. As a long time battlefield fan, I’m happy to see they’re making BR an option
@@Neubtoobit’s been an option and has always sucked. what was the first game that introduced BR? BFV and that game is garbage asf
Keep the corny skins out and it will be alright
Narrator: They didn't
We dont need Battle Royale...its for COD...Battlefield dont need that Shit
Shhhh you don’t have to play the BR
@@Neubtoobmore focus on other modes would be better though
@@allanallen1835 They’ve had the premise of the “other modes” for years now. I’m sure after 2042 they’re going to make sure those desires for the other modes to be polished will be satisfied. Battlefield has a great number of assets to make an awesome BR mode. Which, as a reminder, you don’t have to play.
No community ran servers, No battlefield
Just bring BF3 back and i am happy !
THE most impotant thing matters is Hardcore mode, that is the only reason makes battlefield a battlefield period.
Battlefield 2042 was supposed to be the game that united the Battlefield player base, that's currently spread out through the older games, but it failed.. Hopefully bf6 is able to do that cuz it would be blast to see multiple servers jam pack with players and action
Hopefully, it's as good as Battlefield 1 or even better
gonna be trash again
Hopefully they learned their lesson
I'm afraid so
I know I'm the black sheep here, but I never liked the modern-setting Battlefield games. Their old-war games were SO much better
Battle Royale? I hope they focus on the core of the series. Halo tried BR- it didn't work.
All the time wasted on BR could have gone into making quality maps with destruction infantry and vehicles but i guess that what happens when all the OG dice devs are gone
I just want classes back and nameless soldiers of different countries fighting for map control. I miss BF3 & BF4 :( I hope the next Battlefield game will be the same, filled with testosterone & fun hahaha.
Testosterone is toxic now. It will be "for modern audiences"
Just do bf3 remastered
Get rid of Battle royal mode. Let COD have that. We love BF for the realism. Focus on Team death match / conquest people love all out war. Fighting against different armies. I don’t want to battle with guys in skeleton masks looking like super heroes. Come on EA don’t ruin it. I bought Battlefield 2024 played about 30 minutes of it and returned it.
hurricanes or tidle waves would be quite from my perspective
and more destruction,like every single building
DO NOT PRE ORDER THIS GAME!
It’d be crazy to have a crew man some battleships in the next battlefield
I hope they will put the camos on the guns like in bf3 and bf4, as it has more varieties.
We need one like Battlefield 2 with graphics not that hard.
Why the fuck are they wasting time with battle royal? Bf5s sucked. Have a feeling it's going to be gay like 2042
I will be fine with it as long as everything from the campaign to the multiplayer has equal effort put in.
@@overdrive7349gay is not the way
@@overdrive7349 you’re “gay”
@FeedTheTribe why are you ghaey?
@@FeedTheTribe If you're just saying this just to get attention then that is just sad. If you want to get attention then you should do better than that.
I hope they go back to squads and squad roles like in bf3-4
I feel like battle field and battle front are the same games . . one just has lasers
I want hardcore with unrestricted XP and weapons progression like BF4.
Bring back dog tags and actual worth while weapon assignments. Make the vehicles realistic in movement (staring at you little bird and barrel rolling helis).
I can't express how excited I am for thid game.
They can’t bring back the operators like 2042. they CANT have double sprint and they CANT have the same gun movement. Idk how to explain it but the movement of player/ gun etc of 2042 was like…. Too fast. It was too Arcady like cod.
They never mention an Korean War battlefield
I really hope they make interesting upgrades, or unlocks when it comes to air vehicles, and ground vehicles, it seems like battlefield 2042 compared to battlefield v slimmed down a bit on the unlocks, there was only a couple for the jets in 2042, battlefield v had hell of a tone of unlocks.
128 players should still be optional
Nah, especially if it sacrifices other parts of the game like destruction. 64 players is perfect. 128 player matches leads to too much unpredictability and ruin the game flow.
@@KirklandShunk optional . I don't need COD players every match I join
I hope they have no battle Royale imo so that this would not divide their energy and they can focus on the nunber of maps, destruction, and gameplay
"literally convince"
I laughed more at this than i should have.
last time they did a BF BR, it was insanely ass, AND it was in a poorly received/marketed BF. BFV now is pretty alright, but it doesnt change what happened as ridiculous as it was. I dont see a BF6 BR doing well unless the formula from BFV is scrapped and changed entirely. theyre already not in a good way with how BF2042 was handled, but I can always hope theres more positive change made than negative.
I dream of a time where Battlefield can once again be THE competitor for COD that it can be, but a lot has to change for that to happen again.
BFV Firestorm was awesome, wym?? Way better than Warzone.
Its a modern war game
64 players? I’m wanting it to go back to 16v16. More players doesn’t mean more fun
the "pinnacle" of battlefield for sure wasn't BF3 or 4. Jesus christ..that must be for people who didn't experience BF2 and the mods...way better features, bigger scale, mods etc etc
I honestly do not care about campaign mode.
If the online gameplay is fair and balanced I'll be happy.
Bf 2042 is technically modern just 30 years in the futuer
It's 18 years, not 30 lol and modern means current time period.
@KirklandShunk no its actually 20 years and that's still in the future not distant future but still the future
battlefield 1142 is a good thing like imagine those knights fighting
Lmao stop
It's called chivalry 2 haha
Coming into the battlefield franchise with 4 I’ve been only disappointed and let down that nothing has been the same since. I was hopeful and again let down by 2042.
Gimme a DMZ mode!
Going to miss battlefield 4 movements though :(
The last battlefield I play an really enjoy an replay was battlefield hardline 🤦🏽♂️ when I first play it I was still in high school
People are still learning to fly helicopters lol
We don't need another Hackfield game!!!
128 players wasn't the problem. The entire game being shit was the problem. I don't see why that is hard to understand.
It was a problem because it forced cross platform play, which invited all the PC players to come use their mods and the unfair keyboard and mouse. That's why no one wanted to play anymore! They were tired of playing with cheaters!
I dont tornados was the problem maybe the execution but it was a cool backdrop
is there going to be a portal added like 2042?
2042 really broke my trust in them. Charges us way to much and used us to test there game when it was not working and still not working what 2 years later. Would have to be heavily booze induced to make that purchase.
Reminder: do not pre-order !!!
They need real people like animations graphics and we need pac and Irish
Just make battlefield 6 like BF3 and 64 players in console
Need to bring premium back and forget this battle pass shit
Thay need to remove thermal scopes... its dumb and make ppl quit
I hope they get the scaling right. Can’t stand the tiny character models in battlefield 2042.
Jets confirmed?
at like 10:10 atv gets a kickstart wtf small things
BF2 maps ,commnader that what a want
Lmao only shows clips of BF4
BF BATTLE ROYAL IS GONNA BE NUTS.
Don't believe the hype ,let see what the play testers have to say about BF6..
We don't need a Battle Royale mode..... it's so dull. I know games like Apex is centered on BR, but I wish they would privit from it
Don't want BR!
PEAK WAS BF2 AND BF3 NOT STUPID BF4
64 players so sad
Bf1 was the last good bf
Delta force is looking quite temping these days.
bf 3 / 4 were not peak just because of the setting they were just good games filled with content. They were made with fun in mind. I have ZERO hopes for battlefield 6. Its gonna be another battlefield 2042 filled with mtx, bugs, and utterly devoid of fun gameplay and content. The people that made the good battlefield games are all gone. DICE is a shell of its former self.
U switch ur RUclips name
havent been a good bf game since bf 2....and with ea mo,aint any hope for them
Is this PS4
Just drop the battleroyal mode, dont spend money or time into that shit.
Wtf is this dude talking about? What’s the narrative?
Hopefully now back to 64 players, console players won't be forced to play with cheating PC players! NOBODY WANTS TO PLAY WITH YOU CHEATERS! That's what actually killed the game!
Oh Gods, it's Wes and his horrible voice again...
Please don't make it CoD.
And don't focus on BattleRoyal this freaking suck just make it a little mod that people won't play and that's it
Jesus, no. Stop wasting time and resources on battle royale modes. They suck!
It’s gonna be 2042 but worse
If they were smart they would just make it realistic
Yup already looks way too arcadey. Gonna be trash im calling it now
Don't pre order.
we not
They better not rainbow six this game, with unrealistic characters wearing capes and girls with bandanas and iPhones, blind wheel chair operators and so on.