honestly good gamers are finally seeing how they get screwed over with modern AAA gaming now, it took too long to get here but at least it happened at all because i never thought the casual consumer would ever change
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
@@conqeeftador5559 Does it though? Does the inclusion of Skins in Battlefield really improve profitability? DICE / EA have back to back failed products. Their most successful BFs were (male, authentically uniformed) operators.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pc I agree , but today’s market is all about micro transactions, battle pass and skins . All the big games like Fortnite COD valorent . I just don’t see a possibility of the next battlefield not having those
@@conqeeftador5559 I would agree, but that model didn't work in Battlefield though. It didn't work twice. The infusion of those business decisions has cost DICE / EA hundreds of millions (if not billions) in dollars of potential revenue. I think the Battlefield market can survive, and proven, to thrive on not being those things. I mean, there is possibly a market of gamers that want a break from that, and Battlefield by returning to Battlefield 3 and 4 roots without the eregious microtransactions and skins can be that haven. Not only will it pull the OG Battlefield base back, but those from the COD space that are not playing it because its basically Fortnite with a COD engine.
The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
Played one match of BF2024, saw the cringe "heroes" and uninstalled. They were a blight in BFV and ruined BF1's respect of the source material, but at least they didn't take over the whole game. It's disgusting to have the stupid dancing and the cringe one liners. It's also the same reason why I never played Siege when I played all the other R6 games, why would I want to play a game where I'm locked into one abrasive character when before I had total customization?
@@Wolfpunkzjust don’t stare down the scope the whole time they can only see glint while you looking down the scope or use a lower power scope with no glint
I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get. The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
I miss the good ole days of DLC content the only problem with that though was people were complaining about the pricing of x amount on certain dlcs for maps and new guns ( pay to win in a sense ) but yet here we are in 2024 where people are now complaining about battle passes I think gamers have just come a place where we complain about everything on all levels
Every single big game that’s been coming out recently have been flops, and every single big game that’s going to game out are turning out to be flops too. I don’t have much hope, but maybe Battlefield will come around this time.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
Yup, it’s not a service, it’s a scam. Just and excuse to drip feed a fraction of the content of paid DLCs and charging goofy ass skins for the price we paid for full DLCs with 3-4 maps and several weapons. If it provided better value these greedy corporations wouldn’t have ALL switched to it
@@samuraisurge I do agree that free live service games suck, but I just never agreed with paid dlc. Especially for a game I'm paying upwards of 70 euros for
for what? you didn't learn your lesson with the past 2 bf installments to NOT be hyped? ok be disapointed. like i'm sorry but your doing it to yourself at this point. Wait until it comes out for like a month and see if its good. simple as. if you can't do that you deserve to have your money taken.
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand. The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83). I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
@@MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL They shouldn't have to start listening again, no competent company would stop listening to what their customers actually seek in a product. If a company built a car with no wheels and then the successor to said car came with wheels again, should they be praised like the second coming of Christ?
idm the lower weapon count. There are probably people who have been playing since bf4 came out that still haven't unlocked all the base-game weapons. Not many, but probably more than a few. I think the lower weapon count basically garuntees that once the first dlc comes out after a few months, most of the playerbase has all the vanilla-game weapons unlocked, and don't have to stop the base game grind to do the dlc grind
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks. I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage. I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
I liked the way 2042 did it. It's simple and easy to understand. It's also amazing that I'm able to switch scopes/ammo types on the fly. It brings a bit more realism to the game.
@@John-Xlol Ukraine just launched long range missiles into Russia and Russia fired a fckin ICBM in retaliation so we might actually get nuclear war before bf6 😂
For me what I would want from BF1 in the new one would be the seriousness. The screams when one is under heavy mortar fire, or when one is burning alive, or is screaming for a medic. When a heavy caliber (like rockets and such things) hit the ground and dirt flys up and you see in your vision a bit of that wet dirt. Or that panic breathing when a grenade drops nearby....all that stuff. I really want goosebumps while playing.
@@jonmacgyver743 yes, the gunplay was god awful especially for assault class. I fear that will be the targeted crowd at this point because ea is gonna chase the casuals money
I enjoyed bf4 very much, but bf3, something about it. To me it looked more real. Then again bf3 was my first online Battlefield experience. I didn't understand at first but especially later on I had friends to help me and dude, the memories of laughing our asses off, getting angry at metro, everything. I made one of my best friends from back then. He treated me like little brother, constantly giving me hell but he knew when to let me know like hey man, it's all in good fun, I love you. It was a great time I'm happy to have the memories
BF3 was peak BF to me. I got it in the late stages when all the dlc were just bundled in with the game. Camo choices actually made a difference and everything just flowed nicely most of the time. Sounded great as well, every vehicle has its own sound. To me, BF4 is just dark figures against a grey background when compared to 3 and 2. It flowed poorly and some vehicles shared soundtracks and the general sound was a little off. 4 had less vibes all together as well.
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
Bring back faceless soldiers, men only, no flashy goofy skins(weapons and bodies). Bring back more naval combat, 1942 had drivable submarines, destroyers, aircraft carriers and torpedo boats. Bring back the commander system from BF2.
@@tylerhinson8497we all know what kind of person would say “men only” Women play games too, and fight in war. The only way to take that is as sexism, sorry not sorry. You aren’t a woman, clearly, so let me explain to you that they’re a bigger money sink than men. Take one look at makeup prices and tell me I’m wrong
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
calling 1 and 5 terrible is hilarious tbh. Both have their flaws, and 5 could’ve been better in numerous major ways, but both of those games were a good time to play.
This felt longer than it was. Great breakdown and explanation of what we want. This is just my opinion, but BF3 had something that BF4 didn’t have. It was dirtier ,grimier, grittier, etc. BF3 was the greatest multiplayer game I’ve ever played.
Yes the gunplay was the main focus point. The weapon variety between all classes, not relying on gadgets, and decent map designs fit for most engagements. Sadly ea/dice has alienated players throughout the years and it started with dice La breaking gunplay for bf4 to cater to the minority.
@@johngood7619 You nailed it. The best rush vehicle in my opinion was the Amtrak. I LOVED driving that thing. If I had a competent gunner, easily top 1 and 2 on the scoreboard, and most importantly, a W on Rush. That thing was so damned good. So many people would just ram it into the M-COMM and let it get destroyed because they didn’t learn its strengths and weaknesses so they could keep it alive for an entire match. BF4 Amtrak was not as fun. I was so disappointed.
@@desubokudawanano BF3's Amtrak & UH-1Y Venom enjoyer, as an engineer, here 👨🔧I swear If I would've received a 1$ for everytime I saved my entire team, mostly solo, by obliterating main target on "rush mode" by sticking close to it via damn amtrak in a potentially last moments in those raids, I would be a millionaire... and that was hella fun, like everything in this game.
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
No, just you always online losers want that. The majority of people want the game to evolve and grow, not stagnate on gameplay from 10+ years ago. Also the battlefield “community” should be the last people listened to, nothing but the biggest crybabies exist with there. Go outside touch grass and stop crying about video games
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
DICE gravitating toward Call of Duty and Apex gameplay/mechanics/skins at the cost of things like levelation and suppresion is what is destroying this game dude.
US is a part of NATO, bro. SMH. You guy's will buy this shit and as long as you do, they'll keep making shit games. Don't fall for it. Wait til it comes out and check the reviews.
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
BF2 was great. I dont think BF3 or 4 came close to what BF2 was. As long as I don't get anything woke I am happy. But, I am sure they will find something to put in the single player.
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
I unfourtunately was one of the pre-order victims for 2042. This game has to be amazing with amazing graphics, amazing animations, amazing maps, and amazing technology before I even think of opening my wallet
2 месяца назад+18
If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
couldnt agree more. this was really annoying in 2042. they dont have the balls anymore to reference the real world because they are afraid to offend some people.
The only thing I want to see come over from 2042 is the AI bots to help fill up all servers, or (with strict and clear parameters) to play solo/coop. Not just for the largest maps, but all maps. There shouldn’t be any reason to wait for 15 more players just to start a match, no running from one side of the map to the other without seeing an enemy, no reason you can’t find a game because there are no other players in your location or time zone, and it’s a great way to check out weapons and vehicle skins etc without losing stats. There should be enough data by release to make sure the bots are smarter too. I honestly don’t see a downside to adding bots to any BF game as long as they aren’t literally encouraging players to farm them.
Remember kids: the last great battlefield (battlefield 4) had options. There was class options. With around 100 basegame primary weapons for EACH class. There was vehicle options. Each vehicle in the game could be customized right down to the machine gun. A scout helio could be suited to battle tanks. Maps had options. There was no dominant objective. Some objectives were specifically captured with vehicles. While in other capture points, infantry wreck vehicles. Versatility. A tank felt super overpowered. And so did RPGs. Nothing ruled the map. There was a foodchain. When certain things got higher on the food chain, people redeploy with an idea to fight it. Again, options. Options. When BF1 had 20 base game weapons in TOTAL, and afew different vehicles versions. I knew it was going to be a "meta" type of shooter.
I'll be honest, I'm not exited about a battlefield 4.5, id be more excited about bf3.5 or bfbc2.5, most emphasis on bf3. Bf4 was good and it has aged well but I really thought bf4 was taking multiple steps back from bf3. it was a true masterpiece.
Haven’t bought a BF game since BF1. I hope this one gets it done for me. Didn’t even touch 5, played 2042 on a friend’s system and was disappointed. Bad Company 2 and BF3 made me fall in love with the franchise. 4 and 1 kept me hooked and I didn’t even consider 5 or 2042. I just want a good campaign again😞
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
US was EU, EU vs RU, RU vs CN, CN vs US maps. The only way I see Europe actually paying for a military is if they break away from the USD and SWFT hegemony, and it just makes a novel concept, like Tom Clancy's EndWar
@@NYG5 EndWar is almost exactly what I was expecting from this, setting wise. The deal might be a group of mercenaries funded by Russia and China, but they take on an anti-superpower cause instead of just an anti-western one. Might draw in more nations and bodies that way for them to actually have the ability to take on NATO in open warfare. BF2 also had EU in a dlc with a couple maps fighting China and MEC.
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
Im delusional but I really hope DICE makes a bf3 like campaign for the next battlefield. A campain where you're not a super soldier, you're just a soldier telling what you saw and did. A game where the protagonsit is fragile like every human.
Game development used to be about making a decent game that was fun and bug free. Now its about making a game that they can break into bits to sell piece mail and an experience that's just good enough to play and just bad enough to incentivise microtransactions.
@idiopathictendencies8453 Exactly this is nothing new lol The same complaints now existed a decade plus ago it took 2 years for the universally loved BF4 to actually get "fixed", shit i the remember constant whining on the forums about DLC prices for both. Big stretch saying game development "used to be" when the multi-player games we love never were to begin with
They need to show gameplay on the first day of the reveal. Cinematic trailers are cool and all but the trust in the community is very low and they need to reassure us that they can make a good game that, at least, looks like it plays well. As well as the tone and graphics of the game are appropriate with the setting of the war and conflicts going on. No more quirky dialogues like 2042 at launch please for the love of god.
The most excited ive ever been was during the BF4 beta that was 2 weeks of pure bliss ,the level design from outside in bright areas moving up into a tunnel system through old train cars where night vision and flashlights served a genuine purpose the sound design was phenomenal. Man those were the days to get something like that again with destructable environments would bring me back no question
People keep talking about how the 2042 trailer was great and how the game launch was a dissapointment. I'll tell you what's a good game trailer, the BF3 multiplayer reveal trailer. Why? It actually shows the game. Not some pre rendered ultra hype machine cinematic with tornadoes and explosions. Keep it simple ffs
They're taking a gamble trying to make another Battlefield game in general after that shit show. I'm done caring about what EA does at this point. I still play Battlefield 4 on PC and it's a great game. It's exactly what I want. I don't have to wait around for EA to try and recreate it. I assume that everything EA says is a lie until it's proven otherwise. Even if they are making a Battlefield 4.5, I bet they're going to find a way to completely fuck it up and ruin everything.
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction. I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go. But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
4:37 ''I can't identify those tanks from that angle'' Bruh The grills on the back of the hull clearly indicate that it is future variation of M1 Abrams, thus it is American tank. Pretty easily identifiable if someone has played BF3/4 before.
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
The difference about this coming from Vince is that he has never missed on any game he has released. Zero. This is what gives me hope for the outcome of this game. Vince was Activision's golden child until they got greedy after MW2 and started to control his creativity over Call of Duty, and EA gives him free reign to do whatever he wants creativity wise, thats why he works at EA. I think he's about to turn Battlefield into his new legacy game, since COD was his baby. Here's a list of the games he's produced: Medal of honor: Allied Assault Call of Duty 1 Call of Duty 2 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 Titanfall Titanfall 2 Apex Legends Jedi - Fallen Order Jedi - Survivor EA DICE Sweden's new studio director Rebecka Coutaz, also has some great titles she's lead back in Ubisoft, all titles launched without major problems. I think this new version of DICE is gonna mop up the FPS sphere. All of that old blood was uninspired and tired of making Battlefield, got complacent and egotistical. Still, DO NOT PREORDER.
They say BACK TO ITS CORE!!! WHY KEEP MENTIONING WARZONE AND A BATTLE ROYALE MODE FFS - And on another note, Frostbite engine can't be THAT hard to use, the hackers know it inside and out that's why in an interview with RUclipsr GhostGaming they stated that they will have their cheats and hacks ready when the next BF game comes out - search for Ghosts video. FREE to play Battleroyale WILL kill battlefield once and for all and bring in all the sad cheaters and hackers, the dregs of the gaming community - A MAIN AIM WOULD BE TO KEEP THE HACKERS OUT leave stuff that to COD FFS along with the stupid skins and trinkets to hang on your weapon - it aint Battlefield!! Go on Dice f*ck this up... Ghost Recon's new game might be the next game on my playing list then.
Can I get a Battlefield/shooter where I don't see people with candy colored guns and weird costumes? Can it have semi-realistic mobility where the characters aren't flying around/sliding/drop-shotting/or whatever with stupidly high degrees of accuracy? Can I get a smaller player count so that it feels like my squad's contribution actually means something rather than getting steam-rolled by 20 guys at once when they finally decide to recap Bravo? Can we make suppression and MGs great again so that the sniper I'm lighting up doesn't just turn around and 1-tap me?
The thing is is that i actually liked the military sci-fi of 2042, id say the game is in a pretty good state rn. If they just made battlefield 2047 or sum shit and added a campaign and some cool tech with some new factions, and made the gameplay comparible to the old games like BF4 that would be great. (also no speciallists, I want to feel like a standard soldier in a war, also I want combat robots as skins for each class.)
Add option to let player custom: weather, day time, night time, dusk, fully destructable buildings, old + new guns + fully customization, bring back objectives that give bonus like tank spawn, AC-130 if captured, bring back the movement mechanic.
DO NOT PREORDER!
Never again... Last time I got burned was 2017 battlefront 2
like farming
Made that mistake with 2042, never again
@@ImBored8141 Dude them not letting me refund still pisses me off to this day. lol
@@ImBored8141Fr💀 My first ever pre-order too🤣 I should've known from the BETA
"DO NOT PREORDER" seems to be the new slogan for the new Battlefield lol
You mean every game
honestly good gamers are finally seeing how they get screwed over with modern AAA gaming now, it took too long to get here but at least it happened at all because i never thought the casual consumer would ever change
Its been that way for almost a decade
You should never preorder a game.
Even when you love the publisher/developer
>More like every game
>For the last 10 years
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
Sadly that’s impossible. New kids these days foam at the mouth for skins like Fortnite . And that’s what brings the most money
@@conqeeftador5559 Does it though? Does the inclusion of Skins in Battlefield really improve profitability? DICE / EA have back to back failed products. Their most successful BFs were (male, authentically uniformed) operators.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pc I agree , but today’s market is all about micro transactions, battle pass and skins . All the big games like Fortnite COD valorent . I just don’t see a possibility of the next battlefield not having those
@@conqeeftador5559 I would agree, but that model didn't work in Battlefield though. It didn't work twice. The infusion of those business decisions has cost DICE / EA hundreds of millions (if not billions) in dollars of potential revenue. I think the Battlefield market can survive, and proven, to thrive on not being those things. I mean, there is possibly a market of gamers that want a break from that, and Battlefield by returning to Battlefield 3 and 4 roots without the eregious microtransactions and skins can be that haven. Not only will it pull the OG Battlefield base back, but those from the COD space that are not playing it because its basically Fortnite with a COD engine.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pcgood points , hopefully you are right
The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
Ah the cancerous battlepass
Played one match of BF2024, saw the cringe "heroes" and uninstalled. They were a blight in BFV and ruined BF1's respect of the source material, but at least they didn't take over the whole game. It's disgusting to have the stupid dancing and the cringe one liners.
It's also the same reason why I never played Siege when I played all the other R6 games, why would I want to play a game where I'm locked into one abrasive character when before I had total customization?
1000000% agree
@@Wolfpunkzjust don’t stare down the scope the whole time they can only see glint while you looking down the scope or use a lower power scope with no glint
I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get.
The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@RyneLanders ok
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
@@RyneLandersif your broke you won't be able to buy premium either so in away your kind of screwed both ways
Remember, no preorders.
I already did 😉
DO NOT PREORDER
@Machoman50ta What video did you post that comment on?
@Machoman50tacan’t see it in your description
@Machoman50tayour description is just racial slur 💀
I preordered for myself, neighbors, and cousins.
10 of millions of people will do it anyways
I'm still mad that BFV didn't get a Eastern front expansion
Be happy u at least got a Mosin-gernade launcher.
We didn't get a proper navy or Italians.😢
bfv was an expansion its self
Bfv was made with PC in mind first unfortunately. The UI, the controls, everything literally felt off. Aiming was crap. Sigh.
I'd still buy it if it came out now
BfV was getting good when the pacific hit
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
I miss the good ole days of DLC content the only problem with that though was people were complaining about the pricing of x amount on certain dlcs for maps and new guns ( pay to win in a sense ) but yet here we are in 2024 where people are now complaining about battle passes I think gamers have just come a place where we complain about everything on all levels
PLEASE DICE… DONT MESS THIS UP!!!
Dice may not be saints, but the people who are responsible for most of the bullshit in recent battlefied titles are EA
Fair point, I’m just tired of the constant failure. For me it started with Star Wars battlefront 2015 and it’s just been fail after failure.
They already messed this, did you noticed AI art, ffs.
People said the same for 2042
Every single big game that’s been coming out recently have been flops, and every single big game that’s going to game out are turning out to be flops too. I don’t have much hope, but maybe Battlefield will come around this time.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
Because we got content, the amount of stuff that got added to 2042 in it's entire lifetime is less than 1 dlc for bf4..@@eamonncowan2839
Yup, it’s not a service, it’s a scam. Just and excuse to drip feed a fraction of the content of paid DLCs and charging goofy ass skins for the price we paid for full DLCs with 3-4 maps and several weapons.
If it provided better value these greedy corporations wouldn’t have ALL switched to it
Yes! DICE, Adults can pay for a better game with more content. Free to play a games as a service suck
@@samuraisurge I do agree that free live service games suck, but I just never agreed with paid dlc. Especially for a game I'm paying upwards of 70 euros for
Thus the honeymoon period begins
This is the most accurate statement ive seen in a while
for what? you didn't learn your lesson with the past 2 bf installments to NOT be hyped? ok be disapointed. like i'm sorry but your doing it to yourself at this point.
Wait until it comes out for like a month and see if its good. simple as. if you can't do that you deserve to have your money taken.
I would listen to a 30 minute video about the cosmonaut’s opinions on different types of sedimentary rocks
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand.
The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83).
I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
So you mean start listening again that is very praise worthy
@@MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL They shouldn't have to start listening again, no competent company would stop listening to what their customers actually seek in a product.
If a company built a car with no wheels and then the successor to said car came with wheels again, should they be praised like the second coming of Christ?
@@ToiletGrenade well unfortunately this it the video game industry the bar is under the floor
idm the lower weapon count. There are probably people who have been playing since bf4 came out that still haven't unlocked all the base-game weapons. Not many, but probably more than a few. I think the lower weapon count basically garuntees that once the first dlc comes out after a few months, most of the playerbase has all the vanilla-game weapons unlocked, and don't have to stop the base game grind to do the dlc grind
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks.
I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage.
I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
This guy gets it
Yeah I was fine with the respective default service rifles we got in BF2 lol.
I liked the way 2042 did it. It's simple and easy to understand. It's also amazing that I'm able to switch scopes/ammo types on the fly. It brings a bit more realism to the game.
Lol
Because of low skill plebs like you casualfield 1 happened
That’s why I like Counterstrike
Oh my some words!!! Don't forget Portal was a love letter to BF Fans and remember how it died almost immediately?
it would suck so bad if this game was actually good, but we never get to play it cuz real life WW3 happens lmao 💀
Remember when they said they were going back to basics with BF2042 but instead we got an empty game with very little content and no scoreboard?
@@John-Xlol Ukraine just launched long range missiles into Russia and Russia fired a fckin ICBM in retaliation so we might actually get nuclear war before bf6 😂
@@lumbagoboi1649 ik bro lmao we got WW3 before BF6 & GTA6 LOL 🤣
Give me the best parts of 4 and 1. One of those parts HAS to be the BF1 headshot sound. Loved it.
For me what I would want from BF1 in the new one would be the seriousness. The screams when one is under heavy mortar fire, or when one is burning alive, or is screaming for a medic. When a heavy caliber (like rockets and such things) hit the ground and dirt flys up and you see in your vision a bit of that wet dirt. Or that panic breathing when a grenade drops nearby....all that stuff. I really want goosebumps while playing.
The immersion and cinematic effect from 1, and the shooting mechanics of 4 = pure PERFECTION
That "ping" sound is straight crack for the soul
All the children asking for more bf1 is why the franchise has failed. Bf1 arcade trash was the literal beginning of the end for BF.
@@jonmacgyver743 yes, the gunplay was god awful especially for assault class. I fear that will be the targeted crowd at this point because ea is gonna chase the casuals money
What's that kratos quote? "Keep your expectations low and you shall never be dissapointed, boy"
relevant cuz all the soldiers in the next BF are gonna be femboys.
What's the Dewey quote? "I expect nothing and I'm still let down"
@@CAepicreviews
😂 Accurate
I enjoyed bf4 very much, but bf3, something about it. To me it looked more real. Then again bf3 was my first online Battlefield experience. I didn't understand at first but especially later on I had friends to help me and dude, the memories of laughing our asses off, getting angry at metro, everything. I made one of my best friends from back then. He treated me like little brother, constantly giving me hell but he knew when to let me know like hey man, it's all in good fun, I love you. It was a great time I'm happy to have the memories
metro was epic, same with rush on damavand peak
BF3 was peak BF to me. I got it in the late stages when all the dlc were just bundled in with the game. Camo choices actually made a difference and everything just flowed nicely most of the time. Sounded great as well, every vehicle has its own sound. To me, BF4 is just dark figures against a grey background when compared to 3 and 2. It flowed poorly and some vehicles shared soundtracks and the general sound was a little off. 4 had less vibes all together as well.
bf3 walked, so bf4 could run.
Bf4 is just bf3 on steroids anyways.
@@Vase94 BF3 was better than BF4 overall
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
Bring back faceless soldiers, men only, no flashy goofy skins(weapons and bodies). Bring back more naval combat, 1942 had drivable submarines, destroyers, aircraft carriers and torpedo boats. Bring back the commander system from BF2.
Hahahahahhaha you thought you could slip in the “men only” like a republican slipping something nefarious into a bill 😂
And the bot matches from BF2 with a separate ranking/unlock system
@@Watchme1212ah bringing politics into everything
Men only
@@Watchme1212
@@tylerhinson8497we all know what kind of person would say “men only”
Women play games too, and fight in war.
The only way to take that is as sexism, sorry not sorry. You aren’t a woman, clearly, so let me explain to you that they’re a bigger money sink than men. Take one look at makeup prices and tell me I’m wrong
Before any of yall think about pre orders or even buying day 1. Remember that " love letter to fans" which was a spit in the face to all of us.
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
10000000000% this a nostalgic trailer hyped up le epic is the first thing we fall for.
Not gonna fall for it again
Be quiet reditor
Yea this content creator is salivating over an artists concept art, as much as things change they stay the same.
calling 1 and 5 terrible is hilarious tbh. Both have their flaws, and 5 could’ve been better in numerous major ways, but both of those games were a good time to play.
Battefield 3 was the ultimate peak for the series. If it resembles even a bit of that I’m in.
Bf4: Am I a joke to you 👀
They both were the best tbh ._.
This felt longer than it was. Great breakdown and explanation of what we want. This is just my opinion, but BF3 had something that BF4 didn’t have. It was dirtier
,grimier, grittier, etc. BF3 was the greatest multiplayer game I’ve ever played.
Yes the gunplay was the main focus point. The weapon variety between all classes, not relying on gadgets, and decent map designs fit for most engagements. Sadly ea/dice has alienated players throughout the years and it started with dice La breaking gunplay for bf4 to cater to the minority.
@@johngood7619 You nailed it. The best rush vehicle in my opinion was the Amtrak. I LOVED driving that thing. If I had a competent gunner, easily top 1 and 2 on the scoreboard, and most importantly, a W on Rush. That thing was so damned good. So many people would just ram it into the M-COMM and let it get destroyed because they didn’t learn its strengths and weaknesses so they could keep it alive for an entire match. BF4 Amtrak was not as fun. I was so disappointed.
@@Echo4Paparespect to all amtrak drivers in 3
@@desubokudawanano BF3's Amtrak & UH-1Y Venom enjoyer, as an engineer, here 👨🔧I swear If I would've received a 1$ for everytime I saved my entire team, mostly solo, by obliterating main target on "rush mode" by sticking close to it via damn amtrak in a potentially last moments in those raids, I would be a millionaire... and that was hella fun, like everything in this game.
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
Battlefield 3.5 fr fr
No, just you always online losers want that. The majority of people want the game to evolve and grow, not stagnate on gameplay from 10+ years ago.
Also the battlefield “community” should be the last people listened to, nothing but the biggest crybabies exist with there. Go outside touch grass and stop crying about video games
Yeah call it battlefield 2034
@@Operator_gloomy3.4.5 on god
@Operator_gloomy bf 4 was better. So much 4 hate
Remember, no pre-order
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
the GOAT of 21st century FPS
Zampella is the only reason i still have some hope in bf
DICE gravitating toward Call of Duty and Apex gameplay/mechanics/skins at the cost of things like levelation and suppresion is what is destroying this game dude.
@@willnotwill7167 did you not watch the video? Zampella and his team know what they’re doing, it’s gonna be far more ‘battlefield’ than 2042 was
@@SkiivinI thought Zampella was head of DICE even just before 2042 came out? He might’ve actually contributed to this issue himself.
I just hope the factions are US, EU NATO, RUSSIA, China. and maybe Japan jsdf?
PMCsvs african warlords would be cool.
US is a part of NATO, bro. SMH. You guy's will buy this shit and as long as you do, they'll keep making shit games. Don't fall for it. Wait til it comes out and check the reviews.
JSDF would be awesome
US is part of NATO….
Japan should be the only nation with anime helicopter lol
This before another Lego video is crazy
Blame EA for dropping news on a random Monday
@@thecosmonaut4221Blame EA for ending Battlefront II's live service 😭
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
Simple, bring back class system and thats it..... Specialist bored as hell
@@adieraditz if they pull out a Battlefield bad company or 3 on us I’ll DEFINITELY faint on that cheese floor fr.
@@heatgamer7008 bad company isn't that bad, except single player
@@adieraditz I’ll be selling my soul for an other bad company campaign
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
The jet and helicopter physics were horrible in 2042. Chances of them bringing back the old BF4 BF3 gameplay feel are anorexic at best.
I miss the BF 2 , Bad company and BF3 days . I remember playing these games back then... 😥😢
BF2 was great. I dont think BF3 or 4 came close to what BF2 was. As long as I don't get anything woke I am happy. But, I am sure they will find something to put in the single player.
I never stopped playing BF4. I probably still won't.
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
I unfourtunately was one of the pre-order victims for 2042. This game has to be amazing with amazing graphics, amazing animations, amazing maps, and amazing technology before I even think of opening my wallet
If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!
Me too bro, I miss the bf4 medic days
No one going to talk about how they use ai for there showcase
Wait wha
@@thecosmonaut4221 You didn’t know that ea was using ai for there showcase?
@@funny-gv3ml oh I thought you meant the concept art was Ai generated
@@thecosmonaut4221 it was
@@Swaguleyholy shit you’re right
I quit cod like 2 months after mw2 came out and I’ve just been waiting for a new battlefield to go back to basics ever since.
You're gonna be waiting a loooooooong time
There is a reason why spend around 600 hours of bf1, go back to that formula
BF1's immersion and it's special classes (sentries and flame troopers) were amazing
What do you play on? I tried playing on Xbox and it was impossible to find a game.
@@BL_762 use server browser and check filters refresh
@@BL_762 on PlayStation I find games on most battlefields
@@BL_762 ps4 lol and i always have a match on
Better have a bf1 operations type game mode too. Conquest is core battlefield but I love the tighter map boundaries of operations so much
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
There should be PMC factions in some maps like there was ANZAC factions on a few BF1 maps. But they should be fighting for specific nations like irl
couldnt agree more. this was really annoying in 2042. they dont have the balls anymore to reference the real world because they are afraid to offend some people.
@@sanitoeter4743reminds me of when the Americans got offended by Medal of Honour calling a faction the Taliban. Such delicate little flowers 💐
Australia v China would be a hit. Theres so many unique weapons, vehicles, uniforms, maps, and modes like naval strike from bf4 to explore there
Don't get hyped... don't get hyped... don't get hyped... oh, no...
This is their last chance.
The only thing I want to see come over from 2042 is the AI bots to help fill up all servers, or (with strict and clear parameters) to play solo/coop.
Not just for the largest maps, but all maps. There shouldn’t be any reason to wait for 15 more players just to start a match, no running from one side of the map to the other without seeing an enemy, no reason you can’t find a game because there are no other players in your location or time zone, and it’s a great way to check out weapons and vehicle skins etc without losing stats. There should be enough data by release to make sure the bots are smarter too.
I honestly don’t see a downside to adding bots to any BF game as long as they aren’t literally encouraging players to farm them.
Modern era != good game
If they think BF3 and 4 was good only because it was in modern era, then they dont see the full picture
Remember kids: the last great battlefield (battlefield 4) had options.
There was class options. With around 100 basegame primary weapons for EACH class.
There was vehicle options. Each vehicle in the game could be customized right down to the machine gun. A scout helio could be suited to battle tanks.
Maps had options. There was no dominant objective. Some objectives were specifically captured with vehicles. While in other capture points, infantry wreck vehicles.
Versatility. A tank felt super overpowered. And so did RPGs. Nothing ruled the map. There was a foodchain. When certain things got higher on the food chain, people redeploy with an idea to fight it. Again, options.
Options. When BF1 had 20 base game weapons in TOTAL, and afew different vehicles versions. I knew it was going to be a "meta" type of shooter.
I'll be honest, I'm not exited about a battlefield 4.5, id be more excited about bf3.5 or bfbc2.5, most emphasis on bf3. Bf4 was good and it has aged well but I really thought bf4 was taking multiple steps back from bf3. it was a true masterpiece.
That nostalgia bug bit you hard. Bf4 was better
Not a chance
Haven’t bought a BF game since BF1. I hope this one gets it done for me. Didn’t even touch 5, played 2042 on a friend’s system and was disappointed. Bad Company 2 and BF3 made me fall in love with the franchise. 4 and 1 kept me hooked and I didn’t even consider 5 or 2042. I just want a good campaign again😞
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
so basically amerimutts vs wagner/dogwater pmc?
@@chlorhexidine2506 or russimutts vs pmc.
@chlorhexidine2506 u have an inferiority complex, as most of the world does with the U.S.A
US was EU, EU vs RU, RU vs CN, CN vs US maps. The only way I see Europe actually paying for a military is if they break away from the USD and SWFT hegemony, and it just makes a novel concept, like Tom Clancy's EndWar
@@NYG5 EndWar is almost exactly what I was expecting from this, setting wise. The deal might be a group of mercenaries funded by Russia and China, but they take on an anti-superpower cause instead of just an anti-western one. Might draw in more nations and bodies that way for them to actually have the ability to take on NATO in open warfare. BF2 also had EU in a dlc with a couple maps fighting China and MEC.
"We've been here before"
Sad Bf3 is losing its online servers hopefully the community will find a way to keep it going after the shut down
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
Since the initial reveal I’ve gotten probably 12 accumulative hours of sleep
@@thecosmonaut4221 ahah
With Vince Zampella leading it, I'm feeling pretty good about it.
Im delusional but I really hope DICE makes a bf3 like campaign for the next battlefield. A campain where you're not a super soldier, you're just a soldier telling what you saw and did. A game where the protagonsit is fragile like every human.
Please no more hero characters and stupid skins I can’t take it anymore
Game development used to be about making a decent game that was fun and bug free. Now its about making a game that they can break into bits to sell piece mail and an experience that's just good enough to play and just bad enough to incentivise microtransactions.
You forgot how disastrous and bug ridden BF3 and BF4 were at launch?
@@Nah5534 nope
@idiopathictendencies8453 Exactly this is nothing new lol The same complaints now existed a decade plus ago it took 2 years for the universally loved BF4 to actually get "fixed", shit i the remember constant whining on the forums about DLC prices for both. Big stretch saying game development "used to be" when the multi-player games we love never were to begin with
Do not preorder
do not get a sponsor by them
do not glorify before the full release
DO
NOT
GIVE
THEM
HOPE
They should make a battlefield Vietnam or even Korea. Maybe even both. They should also bring back the co-op missions from bf3
What a world we live in
People need to be reminded not to pre-order 💀
I would be happy with just an updated BF4. That was one of my all time favorite games
They need to show gameplay on the first day of the reveal. Cinematic trailers are cool and all but the trust in the community is very low and they need to reassure us that they can make a good game that, at least, looks like it plays well. As well as the tone and graphics of the game are appropriate with the setting of the war and conflicts going on. No more quirky dialogues like 2042 at launch please for the love of god.
The most excited ive ever been was during the BF4 beta that was 2 weeks of pure bliss ,the level design from outside in bright areas moving up into a tunnel system through old train cars where night vision and flashlights served a genuine purpose the sound design was phenomenal. Man those were the days to get something like that again with destructable environments would bring me back no question
People keep talking about how the 2042 trailer was great and how the game launch was a dissapointment. I'll tell you what's a good game trailer, the BF3 multiplayer reveal trailer. Why? It actually shows the game. Not some pre rendered ultra hype machine cinematic with tornadoes and explosions. Keep it simple ffs
Sick video broski. Imma hop on bf4 because of it
They're taking a gamble trying to make another Battlefield game in general after that shit show. I'm done caring about what EA does at this point. I still play Battlefield 4 on PC and it's a great game. It's exactly what I want. I don't have to wait around for EA to try and recreate it. I assume that everything EA says is a lie until it's proven otherwise. Even if they are making a Battlefield 4.5, I bet they're going to find a way to completely fuck it up and ruin everything.
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
man if this next battlefield can just make me feel the same way as when i played damavand peak rush for the first time, im in
Sadly those feelings are long long long long gone. Gaming needs a top to bottom crash and reset first.
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction.
I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go.
But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
Wasn't it "leak" a few years back of it just being u.s. and nato vs some random pmc group
China cries too much so can’t have them
If they can’t do nato verse Russia, china, Iran, etc… then they shouldn’t make a modern game. Using a mode up pmc group is stupid and over done.
Bf4 is one of the best fps ever made, bf4 modernized would be even better
V Still playing BF1 button
I hope people pre order it. Gamers don’t learn at all 😂
Battlefield 3 and 4 and 1 was the peak era nothing can replace that nostalgia feeling
I dont want to see a single "PMC faction"... Those are so boring.
All I've wanted from Battlefield is US based maps. Please!
No pre-order
You need to stop hyping this up. It’s just concept art
4:37 ''I can't identify those tanks from that angle''
Bruh
The grills on the back of the hull clearly indicate that it is future variation of M1 Abrams, thus it is American tank. Pretty easily identifiable if someone has played BF3/4 before.
How people can even be excited for a dice game i will never know
same way people get excited by COD game
They've made decent games at worst and peak at best. I might be a minority but i'm incredibly excited for this
@@mesuper455
I was incredibly excited for bf2042. I preordered it for 90$
This is my biggest regret in video game history…
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
@@epic8923A updated version of a game we love isn’t really that bad is it? That’s literally what most people would want out of a new battlefield
Was surreal during 2042 to argue with people, arguing that you didn't really need a scoreboard, that it's a good thing they don't have it actually
Dude ARE you blind? This is AI random generated photo, this has 0 art, this has nothing to do with battlefield. Ffs
im not the biggest fan of military shooters but its definitely what battlefield needs right now in my opinion
Remember: do what ever the hell you want. Idc
All I want from DICE is 1942 remastered and BC3. Not to much to ask. 🤷🏼♂️
If i don't get those, I'm not buying another BF game.
we MIGHT be back bros
The difference about this coming from Vince is that he has never missed on any game he has released. Zero. This is what gives me hope for the outcome of this game. Vince was Activision's golden child until they got greedy after MW2 and started to control his creativity over Call of Duty, and EA gives him free reign to do whatever he wants creativity wise, thats why he works at EA. I think he's about to turn Battlefield into his new legacy game, since COD was his baby.
Here's a list of the games he's produced:
Medal of honor: Allied Assault
Call of Duty 1
Call of Duty 2
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
Titanfall
Titanfall 2
Apex Legends
Jedi - Fallen Order
Jedi - Survivor
EA DICE Sweden's new studio director Rebecka Coutaz, also has some great titles she's lead back in Ubisoft, all titles launched without major problems. I think this new version of DICE is gonna mop up the FPS sphere. All of that old blood was uninspired and tired of making Battlefield, got complacent and egotistical.
Still, DO NOT PREORDER.
They say BACK TO ITS CORE!!! WHY KEEP MENTIONING WARZONE AND A BATTLE ROYALE MODE FFS - And on another note, Frostbite engine can't be THAT hard to use, the hackers know it inside and out that's why in an interview with RUclipsr GhostGaming they stated that they will have their cheats and hacks ready when the next BF game comes out - search for Ghosts video. FREE to play Battleroyale WILL kill battlefield once and for all and bring in all the sad cheaters and hackers, the dregs of the gaming community - A MAIN AIM WOULD BE TO KEEP THE HACKERS OUT leave stuff that to COD FFS along with the stupid skins and trinkets to hang on your weapon - it aint Battlefield!! Go on Dice f*ck this up...
Ghost Recon's new game might be the next game on my playing list then.
I'll believe it when I see it. I really hope it happens because my friends and I have been asking for this for years! BF3 & BF4 were the best.
Can I get a Battlefield/shooter where I don't see people with candy colored guns and weird costumes? Can it have semi-realistic mobility where the characters aren't flying around/sliding/drop-shotting/or whatever with stupidly high degrees of accuracy? Can I get a smaller player count so that it feels like my squad's contribution actually means something rather than getting steam-rolled by 20 guys at once when they finally decide to recap Bravo? Can we make suppression and MGs great again so that the sniper I'm lighting up doesn't just turn around and 1-tap me?
The thing is is that i actually liked the military sci-fi of 2042, id say the game is in a pretty good state rn. If they just made battlefield 2047 or sum shit and added a campaign and some cool tech with some new factions, and made the gameplay comparible to the old games like BF4 that would be great. (also no speciallists, I want to feel like a standard soldier in a war, also I want combat robots as skins for each class.)
Please Donald Trump
Please
Save me from another shitty Battlefield
My Opinion to revive themselves in 2 words "Bad Company"
Squad Member: REQUESTING ORDERS
Squad Leader: *Comma Rose* -> 'Command' -> *DO NOT PREORDER THIS OBJECTIVE*
Squad Member: AFFERMATIVE
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s pray they don’t mess this up
Time to get on the Hype Train🤞
Add option to let player custom: weather, day time, night time, dusk, fully destructable buildings, old + new guns + fully customization, bring back objectives that give bonus like tank spawn, AC-130 if captured, bring back the movement mechanic.
“I don’t want to die to this song” better get a call back
battlefield is long gone,they will figure a way to f.... up!
This mf gonna have a million subs in not time. Great work reminds me of tge Inside gaming days. Great writing witty af 😂
Says a lot when dice staff goes to work on a free to play game that has more player retention, destruction and depth than 2042.
NO PAY TO WIN
NO MICRO TRANSACTIONS!!!