Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
James Charles Controversy $$ Fallout & Gains, The Alabama Ban & What Happens Next Explained, & More
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 авг 2024
- Happy Wednesday! Lower your phone bill and get a $25 Ting credit at phil.ting.com
For the personal stuff follow me @ / phillydefranco
We are BACK IN STOCK, at BeautifulBastar... and 10% OF SALES TIL THE END OF JUNE are going to St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. So come snag our amazing Pomade, Beard Oil, & More!
Watch the previous PDS here: • The ProJared Problem, ...
Watch the latest Morning News Show: • Why Harvard Is Being S...
Need more news? Check out roguerocket.com for more stories!
Support this content w/ a Paid subscription @ DeFrancoElite.com
------------
Follow Me On:
------------
TWITTER: / phillyd
FACEBOOK: on. mqpRW7
INSTAGRAM: / phillydefranco
------------
Today in Awesome:
------------
Check out Chrono.gg/Phil for 75% off “Sundered: Eldritch Edition” only available until 9 AM tomorrow.
Rick and Morty Season 4: • Rick and Morty Season ...
How Spiderman Far From Home Should Have Ended: • Spider-Man Far From Ho...
The Dead Don’t Die Trailer: • THE DEAD DON’T DIE | R...
Honest Trailers - Speed: • Honest Trailers | Speed
Casually Explained: Tipping: • Casually Explained: Ti...
The Guy Who Never Left His Hometown: • The Guy Who Never Left...
Black Mirror Season 5 Trailer: • Video
Secret Link: • Video
------------
Today’s Stories:
------------
San Francisco Facial Recognition Ban:
roguerocket.co...
Controversial Bill Passes Alabama Senate:
roguerocket.co...
James Charles Online Apparel Shop Closes:
www.foxnews.co...
www.refinery29...
Previous Coverage: • Why James Charles' His...
------------
More News Not Included In Show Today:
------------
Facebook Rolls Out “One Strike” Policy:
roguerocket.co...
U.S. Officials Propose Sending up to 120,000 Troops to the Middle East:
roguerocket.co...
Sri Lanka Social Media Ban:
roguerocket.co...
------------
Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg
Produced by: Amanda Morones, Cecelia Applegate
Art Director: Brian Borst
Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Lili Stenn, Maddie Crichton, Sami Sherwyn
------------
#DeFranco #JamesCharles #Tati
------------
Don't mind me, just leaving these timecodes:
James Charles Updates (0:10), San Francisco Facial Recognition Ban (3:19), TIA (6:04), Alabama Passes Controversial Bill (7:52)
eman kocher ew
James Charles Just Touched You! 😦
👇 Click Here To Undo!!!
??????
Nice. ;) very clever
Oh but I do mind you Philip
I do mind
I wanted to unsub from James Charles, but then I realized it would be impossible cause I wasn't ever subbed in the first place
Reality is often disappointing
@@swimmingagainsttheti yeah, but that would involve having to sub to James Charles
Nice copy and paste coment 😄 But true!
I had the satisfaction to unsub and it was glorious.
Dagan Ward same I was like I’m going to unsubscribe right now and I saw that red sub button and was like damn
are you gonna leave this comment on every single james charles video
I got accidentally pregnant at 19 with a child that has genetic abnormalities. I chose to step up, take responsibility for my actions & become a single mom to a medically fragile child. Key here: *chose.* I love her but my life drastically changed & got very difficult. I'm Republican but not everyone should be forced to follow through with such a life-changing situation.
Thank you for realizing that the issue is with taking away a woman's choice. I'm a democrat myself, but I also don't like abortion and would never personally have one, but that's not my choice to make for other women.
@MaybeNextTime What do you like it or something lol?
@MaybeNextTime It doesn't really matter why she doesn't like the thought of abortion. What matters is that she's willing to step outside of herself and say "I'm not every woman. I shouldn't be making this decision for other women."
So if a fetus is just a clump of cells why didn't you get an abortion?
I don't care if I get a wart removed. Seems like it would have been really simple and better to just get an abortion.
Or maybe you recognize that a unborn child is a human being.
Because a choice you made will impact your life "lets just murder the baby"
Alabama banning abortions, even in the case of insest
*SWEET HOME ALABAMA INTENSIFYING*
Incest.
Normally you use ancestry to find out your family history but in Alabama you use Incestry
Alabama SERIOUSLY was cool with an abortion ban for everything INCLUDING incest? Congrats Alabama, you've made every Alabama joke 200x worse.
edit: Jesus, what a sad comment to be my first to 1,000 likes.
I think we're going to see suicide rates go up in Alabama...
@@jaydirt2006 And?
@@jaydirt2006 K, just wanted to see if you had a smarter argument to come back with. Guess I'll go to McDonald's instead...
Absolute Mad Lad Cannot forget that Alabama is one of the state’s with the highest execution rates! So much for that sanctity of life amirite?
@@jaydirt2006 Babies? I see no babies in this discussion. What I see are fetuses that cannot exist on their own without dying. I'd explain the difference, but I think your head might explode.
Don't understand how all these comments are about James Charles when the Alabama ban is so much more important?
The kids are commenting first
Alex Musker Indeed, so many lives will be saved by this bill, and people are just talking about some internet celeb
I agree! I came down to the comments to ear the opinions about the alabama situation, but everyone talks about James Charles
Well I THINK it’s because there’s a lot of people that always wanted to see James Charles eat shit (myself included) so I kinda get why so many comments about it
Everyone else is at work.
Whether you agree or disagree with abortion, it should NOT be the government's job to make decisions for you. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion, it simply means that whatever you choose, if i like it or not, is none of my business.
Yeah... Murder is none of the government's business.
@@DanoG-xf7jb Is it murder if the fetus isn't technically a person yet
It isn’t murder. Cus if you wanna go down that path, technically speaking any kind of discharge if semen from men could be considered mass genocide (I.e. masturbation)
@@DanoG-xf7jb
A zygote and fetus arent people or babies.
Yes a zygote is a person. Semen doesn’t have a full strand of DNA, once it joins the egg, everything about that person has been determined. You can be pro-choice but saying that you aren’t killing a person is stupid logic. The birth canal isn’t some magic person maker.
If Alabamans are so big on protecting 'life' whatever the cost, why do they perform more executions than any other state?
It probably has more to do with INNOCENT life
It's odd how they care more about you when you're not born yet, but stop giving a shit the moment you pop out.
@@incrediblygayAnd yet we know that as many as 4% of Death Row inmates are actually innocent of the crimes they've been accused of, and those same pro-life people still have no problem supporting something that kills innocent people.
CaptainMcAwesomepan That's false information fam. Texas performs more executions. In 2018, there were 25 executions in the US. 13 of which were from Texas. Alabama contributed 2 to the total.
@@incrediblygay At the start of pregnancy for somebody who has been raped we aren't talking about innocent life, we are talking about a clump of cells that started out as a rapists semen.
At the end of the day for abortion, it should not be my decision so I believe I should leave it up to the people involved. I don’t know their situation so I shouldn’t choose for them.
Sorry, to be respectful, it feels like a cop out. You at least care about the issue to some extent, as you took timw to write your post as I did
Victor Of Gryffindor He didn’t say he didn’t care, he said it should not be his decision. I respect him for saying so, as I believe it is the ultimate way of caring. It’s very difficult to separate your own beliefs/feelings and admit it’s not your decision to make for another person. My uterus appreciates his respect, too. Circumstances in each case are different. Too many people believe they have the right to choose for others.
You shouldn't then care about ISIS, you don't know their situation
@@SassySweetheart013 you are right that I accused his answer as not caring. However I have to disagree with the notion that there are so many circumstances that can't be taken into consideration. That's certainly not true. There's only so much of a difference in abortions. Heck, if life worked that way no one would be jailed because "different circumstances" in their lives.
As to the other point, it not about about forcing, it's acknowledging the life inside a woman and allowing the opportunity for it to live it's life
@@victorperez4554 You do not know every pregnant females situation, so it is very ignorant to say that there are not many circumstances that need to be taken into consideration. There are hundreds of things that need to be taken into consideration and massive life changes that may need to be made before bringing a life into this world. Though it seems most pro-life people don't care about the actual life of the fetus, as long as it's born right? Then their job is done.
Here's my personal take on the Alabama thing:
The humanity/person-ness of a fetus is an unanswerable question. We can yell at each other until we're red in the face and it isn't going to change anything, because that answer is subjective, and has to do with your personal philosophy and moral tenets: that is to say, it depends on what your personal definition of "life" is.
So I'm not going to talk about that.
Instead, let's consider a tangential situation:
Someone lies dying on a hospital bed. Both of their kidneys have failed. They require an immediate kidney donation, and you are the only viable donor that is close enough to make the donation in time.
Is it the right thing to do? Yes.
Is it the moral/ethical thing to do? Absolutely
Should the law require you to do it? Well...
That's a bit more complicated, isn't it?
What if you have a rare condition where going under anesthetic to complete the procedure has a high chance of killing you?
What if your kidneys have a high likelihood of failure at some point in the future, and losing one of them puts you at dramatically increased risk?
What if your religious beliefs prevent organ donation?
What if doing this procedure runs the risk of complications that could keep you in the hospital for weeks, causing you to lose your job?
There are a million reasons why you wouldn't want to donate. The point is, I don't think the government should be able to force you to give up your bodily autonomy to save someone else's life. Let the power of public morality shun and despise those who wouldn't donate the kidney, but to force someone to do it against their will goes against the very ideas enshrined in our founding documents: many conservatives point to the "right to life", but in this specific instance often forget about the words that immediately follow those: "right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." After all, what good is life if you aren't free?
The same logic applies to abortion. Whether a fetus is a person or not doesn't matter; that doesn't give them a right to supersede your bodily autonomy. You are not, and should not be, legally responsible for their survival. If you feel like your own morals compel you to save their life, then great, do it! If you feel the need to reprimand those who would choose to abort, okay, you're fully within your rights to scorn them for their choices, just as they are within their rights to scorn you. But don't force someone into a position where they have NO CHOICE but to adhere to your moral code, because that isn't what this country is about.
A beating heart doesn't make you a person now? OK...
+
Beautifully said. Additionally, I think that the toll that pregnancy has on a woman's body is also minimized in this day and age. Proposing adoption as the simple solution isn't so simple.
@@DanoG-xf7jb A beating heart with no brain function (ie a fetus at six weeks) isn't much different from a starfish. Also, we're about to go into that "yell at each other until we're red in the face" thing that I was cautioning about at the beginning of my previous comment and I'd really prefer we not.
I really appreciate this comment, I couldn't have said it better myself.
I'm still torn/leaning on the side of 'life does not begin at conception' but you're absolutely right, in that we may never really have an answer to when they are technically a 'person', and focusing on that argument is ignoring the entire other side of the issue; the right of the woman herself to choose what she wants to do with her own body.
I am an Alabama native and this abortion bill goes way way too far.
The government has zero rights to demand this much control over a human beings body.
@@emmy8961 calling an undeveloped fetus human is sketchy at best. Hell its no more alive than my seamen
I was actually scared to read even Phil’s comments. I’m a bit ragey about the subject. Thanks.
@@MrRushhour4 well all things are alive. The cell is the smallest living unit, living just as much as any person, including you and I. I think you're mistaking life in general with value of life
@@emmy8961 I'm sure many young teenagers who get accidentally pregnant, as well as drug addicts and people who just don't have the means emotionally or financially to support their kids, would love to hear your thoughts on that.
@@victorperez4554 I hope you are also arguing that we should not murder animals, or plants? They are made of living breathing cells, have their own neurological & system functions (more than what a fetus has until 5mo) who are we to strip them of their chance at life? If you are claiming to value "life", you must value all life, you can't just pick and choose what life is worth living as if you are god.
I am pro-choice. However I do believe someone can be anti-abortion for themselves, and pro-choice for other women. That is the whole concept of being pro-choice! You have the Choice to not have an abortion on a spiritual level. I don't understand how taking away someone else's bodily autonomy is justifiable in the minds of those who pass these bills!
Simple, they don't see it as her body. They want control over womens' bodies in the name of Jesus Christ. They don't give a damn about the fetus
Exactly. I feel like these outdate baby boomers think if they make abortion legal we'll all just be like "welp, i missed my period. I'll hit up the abortion clinic on my way to work". A lot of women keep their baby and it changes their life for the better. But alot of women can't or dont want to and it DOES ruin their life and ruin that child's life if they're born by somebody who clearly acts like they dont want them or they get lost in foster care and end up in crime. There are so many kids who are in abusive foster care homes because there are so many kids that i feel like the standards of a foster parent are lowered because of this.
there are women who dont want a baby.. they get pregnant.. and are like.. you know what... i can do this.
and there are women who get pregnant, kids is born into a bad life, abused, and lost in the system because after the kid is born, pro-life people usually dont care what happens after that sadly =( and the ones who do are heavily underfunded.
Olivia Davis It’s not about the women’s body though, it is about the fetus. Killing the fetus is what is debated, not whether women have a right to their body
@@demospolsion6539 You can't just remove the person that the fetus is growing in out of the equation. This is all happening in the context of women's bodies. However you want to phrase it, what it comes down to is locking a woman into pregnancy and motherhood whether she wants it or not.
If a woman gets pregnant they dont have the right to kill another body. Im all for a womans bodily autonomy as long as it doesnt go against another beings right to live. You can swing your fist in any direction as long as you dont hit another person.
How do I feel about Alabama, Ohio, our country in general, and where this could go? Terrified. Absolutely terrified.
Holy shit notifications actually told me an upload happened when it happened not 3 hours later
Enjoy it. But don't expect it. lol thanks for watching
@@PhilipDeFranco give it 30 minutes, it's bound the drop out 😯
Lel
Same happened for me I was so excited!
same. youtube is amazing when it works the way its supposed to.
The news about Alabama is wild. If a girl is raped by anyone, including her father or other family member, she will be forced to carry that baby to term? Breaks my heart for these girls.
I read somewhere that rape and incest had been added to the bill, but I could be wrong. It was a fringe source and Phil doesn't seem to have heard about that.
Lindsey B right!??? Like how can they not consider these situations when passing a law like that
Storm Reaper VII OMG! Then the pregnant girl/woman has to relive the incest or rape all over again when she goes before the judge! What happens when the judge stalls with his decision, pushing the pregnancy further along, and then making abortion impossible? Why should a pregnant female have to go before a judge to receive ‘permission’ to control her body in the first place? 🤦🏼♀️ SMH!
Killing the fetus does not undo that pain, and passing on your pain to the consequence of that pain does no one any good.
Grow up.
It makes zero sense to prevent abortions for rape and incest victims, especially when Incest leads to birth defects.
"This law is about expressing the will of the people, which is to protect the sanctity of life" ... Alabama has the death penalty.
Df Masana if you can’t tell the difference between an innocent baby and a guilty scumbag, I feel sorry for you.
Gotta keep their population numbers up somehow, right?
So you support not hanging rapists? The ones you sad clowns keep preaching about? God damn you people are so stupid.
@Buttered Lumps babies aren't being aborted underdeveloped fetuses are
@@Matt-ev7qi 5% on deathrow are innocent.
Hats off to Phil for being neutral, by the way. It's rare that a news service maintains its cool about such a controversial topic.
That's what i like about Phil, he at least tries to stay nuetral. And while he does make mistakes(cough cough, Smug Kid, cough cough), he does apolgize most of the time(except for that one instance)
@@dragonheart1236 smugkid?
In all honesty, the Alabama story is the most important topic. Fluff topics should be lower priority.
I agree, it's annoying that most of the comments are talking about james charles
Absolutely, getting tired of hearing about this make up channel
It’s Alabama what did u expect?
I need the fluff to help pad the important stories. It's easier. Less urdge to blow my brain out from the horror
Jose Ureste unborn fetuses aren’t babies. a potential life does not hold a candle to the rights of the already living mother.
So they want to protect unborn babies but have millions of children in foster homes/ orphanages?
How about help those kids in the system
How much help needs to be done until you think we should stop killing unborn children?
You know you can do both right? Like you can believe that killing unborn human beings is murder AND ALSO support foster homes/orphanages? These aren't mutually exclusive ideals.
They just want to make more criminals for their cop buddies to abuse.
@@Hitch93Hiker we can stop when unwanted pregnancies are not possible anymore. We need to first educate and colsult more to prevent too much and unneccesary abortions but banning them is the wrong way.
Joel Almloff You cant violate someone’s autonomy though. It doesn’t matter if its a potential child it still relies on the woman carrying it, and her autonomy is above that.
Just like a family member refusing to give you an organ that you desperately need or you will die. They are under absolutely no obligation to provide that organ to you because forcing them to is a violation of autonomy. With that organ you have the potential of life but its not guaranteed because what you need to survive is not guaranteed to be yours.
I wonder how many years it’ll be before American women go to other countries for asylum.
Our anatomy professor told us in religious terms, he was against abortion, but he was even more against banning it. Because he remembers a time it was illegal in our country and women would do it in secret, so he remembers a woman who died trying to use a coathanger to pierce the amniotic sack to induce the termination of pregnancy. The coathanger instead pierced the posterior fornix of the vagina, opening into her abdomen, causing her intestines to herniate through her vagina. That is what abortion bans enable.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, you know nothing about taking asylum in other countries or the causality, specially when the US has been rejecting most asylum seeking people when they came from war torn conditions
@@TheCatvolador /whoosh
They won't. In other countries they just randomly beat people to death in mobs for no reason. The world isn't as friendly as you think.
@@jaku8513 Can confirm, I lose at least two friends a month to random death brawls here in EU. It's also why we needed socialized healthcare; the amount of hospitalizations here is insane because of them.
Ahhh he threatened me with violence, now I can leave a like
Punch my throat daddy.
@@ike4584 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 xD xD
The “punch you in the throat” line must be weird to new subscribers.
Same as getting called a bastard daily : )
No it’s weird to all subscribers lol
It's also cringy af
@@broganmilne8588
How can you possibly say that with so many people demanding it lol. You dont speak for everyone.
Art of Swords was only joking mate
How about instead of protecting The Unborn, how about you provide for the children that are already here, the one's that live in the orphanages or in the foster care system. How about we take care of them and give them a better future.
Yes by killing the other ones
I find that most people who are pro-life are also against government assistance programs. They value unborn babies so much, but the second the baby is born - you're on your own! It's hard for me to wrap my brain around. So, it's really no wonder they also aren't concerned with children currently in the system. 🤔😞
Oh, we don't care about the kids after they are born. We just want to strip women of their rights and force them to have children. Fuck taking care of the kids after the fact.
Novel idea.....Why can't we do both?
@@Riplee86 It honestly feels like it's more about a desire to control women than it is about the sanctity of life. 🤷♀️
An unwanted child would NOT get love and protection!
Adoption exists.
@@meatsafemurderer7743 and is also EXTREMELY expensive for families that actually do wish to take on a child, thus, is not a great alternative. There are thousands of children that go into the system, not everyone can be adopted.
@@Kalisayswhat Conraception also exists.
You know what also exists? Abstinence. As fun as it might be the primary function of sex is NOT fun...it is reproduction. If you do not want to have children you should use contraception...or to be absolutely sure...simply don't have sex. Actions have consequences.
MeatSafeMurderer do you know what else exists? Choice. It has absolutely nothing to do with you if someone gets an abortion.
@@Starhung1 preach!
I am curious to know if vasectomies are on the rise with these bans on abortion.
Legit already scheduled mine. If I can't backpedal on an accident (cuz birth control isn't 100%) then I am just going to eliminate the possibility.
Backpedal on an accident? If you are not willing to take responsibility for your actions, perhaps you should stop said actions. I assume you still drive knowing full well that a mistake can take someone's life?
I'm not saying that I agree with an outright ban. I think there should be a limit on the number you can have and figure out a way to make men more accountable with it. I am wholeheartedly against late term abortion though.
Running away from your mistakes is not an option you know? Youll regret it sooner or later
@@benputthoff3820 I've declared myself unfit to raise a child. So if I were to accidentally impregnate my girlfriend, who also does not want a child, I would want the ability to NOT subject a kid to a garbage life because both parents didnt want the kid born.
Same principle as getting a disease, you would want to stop it from taking over your life. I do not want a kid to take over mine.
I see nothing wrong with that sentiment unless the government wants to step in and pay all the medical bills and time off for my girlfriend and then when the child is born, the government can take the child and deal with raising it. Paying for all its bills and food and strep-throat treatments...etc. All by not raising my taxes either or paying child support.
*EDIT* we are on the same page with late term abortions tho... parents had plenty of time to make the decision before that point
@@JayVon_Ro I am glad that you have decided to get a vasectomy. I think that men who make the decision not to have children should get one as soon as that decision is made.
That being said, no one is forcing you to have sex. There are very few things that you are forced to do at all in this country. I don't believe that anyone else should pay for something that you did, that could very easily have been avoided.
@@JayVon_Ro Well said brother. It's nobody's business what we do with our own damn bodies. Abstinence is not the only way to avoid pregnancy no matter how much bible-humpers wish it were so. I applaud your sense of self to acknowledge your capabilities in raising a child.
Just because my fiancee and I don't want kids doesn't mean we're going to just stop banging. We're extremely sexual people. I'm planning on getting a vasectomy since I don't want kids, and she wants a hysterectomy for a multitude of reasons (health issues run in her family concerning that whole business, and she doesn't want kids, being the two chief among them). If we change our minds we can just fucking adopt. Right now, we've too many health issues that run in our families, and we're too damn poor. No child should be subjected to either of those circumstances.
When studying the US Supreme Court, there are important things to consider. If the founding fathers vision is upheld, a supreme justice is meant to act on interpreting the constitution NOT upholding party standards and views. It is incorrect to see a supreme justice as democrat or republican instead they should be view as strict constructionist, originality, loose constructionist or living constructionist.
This means they should impartially look and determine what the constitution says literally or apply the constitution to today.
Legally if they were to uphold their duty they would see that the main point of America, their constitution and the founding fathers views was the idea of liberty and that the people of America would be free to decide their own fate, without a national or state religion coming into play.
Justices are also meant to follow precedent.
There is no legal reason why these bills should be passed into law because they are unconstitutional and undemocratic. Frankly they’re unpatriotic. As America’s you should look to uphold liberty and democracy.
I’m very disheartened at how far modern America has strayed from the founding fathers view. Very unpatriotic and hypocritical.
As a non-American I have never understood the supreme court. It just seems like they get to shape the country for a few decades, new judges are appointed and depending on who is in power either restore it to the way it was or just keep going. I don't think the SC was supposed to be used like that. Especially when they are very open about the fact they are partisan.
Shut up
@@mokrodog But why?
There is no reason to uphold precedent UNLESS it is consistent with the constitution. That’s like saying “Well because they did it this wrong way it should be ok for us to do it because they did it first”. So uhm you’re wrong.
I wish that you believed this before the scales tipped to the right, I'd believe that you were principled and readily agree with you.
Philly D: Hit that like button, or I’ll punch you in the throat.
James Charles: *Passionately hits dislike button*
while questioning Phil's sexuality
while saying "choke me, daddy"?
While hitting on Phil, a straight, married man
Hearing about us politics is always mindblowing. How are they still going over these brutal abortion laws?? Insane.
to keep women in their place. insecure men in power protecting the patriarchy
@@Mai_Food These "insecure men" were elected by women. As it turns out, USA is a republic. These insecure men didn't get power. Women gave them the power to protect the so-called patriarchy. Women, who are a majority, elected them in power.
Well you know Alabama, the more inbreeding the better.
@@experry3964 It's not that simple. A majority of women voted against Trump, yet he's still president. So saying women gave these people power doesn't pain the whole picture. While this law was signed into law by a woman, every woman and person of color on the Alabama senate voted against it. It was passed by 25 men. Just imagine for a moment the reaction from men if 25 women passed a law that restricts what we can do as men. There's already this false narrative in some corners that there's a war on men (and straight white men in particular, even though straight white men were who voted for this bill), so you can be sure that would be used as evidence to support it.
Did you see the flags? They are antiquated people trying to hold onto something.. bet they wouldn't mind undoing another law that a certain top that wearing president put into effect ages ago.. then again they're probably related to the dude that shot him in the first place..
Whatever your moral stance on abortion it should be legal to protect women and girls who may have a different stance on the issue and will still continue to get back street abortions putting there lives at risk.
My counter to this point however, is are then complying to a threat. Isn't that just the same as "if you don't do what I want, I'll kill myself"?
Besides, you still need to describe what abortions should then be allowed, and then we just come back to the same argument
Whatever your moral stance on genocide it should be legal to protect people who may have a different stance on the issue and will still continue to kill Jews in dark alleys.
Eugene Levin oh yes because a bunch of cells without any real consciousness is the exact same as people with families and lives. I’m very open to hearing other sides of the argument but not this ridiculous nonsense.
Rebecca Matthews So I am. The thing you seem to have missed is that I didn’t provide an argument. I swapped 2 words for each other.
Both are immoral, and one is obviously an exaggeration. If your issue is with the extent of that exaggeration (lying is immoral but it shouldn’t be outlawed), then in this case the problem comes down to the nature of a fetus. If your issue is with the wording of my ‘argument’ (other than the exaggeration), then it comes down not to the nature of women’s rights. Or it’s both.
If its the first (which it is judging from your response) you must tell me the criteria for human life. It’s a valid argument and one I will respect. If evidence is presented to show how fetuses and only fetuses don’t qualify for ‘human life’ I will be thrilled to change my mind. I don’t have political allegiances, am atheist, and would not want a child.
If it’s the second (regarding controlling women or that I’m a religious dogmatic) I will walk away from this conversation. I don’t respect arguments that rely on the premise that I want to control women or that women are entitled to control. Much like I’m not entitled to take my arm and punch you in the throat, there are some things we aren’t entitled to do with our body IF and only if it interferes with others’ rights. Therefore, this argument does not hold its own if a fetus is human life. And if a fetus isn’t, then this argument is just redundant.
Rebecca Matthews Edited for grammar and paraphrased. Sending this as a separate notification because RUclips doesn’t notify when a comment has been edited.
You know something has gone catastrophically wrong in the beauty community when even Phil is reporting on it...
no, Phil wants to fuck that creature he keeps reporting about.
He reports on the beauty community all the time. I don't understand why, but he does it a lot.
RUclips want you to be filled in with tea for the first time
@@bluesteel8376 He loves the RUclips drama.
The lack of physical self acceptance and pursuit of beautification for the sake and attention of others has grown to ridiculous and detrimental levels.
I actually really impressed with how you handled the Alabama law with just the facts and not editorializing.
I was raped by a grizzly bear and I simply do not wish to give birth to a wet/hairy bear child.. 😖
yup defranco cares more about his gay butt boyz news than imp issues , gossip gets more clicks.
It's pretty standard from him if you're familiar with his content, unless it demands for it, he leaves his personal opinion out of the story. And when he does include it, he draws a firm line that it is his own opinion and is separate from the story.
That is why he is great
@@jamesburgess2k I'm subscribed to him and this is the reason why. But I'm still impressed when I see news reporting instead of new editorializing. It's so rare these days.
Ah yes. Unborn children. So much more important than currently living women.
Ah yes, the convenience of not having to be pregnant for 9 months. So much more important than human life.
@@SubscribersWithoutAnySubscribe you ever given birth, then mind your own business
@@celinak5062 You ever been aborted? Then mind your own business
@@celinak5062 That's silly, Celina. Murder isn't justified just because not murdering someone leaves life difficult for you.
@@SubscribersWithoutAnySubscribe yeah, preeclampsia is a bitch.
Guess what, don't remember any of it. Like most I don't remember anything from before age 3. If I had died before the 9 month, wouldn't have been the wiser either way.
There are pets and pigs smarter than we are as babies, we put one of those down and the other, we eat.
We don't even need Handmaid's tale season 3, we got Alabama.
#handmaidstale #comingtrue
You know we really do take for granted how good you are at keeping your opinion out of the stories,
That Alabama abortion bill Story just reminded me how good you are at staying unbiased.
Good job and thank you
He only stays unbiased some of the time.
Other times he makes a good job of pretending to be unbiased and ignoring a lot of the realities. Venezuela is a great example of that....
@@Razorlust What do you mean by that? About Venezuela
@@Random_dud31 although it wasn't bad on him, he kept pushing the story about Venezuela because other news outlets didn't cover it or talk about it at all
@@merlink.7287 pushing a story isnt bias within that story, and really being unbias as well as your not denying or hiding facts, isnt really needed for the content he presents.
@@Random_dud31 In Phil's Venezuela coverage, he's been ignoring the vast majority of the situation.
For example, did he cover the fact that it was later found our to be right wing supporters burning food trucks even though they pretended they were left wing?? Or the Americans who are now holding the Venezuelan embassy in DC because of the actions of a criminal government?? He says repeatedly how much international support the coup government has, but never references the criminal actions taken by the US to put leaders like Bolsonaro (SP?) in office as President of Brazil, nor cover the reasons for the US embargo which caused the instability?? Or the general lies supporting the narrative of the American government's propaganda machine.
There is plenty of opposition reporting out there he constantly ignores, from journalists like Abby Martin, or not mentioning John Bolton going on Fox news and saying: we need their oil.
So, he's presenting the centrist version and the right wing version, and making that look balanced, while ignoring a large amount of the content.
"this law is to protect the children of The unborn"
Uhh how about we try to protect the one who's living first??
Well, just like the other retards that posed this argument, THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO BE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
How can you protect someone who doesn't technically exist yet?
@@OneManCast where in the GOP's agenda have we seen them advocating for both? They're the ones making it mutually exclusive
@@OneManCast
But these people who support this bill and say its protecting lives are also the same people who dont support Universal Healthcare and/or who want to defund Government assistance programs that are aimed to aiding children.
Alabama currently has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the country. Which only topped by Mississippi. And Alabama have one of the worst healthcare systems in the US. Yet Alabama representatives are doing nothing and are making the problem worst.
Quiet Courage they even rejected adding it guaranteed healthcare for babies 3 and under.
Jake Paul: 5 mil on RUclips in 6 months, never done before!
Tati: Hold my tea
PlaceHolder hOLd mY viTaMiNs
Like Paul she didn’t deserve the subs too
Pewds did well over 30mill in half that time
@@coqui9879 that made me laugh hard
Who's Tati what did she do?
The USA is becoming a scary scary place..
I also don't get those people who voted for the bill.. They all care for the fetuses but not so much for the mothers or for born babies/children.. How can they be like that..
Lisa Schuurman Fetuses can’t take care of themselves, almost everyone else can. Those who can’t are entitled to aid.
There, answered your question.
@@Patrick_The_Pure Abortion debate is dumb because two people debate over their own personal morals. Get a life. if the only thing you're saying is "you should feel bad", you're just talking out of feelings and morals and most people don't care.
Religious people have screamed moral superiority for decades, but people still separate church and the state.
@@eugenelevin9809 annnd women are taking care of themselves by getting rid of unwanted pregnancies. They can't do that safely by themselves, and thus require professional aid.
Where is the evidence that they don’t care about these people once they are born?
@@doubled6490 And we are better for separation. If the Vatican had control of it's old territories, be a fucked up world. Imagine modern inquisition to keep shit in line. If anything, religion should be almost and I mean ALMOST dismantled. It is useful to ward of "demons" per say, but yah.
I can’t imagine much good coming out of technology being able to recognize my face. Convenience is not a fair price for loss of privacy.
Kat Taylor if you have a smart phone and use any face filters on social media, it already recognizes your face
china already showed how it can go wrong when one of their government officials was publicly shamed for jaywalking when a camera saw her face on a bus
Drivers licenses are not the same as public surveillance cameras that see you wherever you go. And there is nothing stopping private companies from doing this
it sounded like the ban was only for government(?). And they already have facial recognition tools. I'd assume an algorithm might well be more reliable than officers.
@@victorcates9330 Your assumption presumes that the training data was sufficiently diverse to avoid issues like the ones Phil mentioned regarding error rates among different races of people
I feel as though I’m morally obligated to press like now that Phil threatens me with physical harm
Kyle Buonocore 😭
Same 😂
I like it. Threaten me philly
The fate of young women in Alabama is no longer in their hands, but the governments.
The most terrifying thing about the abortion laws and views in certain states in the US is that no one has considered that this planet in fact has too many people on it, and by limiting or stopping abortions altogether does not just effect the woman and families directly, but also has national and international implications.
Climate change, the waste problem, the plastic crisis, habitat destruction, the next mass extinction; all of this is effected by the demands our growing population has on the planet. These laws that protect people that don't exist will just exacerbate the massive problems that the rest of us face.
The US just seems so caught up in itself and it's politics that it is unable to step back and think 'hang on a minute, what the fuck are we doing??'. And that is scary..
Western countries are not the reason from climate change in the most part.
Asians are the main reason for overpopulation; Their systems aren't built for the amount of people.
Planet doesn't have too many people you moron. Stop bringing up foolish arguements to support killing innocents.
@@SSchithFoo You're right it doesn't have too many people. It has too many people who don't care about what's going on around them. We are killing the earth as we know it. The effects of this are already beginning to show. If we dont clean up our act by 2040 there will be irreversible damage done to the earth. Calling this a foolish argument is foolish in of itself. Over population is very much a problem.
@@doubled6490 so the rich western companies who refuse to clean up their act for the sake of everything I described above are not at all at fault? Nah. We are all contributing to it in one form or another, and the more there are of us globally, the more harm we will do.
Ugh! Right! I'm just thankful it's not the entire United States that has banned abortion.
fortunately James Charles will have the SugarBear sleep vitamins, i hear they help with anxiety
Lmfao this had me cracking 😂
Went for the throat on that one didnt ya😂😂😂
Lol
Oh shit. Lol.
That’s not even what he said, he said anxiety is keeping him from sleeping in which the vitamins help. Stop twisting words
I got a feeling a lot of things are gonna go south in Alabama.
Why did I laugh at this?
Ba dum tisss
HA!
Alabama is such a meme state. But not in a funny way anymore...
Half a year from now: Coat Hanger purchases in Alabama SKYROCKET
Why the hell is one of the poorest and most uneducated states trying to dictate what a woman can and can't do with their body? These politicians probably still think a stork brings babies through the window.
I heard stair tumbling will the a new trend on social media
Those alabamans care more about people who dont exist yet, then people who do exist
Smh I hate this law I'm glad I'm not a woman here now
@Genta A book that was written/translated by men for over a thousand years too.
Olly Sean “Exist” is a really poor choice of words. How doesn’t it “exist” if it’s there it’s there.
Murder, how progressive!
Not "existing" makes no sense in the case of an embryo. If it doesn't exist then wtf are you aborting? It either exist or you don't have anything to abort. I digress
James Charles looking in mirror: "I'm about to ruin this man's whole career"
crayhack I’m dying 😂
Yep!
Did you just assume "it" genders ?
@@Jenazad. i think you meant *it's gender
@@Jenazad. sorry im being a grammar nazi just kept reading it and it kept messing with ne
Breaking an egg is not equal to killing a chicken.
it is when it already has a heartbeat and brainwaves which it does before most women get abortions
@@jordanrichards3814 no male is allowed to comment on this matter cuz you will never have to worry about getting pregnant. not your body, not your choice.
@@WhiteAngelKinz your name immediately reminded me of white knight so i dont know if this is satire xD. No woman can ever comment about x male problem
Jordan Richards when did I comment about a male problem? Exactly. I didn’t. You really aren’t good at this are you
@@WhiteAngelKinz just saying in the objective of equality if men cant talk about female issues then women can't talk about male issues. Also it does affect men when a women could kill my baby without even talking to me about it.
Up until Ireland’s abortion referendum Ireland’s abortion laws were very similar to the new law brought into Alabama.
Yeah didn't a girl have to die of sepsis, before they charged anything.
Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy that supposedly every life is so special when it is in the womb but no one seems to give a crap if they need medical care after they're born?
Taylor Larson, no it’s simply the idea that people should have the opportunity to live. That two consenting adults who have sex should know the repercussions of their actions CAN result in a child. So why punish the child for behavior that two adults willingly participated in?
Or what about after years of child abuse being born into an impoverished family that can't watch you all the time and has to leave you with family members that molest you and young child shut down and don't say what's going on or the mother puts the blinders on because she's been in the same situation of generational molestation. I don't know I've been a suicidal child most my life I remember being suicidal before I was 5 years old and before I knew what the word was. But I feel utterly lost now that I'm an adult people discourage me from even getting a service dog which helps me take my medications on time because I'll tend to turn off the alarm and I can forget the dog also helps me go to sleep on time because there are times where even with my medication I can stay up till 2 a.m. in the morning and have severe insomnia the dog kind of keeps me in line. And there's a bunch of other things I can go into but the point is that even getting my monthly medications is hard enough I'm lucky that I have a great insurance this year. But yeah I know one seems to give a damn once you're not a kid even though you're a very caring good adult maybe not perfect but everyone so precious when their unborn yet no one gives a crap about you once you start turning into a teenager. It's the puppy phase we do it with hundreds of thousands of dogs and cats every year we kill them yet they have a cognitive ability of 3 to 5 year olds. we killed him just because there's too many and nobody wants them. It's a sad truth but it is there. I'm not saying I have the perfect answer I don't think anybody does which is why I don't think there should be laws made about it other than the basic kind of things like okay you can't do an abortion by just stabbing someone in the stomach. always wonder who's lobbying this kind of stuff because pro-life or pro-choice I don't believe any of the politicians care about people. makes you wonder about the child trafficking and if they just want more children in there you know it's easier for foster children and children who have been through the Foster program for years to just go missing. Many of them are written off as Runaways and have delinquent past because of the chaotic upbringing or at least an unsociable record
Taylor Larson Thank you for this. Yes...they hoot and holler about it when it’s unborn, but then they don’t give a shit about it once it’s out. They cut social services for single mothers, they cut education funding, they cut programs for children. I wish these pro-lifers cared as much about the children that are already living as they do about a bunch of dividing cells in the womb.
Who are you arguing against?
Do you think everyone who thinks abortion is murder thinks that the babies shouldn't be cared for after they're born?
Or are you just incapable of arguing against the whole, "killing a human being who is a live and bears a unique set of DNA is MURDER" thing, so you just decided to move the goalposts.
Well that's simply untrue. Everybody acknowledge's the healthcare system is screwed up but we can't reach consensus on how to fix it.
I would never get an abortion. Even under the most horrid circumstances, I don't think I could do it. But that is a personal belief of mine. My personal belief shouldn't have the power to destroy thousands women's lives. And it's really sick that so many people can't make this distinction between personal beliefs and others' free will.
Exactley, its this shit that pisses me off. Just because YOU believe in something doesn't mean it should have the ability to limit OTHERS.
Others free will to commit murder you mean?
Cool but not even when you're about to die if you continue to carry the baby?
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
So if you’re violently gang raped and end up getting pregnant with a disabled child you wouldn’t get an abortion?
We already have a population issue... how many kids are suffering cause their mothers couldn't get an abortion and not spare herself and that child.
birth control, abstinence, pull out. also population is at a pretty slow rate atm. and population problems are more of a problem in the east than in the west.
I don't have any real positives to say about tomi Lauren, but I will say that I was impressed by her determination to be a real Republican and stand up against those in her party that supported anti-choice legislation.
Republicans by definition are supposed to want less govt intrusion in their lives, but these debates are showing that religious fundamentalists among other outliers are truly mangling the core of what their party is supposed to be.
So, where in this video did you see anyone make a religious argument against abortion?
Or is that just coming from the strawman you built in your head to justify murder?
When the choice in question is whether or not someone has the right to murder another human being, then slap my ass and call me anti-choice all day.
@@christianfaux736 This is from Clyde Chambliss, a Republican senator in Alabama and the sponsor of this bill
“When God creates the miracle of life inside a woman’s womb,” he said, “it is not our place as human beings to extinguish that life.”
This was said by Kay Ivey, the Governor that signed the bill into law
"To the bill’s many supporters, this legislation stands as a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious & that every life is a sacred gift from God."
Good enough for you?
Coming from Australia a country where the abortion argument is well and truly finished, the ongoing US argument over this issue just seems prehistoric
How'd it turn out there?
Michael Robinett
You’re allowed to abort in the entire country whenever and however, except New South Wales and Victoria where it’s only allowed under specific circumstances.
Michael Robinett In Australia the reason abortion is legal is not because of some pro life vs pro-choice argument. Abortion is legal because women who want one are going to find a way to get one with or without a doctors help, especially scared teen mums. The result is backyard abortions and manual attempts to terminate the pregnancy which put both the mothers and the baby’s life at risk. Under a legalised system where abortion can be regulated and controlled, space is created for people in difficult situations to make the decision that is right for them and the baby when they are presented with options on how to proceed with the pregnancy.
Just think about that scared teen mum who accidentally falls pregnant, she scared to tell her family and puts her own life in risk with some backyard operation VS Knowing that termination is an option so she can seek professional help and go to someone who can help counsel her through the correct choice.
Which may very well be proceeding with the pregnancy and offering support with telling the family and providing her with options for adoption afterwards. I never hear discussed in the American argument. There seems to be this idea the doctors and nurses that assist with abortions are just out to kill babies and that couldn’t be further from the truth.
@@LXDV That's an excellent way of looking at it and a way I wish my countrymen would consider more often. Same logic I tend to use when the topic comes up, but... eh... Some people are just so wrapped up in their own myopic worldview they can't accept the reality of the situation. I'm happy for you guys, now if we can get some of that reasoning over here, that'd be great.
Alex
I love the way you think.
But not all people think that way, and that’s a real problem.
I’m pro-life, with the exception of very specific circumstances, and I’m sure these new laws will spark up a new debate over what they can and should do, and won’t do it just because.
But that’s my opinion, what do you think?
Wow Fox News?! CNN!?! James Charles' dream to pave the way for RUclipsrs to be in mainstreet media is coming true. He must be so proud.
damnnnnnn this is a good comment
Hmmm.... I'll probably get shitted on for this, but I dont think he's a sexual predator. (And I really never liked him!)
The waiter made out with him, then said he was straight. Gage held hands/kissed him, then said he was straight. He told them both, "you're not straight, you're def. gay." Right? I dont understand how that makes him a predator.
@@DubsTV93 why would you get shit on? Everyone has a right to their opinion. I honestly dont know how I feel because I wasnt there. I just think it's funny that he always claimed to be paving the way for youtubers to be part of mainstream and this is how he is getting that recognition. Lol
Because he has a history of preying on barely legal (and probably some younger than that) straight boys, or boys who don't have enough experience to know _who_ they are really attracted to. This thing he pulled at Tati's birthday dinner *in front of her family and OLD friends from high school* went too far and embarrassed her. This was *after* he chose NOT to do a PAID endorsement of her Halo products, telling her that his audience was too young to advertise "nutra-ceuticals" to them. Then he goes to Coachella and suddenly his viewers ARE old enough for another brand of vitamins. I mean, WTF? She _thought_ he was her *friend.* And yet he didn't even tell her that ad was about to drop. I don't blame Tati for dropping him like a hot rock. He deserved to lose her friendship.
@@calichef1962 he called a 17 year old cute. Maybe ick, but hardly predatory. And you say probably younger, but there's no proof of that! And the waiter DM'd him and made out with him!
I get the SBH thing pissed Tati off, rightly so, but he's not a sexual predator.
Abortions rights are human rights! Pro-choice all day everyday!! Thanks for talking about it Phil.
Killing your offspring is most definitely not a human right.
a woman doesnt have two hearts from what i learnt in biology maybe im wrong xD. A womans bodily autonomy ends when they wish to hurt another body. The law is essentially you can swing your fist in any direction as long as you dont hit another person
Gemnox - the child isn’t even developed enough to be considered a child
Someone shouldn’t be forced to carry a baby and go through the pain of birth when they’re not ready.
Sure id be easier to just not get pregnant but if you were to be raped and you were forced to carry a child you would probably think “it’s not fair” and it’s not fair
@@Kaelahsb But that doesn't make it fair for the innocent life, either. You can rage against the state of reality, the biological science of pregnancy and its 'unfairness' all you want; nevertheless, it is the way it is, and you don't get to murder innocent, unborn boys and girls just because you consider human biology 'unfair' to you.
Gemnox - oh but it is!
I feel sad for these girls that won't get the help they need in Alabama. Wow
They will get the help. Alabama will raise the taxes so the women get assistance for their children OR they could just put the babies up for adoption. Problem solved.
@@willn8664 you act like the adoption system is actually good in America
@@willn8664 I'm not sure that raising taxes or putting a baby up for adoption is going to help a woman, who has been raped by a man and is now forced to carry his spawn in her body. I don't think there's enough help for the mental strain that would put on somebody. Let alone if the man who raped her was her father/brother and she has to think about what ramifications that will have for the child that you think she can just so carelessly give away into a system full of abuse.
@@blondeinspired what percentage of abortions are preventing this example?
@@LeapingRat I'm not sure why that is relevant? Whether it's 1% or 100%, should a woman be legally forced to endure this, because her percent wasn't big enough?
As a man that will never have an unwanted pregnancy directly affect my body, I don't think I should have a whole lot of say what others do with those that could. Even if I didn't agree with it, I shouldn't be able to dictate what others do with their lives and bodies.
I hate ketchup, should I go on a nation wide assault on people's right to consume it?
Let your own beliefs dictate your own life, not your neighbor's.
eltontaylor162 yes sir!!
Thank you
Not saying this is indicative of my view one way or the other, but the common argument is that it is not their life to determine the outcome. So many would be fine with your argument.
Are you kidding me? You are equating ketchup with killing a baby😂😂. Never heard a more idiotic thing. It’s conversation about the moral fabric of the country and whether people should be able to murder or not. Not about no damn ketchup.. wtf?!?
Much respect man
I love that you still can't threaten to throat punch us without laughing.
Agent719 it would scare me if he could threaten to throat punch anyone without laughing lol
Pretty sure that's what makes it okay for him to say in his videos. If he seemed serious it could likely cause him a lot of trouble.
Shoutout to the beauty industry for revealing how toxic y'all are.
Edit; Being pro life im assuming Alabama has no death penalty.
actually they do have a death penalty and execute more people than even Texas every year. so, they could kill you for getting an abortion theoretically.
@@Pattaline1995 remember, "every life is sacred"
=]:^) yeehaw
super squid yeeyee
@Spartan0941 Like Jam Shambles said, it's not a baby, it's not even a foetus yet. Embryos are not babies, there is nothing to save. Period.
@Spartan0941 you do realize that the justice system is about protecting people and rehabilitation, right??? there is nothing about punishment and as soon as you see the legal system as just a way to punish then you're lost..
if you want to end abortions, go for the root problems not slap a one size fits all punishment on them. Just like you guys say with gun violence, or is that a hypocrisy that only the right get to enjoy? Cuz theres a lot of those apparently.. also what plans does Alabama have for supporting all of these forced mothers? Answer is none, they dont give a shit for anything other than pushing their own misguided beliefs (beliefs that are based on a religion most dont even believe in anymore)
Life is experiences, can you really tell me that a pack of cells has experienced anything that your poop hasn't? Dont terminate that poop baby, it's against my beliefs..
What happened in Alabama is completely unconstitutional. How can they even do this?
Alex Green the point is that they actually can’t. The purpose of that bill is for it to be appealed up to the Supreme Court so they newly-republican majority Supreme Court will overturn Roe v Wade, and effectively make abortions illegal.
@@kay1997ish Yepp, it's all just a shit show.
Unconstitutonal...rofl
You have no constiutional right to have an abortion you idiot
@@TimeForAReview Roe v Wade ruled that under the 14th amendment, which is part of the constitution since you seem quite dense, women have the right to an abortion
@@jilliand3713 Similar rulings also implied, earlier, that slavemasters had a right to slavery. That was obviously incorrect, and had to be overturned. So it is with Roe v. Wade.
Who else is tired of hearing about James Charles?
I have no interest in the makeup community what so ever but the youtubers I'm subscribed to keep shoving it down my throat.
me
Its whats trending and its popular to talk about drama and "tea" which is sad tbh. Society cares more about take down culture and drama rather than real life issues.
Me. I don't care about RUclips drama.
I was tired the first time I heard of that person.
Phil threatening me to like the video by punching me in the throat definitely makes me click the like button every time
normally i dont like it when people say "like this video" before i even watch the video but that throat punch in really enticing
It just makes me think I need to start wearing some type of spiked collar.
Lol! Same! Especially since he laughs at the end of it, every time.
I stopped clicking like, and he has never followed through on his promise.
Norwegian media picked up the James Charles story. That tells you how widespread this became
I did not know that it was possible to hate Alabama even more, sweet.
I'm honestly horrified by what's happening in Alabama. It's been said before by people much smarter than me, so I'll just echo it here: abortion bans don't stop abortions. They just limit access to safe abortions.
RavenclawCole and I’ll say it again too, Gun laws don’t stop shootings, they just limit access to safety for civilians
RavenclawCole, you are correct. Murder bans don’t stop murder. Does not mean we should allow murder which includes abortion.
That's not actually true, no matter how many people say it.
Anti-abortion laws actually DO reduce the number of abortions, and even if they didn't, that's not the point.
We have laws on record that don't completely stop that which they prohibit. Like murder. Just because people kill other people despite it being illegal doesn't mean that murder shouldn't be illegal.
When abortion suddenly doesn't kill a living, unique human being you can preach to me about rights being infringed upon.
It's really horrifying that rape and incest arent included as exceptions.
And Doctors get a much higher prison sentence then the rapist if they try to help the victim.
And some how, this coming from Alabama. Still doesnt surprise me.
RavenclawCole allow me to "safely" kill babies.
10:30 And who is going to guarantee that love and protection because we have 443,000 children in foster care without homes on any given day in America.
Forcing someone to give birth to a child that they can not (because of maternal age, physical/mental or financial ability) or do not want to (in the case of rape or incest) take care of just puts a burden on our foster care system, sending those children into homes of potentially worse situations than if they were hol' up in a homeless shelter or child care facility until they are 18 at which point they are on their own.
The other case would be for them to be raised by their biological mother/parent who was ill equipped to care for them in the first place which can damage them just the same as our foster care system.
People have this dreamy idea of the adoption system- that there's loads of people lining up to care for unwanted children but the fact of the matter is that only 4% of Americans adopt and I can't find a statistic on how many of those were foreign.
It has nothing to do with the fetus and it's right to love and protection because if that were the case, she'd have a large family of adopted children and so would all of those who voted for this bill.
So to your mind it's better to MURDER SOMEONE than for them to grow up in the foster system?
Fucks sake, i'm glad no one told my grandparents this when they abandoned my dad
It’s not murdering someone you twats have to realize that a foetus is not a human being yet.
No point in arguing with people like Christian Faux, no amount of science, statistics or ethics is going to sway such a virulent anti-woman person. He thinks that potential life should have more personhood rights than actual, born people, using appeals to emotion to make their arguments while calling everybody else triggered. So basically boilerplate modern GOP rhetoric.
@@maddi66515 Why not? Why in the FUCK not is a fetus not a human being?
If only legislative measures were taken to allow easier access to adoption here in America. They make it so expensive and very difficult to be allowed to adopt that most people adopt from outside the US. Fix that and you would see more adoptions vs foster parents that abuse the system, take too many children in, and get paid off of each kid they house
You afford more body otonomy rights to a corps than to women over their own bodies.... CORPSES HAVE MORE RIGHTS.... I don't really think more needs to be said.
first off learn to spell
second off who in the right mind would ever consider a unborn child a corpse
@@richardsantos5981 No, this person is saying that corpses have more rights than women. You can't remove a corpse's organs without the consent of the person when they were alive.
@@randomhuman5374Last I checked you can't remove a womans organs without her permission either. Regardless a baby isn't an organ. Its also not part of the mother. Just because it is inside of the mother until it is born does not mean it's not seperate and distinct. It has a right to self determination. To give the woman the right to kill the unborn child is to dismiss the rights of the child.
@@meatsafemurderer7743 The whole point is that you have the right to say how your organs are used. If someone doesn't want their womb used to host a pregnancy, NOBODY should have the right to force that pregnancy to continue.
@@adriannavanoyen If someone doesn't want their womb used to host a pregnancy then they should be taking steps to prevent the pregnancy from occurring in the first place. Once the child is concieved NOBODY should have the right to take that child's life. If someone kills the mother it's a double homicide...regardless of whether or not the killer knew the woman was pregnant...yet if a woman kills the child it's not considered a homicide?
I'm over the James drama now, he's got the point by now surely
He'll be fine. People's memories are short...those subscribers will be back in the fold in no time...just watch. I don't care, either way, since I know of them but don't follow them. People like drama but get bored easily. They will move onto the next bit of drama in 4...3...2...
Who is going to take care of these unwanted babies? The state? The taxpayer?
The adoptive parents.
@@waaakeup69 lol you are naive
Kelsey Anna and the 100,00 kids currently waiting to be adopted?
It’s good that you’re concerned about the foster care system, because it is a badly broken system. When we’re discussing it in the context of abortion though, it’s important to recognize that there are different kinds of adoptions. When a pregnant woman chooses adoption she gets connected with an agency that helps her place the child with a loving family. This child is not put into the foster care system, but is adopted from birth. In contrast, in a foster care situation, children have been removed from the custody of their parents and are waiting to be returned to their parents, other relatives, or to be adopted by a different family. So while adoptions may occur in both situations, they are taking place in two entirely separate systems.
@@waaakeup69 adoption assistance is an often used choice parents with different intentions have when they want to adopt a kid. I have two friends who are adopted, their parents still get help and money from the government because of adoption assistance, and these parents have used it to buy just about everything except for their child's needs. I checked for Alabama's law as well, it's the same deal.
Throat punch? My only weakness!
*Likes video
MangakasDream This literally had me laugh out loud 🤣🤣🤣♥️
Branded By Lola deadass🤣
Michael De Jesus 😩🤣🤣🤣
Youd think folks in alabama understood that an "accident" child has far more greater risk of becoming a danger to the rest of society if their parents just stop caring. Not even mentioning how much it can "compromise" parents mental health
63% of pregnancies are unplanned you idiot
Having watched my country put the important topic of abortion to a referendum last year and seeing the value of the people and not politicians deciding our country's future, I find it crazy to see the US heading in this new direction.
I'm slowly losing hope that America can turn itself around and reflect the will of the people and when it does, it's through misinformation and convincing folks to vote against their self interests.
Sadly this isn't a new direction. These debates on abortion laws have been going on for decades. When we take a step forward there's always five steps back. Between the constant bickering amongst each political party, spread of misinformation, and old fashioned out dated beliefs nothing can ever get accomplished. Welcome to America 🇺🇸
How much does religion control your country? I imagine that has a lot to do with it. Christianity is ingrained in every piece of American culture. They used the Bible to defend slavery and discrimination against the LGBT+ community. They’ll use the Bible again and again as an excuse to abuse their power and push people down.
@@ElpSmith Since this country was founded its always had close ties to the Christian faith. Usually it's only to justify a political agenda that shouldn't be a thing such as anti LGBT sentiments, hate speech, and severe hatred for abortion. I live in the bible belt of the U.S.A. where religion is a driving factor in pretty much everything. There is no room to grow because alot of people's mindsets are stuck in the past.
@@ElpSmith ...I'm Irish. We were arguably the most ardent Christian nation and yet, have abandoned allowing the church's minority holding to dictate the behaviour of the many. The US is now objectively broken as a democracy.
Between Gerrymandering and voter suppression, the US would fail many of the tests they use to assess fair elections in foreign countries.
I think James' reputation is damaged beyond repair. And by the time people get over it, someone will have taken his place.
Not really. He's not really over. I think he'll bounce back a few months later. But not on the same momentum he used to have. He might lose a few millions now and people might think his career is over but people will forget why they cancel him in the first place. People will move past it once the tea getting cold. I mean look at Jake, Logan Paul, Gabriel Zamora, Laura Lee & etc..they still around just not as powerful as they used to be. (I'm not his supporter btw. Just an observer)
10:10 "protect the sanctity of life" but the same state has capital punishment.... lolololololol
Please find me an unborn child that has committed a heinous crime.
And? You can be pro-life and also be pro-capital punishment. One is an innocent living soul and another is someone who had a chance but decided to throw that all away.
@@ChickenBiscuits thats not being pro life, thats just being anti abortion.
@@krich451 the pro life position is to preserve the life of the innocent. Capital punishment is still very much on the table.
Nerb1 lol
The LAST thing we need to do is save unwanted lives, the world's over populated as it is!
Denise Batres truth
Conservative Christians forget that we are a democracy, not a theocracy.
These conservative Christians only make laws that suit them exclusively. It seems like that don't care about any other people (not very biblical).
We're actually a democratic republic nation. Don't worry, common mistake.
Ohhhhhh!!! we want to protect the life of the children that haven't been born yet. But if you and your kids don't have health insurance, a place to live, access to education or food; That isn't our business:( I really don't understand.
I'll never understand their hypocrisy. You are exactly right. Once the babies are born, they don't concern themselves with their wellbeing. 😞
Wouldn't the solution then to be taking care of children at all stages of life, instead of killing them before birth?
@@AJStamand sure why not. it is my belief that abortion should be legal but it should also be a last resort. if there was some kind of program that helps disadvantaged mothers i think abortion rates would go down. unfortunately, there isn't and there never will be.
@@fernie6299 I agree. One idea that has been floating around is to begin child support with conception as well. A father is just as responsible, and surely that would help mothers care for their children.
If your kids don't have those things, it sounds like you are a bad parent. It's not the governments job to be an adult for you. lol
8:22 Reason why it doesn't make exceptions in the case of incest is because Alabama.
captain google because most of that state likes to keep it in the family.
Under rated comment.
Georgia has that exception but the media wasn't happy with it.
Uncle daddy, uncle daddy
Sweeeeeeeet home Alabama
I used to follow Tati...Before the crying vitamin video, Tati published another video expressing her concerns about the stability of her channel and amount of followers she had. Why? Because she was going to publish content less frequently and she feared that maybe that was going to hurt her channel.... Then the vitamin tantrum video got published. As soon as this happened, I stopped following her. To make such a crying ranting tantrum video over having a friend working with other businesses or competitors is not just wrong but also out of line...(also so convenient to bring drama to her channel and get way more exposure for her business and to get followers)... Its business, imho your friend can support your business and another businesses too. If your product is good, it will speak by its own!! I found very toxic, how she was telling us that that was friendship betrayal. It is toxic that if you help someone as a friend or mentor, you have to rub every single thing you did for them on their face. When you truly mean well and do something for someone else, you do it without expecting things in return; without expecting eternal loyalty and some sort of ownership on them. As a friend or future mother figure, there is a lot to be desired on how she should have behaved overall... You dont expose and trash someone else career like this, when the person was someone you truly deeply cared about!! At this point, I think she mentored him and expected to keep him under her wing, always expecting something in return. And because she could not control completely James to fullfill the 'crazy transactional loyalty' terms she imposed... Then Tati did this out of spice to teach James a 'lesson'....A good mentor and friend would not have created this situation, nor react to their mentee like this either. Very
dissapointed on your behaviour Tati...
The abortion laws are like Buck v Bell where just as recently as 2010 women were forcibly sterilized. Honestly we need to work on our justice system and what laws are still in use.
Please bring these stories to the public.
@Spartan0941 You don't have a right to force another to carry your life. If you required an organ transplant to live, the government cannot force a donor match to give parts of their body to you, permanently altering themselves, just so you can survive. Women should have equal rights to others, not less.
In some ways I feel sorry for those being “canceled”. I remember what it felt like when I thought the cool kids at school hated me. I can’t imagine waking up and feeling the whole world feels that way. I feel that sooner or later that someone may take their life under that kind of pressure.
(Some people for some reasons totally deserve this. I get that)
I understand but like James WAS one of the “cool kids” but used that to his advantage. I do hope he doesn’t have thoughts of suicide though, that wouldn’t be a win for anybody.
@@gerardoancayan he might now with so many people spamming him with hate comments.
I think he gets it now guys lol.
Depends on the situation. The cancel culture happening to James Charles and Projared seem fair if the claims are true. Both are claimed sexual predators and I’m not faulting people abandoning the two due to that information. Tough to sympathize when one is claimed to be sexually preying on men and the other is claimed to be sexting and sending/receiving nude pictures from underage people in his fanbase.
I don't think what he did deserves eternal damnation lol. He did what a lot of people do when they're young except he's famous.
I know right, I feel a little bad for him. Monica Lewinsky does some really interesting talks about public shaming on a national and international level.
Is the Alabama flag seriously just a big red X lol
it's like they're cancelled or something
I mean, it's an upgrade over the Mississippi flag which still using the fucking Confederate flag. Which I guess isn't a surprise since it's also the same state that only abolished slavery in 2013.
I was an accident. My biological father was a messed up man who knocked my mother up and I've never met him. She decided to keep and raise me. I turned out to be one of the nicest guys you'll ever meet and have dedicated my life to helping people. I have saved lives. I AM one of the best examples of why abortions shouldn't be legal and even I think women should have the right to abort if they are not ready to be a parent. Over population and destruction of our planet by our hands aside it is irresponsible to bring another human into this world when you are not ready to be a proper parent.
However if she HAD aborted you & you never existed..... it's not like you would be offended by her not keeping you. Because you wouldn't be here. You ARE here & DO exist. Therefore you're grateful. It doesn't make a difference to a predeveloped fetus whether they are aborted or not. It only matters to humans who have already been born. Either way. Each woman deserves the right to have an abortion WHATEVER TF her reasons are. But Im glad you are aware/mentioned over population and how it's destroying our planet and that people should ONLY be parents WHEN they are ready..... I agree with both of those points.
I appreciate your coverage of the Alabama story
Old people need to come out of office. That's all i gotta say
Ikr
yes because young people know better. hahahaha. yeah right
@@tenin982000 more 30-50 year olds and fewer 60+ year olds would be better don't you think?
Yep.
yeah basically and at least we can be assured it's a guarantee... one day anyway
Whether you agree with abortion or not shouldn't matter. You should support the rights of Americans to be able to make their own decisions. By getting rid of Roe vs Wade, you're saying that the government has the right to decide when life begins, and you don't.
isn't science deciding when life begins? government is trying to protect that life (which is unable to make its own decisions)
@@LeapingRat well there is no consensus on when life begins in the scientific community. Everyone has different opinions on it, which is why it should be left up to the mother/ family in question IMO.
San Francisco bans facial recognition....while Alabama bans abortion in all circumstances...sometimes you gotta wonder how long before the people in California just say "ya know, we just don't wanna be in the same country as places like Alabama anymore!"
I don't believe they can do this. It'll probably get brought to the supreme court and rejected due to federal and judicial precedent.
I don't think we should be so quick to trade freedom for safety.
I 100% agree!
Thats what every tyrant and dictator says....
@@Samalanderable ya every dictator promises safety for his supporters at the cost of civil freedoms.
London has one of the largest camera networks in the world over 500,000. Filming a crime doesn't make you safe.
Tell that to the NSA, Gitmo and the people who put them their.
Supreme court needs term limits. It should not be a lifetime job.
That's a dumb idea
Stupid how the people can’t even pick Supreme Court justices, so I do agree that it should be term based
Death is a fine term limit. It's very conclusive.
agreed
To me it seems pretty insane that a president who's been out of office for decades can still directly effect policy through the supreme court.
I love that Ting is still sponsoring you. I got with them because of you like five years ago.
It is crazy me to think that these people believe that an embryo is more important than a human being who is already living and breathing
Are they going to protect the children once they are in the world? 🤔☕️
How does that affect abortion?
The state probably doesn't take good care of mentally challenged people, should they be genocided?
Marygrace Love But why kill someone that can’t protect itself ? Sounds like a crime.
Delonde Stan is that what you think you’re doing? Saving babies? Well that’s a romanticised pipe dream. It’s going to murder thousands of already existing women because you think a bloody clump of cells is worth it. This bill won’t stop abortions.
@@FlyingWonderGirl When exactly does it go from a clump of cells to a baby?
@@TheOwenMajor around 22 weeks. Once the fetus can reasonably survive on it's own, outside of the mother's womb.
So where's the legislation and plans for decreasing America's unreasonably high infant mortality rate, since the main reason for this bill is to "protect the lives of unborn children"?
Why wasn't this the first thing to get accomplished, considering it is actually constitutional and not divisive at all?
because healthcare isnt important to the gop. They dont care about anybody but the rich. Better healthcare would decrease abortions too.
@@GlowstoneWolf How would better healthcare decrease abortions? And because the GOP doesn't hand out money they don't care?
This bills stops the killing of infants. What bill can you pass to stop death in general?
@@gabrielonibudo5710 Its called birth control bud. Many women take it for health issues beyond just preventing pregnancy.
@@gabrielonibudo5710 Best healthcare is preventative healthcare. Preventative healthcare for abortions is education and contraceptives.
Foetal heart beat. It's arbitrary, may as well be as soon as you detect a foot.
I know, it's weird. Is it your heart that makes you who you are as a person? No. It just pumps blood through your body. Now, the brain on the other hand...you would think they would be more concerned about detectable brainwaves rather than the uncontrollable automatic functions of a physical form.
@@-._.-KRiS-._.- I couldn't agree more with both of you. Heart beats shouldn't be a marker we go by. We are not our bodies, we are our conciousness. The body is just a flesh vehicle for conciousness. This abortion law in Alabama is horrendous for women who have been raped especially by family members. It's an unjust law that will cause pain and suffering for many.
@@jessicamoore7730 Not everyone can survive a birth.
@@jessicamoore7730 If it were a pregnancy caused by rape then I don't believe any woman should have to carry the constant reminder with her for 9 months. If they carried it to term and put it up for adoption. Then there would be the possibility that the child would find out that they were a rape baby. Devastating to say the least.
Jessica Moore have you considered the fact that women are not brood mares? And that a pregnancy followed through until delivery can have life altering effects? Pregnancy is not the beautiful experience the right try to make it out to be: its taxing both physical and emotionally, completely changes the anatomy of the women, and can still poses a serious threat to the health of the mother
my mom told me about a program that covers food expenses for moms who cant afford to care for their babies, but when i asked her if it covered clothes, diapers, bottles, etc she said no.
heres the thing... YOU WONT SWING MY OPINION UNTIL I KNOW FOR A FACT that this govt will provide ALL the necessities for poor women.
to me, it is a womans right to choose. unoess this system can meet a middle ground with me, i wont budge.
even if the state provided everything for the child it's still unfair to make the woman go through all that a pregnancy entails. there is so much that can go wrong (not to mention these states have one of the highest mortality rates for mothers in the developed world) it's just not fair to ruin one's life to "save" another. Not all lives are worth the same. A developed adult who is contributing to society is worth more than something that resembles a frog in that stage.
Why should the government have a say in what we choose do to with our body? We are giving government too much say in what we do with our body. Look at the drug war for example. Look how many people die bc they use drugs purchases on the black market. The drug war has consequences. People are uneducated about drugs, how to use them safely, what dosage is safe, and bc their is no regulation on the black market you have no idea what substance you're actually using.
The same thing will happen if abortion is illegal. Making a something illegal does not get rid of the demand. Drugs are illegal yet demand is still present. Making abortion illegal the deman will remain. America tried outlawing abortion. Women died. Babies survived abortions attempts. Doctors went to prison.
I dont think government providing for children is enough. It should be a womans choice. Are we going to strap pregnant women down on beds and force them to give birth? Will women look for black market abortion pills and die bc proper follow up appointments aren't an option? Will women who have no business being mothers neglect or abuse those children? Too many unintended consequences.
@@nicelydone4846 buck v bell has never been overturned. also, the california department of corrections forcibly sterilized 150 woman from 2006 - 2010. the government always has a sy in what you do with your body.
But yeah a person that is alive doesn't get love and protection but an unborn baby clearly has more rights than living adults in the state of Alabama 🤔🤔🤔
Wait, you're saying it's legal to kill innocent people in Alabama?! You're right, that is unjust
@@AJStamand Their point
You
I mean at least they have a good football team... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 😁
What? The unborn baby is alive so technically its murder. Giving love isnt a fucking right either.
FearLessLion Z PREACH! pro choice isn’t pro abortion! It’s simply having a choice, which men have more of than women apparently
honestly: the possible abortion ban is freaking scary. i am so glad i don‘t live in the us.
lawmakers must know that banning abortion won‘t do away with them - it will just be making abortions much, much more unsafe for the person affected.
As long as it creates more criminals, they will create more crimes.
Abortions are already unsafe. Women die from abortions all the time. But when they come back to the hospital with internal bleeding it's blamed on that and not the abortion.
Mel S Scary? You’re scared that you can’t kill your unborn baby and have someone else foot the bill for it? Seems pretty fucking silly. Also it’s one fucking state, the people there won’t have to resort to metal hangers, they’ll just have to get in their pickup truck and drive to the next state over to have their baby’s life sucked out of them.
@@mcearl8073 A few states ate beginning to criminalize leaving the state for abortions. Look it up.
@@mcearl8073 Not a baby. Its a ball of cells. A seed is not a tree.
Thank you San Fransisco, very cool
All of these abortion bills make me so upset. I come from a Christian background, so I understand why people are pro-life, as that's how I was raised. But why is it that once you're pregnant, your life doesn't matter as much? I understand that the lives of babies are important too, but it's like your fundamental rights as a human are stripped away when you become pregnant. People have rights over their bodies for pretty much everything else, but all of a sudden you don't have the rights to your body when you're pregnant? Men don't have to do literally anything after a woman gets pregnant. Why does nothing rest on their shoulders? If we tried to take away men's rights, they would be furious, and no bills would get passed.
I read an interesting comment earlier this week about abortion. It basically was saying that in different scenarios, people have more rights over their bodies than pregnant women. The two examples that they gave were:
- giving blood. It's pretty safe and quick to do so, but no one can force you to give blood, even if it was going to someone who needed an emergency blood transfusion to live. That infringes on your rights and choices. And,
- organ donors. If you make that choice, then great, you can potentially help somebody. But if you choose when you're alive that you don't want to be an organ donor and then you die, nobody can take your organs. Corpses are being given more rights over their bodies that they can't use anymore than pregnant women.
Then on the other side of things, but the same problem, if women who are young want to get their tubes tied, they are told no. "What if you want to have children when you're older?" Why should that be a decision that others get more of a say in than you do?
I believe that there is deep-rooted sexism in North America, in more areas of life than just this issue. I think that it often gets ignored and has just kind of become "normal," and I think that people need to recognize that more needs to change.