MOST INSANE SET OVER SET POKER HANDS!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 июл 2024
- Help us to 100K Subscribers - goo.gl/Bvsafo
If you are reading this, comment...
● Watch other Videos:
► Bluffs Gone Wrong - • 3 POKER BLUFFS GONE EX...
► Phil Ivey Wins $2,200,000 - • Phil Ivey Runs Like A ...
► Top Straight Flushes - • TOP 5 POKER STRAIGHT F...
► Best Poker Quads - • TOP 3 POKER QUADS HAND... 
Развлечения
First time seeing hellmuth actually winning in one of these videos
He missed so much value. Some shit I would do.
Florin Cupceanu He still called instead of raising all in for some reason 🤦♂️
On the internet I’ve never really seen a truly good move by Helmuth and I’m not kidding
With the hand and situation in this video, there’s little you can do wrong and he still manages to miss a lot of value 🤷♂️
Jason lol he was afraid of the straight K 10
Generation Gabe Rettenmajer bet when the 7 came on the turn though, so it was obvious that the 7 had to have helped him in some way. If he had K 10, it would have been unlikely that he would have gotten a straight and therefor he wouldn’t have bet so highly with nothing, when it was a already obvious that Helmuth had something, and therefore that should have been an indication to Helmuth that he didnt have a straight when the river came. So Helmuth could have gotten a lot more chips if he had played it better
Jason Jason what do you mean people bet big all the time with draws ! Even bluff with them ! Played better ? Are you kidding me he played it cautiously. It’s easy for you seeing both players cards to say he messed up but you are not putting yourself in the shoes of the player period.
“He’s holding the nuts”
Itz_Bang_ hahahaha man you are funny you should be a clown for a living
0Beyonder0 k
@@0Beyonder0 ахахахахаха
Juanda had three of a kind now. Again. Again queens.
R.I.P'es to Junanda's tripses
Who else kept waiting on someone to suck out quads? Lol
Can of Paint hard to hit 4otk
@@dannarasoul2671 ya don't say
Danny Rasoul No it’s easy to get Quads
Phil's reaction is the Best !!! King of Poker
14:15 then repeat. No ads
Juanda had trips
Natsfan1112 hahaha.
@Mark Richardson why
Sick
Why ferguson have 0% in the turn if can have quads on the river?
Piotr Pojeb folded the 3
noone saw the 3 on the table being folded, so only the commentators knew
Same for the pocket 2. Had a possible runner runner 2....
@@supdeluxe because the change of hitting running 2's is closer to zero than one so it just displays 0%
Ferguson needs to learn that everything you do at the poker table conveys information
Cyrus Azad you cant be sitting back, eating a sandwich, playing on your phone
Sarcasm right? 😂
I’m waiting for the Set over Set over Set!! Now that would be totally amazing!?
Happened to me. I flopped top set, guy flopped bottom set. Guy with the overpaid turned top set. Guy with bottom set rivered quads and we all fill up. Stacks go in on river. 18k pot
Ryan Salamon that is filthy
@@Esoterik_NW
I am so sorry my friend
I needed a bucket after hearing that
That's disgusting
Corona has brought me to poker level boredom
First hand he turned dead on the turn but a 3 on the river would give him the nuts
PHIL IVY YOU SIR ARE THEE BEST !! I LOVE WHEN YOU SMASH THEM AND YOUR READS AND PLAY IS THEE BEST I`VE EVER SEEN ! MAN I`D LOVE TO PLAY WITH YOU
@game changer Where do you read that. His net worth is 125mil lol
Hes holding the nuts HAHA
Сколько не вижу Ivey вечно у него кулеры. )
Helmuth flops a set of aces and let's the other guy bet into him the whole time, and still wins the minimum. This goes to show how much poker and analytics have evolved. No way in hell is anyone check calling the river on that board today.
Can't believe Juanda had trips.
First time I see ivy laugh
Ferguson looking like the dude from Heat
I assume tony G told johny he folded the last 4 so thats why he got up and left.
jenn harman you beast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Omg Ivey’s reaction got me dead 💀
He had Scotty basically chip dead in this heads-up battle. Scotty had doubled up like four times just to stay alive. and then the one hand where Phil Ivey just KNOWS he's crushing Scotty .... he's on the wrong side of a set over set. sometimes it's just funny 😂😂
That’s the thing about Hellmuth. He’s going to lose the minimum on coolers playing the way he does, but he also wins the minimum in those situations, by overly slow playing. It’s to the point that he’s actually afraid of a bigger hand, and it’s not even a trap anymore. A gut shot comes in and he just flats because he’s that cautious, which I hate. If you want to trap, sometimes it’s going to backfire and you get check backs. SO WHEN THEY CLEARLY have a big hand you NEED to get the max because that way of playing is so open to get punished with lack of value. Not impressed here Mr Phil.
Scott Larrabee stfu
Yea one time I had QQ and the flop came AKQ oc and I shoved and got called by aces 😂😂
RIP
9:51 what would Hellmuth do in that spot lol
If that last guy had king 10 he would of shoved all in. Hellmuth blew his chance to clean him out.
I agree. Phil is better than that. there is practically no variation of K10 that would have played that board pre-river that way.
Let’s see what type of cooler this is...
Man what ever happened to Jen Harman I forgot about her I know she has a family now but man blast from the past
She playing world series of poker 2019
What was Hellmuth doing there? Why did he call? Easy all in
K 10
Should’ve raised turn in my opinion
vernon padilla careful but pitiful in that spot
You can’t raise turn if you want to keep his bluffs in.
he can easily bet (before the other guy bet)/raise (after said bet) the turn to avoid any draws getting there in the river. there literally is NO scenario in which the set of 7's folds on the turn.
can't be all loosey goosey
Can someone explain what was JC Trans 2% chance?
why isnt ferguson winning when a 3 comes up on the river?
Ch ûm
maybe they showed a 3 that folded preflop?
Someone folded a 3
Juanda had twips
just busted my tournament as bubble boy in the biggest buy in i ever played.. set over set XD so came here to know im not the only one haha
Are they playing with a only three 3s deck?
Damn Laak failed with everything he said in that last clip lol
Wow that's tuff
lol am I just high or why is buddies face blue.....I’m gonna loose sleep over this
to make your video perfect, you need more commercials.
Juanda mate...how did you manage to even get there
Interesting
If there were no more 3’s to come out why did Chris Ferguson have a 4% chance on the flop?
And then 0% on the turn
I was legit thinking the exact same thing, how in the world was there another 3 in the deck after the flop but not on the turn.
Top set old man. It's set over set.
Never hurts to see Ferguson lose now.
Why does the first clip have an Afrikan Fufuzela WC 2010 background noise?
Those cards were set😄what are the odds for all three to have pairs?60,000-1
It’s happened many times when I play live
" The river card means nothing for Ferguson "
Why ? He can still make quads.
maybe someone folded a 3
@@979rzv Yes but Ferguson doesn't know that so he still had ( minimal ) hopes.
The commentator however made it sound like that Ferguson would know, that he is drawing dead ...
Randy andy you’re mistaking the expression “means nothing FOR” with “means nothing TO”. The first one means that it does not affect his situation, whereas the second one would mean that it does not matter to him personally. Therefore it’s correct to use “means nothing FOR”, since the 3 was folded and his chances are 0%.
JOKER well your a rude one. I bet you have a lonely miserable life
@JOKER wow whats wrong with you man
Back door straight got there so he flatted
Ferguson didn’t care about losing that money, he just went into Full Tilt and helped himself to some more money 😐
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#truth
Are they playing in a bee keepers nest?...
Dan shak looks like Leonard from TBBT
Tbh greg merson and his set over set is the best, he had the lower set and won with Jack quads on the turn as I recall, nuts lol
Juanda had treeps. That's why he folded...
JC TRAN V BENYAMINE why was there a %2 chance on the river? He was drawing dead..
4:10 they go all in ..and both see each other...and also dealer ..do they have to see the 5th card ??? Ived seen other games where dude just leaves cuz they know they lost already
5th card could be 3 or king to make quad
@@nikesad9030 thats what I was thinking, was tryna figure out why the stats were at 100% and commentators saying he can't lose when he could if he got a 3
Edit: unless they saw someone else had a 3 and they never showed it
The commentator was right. The last game Phil was suppose to raise at the river. Rettenmaier bet big on the seven so he shouldn't have the possible straight at the river. Betting on the seven holding king ten makes no sense. No flush on the board. Phil read the story wrong.
i love you furyTV but im bluffing , following the outro
jk i watch ur vids all the time and pokerxpress i think u run both idk but ty for da vids
I didn't know Joji was a poker player
Question, if the last card river card was a 3, wouldn’t Ferguson win? 4 of a kind beats a full house
You're right he would, I couldn't understand the percentages here either. I think one of the others players must've folded the other 3, and the percentages hadn't taken that into account and were corrected when they realized that he was drawing dead. That's the only thing I can think of.
Full disclaimer, it's late and I'm tired so I might be missing a trick. Seeing as he goes from 4% to 0% after the turn the 4 changed nothing it's my only explanation.
Yeah I figured that must be the case, as I mentioned, but that doesn't explain why he had 4% before the turn, because he was drawing dead there also. So as I said I reckon the percentages hadn't taken into account the folded 3.
Fiddler thanks for your reply. I was a little confused
That's what I was confused about too
2:45
Can someone explain why Jesus had 0% on Dwan after the turn in the first one? Couldn’t be get quad 3’s on the river?
Ryne Morse maybe because somebody had the last 3
This happens often and I'm thinking the same thing but if someone else had the last 3 wouldn't that make Ferguson 0% already after the flop?
John Juanda folds the best hand to the biggest nit in the world. Jen Harman. I really don't blame him
Can't fold there. She bet $25k into 42k, giving him nearly 3:1 on a call with top set. Yes, he's going to lose to a flush fairly often, but does she have a flush here 65% of the time? There's no real reason to think that she NEVER value bets two-pairs or sets on this board because, as far as she knows, he might just have AsQx. Not to mention I don't think you can completely rule out bluffs here. I know you say she's a nit, but she's a professional poker player. She has to be bluffing this river some % of the time right? I think Juanda folding here proved he's a bigger nit than you think Harman is.
@@connman8d617 Haha. Good comment man.
5:06 is that daniel commentating ?
I'm missing something. On the flop it said Ferguson had a 4% chance of winning the hand, but the commentators clarified the last 3 had been folded. What were his outs?
devildog621 probably the odds that they would have chopped, if they run a straight on the board, i would assume thats it.
the odds on screen never take into account any folded cards even though the viewers know, its just about the same on all televised poker
Isn't is slowrolling from dwan with the nuts ?
THEADZBRADZ no slowrilling usually means taking a long time to show your cards after even tho you know you have the nuts
Jesus christ Phil with the flat call on that last hand?? Seriously put the guy on KT with the rainbow turn bet? JFC that was bad
All these Hollywood actors
Rainbow flop Had pocket kings on a hand turn was queen she jams all in I snap called, river a king. She showed queens
Somebody farted in 8:23 😂😂😂😂😂😂
In the first hand can someone please tell me what was the 4% chance Chris needed before the turn to win? 03:00
Shuntsam2 a 3 for four of a kind.
@@visualsbyst No that's not it as there is no 3 left in the deck. You see the percentage become 0% after the turn.
I have come to terms that it is probably a bug in the code that calculates the odds.
For the first hand, why are they saying the river card doesn't matter? A 3 gives Ferguson quads?
Bob Bobson I thought the same thing, my guess is that we didn't see one of the other hands that folded and had his 4th card.
Chaos Raven I agree with what you said. But why was Ferguson at 4% before the turn? There was no more 3 left and any board pair would have given Dwan higher full house.
@@chaosraven8255 Actually yes, commentator says at 2.50 that a 3 had been folded. But then, As Dengster888 says, why was Ferguson on 4%? Nothing else helps except a 3. So if the computer doesn't look at the folded cards, it should stay at 4% even after the turn. Strange.
Hellmuth missed played that hand so badly
Too cautious!!
Someone knows why in the first game, there was no chance of a 4th 3?
Because, someone folded another 3.
Wtf the probability
I’m a little new too poker, but in that first clip Tom dawn had 100% with still the river to be shown? Yet if another 3 had landed Ferguson would have taken the pot on a 4 of a kind 3s?
Exactly what i was jus thinkin. The commantators got it wrong to.
If you listened the commentators said someone already had folded the last 3
4:42 the narrator is incorrect, if the river was a 3 Chris would have won
@Viktor Blomstergren true but Dwan and Ferguson didn't know that, only the commentators did. They should have phrased it differently
Is Daniel Negreanu a commentator?
He has on some occasions
I'm a beginner in poker and I don't understand why c.ferguson has a 0% chance of winning before the river is out? If the river is the three of spade, he would have a four of a kind, which is better than the full house of t.dwan in ly knowledge. I can't find where i'm mistaking, if somebody could help me ! :)
How often do you folks run into set over set? Comment.
I did once. Made me a lot of money
Why nobody can get away from sets over sets ?
Wtf?! Are they playing with a young Bob Dylan?
The Ferguson vs Dwan hand, why is it 0-100 after the turn? He can still get quad 3's no? that's 1 out which translates to about 3%
Someone must of folded a 3
Arkadaşlar 4.dakikada yani son kağıt açılmadan elinde K K olan adam nasıl yüzde yüz kazanmış oluyor. Son kâğıtta 3 olsa ne olurdu? 4 tane 3 yani dörtlü 3 papazdan daha değerli değil mi?
Tom dwan could have lost if Ferguson got quad 3’s. So did have a chance when they said before the river he had 0 per cent, unless an earlier player had a 3 that had packed
the commentator says that someone folded A3 so there was no shot he was gonna hit quads there
You hardly ever see Hellmuth win big pots on RUclips. When you finally do he gags the river........
2:00 why are Dan's chances 0%. In theory, he could still pull a quad at this point. Unlikely, but not 0% flat.
It's less than 0.5% and was likely rounded down
The other three had already been folded
Anyone explain why the first hand was 0% after the turn card? What happened if another 3 came out, then ferguson would have quads and surely win the pot
Feldman folded the last remaining 3 preflop, therefore 0% to win the hand.
@@teebs90 Yes then in that case what was the 4% chance Chris needed before the turn to win?
hows it 0%win rate at the first hand when he could have quarts four 3s
I was also thinking the same. The commentators say he can't lose, idk why.
Because they knew the river card i guess lol
in the first hand the commentator says "Tom Dwan Can't lose" but isn't there one 3 left in the deck?
Not any more, pre flop fold from one of the players
@@kralj_stocara9821 when? None of the other players showed a 3... what's the timestamp of the other 3 that's revealed?
Sou único brasileiro
Kkkkkkkk que pohha de cara é esse com a cara azul?
First hand, did someone fold a 3? He could have hit quads on the river
Mello Mentoring I was wondering the same thing
Yes.. otherwise the win chance would be 98/2%. Trashy hands that get instafolded are known to the tv production, but get skipped on screen.
Right I didn’t understand why they put him in 0% and commentor said the river doesn’t mean anything
kondr7 that makes sense. Commentators should have mentioned a 3 was folded
Mello Mentoring 2:47 he says it
Way too many ads for this video, couldn't be bothered to watch past 4th ad break...
Marketme TV I didn’t have any
3:03 Anybody else feel like Dwan should have 3-bet the flop here? Based on his passive play pre-flop there's no way Ferguson puts him on KK or QQ which means the strongest hand Ferguson can believe that Dwan has here is KQ. Ferguson checked and then raised over the top of a bet and a call which is basically a declaration that he's incredibly strong here. So, given that Dwan's hand is so underrepped and given how strong Ferguson is saying his hand is, I feel like Ferguson snap calls or even snap shoves over a raise on the flop. I know it ultimately didn't matter in this hand, but there are a few turn cards that could have killed the action(an A, K, Q or 9 would give Ferguson a way to potentially get away from his hand). Instead of risking letting Ferguson wriggle off the hook if a scary card comes, I think Dwan could have gotten him all in on the flop. Thoughts anybody?
That was my initial thought as well. However Dwan called the flop-bet (good play) from Shak. And to first call a bet and then four-bet a re-raise on the same street would look very suspicious. Even for a guy like Dwan that looks totally out of line. Don't think Ferguson could have gotten away from his hand anyway, but Dwan's hand range would be very polarized.
@@Rodytur10 But, with Dwan just flat calling pre-flop there is no way Ferguson can put him on KK or QQ. He's going to put him on exactly KQ.
@@connman8d617 Probably yes. But Ferguson doesn't need to have 33. There's a small chance he's semi-bluffing or playing AK agressively. By taking the line ''call=> re-raise'' Dwan will give away information that he doesn't have one pair.
In poker
60 percent skill
40 percent luck
90% luck 10% skill
2% skill 98% luck
If that is true, why are the same players always coming out of the top? I say it's 80% skill 20% luck.
@@painkiller5657 bc the same people are always playing. Multiple buy-in at multiple tournaments throughout the year. A large amount of bankroll to win a small ROI if any.
@@deweykendrick1260 same logic. If it's just based on luck, why not just bankroll anyone on the street and not these same people?
hellmuth is a bad poker player who got into poker at the right time to win all those WS tournament. the way he played those aces, displayed his poker un-genious.
I agree, he's a damn joke.
First hand
On this flop with bottom set, no way you can get away
Dwan could have AA, AK, AQ, and KQ, maybe J10 or AJh
Thats way to many hands you beat
1:46 someone explane me!!!
Why is Dan Shak’s chances 0%,if the turn and the river would be 2s,he can have Four of a kind and beat others
I think it rounds the percentage from less than one percent
Maybe someone folded a 2 before the flop
QuestionableIdentity thank you)
Xoro Vaxh thank you)
Artur Petrosyan you're welcome aper
On Ferguson vs Dwan, could he not have pulled a 3 on the river?
I did not understand too
I know Dwan is a great player -- BUT every time I see him in action in these videos, it seems like he's holding the nuts while some poor soul has a powerful 2nd nut. You don't have to be a great player to win like that. And I don't even want to hear: "Yeah, but he got the other guy to go all in." Of course, the other guy went all in ! and he probably would have tossed is his house and first-born child as well.
Look at some of Dwans folds, thats where u see hes a great player
@@andrewdom2407 Okay -- I'll keep a better eye on that.
Juanda's fold was so stupid.