individual grains of moon dust are much sharper and more abrasive. The lack of an atmosphere also makes the day/night temperature swings more extreme. Both of these contribute to wear and failure of rovers
Actually, Life magazine had extraordinary colored pictures of the moon as taken by Buzz Aldrin from his command module and Neil Armstrong took color shots as well. The photos were amazing and in high resolution for the time.
'Breath taking' 0:14-0:45 Tycho Crater Central Peak reminds me of a plastic model that me and my brother played with as kids and we used to put our little die-cast cowboys and indians on it to have a 'battle'.In fact I can almost smell the green enamel paint we used to use to make them look vaguely 'real' just like they have done in this shot. I seriously think that they're testing the credibility/gullibility of viewers to see whether we've been dumbed-down enough to get away with a 'Mars-Shot'
At time index 2:53, just left-of-center, are two (2) monoliths (resembling shiny, dome-like structures, IMO) casting impressive shadows on the surface.... Looking top-to-bottom, the first "dome" is on the left-side, nearest the top and.... the second (and larger) dome is beneath it, at around 45 degrees to its right.... A clearly discernible path can be seen running about part-way between both monoliths. Surely, I can't be the only person to have noticed these monoliths.
I've read that since theres no wind on the moon, the footprints and rover prints from the moon landings should still be there! If so, it would be awesome to see some hd images of that!🌚👣
already been done. Google "LRO Apollo landing sites" You can see the lower descent stages, footprints, and a lot more. Hoaxters don't bother to find factual evidence. It doesn't fit into their belief system.
quadcatfly A single white pixel? Oh really? I suggest you try these RUclips searches: 1) LRO revisits Apollo Landing sites 2)Ultra Close Up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site - GoneToPlaid 3) Apollo 11 Powered Descent and LRO Imagery 4) Apollo 15 Descent Film and LRO Imagery The latter two are a split screen of the real-time 16mm DAC imagery AND the manipulated LRO imagery (side-by-side_ Notice the EXACT moonscape of both image sets? There is one major difference between the two. The real-time images show a pristine moonscape. The LRO imagery is littered with footprints and other artifacts ;-) If that doesn't seal the deal for you....NOTHING WILL!
If this video is real it would have been on the nightly news. Obama would be discussing as well. The fact that you have been telling everybody in this thread that this one video should end the moon hoaxers claims once and for all and no one has ever heard of it except you, is really telling. If it were real it would be the most played thing on TV. I think I've seen it. It's CGI, trust me.
2020 and NASA is more BS than ever and the world sucks due to a great awakening, now we're all going to lose the few rights we have under the guise of a virus that has killed less people than the regular flu. Can I please go back in time with you guys?
Seems like the craters are almost all from impacts directly from above rather than angled to the side. I would have expected more angled impact craters. That is, the craters are all too circular rather than oval.
Most craters will be round, regardless of the angle of impact. The release of kinetic energy is on such an enormous scale that it's more like a bomb going off than a simple collision.
Always perfect; all the craters are empty and perfectly symmetrical, none have leftovers or other debris or leveled bottoms from those famous spacewinds.
Whatever the circular shaped objects are casting cone shaped shadows in the center of the frame and up are - are very very interesting. Even looking with a hand lens and hi resolution I cannot get close enough, but it would be really nice to have some idea of scale...
1:47 The bright big crater at the center is called Surveyor Crater as in a clock at 4 o'clock is Surveyor 3 at 11 o'clock is Intrepid the Apollo 12 lunar lander, the trails of the astronauts' footsteps can be seen too as thin as fine hairs on top and around the rim of the crater. But if people chose to close their eyes they couldn't see much, still the proof is there for those willing to look for it.
There done. It took a year but if you rewatch you'll notice little dots on the Moon's surface. Those are the size of people for your perplexed perspective.
Now that is what I always knew could be produced with cameras, even as far back as the 1960s'. So what will be their excuse for the next round of grainy pictures?
At 2:54 you can see two Towerlike buildings or domes on the left side of the picture. Compare the shadows from the craters with these structures. There are also smaller domes near to the big ones if you zoom in. The two buildings are connected with a kind of way.
Very interesting, but frankly, I could probably be fooled by a big sheet of plaster dribbled with sand and with a few ball bearings dropped into it from above and a strong light source at a steep angle, and just add a good camera and some brooding music, and you got me.
at 2:50 you can see an object leaving a trail on left hand side and moves up some type of mining machine. its a dual print track perfect in every way. its not a rolling rock its a trail leaving a machine footprint track mark... just above where object stops you can see another base and construction with pipe like structure forming the crater at 12 o clock where it stops. look close you can see the architecture.
orange70383 Exactly. As a matter of fact this was examined, by several people qualified to do the math, and they determined that the equipment supposedly left on the moon would have to much larger than they were to be seen at all from that distance. I would be like watching someone from earth waving at you and as you zoom in finding out that person is the size of the Statue of Liberty!
And you're an expert on space travel? It happened. Tens of thousands of people worked to make it happen. We're not going now only because of politics. We could have bases on the moon, and might have gone to Mars by now if only we had the will to go. The technology is not that hard, it just takes money that Americans no longer want to spend.
John Agnew You're correct. Thousands tried to make space travel a reality but rather than admit failure they decided to fake it. And only a handful of them new the fix was in. The rest were fooled with you and everyone else at home watching. You don't have to be an expert on brain surgery to notice if a patient the doctor is operating on is a mannequin with spaghetti and macaroni as a brain. Or to notice he never washed his hands before surgery. These things alone can help you deduce that an event is fake without it being your field of study. Apollo is the same way. It just looks fake. No other expertise is needed to say that.
***** I'm a graphic designer and I own a small Trucking company. If you can use personal insults about me without a shred of proof, I sure can talk about what looks fake without proof. I don't need proof to state what looks staged to me. Even if it NASA decided to do the common sense thing like send a robot to the surface of the moon tomorrow and take HD pics of the Apollo Missions sites, that still doesn't change the fact that all the pics and videos prior to them look fake. They will always still appear fake. And they will never prove otherwise in my opinion.
Can anyone explain why the 3 clearly visible crates at the top dead center of the frame at 2:38 completely disappear by the time they pan down to the bottom of the frame? There are many others that do the same. At 2:38 you will 3 craters in a closely spaced row at the top. Watch them and play. WTF?
+ArJuna22 No, no one but the graphics producers at NASA can tell you why they thought that would make sense, considering NO OTHER CRATERS suddenly illuminate that way. I just watched a 28 year old Arnold S fist fight a 68 year old Arnold S in the new Terminator movie so anything goes.
.... Relax.... it's a 3 + minute video.... which means they could not possibly show us everything on the lunar surface, in the time allotted.... Clearly, they tried to transition (or "fade") seamlessly from one photograph to the next.
I realize the subject here is the surface of the moon, which does extend to the nearest horizon. Would like to see if they have pics of the stars in the horizon shots - if any. Are there links to other pictures from this orbiter showing STARS? please post.
@@johnturner4400 what the heck are you talking about, itys daytime?? daytime where, in orbit? there is a HUGE difference between pictures taken in a vacuum without the glare from any atmosphere to those taken under under earth's atmosphere. any glare from a bright surface would and could NOT affect the visualness of stars against the blackness of space in the same photo. The black areas off the horizons represent an unaffected line of sight through a vacuum and therefore there is no glare in those areas. You get it? You're totally misunderstanding the physics. I have found pictures of stars in the Surveyor V Program lunar picture archive showing stars that should have also been seen in the Apollo manned flights, but were NOT raising questions about whether or not we ever stepped foot on the moon.
reply to: Dangit don: You're not talking about the moon rocks that NASA gave to Sweeden are you? Cuz they had those analyzed, and they were found to be petrified wood samples.
All of you saying someone's an idiot because they are woke and aren't sleeping zombies that believe everything you're told are a bunch of bastard children with closed minds. I'm surprised you all don't believe in santa clause. More believable than some nerds saying they destroyed the technology to achieve the greatest thing mankind has ever accomplished, and that they could land on the moon with 60s tech and not even in 2020. You're all foolish as hell it's pathetic.
@doctoristina They have to fake it because a lot of structures,dense atmosphere and clouds......On many Lunar Orbiter Images you can find clouds and structures from buildings and so on.Thats a fact.NASA lied in everything about the moon.Many pictures are faked or manipulated but there is no doubt about that they did go to moon but all that faking has to do with the moon itself (much higher gravity than 1/6 and an atmosphere...) and the habitats and old ruins on it.Even in this new pictures from Tycho crater LRO for example you can find editing and manipulating to get things out of the picture.Maybe they made it often bad that we get a clou whats realy going on since the 60ties.Here some clouds picload.org/view/dcorcoid/clouds.png.html here some rocks ??? picload.org/view/dcorcoip/bandicam2018-11-0419-39-25-362.png.html
Would the earth look like the moon if it had no atmosphere? the oceans would freeze or evaporate, so it would leave the earth with the same composition as the moon and have the same shade of grey?
that is in color....if its not in color when you look at it from the ground... its probably not gon' be in color in a photo....so... photograph... big word for a small brain... did your mommy teach you how to type it and where the p.h.o.t.o.g.r.a.p.h keys were?... or did she type that herself?
wow... i said that it was in color... last i checked.. that was the fuqin point...sure it reflects certain lights.. thats why the sun is apparently orange to us down here but its either white... yellow or blue (something i found somewhere on the net... either on fb or somewhere else but its not actually orange... supposedly) but i was just saying that if its not in color in your eyes.... its probably not in color on a color tv.... just sayin....and the first part of your comment.... " Funny How Someone As Stupid As You Thinks They Can *Talk to Others As if They Are."* this bit i did not understand.... "talk to others as if they are" whats that supposed to mean?... like i literally have beyond no clue what this means to take offence.... im like that dork on lord of the rings that said "what he be sayin? he saying somethin?" and then gandalf says "he invited us over for dinner"... and then the dwarf says...."oh... then lead the way!"
thank you for understanding....now can you plz rephrase or elaborate as to the sentence that i did not understand?...."talk to others as if they are".... you mean stupid? a stupid person talking to others as if they are stupid? could have phrased that a bit better but ok... i may be dumb.... but i am smart in areas in which you are stupid... though what those areas are.... i know not... so i cannot pwn your ass any better than i already am... you maybe be smart in math... i may be smart in spelling...you pwn me by telling me your phone number thru an equation and the answer is your number.... and i may look at everything you say and say you either spend too MUCH time keeping yourself looking good on your resume......or too little....either way... idk.... but i can tell ya you are probably not the greatest of ppl to be around in life if this is how u act all day.... me on the other hand.... i got nothing to do... so i try to be a cool guy... how thats working for me.... youd have to visit my house and talk to me to find out... cause i live in the middle of nowhere.... so i dont get visitors much... so i dont get to make much an impression on ppl...so.. yeah.... i suck... more than likely....
The moon is mainly gray, so it's difficult to see colours even if the photos are colour. You can see that if you look at the moon with a telescope. Also if you look at colour Apollo photos, like this: www.collectspace.com/review/apollo11_flag01.jpg
Art Carvajal LRO does have a colour camera, but it's lower resolution than the B&W camera. www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_color_2stretch_mask_0.jpg If you look at photos from the Japanese lunar probe, you will see that the moon is just gray anyway. www.space.com/images/i/000/003/336/original/080414-kaguya-earthrise-02.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=inside%7C660:*
Im 66 and retired ! I just watched a different video of the Moon , they were able to FIND ! and then SHOW ! the rover and lander on the MOON !! Do people really believe that MAN went from FIRE to that, just by lucky mutations ? or that man's brian developed to that point by chance ? I think MANs mind is incredible ! and had to come from something even more incredible that created it !
Anti-intellectualism easily latches onto anti-Americanism and/or religious fundamentalism. It's sad to see people so bored with human achievements they'd rather pretend they didn't happen. It's a sign of a decadent and declining civilization.
@aromardu It could also be the sign of major scientific breakthrough, where in history you can reference 'bored civilisations decline'! that's an interesting one I must say :)
Because some of the images that they are showing are assembled from numerous photographs combined with radar data to generate large 3-D maps of the lunar environment. That's why it's called the Lunar RECONNAISSANCE Orbiter. It's meant to generate highly detailed maps of the lunar environment for the planning of future missions.
+FosterZygote Well I need to see high resolution pic on the Apollo site and the equipment left behind. We only get specs that could be anything when it comes to that.
www.nasa.gov/images/content/584398main_M168353795RE_25cm_AP12_area.jpg They are high resolution and they are considerably more than specks. Remember these images were taken from about 31 miles away. That's like photographing a 1 inch object from over 1113 feet away. Luckily there is a valid scientific reason to one day return to the various landing sites from the '60s and '70s, both manned and unmanned. Engineers will be interested to see the effects that decades of exposure have had on the materials left on the moon, especially in the context of planning long term bases. But allow me to make a prediction as to what will result when Apollo conspiracy theorists are one day shown close-up photos of Apollo artifacts in situ. Most of them will simply dismiss these as more fakes, and begin scrutinizing them for what they imagine are telling flaws despite their complete lack of expertise in the relevant subjects.
The Apollo landings never happened. Why would they not show images of that first so we could see the most important human achievement of all time. And this may not be real either.
Omni Crenshaw * Thank You * I Agree With You * I Also Have Many Facts That Are At Odds With The Moon Landing Lie * Why Play Golf On The Moon ? ? ? I It Was A Roust To Help Trick The World * To Me , The Golf Thing Shows The Astronauts Were To Carefree To Be That Far From Earth And The Seriousness Of The Mission * Did NASA Take All That $30 Billion Dollars To Show Us Golf On The F***en Moon *
Kim Swisher Yes. A serious moon landing would have involved some mining expeditions and some stunning pictures of the stars and Constellations. And even if the camera exposure was an issue, they supposedly had several trips there to fix that. And why not bring a telescope. They were simply playing around. And you were also right about them not having enough fear being that far from home not knowing they could get back or not. And everything science -wise, in history that's ever been tried for the first time in history always involved animals doing it first. How is it that the most dangerous, most unknown, most expensive, and most highly televised experiment ever, was not tried on monkeys or lab rats first?
John Morrison You do realize stars have been photographed don't you? And the earth has an atmosphere. You have to just set the exposure. I'm sure NASA had filters for that. Smh...
>tranquility base If the shots were taken from 50km above the surface, even with 1080p HDTV cameras, I don' think we can find the base structure of the moon landing vehicle. (It's like trying to find a car from a jet plane.)
Man I could see several "tracks" that were of inconsistent directions and seemed to terminate at an objects which were tall and had elongated shadows. Amazing!!!
We can't at this point in time because the last pictures we had of the moon were from the Apollo missions, we've had about 30 years of the Space Shuttle program, and now our eyes are turning to the Red planet (Mars). So there won't be any colour pictures of the moon at this stage, unless plans go ahead to try bringing over some life to the moon in an attempt to sustain it.
The funny part was at 1:32 where the straight black line that was suppose to be the horizon suddenly became the flat moon edge where moon men fall off from. At least we've got an ice wall. Next time we're up there we should put up some protective yellow tape.
So what was so breathtaking was shown? Any unusual formations? New elements? Anything new on the moon we don't have on Earth? What bang do we get for our buck? The music was great. Thanks.
at 1:47 you can see a base and objects creating a path in the crater. two shiny metallic objects on edge of crater with paths. nice base with another object in crater to left
That's the Apollo 12 landing site. You can see the lunar module and the Surveyor 3 probe. You can also see the astronaut's footprints where they walked around the rim of the crater to visit the probe and remove some of its parts that were brought back to the earth.
What happened to all those 'blurred out' anamalies from the Apollo missions? Did they all misteriously disapear when the LROs went flying over? How does something on the moon disapear from one photo to the next?
@IcoVir As an ex-stoner, I can tell you that simple things can be appreciated and understood at a highly profound level. Things we take for granted can be focused on and completely understood under the "tutelage" of the green guy. The surface of the moon, the vastness of space, or simply the difference between the sexes can all be profound experiences while stoned.
timefilm .... Are you suggesting that the moon is geologically active? The moon has been geologically inactive on the order of billions of years. also, an amazing impact of a comet hitting Jupiter was recorded with amazing clarity.... The comet was seen broken into pieces before it struck the surface . I am not quite sure what you mean by no impacts have ever been seen.
I'm interested in a nice quiet retirement home with a view of Earth. Who is the real estate agent? How much can I expect to pay for property? Are there any restrictions? Can I build a wall around my property? I hate trespassers. Thank you.
die hard Though our technology is vastly superior to what it was in the 50 years since we supposedly went to the moon, somehow it isn't possible to get a camera near these sites
They did. Google "LRO images of the Apollo landing sites". Also at about 1:45 of this video you can see the Apollo 12 landing site. You can see the lunar module and the Surveyor 3 probe. You can also see the astronaut's footprints where they walked around the rim of the crater to visit the probe and remove some of its parts that were brought back to the earth.
има ли кратера који су настали а да метеорит није одарио под 90°?Сви ударци под правим углом? Логично би било да је већину кратера формирао ударац под косим углом! Дакле,кратери нису настали ударцем метеорита.
Another batch of amazing photos of the Moon, in black and white...and the stars still cannot be filmed or seen beyond the surface of the Earth...or did I miss those photos, guess they COULD BE in color. The Clementine photos, the declassified film, the first batch, are in color and look like nothing seen before ....literally.
Porque no indican la ubicación del sitio y la escala en la superficie ? Estos datos nos darían mayor claridad a las imágenes e ilustrarian a nosotros los neofitos en el tema . Gracias.
The LRO's mission is to map the moon -- not to prove that the moon landings were in fact real. The LRO was designed to fly fairly low over the moon at an altitude of only 50 km. The LRO narrow angle cameras use rather small CCD sensors which consist of a single row of 5064 pixels of 7 micron pixel size, for a sensor width of 35.4 mm. The LRO's 7 micron pixel size is considerably larger than the size of the Airy disk produced by the LRO's 8 inch aperture 700 mm focal length optical system.
Great shots of the moon, looks like a derelict building site, any chance of getting a few shots of where Neil Armstrong and buzz lightyear had a bit of a walk about and planted an American flag, just to make sure
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
When you see pics taken from mars or venus surface, sometimes you can see the Sun at dawn or sunset but why NEVER see the sun in pics from moon?
Maybe NASA is hiding something from us? 🤔👽
individual grains of moon dust are much sharper and more abrasive. The lack of an atmosphere also makes the day/night temperature swings more extreme. Both of these contribute to wear and failure of rovers
You can though, especially if you're looking at Apollo images intended to make a 360 degree view or smaller panorama when combined
There is no atmosphere to diffuse the suns light and would probably make the picture just a white blur
. . . because all black and white images are false , and it was not yet known how to create a sphere like the sun ☀️🔆🤣 .
Actually, Life magazine had extraordinary colored pictures of the moon as taken by Buzz Aldrin from his command module and Neil Armstrong took color shots as well. The photos were amazing and in high resolution for the time.
No one can walk on the moon and no one ever has.
It would be phenomenal to fly around the moon, that would be a sight you could never, ever forget.
Amazing video! My youngest son dreams of settling on the moon someday.
'Breath taking' 0:14-0:45 Tycho Crater Central Peak reminds me of a plastic model that me and my brother played with as kids and we used to put our little die-cast cowboys and indians on it to have a 'battle'.In fact I can almost smell the green enamel paint we used to use to make them look vaguely 'real' just like they have done in this shot.
I seriously think that they're testing the credibility/gullibility of viewers to see whether we've been dumbed-down enough to get away with a 'Mars-Shot'
They test how many idiots like you are there on the net
Omg it's almost 2014 lets get some colour images of the moon already!
Well... The moon is Grey colored... sooo
^Wrong^
:P
Some already made this joke.
***** good point how can you get color by filming something thats grey
So we come again next year to comment:
"Its 2013! Can we get some color photographs of the moon already?"
a couple thousand times? I'm in! ^^
Come back man
RUclips: “here some NEW images from the moon”
Uploaded 9 years ago…
At time index 2:53, just left-of-center, are two (2) monoliths (resembling shiny, dome-like structures, IMO) casting impressive shadows on the surface.... Looking top-to-bottom, the first "dome" is on the left-side, nearest the top and.... the second (and larger) dome is beneath it, at around 45 degrees to its right.... A clearly discernible path can be seen running about part-way between both monoliths. Surely, I can't be the only person to have noticed these monoliths.
I've read that since theres no wind on the moon, the footprints and rover prints from the moon landings should still be there! If so, it would be awesome to see some hd images of that!🌚👣
There are pictures of all the landing sites taken from the LRO. They are available on RUclips and other sources.
With that quality can we focus on the Apollo landing sites?
They won't because there is nothing there
already been done. Google "LRO Apollo landing sites" You can see the lower descent stages, footprints, and a lot more. Hoaxters don't bother to find factual evidence. It doesn't fit into their belief system.
Have you seen them? A single white pixel, nothing else.
quadcatfly A single white pixel? Oh really? I suggest you try these RUclips searches:
1) LRO revisits Apollo Landing sites
2)Ultra Close Up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site - GoneToPlaid
3) Apollo 11 Powered Descent and LRO Imagery
4) Apollo 15 Descent Film and LRO Imagery
The latter two are a split screen of the real-time 16mm DAC imagery AND the manipulated LRO imagery (side-by-side_ Notice the EXACT moonscape of both image sets? There is one major difference between the two. The real-time images show a pristine moonscape. The LRO imagery is littered with footprints and other artifacts ;-)
If that doesn't seal the deal for you....NOTHING WILL!
If this video is real it would have been on the nightly news. Obama would be discussing as well. The fact that you have been telling everybody in this thread that this one video should end the moon hoaxers claims once and for all and no one has ever heard of it except you, is really telling. If it were real it would be the most played thing on TV. I think I've seen it. It's CGI, trust me.
It's 2011. Can we get some color photographs of the moon already?
xtelevisionset found it
2019
2020 and NASA is more BS than ever and the world sucks due to a great awakening, now we're all going to lose the few rights we have under the guise of a virus that has killed less people than the regular flu. Can I please go back in time with you guys?
2021
Moon is a goddess and a spirit!
How could you go even closer to it ?
This is CGI....LOL
How beautiful is the Californian desert in black and white...
Thank-you for the great pictures! Can anyone tell me why we can't get clear pictures of mars? Anything reasonable that I might be able to believe?
Sure didn't take away my breath
Look closely on a normal sized screen with a hand held magnifying glass and you will be... start at about 2:35 onward..
Seems like the craters are almost all from impacts directly from above rather than angled to the side. I would have expected more angled impact craters. That is, the craters are all too circular rather than oval.
Most craters will be round, regardless of the angle of impact. The release of kinetic energy is on such an enormous scale that it's more like a bomb going off than a simple collision.
Here is a detailed video that explains why most craters on the moon are round: ruclips.net/video/BCGWGJOUjHY/видео.html
well, I still have my breath.
Always perfect; all the craters are empty and perfectly symmetrical, none have leftovers or other debris or leveled bottoms from those famous spacewinds.
Whatever the circular shaped objects are casting cone shaped shadows in the center of the frame and up are - are very very interesting. Even looking with a hand lens and hi resolution I cannot get close enough, but it would be really nice to have some idea of scale...
Imagens muito lindas parabéns NASA um passo.para.futuro.Deus.abençoe.
Yet still no pictures of NASA landing sights 😂🤣😂
There are pictures of landing locations. Do some research!!!!
Because there AIN'T none!
They don't exist... Well they do, or did, but they were on Earth!
@@theBigLubarski_1977 Haha! I'm changing my dog's name to The Big Lebarkski!
1:47
The bright big crater at the center is called Surveyor Crater as in a clock at 4 o'clock is Surveyor 3 at 11 o'clock is Intrepid the Apollo 12 lunar lander, the trails of the astronauts' footsteps can be seen too as thin as fine hairs on top and around the rim of the crater. But if people chose to close their eyes they couldn't see much, still the proof is there for those willing to look for it.
should put a human in those shots to give some sort of perspective!!!
There done. It took a year but if you rewatch you'll notice little dots on the Moon's surface. Those are the size of people for your perplexed perspective.
Are there any videos like this of tranquility base or any other lunar landing sites?
Can't wait till we go go back there.
Now that is what I always knew could be produced with cameras, even as far back as the 1960s'. So what will be their excuse for the next round of grainy pictures?
phillip harden Nowadays pictures are more clear.
Exactly. Moon Landings were fake. They can't show any evidence of what was allegedly left on the moon by Apollo, 500 000 pounds of equipment.
Exactly. Moon Landings were fake. They can't show any evidence of what was allegedly left on the moon by Apollo, 500 000 pounds of equipment.
I am so privileged to be able to sit here in front of my computer and see thousands /millions of years of asteroid impacts on the moon. Thank you.
Are you still using youtube?
@@Astranaut69 Yes, why ?
@@beb5816 because u joined 10 years ago
At 2:54 you can see two Towerlike buildings or domes on the left side of the picture. Compare the shadows from the craters with these structures. There are also smaller domes near to the big ones if you zoom in. The two buildings are connected with a kind of way.
Also at 2:53 there are several towers with tracks leading to them (top left ).
eudherz The sun angle is low, so those "buildings" are just big rocks or boulders casting long shadows.
eudherz ur right and we can see them from earth too😏
Note tower framework with possibly a dish above the crater at 1:32 to 1:34.
Very interesting, but frankly, I could probably be fooled by a big sheet of plaster dribbled with sand and with a few ball bearings dropped into it from above and a strong light source at a steep angle, and just add a good camera and some brooding music, and you got me.
at 2:50 you can see an object leaving a trail on left hand side and moves up some type of mining machine. its a dual print track perfect in every way. its not a rolling rock its a trail leaving a machine footprint track mark... just above where object stops you can see another base and construction with pipe like structure forming the crater at 12 o clock where it stops. look close you can see the architecture.
These mean nothing without a scale in miles. What looks like a one mile frame could be 100 miles.
orange70383 Exactly. As a matter of fact this was examined, by several people qualified to do the math, and they determined that the equipment supposedly left on the moon would have to much larger than they were to be seen at all from that distance. I would be like watching someone from earth waving at you and as you zoom in finding out that person is the size of the Statue of Liberty!
***** No one can leave earth and walk around on another world yet. Especially not 50 years ago.
And you're an expert on space travel? It happened. Tens of thousands of people worked to make it happen. We're not going now only because of politics. We could have bases on the moon, and might have gone to Mars by now if only we had the will to go. The technology is not that hard, it just takes money that Americans no longer want to spend.
John Agnew You're correct. Thousands tried to make space travel a reality but rather than admit failure they decided to fake it. And only a handful of them new the fix was in. The rest were fooled with you and everyone else at home watching. You don't have to be an expert on brain surgery to notice if a patient the doctor is operating on is a mannequin with spaghetti and macaroni as a brain. Or to notice he never washed his hands before surgery. These things alone can help you deduce that an event is fake without it being your field of study. Apollo is the same way. It just looks fake. No other expertise is needed to say that.
***** I'm a graphic designer and I own a small Trucking company. If you can use personal insults about me without a shred of proof, I sure can talk about what looks fake without proof. I don't need proof to state what looks staged to me. Even if it NASA decided to do the common sense thing like send a robot to the surface of the moon tomorrow and take HD pics of the Apollo Missions sites, that still doesn't change the fact that all the pics and videos prior to them look fake. They will always still appear fake. And they will never prove otherwise in my opinion.
It's 2015 already. can we get some colored photographs of the moon already?
copy more idiot
??
Copy?
you copy buzzfeed you dumb moron
Hit Music Buzzfeed?
Hit Music So mean :(
Can anyone explain why the 3 clearly visible crates at the top dead center of the frame at 2:38 completely disappear by the time they pan down to the bottom of the frame? There are many others that do the same. At 2:38 you will 3 craters in a closely spaced row at the top. Watch them and play. WTF?
+ArJuna22 No, no one but the graphics producers at NASA can tell you why they thought that would make sense, considering NO OTHER CRATERS suddenly illuminate that way. I just watched a 28 year old Arnold S fist fight a 68 year old Arnold S in the new Terminator movie so anything goes.
If you look around at 2:38 you will see, many more crater's vanish a long with those three crater's, why release this fake bullshit of the moon.
.... Relax.... it's a 3 + minute video.... which means they could not possibly show us everything on the lunar surface, in the time allotted.... Clearly, they tried to transition (or "fade") seamlessly from one photograph to the next.
They are still images, the maker of the video transitioned them
I realize the subject here is the surface of the moon, which does extend to the nearest horizon.
Would like to see if they have pics of the stars in the horizon shots - if any.
Are there links to other pictures from this orbiter showing STARS?
please post.
john buster. It’s day time. The same reason you can’t see stars here on earth during the day. The sky is black because there is no atmosphere
@@johnturner4400 what the heck are you talking about, itys daytime?? daytime where, in orbit?
there is a HUGE difference between pictures taken in a vacuum without the glare from any atmosphere to those taken under under earth's atmosphere. any glare from a bright surface would and could NOT affect the visualness of stars against the blackness of space in the same photo. The black areas off the horizons represent an unaffected line of sight through a vacuum and therefore there is no glare in those areas. You get it?
You're totally misunderstanding the physics.
I have found pictures of stars in the Surveyor V Program lunar picture archive showing stars that should have also been seen in the Apollo manned flights, but were NOT raising questions about whether or not we ever stepped foot on the moon.
Congrats! This looks as real as my 3D model app.
That sure is some grey looking cheese right there
Truly breathtaking, just think what it'll be like when we can actually get there
Ahhhh savage😂
Found the idiot.
reply to: Dangit don:
You're not talking about the moon rocks that NASA gave to Sweeden are you?
Cuz they had those analyzed, and they were found to be petrified wood samples.
All of you saying someone's an idiot because they are woke and aren't sleeping zombies that believe everything you're told are a bunch of bastard children with closed minds. I'm surprised you all don't believe in santa clause. More believable than some nerds saying they destroyed the technology to achieve the greatest thing mankind has ever accomplished, and that they could land on the moon with 60s tech and not even in 2020. You're all foolish as hell it's pathetic.
@doctoristina They have to fake it because a lot of structures,dense atmosphere and clouds......On many Lunar Orbiter Images you can find clouds and structures from buildings and so on.Thats a fact.NASA lied in everything about the moon.Many pictures are faked or manipulated but there is no doubt about that they did go to moon but all that faking has to do with the moon itself (much higher gravity than 1/6 and an atmosphere...) and the habitats and old ruins on it.Even in this new pictures from Tycho crater LRO for example you can find editing and manipulating to get things out of the picture.Maybe they made it often bad that we get a clou whats realy going on since the 60ties.Here some clouds picload.org/view/dcorcoid/clouds.png.html here some rocks ??? picload.org/view/dcorcoip/bandicam2018-11-0419-39-25-362.png.html
buzzfeed... anyone?
Mee
Dylan N. Yea
Would the earth look like the moon if it had no atmosphere? the oceans would freeze or evaporate, so it would leave the earth with the same composition as the moon and have the same shade of grey?
its 2011 Can we get some color photographs of the moon already?
dumbass these are color photos
that is in color....if its not in color when you look at it from the ground... its probably not gon' be in color in a photo....so... photograph... big word for a small brain... did your mommy teach you how to type it and where the p.h.o.t.o.g.r.a.p.h keys were?... or did she type that herself?
wow... i said that it was in color... last i checked.. that was the fuqin point...sure it reflects certain lights.. thats why the sun is apparently orange to us down here but its either white... yellow or blue (something i found somewhere on the net... either on fb or somewhere else but its not actually orange... supposedly) but i was just saying that if its not in color in your eyes.... its probably not in color on a color tv.... just sayin....and the first part of your comment.... " Funny How Someone As Stupid As You Thinks They Can *Talk to Others As if They Are."* this bit i did not understand.... "talk to others as if they are" whats that supposed to mean?... like i literally have beyond no clue what this means to take offence.... im like that dork on lord of the rings that said "what he be sayin? he saying somethin?" and then gandalf says "he invited us over for dinner"... and then the dwarf says...."oh... then lead the way!"
thank you for understanding....now can you plz rephrase or elaborate as to the sentence that i did not understand?...."talk to others as if they are".... you mean stupid? a stupid person talking to others as if they are stupid? could have phrased that a bit better but ok... i may be dumb.... but i am smart in areas in which you are stupid... though what those areas are.... i know not... so i cannot pwn your ass any better than i already am... you maybe be smart in math... i may be smart in spelling...you pwn me by telling me your phone number thru an equation and the answer is your number.... and i may look at everything you say and say you either spend too MUCH time keeping yourself looking good on your resume......or too little....either way... idk.... but i can tell ya you are probably not the greatest of ppl to be around in life if this is how u act all day.... me on the other hand.... i got nothing to do... so i try to be a cool guy... how thats working for me.... youd have to visit my house and talk to me to find out... cause i live in the middle of nowhere.... so i dont get visitors much... so i dont get to make much an impression on ppl...so.. yeah.... i suck... more than likely....
25 RUclips Comments That Are Actually Funny
But the real question is:
Does it have oil?
yes.. the moon carries alot of oil in the grounds. i get some transferred over to my state. But keep this on the low low.
Who is watching after chandran 2
?
were is colour photo
The moon is mainly gray, so it's difficult to see colours even if the photos are colour. You can see that if you look at the moon with a telescope. Also if you look at colour Apollo photos, like this: www.collectspace.com/review/apollo11_flag01.jpg
BS..one more trick from nasa..never-get-straight- answer. It should be in colour.
Art Carvajal LRO does have a colour camera, but it's lower resolution than the B&W camera. www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_color_2stretch_mask_0.jpg If you look at photos from the Japanese lunar probe, you will see that the moon is just gray anyway. www.space.com/images/i/000/003/336/original/080414-kaguya-earthrise-02.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=inside%7C660:*
Im 66 and retired ! I just watched a different video of the Moon , they were able to FIND ! and then SHOW ! the rover and lander on the MOON !! Do people really believe that MAN went from FIRE to that, just by lucky mutations ? or that man's brian developed to that point by chance ? I think MANs mind is incredible ! and had to come from something even more incredible that created it !
Lots of people made the comment shown on the buzzfeed video...where's the real one?
Dug really deep, probably harder than finding King Tut's tomb.
that looks like the cellulite of my ex gf
I thought dis was 2014 can we get some color footage god damn
u saw the buzzfeed vid
NAWHHH THE MOON IS RAINBOW A-STUUPID
Karen Barsoum hilarious. You’re funny. Wait...you’re serious? Oh Karen... you may need help...
That was in color.
I can make same shots with 3d studio max
Can you do it for free ? I'd like to use them.
I can make shots of lowers with 3d studio max
Beautiful amazing
nice picture of earth...
I never knew people were such trolls about space. It's kind of interesting in itself. Enjoy and don't feed the trolls.
If people don't get exactly what they want they moan online.
Anti-intellectualism easily latches onto anti-Americanism and/or religious fundamentalism. It's sad to see people so bored with human achievements they'd rather pretend they didn't happen. It's a sign of a decadent and declining civilization.
@aromardu It could also be the sign of major scientific breakthrough, where in history you can reference 'bored civilisations decline'! that's an interesting one I must say :)
Nomad Chad You do realize that just because someone may disagree with you or have an unpopular opinion doesn't make them a troll?
Nomad Chad Just ignore them. All idiots, every damn one.
Moon has no water then how small stone isolated from bigger in such a symmetric way.
.
Oh, look. It's a rock. How fascinating.
Good call there. The general color of the moon is a very light, medium green color. It's shown in many photos out there you can find on the net.~
Absolutely stunning I love it
why am i seeing cgi?
You're not.
Because some of the images that they are showing are assembled from numerous photographs combined with radar data to generate large 3-D maps of the lunar environment. That's why it's called the Lunar RECONNAISSANCE Orbiter. It's meant to generate highly detailed maps of the lunar environment for the planning of future missions.
Open your mind dave!
+FosterZygote Well I need to see high resolution pic on the Apollo site and the equipment left behind. We only get specs that could be anything when it comes to that.
www.nasa.gov/images/content/584398main_M168353795RE_25cm_AP12_area.jpg
They are high resolution and they are considerably more than specks. Remember these images were taken from about 31 miles away. That's like photographing a 1 inch object from over 1113 feet away. Luckily there is a valid scientific reason to one day return to the various landing sites from the '60s and '70s, both manned and unmanned. Engineers will be interested to see the effects that decades of exposure have had on the materials left on the moon, especially in the context of planning long term bases.
But allow me to make a prediction as to what will result when Apollo conspiracy theorists are one day shown close-up photos of Apollo artifacts in situ. Most of them will simply dismiss these as more fakes, and begin scrutinizing them for what they imagine are telling flaws despite their complete lack of expertise in the relevant subjects.
The Apollo landings never happened. Why would they not show images of that first so we could see the most important human achievement of all time. And this may not be real either.
Omni Crenshaw * Thank You * I Agree With You * I Also Have Many Facts That Are At Odds With The Moon Landing Lie * Why Play Golf On The Moon ? ? ? I It Was A Roust To Help Trick The World * To Me , The Golf Thing Shows The Astronauts Were To Carefree To Be That Far From Earth And The Seriousness Of The Mission * Did NASA Take All That $30 Billion Dollars To Show Us Golf On The F***en Moon *
+Kim Swisher I Can't Edit On This Format * I meant To Say At Odds With The Moon Landing *
Kim Swisher
Yes. A serious moon landing would have involved some mining expeditions and some stunning pictures of the stars and Constellations. And even if the camera exposure was an issue, they supposedly had several trips there to fix that. And why not bring a telescope. They were simply playing around. And you were also right about them not having enough fear being that far from home not knowing they could get back or not. And everything science -wise, in history that's ever been tried for the first time in history always involved animals doing it first. How is it that the most dangerous, most unknown, most expensive, and most highly televised experiment ever, was not tried on monkeys or lab rats first?
I dare you to take a picture of the stars right now and post it. Give it a try. I am waiting to see your attempts.
John Morrison You do realize stars have been photographed don't you? And the earth has an atmosphere. You have to just set the exposure. I'm sure NASA had filters for that. Smh...
CGI
Dave T if you dont believe go fuck yourself although it looks like cgi this are real photos from the moon and they 3d mapped the moon
Flat earth - Mark Sargent
dan dare...they're everywhere ---> infesting RUclips like a virus!
Xx_progamer550_xX// DarkGaming550
LOL even NASA shills like you admit it looks like CGI
Dumb, dumber, flatearther
Spectacular! Now where are those alien bases?!?!?👽👨🚀👽👨🚀👽👨🚀
are wonderful this show from moon...thanks !!
So, just w h e r e are the great lunar cities often referred to by moonologists?
I hope that someday we get to see the "un-scrubbed" images from LRO. The ones that show what is really there.
Only graphics? Any real photos?
>tranquility base
If the shots were taken from 50km above the surface, even with 1080p HDTV cameras, I don' think we can find the base structure of the moon landing vehicle. (It's like trying to find a car from a jet plane.)
Man I could see several "tracks" that were of inconsistent directions and seemed to terminate at an objects which were tall and had elongated shadows. Amazing!!!
We can't at this point in time because the last pictures we had of the moon were from the Apollo missions, we've had about 30 years of the Space Shuttle program, and now our eyes are turning to the Red planet (Mars). So there won't be any colour pictures of the moon at this stage, unless plans go ahead to try bringing over some life to the moon in an attempt to sustain it.
would love to see some photos of apollo missions equipments left there on the moon
Happy Hours 1:47 if you look very closely you. Could see the foot
Rints
At 1.47 you can see one of the Apollo landers with surface disturbance (track marks) near it.
The funny part was at 1:32 where the straight black line that was suppose to be the horizon suddenly became the flat moon edge where moon men fall off from. At least we've got an ice wall. Next time we're up there we should put up some protective yellow tape.
So what was so breathtaking was shown? Any unusual formations? New elements? Anything new on the moon we don't have on Earth? What bang do we get for our buck? The music was great. Thanks.
What did you make these on?
There's a reason why Apollo 14 was the LAST mission "to Moon" and it was almost 50 years ago.
There I was, watching a movie in my Moon Yurt, and KERSPLAT Space threw a rock at me and splattered me it all ove the noon.
at 1:47 you can see a base and objects creating a path in the crater. two shiny metallic objects on edge of crater with paths. nice base with another object in crater to left
That's the Apollo 12 landing site. You can see the lunar module and the Surveyor 3 probe. You can also see the astronaut's footprints where they walked around the rim of the crater to visit the probe and remove some of its parts that were brought back to the earth.
invert colours on phone and watch thru camera mode at screen .enjoy
What happened to all those 'blurred out' anamalies from the Apollo missions? Did they all misteriously disapear when the LROs went flying over? How does something on the moon disapear from one photo to the next?
I wonder if we could ever land on Pluto?
Sometimes it's weird and surprising with whatever we have such as sun,moon,stars it's so nice god's creation is so beautiful
@IcoVir As an ex-stoner, I can tell you that simple things can be appreciated and understood at a highly profound level. Things we take for granted can be focused on and completely understood under the "tutelage" of the green guy. The surface of the moon, the vastness of space, or simply the difference between the sexes can all be profound experiences while stoned.
Why do these images have a higher resolution and finer detail than the LRO images of the Apollo landing sites ?
timefilm .... Are you suggesting that the moon is geologically active? The moon has been geologically inactive on the order of billions of years. also, an amazing impact of a comet hitting Jupiter was recorded with amazing clarity.... The comet was seen broken into pieces before it struck the surface . I am not quite sure what you mean by no impacts have ever been seen.
anyone see the foot prints at 2:08? I hope those are foot prints, if they are that is so awesome that they got them in the photos
I'm interested in a nice quiet retirement home with a view of Earth.
Who is the real estate agent?
How much can I expect to pay for property?
Are there any restrictions?
Can I build a wall around my property? I hate trespassers.
Thank you.
They should record over the first American moon landing sight for debris and once and for all find out if we really landed or not .
die hard
Though our technology is vastly superior to what it was in the 50 years since we supposedly went to the moon, somehow it isn't possible to get a camera near these sites
They did. Google "LRO images of the Apollo landing sites". Also at about 1:45 of this video you can see the Apollo 12 landing site. You can see the lunar module and the Surveyor 3 probe. You can also see the astronaut's footprints where they walked around the rim of the crater to visit the probe and remove some of its parts that were brought back to the earth.
има ли кратера који су настали а да метеорит није одарио под 90°?Сви ударци под правим углом?
Логично би било да је већину кратера формирао ударац под косим углом!
Дакле,кратери нису настали ударцем метеорита.
congrats dude, your comment is the most famous youtube comment ever... its everywhere on facebook... a lot of people shared it...
Another batch of amazing photos of the Moon, in black and white...and the stars still cannot be filmed or seen beyond the surface of the Earth...or did I miss those photos, guess they COULD BE in color. The Clementine photos, the declassified film, the first batch, are in color and look like nothing seen before ....literally.
What a coincidence, i came here too because he was here!
Wow... I wish the titles included some size/ scale info. I wonder about the dimentions
of the Linne Crater..
Come back man
Porque no indican la ubicación del sitio y la escala en la superficie ? Estos datos nos darían mayor claridad a las imágenes e ilustrarian a nosotros los neofitos en el tema . Gracias.
Great video. Thank you so much for providing us the name of the song!
It's 2020. Can we please get some color shots of the moon!?
I would love to see more of that specially when it’s like 10%
came here for the picture, stayed for the music.
The LRO's mission is to map the moon -- not to prove that the moon landings were in fact real. The LRO was designed to fly fairly low over the moon at an altitude of only 50 km. The LRO narrow angle cameras use rather small CCD sensors which consist of a single row of 5064 pixels of 7 micron pixel size, for a sensor width of 35.4 mm. The LRO's 7 micron pixel size is considerably larger than the size of the Airy disk produced by the LRO's 8 inch aperture 700 mm focal length optical system.
Very beautiful selection of music. Why go Mars when the Moon is so beautiful and so close!!!!! Such a waste of opportunity!!!
The mountains in the beginning of this video make the Apollo "mountains" look even more ridiculous!
why it's black-white?
If this video does not show the fact that we never went to the moon I don't know what would
Great shots of the moon, looks like a derelict building site, any chance of getting a few shots of where Neil Armstrong and buzz lightyear had a bit of a walk about and planted an American flag, just to make sure