They are the biggest hucksters, conning people for book sales, overpriced speaking fees and RUclips clicks. Everyone of his claims have been thoroughly debunked. He purposely fails to mention stronger contrary evidence and cherry picks weaker science, misrepresents it, and flat out lies about it. He is the opposite of reason, logic, and honesty. Then he cries the "mainstream academia" is attacking him. It's a old con man trick that "mainstream academia" doesn't fall for, and neither should you.
Hancock's critics and detractors most often mischaracterize his position. As he states in the video, he is NOT an "ancient astronaut" advocate. He is NOT saying the lost civilization was more advanced than we are today. He is NOT saying the bulk of modern archeological results are wrong. He IS saying there is enough unknown, enough unexplored, enough evidence to warrant a CONVERSATION about the possibility. Why is mainstream so unwilling to have a conversation?
And even now there are parts of the world with subsistence farmers and on other parts of the planet they are making rockets going in to space. Why could it not be possible that there could have been advanced cultures sitting beside subsistence farmers like today? He is often claimed to be a Pseudo scientist, and he has never claimed to be a scientist. Always think they have already lost the argument if they just stick to name calling, rather than actually discuss some of Graham's evidence.
I was in the great pyramid 45 years ago. You can’t imagine. You really can’t. Not one mark, embellishment or even decorative archway anywhere. Cold, austere, just …..there. And now we know there are thousands more all over the earth. Even bigger. Gives a completely new meaning to “the Stone Age”.
@@justinstuart8382 …bummer for you. I can’t imagine what they could restore on mammoth rocks. There was some manmade lighting and a very steep wooden ladder/staircase thing that went up to the “king’s chamber”, which was a medium size room with a broken granite box in it. No decorations or architectural design anywhere. The other tombs we visited were carved with images from floor to ceiling. I always thought the caravans coming through the desert found the pyramids and camped there for a while waiting for the builders to come back, because obviously they were in charge of the world. Eventually it turned into Cairo, an unplanned city with haphazard streets. Again, my imagination.
@@JP-je6jg we could start with there was no evidence of civilisation prior to Sumer? Moving onto the Incas built the Andes Citadels? When they said they did not? Nipping across to carbon dating .... it cannot date stone and the material they cite could have been situated there after construction. I will finish off with the water erosion of the sphinx? As a history graduate i was taught history relies on it's sources and interpretation. The sources are requiring further interpretation. That is all Hancock has really ever argued for.
@@yvonnesmith2115 well presumably as a historian, you must understand that you need to look at multiple sources. So it strikes me as odd that you used Robert Schochs theory on water erosion on the sphinx...when multiple other geologists who have worked on the sphinx have discredited his ideas (Colin reader and Rob Schneiker to name 2). Arguments that as far as I'm aware, he has never answered (there is a very good video on the World of Antiquity RUclips channel on the subject). Have you looked at the alternative theories put forward by other geologists? Well if we hadn't found sites, if the only evidence available pointed to more primitive cultures, why would the theories make stuff up? For someone who claims to have 2 degrees, you seem oddly dismissive of the scientific process 🤔. I'd also say there is a world of difference between finding a site like Gobekli tepi, a site verifiably dated to 10,000 years ago, and making literally baseless assertions about the age of the pyramids. He has no evidence, all he does is speculate. Carbon dating is just 1 method for dating historic sites and items. Again, surely your big fancy history degree should tell you that? I'm afraid you have me at a disadvantage on the Inca, so il just have to take you at your word on that one...🤣
@@notreally2406 hahahaha I mean iv watched his videos so I know he does make baseless assertions, 'This mark here is a clear sign of an ancient cataclysm.' 'This structure is older than mainstream archaeologists would have us believe'...based off what evidence Graham? He never says.
A man who has walked through the fire and never gave up. Things he suggested over 20 years ago that were laughed at and ridiculed have turned out to be plausable. A massive megalithic site dating back to a time period that previously was not possible and evidence building for a cataclysm in time period he suggested back then. Don't be fooled by the haters and don't take his ideas as fact. He doesn't say this idea is fact, yet academics get so angry and worry the 'stupid people' are being duped by his ideas. Academics duped everyone with the Clovis first model which has now been proven wrong. We really don't know everything as there is still so much to discover so keep your mind open.
I bet getting loads of money from selling sensationalist books helps 🤣. Hmm...you don't seem to understand how academia works. Academics didn't dupe anyone with the clovis first model...it was based off the information available at the time. As new discoveries were made that suggested it wasn't true...opinions started to change. There is a National geographic article from 2007 that is easily googled, that highlights how the understanding has changed. No archaeologists or historian ever says we know it all. That's why they keep digging...to find new stuff. It was an archaeologist who discovered gobekli tepe and continues to work on it...not Hancock. Why has he never made such a discovery?
@@JP-je6jg i agree that is how historians should work. However it is not the point that the academics were correct at the time that they made that assertion it is the fact that they bully and silence debate. That is the problem. If you are comfortable with a world that you are told what the facts are and no one can question them you must have enjoyed the last 2 years.
No he isn't. When he says mainstream archaeology, what he means is people who actually study and work to understand he societies and cultures they are working on. Graham Hancock is a journalist. Would you trust a journalist to represent you in court? Or build you a house? Or operate on you? He is very welcome to train as an archaeologist and use his new skills to go and make discoveries based off his ideas. In fact I wonder why he hasn't ever made any discoveries? He questions the existence of atlantis...well if its so old...why was Plato the first person to mention it? Where are these egyptian records? Where is the story in Solon's recorded work? It's possible it was influenced by the eruption of Thera, but that was 1500 BCE...not 9000 bce. He also says archaeologists just speculate...which is hilarious because that is all he ever does.
@@stu2333 there must be a second season… he didn’t speak about the megalithic architecture for example (giant stone blocks), there were no pyramids, and not much talk about Atlantis … 😊 And the series is a massive success on Netflix.
I've watched all his podcast episodes on Joe Rogan and read all of his books from Fingerprints of Gods to America Before. They're fantastic. All of them. I'm so glad his Netflix series is doing so well. He deserves the recognition for the amazing work he has done. Randall Carlson is the man too.
But you obviously haven't looked at the people who have debunked him, just his warped perspective. Hancock is on for the paycheck scamming people who he knows won't research
Have you ever read a book or article by an actual archaeologist? Please do...your comment is just horribly ignorant. Please tell me at any point in any of his work, where Hancock evidences his points with actually verifiable proof? He mentions atlantis...well why was plato the first person to mention it? Please look it up, no egyptian mentions of it, nothing from Solon, his alleged source. Isn't that strange 🤔. All he does is speculate. He offers literally nothing positive to the study of history.
@@stevencoardvenice .....🤣 bless you. Did you actually read my points? I'm arguing against Hancock. I am passionately against his pseudoarcheological bullcrap. He does nothing but speculate and undermine genuine academic work that helps us understand the world.
What graham is saying in the second segment is “the truth is somewhere between written history, and archeological observation, but most likely based in reality”
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
That man is a living legend and I fear it will only be fully realised when he's gone. He's done truly pioneering and game changing work that sadly many write off as pseudoscience, partly because a lot of his research contradicts the old academic's archaic and obsolete findings, they really don't like it and react bitterly as a result, many trying to ruin his reputation. Thankfully as time has passed more and more of Graham''s theories have been proven correct. Anyone who hasn't dedicated a few hours to listen to this man speak on on a podcast is really missing out, but be warned, it will inevitably induce a totally involuntary but extremely enjoyable rabbit hole exploration that could last days!
@@justinstuart8382 I'm envious mate, although I would probably wind him up beyond belief with too many questions! You can tell he's a gent with impeccable manners, sadly they don't make many men like that anymore..
@@justinstuart8382 that's great! I was planning on doing the same but some heath issues have made that impossible in recent times but I'm confident I will make it to see him soon. If only to thank him for the help and hours of entertainment he's given me during some tough times in my life regarding health, nothing brightens the day like a Graham Hancock podcast after all. I think my copy of that book is getting up there in age too. Cheers!
@@rjim1 I actually let him be when I first saw him because I knew I would do the same. First I just said hello and then let him settle. Later that evening we all had dinner with Andrew Colins , Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira.
@@justinstuart8382 I bet that was a fantastic experience! You're not wrong about 2015 being a different era too, you really never know what tomorrow holds and this is why I'm truly thankful and cherish each day I'm awarded on this beautiful planet of ours.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
@@sparky7915 _"Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances"_ Pseudoscientific nonsense. One might as well believe in leprechauns and Easter bunnies as all the codswallop you mention.
You are the true inspiration for younger generations. Thank you for being true to yourself and Sharing your wisdom to us Graham. Doesn’t matter who believes you or not but what matters is that you keep going with your work, which is incredibly a true fact . I truly believe there was the lost civilisation with all the evidences now came out as a documentary in Netflix. Full support for you Graham. Keep fighting ❤
Very glad for this blog and to publicly show huge support for Graham Hancock, and Netflix series, and all the guys and gals who are making history researching lost Ancient History.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Around the same 11500 yrs ago an ancient port city in South India called "Poombuhar" or "Kaveropoompatinam" was destroyed due to rising sea levels. This city is found to be around 250 Square kilometres wide and was doing sea trade with Greeks, Romans, Arabs and Chinese. Graham Hancock has also researched about this city and estimated the age of this port city as 15000 yrs old. Possibly the world's first civilisation with advanced developments in todays Tamilnadu in South India. There are lot of Sangam period literatures which talk about the length and breath of this city and its structure in greater details.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Graham, you and your wonderful colleagues are a true glimmer of hope in our rigid restrictive world. Call it intuition but I resonate deeply with the idea that our human species is much more complex and ancient than current scholars allow in their text books. You only have to look at the way modern humans follow rigid rules of religion, Christianity, Islam and Judaism being the main reason that this information is suppressed and proves how control and dogma shape our current human story. The control evidently spills over by banning Graham from sites and blatantly disregarding evidence that is smacking the archeologists and historians in the face by never digging deeper. If anything their arrogance makes Grahams thoughts and ideas even more interesting and credible. It’s a war on dogma but I have a very strong feeling vindication is coming!
Wait a minute, why are you blaming Religion/God for people that do not believe in God or religion, blaming/persecuting Hancock. That makes no sense to me.
@@kickerpunter8414 I think you know exactly what I’m saying and just trying to stir the pot. Religion is dogma, dogma is control, control is sensorship, rigidity and rules that are integral forces upon us from being children, forced to partake in church services and read the dogmatic text books in schools never opening free thought or investigation. I’m sure you catch my drift. If most of the people living in Egypt didn’t follow Islam right now someone may actually allow deeper excavation. If America wasn’t so engrained in Christian BS it may allow the notion that Serpent Mound is far older and a deeper look. We know that the truth of a much older advanced civilisation will impact religion today as it doesn’t work with their timelines.
@@acacianilotica4497 I see it differently. I think they attack Graham because he espouses a view about a great flood & that's just too close for comfort to these evolutionary "bible" thumpers. They hate God & anything that even comes close to backing up the Bible or anything of possibility about his existing, as "DANGEROUS." Look around you. Notice things, notice patterns. Don't just believe what you hear b/c it sounds good. No Christians are espousing things that hurt people. If they've clung on to morality, your'e now seeing why it was so important... If you just look around you & use your brain/intellect. Respectfully
@@kickerpunter8414 Christian’s clinging on to Morality ? I politely disagree but thank you for your thoughts, I agree they attack Graham because he dares to open up Pandora’s box. I never ever believe what I hear because it sounds good. If that were case my life would have gone on a very different path. I hope you are looking around and also using your brain to the best that is can be! Respectfully
Which is the problem for a lot of his detractors who just point to their own flawed (incompletely) evidence to disprove him. 3:05 You’ll notice that Graham always shows respect to the existing theories and suggests that they may need to be re-examined… hardly an attack. we’ve discovered multiple ancient megalithic sites like Göbekli Tepe and The scientific community chooses to ignore the blatant evidence.
keep up the research, more discovered every day. history of mankind will naturally change as these discoveries are presented. having an open mind surely will allow us to learn what has happened in times gone past.
I watched Ancient Apocalypse and found it very interesting. I did not know that there were large sophisticated structures dating so far back. I thought that Hancock presented some convincing arguments, but I would like to hear the other side of the argument as well. Does anyone know of a good rebuttal source?
No there is no good rebuttal, mainstream archaeologists write off the notion that these structures could be much older than we originally thought. They are hiding something and I’m sure one day we will find out the truth about our roles here on earth and how we became what we are now.
thats the thing, they have no decent argument against hancock...... all they ever say is he's a drug taking lunatic..... not exactly a great argument when he clearly puts the work in and help teach us all a more credible theory than mainstream crap
pretty much any decent book on the topics of history, geology, anthropology and biology are enough to crush this charlatan, but the more the better. He might sound convincing but he is just a good liar - cherrypicking facts, relying on grey areas where there is not a lot of archeological evidence and using mythology and stories as actual literal facts.
I’m so curious what he thinks of Tesla’s views of the pyramids in Egypt and how they were utilized for a wired, gold and copper based system of electricity, fueled by the natural spring / waterways under the pyramids. It’s not magic. It’s actually a very reasonable theory.
I first met Graham at the Glastonbury Crop Circle Symposium circa 1999 where he was presenting his latest book. And again in Montréal April 2019 presenting his "America Before" book. On both occasions he took time to talk to you and answer questions, he is very approachable person, what you see is what you get. Nice guy.😅😊
I love this guy! Graham, you are a humble prophet of the modern age. Thank you for the work that you have done. Without your sacrifices we - humanity with amnesia - would be in a darker dark.
Prophet of modern age xD xD xD He is always making wierd claims about "most archaeologists", and he doesn't even have anything close to a degree in anything that matters, least of all a PhD (yeah, he doesn't have one). Remember that this guy has EVERYTHING to win with all of these claims he is making. Economically, his books saw a huge spike after his Netflix documentary. This should make us cautious about believing his message.
The arrogance of academics knows no bounds, if it doesn't fit their model it's wrong. Graham Hancock is very knowledgeable, and I believe him over the woke brigade any day.
@@baabaabaa2293 Hawass is protecting Egypt’s version of history as the first advanced technical civilisation to the point that he has refused permission to explore the known void below the sphinx. Quite possibly because it is claimed that it holds the proof that Atlantean’s settled in both Egypt and Golbekli Tepi following the submergence of their home.
@@aardvarkrevolution5764 l blv ur right on both counts. Hawass shd allow excavation beneath the Sphinx, as well as a proper search of the doors they found in the pyramids in the 90s...then went quiet on... I saw they've found another settlement in Turkey...shd be interesting.
@@baabaabaa2293 Yes, the monolithic site in Turkey will be Golbekli Tepi. Academia will have it that 11,600 years ago only hunter gatherer’s lived in the area. Now they discover a site with extraordinary monolithic structures which before being abandoned were deliberately buried. My original comments really refer to academics not being willing to accept any evidence that doesn’t endorse their established narrative. As with more recent events - the science is never settled.
@@aardvarkrevolution5764 no worries mate.. And yeah why bury the site like they did? Some of the carving lve seen is similar to Sumerian & other sites around the world.... we've definitely missed & been misled on a lot of history. With Egypt, l blv ur right, protection of the tourist dollar & grants they get for excavation at other digs.
If the people in power never hid information from us for thousands of years and we grew up knowing the truth from the onset... mankind would not be so blind and would be more open minded... we are now living in an era where the truth needs to come out and mankind needs to take off its blinders. We have been monopolized by the ones in power for too long and need to understand our true purpose and heritage in this world. The book of Enoch was my very first eye opener... I'm now looking forward to watching this series in the Hope's to more answers to my many many questions about life
I grew up on farms in Africa. No Phone, no TV, Just the stars. The ape has looked at the stars for a very long time and good observation is good science.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Mr. Hancock has been doing what anyone involved in the sciences ought to always be doing, which is asking themselves the difficult questions about the things which don’t fit the paradigm. He is worth ten of every archaeologist who ever lived.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Actually, the person who really broke this story was Immanuel Velikovsky and the Thunderbolts Project has refined much of what he said. There seems a fixation on the event corresponding to the Younger/Dryas, but the Thunderbolts Project has proved rather conclusively that these events were occasioned by the change from a much different solar system in which Saturn was captured by the current main sequence star. Because these conjectures are associated with a very different cosmology even much of what Hancock believes is probably too uniformitarian to be correct. It would also help if he made some attempt to sync up with Velikovsky, David Talbott, and Dwardu Cardona, instead of insisting that he is a uniquely insightful scholar. After all, it was Velikovsky who wrote *Mankind in Amnesia* not Hancock.
The pyramid design was inspired or provoked by the sacred mountain which was a giant pillar in the sky created by plasma streaming between the Earth and Mars during the polar configuration. It was inspired by an archetype which, in its origin, was provoked by an actual cosmic event lasting thousands of years and seen by almost everyone on the planet, at least north of what was then the equator (which is not the equator of today). ruclips.net/video/UkPpR8t1qvk/видео.html
Quetzalcoatl was simply a giant plasma emission in what is called "arc mode," something that Anthony Peratt identified as associated with the "Thunderbolt of the Gods". Cardona identifies it much more specifically with the cometary Venus. The beard which is sometimes identified as whiskers is, like the feathers, commonly associated with dragons. And they are, again, a manifestation of plasma in arc mode. Hancock's interpretation of this phenomenon as a person is too conventional, and is probably the result of later modifications to a much earlier mythology that more properly identifies the provocating cosmology.
Interesting contribution to this list of comments. I will have a look into Immanuel Velikovsky and the Thunderbolts Project. There are many ways to interpret and speculate on what has gone before. I also diverge in my speculation and am always interested in other people's ideas. Thanks for your input.
@@Demosophist yeah I liked your points, hats off. I still believe hancocks story is fascinating because that was the first time I was confronted with such an idea. I've always thought that the history of mankind was weird with how it was taught in school and that everyone believed in.
The megalithic evidence is undeniable. Our current view of history needs to be updated with other options - considering new ideas is at the heart of all scientific research fields. The history taught in schools for a century is written by Victorian explorers driven by religious bias and lacking modern dating/radar technology. The idea that some of these century old ideas might need updating is a no-brainer. Mr Hancock has a great way of opening up the history and talking about alternatives. It's called critical thinking. Bravo Graham, Bravo!
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
It's a joy to listen to Graham Hancock and Randall carlson, especially when they are invited to the Joe Rogan Experience. The series on Netflix is very well made, but focuses a little bit too much on the "main stream science archeology" and the more "open interpretation by Hancock" divide in my opinion, but it is still great that people can make up their own minds about our past. The series gives credit to our mysterious past and discoveries like Göbekli Tepe have shaken our foundations tremendously in recent years, that makes history very exciting.
@@edelgyn2699 the discovery of GT has put the timeline back a few thousand years. Mesopotamia (Sumer) was considered to be the most ancient civilization until GT was discovered. Its discovery has led to new questions on the nature of hunter gatherers developing to be sedentary farmers. I would say that has created quite a stir. It's exciting that so much of our past is still waiting to be unearthed. It appears that GT might have been covered with dirt and rocks on purpose, I find that intriguing, why would one put so much effort in building these sites only to hide them from view many years later?
We need more free thinkers like this. The old crowd of archaeologists with the 'We have all the answers so stop asking stupid questions ' arrogance need to be ignored.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
the ego of humanity is unfortunately concerned with WHO is right rather than WHATS right , at this stage all viewpoints are valid and should be explored , after all isn't that the basis for science . whats right not whose right should point the way , hanccok and may others have great points
I really enjoy Graham Hancock ideas and hypothesizes, it's ok to think outside the box. People who work in any field as a specialist are only as good as the knowledge they are taught, it doesn't mean they are always right. I think he is not saying believe in his idea's, he is telling you to have a look for yourself and make an informed decision for yourself. Stop being a surface reader and have a more opened mind.
I saw the serie on Netflix Apocalypse. I knew about Gizeh, but your story of all places on the world signs to 12800. Beautiful. I also read that when Planet X (Niburu) comes along that planet have a lots of meteors and debris. So they also say that now is the time that planet X is nearby the planet :) Also sleeping prophet Edgar Gayce say that the planet get a earth shift. Each year the planet shift 55 km a year. So their happens a lot :) Tnx for your information Gramham. Greetings Rob
I agree with Graham's theory, the timeline doesn't make sense that we sprung up in a short time, built pyramids and Stonehenge, then just forgot how to do it. Science is about questioning and constantly learning more to better understand our universe. If you get hung up in dogma instead of always questioning, you've lost the point in the exploration and discovery. Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.
Valuable real estate indeed, especially where a river flows into the sea. A major archaeological effort is needed in such locations. Difficult as they are now covered with about 120m of water - too deep for conventional diving which realistically is only useful for the top 20 or 30meters and at a pinch with special diving mixes and underwater habitats, to, say, 90m.
love this guy....he says as it is ....not always right ...but the who is to say he is wrong ....so much we dont know .... mainstream ideas been proven wrong so many times ... he thinks outside the box .... so many things in history do not add up .. keep going mr hancock ... top guy
Twas extremely interesting to hear about the dimensions of the pyramid. I'll apologise now Graham, as I've still not started the show on Netflix yet. I will do tomorrow matey.
I don't necessarily agree with him or Randal Carlson on most of their speculations HOWEVER, I cannot agree with the generally accepted ideas of how many ancient sites were built, they just do not add up. So I think it is very important to listen to people like this because science is always about questioning.
a lesson in not judging a video by the title. i was all ready for calling another Hancock a nutjob, but i totally agree, As much as i like archaeology it can't give us all the answers, it just fills bits of the jigsaw.
They're all just mad because Graham Hancock is the first person this century to make Archaeology exciting. And they're even angrier because he's coming with evidential arguments, not the psuedoscience they accuse him of.
Truth. I avoided listening to Hancock for years because of all the smears against him by the skeptic community. Today I finally sat down to listen to him debate Michael Shermer on Rogan. Hancock wiped the floor with him for over three hours. Shermer had nothing--he just kept demanding evidence, which Hancock delivered, and Shermer would just move the goalpost every time because he couldn't dispute his points. It's becoming increasingly clear that these people who constantly cast stones are themselves living in glass houses.
Mr. Hancock is a Titan...and History will remember him as such. At first ridiculed...however now, he's already been substantiated in his lifetime with Gobekli Tepe. We have been intentionally lied to, folks!
You are on the right track, and "Academia" will continue to obstruct you and others at every turn as you have already discovered. The bigger question that needs to be asked is why? For that you have to go back to the drawing board, and start with a completely new canvas. Without throwing the baby out of the bath, one has to re-piece the jigsaw puzzle but this time put aside all prejudice and preconceptions and then hopefully what will emerge is a picture that none of us could have ever imagined. You remind me of "Scully out of the X-Files" which isn't too far from the truth in all fairness. Academia, is fearful that if humanity truly discovers its real origins it would literally freak everyone out. The "Smithsonian Institute" has collected, and stored all the evidence that would be proof enough to validate that it is all true. However in their opinion mankind is not ready for this news to go mainstream. The fallout is unimaginable, in short. Anarchy, would throw our world into utter chaos. The order, or status quo would be no more. Ironically the so called powers at be have been gradually leaking this to us, in what they believe to be a safe-guarding way to ease us to accepting disclosure. The problem that they had is underestimating humankind to actually be far more accepting than making out that we were all ignorant. When I discovered sometime back that the so called "Great Pyramid of Giza" wasn't actually so great in the end. It became very clear that there was "Academia" who now had something to hide, which they have been protecting us from. The downside is no one appointed them to do that in the first place, as I don't recall being asked, do you? Satire, is so useful. There has been much speculation, and whilst the "Great Flood" does make itself present in many a religion and folklore, I have an alternative explanation which will blow you away.
Agree almost entirely with your observations. Here in South Africa the evidence is overwhelmingly that an unknown civilization did indeed exist. There are numerous geoglyphs of enormous dimensions, faithfully recorded by Google Earth now that they produce higher resolution images. I have screen saved hundreds of images of these and of other intriguing outlines of villages, especially along the African east coast, and towns with serpentine walling. In good faith, I emailed a well known local archeologist, photos of inscriptions on a large rock located in the khami complex. I even highlighted enough of the inscriptions to indicate how symbols were repeated. His reply, to say the least, was indignant with all these !!!!!???? Yes, political archaeology exists. And no, I'm not giving away co-ordinates. Not until someone shows enough interest to take the matter up. Besides, anyone can find the same evidence.
I'm sorry no, that is utter bullshit. Let's look at the world right now. Russian invasion of Ukraine is killing thousands of innocent people and causing havoc around the world. The cost of living crisis is making basics a struggle to afford, fuel, heating your home, even feeding your family. People's ability to survive is really being affected. The very essence of democracy is being challenged by lies and misinformation. Social media is warping people's minds with specific algorithms deigned to keep us addicted to our phones and various apps. Here in the UK, crazy government policies caused interest rates to rocket, meaning people can't afford their mortgages...even affluent families are now struggling. Now with all that going on...tell me why the hell people would give a crap about how old the sphinx is? How does knowing if the sphinx is 12000 or 4500 years old help a mother feed her child? Or a father make his mortgage payments? It just doesn't matter to pretty much any ordinary person. Look at all the most important people in the world, the Elon musks, the Jeff Bezos, Trump, Oprah, Jay Z, Lionel Messi, Xi xingping, Joe Biden....can you point to any of them as archaeologists or historians? They have no power, people by an large don't care. I work in a museum and I csn tell you, people remember about 8% of what they see. People don't care about dates. There is no big conspiracy to hide it from us...People just don't care. Grow up.
There are several reasons why history is being prevented and subsequently why it should be revealed.... first one that comes to mind is how true history would reveal how utterly ridiculously our past has been "revealed". For many years , institutions, academics, politicians have lauded over the "truth" and guiding policy and laws governing the peoples of the world. The major religions, the Trumps, the super wealthy have very much benefited from this confusion of facts and errors within errors. Academic archeologists who are so afraid of contradicting their colleagues have unwittingly bolstered the great lie. It goes without saying that wars, hunger and poverty start and stop with religion and the politics that accompany them. A great reveal about true history would utterly destroy the institutional lies and the accompanying greed and they know it. It could throw world order into chaos if it was discovered that great civilisations had existed in our past, that were for example, far more successful and peaceful. Does not everyone deserve a spot in the sunshine? Do we think for one minute that homo sapiens, who have existed and evolved for hundreds of thousands of years with the same brain capacity as modern man were all backward and somehow inferior to us? Capacity for deceit is demonstrated in nearly all forms of life on this planet and was probably a necessary component for existence but surely , nothing like the power and greed demonstrated by the trumps, Putins and Bezos who thrive on the great lie, were necessary? So yes, it matters that lies of this magnitude are revealed. It matters a great deal.
It’s interesting to hear Mr. Hancock say all of these things, because archaeologists really really don’t like him. I will share something up my own experience. I have met scientists, such as archaeologists, anthropologist, and, of course, historians in my lifetime. A lot of them are very intelligent, knowledgeable, and wise. Some of them are not. Some of them are presumptuous, defensive, arrogant, and somewhat insecure. I’m not really sure where that comes from but if you Dare to challenge certain viewpoints that those particular individuals or institutions, keep… You will encounter massive resistance, and they will become antagonistic and reject anything you say, after that point. They will not even entertain, listening to a logical statement, or rational argument about something they think they already know everything about. That being said, I have also met some wonderful archaeologists who truly are what they say they are… A student of the past. They know that there is much more left to learn, and they know that there is a lot more unknown than known. they understand that as the earth itself ages and changes… More archaeology and answers are revealed. Of course, along with that more questions arise. It’s interesting that there are many ancient texts and writings that talk about massive cataclysmic events, such as floods and fires and earthquakes. I have traveled to a number of countries around the world and seen evidence of these events. Some of the things cannot be explained by modern science. So I say… Why not think outside of the box and get creative with ideas about what may have happened? If what we are going through on the earth right now, is any indication of what could have happened or might have happened or actually did happen thousands of years ago… Who are we to say it cannot and did not?! to simply say that, you know everything about everything is the a pitta me of arrogance and borderlines on becoming evil. It is that type of elitist point of view that has landed all of humanity in the mess that we are in now. It’s time for change. I do not think we should simply except the opinions of academia as irrefutable fact anymore. I think we should except them as what we know so far, with room for more. I know that that’s going to piss them off, but I don’t really care. Only the ones who are guilty of being inflexible, need to worry about this. All the rest of the people out there who are doing fantastic work and research and crafting and excavating and hypothesizing, have my respect, and I would happily go along with them on a dig, or help them to analyze and clean up what they find. I’ve done it before. fortunately, archaeologists around the rest of the world are catching up with the times, and they are understanding now how little we know. It seems to be that only the ones in North America, and in isolated cases other countries just aren’t willing to budge on their previous positions. I will say one thing about Mr. Hancock, I don’t think the civilization was lost at all. I think part of it was totally destroyed. I don’t think that there are remnants or descendants. Still living on earth. No, I don’t think they were aliens. I think they were advanced human beings. People think that advanced civilization means advanced technology, but I think they are limiting themselves by that motive thinking. Advanced means more than just technology. It means an advanced higher way of thinking, learning, living, and applying knowledge and wisdom. We have advanced people living on earth now. They are the ones dreaming up things the rest of us wish we had thought of. We all have it within us to be like this. I agree with Mr. Hancock. I think the civilization was more or less wiped out with the exception of those who may have been chosen to survive, because they paid attention to the signs. Kind of like what’s happening in the world right now.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
You are absolutely right. There is nothing more annoying than inaccuracy caused by insufficient or skimpy research. I love it that you don't have a go at your critics, but quietly note their objections and answer them in a calm, civilised manner. That's the mark of real intelligence.
@@jeffmccloud905 Have you ever written a book? Or read one for that matter, because only an illiterate person could legitimately say what you just did. Research is all he’s done in over thirty years. Actual physical research, in person. He’s climbed the mountains, explored caves, tramped through actual jungles and investigated all these sites in person. He spent five years diving on sunken sites, he’s still diving now- in his seventies! He met the superb scientist that was in charge of the discovery of gobleki tepe, Klaus was the one who dug the thing up, he was the one who said it was deliberately buried and who dated it. He was a living legend when he was alive and still is now he’s passed, but he totally agreed with Graham. This man is a research machine.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
It is extremely difficult to 'lose' a civilization. Hancock's Atlantis would have produced a large of artefacts peculiar to itself - not those of other early civilisations. To date, none have come to light. The reason archaeologists do not believe in Atlantis is because there is no archeological evidence for it.
But is a reason for that because, as Graham points out, there is still so much of our planet that hasn't been touched by archaeologists? Additionally they have no plans to research these areas. How can we ever truly be sure about the story without every square inch of the planet being researched thoroughly? That is all Graham is essentially saying and simply wants to have a conversation about it. It's disappointing, but not surprising, that they simply refuse to engage in conversation with him and they just resort to pathetic discreditation. Humans are just scared of being wrong.
@@khalidhussein5346 I don't think, Khalid, that one can construct an argument on the basis of what might conceivably exist in areas that haven't been explored. If indeed Hancock's Atlantis was an advanced technological civilisation, they would at least have had ocean going ships. Their artefacts would then appear in distant places, just as Roman artifacts have been found in India and even in China. If just one completely anomalous object appeared anywhere in the world, then Hancock would have something to go on. And every archaeologist would be delighted to unearth such a thing too.
@@colinjames2346 can you not? I personally think that is a more than valid argument especially as people like Hancock and Carlson are already bringing other things to the table that appear to go against what we originally thought to be the case. Why are these areas remaining unexplored and why do they seem reluctant to do so? I'm not for one minute saying that Hancock is definitely right but surely it is worth getting round a table and having a mature conversation about it to debate? That's my issue with the whole thing, just blatant human narcissism and arrogance towards someone who is simply offering an alternative theory.
Easy to cover up that,underwater structures have been found though,maybe there is more to this earth as far as land mass than we are led to believe…..what lurks up above Antarctica for example….
@Khalid Hussein Hancock thinks all the astronomers, geologists, historians and archaeologists in the world are wrong and he is right, no one is more blatantly narcissistic than Hancock.
Hancock and Carlson are doing so much good!
They are the biggest hucksters, conning people for book sales, overpriced speaking fees and RUclips clicks.
Everyone of his claims have been thoroughly debunked.
He purposely fails to mention stronger contrary evidence and cherry picks weaker science, misrepresents it, and flat out lies about it. He is the opposite of reason, logic, and honesty. Then he cries the "mainstream academia" is attacking him.
It's a old con man trick that "mainstream academia" doesn't fall for, and neither should you.
Or so much bad
@@Peak_Stone how so?
@@Peak_Stone bet you pay your TV license too you fool!
@@surfk9836 bet you pay the BBC a TV license don't you? Poor little sheep
Hancock's critics and detractors most often mischaracterize his position. As he states in the video, he is NOT an "ancient astronaut" advocate. He is NOT saying the lost civilization was more advanced than we are today. He is NOT saying the bulk of modern archeological results are wrong.
He IS saying there is enough unknown, enough unexplored, enough evidence to warrant a CONVERSATION about the possibility.
Why is mainstream so unwilling to have a conversation?
And even now there are parts of the world with subsistence farmers and on other parts of the planet they are making rockets going in to space. Why could it not be possible that there could have been advanced cultures sitting beside subsistence farmers like today? He is often claimed to be a Pseudo scientist, and he has never claimed to be a scientist. Always think they have already lost the argument if they just stick to name calling, rather than actually discuss some of Graham's evidence.
Religion
He wrote a book about how people used to live on Mars
if he told a minimum of truth, he wouldn't have so much space in the media
@@Grrrr3FKAGrrrrGrrrrGrrrr can I get the name of that book, would love to read it.
I was in the great pyramid 45 years ago. You can’t imagine. You really can’t. Not one mark, embellishment or even decorative archway anywhere. Cold, austere, just …..there. And now we know there are thousands more all over the earth. Even bigger.
Gives a completely new meaning to “the Stone Age”.
I was there 23 years ago but unfortunately it was closed for "restoration" and I wasn't allowed in 🙄.
More like the Lapidary age…… the builders were Masters of the Stone Age
We’re just monkeys of the tech age 😂
@@justinstuart8382 …bummer for you. I can’t imagine what they could restore on mammoth rocks. There was some manmade lighting and a very steep wooden ladder/staircase thing that went up to the “king’s chamber”, which was a medium size room with a broken granite box in it. No decorations or architectural design anywhere. The other tombs we visited were carved with images from floor to ceiling. I always thought the caravans coming through the desert found the pyramids and camped there for a while waiting for the builders to come back, because obviously they were in charge of the world. Eventually it turned into Cairo, an unplanned city with haphazard streets. Again, my imagination.
Realy very strange.Withaut mark,decorativ,picture .Totaly strange,nonhuman practice.
Probably nonhuman origin.
@Balkanic Is she now a mummy??😂
Love Graham. No matter what they throw at him he keeps asking questions and highlighting their inconsistences. I salute you sir. X
What inconsistencies? Let's have a go at answering them
@@JP-je6jg we could start with there was no evidence of civilisation prior to Sumer? Moving onto the Incas built the Andes Citadels? When they said they did not? Nipping across to carbon dating .... it cannot date stone and the material they cite could have been situated there after construction. I will finish off with the water erosion of the sphinx? As a history graduate i was taught history relies on it's sources and interpretation. The sources are requiring further interpretation. That is all Hancock has really ever argued for.
@@yvonnesmith2115 well presumably as a historian, you must understand that you need to look at multiple sources. So it strikes me as odd that you used Robert Schochs theory on water erosion on the sphinx...when multiple other geologists who have worked on the sphinx have discredited his ideas (Colin reader and Rob Schneiker to name 2). Arguments that as far as I'm aware, he has never answered (there is a very good video on the World of Antiquity RUclips channel on the subject). Have you looked at the alternative theories put forward by other geologists?
Well if we hadn't found sites, if the only evidence available pointed to more primitive cultures, why would the theories make stuff up? For someone who claims to have 2 degrees, you seem oddly dismissive of the scientific process 🤔. I'd also say there is a world of difference between finding a site like Gobekli tepi, a site verifiably dated to 10,000 years ago, and making literally baseless assertions about the age of the pyramids. He has no evidence, all he does is speculate.
Carbon dating is just 1 method for dating historic sites and items. Again, surely your big fancy history degree should tell you that?
I'm afraid you have me at a disadvantage on the Inca, so il just have to take you at your word on that one...🤣
@@JP-je6jg He doesn't make baseless assertions. He's travelled the world for decades researching, and this is where it has lead him.
@@notreally2406 hahahaha I mean iv watched his videos so I know he does make baseless assertions, 'This mark here is a clear sign of an ancient cataclysm.' 'This structure is older than mainstream archaeologists would have us believe'...based off what evidence Graham? He never says.
A man who has walked through the fire and never gave up. Things he suggested over 20 years ago that were laughed at and ridiculed have turned out to be plausable. A massive megalithic site dating back to a time period that previously was not possible and evidence building for a cataclysm in time period he suggested back then.
Don't be fooled by the haters and don't take his ideas as fact. He doesn't say this idea is fact, yet academics get so angry and worry the 'stupid people' are being duped by his ideas. Academics duped everyone with the Clovis first model which has now been proven wrong.
We really don't know everything as there is still so much to discover so keep your mind open.
He is a tough man. X
I bet getting loads of money from selling sensationalist books helps 🤣.
Hmm...you don't seem to understand how academia works.
Academics didn't dupe anyone with the clovis first model...it was based off the information available at the time. As new discoveries were made that suggested it wasn't true...opinions started to change. There is a National geographic article from 2007 that is easily googled, that highlights how the understanding has changed.
No archaeologists or historian ever says we know it all. That's why they keep digging...to find new stuff. It was an archaeologist who discovered gobekli tepe and continues to work on it...not Hancock. Why has he never made such a discovery?
Well said.
hie is a glorified arrogant delusional junkie.
@@JP-je6jg i agree that is how historians should work. However it is not the point that the academics were correct at the time that they made that assertion it is the fact that they bully and silence debate. That is the problem. If you are comfortable with a world that you are told what the facts are and no one can question them you must have enjoyed the last 2 years.
There used to be a period when mainstream archeologists thought that Troy was a legendary city. Graham is revolutionazing approach to Archeology.
agreed! Graham is near the top of a new field called Pseudoarchaeology. look it up, it's a super fascinating topic.
@@jeffmccloud905 Thank you 👍! I would recommend you to watch 'Learn how to troll for beginners' look it up, you should start there!
No he isn't.
When he says mainstream archaeology, what he means is people who actually study and work to understand he societies and cultures they are working on. Graham Hancock is a journalist. Would you trust a journalist to represent you in court? Or build you a house? Or operate on you?
He is very welcome to train as an archaeologist and use his new skills to go and make discoveries based off his ideas. In fact I wonder why he hasn't ever made any discoveries?
He questions the existence of atlantis...well if its so old...why was Plato the first person to mention it? Where are these egyptian records? Where is the story in Solon's recorded work? It's possible it was influenced by the eruption of Thera, but that was 1500 BCE...not 9000 bce.
He also says archaeologists just speculate...which is hilarious because that is all he ever does.
@@jeffmccloud905 pseudoarcheology isn't a field of study...pseudo means fake...fake archaeology
@@JP-je6jg I was being sarcastic. Whoosh
Absolutely LOVED the new Netflix series "Ancient apocalypse"! Very well made and definitely looking forward to the next season!
I've watched it twice already
Is it confirmed there's going to another season? (Please 🙏 say yes)
@@stu2333 there must be a second season… he didn’t speak about the megalithic architecture for example (giant stone blocks), there were no pyramids, and not much talk about Atlantis … 😊
And the series is a massive success on Netflix.
@@patrick.991 cheers , I've got two episodes to watch so wasn't sure how it ended. Number 2 in the UK and USA is pretty dam good.
I've watched all his podcast episodes on Joe Rogan and read all of his books from Fingerprints of Gods to America Before. They're fantastic. All of them. I'm so glad his Netflix series is doing so well. He deserves the recognition for the amazing work he has done. Randall Carlson is the man too.
Bravo Graham.Thank you for your fantasttic work.
Keyword: "fantasttic"
i honestly believe your work is more valueable than that of all the archeologists who refute you for nothing!
Just egos and paychecks...
But you obviously haven't looked at the people who have debunked him, just his warped perspective. Hancock is on for the paycheck scamming people who he knows won't research
@@kinfolkcanine4281
Or math, science, and logic.
Hancock's BS only works on stoners
Have you ever read a book or article by an actual archaeologist? Please do...your comment is just horribly ignorant. Please tell me at any point in any of his work, where Hancock evidences his points with actually verifiable proof?
He mentions atlantis...well why was plato the first person to mention it? Please look it up, no egyptian mentions of it, nothing from Solon, his alleged source.
Isn't that strange 🤔.
All he does is speculate. He offers literally nothing positive to the study of history.
@@stevencoardvenice .....🤣 bless you. Did you actually read my points?
I'm arguing against Hancock. I am passionately against his pseudoarcheological bullcrap. He does nothing but speculate and undermine genuine academic work that helps us understand the world.
Graham is everywhere atm! As a long-time fan of his, this makes me very happy
Love Graham, so glad you’re still at it. You have been quite an inspiration to me . One day they will catch up and get it and start to learn.
Graham Hancock is fighting for truth and against stupidity and ignorance. A frustrating task in today's world.
What graham is saying in the second segment is “the truth is somewhere between written history, and archeological observation, but most likely based in reality”
Graham Hancock is a legend and an inspiration , the world would do well to listen to him
It's always nice to see people who know their stuff and are passionate about it like this man.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
You are trolling, you must be.
@@gillessalermo6470 Its ok to disagree. Stay with what you know. LIke pizza and beer and football.
@@sparky7915 You almost got me, like the pizza beer stuff almost got me into paragraph mode. Nicely done.
@@sparky7915 Are you taking a shot at the title of 'World's most gullible man'?
That man is a living legend and I fear it will only be fully realised when he's gone. He's done truly pioneering and game changing work that sadly many write off as pseudoscience, partly because a lot of his research contradicts the old academic's archaic and obsolete findings, they really don't like it and react bitterly as a result, many trying to ruin his reputation. Thankfully as time has passed more and more of Graham''s theories have been proven correct. Anyone who hasn't dedicated a few hours to listen to this man speak on on a podcast is really missing out, but be warned, it will inevitably induce a totally involuntary but extremely enjoyable rabbit hole exploration that could last days!
@@justinstuart8382 I'm envious mate, although I would probably wind him up beyond belief with too many questions! You can tell he's a gent with impeccable manners, sadly they don't make many men like that anymore..
@@justinstuart8382 that's great! I was planning on doing the same but some heath issues have made that impossible in recent times but I'm confident I will make it to see him soon. If only to thank him for the help and hours of entertainment he's given me during some tough times in my life regarding health, nothing brightens the day like a Graham Hancock podcast after all. I think my copy of that book is getting up there in age too. Cheers!
@@rjim1 I actually let him be when I first saw him because I knew I would do the same. First I just said hello and then let him settle. Later that evening we all had dinner with Andrew Colins , Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira.
@@justinstuart8382 I bet that was a fantastic experience! You're not wrong about 2015 being a different era too, you really never know what tomorrow holds and this is why I'm truly thankful and cherish each day I'm awarded on this beautiful planet of ours.
Total horseshit. Graham Hancock is to archaeology as Kent Hovind is to biology.
Love Graham and his books and lectures.
Total horseshit. Graham Hancock is to archaeology as Kent Hovind is to biology.
Me too.He is fantastic.Thank you Graham for your genius work.
@@eduardmarkovic6063 And he thanks you for being another sucker.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
@@sparky7915 _"Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances"_
Pseudoscientific nonsense. One might as well believe in leprechauns and Easter bunnies as all the codswallop you mention.
It's wonderful to have someone spend thirty years putting this all together congratulations and thank you bravely telling the truth
You are the true inspiration for younger generations. Thank you for being true to yourself and Sharing your wisdom to us Graham. Doesn’t matter who believes you or not but what matters is that you keep going with your work, which is incredibly a true fact . I truly believe there was the lost civilisation with all the evidences now came out as a documentary in Netflix.
Full support for you Graham. Keep fighting ❤
Very glad for this blog and to publicly show huge support for Graham Hancock, and Netflix series, and all the guys and gals who are making history researching lost Ancient History.
Great synthesis on what Mr. Hancock explained thoroughly in his TEDx talk six years ago.
True hero. Keep it up Graham ...we need you.
Need him for what? The dissemination of bullshit? Graham Hancock is to archaeology as Kent Hovind is to biology.
@@AlbertaGeek prove it!
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
He's very impressive and smart enough to take a multi-disciplinary approach. Archaeologists seem blinkered by comparison.
Around the same 11500 yrs ago an ancient port city in South India called "Poombuhar" or "Kaveropoompatinam" was destroyed due to rising sea levels. This city is found to be around 250 Square kilometres wide and was doing sea trade with Greeks, Romans, Arabs and Chinese. Graham Hancock has also researched about this city and estimated the age of this port city as 15000 yrs old. Possibly the world's first civilisation with advanced developments in todays Tamilnadu in South India. There are lot of Sangam period literatures which talk about the length and breath of this city and its structure in greater details.
Ancient Apocalypse is a great series! Well done Graham Hancock and Netflix! More please !
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Graham, you and your wonderful colleagues are a true glimmer of hope in our rigid restrictive world. Call it intuition but I resonate deeply with the idea that our human species is much more complex and ancient than current scholars allow in their text books. You only have to look at the way modern humans follow rigid rules of religion, Christianity, Islam and Judaism being the main reason that this information is suppressed and proves how control and dogma shape our current human story. The control evidently spills over by banning Graham from sites and blatantly disregarding evidence that is smacking the archeologists and historians in the face by never digging deeper. If anything their arrogance makes Grahams thoughts and ideas even more interesting and credible. It’s a war on dogma but I have a very strong feeling vindication is coming!
Wait a minute, why are you blaming Religion/God for people that do not believe in God or religion, blaming/persecuting Hancock. That makes no sense to me.
@@kickerpunter8414 I think you know exactly what I’m saying and just trying to stir the pot. Religion is dogma, dogma is control, control is sensorship, rigidity and rules that are integral forces upon us from being children, forced to partake in church services and read the dogmatic text books in schools never opening free thought or investigation. I’m sure you catch my drift. If most of the people living in Egypt didn’t follow Islam right now someone may actually allow deeper excavation. If America wasn’t so engrained in Christian BS it may allow the notion that Serpent Mound is far older and a deeper look. We know that the truth of a much older advanced civilisation will impact religion today as it doesn’t work with their timelines.
@@acacianilotica4497 I see it differently. I think they attack Graham because he espouses a view about a great flood & that's just too close for comfort to these evolutionary "bible" thumpers. They hate God & anything that even comes close to backing up the Bible or anything of possibility about his existing, as "DANGEROUS." Look around you. Notice things, notice patterns. Don't just believe what you hear b/c it sounds good.
No Christians are espousing things that hurt people. If they've clung on to morality, your'e now seeing why it was so important... If you just look around you & use your brain/intellect. Respectfully
@@kickerpunter8414 Christian’s clinging on to Morality ? I politely disagree but thank you for your thoughts, I agree they attack Graham because he dares to open up Pandora’s box. I never ever believe what I hear because it sounds good. If that were case my life would have gone on a very different path. I hope you are looking around and also using your brain to the best that is can be! Respectfully
Love this comment
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
The thing is that the evidence is there, mainstream academy just wont accept it since it doesnt fit their model.
@@MrRyukami show me then
Which is the problem for a lot of his detractors who just point to their own flawed (incompletely) evidence to disprove him.
3:05 You’ll notice that Graham always shows respect to the existing theories and suggests that they may need to be re-examined… hardly an attack.
we’ve discovered multiple ancient megalithic sites like Göbekli Tepe and The scientific community chooses to ignore the blatant evidence.
Sooo good to se hancock back in action
Nothing in the ancient Greek books is fiction! They have deliberately tried to say it is mythology in that way they discredited it!
Same as The Maharabata
Well said graham
keep up the research, more discovered every day. history of mankind will naturally change as these discoveries are presented. having an open mind surely will allow us to learn what has happened in times gone past.
Love this guy
This man is a legend.
I watched Ancient Apocalypse and found it very interesting. I did not know that there were large sophisticated structures dating so far back. I thought that Hancock presented some convincing arguments, but I would like to hear the other side of the argument as well. Does anyone know of a good rebuttal source?
They say hunter gatherers built them or they say they must be natural and not man made
No there is no good rebuttal, mainstream archaeologists write off the notion that these structures could be much older than we originally thought. They are hiding something and I’m sure one day we will find out the truth about our roles here on earth and how we became what we are now.
thats the thing, they have no decent argument against hancock...... all they ever say is he's a drug taking lunatic..... not exactly a great argument when he clearly puts the work in and help teach us all a more credible theory than mainstream crap
The only other explanation is just hunter-gatherers, there's nothing else
pretty much any decent book on the topics of history, geology, anthropology and biology are enough to crush this charlatan, but the more the better.
He might sound convincing but he is just a good liar - cherrypicking facts, relying on grey areas where there is not a lot of archeological evidence and using mythology and stories as actual literal facts.
Is there a full length version of this interview?
keep going Graham you're doing great
I’m so curious what he thinks of Tesla’s views of the pyramids in Egypt and how they were utilized for a wired, gold and copper based system of electricity, fueled by the natural spring / waterways under the pyramids. It’s not magic. It’s actually a very reasonable theory.
I first met Graham at the Glastonbury Crop Circle Symposium circa 1999 where he was presenting his latest book. And again in Montréal April 2019 presenting his "America Before" book. On both occasions he took time to talk to you and answer questions, he is very approachable person, what you see is what you get. Nice guy.😅😊
Glad to see ideas like this becoming widely heard.
I love this guy! Graham, you are a humble prophet of the modern age. Thank you for the work that you have done. Without your sacrifices we - humanity with amnesia - would be in a darker dark.
Prophet of modern age xD xD xD
He is always making wierd claims about "most archaeologists", and he doesn't even have anything close to a degree in anything that matters, least of all a PhD (yeah, he doesn't have one).
Remember that this guy has EVERYTHING to win with all of these claims he is making. Economically, his books saw a huge spike after his Netflix documentary. This should make us cautious about believing his message.
The arrogance of academics knows no bounds, if it doesn't fit their model it's wrong.
Graham Hancock is very knowledgeable, and I believe him over the woke brigade any day.
Egyptologists are woke now!?!
Hawass & co are close minded, but woke ffs?
@@baabaabaa2293 Hawass is protecting Egypt’s version of history as the first advanced technical civilisation to the point that he has refused permission to explore the known void below the sphinx. Quite possibly because it is claimed that it holds the proof that Atlantean’s settled in both Egypt and Golbekli Tepi following the submergence of their home.
@@aardvarkrevolution5764 l blv ur right on both counts. Hawass shd allow excavation beneath the Sphinx, as well as a proper search of the doors they found in the pyramids in the 90s...then went quiet on...
I saw they've found another settlement in Turkey...shd be interesting.
@@baabaabaa2293 Yes, the monolithic site in Turkey will be Golbekli Tepi. Academia will have it that 11,600 years ago only hunter gatherer’s lived in the area. Now they discover a site with extraordinary monolithic structures which before being abandoned were deliberately buried. My original comments really refer to academics not being willing to accept any evidence that doesn’t endorse their established narrative. As with more recent events - the science is never settled.
@@aardvarkrevolution5764 no worries mate..
And yeah why bury the site like they did?
Some of the carving lve seen is similar to Sumerian & other sites around the world.... we've definitely missed & been misled on a lot of history.
With Egypt, l blv ur right, protection of the tourist dollar & grants they get for excavation at other digs.
This man is a legend!
This man is a clown.
It is always love to hear Sir Graham Hankok Speech... He explained very clearly & with proper facts.
If the people in power never hid information from us for thousands of years and we grew up knowing the truth from the onset... mankind would not be so blind and would be more open minded... we are now living in an era where the truth needs to come out and mankind needs to take off its blinders. We have been monopolized by the ones in power for too long and need to understand our true purpose and heritage in this world. The book of Enoch was my very first eye opener... I'm now looking forward to watching this series in the Hope's to more answers to my many many questions about life
I grew up on farms in Africa. No Phone, no TV, Just the stars. The ape has looked at the stars for a very long time and good observation is good science.
The Great Awakening is a glorious time to be alive if you're awake
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
The story of Dwarka and Kumari kandam are also very similar to present day altantis story
Mr. Hancock has been doing what anyone involved in the sciences ought to always be doing, which is asking themselves the difficult questions about the things which don’t fit the paradigm. He is worth ten of every archaeologist who ever lived.
love and respect to you, Graham Hancock. your work is invaluable
Your works ARE invaluable
Your work IS invaluable
Either of these would have been a correct way to structure your statement.
@@nickfrost9771 thanks? I removed the S. now go fold your under pants.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Actually, the person who really broke this story was Immanuel Velikovsky and the Thunderbolts Project has refined much of what he said. There seems a fixation on the event corresponding to the Younger/Dryas, but the Thunderbolts Project has proved rather conclusively that these events were occasioned by the change from a much different solar system in which Saturn was captured by the current main sequence star. Because these conjectures are associated with a very different cosmology even much of what Hancock believes is probably too uniformitarian to be correct. It would also help if he made some attempt to sync up with Velikovsky, David Talbott, and Dwardu Cardona, instead of insisting that he is a uniquely insightful scholar. After all, it was Velikovsky who wrote *Mankind in Amnesia* not Hancock.
The pyramid design was inspired or provoked by the sacred mountain which was a giant pillar in the sky created by plasma streaming between the Earth and Mars during the polar configuration. It was inspired by an archetype which, in its origin, was provoked by an actual cosmic event lasting thousands of years and seen by almost everyone on the planet, at least north of what was then the equator (which is not the equator of today).
ruclips.net/video/UkPpR8t1qvk/видео.html
The lolling tongue seen in many depictions of the primary god was a visual artifact of the same cosmic phenomenon.
Quetzalcoatl was simply a giant plasma emission in what is called "arc mode," something that Anthony Peratt identified as associated with the "Thunderbolt of the Gods". Cardona identifies it much more specifically with the cometary Venus.
The beard which is sometimes identified as whiskers is, like the feathers, commonly associated with dragons. And they are, again, a manifestation of plasma in arc mode. Hancock's interpretation of this phenomenon as a person is too conventional, and is probably the result of later modifications to a much earlier mythology that more properly identifies the provocating cosmology.
Interesting contribution to this list of comments. I will have a look into Immanuel Velikovsky and the Thunderbolts Project. There are many ways to interpret and speculate on what has gone before. I also diverge in my speculation and am always interested in other people's ideas. Thanks for your input.
@@Demosophist yeah I liked your points, hats off.
I still believe hancocks story is fascinating because that was the first time I was confronted with such an idea. I've always thought that the history of mankind was weird with how it was taught in school and that everyone believed in.
Very interesting man. It does make me chuckle that he paints a more interesting picture of history than the mainstream do!
Wish he spoke about the yonaguni monument in the series
He did that 25 years ago in great series on Channel 4. Very hard to find it now
@@MrRugbylane Pretty sure it's been uploaded to RUclips again recently
Yonaguni is a quarry , I'm speaking from experience of decades of working in dimensional stone extraction. So where are the buildings ?
Cross fingers for season 2
@@nickashton5242 long ago washed away by the power of the oceans
Their is a hidden message in the pyramids written in a universal language, mathematics.
The megalithic evidence is undeniable. Our current view of history needs to be updated with other options - considering new ideas is at the heart of all scientific research fields. The history taught in schools for a century is written by Victorian explorers driven by religious bias and lacking modern dating/radar technology. The idea that some of these century old ideas might need updating is a no-brainer. Mr Hancock has a great way of opening up the history and talking about alternatives. It's called critical thinking. Bravo Graham, Bravo!
His theories are very interesting.. respect
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
I believe they knew more back then than what we know now
The number of people “upset” or “afraid” of GH are really showing their own intellectual & scientific fragility.
Best comment 🇦🇺
They don’t want their caveman theory to fall apart …hunter gatherer bs 🤷🏼♂️😏✌🏻
He is a super bad ass. Great post. They haven't done there homework. I love it.
Go Graham! Your support to an open mind is growing!
It's a joy to listen to Graham Hancock and Randall carlson, especially when they are invited to the Joe Rogan Experience. The series on Netflix is very well made, but focuses a little bit too much on the "main stream science archeology" and the more "open interpretation by Hancock" divide in my opinion, but it is still great that people can make up their own minds about our past. The series gives credit to our mysterious past and discoveries like Göbekli Tepe have shaken our foundations tremendously in recent years, that makes history very exciting.
GT hasn't shaken any foundations; it has just posed more questions about human development in the Near East.
@@edelgyn2699 the discovery of GT has put the timeline back a few thousand years. Mesopotamia (Sumer) was considered to be the most ancient civilization until GT was discovered. Its discovery has led to new questions on the nature of hunter gatherers developing to be sedentary farmers. I would say that has created quite a stir. It's exciting that so much of our past is still waiting to be unearthed. It appears that GT might have been covered with dirt and rocks on purpose, I find that intriguing, why would one put so much effort in building these sites only to hide them from view many years later?
Thank you Graham for all the work, for moving against the dogma when it's absolutely necessary and very grounded.
We need more free thinkers like this. The old crowd of archaeologists with the 'We have all the answers so stop asking stupid questions ' arrogance need to be ignored.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
I'm also a big Cayce fan.
I have been following Graham Hancock for many years and totally adhere to his point of views.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
Graham Hancock is my favourite. God bless 🙏
Brilliant Hancock. Establishments opposition is proof his concepts are a challenge and correct.
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
the ego of humanity is unfortunately concerned with WHO is right rather than WHATS right , at this stage all viewpoints are valid and should be explored , after all isn't that the basis for science . whats right not whose right should point the way , hanccok and may others have great points
Well said my friend, the people of this world are taught not to think for themselves.
@@damonbeddingfield2958 exactly, and we've had a glimpse of that for the past two and a half years.
I really enjoy Graham Hancock ideas and hypothesizes, it's ok to think outside the box. People who work in any field as a specialist are only as good as the knowledge they are taught, it doesn't mean they are always right. I think he is not saying believe in his idea's, he is telling you to have a look for yourself and make an informed decision for yourself. Stop being a surface reader and have a more opened mind.
No, he's $elling nonsense to people who are unable to reason and recognise the nonsense he's pedalling.
@@edelgyn2699 Oh your one of those people....which is fine, everyone is entitled to there own opinion, but it's still a valid hypothesis.
I saw the serie on Netflix Apocalypse. I knew about Gizeh, but your story of all places on the world signs to 12800. Beautiful. I also read that when Planet X (Niburu) comes along that planet have a lots of meteors and debris. So they also say that now is the time that planet X is nearby the planet :) Also sleeping prophet Edgar Gayce say that the planet get a earth shift. Each year the planet shift 55 km a year. So their happens a lot :) Tnx for your information Gramham. Greetings Rob
I agree with Graham's theory, the timeline doesn't make sense that we sprung up in a short time, built pyramids and Stonehenge, then just forgot how to do it. Science is about questioning and constantly learning more to better understand our universe. If you get hung up in dogma instead of always questioning, you've lost the point in the exploration and discovery.
Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.
Yet you choose to believe Hancock and don't question his nonsense?
@@edelgyn2699 You call it nonsense with nothing of your own. You my friend are the problem.
Archeological establishment can't swallow, that outsider was first to see a broader picture and connect the dots.
I've been listening to Mr Hancock since the 90s.
Graham should be our prime minister !!! He'd hate it,but he's so brilliantly honest & real !
Valuable real estate indeed, especially where a river flows into the sea. A major archaeological effort is needed in such locations. Difficult as they are now covered with about 120m of water - too deep for conventional diving which realistically is only useful for the top 20 or 30meters and at a pinch with special diving mixes and underwater habitats, to, say, 90m.
... revelation...or... Revelation...same difference...thank you Graham...
love this guy....he says as it is ....not always right ...but the who is to say he is wrong ....so much we dont know .... mainstream ideas been proven wrong so many times ... he thinks outside the box .... so many things in history do not add up .. keep going mr hancock ... top guy
Twas extremely interesting to hear about the dimensions of the pyramid. I'll apologise now Graham, as I've still not started the show on Netflix yet. I will do tomorrow matey.
I don't necessarily agree with him or Randal Carlson on most of their speculations HOWEVER, I cannot agree with the generally accepted ideas of how many ancient sites were built, they just do not add up. So I think it is very important to listen to people like this because science is always about questioning.
Question what Hancock tells you - it's codswallop for people who enjoy fantasies.
@@edelgyn2699 so are the accepted ideas
a lesson in not judging a video by the title. i was all ready for calling another Hancock a nutjob, but i totally agree, As much as i like archaeology it can't give us all the answers, it just fills bits of the jigsaw.
Where do they get the #43,200 from?
They're all just mad because Graham Hancock is the first person this century to make Archaeology exciting.
And they're even angrier because he's coming with evidential arguments, not the psuedoscience they accuse him of.
Truth. I avoided listening to Hancock for years because of all the smears against him by the skeptic community. Today I finally sat down to listen to him debate Michael Shermer on Rogan. Hancock wiped the floor with him for over three hours. Shermer had nothing--he just kept demanding evidence, which Hancock delivered, and Shermer would just move the goalpost every time because he couldn't dispute his points.
It's becoming increasingly clear that these people who constantly cast stones are themselves living in glass houses.
Uh, no, he is not producing evidence of anything other than he badly needs a good psychiatrist.
Mr. Hancock is a Titan...and History will remember him as such.
At first ridiculed...however now, he's already been substantiated in his lifetime with Gobekli Tepe.
We have been intentionally lied to, folks!
I think we(humans) are trying to forget a trauma that wiped civilization off the face of the Earth.
That would explain it. Fear
True, the Graham Hancock grift has been going on for quite some time.
Obviously, the Egyptian priests knew Atlantis sunk 9000 years earlier.
You are on the right track, and "Academia" will continue to obstruct you and others at every turn as you have already discovered. The bigger question that needs to be asked is why?
For that you have to go back to the drawing board, and start with a completely new canvas. Without throwing the baby out of the bath, one has to re-piece the jigsaw puzzle but this time put aside all prejudice and preconceptions and then hopefully what will emerge is a picture that none of us could have ever imagined. You remind me of "Scully out of the X-Files" which isn't too far from the truth in all fairness.
Academia, is fearful that if humanity truly discovers its real origins it would literally freak everyone out. The "Smithsonian Institute" has collected, and stored all the evidence that would be proof enough to validate that it is all true. However in their opinion mankind is not ready for this news to go mainstream. The fallout is unimaginable, in short. Anarchy, would throw our world into utter chaos. The order, or status quo would be no more.
Ironically the so called powers at be have been gradually leaking this to us, in what they believe to be a safe-guarding way to ease us to accepting disclosure. The problem that they had is underestimating humankind to actually be far more accepting than making out that we were all ignorant. When I discovered sometime back that the so called "Great Pyramid of Giza" wasn't actually so great in the end. It became very clear that there was "Academia" who now had something to hide, which they have been protecting us from.
The downside is no one appointed them to do that in the first place, as I don't recall being asked, do you? Satire, is so useful. There has been much speculation, and whilst the "Great Flood" does make itself present in many a religion and folklore, I have an alternative explanation which will blow you away.
Agree almost entirely with your observations. Here in South Africa the evidence is overwhelmingly that an unknown civilization did indeed exist. There are numerous geoglyphs of enormous dimensions, faithfully recorded by Google Earth now that they produce higher resolution images. I have screen saved hundreds of images of these and of other intriguing outlines of villages, especially along the African east coast, and towns with serpentine walling. In good faith, I emailed a well known local archeologist, photos of inscriptions on a large rock located in the khami complex. I even highlighted enough of the inscriptions to indicate how symbols were repeated. His reply, to say the least, was indignant with all these !!!!!???? Yes, political archaeology exists.
And no, I'm not giving away co-ordinates. Not until someone shows enough interest to take the matter up. Besides, anyone can find the same evidence.
I'm sorry no, that is utter bullshit.
Let's look at the world right now.
Russian invasion of Ukraine is killing thousands of innocent people and causing havoc around the world.
The cost of living crisis is making basics a struggle to afford, fuel, heating your home, even feeding your family. People's ability to survive is really being affected.
The very essence of democracy is being challenged by lies and misinformation. Social media is warping people's minds with specific algorithms deigned to keep us addicted to our phones and various apps.
Here in the UK, crazy government policies caused interest rates to rocket, meaning people can't afford their mortgages...even affluent families are now struggling.
Now with all that going on...tell me why the hell people would give a crap about how old the sphinx is? How does knowing if the sphinx is 12000 or 4500 years old help a mother feed her child? Or a father make his mortgage payments? It just doesn't matter to pretty much any ordinary person.
Look at all the most important people in the world, the Elon musks, the Jeff Bezos, Trump, Oprah, Jay Z, Lionel Messi, Xi xingping, Joe Biden....can you point to any of them as archaeologists or historians? They have no power, people by an large don't care. I work in a museum and I csn tell you, people remember about 8% of what they see. People don't care about dates. There is no big conspiracy to hide it from us...People just don't care. Grow up.
What a brilliant term…………… political archaeology … it’s spot on & I like it👌🏼
There are several reasons why history is being prevented and subsequently why it should be revealed.... first one that comes to mind is how true history would reveal how utterly ridiculously our past has been "revealed". For many years , institutions, academics, politicians have lauded over the "truth" and guiding policy and laws governing the peoples of the world. The major religions, the Trumps, the super wealthy have very much benefited from this confusion of facts and errors within errors. Academic archeologists who are so afraid of contradicting their colleagues have unwittingly bolstered the great lie. It goes without saying that wars, hunger and poverty start and stop with religion and the politics that accompany them.
A great reveal about true history would utterly destroy the institutional lies and the accompanying greed and they know it. It could throw world order into chaos if it was discovered that great civilisations had existed in our past, that were for example, far more successful and peaceful. Does not everyone deserve a spot in the sunshine?
Do we think for one minute that homo sapiens, who have existed and evolved for hundreds of thousands of years with the same brain capacity as modern man were all backward and somehow inferior to us? Capacity for deceit is demonstrated in nearly all forms of life on this planet and was probably a necessary component for existence but surely , nothing like the power and greed demonstrated by the trumps, Putins and Bezos who thrive on the great lie, were necessary?
So yes, it matters that lies of this magnitude are revealed. It matters a great deal.
It’s interesting to hear Mr. Hancock say all of these things, because archaeologists really really don’t like him. I will share something up my own experience. I have met scientists, such as archaeologists, anthropologist, and, of course, historians in my lifetime. A lot of them are very intelligent, knowledgeable, and wise. Some of them are not. Some of them are presumptuous, defensive, arrogant, and somewhat insecure. I’m not really sure where that comes from but if you Dare to challenge certain viewpoints that those particular individuals or institutions, keep… You will encounter massive resistance, and they will become antagonistic and reject anything you say, after that point. They will not even entertain, listening to a logical statement, or rational argument about something they think they already know everything about. That being said, I have also met some wonderful archaeologists who truly are what they say they are… A student of the past. They know that there is much more left to learn, and they know that there is a lot more unknown than known. they understand that as the earth itself ages and changes… More archaeology and answers are revealed. Of course, along with that more questions arise. It’s interesting that there are many ancient texts and writings that talk about massive cataclysmic events, such as floods and fires and earthquakes. I have traveled to a number of countries around the world and seen evidence of these events. Some of the things cannot be explained by modern science. So I say… Why not think outside of the box and get creative with ideas about what may have happened? If what we are going through on the earth right now, is any indication of what could have happened or might have happened or actually did happen thousands of years ago… Who are we to say it cannot and did not?! to simply say that, you know everything about everything is the a pitta me of arrogance and borderlines on becoming evil. It is that type of elitist point of view that has landed all of humanity in the mess that we are in now. It’s time for change. I do not think we should simply except the opinions of academia as irrefutable fact anymore. I think we should except them as what we know so far, with room for more. I know that that’s going to piss them off, but I don’t really care. Only the ones who are guilty of being inflexible, need to worry about this. All the rest of the people out there who are doing fantastic work and research and crafting and excavating and hypothesizing, have my respect, and I would happily go along with them on a dig, or help them to analyze and clean up what they find. I’ve done it before. fortunately, archaeologists around the rest of the world are catching up with the times, and they are understanding now how little we know. It seems to be that only the ones in North America, and in isolated cases other countries just aren’t willing to budge on their previous positions. I will say one thing about Mr. Hancock, I don’t think the civilization was lost at all. I think part of it was totally destroyed. I don’t think that there are remnants or descendants. Still living on earth. No, I don’t think they were aliens. I think they were advanced human beings. People think that advanced civilization means advanced technology, but I think they are limiting themselves by that motive thinking. Advanced means more than just technology. It means an advanced higher way of thinking, learning, living, and applying knowledge and wisdom. We have advanced people living on earth now. They are the ones dreaming up things the rest of us wish we had thought of. We all have it within us to be like this. I agree with Mr. Hancock. I think the civilization was more or less wiped out with the exception of those who may have been chosen to survive, because they paid attention to the signs. Kind of like what’s happening in the world right now.
This should be titled ' Everything Graham Hancock knows about human history is wrong'.
You can’t handle the truth 🥳
Wow I'd like to sit and talk with him he had alot of good points
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
It’s interesting to note that Hindu texts mention the units of time, in which each Yuga Cycle lasts for 4,320,000 (solar) years
This dude is basically telling the real life version of One Piece's Void Century
Brilliant man
thanks for sharing this
You are absolutely right. There is nothing more annoying than inaccuracy caused by insufficient or skimpy research. I love it that you don't have a go at your critics, but quietly note their objections and answer them in a calm, civilised manner. That's the mark of real intelligence.
He doesn't do research. He's an author
Total horseshit. Graham Hancock is to archaeology as Kent Hovind is to biology.
@@jeffmccloud905 doesn’t do research but has just done a 8 part documentary series stop talking bollocks
@@jeffmccloud905 Have you ever written a book? Or read one for that matter, because only an illiterate person could legitimately say what you just did.
Research is all he’s done in over thirty years. Actual physical research, in person. He’s climbed the mountains, explored caves, tramped through actual jungles and investigated all these sites in person. He spent five years diving on sunken sites, he’s still diving now- in his seventies! He met the superb scientist that was in charge of the discovery of gobleki tepe, Klaus was the one who dug the thing up, he was the one who said it was deliberately buried and who dated it. He was a living legend when he was alive and still is now he’s passed, but he totally agreed with Graham.
This man is a research machine.
Egyptology seems to have made its mind up about 1860 and no one has been able to question it since then. Egyptian politics does not help.
Well done..👍.!
100% True from Mr.Hancock!!!
Thank you for that
We need to find Truth in management in our leaders
Currently I am reading Edgar Cayce's The Story of the Bible by Robert Krajenke. It explains spiritual concepts in the bible. Edgar Cayce was a minister and a clairvoyant. He could go into trances. He could diagnose people;s ailments when doctors could not. The person did not have to be there. The person could be on another continent. One day somebody asked him about something else. Edgar gave an answer. Then people would ask him questions about many different things including Jesus, Atlantis, afterlife, life on other planets. In all ha gave about 14 000 readings. Much of what he said has proven to be true. In this book he talks about how God created man and how came to be on earth. It confirms what Graham Hancock has been saying. The history of mankind is different from what we learned from experts. I hope Graham Hancock reads this book. it will really open his eyes.
This is what society is trying to do, create a single 'orthodox' voice, it's not just archaeology. THAT is the underlying problem.
It is extremely difficult to 'lose' a civilization. Hancock's Atlantis would have produced a large of artefacts peculiar to itself - not those of other early civilisations. To date, none have come to light. The reason archaeologists do not believe in Atlantis is because there is no archeological evidence for it.
But is a reason for that because, as Graham points out, there is still so much of our planet that hasn't been touched by archaeologists? Additionally they have no plans to research these areas. How can we ever truly be sure about the story without every square inch of the planet being researched thoroughly? That is all Graham is essentially saying and simply wants to have a conversation about it. It's disappointing, but not surprising, that they simply refuse to engage in conversation with him and they just resort to pathetic discreditation. Humans are just scared of being wrong.
@@khalidhussein5346 I don't think, Khalid, that one can construct an argument on the basis of what might conceivably exist in areas that haven't been explored.
If indeed Hancock's Atlantis was an advanced technological civilisation, they would at least have had ocean going ships. Their artefacts would then appear in distant places, just as Roman artifacts have been found in India and even in China. If just one completely anomalous object appeared anywhere in the world, then Hancock would have something to go on. And every archaeologist would be delighted to unearth such a thing too.
@@colinjames2346 can you not? I personally think that is a more than valid argument especially as people like Hancock and Carlson are already bringing other things to the table that appear to go against what we originally thought to be the case. Why are these areas remaining unexplored and why do they seem reluctant to do so? I'm not for one minute saying that Hancock is definitely right but surely it is worth getting round a table and having a mature conversation about it to debate? That's my issue with the whole thing, just blatant human narcissism and arrogance towards someone who is simply offering an alternative theory.
Easy to cover up that,underwater structures have been found though,maybe there is more to this earth as far as land mass than we are led to believe…..what lurks up above Antarctica for example….
@Khalid Hussein Hancock thinks all the astronomers, geologists, historians and archaeologists in the world are wrong and he is right, no one is more blatantly narcissistic than Hancock.
I'm on episode 3..food for thought.
You're being fed nonsense - throw it up!