Why Russia's Sukhoi Su-33 Fighter Was a Failure
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024
- The Su-33 has been involved in a number of accidents. Since entering service, at least three Su-33s have been lost in accidents, including one during a summer 2001 airshow in Russia.
As a result of these problems, the Su-33 has been considered a failure by some. It has been overshadowed by the newer Sukhoi Su-35, which is a more capable air superiority fighter that can also be operated from carriers. 
Наука
As someone who’s quick to call out bs Russian propaganda and its weaponry to be “overrated”, the SU-33 is not considered a failure (despite the navy’s shortcomings) and even if it was, the MiG-29k would have been in service for the Russian navy instead. Also the SU-35 is not a carrier based aircraft it is the more advanced/capable variant of the original SU-27 and currently the premiere air superiority fighter for the Russian Air Force.
be quick to call out bs western propaganda as well they are very good at it way better than russians
"as someone who's quick to call out bs Russian propaganda and it's weaponry to be overrated", doesn't every country do this?
@@sig5816 Yes to some extent, however the difference with Russia is they tend to completely lie and only sprinkling a little bit of truth. They mainly do this to promote their equipment to sell to other countries which is what they rely on for their economy. This has caused the Russian government to be consumed with its own lies believing their military is unstoppable without addressing the major issues.
Wonder why Russia not using MIG29K aircraft which are smaller, & much more potent naval aircraft
.....Theyve sold the same to India where they are working quite well.
@@In1221kc Yes the MiG-29k is an amazing craft in its own right but Russia selected the SU-33 because it better suited their requirements not because it was a better jet (I’m guessing range and payload).
It was then eventually they managed to sell the MiG to India.
Lol this is all wrong. 35's cannot be operated on carriers, yes the Russian carrier fleet is a failure but the 33 herself not so much. The Chinese variant is still kicking bigtime and operating on their carriers just fine! Trust me, I'm down to hate on foreign equipment at any opportunity lol...but I'm not going to do so with false facts...there's plenty to be said honestly so why make stuff up? That's what they do...we're above that aren't we?
You are wrong
@@jpjangra6070 no I'm not...I stay pretty current with my air power knowledge. Plus I stated several things and you didn't provide any correction whatsoever so...good day, troll.
this seems right Russians navy carrier strike group sucks but the aircraft does not this seems accurate
You may want to look up the F-35C, it is literally the carrier variant of the F-35, amd the F-35B, the STVOL variant, also carrier compatible.
Youre either too stupid amd lazy to actually know what youre talking about, or a foreugn operative who shkuld be silenced.
The Chinese version of the Su33 is the only state aircraft that is openly criticized in state media for being underpowered. The failure is the Short take off arrested landing approach with these aircraft being so large. If these aircraft were Is catapulted like US and French jets, they would be just fine.
When the narrator talks and sounds like he does, don’t trust anything they say about Russia.
Their is a lot wrong in this video and the Su-35 can’t be operated off carriers
The Su-33 has had many accidents because of the poor condition of the carrier and pilot training for example the Chinese navy operates the same class of carrier and a licensed version of the Su-33 and have never had an accident
Su-35 can't operate on the Russian Aircraft carrying cruiser
The question is if the inability to do so is due to the aircraft’s design being inherently incompatible with the design of the available Carrier… or is it that in spite of the design being suitably compatible with the available carrier, that the failure to operate from it in an operational capacity is the result of Russian shortcomings in keeping the carrier and the aircraft maintained to a nominal performance level.
Considering that the Admiral Kuznetsov’s power plant throws up so much smoke that personnel aboard the ISS could spot its location with the naked eye, and that it can go nowhere without an accompanying tug, serious consideration must be given to the the latter possibility.
The Su-35 isn’t operable from an aircraft carrier. Only the Su-33 & J-15 in the Flanker family of aircraft.
It definitely doesn’t help that the flankers, any of them, are only about two feet shorter than a Boeing B-17 which had a 10 man crew. That might help give perspective to how big this plane is.
I despise when people say "sue" instead of "ess-you"
in russian it is pronounced as "Soo" as in Sukhoi
Tbh, this cursed aircraft numeration goes nowhere. Its essentially upgrades and variants of the same Su-27 aircraft
A tailhook and a retractable arrestor gear? Please explain.
Isn’t the tail hook and retractable arrestor gear the same thing?
they also added canards to the su 33 but the su 35 cannot be used for carriers
In fairness to the Su-33, its accident rate was greatly increased by the thick cloud of black smoke around the carrier. They really should have installed terrain-following radar so it could land!
One aircraft carrier? What kinda superpower is that?
It's nation's that's considered a superpower with only one aircraft carrier or not one at all☠️. Having carriers are for power projection, that doesn't make you a superpower.
How's the f35 going??😂😂
S.U.-27/33/34/35
Not SUE‐XX
It is pronounced phonetically, not by saying the letters separately.
@@zyoungson215 didnt realise you were Sukhoi CEO
@@zyoungson215. So is it correct to call the Super Hornet a Fah-18, or is it F/A-18?
It Su, not S.U. and the words plastered on the screen are decided by a computer automatically. I doubt anyone spell checks it.
@@alfredvelazquez3306The Russian prounonciation is Soo
Problems with aircraft carriers?
Anyway, the carrier is not working?
THEY ONLY HAVE *ONE* AIRCRAFT CARRIER?
Dont say its a failure... Have u ever had a Dog Fight with the SU33?
That's a carrier? I thought that's a smoke generator for the fleet.
Russian approach: So lets redesign the carriers instead of accepting that ee failed😂
Never heard of an naval version of the SU-35?
This plane Looks great
It wasn't a failure, it had no carrier to land on🤣
whenever a career jet is large it's a confirm failure .
Not really a carrier, if it has to be towed around! 😂😂
Admiral Cuts Nutz Off?!!! W/a name like that I see why they only have one!
Yer but how many fridge
Parts did it take 😂
In DCS its not a failure at all if you know how to properly use it
Russian carrier is maded only as a showcase... Russians don't need carriets, ergo, they dont need 33s
They made it from junk?
LOVELY RUSSIAN MADE 🇷🇺
Did you even watch the video?
failure....till you meeting in a fight.......
Its a failure becauce its a carrier based aircraft. They have one carrier.
The Sukhoi SU33 is quite a capable aircraft in the hands of experienced & talented pilots! While the Sukhoi SU35 is not Carrier based capable! The Sukhoi SU33 added front canards indicate its Short Take-Off & Landing Capability! The Sukhoi SU33 is a popular model kit choice for aircraft modellers as it is a futuristic looking Sukhoi variant! 🙏🌷🌿🌍🕊
Don't the Russian Navy need a aircraft carrier first didn't the last carrier catch on fire and it in dry dock
The one aircraft carrier 😮
Russia should probs develop some more carriers if it wants a naval fleet that can stand up to nato
Does Russia have aircraftcarriers?
Sort of yes, sort of no. They have the Admiral Kuznetsov, but they call it an Aircraft Carrying Battlecruiser. It only carries 30 something Aircraft, but is much more heavily armed than any Western Aircraft Carrier with Cannons and Missiles and such. It was designed not to need to operate with a Carrier Battle Group, but on its own.
It was being finished as the old Soviet Union collapsed.
Realistically, it's been a failure. She spends more time in Port being repaired/patched over than doing anything useful. Rumour has it that everywhere she goes she has to be followed by a Tugboat, she breaks down so often. And her engines spew out so much black smoke she can be seen from a hundred Miles away.
They did send it to Syria when they were there. But, apart from that, I don't think she does much.
Google Admiral Kuznetsov. There's a ton of information. None of it complimentary.
This Sukhoi though was fine for its era really.
Sounds like this video is referring to the F35. A dismal failure of an aircraft, with so much crashes it’s not funny anymore. Every flight it takes it needs a new paint job for stealth. Unlike the SU57 it has both stealth inhibitors built into the aircraft and the alloys used makes it stealth as well. The F35 is just a money drainer. I would bet on the old raptor any day. But the SU57 over the raptor.
Jealousy based review
It could be a freaking good Jet if ruskies managed to build a bigger ship and a catapult sistem to overtake the load and weight limits imposed by sky jump. Soviets hated ti design NEW things and their Carrier were Just an upgrade of kiev class cruisers
Why design new things, when you can upgrade what you have for half the price. Also Russia is under heavy sanitation, so they can't mass product new things outta the sky.
@@subjectc7505 i'm not critizising the Jet, soviet aircraft Carrier wasnt more than a kiev class helicopter cruiser without some misiles removed from front section of the hull. But without catapult you Just cant launch heavily armed jets unless they are VSTOL capable. Skyjumps arent enough. Harriers take off because they're don't carry full payload or fuel, and besides they turn dowm their nozzles to assist take off.
Beautiful
Upcoming India's own carrier fighter aircraft craft TEDBF
Pretty plane
Very beautiful Fighter. If the U.S. were to Reimagine this beautiful Russian jets would be BadAss in my opinion.
Never happens. This is essentially F-16 generation. US already moved to stealth fighters like F-22 and F-35
@@antonzhdanov9653as much as 5th generation fighters are superior you cannot have an entire airforce , especially a force as Large as US to be filled with only 5th generation fighters … you always need capable 4th generation fighters to form the backbone until you have enough resources to replace them all
@@tanishdesai3884 So F-16 as knock-off cheap solution where this is sufficient. The definition F-16 perfectly fits.
@@tanishdesai3884 we have built 800 of the fuckers already and are making more
the flanker family was very successful, and flankers look good, overall better than the felons for their time
You get what you pay for
Failure for us army , can destroy ?😂
But she is handsome
Su 37 was also a failure.
Pretty sure it turned into the Su-30 or 35
before like the video make sure you see the comment 😂
This is only clickbait 😂
Your wrong it's not a failure, the euro fighter European is a failure
according to.... american
How about to make a video about f-35 failures??
Oh, wait... f-35 best fighter jet ever🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
👍
Propaganda video with many mistakes
🪖🫡🇷🇺
Syuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
the failure is not a design per se. its about economics and tech industry that cant delilver. thats it. no industrial hight tech capacity.
Liar
Pure western propaganda 😂😂
Opium Consumer 😮
China?
Lol eastern copium comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The problem the su33 faces is not an aircraft problem but a carrier problem as the admiral kuznetsov is a collosal failure as a power projecting ship. The airframe works well enough as the Chinese are able to use it in a competent fashion
Yep. The carrier just fucking sucks, the aircraft's normal.
Because the Chinese is competent and don't spend money on Yachts which could be turned into navy ships
you are talking crap