"if humanity solves some of its pressing problems and ventures into space to expand into the solar system, this may not be far off." is what kurzgesagt said at the beginning.
well it should be. But that is Tragically, Realistically Not going to happen that instantly. Worse still: All of these, being Unnecessarily on purpose too.
@@simpleviking dude like I am not trying to be mean but honestly how the hell did you think cows could live on a mars that had no plantlife yet? besides you said methane was co2 for some reason wich is just plain incorrect. also cows are really picky and need specific food and stuff like that. they would not survive there even with the plants we could grow on mars
The problem with "focusing on our home first" is that if an extinction event happens, we'll be wiped out, from asteroids, super nova's, or super Volcanos, there's also the problem of resources, we're running out of rare resources that the world needs, and all of those resources are abundant in space, especially in the asteroids that float around aimlessly, ignoring space is like ignoring an exit in a burning building
A second issue that's rarely brought up is that nearly all the methods for "fast" terraforming make the planet completely inhospitable in the short term. We CANNOT use them on Earth because it would KILL US. It's like if a house has termites. The fastest way to get rid of them is to bubble the house and gas it... but the people living there have to move out while it happens. Terraforming can be done on Earth, but it has to be slower and more delicately achieved within a system infinitely more complex than the lifeless surfaces of Mars, Venus, or some other planet.
@@jayzenstyle a lot of people want a quick and "easy" solution for self made problems, some would rather prefer we make it happen by any means and think about about possible outcomes afterwards (even knowing how bad it could be, they just don't want to care) [ "they" being primarily wealthy individuals with only self interests in mind as they always have ]
@@smileyface6583 I was just stating all humans alike can be dumb and usually don't have the ability to comprehend or forethought in regards of invisible/slow threats they themselves are causing
They got it backwards , they should fix / create the magnetic field first , THEN they should terraform the planet . They should also make it so that Mars itself produces the magnetic field . OR install a magnetic field generator inside Mars. Also the magnetic field should be just as strong as Earth's . Or close to it.
The main issue with moving to Mars is the low gravitational pull if we do get to Mars and send a colony there the pressing issue is the possibility of Martians (Earth Colony) may neve being able to come back to Earth because of Earth's higher gravitational pull. So colonists will have to be ready that they may never be able to come back home.
Well the narrator did say at the beginning, that once humanity fixed the current problems we are facing(like climate change) and managed to do cheaper space launching, this ain't far off. Because at this point of terraforming Mars, we probably already did the terraforming to our own Earth. After all, this wouldn't be a thing if it wasn't tried and tested to begin with.
I think we're going to send the first human to mars in around 25\30 years, while the process of terraforming I would say 2\3 centuries... if it happens. And let's say it happens, it would take soooo long, a couple of centuries i suppose. Also, imagine if we could live in both planets, such a cool thing. Loved the reaction, much love from Brasil S2!
I assume this won't reach our lifetimes, but terraforming testing on Earth is probably something already beginning. Especially the planned Line megastructure that Saudi Arabia is pulling off can give us some insight on how to do and not do terraforming.
Humans are not able to withstand Mars at night, it is freezing cold at night there, reaching -140°C, basically you would freeze without being inside a vehicle made to withstand those temperatures.
meanwhile in other of those examples like in Destiny official E3 gameplay experience trailer's portrayal. at its twenty seventh Second part. yes. see for that example. one powerful, existential example at that. Indeed.
"Itll be a home shaped by us and for us" realises all plants and animals are imported so technically its all designed by nature still. Score: God - infinity, Humans - 0
Hey from Germany. I just wanted to mention that the "Why don't we fix things on earth before moving into space" never really worked for me. Nothing new would ever be discovered that way. There will never be a situation when we say "Alright, every single problem here is solved, *now* we can go someplace else". I think it takes some of us the exist at the limits of our capabilities and knowledge... to expand those limits and maybe even discover new ways of solving problems back home, where most of us remain thinking about those problems.
the say it in a way it is easy to understand and entertain and on the context human had solved it's problems on earth however things like position the lasers, stabilise the biosphere, import nitrogen to Mars and many more have to be done using complicated and very difficult calculations over a span of many generations Don't be fooled by their optimistic way of explaining. it is very difficult ...well it's easy in a sense that if human as a species want to do it they can do. it just take a really long time to complete it
If you were worried that other nations have the ability to produce a weapon like this, if this was used on earth it would classify as a hypothetical doomsday weapon. I say hypothetical as terraforming Mars this was is a theory and the laser hasn't been made
12:21 - When will we be able to move to Mars? Landing on Mars' surface before 2023 ends .. is easily possible (if we really want to). But, by looking at our current commitments and ability to collaborate on space exploration, I'm almost sure the answer is ... NEVER
Nah it's not impossible it just be hard to do also this is a possibility project to make Mars habitable not something we cab do rn bro lmao we already are trying to fix climate change even if it's slow and even if we fix its gonna take decades for the CO2 levels in earth's atmosphere to drop
2:40 (answer for your question) every major breakthrough in science, technology, "everything" has something to do with Nasa and other space industries trying to solve problems in space or trying to get to space as they invent stuff the military buys it improves it corporations commercialise it and we benefit. So to change the earths atmosphere it is most efficient to start from 0 to figure out our best possible solutions to fix it so as we terraform a new planet new data gets sent to earth and a lot of scientists try to fix problems and others copy improve and fix our planet
plus a terrible idea trying to fix something you have never had trial and error on before like the only planet we live on better fvck mars and fix it before trying to fix earth and fail and killing us
I dont think we send humans to Mars that soon, since we could send robots to do the hard work first. Human like robots within 20 years, humans after 30 I think. Human settlers in maby 70-120 years.
"if humanity solves some of its pressing problems and ventures into space to expand into the solar system, this may not be far off." is what kurzgesagt said at the beginning.
well it should be.
But that is Tragically, Realistically Not going to happen that instantly.
Worse still: All of these, being Unnecessarily on purpose too.
14:55 pretty sure that someone in there watched the movie "The Core" 'Cause that's literally the plan in the movie to fix earth's core
What a delight!
Haha thank you! Hi :D
@@simpleviking react to geography now bulgaria pls
react to geography now bulgaria pls
react to geography now bulgaria pls
@@simpleviking dude like I am not trying to be mean but honestly how the hell did you think cows could live on a mars that had no plantlife yet? besides you said methane was co2 for some reason wich is just plain incorrect. also cows are really picky and need specific food and stuff like that. they would not survive there even with the plants we could grow on mars
The problem with "focusing on our home first" is that if an extinction event happens, we'll be wiped out, from asteroids, super nova's, or super Volcanos, there's also the problem of resources, we're running out of rare resources that the world needs, and all of those resources are abundant in space, especially in the asteroids that float around aimlessly, ignoring space is like ignoring an exit in a burning building
A second issue that's rarely brought up is that nearly all the methods for "fast" terraforming make the planet completely inhospitable in the short term. We CANNOT use them on Earth because it would KILL US. It's like if a house has termites. The fastest way to get rid of them is to bubble the house and gas it... but the people living there have to move out while it happens. Terraforming can be done on Earth, but it has to be slower and more delicately achieved within a system infinitely more complex than the lifeless surfaces of Mars, Venus, or some other planet.
Second comment! You gotta react to more Kurzgesagt videos man, they're all great.
Im on it :D
colonizing venus video of kurzgesagt i like more as i like venus more then mars xD
Awesome, more Kurzgesagt! ^_^
Yes!
@@simpleviking react to geography now bulgaria pls
react to geography now bulgaria pls
react to geography now bulgaria pls
2:29 this is a fallacy. The issue in this video is: terraforming mars and you provide another issue to counter Kurzgesagt
Yeah, jumpstarting the core of mars with a few nukes is definitely BS
Out of all things, why nukes? When Lasers are cleaner
@@jayzenstyle a lot of people want a quick and "easy" solution for self made problems, some would rather prefer we make it happen by any means and think about about possible outcomes afterwards (even knowing how bad it could be, they just don't want to care) [ "they" being primarily wealthy individuals with only self interests in mind as they always have ]
@@ex5080 no, this isn’t “humans”, it’s just dumbass billionaires who do dumb shit despite protests from their scientists and engineers.
@@smileyface6583 there, happy?
@@smileyface6583 I was just stating all humans alike can be dumb and usually don't have the ability to comprehend or forethought in regards of invisible/slow threats they themselves are causing
"At this point, we can slowly introduce more plant varieties, insects and animals. Not mosquitoes though!"
2:35 he said in the beginning “once we solve our more pressing problems”, he addressed your concern.
More Kurzgesagt please! :) I would recommend the Black Hole Size Comparison video!
keep doing this dude love it
They got it backwards , they should fix / create the magnetic field first , THEN they should terraform the planet . They should also make it so that Mars itself produces the magnetic field . OR install a magnetic field generator inside Mars. Also the magnetic field should be just as strong as Earth's . Or close to it.
The main issue with moving to Mars is the low gravitational pull if we do get to Mars and send a colony there the pressing issue is the possibility of Martians (Earth Colony) may neve being able to come back to Earth because of Earth's higher gravitational pull. So colonists will have to be ready that they may never be able to come back home.
Well the narrator did say at the beginning, that once humanity fixed the current problems we are facing(like climate change) and managed to do cheaper space launching, this ain't far off.
Because at this point of terraforming Mars, we probably already did the terraforming to our own Earth. After all, this wouldn't be a thing if it wasn't tried and tested to begin with.
Dig a hole on Mars and nuke the core 'till it restarts xD
A very American idea indeed.
I think we're going to send the first human to mars in around 25\30 years, while the process of terraforming I would say 2\3 centuries... if it happens. And let's say it happens, it would take soooo long, a couple of centuries i suppose. Also, imagine if we could live in both planets, such a cool thing. Loved the reaction, much love from Brasil S2!
Dude, there are literally billions of us. We can do more than one thing at a time.
I assume this won't reach our lifetimes, but terraforming testing on Earth is probably something already beginning. Especially the planned Line megastructure that Saudi Arabia is pulling off can give us some insight on how to do and not do terraforming.
A mass driver is basically a railgun
8:36 Yes bro, you had to watch that video, is marvelous
Im on it!
By the time we start terraforming Mars we wouldn’t even need fertile soil immediately, just use indoor farms
Can you react to how to terraform Venus
Yes sir!
Humans are not able to withstand Mars at night, it is freezing cold at night there, reaching -140°C, basically you would freeze without being inside a vehicle made to withstand those temperatures.
meanwhile in other of those examples like in Destiny official E3 gameplay experience trailer's portrayal. at its twenty seventh Second part.
yes. see for that example.
one powerful, existential example at that. Indeed.
10:41 how would a cow survive if there are no plants or grain to feed on?
"Itll be a home shaped by us and for us" realises all plants and animals are imported so technically its all designed by nature still. Score: God - infinity, Humans - 0
Hey from Germany. I just wanted to mention that the "Why don't we fix things on earth before moving into space" never really worked for me. Nothing new would ever be discovered that way. There will never be a situation when we say "Alright, every single problem here is solved, *now* we can go someplace else". I think it takes some of us the exist at the limits of our capabilities and knowledge... to expand those limits and maybe even discover new ways of solving problems back home, where most of us remain thinking about those problems.
the say it in a way it is easy to understand and entertain
and on the context human had solved it's problems on earth
however things like position the lasers, stabilise the biosphere, import nitrogen to Mars and many more have to be done using complicated and very difficult calculations over a span of many generations
Don't be fooled by their optimistic way of explaining. it is very difficult
...well it's easy in a sense that if human as a species want to do it they can do. it just take a really long time to complete it
If you were worried that other nations have the ability to produce a weapon like this, if this was used on earth it would classify as a hypothetical doomsday weapon. I say hypothetical as terraforming Mars this was is a theory and the laser hasn't been made
12:21 - When will we be able to move to Mars?
Landing on Mars' surface before 2023 ends .. is easily possible (if we really want to).
But, by looking at our current commitments and ability to collaborate on space exploration,
I'm almost sure the answer is ... NEVER
yo we need him to be the president or nasa ceo
Nah it's not impossible it just be hard to do also this is a possibility project to make Mars habitable not something we cab do rn bro lmao we already are trying to fix climate change even if it's slow and even if we fix its gonna take decades for the CO2 levels in earth's atmosphere to drop
2:40 (answer for your question) every major breakthrough in science, technology, "everything" has something to do with Nasa and other space industries trying to solve problems in space or trying to get to space as they invent stuff the military buys it improves it corporations commercialise it and we benefit. So to change the earths atmosphere it is most efficient to start from 0 to figure out our best possible solutions to fix it so as we terraform a new planet new data gets sent to earth and a lot of scientists try to fix problems and others copy improve and fix our planet
plus a terrible idea trying to fix something you have never had trial and error on before like the only planet we live on better fvck mars and fix it before trying to fix earth and fail and killing us
Can you react to casual geographic?
"HOW YA DOING"
almost first
I dont think we send humans to Mars that soon, since we could send robots to do the hard work first. Human like robots within 20 years, humans after 30 I think. Human settlers in maby 70-120 years.
Also man nuking the poles won't be enough man sorry bud we need to give it more CO2 in its atmosphere in order to make that happen etx
Im actually watching him for knowledge except it's not related to our topics 😭
humans work harder when life is in danger. s it's gonna work 100%
I mean not like adult whales.
Maybe just genetic material.
React to over simplified please.
2051
Mike is hot ❤❤
You didn't get the point of the video
Musk says a lot of stupid things 🤷♂️ Wonder how long it will take until he follows Ye