Disagree on test QA being taken over by this AI. It comes down to the whole QA process and developers / BA / Business Requirements and customer experience. Sure, there is a tool that can automatically pump out a test suite. How do you know the coverage is correct? Any developer who has read Business Requirement documents, etc. knows that there are many ways what is written can be interpreted, and even the requirements can be wrong. Meaning the system can be signed off and not meet the original requirements. Part of QA and auditing systems is to find these issues. And the amount of information needed / experience is something that an AI will not have. Will it help, sure. But, I see a lot of companies coming out with poor products if they pin their hopes on this. Plus, this AI is a massive security risk. Especially if it is going out on the internet to build it's "knowledge" - people can track what it is up to. So, if you have an idea you are looking to get to market would you trust using these AI applications to help with research? I think not. I see these as a tool that will find it's place in IT but like robots it will have set roles it does and does well and to a known quality. It will still take a highly skilled workforce to complete quality products at the end. As there are many parts of the process robots cannot do. Just ask Elon and Tesla when they thought they could automate everything - it was found it could not be done. And don't get me started on writing code - there are already a lot of products out there to help developers be more efficient (I remember days of VT420 screens) and using vi / sed to get stuff done. And have old guys tell me about punch cards / ticker tapes to run programs. I see AI as just another tool to help - and I have worked in AI / ML for years and know under the hood what goes on - not what a lot of people think it is.
Very useful insight and thank you for sharing these in depth insight. Ofc not all aspect of testing will be replaced and Cyber will be more important than ever given all these newer potential risk. Which will bring new teams that will focus on these. From my observation especially at big techs -> a lot of teams are already removing designated teams for pure testing/QA. These teams' responsibilities are allocated back to the developers or system level's team. So we will still have software engineers and teams building testing frameworks aka internal tools. Here for QA I am especially targeting manually testers/weekend testers. Or roles that they may be looking at your code and point out what the issues may be and what test you have to write. Elon and his team are still focused on reaching L4 self-driving :).
I also agree. If QA people can be replaced, why developers can't be replaced ? If QA process could be replaced by some algorithm, it would have happened already because tools for creating test cases are present for very long time. There is a big hype on ChatGPT, but this technology was present and employed by big tech companies for a long time. I remember that my company utilized AI for code reviews like 7 years ago. ChatGPT is exceptional because it reached the public, it was trained with far larger amount of random data. This is why it became so popular. Maybe at some point it will replace people but at the moment I think it lacks of creativity, it will struggle to solve problems which are new. And here is the main point. If there is some development happening, it is because someone wants to create something new or create a better solution for an old problem. This implies that new approach for implementation will happen and for testing as well. I agree, it will help a lot but not replace anyone, at least not very soon. I just have an impression people got crazy about ChatGPT because most of the people didn't know this technology is working. They were not aware that they have been reading articles created by AI, listening to music created by AI for many years. Today everybody talks about AI. You can hear about ChatGPT among people who are cooking, aquarium hobbyists, motorization hobbyists, layers, plumbers and so on :D There are parts for both processes which can be automated, but not all of it.
Nice insight. I believe it's hard for AI to completely replace a role in a field even for manual testing. At the end of the day humans will be the locus of responsibility, that means AI can do a stellar job as it likes, but still needs to be understood and signed off by humans, and when it goes wrong, as it always does, someone shall take responsibility for it. That being said, a practical point of view for people trying to make career decisions is that AI doesn't need to completely replace the job to stress you out, simply devaluing some of the current skills can cause enough stress, like before google days network people with good memory remembering thousands of commands had good advantages, but when googling became common the playing field was leveled.
What do you think about Cybersecurity? I’ve been considering getting into either Cyber, QA automation, or data science. Sounds like Cyber might be the safest route. Would you agree?
I dont understand why are everyone so hellbent on killing QA roles or SDET roles whenever new tools come out man .......if AI is sooooooooooooo fab why can't it replace UI/UX roles or content creating roles or even waiters yet ?....SDE's and companies might think that it's a piece of cake to handle development and QA including (automation) thru devs or even through AI ...... but it wont be that easy and companies will soon realise that it affects the Quality of their product as time passes
can we do a masters in data science after bachelors accounting finance minor in business data analytics or is business data analytics better idk what tf to study lmao
Thank you for watching Anthony. 100% I think cyber will be super important not just from a companies perspective. I think many new type of securities roles will also be created to detect AI related works
I work in IT for a bank and they are so risk averse they will never rely on ChatGPT or any fancy word predictor to make decision about their IT environment...
Still the risk is too high for banks. The risk of getting it wrong is hundreds of millions in fines and loss of banking licenses. Being an engineer for a regulated bank is probably one of the most secure jobs you can have about now especially if you’re a full stack or backend engineer.
Wrong. Software Developers are on the chopping block. I know this for a fact as I got some recent information indirectly. One of the big global consulting firms is investing a large amount just so they can drop 4,000 software engineers. This crap scares me. Its already happening.
True that basic QA roles will take an impact from AI. 💡If I was a QA engineer, I’d try to get into using AI or automation to build QA tools for job security
Disagree with the architect you can't expect devs will think to use Message brokers combining it to some other stuffs to solve a problem out of the blue
Thank you for watching. Impressed by your flexibility def do what you enjoy! In the near future having strong tech skills are still highly desirable. Let me know how I might be able to help I think many people are facing something similar
Cyber will be more critical for a lot of companies and can lead to more opportunities as well. Bad players will use AI and we will need to be ready for that. I know Gate also made a blog post about these ofc these are all assumptions and only time will tell
For right now - i think everyone needs to become familiar with AI and howto use it. As a DevOps Engineer - you are sitll going to need folks that can depoy models, ensure they are running, ensure that systems that power them are running properly etc. But nothing in the future is certain as AI gets more advanced - we will shift from writing code from the ground up - to simply validating the viability of the code a model presents. TLDR - become an AI Engineer, Data Scientist, ML Engineer etc.
@@funicon3689are not capable enough to develop a system to replace everyone, please do ..soon you will be out too ....gosh people are so ignorant...it will cause a chain reaction realise this
Master in SWE vs AI.. I think you would advocate the Master in AI and forget everything about Master in Data Sci/Business Ana because it's more technical and specialized?
Thank you for watching. I personally think master don’t offer enough scope in comparison to PhD but is def a nicer way to pivot into tech or learn more without being deeply committed into 6-7 years of PhD. I think SWE and AI both can be valuable depending on the program. Non technical roles like biz ana or data science is def higher risk and in the next few years assuming you just started master may already be very different
Thanks for watching. 100% more experience and the deeper knowledge regarding the stack the safer you might be. Sorry if this point wasn’t clear. I meant to convey that in the future more people will have the chance to be a project tech lead since AI can give you more superpower but it is up to that individual to use it effectively.
Honestly, 90% of what people call “ software engineering” is not needed. If the code you’re using can be found somewhere online, then your job is at risk. There will be a need for software engineers, but mostly for new technology and tools that are not documented and the ai will not know how to create
The need will be for not only integration, but also for training new specialised models. Even micro-models swarms. Then decreasing the costs, and security. This will be the next boom! If we take into account possible break-throught in space exploration, and AR/VR next years - we are good. People should stop doom-posting. It is hard, mostly because world economy and conflicts taking place now. Not because of AI. So far AI creating more jobs than taking.
God may bless you, thank you so much, the first video of ALL RUclips, that goes straight to which roles are at risk instead of saying "software is going to die" because it does not have sense to say that at a software platform as youtube xd
Hey Zeryus thank you for watching. At big tech based on my experience. There’s not a set role just for architect but most of these opportunities are for staff software engineers. Ofc if your team is new or 0->1 even less senior people gets some say into making these calls. For a lot of mid level to get to senior level they have to lead project and make these decisions
@@jonte7789 It's full stack for me. I tend to get more satisfaction from building something that ppl can use. I do find machine learning (particularly deep learning) to be pretty interesting but it's not something I plan to pursue career-wise but rather as a hobby
I don't know if I agree that AI can analyze data like statistics, to me to analyze data you have to think like a scientist to some degree and AI can't do that.
Would you still recommend someone to go to school for computer science? I’m thinking about switching my major to CS but just unsure about the tech field right now and it’s future.
There will be a tons of opportunities in the near future so I would say is still a great time to switch into CS. Especially if you are passionate about tech. Enjoying coding can be the tricky part
@@naturelife7536 the calculator replaced old styles of work with more efficiency, created more jobs… the computer replaced old styles of work with more efficiency, created more jobs… AI will replace old styles of work with more efficiency, create more jobs
Not tech related question but do you think the supply chain management industry will still be a good career field option in future with all the automation going on ?
Great Insight! In the AI era, which area do you think is better/promising? 1. SDE who builds service infra to generate model training data to feed AI. As we have more AI models, we may need model data infra to provide large scale high quality data. 2. SDE who works on full stack to build AIGC application. Fullstack development is in high demand in industry now, but it seems easy for Chatgpt to generate frontend code as well. Hope to hear your insights for these two career growth directions. Thanks Luca.
Thank you for watching Enting. Both are really good for 1. As AI model becomes better so will the demand for SDE who can build these tools. For 2. Full stack will always be valuable and more potential demand. For the two you mentioned I think 1 will be more specialized and harder to get into without the right background but for 2. It will be equally exciting and a lot easier to get started
100% could be at a higher risk. While I do think is at risk but I think data analyst is the level 1 for a lot of these data roles so I don’t think it will be fully eliminated. The role will def be functioned differently and the role may now require less people to do more since more tools will become available.
I think you are on to something about the Data Scientist role. The role isn't clearly defined, every company defines the role differently. There has been on occasion RUclipsrs who are Data Scientist professionals claim to perform similar task to what a Machine Learning Engineer would perform, yet they don't have heavy SQL skills. So where do they gather their data from? Also, aren''t the roles completely different from one another? Maybe you could clear up some of these points? But I could be wrong but it seems the role won't last long especially now with this recession.
Thank you for watching Bryan. I know a lot of people are already asking GPT4 to create simple MMO games. I wonder what the creative elements will be like? I know we already been seeing for example text to image creation (DALL-E). Would def be interested to see more I think huge implication to metaverse as well
@Tech with Luca I'm sure there'd be less coding mistakes and less opportunities for hacking if a strong AI was developed to make games. I think it'll be awhile before a game that's in depth like Ashes of Creation or Mortal Online 2 can be made by an AI.
Entry-level developers will be at risk. For most of my assignments at school, I tried using ChatGPT and it was able to guide me, I just fixed a few things, that were scary, we must know that ChatGPT in 10 years, will improve, and it will be able to do more tasks. So yeah, entry-level jobs in certain fields in technology will be affected at least by 45 to 50%.
The bottom line is this, we live in a highly capitalistic society (in the US at least). The US economy cannot afford millions of working-age, formally high-earning, educated Americans being out of work. The economy would completely collapse. If all things remain equal with how this country operates, AI will only displace a small number of jobs, and become a valued assistant to most others.
I don't have much hope and I really hope I'm wrong here. Just because we have a problem doesn't mean it will limit and control itself. Maybe, millions of formally high-earning, educated Americans will be out of work for good. The US goverment doesn't seem capable of being able to manage the erosion of the middle class to begin with. The wealth inequality just keeps getting worse for decades. We also have cost of living inflation, stagnant wages, student loan, and housing affordability crises that seems to keep getting worse. These problems are not just in the US, but in other developed countries too. Maybe we might start to have public housing and universal basic income since so many upper middle class jobs are gone in the future along with the middle class jobs already gone. However, given the track record, I think our society we know today is simply going to cease to exist. It's really sad to think like this.
Exactly if everything and everyone will be replaced it will cause the economy to collapse and cause chain reaction...and I don't think that will be allowed to happen...rest let's see what happens
Tech/Software architects is the hardest to substitute, i think. Some one have to make the decisions based of subjective reasoning, and there is need of some one the be responsible. IA can't have the responsibility.
Yes. I talked about the triumphal return to communism or likely an imperfect communism, where capitalism and communism might co-exist with a reduced gap. We better face it now, cause the new generation to come of that kind of software might wipe out, if not all, most jobs, reducing human intervention to almost 1% or so.
Thanks for watching nika, I recently made a video on the top roles. I think FE dev is going to be fine in the short term and it will still be extremely important
I expect AI will spawn more jobs, not fewer. Yes there will be change, but that was always the case. I was a master at VBScript, an obsolete skill now. Did I go on unemployment? No, I re-tooled, same as the rest of you will do. The alternative is stagnancy, or something even worse like out of Anthem.
hi Luca, recently i have completed Automation Testing course then currently i am job searching in QA Automation Test Engineer. but not getting any calls. i dont know this situation how can i handle. please suggest any options
Disagree on each second I watch; programming side of data science job will go first. Programming is the most repetitive and easiest job. You need logic, and models but programs software can write easily.
Tge safest seems to be job in physical datacenter. Someone must walk with these cables 😂 I guess system maintenance with high level of understanding of processes (sysadmin, network engineer) are safe. Devops with usage of autokation tools such as ansible and terraform. AI can do it but still there must be its architect eho understands what and how must be automated. In general I think infrastrucutre/operations will be safe. Programmers job will become super boring. No creativity, just fixing code written by AI. Kind of QA with programming language. Certainly OS developers, all these people from programming kernel and so on are safe, thats extremely hard job though, requiring big knowledge, high level math understanding. Similar with REAL cybersecurity. It's high level networking, sysadmin, understanding cryptography (math) plus programming if it comes to sexurity on application level. So I would say original core of IT is safe.
Thank you for watching! I have another video on this topic make sure to check it out :D. TLDR I think full stack will be well positioned for the near future
If AI democratizes, more SAAS companies like, sap, salesforce, spacex can be built at a fraction of cost, so mor global gdp boost, cause government cant stop investing capital to stop inflation, US did a mistake, which trump will change, more gdp, more skilled jobs, I would say more jobs than before, cause most industries in future will have regulations and therefore, human oversight, so more companies, more jobs, its the transition that sucks
Disagree with tech-lead. Critical job, and won't go easily in the next decade. Why? Who would like to take the full responsibility for the process? You have tech-lead at least to blame.
😂😂😂😂 ok this is whole wrong do you work 1 day IT industry. All the roles you mentioned in video it will not be extinct for over 20 years. Everyone who works in industry should have adaptability and learn quick new knowledge. When you stop becoming obsolete.
Disagree on test QA being taken over by this AI. It comes down to the whole QA process and developers / BA / Business Requirements and customer experience. Sure, there is a tool that can automatically pump out a test suite. How do you know the coverage is correct? Any developer who has read Business Requirement documents, etc. knows that there are many ways what is written can be interpreted, and even the requirements can be wrong. Meaning the system can be signed off and not meet the original requirements. Part of QA and auditing systems is to find these issues. And the amount of information needed / experience is something that an AI will not have. Will it help, sure. But, I see a lot of companies coming out with poor products if they pin their hopes on this.
Plus, this AI is a massive security risk. Especially if it is going out on the internet to build it's "knowledge" - people can track what it is up to. So, if you have an idea you are looking to get to market would you trust using these AI applications to help with research? I think not.
I see these as a tool that will find it's place in IT but like robots it will have set roles it does and does well and to a known quality. It will still take a highly skilled workforce to complete quality products at the end. As there are many parts of the process robots cannot do. Just ask Elon and Tesla when they thought they could automate everything - it was found it could not be done.
And don't get me started on writing code - there are already a lot of products out there to help developers be more efficient (I remember days of VT420 screens) and using vi / sed to get stuff done. And have old guys tell me about punch cards / ticker tapes to run programs. I see AI as just another tool to help - and I have worked in AI / ML for years and know under the hood what goes on - not what a lot of people think it is.
Very useful insight and thank you for sharing these in depth insight. Ofc not all aspect of testing will be replaced and Cyber will be more important than ever given all these newer potential risk. Which will bring new teams that will focus on these.
From my observation especially at big techs -> a lot of teams are already removing designated teams for pure testing/QA. These teams' responsibilities are allocated back to the developers or system level's team. So we will still have software engineers and teams building testing frameworks aka internal tools. Here for QA I am especially targeting manually testers/weekend testers. Or roles that they may be looking at your code and point out what the issues may be and what test you have to write.
Elon and his team are still focused on reaching L4 self-driving :).
I also agree. If QA people can be replaced, why developers can't be replaced ? If QA process could be replaced by some algorithm, it would have happened already because tools for creating test cases are present for very long time. There is a big hype on ChatGPT, but this technology was present and employed by big tech companies for a long time. I remember that my company utilized AI for code reviews like 7 years ago. ChatGPT is exceptional because it reached the public, it was trained with far larger amount of random data. This is why it became so popular.
Maybe at some point it will replace people but at the moment I think it lacks of creativity, it will struggle to solve problems which are new. And here is the main point. If there is some development happening, it is because someone wants to create something new or create a better solution for an old problem. This implies that new approach for implementation will happen and for testing as well. I agree, it will help a lot but not replace anyone, at least not very soon. I just have an impression people got crazy about ChatGPT because most of the people didn't know this technology is working. They were not aware that they have been reading articles created by AI, listening to music created by AI for many years. Today everybody talks about AI. You can hear about ChatGPT among people who are cooking, aquarium hobbyists, motorization hobbyists, layers, plumbers and so on :D
There are parts for both processes which can be automated, but not all of it.
Nice insight. I believe it's hard for AI to completely replace a role in a field even for manual testing. At the end of the day humans will be the locus of responsibility, that means AI can do a stellar job as it likes, but still needs to be understood and signed off by humans, and when it goes wrong, as it always does, someone shall take responsibility for it.
That being said, a practical point of view for people trying to make career decisions is that AI doesn't need to completely replace the job to stress you out, simply devaluing some of the current skills can cause enough stress, like before google days network people with good memory remembering thousands of commands had good advantages, but when googling became common the playing field was leveled.
What do you think about Cybersecurity? I’ve been considering getting into either Cyber, QA automation, or data science. Sounds like Cyber might be the safest route. Would you agree?
I dont understand why are everyone so hellbent on killing QA roles or SDET roles whenever new tools come out man .......if AI is sooooooooooooo fab why can't it replace UI/UX roles or content creating roles or even waiters yet ?....SDE's and companies might think that it's a piece of cake to handle development and QA including (automation) thru devs or even through AI ...... but it wont be that easy and companies will soon realise that it affects the Quality of their product as time passes
1. Test engineer
2. Data Analyst
3. Tech Architect
4. Cloud Engineer
5. Internal tool developer
What did I miss?
can we do a masters in data science after
bachelors accounting finance minor in business data analytics
or is business data analytics better
idk what tf to study lmao
Shit.
I am doing 2.
Program Mgr
No way! Cloud and DevOps jobs are here to stay.
A lot of jobs being automated and they are at high risk of getting hacked, Cybersecurity might become a high demand field.
Thank you for watching Anthony. 100% I think cyber will be super important not just from a companies perspective. I think many new type of securities roles will also be created to detect AI related works
Hey I’m 15 and I really like computers do you think I should get into cybersecurity or that is that a risk of getting my job taken later?
@@suckmytoes8396 demand will be more
I am agree
I am Groot
What do you think about cybersecurity and its future?
I work in IT for a bank and they are so risk averse they will never rely on ChatGPT or any fancy word predictor to make decision about their IT environment...
It’s not fancy word generator read try
Still the risk is too high for banks. The risk of getting it wrong is hundreds of millions in fines and loss of banking licenses. Being an engineer for a regulated bank is probably one of the most secure jobs you can have about now especially if you’re a full stack or backend engineer.
That second one you mentioned of data analysis, I follow a Twitch streamer that worked in one such role, their entire department got closed due to AI.
As a data analyst it is hard to kill data analyst for ai
To be honest, this field is the easiest to replace.
Wrong. Software Developers are on the chopping block. I know this for a fact as I got some recent information indirectly. One of the big global consulting firms is investing a large amount just so they can drop 4,000 software engineers. This crap scares me. Its already happening.
One big company in the US doesnt equal every other company in other parts of the world. Facepalm.
Please provide us an update. How many of 4,000 software engineers have been dropped? How's this situation progressing?
update please
@@lynic-0091it isn’t one big company, it is becoming a trend that AI will replace software engineering
Agreed.
Hey Luca .....what do you think about the future prospects of DevOps ???
True that basic QA roles will take an impact from AI. 💡If I was a QA engineer, I’d try to get into using AI or automation to build QA tools for job security
Before something can be truly replace first we must have the tools and building those tools are the new opportunities. Well said
That’s exactly it! Thanks for the echo and the great video :)
Disagree with the architect you can't expect devs will think to use Message brokers combining it to some other stuffs to solve a problem out of the blue
Scary future, but we will have to adapt. I'm still deciding what I want to do and because of AI I'm constantly changing.
Thank you for watching. Impressed by your flexibility def do what you enjoy! In the near future having strong tech skills are still highly desirable. Let me know how I might be able to help I think many people are facing something similar
@@TechwithLuca Thanks! I appreciate that!
@@TechwithLuca please can I learn Cyber security or Software engineer/ developer
@@rufaiwaheed No, you're not allowed to do that!
The dependency on this technology alone is a bad idea, you take a huge risk to do that just to make development cheaper? Good luck
I thinm software development in general will be killed off alt least 50 percent , imnot even sure about help dest and cyber security 😅
Cyber will be more critical for a lot of companies and can lead to more opportunities as well. Bad players will use AI and we will need to be ready for that. I know Gate also made a blog post about these ofc these are all assumptions and only time will tell
Great insights Luca! Love the recent videos lately on OpenAI 😄
Thank you for watching Sandra
For right now - i think everyone needs to become familiar with AI and howto use it. As a DevOps Engineer - you are sitll going to need folks that can depoy models, ensure they are running, ensure that systems that power them are running properly etc. But nothing in the future is certain as AI gets more advanced - we will shift from writing code from the ground up - to simply validating the viability of the code a model presents. TLDR - become an AI Engineer, Data Scientist, ML Engineer etc.
QA won't be affected at all. It requires careful thinking on what to test and how. "AI" is not capable of thinking at all.
LOL
im currently implementing systems that replace entire QA teams
@@funicon3689 good luck with that
@@funicon3689are not capable enough to develop a system to replace everyone, please do ..soon you will be out too ....gosh people are so ignorant...it will cause a chain reaction realise this
@funicon3689 what system are you working
Master in SWE vs AI.. I think you would advocate the Master in AI and forget everything about Master in Data Sci/Business Ana because it's more technical and specialized?
Thank you for watching. I personally think master don’t offer enough scope in comparison to PhD but is def a nicer way to pivot into tech or learn more without being deeply committed into 6-7 years of PhD. I think SWE and AI both can be valuable depending on the program. Non technical roles like biz ana or data science is def higher risk and in the next few years assuming you just started master may already be very different
Sorry, but if AI can replace a tech lead', it can replace the whole team. The grunt work will be the first to go.
Thanks for watching. 100% more experience and the deeper knowledge regarding the stack the safer you might be. Sorry if this point wasn’t clear. I meant to convey that in the future more people will have the chance to be a project tech lead since AI can give you more superpower but it is up to that individual to use it effectively.
Not necessarily, there are some weird edge cases AI gets stuck on that are simple or tedious. You’ll need 1 grunter instead of 1000.
what about embedded firmware and linux drivers engineers, will they also be replaced by AI in next 10 years
Honestly, 90% of what people call “ software engineering” is not needed. If the code you’re using can be found somewhere online, then your job is at risk.
There will be a need for software engineers, but mostly for new technology and tools that are not documented and the ai will not know how to create
The need will be for not only integration, but also for training new specialised models. Even micro-models swarms. Then decreasing the costs, and security. This will be the next boom! If we take into account possible break-throught in space exploration, and AR/VR next years - we are good. People should stop doom-posting. It is hard, mostly because world economy and conflicts taking place now. Not because of AI. So far AI creating more jobs than taking.
Best comment
@HCforLife1 Yeah, how rich people can sell there products or Software if there is no job
God may bless you, thank you so much, the first video of ALL RUclips, that goes straight to which roles are at risk instead of saying "software is going to die" because it does not have sense to say that at a software platform as youtube xd
What do you think about the software architect? Is there such a role in a big tech company like Google and will it be affected by AI?
Hey Zeryus thank you for watching. At big tech based on my experience. There’s not a set role just for architect but most of these opportunities are for staff software engineers. Ofc if your team is new or 0->1 even less senior people gets some say into making these calls. For a lot of mid level to get to senior level they have to lead project and make these decisions
i see you on the data janitor channel, we might have similar interests, what job/role are you thinking of pursuing?
@@jonte7789 It's full stack for me. I tend to get more satisfaction from building something that ppl can use. I do find machine learning (particularly deep learning) to be pretty interesting but it's not something I plan to pursue career-wise but rather as a hobby
I don't know if I agree that AI can analyze data like statistics, to me to analyze data you have to think like a scientist to some degree and AI can't do that.
Would you still recommend someone to go to school for computer science? I’m thinking about switching my major to CS but just unsure about the tech field right now and it’s future.
There will be a tons of opportunities in the near future so I would say is still a great time to switch into CS. Especially if you are passionate about tech. Enjoying coding can be the tricky part
@@TechwithLuca can i know why you say there will be more opportunities in the future?
@@naturelife7536 the calculator replaced old styles of work with more efficiency, created more jobs… the computer replaced old styles of work with more efficiency, created more jobs… AI will replace old styles of work with more efficiency, create more jobs
CS is overrated and over saturated. We don’t need more software engineers when there’s already an abundance in the market.
Not tech related question but do you think the supply chain management industry will still be a good career field option in future with all the automation going on ?
Great Insight! In the AI era, which area do you think is better/promising? 1. SDE who builds service infra to generate model training data to feed AI. As we have more AI models, we may need model data infra to provide large scale high quality data. 2. SDE who works on full stack to build AIGC application. Fullstack development is in high demand in industry now, but it seems easy for Chatgpt to generate frontend code as well. Hope to hear your insights for these two career growth directions. Thanks Luca.
Thank you for watching Enting. Both are really good for 1. As AI model becomes better so will the demand for SDE who can build these tools. For 2. Full stack will always be valuable and more potential demand. For the two you mentioned I think 1 will be more specialized and harder to get into without the right background but for 2. It will be equally exciting and a lot easier to get started
What about cloud or devops engineer?
on your way out
I don’t think so, cloud will be prominent
@@abhigujjar7439he already said in this video that cloud engineers will be replaced by AI
I disagree about anything to do with data and cloud, even at the entry level!
So what fields are unsaturated or have more sustainability
I think organic fields but not an expert in agriculture.
Data analyst also at risk ? what do u think ?
100% could be at a higher risk. While I do think is at risk but I think data analyst is the level 1 for a lot of these data roles so I don’t think it will be fully eliminated. The role will def be functioned differently and the role may now require less people to do more since more tools will become available.
every job every where will eventually be at risk
I think you are on to something about the Data Scientist role. The role isn't clearly defined, every company defines the role differently. There has been on occasion RUclipsrs who are Data Scientist professionals claim to perform similar task to what a Machine Learning Engineer would perform, yet they don't have heavy SQL skills. So where do they gather their data from? Also, aren''t the roles completely different from one another? Maybe you could clear up some of these points? But I could be wrong but it seems the role won't last long especially now with this recession.
Thank you for watching. Indeed a lot of the times job title doesn't actually reflect what you are tasked with.
As a statistician, I laugh with these buzz titles such as "data scientist" and "machine learning engineer".
High Demand for Data Engineers role compare than data scientist & Analyst role
I'm curious how long before you thought AI would be possible to replace people doing coding for higher quality games in the MMORPG category.🤔
Thank you for watching Bryan. I know a lot of people are already asking GPT4 to create simple MMO games. I wonder what the creative elements will be like? I know we already been seeing for example text to image creation (DALL-E). Would def be interested to see more I think huge implication to metaverse as well
@Tech with Luca I'm sure there'd be less coding mistakes and less opportunities for hacking if a strong AI was developed to make games. I think it'll be awhile before a game that's in depth like Ashes of Creation or Mortal Online 2 can be made by an AI.
The AI is already starting to replace people.. maybe in 5 years less coder needed.
What about DevOps??
What about data engineers? Basically they seem to write software to clean up data so the ML engineer can use it.
Entry-level developers will be at risk. For most of my assignments at school, I tried using ChatGPT and it was able to guide me, I just fixed a few things, that were scary, we must know that ChatGPT in 10 years, will improve, and it will be able to do more tasks. So yeah, entry-level jobs in certain fields in technology will be affected at least by 45 to 50%.
The bottom line is this, we live in a highly capitalistic society (in the US at least). The US economy cannot afford millions of working-age, formally high-earning, educated Americans being out of work. The economy would completely collapse. If all things remain equal with how this country operates, AI will only displace a small number of jobs, and become a valued assistant to most others.
I don't have much hope and I really hope I'm wrong here. Just because we have a problem doesn't mean it will limit and control itself. Maybe, millions of formally high-earning, educated Americans will be out of work for good. The US goverment doesn't seem capable of being able to manage the erosion of the middle class to begin with. The wealth inequality just keeps getting worse for decades. We also have cost of living inflation, stagnant wages, student loan, and housing affordability crises that seems to keep getting worse. These problems are not just in the US, but in other developed countries too. Maybe we might start to have public housing and universal basic income since so many upper middle class jobs are gone in the future along with the middle class jobs already gone. However, given the track record, I think our society we know today is simply going to cease to exist. It's really sad to think like this.
Exactly if everything and everyone will be replaced it will cause the economy to collapse and cause chain reaction...and I don't think that will be allowed to happen...rest let's see what happens
Tech/Software architects is the hardest to substitute, i think.
Some one have to make the decisions based of subjective reasoning, and there is need of some one the be responsible. IA can't have the responsibility.
I think Elon Musk talked about "Universal Income" a while ago.
Now it looks like it makes sense. 😎
Yes. I talked about the triumphal return to communism or likely an imperfect communism, where capitalism and communism might co-exist with a reduced gap. We better face it now, cause the new generation to come of that kind of software might wipe out, if not all, most jobs, reducing human intervention to almost 1% or so.
I believe even development roles will be impacted, pretty much every role will be
What about app devekoper?
what is your view of website administrator job is it in risk ?
it is at risk with or without AI
What about automation testing engineering ? Please someone reply…
50% of position cut, but in my opinion no One job Will disappear, just the staff team Will be reduced.
What do you think on front end developer ? (Html,css,js react)
Thanks for watching nika, I recently made a video on the top roles. I think FE dev is going to be fine in the short term and it will still be extremely important
I expect AI will spawn more jobs, not fewer. Yes there will be change, but that was always the case. I was a master at VBScript, an obsolete skill now. Did I go on unemployment? No, I re-tooled, same as the rest of you will do. The alternative is stagnancy, or something even worse like out of Anthem.
im glad to help people like you but please keep your hands a little bit calmer
thank you Luca for sharing this. I am mostly agree with you, good predictions
Thank you for watching Emin
hi Luca, recently i have completed Automation Testing course then currently i am job searching in QA Automation Test Engineer. but not getting any calls. i dont know this situation how can i handle. please suggest any options
Bro what about data engineering
Looks like it's time to become a Plumber or HVAC tech
Disagree on each second I watch; programming side of data science job will go first. Programming is the most repetitive and easiest job. You need logic, and models but programs software can write easily.
As a New CS student, your videos are amazing!! Great work.
Thank you Jordan. Good luck with your study!
Tge safest seems to be job in physical datacenter. Someone must walk with these cables 😂 I guess system maintenance with high level of understanding of processes (sysadmin, network engineer) are safe. Devops with usage of autokation tools such as ansible and terraform. AI can do it but still there must be its architect eho understands what and how must be automated. In general I think infrastrucutre/operations will be safe. Programmers job will become super boring. No creativity, just fixing code written by AI. Kind of QA with programming language. Certainly OS developers, all these people from programming kernel and so on are safe, thats extremely hard job though, requiring big knowledge, high level math understanding. Similar with REAL cybersecurity. It's high level networking, sysadmin, understanding cryptography (math) plus programming if it comes to sexurity on application level. So I would say original core of IT is safe.
AI will NEVER put a bug in code. . .whoa
What you think about the web developer or full stack developer
Thank you for watching! I have another video on this topic make sure to check it out :D. TLDR I think full stack will be well positioned for the near future
If AI democratizes, more SAAS companies like, sap, salesforce, spacex can be built at a fraction of cost, so mor global gdp boost, cause government cant stop investing capital to stop inflation, US did a mistake, which trump will change, more gdp, more skilled jobs, I would say more jobs than before, cause most industries in future will have regulations and therefore, human oversight, so more companies, more jobs, its the transition that sucks
hell nah, to the cloud. My company would rather burn to the ground that to give AI access to the cloud services we use (AWS and Kubernetes)
data engineer roles is high risk ?
Only the ones that is more on the business side the no code data engineer
I found it hard to follow your video because you kept on cutting the video too quickly. Please don't do that!
Cobol is still inused
Good stuff
Why do people move their hands so much in RUclips videos? It always seems so exaggerated. It’s very distracting. Especially at 1.5x
Thanks Luca
AI security would boom I guess
I don't want to be jobless due to AI
Luca great video but you are moving your hands excessively
Please don't use your hands too much
….you talk a lot with your hands. It was a little distracting seeing them come in and out of frame
Thank you for watching! Noted.Hopefully this tells I am not AI generated :D.
Maybe it's just you overly sensitive.
I think because You are bad communicator
Disagree with tech-lead. Critical job, and won't go easily in the next decade. Why? Who would like to take the full responsibility for the process? You have tech-lead at least to blame.
😂😂😂😂 ok this is whole wrong do you work 1 day IT industry. All the roles you mentioned in video it will not be extinct for over 20 years. Everyone who works in industry should have adaptability and learn quick new knowledge. When you stop becoming obsolete.
Always trust tech advice from a guy wearing Patagonia.😄
Lmao thank you for watching!
Tech writers, you're on your way out. Learn a trade instead.
A lot of news documents nowadays may also be generated partially by AI
@@TechwithLuca Good point! Writers in general are going to have a hard time finding work now.
STOP AI
Software developers programmed themselves out of jobs. Ouch.