Hi kids! I am a software developer since 90's, and I've heard this statement multiple times during my career. The first time I heard it was back in the 90's when Java was invented. The statement back then was that since you could write object oriented code, then coding was so easy that every human on the planet could do it, and no software developers was no longer needed in the future.. However it turned out the opposite all the times in the past. Maybe it will be different now that Generative AI is available? Well... My observations during the last year has shows the complete opposite once again. As a software developer I have never before seen such increase in demand for my skills and services from my customers. I need to turn down 90% of all projects that need my help to bring AI tools and software to their businesses. Sadly all my colleagues face the same problem. We need more software developers to be able to meet this enormous increase in demand. So if you ask me if becoming a software developer is useless nowadays, I will say definitely not! Come and work with me! :) Wish you the best!! P.S. My english is bad, I know. I am from Sweden.
Your English is brilliant and thank you so much for sharing your experience! We too, see a huge demand, and the need to upskill more people, maybe not with deep deep coding knowledge, but with tools and skills to leverage AI in software development and acceleration. Would love to learn more about your business!
@@godago Hello! 👋 Yes I also see a big increase in projects where businesses want to leverage these new AI tools to become more effective and profitable. Right now mostly tech-companies but also small increase within public sector. I think more and more organizations will discover the use of AI in combination with their own data. We developers are already loving these tools for helping us code, and it makes us more efficient also, which is a win-win! (AI tech will bring us more job + make us more efficient 😀) Now of course there are some jobs that are in danger of complete take over by AI-tools, and that is not good. But I dont think that software developers is in that category at all. I would guess the jobs in danger are like ship, train, truck drivers, helpdesk people answering phone and emails, and so on.. (Jobs that has no eye to eye human interaction and can be fully automated). My own business is a small consultant company with only software developers helping both private and public sector with web services and recently custom AI stuff, like building agents that are customer data aware. All the best regards!
Go for theoretical computer sciences….syntax are open to change but semantics remain the same….now a days programming semantics are not only build on logic,there is a lot more applied maths behind it coz of ai
Too many programmers learning dumb languages like JavaScript or whatever. People should learn "hardware"!!! Our robotics is very bad today, because we build our robots by hand, they should instead be built from legos that are assembled by robots, and those assembly robots are themselves assembled by other robots. We should work with very tiny robots(like the size of flee) so that we can build millions of them and we can test the robots by jumping from robot to robot being controlled remotely instead of what we have now. Not only robots we should also program how to make things, you make things by giving your robot swarm instructions and some raw ingredient. The other hardware that is important is brain-body-computer interfaces.
@@nadeemshaikh7863 by learning, logic and philosophy of computer sciences,you wouldn’t be limited to a tech stack which is bound to loose demands coz of excess supply….there is always a trade off between the hype train and saturated demands….be it cloud computing,virtualization ,coding and other changing computing technologies,the bases which you study in your undergraduate like os,data structure blah blah will always remain useful in the era of changing tech….ai is a different story coz it also has a lot to do with statistics and maths
I understand Jensen's point. He suggests that in the near future, AI may enable anyone to create software effortlessly, akin to playing tic-tac-toe. However, for highly intricate software, a single prompt may not suffice. You'll need to provide AI with detailed instructions regarding workflows, procedures, processes, and more. This necessitates expertise in your chosen field to effectively communicate with AI and ensure the development of the desired software.
You rely on the (IMO) very delusional idea that the development is years away from the phase when the AI will perfectly understand what a client is asking using his plain+clumsy language. Even if/when the AI gets it wrong the first time (let's assume you would get it right) and delivers something the client did not want, it will take a fraction of a second to produce a new iteration of the software. It will be _crushingly_ faster+cheaper to go through tens of development iterations with the AI than to produce a detailed order + documentation for you, the developer. Sorry bro. I hope I am wrong, of course.
At some point AI will be able to train itself on data containing your personality and your interests. We won't need to be proficient in any field, it will just understand us when we make requests because the AI will essentially be a digital copy of the user. The fact that some AI models are already training other AI models right now proves this to be the case very soon. The only direction AI development can go is forward because eventually there will be absolutely _zero_ human input required. There would be no point in requiring human input for AI tasks if AI itself exceeds peak human intelligence.
The rich are money-minded; that's a lesson I've grasped from the very beginning. My desire to build wealth has always been strong. I’ve set aside $160K since 2020, and while fancy cars are tempting, I’m eager to invest it in the stock market to grow my financial future. I’d love to hear any recommendations you have.
I suggest consulting with an experienced financial professional. It might seem pricey, but as the saying goes, "you get what you pay for." My belief is that "Expert solutions require expert providers."
Even if you’re not skilled, it is still possible to hire one. I was a project manager and my personal portfolio of approximately $850k of my retirement pension took a big hit in April due to the crash. I quickly got in touch with a financial-planner that devised a defensive strategy to protect my funds and make profit from my portfolio this red season. I’ve made over $250k since then.
I've worked in real estate for over 25 years and have neglected a major stock portfolio. This served me well when I was flipping and renting houses, however I need a different plan now.. mind if I look up the professional guiding you please?
Sure you can! Teresa L Athas is the financial advisor I work with. Just search the name. You’ll find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.
Thanks for sharing. i searched her full name and found her web instantly. After reviewing her credentials and conducting due diligence, i reached out to her.
I believe that investors should always use their money for investments, especially We'll start to see greater market diversification in 2024. About $350,000 of my funds are intended to be invested in equities over the upcoming year. Goal of becoming millionaire by 2024
Now that the risk is at an all-time high, maybe you should exercise a bit more patience and come back when the risk has subsided. As an alternative, you can get strategic advice from a qualified financial specialist.
It's true that I've communicated with a brokerage advisor. My adviser selects the entry and exit commands for my portfolio, which has grown to over $550k, from an original starting reserve of $80k.
"My fiduciary is Melissa Jean Taligdan, who is licenced." Just look up the name. In order to schedule an appointment, you would find the information you need in a letter.
Never take a CEO's word at face value. There is always an ulterior motive behind the things they say. It's not necessarily intentionally sinister, but the reality is that it's in their best interest to guide the masses (that's you and me) toward the kind of things that benefit them and their companies. I have nothing against individual CEOs personally, but they are the public-facing corporate voice of their companies. Even if a CEO made an absolutely factual statement, such as "the sun is hot," I would still have doubts about their motives. That's not to say that it is useless to pay attention to what they say, because we can gauge their intent by the character of their message. However, do not base your entire professional career around their suggestions. As long as computers exist, there will always be a need for software developers building the foundation. I am not a software engineer, I just want to encourage people to think for themselves. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.
Learn learn, learn upskill, upskill upskill while the standard of living of middle-class goes down down down and down this world of high technology looks more and more like hell. I don’t wanna learn all the time I want to relax and enjoy life ffs
@@adeobama9ja Welcome to asian school curriculum. the competition of who knows first or who learns about the latest development is driving us to oblivion. studying is all we do now.
I do not "code". I develop Software and have been doing it for 30+ years. I asked ChatGPT to design a QuadTree in C++ that has a user defined interface to set the node levels, add and delete nodes from the root down to the specified level and render the entire thing in OpenGL. NOT. It failed hard. Then I asked if it to write C++ to implement a moving average FFT filter. NOT. I do not see ChatGPT or AI replacing Software Engineers anytime soon, if at all.
just imagine if there was a model that could fulfill all these requests. something like that will probably emerge in the coming years. and the ramifications for us developers will be gigantic.
Do you have any idea about the capabilities of the ChatGPT version you were using? It sounds like you are trying to put a size 12 foot in a size 6 shoe. You would need to be an advanced prompt engineer to do the task you are describing if you could do it at all in the tool you were using. You need to ask yourself whether you have the need, ability, or desire to learn this skill. I'm seventy-eight years old. I'm blessed by luck with still being able to do this work. Millions of good people will not be. I've had to learn not to persecute these people by trying to train them. Those who use these tools will have to learn and relearn constantly. The tools of 2024 are hundreds of times more powerful than those of 2023. It will be that way for several years.
You are in a good position to stay right where you are at. New grads are in a tough spot though. With a massive financial incentive to automate expensive technical work, I think its at least plasuible that within 20 years many of these programming jobs go away. What are those ~40 year olds going to do? They still have about 25 years until retirement if they are an average joe
If you are a real software engineer (a gentle dig...) you'd NEVER define a set of requirements in such a vague and loose way. Would you hand this task over to a junior engineer? No (well, I hope not). To get the real benefit out of AI when it comes to software you already have to be able to think about the whole system and be able to understand how to divide up the overall functionality into well-defined chunks. If you can do that then AI will massively help you. If you can't then it won't.
Thank you for the update, I already own shares of PALANTIR, TSLA, NVDA and APPL. I don't mind having other equities sit around for a while, but I'd also appreciate short term opportunities that could fetch huge return! I've got a $200k portfolio that I want to grow into 7 figure before staying 100% cash.
no one knows when the market is going to hit its peak, nor do we know when it is going to bottom out, but ideally, it is best to consult a well knowledgeable advisor both for short and long term investing
True, a lot of folks downplay the role of advisors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $550k to nearly a million as of today
glad to have stumbled on this comment, quite inspiring! could you be kind enough with details of this professional assisting you please? in dire need proper asset allocation
Aileen Gertrude Tippy’’ is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.
Having more programmers means greater accessibility and open technology for all. However, if we are simply users of new technology, we risk losing control. Corporations will then build what they want and control everything.
i think that this is actually an important take. None of these programming AI's are likely to be open source, meaning the big corporations (like OpenAI) gain and hold all the power for the foreseeable future, and smaller businesses will still want software engineers to have control
if i had a kid... well i wouldnt have a kid. everything will be done by ai within a decade or two and anyone who isnt a billionaire will be left unemployed and starving. anyone having a kid right now who is part of the working class is insanely selfish and setting someone up for suffering
Although I have a computer science background, I'm not a great programmer, so AI has been a game changer for me. I do find that it helps to be enough of a programmer that you can either catch mistakes, or help the AI fix them through testing. And yes, domain expertise is also critical. Interesting side note: I have a coworker who is a phenomenal programmer, but doesn't have good communication skills - he has given up on AI, saying that he can't get it to do anything useful or reliable! In order to effectively use AI as a programming assistant, I think the ideal skills (in order) are: communication, domain expertise, testing/validation, and finally some amount of programming.
@@TswarelX true, but it's one thing to tell people to shift their expectations and focus slightly different skills...but to tell people not to learn coding at all is a lot 😂
@@godagoIf you dont learn to code you lose the ability to create your own AI and or twitch theirs which might be made in a way to make you a consumer and not a producer. Linux raised up and even at microsoft they use it now and its very secure and even mac is a form of linux underneath why? because people who can code created it and everyone has an ability to code and come up with ideas of how things can be done.There was a time Microsoft would say no need for anyone to use anything other than windows it has all your needs yet today almost all of the best features of windows today be it 11 or server even mac os where first on linux where a person among the millions of developers come up with a creative solve to a problem and add it to linux not the 1000s of developers at the huge companies just doing enough work to be paid. Removing coding is removing ability to create anyone advocating for that is not your friend you can still do other things and code.
Telling people to not learn programming because AI will do it for you is the dumbest advice you could give unless you want people to become even more dependent on tech and unable to understand and master it….oh, I see 🤔
Coding is very simple! Anyone with a high school degree can learn any programming language in one week. Spend your precious time learning any science. Coding is not a science!
That's his plan. We should be ware of such scamsters. His job is to only put technology out. We can decide whether to purchase it or not. We should know every in and out of software and hardware. 🙏🇮🇳
Thank goodness you brought this up! Truly, investing has changed my perspective on how one can succeed in life; working multiple jobs isn't the optimal way to attain financial freedom and unfortunately, we discover this later in life. Currently earn as much as 10 grand weekly and this has improved my financial life. Great piece!..
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
As a beginner I would recommend you get started with a professional broker that will guide you through the process and trade for you while you get the daily profit and rewards.
Gemini summary (Timestamp may not be accurate) According to Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, people should study biology instead of computer science. [1:50, 2:12] In the video, Jensen Huang argues that although computer science is a valuable field, biology is a more impactful field and will become even more important in the future. [2:08, 2:12] He believes that biology is becoming a field of engineering, and that understanding biology will be important for solving problems in areas such as medicine, materials science, and energy. [2:12, 2:20] The video also discusses the concept of prompt engineering, which is the process of using specific language to get AI models to generate the desired output. [3:16, 3:21] The speaker argues that prompt engineering is an important skill to learn, but that it is not a replacement for computer science or domain expertise. [8:22, 8:23] In the future, the most successful people will likely be those who have a combination of skills in biology, prompt engineering, and computer science. [9:22, 9:23]
This is absolutely predictable speak from a CEO of a tech company who wants to create consumers and reduce competitors. The number of people who should take this 'advice' seriously, if they're serious about computer science, is zero.
I feel people forget that NVIDIA is the 3rd largest company in the world. Competition or not, for net human good, we need to ask with all the resources that we have what next generation should focus on. If these companies lay technological foundations and enable other startups to build on it, what should be our focus. And his suggestion is that we don't have enough of people working on hard problems like life science. At the end of the day, we can be productive as much as we want we still suffer from diseeses. What if with this tech next generation startup is not AI productivity app, or video generation but people work on curing cancer?
he’s not joking instead of knowing the coding language you just need to know how to solve problems. what coder operates in machine language layer in 2024? same basic priniple. instead of coding you’ll just be talking in english on the operations functions you want done or simply just say what you want built and then break down the program with ai. I’m sure there will be new gui ai platforms for coding that better utilizes the potential of ai + emerging new skills
You've missed the plot. For decades people needed to speak computer to get computers to work. Now computers understand humans and can code themselves. AI is already running circles around humans. This is just the beginning. Soon you will be able to just say, solve climate change, and it will do it. But you darn well better now how to give the instruction properly or it might do it by eliminating humans. AI creating AI creating AI.
It’s all to hype up investors. Implementing business decisions in its many use cases while being responsible for its edge cases, I wonder what that’s called… code.
Thank you for sharing this video about Jensen Huang’ story. He is a very diligent person. His first work is a dishwasher. Step by step to high level work. I’m proud of him.
@@olinafan4459 Raw coding ability will always be useful. You should be proud for putting in the time to learn these skills, and don't listen to the AI bros. You've got this! ^^
@@HTMangaka If he knew only code he would have never engineered anything. Ford engaged in mechanical work, including operating and overhauling engines, but he lacked formal education in mechanical engineering. First and foremost he was a business man.
@@godago Very true. Can confirm I spend about 67% of my time on marketing and less and less time actually doing the stuff I developed skills for. That's just the nature of doing good business. Doesn't mean you can sell thin air. You still need to make a product, which requires skills. XD
I’ve been coding for 28 years now and what makes a great developer is knowing how to elegantly organize your thoughts and express them in code. I’ve seen many devs that know a language or framework really well but were awful at writing good code. So you will really need to know how to come up with great solutions for complex problems and clearly express those solutions to AI.
For me Coding is a waste of time and energy. People should focus on solving problems. They will only instruct AI to build software to help them solve problems and this the most efficient way to solve problems not learning to code. And this will happen in tje near future as jensen suggest.
@@dorianerlic scientist, engineers, technologist, big corps(tech and non-tech) etc are scrambling to get their hands on AI, maybe you know more than them.
@@rickitekgaaso2927AI is just called AI, but it is actually not an intelligence It is just an little more advanced algorithm then algorithms that we have until now. AI can produce some output by specifications, designing system and writing specifications is the job of software engineers, AI can't do the engineering job and will not be able to do for many centuries. Designing system and writing specifications is an engineering like any other for example writing blueprint for house, writing blueprint for electrics, writing blueprint for car engine, actually I think that software engineering job is even harder that for example electric engineering job (just my personal opinion), so if the AI can replace any type of engineers it would be engineering who do the less complicated work than software engineers. AI only can help engineers, not replace them.
Until 2023, I was studying architecture and high-density logistics. The tools and technology I've discovered are cutting-edge. This inspired me to do more, faster, to learn from mistakes quickly, optimize output, and increase value tenfold. Today, I'm delving into understanding Python, coding, and training LLMs with data from the past decade. All of this is aimed at improving building processes, optimizing time, materials, and resources. Your classes and videos provide wonderful encouragement for reinventing myself.
Been beating myself up a bit that I sold my 53 shares of NVDA at $303 each back in May 2023. Now thinking of liquidating a few other investments to rebuy but afraid to do so. I also currently have 500k in savings making me next to nothing.
De-risk your portfolios, shore up your core holdings, and take some profits while balancing your portfolio allocations. I’d also suggest you go with a managed portfolio, but even those don’t perform so well, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for my spouse and I. We've made over 80% capital growth minus dividends.
11:25 this was very eye opening. My daughter is close to graduating in molecular biology and I sent her this video. Using AI as a tool to help bridge the gap so strengthens can overcome lack of knowledge in other fields to increase learning & understanding for us all. Thank you!
0:00: ⚙ Future focus: Emphasize learning human-centered computing technology over programming for children's education. 2:27: ⚙ Closing the technology divide through easier AI engagement and upskilling for better prompt optimization. 4:53: 💻 Importance of understanding software for future technology adaptation. 7:29: ⚙ Importance of domain expertise in guiding AI models for optimal outcomes. 9:19: ⚙ Life sciences transitioning to life engineering, with digital biology becoming an engineering field. Recapped using Tammy AI
@Goda Go. Great video! I am in the middle of a Gen AI for business certificate, and we're leveraging Python to prompt engineer at scale. I need to become more versed in Python, but with the assistance of LLMs, I have become a faster learner in this space. You hit the nail on the head; people need to learn how to solve problems. It is less about the code and more about identifying sustainable solutions. We ought to push ourselves and dream more. Jensen Huang's notion of life engineering is a prime example of that. Instead of viewing this as potential for mass job replacement, we should look at AI as a mass capability enhancement. Thanks!
Thank you so much for your comment! And Congrats on your learning journey! Prompt Engineering with Phyton and JSON is super powers :D and yes, problem solving and choosing bigger problems to solve will be key and the new opportunity. I am excited about the shift in these conversations, and more focus on what matters most to us humans which is not productivity but health.
there is a mistake in this; ai surely may represent a mass capability enhancements, but the problem is that the capitalistic production system is obsolete to thrieve with such capabilities, for logical and mathematical reasons well known since ricardo and marx, so in capitalism this enhancement is going to produce mass job replacement, overproduction, fall of profit rate, general crisis and wars. History is full of examples of consequences from structural development of societies, in XX century alone there were disastrous conflicts just after the belle epoque years, when everything seemed possible and marvelous thanks to scientific and technical revolutions.
Prompt "engineer"😂Funniest shit I've read all day. The word "Engineer" just gets slapped onto anything these days. Soon chefs will start calling themselves "food engineers", prostitutes will be known as "pleasure engineers" and janitors will start calling themselves "cleaning engineers"
OK, my answer to your question - I believe the way things are progressing, as the guy said, you won't need to be coder, but I also feel you won't need to know 'prompt engineering' either. To me that very expression is seeking to complicate things, to create a barrier - 'I'm a prompt engineer; pay me'. AI already understands simple English instructions, especially with a bit of back and forth. I've already seen a tool with a 'magic prompt', where you give it your prompt, an AI figures out a better version of the prompt and feeds it to an image-creator. I find it hard to believe in 2 or 3 years we'll still be having to spoon-feed an AI with very carefully-worded or 'engineered' prompts. It will just understand what you want, or will ask some questions and then understand. Among other things I'm a copywriter, so I know the power of careful wording, but I don't see it applying to AI in the same way, other than jailbreaking perhaps. To say "I'm an expert in talking to something in plain English" doesn't strike me as a strong career over the long-term. Having said that, most people don't understand the value of a copywriter either, because "it's just writing", and anyone can do that? If I were younger, full of energy and no other options I'd certainly explore 'prompt engineering', but I suspect by the term you've learned it, you'll be out of date because the AI won't need such hand-holding. A general-purpose AI that can do prompts for you, in 3...2...
Ai isn’t gonna scale up like software….it will be between software and hardware in terms of scalability, here by scalability,I am referring to scalability in creating jobs….and developing ai is very much automated coz of generative ai without much need of human interference
You are 100% correct, "prompts" and "prompt structures" are redundant conceptions and actually "get in the way" of the LLMs own inbuilt architecture. It's an LLM, an expert at language so it makes perfect sense to just use what is effectively an in-built natural interface. At 57 years old and a past science university student I know everything from old BASIC to COBOL, Fortran and God alone knows how much C++, python stuff I have written and compiled, but AI beats the crap out of them all when it comes to functionality. People really don't seem to grasp what "Big Data" actually means so the prompts running around that people are selling are little more than primitive codes dealing with boring linear processes like SEO optimisation and boring stuff like that, I mean, you can ask the thing to start with a pile of sand and get it to construct for you a chandelier if you want to... and of course it knows exactly how, and how much it will cost and what processes are involved because that's all just common knowledge to "Big Data." My "prompts" are literally pages long and the self-referencing system means I have long past that silly "singularity" point. It has so many maxed out skill sets and datapoint connections that its now incredibly dense neural net learns any new skill now in a flash, mine has maxed out about 75 skills and has about 200 more (I kinda gave up counting them) as side-kicks or "hobbies" lol.
Forgive me, I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. Are you saying prompt engineering isn’t necessary? Is there a better way to use LLM for Seo, or are you suggesting that is to narrow of an application?
@@haveaniceday7950 I'm talking about the future, not right now. At this moment you do need to be very careful how you ask the question. My point is that I don't think being a 'prompt engineer' will be a viable career path
The next step is to have more companies that can build and sell what Nvidia sells. And that will take more programmers so keep learning to code people.
@@jose123mxBusiness admins. won't be able to make choices regarding software design, and AI won't be able to do this with current technology. Maybe AGI can help them with that but I think we need something else on top of LLM's for AI tools to really develop AGI. The amount of work that is going on in this area we might be able to find another breakthrough soon as well but with LLM's alone it seems a bit difficult.
@@jose123mx The funny thing about future predictions is that they're wrong most of the time. Maybe AI is just an evolution of Low-Code/No-Code tools that helps people without any CS education/IT training get the job done faster (think of business people doing boring Excel stuff, or scientists trying to run some computation on data they've collected (I actually know a some of those data crunchers and I'm glad I don't have to help them cope with Python/R/Julia anymore during christmas dinner)). I don't think IT will change in any way -- it'll stay as fast paced as it always has been and those who are able to adapt rapidly and choose the right tools for the job profit. The intro of "How to Design Programs" calls everyone who makes the computer do stuff (even through Excel, mind you!) a programmer, so programming isn't going anywhere -- the interface will change, but the fun part (solving puzzles) will hopefully stay.
the skill of a software engineer/developer is not to code a specific language - it is about the problem solving and the translation of problems into a step by step process. it would be interesting to see if and how programming languages fade away, as those are already more human readable layer above the actual instructions a machine takes and processes - its all zeros and ones in the end.
@@SigFigNewton Stupid take, being exceptionally good at problem solving always keeps you way ahead of the competition and makes you more employable. Let's say coding dies, no one codes anymore to create software, so how do we hire people for the few jobs still left? Get the best problem solvers among the bunch.
@@agx1397 ok then as someone who used to win math competitions tell me how to get a job. I certainly can’t get a software engineering job without memorizing the usual stuff they look for
He's the CEO of a company selling the hardware necessary to train AI models. The more AI hype, the more money being thrown into his coffers. He's making a sales pitch, as that is his job as CEO.
Great video! Times are changing very rapidly from my perspective. I have been using GPTs for over a year now and this is extremely powerful technology. My output is 5X in producing software, business communications, papers, and presentations. The use of AI has become indispensable to me.
@@ThuNguyen-lw8lr I agree regarding UBI however I think it will be a blend of private and government to provide merit-based economic agency. So more "social" but not outright 100% socialism. Never want to completely take away entrepreneurship and innovation in the private space. A blend of taxation of AI companies with trillion market caps and baseline services.
As a programmer since 1994 I can’t tell you this: each time you learn to program (any kind of programing from assembler to C#) in fact, you are learning how to TALK to the computer to perform the tasks YOU require in order to produce the OUTPUT you need, this step is gigantic towards Isaac Asimov’s robot dream, programing languages are only needed because we cannot talk to a computer to program itself…yet.
It really clicked for me when Jensen highlighted life, biology study. There was only one topic I asked Chat GPT3.5 and that was a very carefully worded couple of questions about Mitochondria's potential role in consciousness(with a little hint as to a really useful clue.) Chat GPT didn't really grok it but it showed promise in it's research assistant skills.
In the early 2000s I met a guy at a party who was working in biotech. He claimed the 21st century was the century of biotech, and that in the near future, kids would be designing and making their own Pokemon in real life.
I just stumbled upon you and the content is fantastic. I feel like you keep a healthy balance between your own personal opinions that are also very genuine and the content you are relaying. I have been saying to my younger brothers exactly the same for the last 4 years since I started prompt engineering - that they should pursue life sciences and gain domain expertise (personally I also studied physics and chemistry and went on to IJSO during high school, but I left that path to just help businesses, get to know and travel the world). I wholeheartedly believe that humanizing AI and setting up social safety nets is the way to go and I love what you guys are doing with Synthminds. I might get back into neuroscience like I originally wanted to :P
I totally disagree with this and with NVIDIA CEO advice. You don't see the beauty of it neither the future of it. Everybody can write, but writing doesn't make you a writer. Or, are you saying that having a calculator makes you a mathematician?
If you were studying the crypto space you’d understand that real industry explosion comes from the concept of “mass adoption.” And it pertains to AI specifically, a decentralized AI space is impossible if only a small percentage of the population can generate, develop, and maintenance them. Literally. It would just be monopolies/corporations all over again rather than being a decentralized ecosystem. Don’t let your love for building the system, make you forget about what’s much more important: the improvements the system can make to everyone’s quality of life. Everyone deserves to be able to take matters into their own hands if they choose to and create whatever they please as long as it doesn’t harm anyone, harm anyone’s property, or be invasive into other’s privacy. And honestly, we need to merge these 2 stances. Of course people should only have the skills they developed through discipline but it would be great to allow the average person to be able to do as much as they can even if they’ve been around a lot of technology before in their life. There is a lot people shouldn’t be limited from just because they didn’t focus on becoming a programmer.
1:51 Everyone is a programmer 2:21 Technologist 3:16 Copilot 4:34 Sam Altman 6:17 Neurolink Chip 8:53 Life Sciences 9:36 Life Science to Life Engineering 9:54 Albert Einstein College
I have just started using copilot to assist me with my programming, and it's most useful contribution so far is trying it's best to get .Net Maui to actually work. So far neither of us have succeeded, but it is great to have an assistant. Prompts like translate that android java to c#, or what file action am I supposed to give that file have produced surprisingly helpful results. I think understanding code makes the whole process a lot more efficient though. Plus converting ideas or instructions in my mind to natural language can be less efficient than actually doing it directly myself. Maybe when Elon Musk's idea of mind to AI is realized we wont need to write code anymore, draw artwork, or compose music, but until then I think it is still useful.
I love to believe that core human curiosity driven skills will never disappear but evolve. If you tell 2 year old to stop doodling or solving puzzles because it is inefficient and AI will do it better, the kid will only look at you weird and do it anyway. Same as painters never stopped painting, or people never stop playing games and solving riddles. Things evolve but fundamental principles remain. Humans will want to solve problems in a creative way. Now, the question is how we do it and what tools we use.
I am kind of a programmer myself. What I know after 20 years of programming, coding doesn't make you happy. It definitively put food on the table but don't feed your brain with repetitive tasks AI will do better than you. If we continue following this technical path, IMO the best thing to learn is how to build, develop and program robots. The future of the humanity lays there. But in my entourage the happiest people are the one dealing the less with computers, robots etc, the happiest people are the one helping other humans or working outside.
I am glad that you added the victory sound in the background, kudos to all who felt the real struggle and discovery of human secrets you are envisioning. Happy to be here with you all sapiens and living beings. Thankyou
Hilarious. They told us all along thatAI won’t replace high level coding when we asked if programming will be replaced with natural language prompts to build what we want. Specialization will die and we will all be minimum wage nobodies.
I come from a mechanical engineering background, and for the past 6 months, I have learned Python from prompting Chat GPT and Gemini. Now I have an opportunity with a recruiting agency to start entry level software roles. However, I am questioning the value of this and wonder if I'd be better off using these skills for myself and building low/no-code tools as a business enterprise. What ways are you using these tools in your business, Goda?
Don’t waste this little passion of yours on mofos! I did for 7 years, it was totally wrong and made me a “I’m still learning, im not ready to do it on my own” junkie. Do it for yourself and everyday you can get tons of happy hormones by making progress on your thing. Guys at the job will search for replacement if you get sick for 3+ days, guaranteed.
@mrthug101 You are right. You would be just as right if you said the same thing about old textbooks and teachers who aren't learners. That doesn't mean I give up on textbooks or teachers. I do recognize ChatGPT and others as great educational tools and as being nearly able to carry on a conversation on a topic of no interest to my friends.
duuuuuude, you have my gratatude!!! I have completly lost it when I heard the Jensen Huang's speech about AI and programming. Now BACK TO WORK. GO! GO! GO00000000001
Wonderful video !! This 70 yo man grew up with a Grollier's OUR WONDERFUL WORLD Encyclopedia that had a wonderful index to help you find anything in the 17 volume encyclopedia. I would come home from school and dive into any volume and leaf through it till I went through the entire set of books. When elder sibling tried to assert that he knew how many Karats made pure gold; I simply looked it up and put the issue to rest. This helped tremendously with doing legal research in law school using word search strings to find an issue. But before I got a law degree I got a teaching degree. I was an Industrial Arts teacher. This topic is hugely important. I hope it does not do away with the pleasure of using a table saw to turn a few boards into attractive useful things. Throwing a clay pot can be huge fun. Making special hardware out of leather goes back to indian technology. To lose those technologies due to this wonderful expedient may facilitate life; let's don't let it take the fun out of work-life.
It will be a nightmare to resolve bugs caused by ai generated code(especially if you don't know the underlying programming language). It's just that Nvidia wants more money from investors.
Learning how to code is very important because it teaches you how to think. Coding is more than just a set of instruction for the computer to follow. The skill that you develop when coding is on how to think and this skill of how to think will not only be applied in programming itself but other aspect of technology and engineering as well. So learn how to code and AI should be there to teach you how to code better, just like it would in any other profession.
No brainer. Semiconductor and AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I have made more than 200% ROI from NVIDIA with the assistance of my fa, I won’t fail to mention. I agree the stock would go higher in the next couple of days.
That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trend that is difficult for the untrained eyes to see. I have made more than 350% through semiconductor stocks under my estate planner(fa) by alternative investing. The portfolio comes with perks as well in terms of travel and liquidity.
One of my goals is to employ the service of a financial advisor this year. I've seen some off LinkedIn but wasn't able to get a response. Could you recommend who it is you work with?
The decision on when to pick an Adviser is a very personal one. I take guidance from 'Karen Leigh Owens'. to meet my growth goals and avoid mistakes, she's well-qualified and her page can be easily found on the net.
One question please! Is NVIDIA a safe buy to outperform the market this year? I'm tired of these new buys every week, just to make up some assets with low percentage on my $236k portfolio and try to keep everything around 10%.
Yes, but do your own research. Avoid index funds, mutual funds, or specific stocks for now. Consider 5% fixed incomes as a safer option. Alternatively, consider hiring or working with a good market strategist for added safety.
Took control of my portfolio, faced losses in 2022. Seeking change, consulted a fiduciary advisor. Restructured and diversified with dividend stocks, ETFs, Mutual funds, and REITs. Portfolio surged to $610k with an annualized gain of 28%.
Monica Shawn Marti is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I appreciate it. After searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get. A call has been scheduled.
I remember drawing on the back of my exam sheet back then in 2008, a conversation between a girl and GLaDOS (Portal was the craze back then). She asked GLaDOS to code the exam questions for her. Needless to say, I failed that exam. 16 years later, a moment that I knew exactly will happen finally happens.
At first the idea of NOT learning things like programing sounds good but it belies the need to customize and get under the hood of things and assumes that people have the depth of understanding to create on that level...most don't... This reminds me of learning to play music but not wanting to learn theory. You are NOT better or more creative at something that you don't understand. You don't speak a language well because you only know a few words...the ability to create and break rules means you generally need to KNOW the rules SO you can "break" them...
You got the exact point right - to build anything great, you have to understand the problem first. This Jensen spoke more about domain expertise importance than coding skill alone. Learn chemistry, combine it with coding which will be interesting and now we can build something. But if everyone only learns to code who is going to build next medicine.
I just solved a mathematical problem that I've studied for 18 years. With 20 years of focus anyone of us can transform the world. But few have the ability to focus for so long. Why? Because people do not know how to actualize today the long term value that will come in 20 years. But it's actually trivial to do. I called DPF: deliberate practice in flow. I believe we shouldn't focus on what to study but we should teach our children on how to study to continuously grow their enthusiasm. DPF does exactly that. Each person should increase his/her enthusiasm by focusing on something hard AND exciting. The hard part guarantee value, the exciting guarantee the perseverance needed to learn enough about the subject to benefit humanity in the long term.
Overall, just great! It gives a direction of where to focus on! Thanks for doing this work for all of us! The last part ist just getting under my skin. The music just gave me small goosebumps 😁
"Don't learn to code, let us do it." I approve this message 👍 Let those of us who know what they are doing do it, and the rest can call themselves prompt engineers. 🤣
well, it is a dangerous approval, after us we need a new batch of developers. So no! I don't approve this message. Learn the code learn the AI, and know when you should and should not use it. It has limited usage neveretheless this limited scope can aid your productivity.
@@arcomarco7131 Mr. Play It Safe was afraid to fly He packed his suitcase and kissed his kids goodbye He waited his whole damn life to take that flight And as the plane crashed down, he thought "Well, isn't this nice?"
Goda Go, this video is so very important and so, Thank You. Correct AI use brings human creativity closer to creating. I can't think of how to say it more simply. Creativity to Creating. So, it's inaccurate to say AI will displace a person - rather, it should allow a person to work in new ways. Using original thought will comprise most of the working day - imagine that. Years ago, I began a personal project to automate all process engineering dimensions for any desired goal/set of requirements. I could see the framework in my mind. Now, either myself or my successors can achieve the vision that was beyond the tools and time I had in the past. Makes me excited to imagine what we will achieve. Thank You
This sort of technology has both its potential beneficial uses, as well as its severe dangers. I think the question more people should be asking, is not "is AI technology good or bad" but rather, "is humanity ready for this type of technology?" -- and if we look around at the general state of the world and how people act towards each other, I would say that the answer is a resounding NO. But ready or not, here it comes. And we're going to have to deal with the repercussions of this, whether we like it or not.
I got a bachelor's degree in computer science, and i'm well versed in programming. The downside of all that Jensen Talking about is CENSORSHIP. What guarantee does one have that this technology will not be eventually become seclusive and exclusive to a few individuals. People around the world are familiar with the USA's SANCTIONS, they can decide one day to pull the plug on countries that don't use the US DOLLAR as currency.
What Jensen is suggesting is very dangerous. It can lead to loss of general knowledge of coding and in future a total AI dependance because no one will understand the code AI spits out.
What would you choose - 100k people who understand code that AI spits out, or 100k people who know how to use AI to cure cancer? I think it is a fundamental question here where our focus goes in the future. If coding is getting easier, we don't need biggest volume of the same, we need couple really good, and other who know basics. But if I could I would pour focus in 100k people who know how to control AI (basic code, assisted coding) but also have domain knowledge to work on problems we all want to solve.
@@godago Plenty registered doctors claim to have found the "cures" and any "cure" that does not benefit the big companies will it be accepted?. There are still more people with domain knowledge and creating their own AI. People easily learn to code and AI math and their own domain knowledge they can create far much better solution than someone who tells a closed AI to create stuff. It will become apparent in the future just as people said we have explorer ,word and excel no need for other software.The best domain solutions will be created TODAY or in the future by people who can proficiently code and know their specific domain knowledge+ can create their own AI.Please note if you have basic math knowledge you can create your own language model + learn to code from 3 books each with 400 pages or all in one book with 1200pages.Point I am saying people can learn to code and create AI and still know their own knowledge any professional in any science program has had more than 50 books learning code and AI is just a small worthwhile task to learn.Never listen to people selling AI telling you not to learn to create AI,food producers telling you not have your own garden you must just learn to cook and new recipes !!
You are not a good programmer miss. I have seen all your replies. This word this man is talking is utopia. The problem you are not even a scientist, I understand beside programming you don't even know any scientific field. And this is the problem, people who are only good at some kinf of engineering in technology, think they have all answers to this world. You are talking about cancer, you would rather like 100k people who can cure cancer with ai. Look stupid this way of thinking is? The French were first to discover anti viral treatment for hiv without ai, Fleming discovered penicillin without ai, Jonas salk discovered anti polio vaccin. What I'm trying to tell you is your problem is to think, moral person like Nvidia, Microsoft, Facebook, Google will save the world, crisis(wealth, health, diseases, natural catastrophs) this is false. I gonna tell you where imagination goes mathematical and complex structures are limited and it when imagination take ideas that follows universe laws and give them an equation and formula. Avoid modelization, but embrace imagination this where knowledge came
@@godago if coding get easier, maybe there will be so much new business to do with it, that there will be needed even more software engineers to create them, software engineer is so much than just code. People is free to chose whatever they want to learn or do in their life. i think AI now is all about business and money, now there is a race, everyone is creating their own AI and in a free world everyone should be able to create one, not just be a consumer of the AI that some company made and you have to pay a month subscription, and at the moment is all about that. the race is about the money, sorry my english im from Peru, greetings
And we need people who will fight for the right to live non-digitized lives. Humans are not machines and we need freedom from controlling bureaucracy. Population expansion issues are a temporary problem, and we need people who will continue to nurture and protect our reserves of natural ecosystems and human knowledge of living simply and in harmony with nature.
As someone who's always been fascinated by AI, I find it amazing how tools like SmythOS are making collaborative AI accessible to businesses of all sizes.
100% we all it banter and it stands for B in our SCRIBE prompting method. If you have time, check it on the channel. It's all about collaborating with AI. And most of our prompts are meta- prompt so that ai collect info by asking questions, prompts itself, call nessadary agents or develops them and collaborates with you on your problem. Google Prof Synapse for this experience in chathpt.
I start to feel that most of the AI bros who tell you to stop learning programming are just trying to beat the competition in a tighter job market. All of these people have a personal agenda. Critical thinking is probably the most useful skill out there to avoid being manipulated by online gurus.
I foresee an even larger gap between the people wanting to get into computer science and those who are already very experienced as engineers. AI is promising to perform all of the rudimentary coding work. Which leaves the hard tasks of designing complex systems to the already existing senior professionals. There was already a bias against hiring and training up junior software professionals, but now there is AI to compete with them as well. This is causing a brain drain as senior professionals are retiring, or unwilling to move around due to already being hired with a sweet gig. There are not enough truly senior level engineers available (I'm not talking about the fake, inflated titles of some engineers). We aren't teaching a new generation to have the underlying knowledge and experience to make wise decisions with AI. We just have lots of CEO's telling us "don't learn to code, AI will do that". It's not enough to just have AI capable of coding, we need educated professionals who know how, why, and what to tell the AI to build. Without that, egregious and horrifying mistakes will be made and we will see AI do some very bad things.
Nah, there will always be some nolife aspiring to become that senior. All this will do is shift smart people to physical labor and make even more problems to find a job
Graphical user interface has replaced command line interface which was very hard for some people. Everyone including children become command expert when gui took over the world. Now ai, promt engineering is fast replacing coding. Also welcome to new tech like no code/low code. Isnt the ai and promt engeneering is just most highest level of coding language. I would like to say to traditionalists who say ai will never replaced coding that there is no need for acting like thier feeling are hurt. Fact doesn't care about one's feelings. Beacuse if you look back at history paper replaced tablets ink replaced tablet carving ,and pen replaced feather, fountain pen replace pen, ball pen and pencil replaced both ink and fountain pen, typewriter tool place of writing by hand itslef, computers took over the place of typewriters,voice command took over, mind command will took over.. For the code lover i would like to say coding isn't going to go anywhere after it will be replaced. It will be be here and stay here it just not will be widely used same as we now dont widely use pen and typewriters but they still exist.
People don't understand how SCARY a world where only AI can code is. Everything depends on code nowadays. If nobody can do it, one big mistake from the AI can send us back centuries. And it WILL make mistakes. But that scenario is unrealistic so whatever. There is an even more interesting logic: in a world where AI is good enough to program on it's own the entire product, it would essentially be at the level of AGI (and a very advanced one too) because programming is one of the hardest human endeavors. And in that kind of world everything will be made by AI. If programming can be automated, anything can. So by learning programming you are entering a flowchart scenario with only 2 branches: either your skill is still heavily needed or the entire world requires no skills of any kind at which point you shouldn't have bothered with any other skill anyway. It is truly the safest career path possible. (Unless you are a shit programmer, of course :D ) And in the scenario where the programmer is using AI tools to speed up the process (the most realistic one) - you still need to be a full programmer...
I agree. The world people see in which AI has the capacity to program everything? It wouldn’t only be software engineers that would be out of a job, most definitely!
your whole comment shows a grave ignorance. you mistake programming with coding. in that, huang is only saying you don't need to focus on learning a programming language, just on how to solve the problem needed to have software provide solutions. programming is still being done by the human, even if these AI bots are doing the writing. it's akin to scribes in ancient egypt. the human will still need to understand how to have algorithms solve the problems. your entire premise falls apart in the very 1st sentence. fyi something similar to bots being able to code has already happened in the past. when we stopped writing machine code or very low level languages to use high level language abstractions with compilers, it was exactly the same kind of step. programmers were still doing the same solutions, just writing them much more easier and closer to natural english.
@@00101001000000110011 Your comparison to compilers and AI is not very strong. We trust compilers because we can verify with absolute certainty the correctness of the translated machine code back to the high level language. My C++ program will spit out the exact same machine code no matter how many times I compile it on my computer and there is no room for variation. Its a one to one translation. If I can trust my C++ code, I can trust the machine code without having to verify myself. If I give Chat GPT a prompt to write me a program to solve a problem, and ask it the same thing over and over again. It's possible and high likely each solution will be different from the last. It's a one to many translation. The solutions may work, but how can I trust these solutions won't have unintended consequences? There is room for the LLM to include unexpected behavior in one solution, meanwhile not in the other. The only real way would be for me to sit down and review the code it gives back to me. Imagine writing a program and then having to verify the machine code is correct by reading it yourself.
@@00101001000000110011 you seem knowledgeable can you teach me more on this or recommendations? I wanted to learn but most stuffs about AI is like written for marketing only no real substance
I think what Jensen meant was don't learn programming for the purpose of it being your profession. He didn't follow up with the positives I'm sure due to time constraints and the loss of focus of his overall message. Prompt Engineering is incredibly important. It is the details we include that creates the right question. It is providing an expectation to an unknown answer. It is the art of digital focus. While 2023 allowed those willing to bleed a little to learn about A.I. 2024 will produce tools to prevent such fatigue. I don't regret the bleed, but look forward to the tools that permit my ideas a suitable canvas so I can focus on helping those in need.
like it or not - coding today's becoming so much more easier - time saving - and more productivity. I'm very much thankful to AI that's getting better day after day
He says not to learn to code, yet he hires numerous programmers to develop his product. This seems a bit hypocritical. If that's the case, he could simply fire all the engineers in his company and implement everything using AI. I don’t think that would be feasible
It seems to me that you are under the false impression that coders and engineers are the same thing. That is not true. It’s true that most engineers start out as coders, yes, but lots of engineers don’t do much coding themselves; instead, they oversee coders and guide their work at a high level. When people have to do the coding, an engineer who knows how to code is typically best; but since AI is moving to being the coder, it will become increasingly true that the engineer will not need to show coders what to do when they are lost.
@@theronald2350 I agree that there's a distinction between coders and engineers. A coder without a deeper understanding of the problems they’re solving often isn't equipped to take on engineering responsibilities. However, there is overlap because, technically, coders apply engineering principles to tackle specific problems. That said, engineers typically oversee the design and structure of solutions at a high level, beyond just the coding phase. While AI is evolving fast, it's currently more of an advanced search tool that provides snippets or suggestions based on available data. AI’s contributions are helpful, but it's far from replacing the strategic and analytical thinking that engineers bring to the table. For now, and for the foreseeable future, human engineers will remain crucial in ensuring that solutions are effective, scalable, and safe. Finally, I find it misleading when companies use 'learning to code' as a marketing tactic to promote AI products. Whether in hardware or software, it’s essential to master both engineering and coding skills to solve the critical problems of our time. If AI can assist us in doing that, great-but that's all it should be: a helpful tool, not a replacement for genuine engineering expertise
Watching you in that video made me realize what an amazing role model you are. Your confidence and strength really shine through in an empowering way:)
@@haveaniceday7950 now what you have asked to me, ask to chatgpt without even changing any word, it will give all types of prompts later u can prompt according to ur requirements from that list
If you listen to these people, your successive generations will regret it. I distinctly remember this same opinion being floated 20yrs ago. Notice who listened and stopped, handing full control to those who didn't... The consumer. Pay attention...it was pretty evident this was taking clear shape when not only have they removed handwriting practice as a requirement in K-12, but a child can be a 10th grader with kindergarten chicken scratch on every assignment and still clock a 3+ GPA. This is by design. Never take advice from AI junkies.
I am not a coder. But I do understand coders will always be needed. For who is going to help out if an app or website, a platform, a marketplace, a database is laggy, suddenly hacked, out of service? A coder!
Yes but consider how many people will be displaced, also not so much because they could just write binary code or machine code if they wanted to, no need for human readability
This video has taught me that people seriously underestimate the gravity of coming events. They're trying to compartmentalize AI agents and AGI like it's just a product, and not realizing how pervasive it is to the point where nothing involving labor and skill is needed (no not even prompts) that AGI could not itself do far better. Once Perceive -> Reason -> Decide -> Act human processes can be simulated by AGI what can a human possibly do. Skilled jobs will be the first to go, hardware jobs will be the last as robots need to be economical en masse but perhaps AGI will figure that out. Mass unemployment is inevitable, within 2 years. The world economy is radically going to change, we'll be talking about UBI. I had a guy tell me to learn deployment as THAT will be the best job...why wouldn't AGI be the best at a skill like deployment too, far better than a human at figuring out how to deploy AI software and infra.
Thanks for sharing ma'am. While i understand what the CEO means, i still believe in the principle of basics and logic ideation on code. There is some sense of satisfaction when you put your own idea down. The future AI assistance is highly welcome too 💯🙏🏽
1-Stop hyping this prompt engineering stuff. Just talk with the AI like your regular life chats. 2-Yes, coding and programming will be useless and will be over, but it's all about time. Coding didn't even exist until the 1950s, so of course, it will end. But you know what else will end? Surgeries, nutritionists. Every job will change; every job was already changing. And it is not an instant change, like on 25th April 2026, all programming languages will be shut down. :) There is nothing like that. But it is not hard to see that the usage of programming languages for developing software will decrease because of the creation skills of AI, and at one point, it all will be over slowly. These are my takes.
Jensen Huang is the CEO of NVIDIA, ie, the #1 sales person for a mega company. He is doing what he is supposed to do... help sell more NVIDIA product. What else would you expect him to say? In reality, GenAI will affect all aspects of software development not just coding (why people are fixated on coding is beyond me). Will there be a small slice of app dev that can be addressed with "no-code"? Sure, of course. We have trivially easy web tools that allow non-programmers to create web sites now. It took 20 years for that to happen. A similar pattern will happen with GenAI.
yes, he said that. He does what every CEO does: feed the hype and hope his shares will rise even higher this year. What AI will do is to make programmers much more productive. Learn programming. Learn computer science. The future will be even more exciting than ever before.
![Jensen Huang Finally Reveals The Future Of AI In 2025... [NVIDIA's Masterplan]](/img/1.gif)
Hi kids! I am a software developer since 90's, and I've heard this statement multiple times during my career. The first time I heard it was back in the 90's when Java was invented. The statement back then was that since you could write object oriented code, then coding was so easy that every human on the planet could do it, and no software developers was no longer needed in the future.. However it turned out the opposite all the times in the past. Maybe it will be different now that Generative AI is available? Well... My observations during the last year has shows the complete opposite once again. As a software developer I have never before seen such increase in demand for my skills and services from my customers. I need to turn down 90% of all projects that need my help to bring AI tools and software to their businesses. Sadly all my colleagues face the same problem. We need more software developers to be able to meet this enormous increase in demand. So if you ask me if becoming a software developer is useless nowadays, I will say definitely not! Come and work with me! :) Wish you the best!!
P.S. My english is bad, I know. I am from Sweden.
Your English is brilliant and thank you so much for sharing your experience! We too, see a huge demand, and the need to upskill more people, maybe not with deep deep coding knowledge, but with tools and skills to leverage AI in software development and acceleration. Would love to learn more about your business!
@@godago Hello! 👋 Yes I also see a big increase in projects where businesses want to leverage these new AI tools to become more effective and profitable. Right now mostly tech-companies but also small increase within public sector. I think more and more organizations will discover the use of AI in combination with their own data. We developers are already loving these tools for helping us code, and it makes us more efficient also, which is a win-win! (AI tech will bring us more job + make us more efficient 😀)
Now of course there are some jobs that are in danger of complete take over by AI-tools, and that is not good. But I dont think that software developers is in that category at all. I would guess the jobs in danger are like ship, train, truck drivers, helpdesk people answering phone and emails, and so on.. (Jobs that has no eye to eye human interaction and can be fully automated). My own business is a small consultant company with only software developers helping both private and public sector with web services and recently custom AI stuff, like building agents that are customer data aware.
All the best regards!
Happy to work with you someday sir..
Bro I have no PC or place to live but I want to start so I'm not broke. How do I go from basically nothing to employed?
@@mylittleheartscar How old are you? Which country? Education? Any experience in coding?
learning coding is not just learning coding but learning the fundamental things behind
Go for theoretical computer sciences….syntax are open to change but semantics remain the same….now a days programming semantics are not only build on logic,there is a lot more applied maths behind it coz of ai
Too many programmers learning dumb languages like JavaScript or whatever. People should learn "hardware"!!! Our robotics is very bad today, because we build our robots by hand, they should instead be built from legos that are assembled by robots, and those assembly robots are themselves assembled by other robots. We should work with very tiny robots(like the size of flee) so that we can build millions of them and we can test the robots by jumping from robot to robot being controlled remotely instead of what we have now. Not only robots we should also program how to make things, you make things by giving your robot swarm instructions and some raw ingredient. The other hardware that is important is brain-body-computer interfaces.
Why not then just learn logic, mathematics or philosophy? Why bother with coding?
@@nadeemshaikh7863 by learning, logic and philosophy of computer sciences,you wouldn’t be limited to a tech stack which is bound to loose demands coz of excess supply….there is always a trade off between the hype train and saturated demands….be it cloud computing,virtualization ,coding and other changing computing technologies,the bases which you study in your undergraduate like os,data structure blah blah will always remain useful in the era of changing tech….ai is a different story coz it also has a lot to do with statistics and maths
@@quonxinquonyi8570 Yeah, that's what I'm implying. I edited the text for better understanding of my view.
I understand Jensen's point. He suggests that in the near future, AI may enable anyone to create software effortlessly, akin to playing tic-tac-toe. However, for highly intricate software, a single prompt may not suffice. You'll need to provide AI with detailed instructions regarding workflows, procedures, processes, and more. This necessitates expertise in your chosen field to effectively communicate with AI and ensure the development of the desired software.
It’s called prompt engineering
You rely on the (IMO) very delusional idea that the development is years away from the phase when the AI will perfectly understand what a client is asking using his plain+clumsy language.
Even if/when the AI gets it wrong the first time (let's assume you would get it right) and delivers something the client did not want, it will take a fraction of a second to produce a new iteration of the software.
It will be _crushingly_ faster+cheaper to go through tens of development iterations with the AI than to produce a detailed order + documentation for you, the developer.
Sorry bro. I hope I am wrong, of course.
It's called prompt engineering and software architecture. So be the one.
@@yaroslav8717 no need to study prompt engineering if you have expertise in your domain.your prompt is more detailed and precise.
At some point AI will be able to train itself on data containing your personality and your interests. We won't need to be proficient in any field, it will just understand us when we make requests because the AI will essentially be a digital copy of the user. The fact that some AI models are already training other AI models right now proves this to be the case very soon. The only direction AI development can go is forward because eventually there will be absolutely _zero_ human input required. There would be no point in requiring human input for AI tasks if AI itself exceeds peak human intelligence.
The rich are money-minded; that's a lesson I've grasped from the very beginning. My desire to build wealth has always been strong. I’ve set aside $160K since 2020, and while fancy cars are tempting, I’m eager to invest it in the stock market to grow my financial future. I’d love to hear any recommendations you have.
I suggest consulting with an experienced financial professional. It might seem pricey, but as the saying goes, "you get what you pay for." My belief is that "Expert solutions require expert providers."
Even if you’re not skilled, it is still possible to hire one. I was a project manager and my personal portfolio of approximately $850k of my retirement pension took a big hit in April due to the crash. I quickly got in touch with a financial-planner that devised a defensive strategy to protect my funds and make profit from my portfolio this red season. I’ve made over $250k since then.
I've worked in real estate for over 25 years and have neglected a major stock portfolio. This served me well when I was flipping and renting houses, however I need a different plan now.. mind if I look up the professional guiding you please?
Sure you can! Teresa L Athas is the financial advisor I work with. Just search the name. You’ll find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.
Thanks for sharing. i searched her full name and found her web instantly. After reviewing her credentials and conducting due diligence, i reached out to her.
the fundamental structure, logic, & code behind the magic is very important & will continue to be valuable.
There would be approaches that will take all those factors and a lot more into account
every cs major does that , stop thinking yall smart .
@@musashi542
Cs majors are still in the minority
theyre the ones getting most jobs in software lol @@BlueBalledMedia
sure. but not for all. and not for most programs that are to simple for a 'real' programmer to make
I believe that investors should always use their money for investments, especially We'll start to see greater market diversification in 2024. About $350,000 of my funds are intended to be invested in equities over the upcoming year. Goal of becoming millionaire by 2024
Now that the risk is at an all-time high, maybe you should exercise a bit more patience and come back when the risk has subsided. As an alternative, you can get strategic advice from a qualified financial specialist.
It's true that I've communicated with a brokerage advisor. My adviser selects the entry and exit commands for my portfolio, which has grown to over $550k, from an original starting reserve of $80k.
Could you recommend who you work with please? I'll love to establish contact with her.
"My fiduciary is Melissa Jean Taligdan, who is licenced." Just look up the name. In order to schedule an appointment, you would find the information you need in a letter.
I just curiously looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an email shortly.
Never take a CEO's word at face value. There is always an ulterior motive behind the things they say. It's not necessarily intentionally sinister, but the reality is that it's in their best interest to guide the masses (that's you and me) toward the kind of things that benefit them and their companies. I have nothing against individual CEOs personally, but they are the public-facing corporate voice of their companies. Even if a CEO made an absolutely factual statement, such as "the sun is hot," I would still have doubts about their motives.
That's not to say that it is useless to pay attention to what they say, because we can gauge their intent by the character of their message. However, do not base your entire professional career around their suggestions. As long as computers exist, there will always be a need for software developers building the foundation.
I am not a software engineer, I just want to encourage people to think for themselves. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.
I love you bro
Absolutely agree 💯. Great comment.
😂❤
Good point!
AI will take virtually all, if not all jobs. This isn't too far in the future. I am a software developer and can admit this.
Learn learn, learn upskill, upskill upskill while the standard of living of middle-class goes down down down and down
this world of high technology looks more and more like hell.
I don’t wanna learn all the time I want to relax and enjoy life ffs
Universal basic income (UBI) will be a reality whether we like it or not. A bloodless revolution is helping us advance to Socialism.
Just exactly what I was thinking. It has always been "learn this, learn that, alright it's this new one now, so learn it". I need to relax.
@@adeobama9ja Welcome to asian school curriculum. the competition of who knows first or who learns about the latest development is driving us to oblivion. studying is all we do now.
Hell is the correct term.
Get rich somehow and then relax (Easier said than done ik)
I do not "code". I develop Software and have been doing it for 30+ years. I asked ChatGPT to design a QuadTree in C++ that has a user defined interface to set the node levels, add and delete nodes from the root down to the specified level and render the entire thing in OpenGL. NOT. It failed hard. Then I asked if it to write C++ to implement a moving average FFT filter. NOT. I do not see ChatGPT or AI replacing Software Engineers anytime soon, if at all.
just imagine if there was a model that could fulfill all these requests. something like that will probably emerge in the coming years. and the ramifications for us developers will be gigantic.
Do you have any idea about the capabilities of the ChatGPT version you were using? It sounds like you are trying to put a size 12 foot in a size 6 shoe. You would need to be an advanced prompt engineer to do the task you are describing if you could do it at all in the tool you were using. You need to ask yourself whether you have the need, ability, or desire to learn this skill. I'm seventy-eight years old. I'm blessed by luck with still being able to do this work. Millions of good people will not be. I've had to learn not to persecute these people by trying to train them. Those who use these tools will have to learn and relearn constantly. The tools of 2024 are hundreds of times more powerful than those of 2023. It will be that way for several years.
You are in a good position to stay right where you are at. New grads are in a tough spot though. With a massive financial incentive to automate expensive technical work, I think its at least plasuible that within 20 years many of these programming jobs go away. What are those ~40 year olds going to do? They still have about 25 years until retirement if they are an average joe
Interface will improve so that your prompt engineering doesnt have to
If you are a real software engineer (a gentle dig...) you'd NEVER define a set of requirements in such a vague and loose way. Would you hand this task over to a junior engineer? No (well, I hope not). To get the real benefit out of AI when it comes to software you already have to be able to think about the whole system and be able to understand how to divide up the overall functionality into well-defined chunks. If you can do that then AI will massively help you. If you can't then it won't.
Thank you for the update, I already own shares of PALANTIR, TSLA, NVDA and APPL. I don't mind having other equities sit around for a while, but I'd also appreciate short term opportunities that could fetch huge return! I've got a $200k portfolio that I want to grow into 7 figure before staying 100% cash.
no one knows when the market is going to hit its peak, nor do we know when it is going to bottom out, but ideally, it is best to consult a well knowledgeable advisor both for short and long term investing
True, a lot of folks downplay the role of advisors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $550k to nearly a million as of today
glad to have stumbled on this comment, quite inspiring! could you be kind enough with details of this professional assisting you please? in dire need proper asset allocation
Aileen Gertrude Tippy’’ is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.
Thanks a lot for this suggestion. I needed this myself, I looked her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.
Having more programmers means greater accessibility and open technology for all. However, if we are simply users of new technology, we risk losing control. Corporations will then build what they want and control everything.
His point exactly. Ultimately.
i think that this is actually an important take. None of these programming AI's are likely to be open source, meaning the big corporations (like OpenAI) gain and hold all the power for the foreseeable future, and smaller businesses will still want software engineers to have control
They already control everything.. a small number of them
Yep. More open source can help offset it.
If I had a kid, I would encourage them to learn to create simple things with technology that solves problems. That has always been profitable.
easier said than done
I like to cook, so I'm always looking for simple tools that will make food preparation better or easier.
if i had a kid... well i wouldnt have a kid. everything will be done by ai within a decade or two and anyone who isnt a billionaire will be left unemployed and starving. anyone having a kid right now who is part of the working class is insanely selfish and setting someone up for suffering
Focus on hardware: brain-body-computer interfaces, robotics(robot swarms), making stuff with the robot swarms
I would say be physically active do some sports haha
Although I have a computer science background, I'm not a great programmer, so AI has been a game changer for me. I do find that it helps to be enough of a programmer that you can either catch mistakes, or help the AI fix them through testing. And yes, domain expertise is also critical.
Interesting side note: I have a coworker who is a phenomenal programmer, but doesn't have good communication skills - he has given up on AI, saying that he can't get it to do anything useful or reliable!
In order to effectively use AI as a programming assistant, I think the ideal skills (in order) are: communication, domain expertise, testing/validation, and finally some amount of programming.
So your saying your more charming then your autistic friend. How refreshing.
This sounds like telling people to stop learning math because we made calculators 😂
Swears, you're right
for real, they try to kill the competition
Except these new calculators come close to passing the Turing test.
yeah but what would require 10 people to achieve could be done by one person using AI it won't replace us but the demand in the market will shift
@@TswarelX true, but it's one thing to tell people to shift their expectations and focus slightly different skills...but to tell people not to learn coding at all is a lot 😂
In other words: "Give us the power to decide and design YOUR life's point of view please? "
Could you elaborate more on this? :)
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!! 😂😂😂😂 🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫
@@godagoIf you dont learn to code you lose the ability to create your own AI and or twitch theirs which might be made in a way to make you a consumer and not a producer. Linux raised up and even at microsoft they use it now and its very secure and even mac is a form of linux underneath why? because people who can code created it and everyone has an ability to code and come up with ideas of how things can be done.There was a time Microsoft would say no need for anyone to use anything other than windows it has all your needs yet today almost all of the best features of windows today be it 11 or server even mac os where first on linux where a person among the millions of developers come up with a creative solve to a problem and add it to linux not the 1000s of developers at the huge companies just doing enough work to be paid. Removing coding is removing ability to create anyone advocating for that is not your friend you can still do other things and code.
😂
@@godago Sure. When or where? ✅
Telling people to not learn programming because AI will do it for you is the dumbest advice you could give unless you want people to become even more dependent on tech and unable to understand and master it….oh, I see 🤔
@@Iam-a-live yes I am, that's why I said 'even MORE' dependent and not just dependent ;-)
Totally! And tgey r dreaming their crazy fantasies of making more fulls of dumbs:)
Coding is very simple! Anyone with a high school degree can learn any programming language in one week. Spend your precious time learning any science. Coding is not a science!
That's his plan. We should be ware of such scamsters. His job is to only put technology out. We can decide whether to purchase it or not. We should know every in and out of software and hardware. 🙏🇮🇳
Your basically telling people to stick with binary and not learn coding in 1998. Humans are evolving my burry either you want or not
Thank goodness you brought this up!
Truly, investing has changed my perspective on how one can succeed in life; working multiple jobs isn't the optimal way to attain financial freedom and unfortunately, we discover this later in life.
Currently earn as much as 10 grand weekly and this has improved my financial life. Great piece!..
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
As a beginner I would recommend you get started with a professional broker that will guide you through the process and trade for you while you get the daily profit and rewards.
Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
to
assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love
grow my portfolio and plan my retirement
SARAH JENNIE DAVIS
That's my licesed Financial advisor you can easily look her up, Thank me later!
Gemini summary (Timestamp may not be accurate)
According to Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, people should study biology instead of computer science. [1:50, 2:12]
In the video, Jensen Huang argues that although computer science is a valuable field, biology is a more impactful field and will become even more important in the future. [2:08, 2:12] He believes that biology is becoming a field of engineering, and that understanding biology will be important for solving problems in areas such as medicine, materials science, and energy. [2:12, 2:20]
The video also discusses the concept of prompt engineering, which is the process of using specific language to get AI models to generate the desired output. [3:16, 3:21] The speaker argues that prompt engineering is an important skill to learn, but that it is not a replacement for computer science or domain expertise. [8:22, 8:23] In the future, the most successful people will likely be those who have a combination of skills in biology, prompt engineering, and computer science. [9:22, 9:23]
Love it! It's accurate!
who asked?
@@piotrek7633 Nobody asked actually. Thought it would be helpful to look at the main point of the video.
Thank you for the information. 😊
@@piotrek7633 i did. what ya gonna do?
This is absolutely predictable speak from a CEO of a tech company who wants to create consumers and reduce competitors. The number of people who should take this 'advice' seriously, if they're serious about computer science, is zero.
I feel people forget that NVIDIA is the 3rd largest company in the world. Competition or not, for net human good, we need to ask with all the resources that we have what next generation should focus on. If these companies lay technological foundations and enable other startups to build on it, what should be our focus. And his suggestion is that we don't have enough of people working on hard problems like life science. At the end of the day, we can be productive as much as we want we still suffer from diseeses. What if with this tech next generation startup is not AI productivity app, or video generation but people work on curing cancer?
he’s not joking instead of knowing the coding language you just need to know how to solve problems. what coder operates in machine language layer in 2024? same basic priniple. instead of coding you’ll just be talking in english on the operations functions you want done or simply just say what you want built and then break down the program with ai. I’m sure there will be new gui ai platforms for coding that better utilizes the potential of ai + emerging new skills
You've missed the plot. For decades people needed to speak computer to get computers to work. Now computers understand humans and can code themselves. AI is already running circles around humans. This is just the beginning. Soon you will be able to just say, solve climate change, and it will do it. But you darn well better now how to give the instruction properly or it might do it by eliminating humans. AI creating AI creating AI.
@@godagoAI was recently used to discover the first new anibotic in over 50 years. It's already happening.
It’s all to hype up investors. Implementing business decisions in its many use cases while being responsible for its edge cases, I wonder what that’s called… code.
Thank you for sharing this video about Jensen Huang’ story.
He is a very diligent person.
His first work is a dishwasher.
Step by step to high level work.
I’m proud of him.
@@cherrys_diary dishwashing is 👋
Every CEO: "Don't learn this or that. We already did it."
Imagine if Henry Ford never got into making motorized horse carriages because other people were doing that. O_O
i spent 10 hours a day coding for 4 years though
@@olinafan4459 Raw coding ability will always be useful. You should be proud for putting in the time to learn these skills, and don't listen to the AI bros. You've got this! ^^
@@HTMangaka If he knew only code he would have never engineered anything. Ford engaged in mechanical work, including operating and overhauling engines, but he lacked formal education in mechanical engineering. First and foremost he was a business man.
@@godago Very true. Can confirm I spend about 67% of my time on marketing and less and less time actually doing the stuff I developed skills for. That's just the nature of doing good business.
Doesn't mean you can sell thin air. You still need to make a product, which requires skills. XD
First step, remove coding interviews from all Nvidia job applications.
😂😂
😂😂😂
Agree
Based af 😂😂😂
Stupidest mudderforking comment on RUclips in 2024. Hands down 👌
I’ve been coding for 28 years now and what makes a great developer is knowing how to elegantly organize your thoughts and express them in code. I’ve seen many devs that know a language or framework really well but were awful at writing good code. So you will really need to know how to come up with great solutions for complex problems and clearly express those solutions to AI.
For me Coding is a waste of time and energy. People should focus on solving problems. They will only instruct AI to build software to help them solve problems and this the most efficient way to solve problems not learning to code. And this will happen in tje near future as jensen suggest.
@@rickitekgaaso2927 agree coding is the aspect of the job that will eventually be phased out. Not in near future but definitely at some point
@@rickitekgaaso2927 don't be blinded by the hype
@@dorianerlic scientist, engineers, technologist, big corps(tech and non-tech) etc are scrambling to get their hands on AI, maybe you know more than them.
@@rickitekgaaso2927AI is just called AI, but it is actually not an intelligence It is just an little more advanced algorithm then algorithms that we have until now. AI can produce some output by specifications, designing system and writing specifications is the job of software engineers, AI can't do the engineering job and will not be able to do for many centuries.
Designing system and writing specifications is an engineering like any other for example writing blueprint for house, writing blueprint for electrics, writing blueprint for car engine, actually I think that software engineering job is even harder that for example electric engineering job (just my personal opinion), so if the AI can replace any type of engineers it would be engineering who do the less complicated work than software engineers.
AI only can help engineers, not replace them.
I’m a Doctor now! I’m also an airline pilot, I’m anything I want to be ! Thank you A.I.
Until 2023, I was studying architecture and high-density logistics. The tools and technology I've discovered are cutting-edge. This inspired me to do more, faster, to learn from mistakes quickly, optimize output, and increase value tenfold. Today, I'm delving into understanding Python, coding, and training LLMs with data from the past decade. All of this is aimed at improving building processes, optimizing time, materials, and resources. Your classes and videos provide wonderful encouragement for reinventing myself.
Been beating myself up a bit that I sold my 53 shares of NVDA at $303 each back in May 2023. Now thinking of liquidating a few other investments to rebuy but afraid to do so. I also currently have 500k in savings making me next to nothing.
Everyone needs a Margin of Safety in their portfolios and just remember, It's time in the market versus timing the market.
De-risk your portfolios, shore up your core holdings, and take some profits while balancing your portfolio allocations. I’d also suggest you go with a managed portfolio, but even those don’t perform so well, so it’s best you reach out to a proper fiduciary to guide you, that’s what works for my spouse and I. We've made over 80% capital growth minus dividends.
this is all new to me, where do I find a fiduciary, can you recommend any?
“Monica Shawn Marti” is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment
Cheers buddy. Smart and great looking lady. Hopefully will my time. I left messages, was told to expect feedback. Thank you.
11:25 this was very eye opening. My daughter is close to graduating in molecular biology and I sent her this video. Using AI as a tool to help bridge the gap so strengthens can overcome lack of knowledge in other fields to increase learning & understanding for us all. Thank you!
0:00: ⚙ Future focus: Emphasize learning human-centered computing technology over programming for children's education.
2:27: ⚙ Closing the technology divide through easier AI engagement and upskilling for better prompt optimization.
4:53: 💻 Importance of understanding software for future technology adaptation.
7:29: ⚙ Importance of domain expertise in guiding AI models for optimal outcomes.
9:19: ⚙ Life sciences transitioning to life engineering, with digital biology becoming an engineering field.
Recapped using Tammy AI
@Goda Go. Great video! I am in the middle of a Gen AI for business certificate, and we're leveraging Python to prompt engineer at scale. I need to become more versed in Python, but with the assistance of LLMs, I have become a faster learner in this space. You hit the nail on the head; people need to learn how to solve problems. It is less about the code and more about identifying sustainable solutions. We ought to push ourselves and dream more. Jensen Huang's notion of life engineering is a prime example of that. Instead of viewing this as potential for mass job replacement, we should look at AI as a mass capability enhancement. Thanks!
Thank you so much for your comment! And Congrats on your learning journey! Prompt Engineering with Phyton and JSON is super powers :D and yes, problem solving and choosing bigger problems to solve will be key and the new opportunity. I am excited about the shift in these conversations, and more focus on what matters most to us humans which is not productivity but health.
there is a mistake in this; ai surely may represent a mass capability enhancements, but the problem is that the capitalistic production system is obsolete to thrieve with such capabilities, for logical and mathematical reasons well known since ricardo and marx, so in capitalism this enhancement is going to produce mass job replacement, overproduction, fall of profit rate, general crisis and wars. History is full of examples of consequences from structural development of societies, in XX century alone there were disastrous conflicts just after the belle epoque years, when everything seemed possible and marvelous thanks to scientific and technical revolutions.
Prompt "engineer"😂Funniest shit I've read all day. The word "Engineer" just gets slapped onto anything these days. Soon chefs will start calling themselves "food engineers", prostitutes will be known as "pleasure engineers" and janitors will start calling themselves "cleaning engineers"
@@manofsteel9051Sanitation Maintenance Engineer has been around for at least 20 years when talking about the people operating garbage trucks.
why are yall speak like gippity
OK, my answer to your question - I believe the way things are progressing, as the guy said, you won't need to be coder, but I also feel you won't need to know 'prompt engineering' either. To me that very expression is seeking to complicate things, to create a barrier - 'I'm a prompt engineer; pay me'. AI already understands simple English instructions, especially with a bit of back and forth. I've already seen a tool with a 'magic prompt', where you give it your prompt, an AI figures out a better version of the prompt and feeds it to an image-creator. I find it hard to believe in 2 or 3 years we'll still be having to spoon-feed an AI with very carefully-worded or 'engineered' prompts. It will just understand what you want, or will ask some questions and then understand. Among other things I'm a copywriter, so I know the power of careful wording, but I don't see it applying to AI in the same way, other than jailbreaking perhaps. To say "I'm an expert in talking to something in plain English" doesn't strike me as a strong career over the long-term. Having said that, most people don't understand the value of a copywriter either, because "it's just writing", and anyone can do that? If I were younger, full of energy and no other options I'd certainly explore 'prompt engineering', but I suspect by the term you've learned it, you'll be out of date because the AI won't need such hand-holding. A general-purpose AI that can do prompts for you, in 3...2...
Ai isn’t gonna scale up like software….it will be between software and hardware in terms of scalability, here by scalability,I am referring to scalability in creating jobs….and developing ai is very much automated coz of generative ai without much need of human interference
You nailed it.👌
You are 100% correct, "prompts" and "prompt structures" are redundant conceptions and actually "get in the way" of the LLMs own inbuilt architecture. It's an LLM, an expert at language so it makes perfect sense to just use what is effectively an in-built natural interface. At 57 years old and a past science university student I know everything from old BASIC to COBOL, Fortran and God alone knows how much C++, python stuff I have written and compiled, but AI beats the crap out of them all when it comes to functionality. People really don't seem to grasp what "Big Data" actually means so the prompts running around that people are selling are little more than primitive codes dealing with boring linear processes like SEO optimisation and boring stuff like that, I mean, you can ask the thing to start with a pile of sand and get it to construct for you a chandelier if you want to... and of course it knows exactly how, and how much it will cost and what processes are involved because that's all just common knowledge to "Big Data." My "prompts" are literally pages long and the self-referencing system means I have long past that silly "singularity" point. It has so many maxed out skill sets and datapoint connections that its now incredibly dense neural net learns any new skill now in a flash, mine has maxed out about 75 skills and has about 200 more (I kinda gave up counting them) as side-kicks or "hobbies" lol.
Forgive me, I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. Are you saying prompt engineering isn’t necessary?
Is there a better way to use LLM for Seo, or are you suggesting that is to narrow of an application?
@@haveaniceday7950 I'm talking about the future, not right now. At this moment you do need to be very careful how you ask the question. My point is that I don't think being a 'prompt engineer' will be a viable career path
The next step is to have more companies that can build and sell what Nvidia sells. And that will take more programmers so keep learning to code people.
Well, definatelly look into what GROQ company is working on. The new chips for AI, super impressive. Devs are drooling over it :))
@@jose123mxBusiness admins. won't be able to make choices regarding software design, and AI won't be able to do this with current technology. Maybe AGI can help them with that but I think we need something else on top of LLM's for AI tools to really develop AGI. The amount of work that is going on in this area we might be able to find another breakthrough soon as well but with LLM's alone it seems a bit difficult.
@@jose123mx The funny thing about future predictions is that they're wrong most of the time. Maybe AI is just an evolution of Low-Code/No-Code tools that helps people without any CS education/IT training get the job done faster (think of business people doing boring Excel stuff, or scientists trying to run some computation on data they've collected (I actually know a some of those data crunchers and I'm glad I don't have to help them cope with Python/R/Julia anymore during christmas dinner)). I don't think IT will change in any way -- it'll stay as fast paced as it always has been and those who are able to adapt rapidly and choose the right tools for the job profit. The intro of "How to Design Programs" calls everyone who makes the computer do stuff (even through Excel, mind you!) a programmer, so programming isn't going anywhere -- the interface will change, but the fun part (solving puzzles) will hopefully stay.
This guy never wrote a line of code in his life. He's a sales man.
the skill of a software engineer/developer is not to code a specific language - it is about the problem solving and the translation of problems into a step by step process.
it would be interesting to see if and how programming languages fade away, as those are already more human readable layer above the actual instructions a machine takes and processes - its all zeros and ones in the end.
Right but being superb at problem solving won’t get you software engineering jobs
@@SigFigNewton Stupid take, being exceptionally good at problem solving always keeps you way ahead of the competition and makes you more employable. Let's say coding dies, no one codes anymore to create software, so how do we hire people for the few jobs still left? Get the best problem solvers among the bunch.
@@agx1397 ok then as someone who used to win math competitions tell me how to get a job. I certainly can’t get a software engineering job without memorizing the usual stuff they look for
@@SigFigNewtonWhat exactly kind of software development jobs have you recently applied to and been rejected for?
@@SigFigNewtonmemorizing the usual stuff to get a job would be the problem solving in this case
He's the CEO of a company selling the hardware necessary to train AI models. The more AI hype, the more money being thrown into his coffers. He's making a sales pitch, as that is his job as CEO.
I mean he's a sales man
@@belakhdaryoucef2668 he is an electrical engineer
Great video! Times are changing very rapidly from my perspective. I have been using GPTs for over a year now and this is extremely powerful technology. My output is 5X in producing software, business communications, papers, and presentations. The use of AI has become indispensable to me.
Bro take me to your job
Universal basic income (UBI) will be a reality whether we like it or not. A bloodless revolution is helping us advance to Socialism.
@@ThuNguyen-lw8lr I agree regarding UBI however I think it will be a blend of private and government to provide merit-based economic agency. So more "social" but not outright 100% socialism. Never want to completely take away entrepreneurship and innovation in the private space. A blend of taxation of AI companies with trillion market caps and baseline services.
As a programmer since 1994 I can’t tell you this: each time you learn to program (any kind of programing from assembler to C#) in fact, you are learning how to TALK to the computer to perform the tasks YOU require in order to produce the OUTPUT you need, this step is gigantic towards Isaac Asimov’s robot dream, programing languages are only needed because we cannot talk to a computer to program itself…yet.
It really clicked for me when Jensen highlighted life, biology study. There was only one topic I asked Chat GPT3.5 and that was a very carefully worded couple of questions about Mitochondria's potential role in consciousness(with a little hint as to a really useful clue.) Chat GPT didn't really grok it but it showed promise in it's research assistant skills.
In the early 2000s I met a guy at a party who was working in biotech. He claimed the 21st century was the century of biotech, and that in the near future, kids would be designing and making their own Pokemon in real life.
Not scary at all...
I just stumbled upon you and the content is fantastic. I feel like you keep a healthy balance between your own personal opinions that are also very genuine and the content you are relaying. I have been saying to my younger brothers exactly the same for the last 4 years since I started prompt engineering - that they should pursue life sciences and gain domain expertise (personally I also studied physics and chemistry and went on to IJSO during high school, but I left that path to just help businesses, get to know and travel the world). I wholeheartedly believe that humanizing AI and setting up social safety nets is the way to go and I love what you guys are doing with Synthminds. I might get back into neuroscience like I originally wanted to :P
Basically, he wants us to learn more about AI, get used to it, and buy GPUs to run it.
I totally disagree with this and with NVIDIA CEO advice. You don't see the beauty of it neither the future of it. Everybody can write, but writing doesn't make you a writer. Or, are you saying that having a calculator makes you a mathematician?
Engineering means .. to simplify any thing .. and easily usable and understandable..
@@dolphin9226 Engineering means “given this tools, solve this problem”.
Your example of Writing or Calculator is based on the fact that the Tool itself cannot do critical thinking. But that's about to change.
She has taken it out of context to promote her own product.
If you were studying the crypto space you’d understand that real industry explosion comes from the concept of “mass adoption.” And it pertains to AI specifically, a decentralized AI space is impossible if only a small percentage of the population can generate, develop, and maintenance them. Literally. It would just be monopolies/corporations all over again rather than being a decentralized ecosystem. Don’t let your love for building the system, make you forget about what’s much more important: the improvements the system can make to everyone’s quality of life. Everyone deserves to be able to take matters into their own hands if they choose to and create whatever they please as long as it doesn’t harm anyone, harm anyone’s property, or be invasive into other’s privacy. And honestly, we need to merge these 2 stances. Of course people should only have the skills they developed through discipline but it would be great to allow the average person to be able to do as much as they can even if they’ve been around a lot of technology before in their life. There is a lot people shouldn’t be limited from just because they didn’t focus on becoming a programmer.
1:51 Everyone is a programmer
2:21 Technologist
3:16 Copilot
4:34 Sam Altman
6:17 Neurolink Chip
8:53 Life Sciences
9:36 Life Science to Life Engineering
9:54 Albert Einstein College
I have just started using copilot to assist me with my programming, and it's most useful contribution so far is trying it's best to get .Net Maui to actually work. So far neither of us have succeeded, but it is great to have an assistant. Prompts like translate that android java to c#, or what file action am I supposed to give that file have produced surprisingly helpful results. I think understanding code makes the whole process a lot more efficient though. Plus converting ideas or instructions in my mind to natural language can be less efficient than actually doing it directly myself. Maybe when Elon Musk's idea of mind to AI is realized we wont need to write code anymore, draw artwork, or compose music, but until then I think it is still useful.
I love to believe that core human curiosity driven skills will never disappear but evolve. If you tell 2 year old to stop doodling or solving puzzles because it is inefficient and AI will do it better, the kid will only look at you weird and do it anyway. Same as painters never stopped painting, or people never stop playing games and solving riddles. Things evolve but fundamental principles remain. Humans will want to solve problems in a creative way. Now, the question is how we do it and what tools we use.
Thanks for comment, it’s very useful to hear how people use AI.
I am kind of a programmer myself. What I know after 20 years of programming, coding doesn't make you happy. It definitively put food on the table but don't feed your brain with repetitive tasks AI will do better than you. If we continue following this technical path, IMO the best thing to learn is how to build, develop and program robots. The future of the humanity lays there.
But in my entourage the happiest people are the one dealing the less with computers, robots etc, the happiest people are the one helping other humans or working outside.
I am glad that you added the victory sound in the background, kudos to all who felt the real struggle and discovery of human secrets you are envisioning.
Happy to be here with you all sapiens and living beings.
Thankyou
Thank you so much for this edit, really appreciate it. Thank you
Hilarious. They told us all along thatAI won’t replace high level coding when we asked if programming will be replaced with natural language prompts to build what we want. Specialization will die and we will all be minimum wage nobodies.
I come from a mechanical engineering background, and for the past 6 months, I have learned Python from prompting Chat GPT and Gemini. Now I have an opportunity with a recruiting agency to start entry level software roles. However, I am questioning the value of this and wonder if I'd be better off using these skills for myself and building low/no-code tools as a business enterprise. What ways are you using these tools in your business, Goda?
That would be a good start,because the door is about to be swung wide open & competition will increase.
you could do both until your side-gig takes off.
be careful while learning things you don't know from ai. they can you give you wrong answers in a very convincing way
Don’t waste this little passion of yours on mofos! I did for 7 years, it was totally wrong and made me a “I’m still learning, im not ready to do it on my own” junkie.
Do it for yourself and everyday you can get tons of happy hormones by making progress on your thing. Guys at the job will search for replacement if you get sick for 3+ days, guaranteed.
@mrthug101 You are right. You would be just as right if you said the same thing about old textbooks and teachers who aren't learners. That doesn't mean I give up on textbooks or teachers. I do recognize ChatGPT and others as great educational tools and as being nearly able to carry on a conversation on a topic of no interest to my friends.
duuuuuude, you have my gratatude!!!
I have completly lost it when I heard the Jensen Huang's speech about AI and programming.
Now BACK TO WORK.
GO! GO! GO00000000001
The rule is this:Pick an advice of a big tech CEO and do the opposite.
Wonderful video !! This 70 yo man grew up with a Grollier's OUR WONDERFUL WORLD Encyclopedia that had a wonderful index to help you find anything in the 17 volume encyclopedia. I would come home from school and dive into any volume and leaf through it till I went through the entire set of books. When elder sibling tried to assert that he knew how many Karats made pure gold; I simply looked it up and put the issue to rest. This helped tremendously with doing legal research in law school using word search strings to find an issue. But before I got a law degree I got a teaching degree. I was an Industrial Arts teacher. This topic is hugely important. I hope it does not do away with the pleasure of using a table saw to turn a few boards into attractive useful things. Throwing a clay pot can be huge fun. Making special hardware out of leather goes back to indian technology. To lose those technologies due to this wonderful expedient may facilitate life; let's don't let it take the fun out of work-life.
It will be a nightmare to resolve bugs caused by ai generated code(especially if you don't know the underlying programming language). It's just that Nvidia wants more money from investors.
Learning how to code is very important because it teaches you how to think. Coding is more than just a set of instruction for the computer to follow. The skill that you develop when coding is on how to think and this skill of how to think will not only be applied in programming itself but other aspect of technology and engineering as well. So learn how to code and AI should be there to teach you how to code better, just like it would in any other profession.
No brainer. Semiconductor and AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I have made more than 200% ROI from NVIDIA with the assistance of my fa, I won’t fail to mention. I agree the stock would go higher in the next couple of days.
That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trend that is difficult for the untrained eyes to see. I have made more than 350% through semiconductor stocks under my estate planner(fa) by alternative investing. The portfolio comes with perks as well in terms of travel and liquidity.
One of my goals is to employ the service of a financial advisor this year. I've seen some off LinkedIn but wasn't able to get a response. Could you recommend who it is you work with?
The decision on when to pick an Adviser is a very personal one. I take guidance from 'Karen Leigh Owens'. to meet my growth goals and avoid mistakes, she's well-qualified and her page can be easily found on the net.
HAHA this comment aged like milk 🤡 Clowns going deep diving 🤡
@@TiredBushIt's a scam thread.
One question please! Is NVIDIA a safe buy to outperform the market this year? I'm tired of these new buys every week, just to make up some assets with low percentage on my $236k portfolio and try to keep everything around 10%.
Yes, but do your own research. Avoid index funds, mutual funds, or specific stocks for now. Consider 5% fixed incomes as a safer option. Alternatively, consider hiring or working with a good market strategist for added safety.
Took control of my portfolio, faced losses in 2022. Seeking change, consulted a fiduciary advisor. Restructured and diversified with dividend stocks, ETFs, Mutual funds, and REITs. Portfolio surged to $610k with an annualized gain of 28%.
Your advsor must be really good, how I can get in touch with them as my porfolio isnt doing well.
Monica Shawn Marti is the licensed coach I use. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I appreciate it. After searching her name online and reviewing her credentials, I'm quite impressed. I've contacted her as I could use all the help I can get. A call has been scheduled.
I remember drawing on the back of my exam sheet back then in 2008, a conversation between a girl and GLaDOS (Portal was the craze back then). She asked GLaDOS to code the exam questions for her. Needless to say, I failed that exam.
16 years later, a moment that I knew exactly will happen finally happens.
At first the idea of NOT learning things like programing sounds good but it belies the need to customize and get under the hood of things and assumes that people have the depth of understanding to create on that level...most don't...
This reminds me of learning to play music but not wanting to learn theory. You are NOT better or more creative at something that you don't understand. You don't speak a language well because you only know a few words...the ability to create and break rules means you generally need to KNOW the rules SO you can "break" them...
You got the exact point right - to build anything great, you have to understand the problem first. This Jensen spoke more about domain expertise importance than coding skill alone. Learn chemistry, combine it with coding which will be interesting and now we can build something. But if everyone only learns to code who is going to build next medicine.
I just solved a mathematical problem that I've studied for 18 years.
With 20 years of focus anyone of us can transform the world. But few have the ability to focus for so long. Why? Because people do not know how to actualize today the long term value that will come in 20 years. But it's actually trivial to do. I called DPF: deliberate practice in flow.
I believe we shouldn't focus on what to study but we should teach our children on how to study to continuously grow their enthusiasm. DPF does exactly that.
Each person should increase his/her enthusiasm by focusing on something hard AND exciting. The hard part guarantee value, the exciting guarantee the perseverance needed to learn enough about the subject to benefit humanity in the long term.
Overall, just great! It gives a direction of where to focus on!
Thanks for doing this work for all of us!
The last part ist just getting under my skin. The music just gave me small goosebumps 😁
don't trust rich people , trust employees of the rich people because they work for the rich people
"Don't learn to code, let us do it." I approve this message 👍 Let those of us who know what they are doing do it, and the rest can call themselves prompt engineers. 🤣
well, it is a dangerous approval, after us we need a new batch of developers. So no! I don't approve this message. Learn the code learn the AI, and know when you should and should not use it. It has limited usage neveretheless this limited scope can aid your productivity.
@@arcomarco7131 Mr. Play It Safe was afraid to fly
He packed his suitcase and kissed his kids goodbye
He waited his whole damn life to take that flight
And as the plane crashed down, he thought
"Well, isn't this nice?"
We cannot beat the AI machine that is armed with trillions of transistors on it.
Well there's nothing wrong with being a Prompt Engineer. People just want to make a living.
@@user-um7tw6kx4r6 I approve this message 👍
Goda Go, this video is so very important and so, Thank You. Correct AI use brings human creativity closer to creating. I can't think of how to say it more simply. Creativity to Creating. So, it's inaccurate to say AI will displace a person - rather, it should allow a person to work in new ways. Using original thought will comprise most of the working day - imagine that. Years ago, I began a personal project to automate all process engineering dimensions for any desired goal/set of requirements. I could see the framework in my mind.
Now, either myself or my successors can achieve the vision that was beyond the tools and time I had in the past. Makes me excited to imagine what we will achieve. Thank You
This sort of technology has both its potential beneficial uses, as well as its severe dangers. I think the question more people should be asking, is not "is AI technology good or bad" but rather, "is humanity ready for this type of technology?" -- and if we look around at the general state of the world and how people act towards each other, I would say that the answer is a resounding NO. But ready or not, here it comes. And we're going to have to deal with the repercussions of this, whether we like it or not.
I got a bachelor's degree in computer science, and i'm well versed in programming.
The downside of all that Jensen Talking about is CENSORSHIP. What guarantee does one have that this technology will not be eventually become seclusive and exclusive to a few individuals. People around the world are familiar with the USA's SANCTIONS, they can decide one day to pull the plug on countries that don't use the US DOLLAR as currency.
What Jensen is suggesting is very dangerous. It can lead to loss of general knowledge of coding and in future a total AI dependance because no one will understand the code AI spits out.
What would you choose - 100k people who understand code that AI spits out, or 100k people who know how to use AI to cure cancer? I think it is a fundamental question here where our focus goes in the future. If coding is getting easier, we don't need biggest volume of the same, we need couple really good, and other who know basics. But if I could I would pour focus in 100k people who know how to control AI (basic code, assisted coding) but also have domain knowledge to work on problems we all want to solve.
@@godago Plenty registered doctors claim to have found the "cures" and any "cure" that does not benefit the big companies will it be accepted?. There are still more people with domain knowledge and creating their own AI. People easily learn to code and AI math and their own domain knowledge they can create far much better solution than someone who tells a closed AI to create stuff. It will become apparent in the future just as people said we have explorer ,word and excel no need for other software.The best domain solutions will be created TODAY or in the future by people who can proficiently code and know their specific domain knowledge+ can create their own AI.Please note if you have basic math knowledge you can create your own language model + learn to code from 3 books each with 400 pages or all in one book with 1200pages.Point I am saying people can learn to code and create AI and still know their own knowledge any professional in any science program has had more than 50 books learning code and AI is just a small worthwhile task to learn.Never listen to people selling AI telling you not to learn to create AI,food producers telling you not have your own garden you must just learn to cook and new recipes !!
You are not a good programmer miss. I have seen all your replies. This word this man is talking is utopia.
The problem you are not even a scientist, I understand beside programming you don't even know any scientific field. And this is the problem, people who are only good at some kinf of engineering in technology, think they have all answers to this world.
You are talking about cancer, you would rather like 100k people who can cure cancer with ai. Look stupid this way of thinking is? The French were first to discover anti viral treatment for hiv without ai, Fleming discovered penicillin without ai, Jonas salk discovered anti polio vaccin. What I'm trying to tell you is your problem is to think, moral person like Nvidia, Microsoft, Facebook, Google will save the world, crisis(wealth, health, diseases, natural catastrophs) this is false. I gonna tell you where imagination goes mathematical and complex structures are limited and it when imagination take ideas that follows universe laws and give them an equation and formula.
Avoid modelization, but embrace imagination this where knowledge came
@@godago if coding get easier, maybe there will be so much new business to do with it, that there will be needed even more software engineers to create them, software engineer is so much than just code. People is free to chose whatever they want to learn or do in their life. i think AI now is all about business and money, now there is a race, everyone is creating their own AI and in a free world everyone should be able to create one, not just be a consumer of the AI that some company made and you have to pay a month subscription, and at the moment is all about that. the race is about the money, sorry my english im from Peru, greetings
@@godagofalse dichotomy. besides you think i cant fucking write shit so that a black box will give me an answer? i call bs
ur one of my new fav youtuber in AI space, very humble, also explore the possibility of making 2 minute news express type of videos!
And we need people who will fight for the right to live non-digitized lives. Humans are not machines and we need freedom from controlling bureaucracy. Population expansion issues are a temporary problem, and we need people who will continue to nurture and protect our reserves of natural ecosystems and human knowledge of living simply and in harmony with nature.
Iam with you.
I'll start a movement against AI.
As someone who's always been fascinated by AI, I find it amazing how tools like SmythOS are making collaborative AI accessible to businesses of all sizes.
The best way to work with ai is probably by using a conversation and not just one prompt.
100% we all it banter and it stands for B in our SCRIBE prompting method. If you have time, check it on the channel. It's all about collaborating with AI. And most of our prompts are meta- prompt so that ai collect info by asking questions, prompts itself, call nessadary agents or develops them and collaborates with you on your problem. Google Prof Synapse for this experience in chathpt.
Great perspective and thought provoking views by J.Huang about AI💻💯
I start to feel that most of the AI bros who tell you to stop learning programming are just trying to beat the competition in a tighter job market. All of these people have a personal agenda. Critical thinking is probably the most useful skill out there to avoid being manipulated by online gurus.
Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video. I have found it illuminating.
I foresee an even larger gap between the people wanting to get into computer science and those who are already very experienced as engineers.
AI is promising to perform all of the rudimentary coding work. Which leaves the hard tasks of designing complex systems to the already existing senior professionals. There was already a bias against hiring and training up junior software professionals, but now there is AI to compete with them as well.
This is causing a brain drain as senior professionals are retiring, or unwilling to move around due to already being hired with a sweet gig. There are not enough truly senior level engineers available (I'm not talking about the fake, inflated titles of some engineers). We aren't teaching a new generation to have the underlying knowledge and experience to make wise decisions with AI. We just have lots of CEO's telling us "don't learn to code, AI will do that".
It's not enough to just have AI capable of coding, we need educated professionals who know how, why, and what to tell the AI to build. Without that, egregious and horrifying mistakes will be made and we will see AI do some very bad things.
Nah, there will always be some nolife aspiring to become that senior. All this will do is shift smart people to physical labor and make even more problems to find a job
I am pre-AI. So, now I see I am being replaced. I got ChatGPT to verbally chat with me. Thank you Goda Go for your YT content.
Graphical user interface has replaced command line interface which was very hard for some people. Everyone including children become command expert when gui took over the world. Now ai, promt engineering is fast replacing coding. Also welcome to new tech like no code/low code.
Isnt the ai and promt engeneering is just most highest level of coding language.
I would like to say to traditionalists who say ai will never replaced coding that there is no need for acting like thier feeling are hurt. Fact doesn't care about one's feelings. Beacuse if you look back at history paper replaced tablets ink replaced tablet carving ,and pen replaced feather, fountain pen replace pen, ball pen and pencil replaced both ink and fountain pen, typewriter tool place of writing by hand itslef, computers took over the place of typewriters,voice command took over, mind command will took over..
For the code lover i would like to say coding isn't going to go anywhere after it will be replaced. It will be be here and stay here it just not will be widely used same as we now dont widely use pen and typewriters but they still exist.
you're doing the real research and providing the value. Thank you!
People don't understand how SCARY a world where only AI can code is. Everything depends on code nowadays. If nobody can do it, one big mistake from the AI can send us back centuries. And it WILL make mistakes. But that scenario is unrealistic so whatever.
There is an even more interesting logic: in a world where AI is good enough to program on it's own the entire product, it would essentially be at the level of AGI (and a very advanced one too) because programming is one of the hardest human endeavors. And in that kind of world everything will be made by AI. If programming can be automated, anything can. So by learning programming you are entering a flowchart scenario with only 2 branches: either your skill is still heavily needed or the entire world requires no skills of any kind at which point you shouldn't have bothered with any other skill anyway. It is truly the safest career path possible. (Unless you are a shit programmer, of course :D )
And in the scenario where the programmer is using AI tools to speed up the process (the most realistic one) - you still need to be a full programmer...
True
I agree. The world people see in which AI has the capacity to program everything? It wouldn’t only be software engineers that would be out of a job, most definitely!
your whole comment shows a grave ignorance. you mistake programming with coding. in that, huang is only saying you don't need to focus on learning a programming language, just on how to solve the problem needed to have software provide solutions. programming is still being done by the human, even if these AI bots are doing the writing. it's akin to scribes in ancient egypt. the human will still need to understand how to have algorithms solve the problems.
your entire premise falls apart in the very 1st sentence. fyi something similar to bots being able to code has already happened in the past. when we stopped writing machine code or very low level languages to use high level language abstractions with compilers, it was exactly the same kind of step. programmers were still doing the same solutions, just writing them much more easier and closer to natural english.
@@00101001000000110011 Your comparison to compilers and AI is not very strong. We trust compilers because we can verify with absolute certainty the correctness of the translated machine code back to the high level language. My C++ program will spit out the exact same machine code no matter how many times I compile it on my computer and there is no room for variation. Its a one to one translation. If I can trust my C++ code, I can trust the machine code without having to verify myself. If I give Chat GPT a prompt to write me a program to solve a problem, and ask it the same thing over and over again. It's possible and high likely each solution will be different from the last. It's a one to many translation. The solutions may work, but how can I trust these solutions won't have unintended consequences? There is room for the LLM to include unexpected behavior in one solution, meanwhile not in the other. The only real way would be for me to sit down and review the code it gives back to me. Imagine writing a program and then having to verify the machine code is correct by reading it yourself.
@@00101001000000110011 you seem knowledgeable can you teach me more on this or recommendations? I wanted to learn but most stuffs about AI is like written for marketing only no real substance
There are more than a thousand jobs offer for skilled software engineer on nvidia website.
Finally, it looks like we still need them.
CEO who have never coded advising students note to code. Role of CEO is market their new product, not to advise.
well pointed
I think what Jensen meant was don't learn programming for the purpose of it being your profession. He didn't follow up with the positives I'm sure due to time constraints and the loss of focus of his overall message. Prompt Engineering is incredibly important. It is the details we include that creates the right question. It is providing an expectation to an unknown answer. It is the art of digital focus. While 2023 allowed those willing to bleed a little to learn about A.I. 2024 will produce tools to prevent such fatigue. I don't regret the bleed, but look forward to the tools that permit my ideas a suitable canvas so I can focus on helping those in need.
You got it! Everyone can code now, so reality is it is a skill not a profession.
@@godago "it is a skill not a profession" can be said about almost anything humans do
Then who will develope new things for AI. If we study biology.
It is essential to understand how things work from the bottom up. Gaps in knowledge create opportunities for control through obfuscation.
They want to sell their GPUs
like it or not - coding today's becoming so much more easier - time saving - and more productivity. I'm very much thankful to AI that's getting better day after day
He says not to learn to code, yet he hires numerous programmers to develop his product. This seems a bit hypocritical. If that's the case, he could simply fire all the engineers in his company and implement everything using AI. I don’t think that would be feasible
It seems to me that you are under the false impression that coders and engineers are the same thing. That is not true. It’s true that most engineers start out as coders, yes, but lots of engineers don’t do much coding themselves; instead, they oversee coders and guide their work at a high level.
When people have to do the coding, an engineer who knows how to code is typically best; but since AI is moving to being the coder, it will become increasingly true that the engineer will not need to show coders what to do when they are lost.
@@theronald2350 I agree that there's a distinction between coders and engineers. A coder without a deeper understanding of the problems they’re solving often isn't equipped to take on engineering responsibilities. However, there is overlap because, technically, coders apply engineering principles to tackle specific problems. That said, engineers typically oversee the design and structure of solutions at a high level, beyond just the coding phase.
While AI is evolving fast, it's currently more of an advanced search tool that provides snippets or suggestions based on available data. AI’s contributions are helpful, but it's far from replacing the strategic and analytical thinking that engineers bring to the table. For now, and for the foreseeable future, human engineers will remain crucial in ensuring that solutions are effective, scalable, and safe.
Finally, I find it misleading when companies use 'learning to code' as a marketing tactic to promote AI products. Whether in hardware or software, it’s essential to master both engineering and coding skills to solve the critical problems of our time. If AI can assist us in doing that, great-but that's all it should be: a helpful tool, not a replacement for genuine engineering expertise
Watching you in that video made me realize what an amazing role model you are. Your confidence and strength really shine through in an empowering way:)
Why even to learn prompting when chatgpt can list all the prompts according to your requirements...
What’s the prompt to get it to list all the prompts?
@@haveaniceday7950 now what you have asked to me, ask to chatgpt without even changing any word, it will give all types of prompts later u can prompt according to ur requirements from that list
@@haveaniceday7950 same question what u have asked me which is also a prompt, ask to chatgpt, it will give all the prompts
If you listen to these people, your successive generations will regret it.
I distinctly remember this same opinion being floated 20yrs ago.
Notice who listened and stopped, handing full control to those who didn't...
The consumer.
Pay attention...it was pretty evident this was taking clear shape when not only have they removed handwriting practice as a requirement in K-12, but a child can be a 10th grader with kindergarten chicken scratch on every assignment and still clock a 3+ GPA.
This is by design.
Never take advice from AI junkies.
the answer: 8:28 min, study digital biology ;)
Exactly!
I am not a coder. But I do understand coders will always be needed. For who is going to help out if an app or website, a platform, a marketplace, a database is laggy, suddenly hacked, out of service? A coder!
Not only a coder but also a statistician/ mathematician…..better will be,having both sides of knowledge,then come the domain expertise
Yes but consider how many people will be displaced, also not so much because they could just write binary code or machine code if they wanted to, no need for human readability
Calculators did not remove Math teachers so why to fear
what a bullsh* comparison..
No such comparison
This video has taught me that people seriously underestimate the gravity of coming events. They're trying to compartmentalize AI agents and AGI like it's just a product, and not realizing how pervasive it is to the point where nothing involving labor and skill is needed (no not even prompts) that AGI could not itself do far better. Once Perceive -> Reason -> Decide -> Act human processes can be simulated by AGI what can a human possibly do. Skilled jobs will be the first to go, hardware jobs will be the last as robots need to be economical en masse but perhaps AGI will figure that out. Mass unemployment is inevitable, within 2 years. The world economy is radically going to change, we'll be talking about UBI. I had a guy tell me to learn deployment as THAT will be the best job...why wouldn't AGI be the best at a skill like deployment too, far better than a human at figuring out how to deploy AI software and infra.
Dont code so only a few people can rule the world with an iron fist. 🤣
Thanks for sharing ma'am. While i understand what the CEO means, i still believe in the principle of basics and logic ideation on code. There is some sense of satisfaction when you put your own idea down. The future AI assistance is highly welcome too 💯🙏🏽
1-Stop hyping this prompt engineering stuff. Just talk with the AI like your regular life chats.
2-Yes, coding and programming will be useless and will be over, but it's all about time. Coding didn't even exist until the 1950s, so of course, it will end. But you know what else will end? Surgeries, nutritionists. Every job will change; every job was already changing. And it is not an instant change, like on 25th April 2026, all programming languages will be shut down. :) There is nothing like that. But it is not hard to see that the usage of programming languages for developing software will decrease because of the creation skills of AI, and at one point, it all will be over slowly. These are my takes.
You have everthing right except for the "slowly" part. It's happening exponentially.
Jensen Huang is the CEO of NVIDIA, ie, the #1 sales person for a mega company. He is doing what he is supposed to do... help sell more NVIDIA product. What else would you expect him to say? In reality, GenAI will affect all aspects of software development not just coding (why people are fixated on coding is beyond me). Will there be a small slice of app dev that can be addressed with "no-code"? Sure, of course. We have trivially easy web tools that allow non-programmers to create web sites now. It took 20 years for that to happen. A similar pattern will happen with GenAI.
yes, he said that. He does what every CEO does: feed the hype and hope his shares will rise even higher this year. What AI will do is to make programmers much more productive. Learn programming. Learn computer science. The future will be even more exciting than ever before.
Love how you explain blockchain technology; it's such an important topic.
Learning to code is not just to write a program, but to systematically organize your logic thinking. Math and coding will never disappear.
will be only different
the innovative approach Aliagents is taking with tokenized AI agents is seriously next level