Start the FREE Software Development Introduction Course with CourseCareers Now: coursecareers.com/a/TinaHaung?course=software-dev-fundamentals This is a HIGHLY experimental exercise. Please be aware that this may be wildly inaccurate so PLEASE don’t freak out and take things too seriously. Feel free to leave your opinions below and point out things that maybe I missed but please don't come after me k I have feelings too 🥺
Artificial intelligence is going to replace every job, people changing career won't help. Maybe AI can't do the jobs now, but In 5 years artificial intelligence will have every job. Artificial intelligence is smarter and better than us. So stop lying.
Thank you for such a well researched video. Extremely helpful. Sorry for any haters - remember: some people will never be happy, and can always find things to complain about. You don't have to appease them, because they work hard not to be appeased.
To those why say "my job is safe, becaue AI or robotics won't be able to replace it any timr soon", keep in mind that you'll be competing against all those who did lose their jobs.
True, but I wouldn’t worry about that. Competition will always be a factor and it’s been to get started now learning and becoming valuable then to not get started and wait until everyone else is in same position as you with zero experience. Get the experience now while you can.
@@CristianGarcia-jc5khone thing you will learn if you become a boss is you get what you pay for. It’s often better to pay a little extra especially when it comes to employees.
But I have a 5-year headstart on those people and industry experience. They're going to be learning an entirely new field from the start. So good luck to them.
@@nikkibee187 Unfortunately your 5 year head start means zilch, especially in the long run. Plus, do you think millions of people are just gonna sit by, starving? The entire global economy is shifts, but Nikki has job security. Being selfish is no excuse for being stupid.
As much as I don’t like politicians, I would fear robot politicians even more. Just take the most utilitarian approach even if it means pulling a Thanos 😂😬
No one will want a robot consoling them while they are dying. The immense outrage that will cause companies who decide to go through with that... Phew. All I gotta say is that they'd be brave to try. Inhumane and immoral, even.@@pravin4266
You are not useless. This world is just run by greed fed monsters. Your strength lies with others. Search for groups that share your feelings/experience and see how you can either unionize or plan how you can act as a group.
Rebel. Pick up a weapon and let’s organize against this technology like the Luddites. Actually, EXACTLY like the Luddites. They didn’t hate technology in general, they hated that technology taking their only job.
Im 16, and I want to become an artist. I don't think people realize how depressing it is to know that you won't even have a chance to make a living out of art even before you try. I hate this shitty world
I'm sorry for your loss. I was actually learning to be an artist (graphic design bachelors degree) and also worked on some cathedral walls (actual paint and ornaments and stuff) but then, when I was 23-24 I though "man this shit is difficult" - I've had so many people do stuff better than me - I just thought I need to change. Anyway, a bunch of jobs later, I found myself in I.T. Man am I glad that I did switch. And no, I don't feel bad for all the years I've invested in art - it was my life, I was happy at the time doing it - until I wasn't Anyway, I WILL NOW GET TO THE POINT Yes, definitely, art is outdated and overrated - it may seem depressing at first, but that's just the reality of it, try your best to try out other fields - its not the end of the world - you are a human and not a machine after all - you are much better at adapting then you think
With or without AI, art is a terrible choice. It is one of the lowest paid degrees period, and will most likely end in you working at Starbucks or retail.
As a software developer who has been unemployed for the last 8 months (I've never had a job search take more than a couple of months), I would NOT recommend transitioning into dev, especially web dev. Maybe ML engineering is a safer bet, but the market is currently flooded with candidates in web development. And I do think software development is at high risk of AI simply because AI coding tools have already been widely adopted. It won't replace all software developers but it will make developers more efficient so fewer will be doing more.
The problem right now is not in AI but in economics crisis, so big guys don' invest in startups as much as in 2021 and 2022. That's why there is a lot less projects than before.
Same experience. No one is hiring software engineers and I see why. I also don't think that AI Experts are safe GPT can program neural nets and even though they are not of great quality and can't see why that souldn't be the case a few years from now
Yeah, this is terrifying to me too. I've been pivoting to game dev from 3D animation (long time graphics programmer, then had a family) and I'm quite nervous. I do agree that integrating AI into what I'm doing is probably the best course. I don't want to make a game, but (get paid to) help others make their own games. And also...educating people who want to make a game.
we are getting very close to the time the great depression started 100 years ago, ending around the 30s. i think it's about to happen again with these jobs being taken away
You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Please look up why the great depression happened. This is closer to the Industrial Revolution. A lot of jobs will be lost in turn creating new jobs that require more advanced set of skills. It's a double edged sword.
AI has been around for decades now. It's only recently that people care about it. So too late. They should have cried when they had a chance to change it's momentum.
U mean the stakeholders get to decide. Rarely does customer dissatisfaction with automated A.I. systems actually change the decision made at the top, since every other company is also automating. There no choice but to automate.
I really hope teachers won't get replaced, I'm not a teacher but as a woman who wants to be a mother someday, I want my kids to have a real life and experiences
That should be the goal of teachers. Give human experience and emphasize its importance to the youth. Tell them why we should not rely on numbers, codes, statistics alone but in human experience and the soul.
I think the role will evolve. AI can probably teach better and be customised to each child’s abilities but the human teacher’s role will be more to assess the student holistically and on emotional development. Think positive 😊
@@oli9220 I don’t think AI should figure into any emotional metric. That’s a decision for schools to make. Think about it differently - like a teacher is trying to teach a subject to a classroom of students with different learning styles. Instead of spending all the time actually conveying knowledge and giving lectures, AI does that part - but on a one to one level. The teacher then is tasked with going around the classroom, talking to the students, checking in on whether they’re learning the new material and then making adjustments for each child. Way more human connection in this case than making a whole class pay attention and not having enough time for actual interaction with the students on an individual basis. And the class would be split into half AI learning, and then half interactive sharing with the class on what they’ve learnt and actual discussion. No more homework (since they can all just use AI to find answers anyway) and way more interaction with the teacher and fellow classmates. I’m talking primary school level and up, not kindergarten or pre school. Would be much better than what we have currently and I would love for my child to learn like that.
THIS! You aren't following your passion anymore, you're just watching as someone else does your passion for you. It's not your art anymore. Plus, why would someone else pay you to type in an AI prompt when they can do it themselves? I'm really scared for art as a whole, since I see no way to avoid the AI takeover.
Nah fr😭pissed me off so bad i hate how ignorant ppl are about this shit like bro ai “art” is whats gonna take my job why on earth would i resort to using that hideos slop😐😐
Maybe not aircraft (yet) because of their tight performance requirements but cars will likely become increasingly modularised to allow for automated component replacement (probably a fair way off though, so you've got a decade or so ... maybe).
Maintenance jobs require not only versatility of a human body, but also human deduction and problem solving skills for troubleshooting, which are still hard or almost impossible for a machine to do efficiently. For aircraft maintenance you would need dozens or even hundreds of different robots for different maintenance tasks, all of which will have to be certified, tested, maintained, upgraded and ultimately discarded as new aircrafts with different needs emerge, so, a mechanic or engineer will have his job for decades, if for nothing else, then because they will be cheaper then 30 or 50 different machines that you would need for each specific aircraft type.
@@jordansprojectsNot because its better design, just purely to take advantage of robotics and even more immense production centralisation. We are already seeing the first modular EV batteries that can be swapped out of cars in minutes.
I started out my career as an engineer but moved on to nursing when jobs became scarce in around 08-09 & now in 2024, they’re already rolling out these AI cameras/sensors in patients rooms that are linked up with nurses working from home, it looks so dystopian & patients have been overtly vocal against being in one of these rooms, it’s only been a trial & it’s already a disaster. I don’t think AI will integrate as well as some believe and there will always be a premium on human specific jobs. I personally believe statutory positions such as politicians, clergy, medical professionals & law enforcement, may be AI assisted, but will most certainly remain human.
Years ago, I spent 3 weeks in the hospital because of deep burns. I had very good nurses in the day and some terrible ones at night. I can tell you that I would have preferred nurse androids at night. But AI will eliminate many nurse and doctor jobs by eliminating the underlying reasons for being in the hospital in the first place. Robots will do dangerous jobs so many people won't get injured. AGI will find cures, and finally solve nanobot pending technological breakthroughs leading to advanced nanomedicine using swarm nanobots to fix our bodies. I wouldn't be surprised if all this happens next decade.
@@Nash0303 sadly it will not be about what patients or clients want. If the billionaire owner of a company or the government itself wants to make more money (which they always do) they will replace ad many workers woth machines as possible
My dad in the late 80s was motioned by a friend to study IT and banking. He said him and his class laughed at the guy and all the engineering students said “who the heck would ever bank from a computer…nobody! that’s not happening”. They thought it was a waste of time. He looks back now and thinks “hmm maybe I was wrong”
Won't matter in 5 years if we reach biological immortality timeline, or some other exponential technologies come out rendering them not necessary. (i.e no need for hospitals because everyone has a near agi level robot in their homes with more medical knowledge than any human) and for this it doesn't even take AGI level technology. Just look at all the humanoid companies building them, and tasks they are capable of already. Some can function autonomously. If they are cheaper, better, and can live in your home with you, then they can take care of anyone better than any human can.
@@kevin6447 It's exponential thinking vs linear thinking. Why am I thinking exponentially? Because OpenAI showed a preview of Sora which is a world simulation model capable of not just generating videos but producing simulations of the physics of the real world, and I wasn't expecting that level of (pre-matrix lol) technology for 2-3 years based on the other AI video generation software we have. Some technology shouldn't have been here for a few years. GoogledeepMind used an LLM to solve an impossible math problem with "FunSearch" it used the "hallucinating" that language models have to its advantage finding millions or possible solutions until they found one that actually worked lol then we have GNoME which found 2.2 million new materials. Technology nowadays is helping us discover new things at exponential rates. Then if quantum computers help out it could be even faster. Or even without quantum computers if OpenAI has AGI internally we could see ASI in a much shorter time than you would expect even if the tech is private. Wouldn't be surprised if gpt6 or gpt7 can be prompted to cure diseases. Also we have humanoids that work autonomously and are embodied by those very LLMs, can use humanoids to help with dangerous experiments or there's a plethora of ways to use combined technologies to enhance everything. Also at Harvard they found a way to reverse the age of mice. There's a lot of regenerative therapies that will be accelerated into human trials (some already are) etc
It’s shocking how Women’s Magic Truths on Borlest isn’t being discussed. The book is full of life-changing insights, yet no one seems to notice. Time to break the trance and read it yourself!
watching this and im shakinngg like , being a college student is stressful enough now we are worrying abt ai taking over the jobs .. Can we have a seperate vid abt ai affecting the business field ..
I'm sorry you have to go through this at a young age （ ; ; ） but just remember you won't be alone, and i'm sure you will find something fulfilling in your life even if humans don't need a "job" at some point in the next 2-10 years. When more than 50-60% of jobs are replaced by AI then a new system is definitely implemented so humans can survive. Just remember there will be a way to survive in the future... Just enjoy college and life as much as you can. Things will work out for the best. Hang in there! 🌟
Go into the trades. Until robots can frame a house or build a custom plumbing manifold, then you'll make bank! Once your body gets conditioned, it's smooth sailing
@@JS.SchultzDitto on the plumbing comment. My uncle is a plumber and has had a comfortable lifestyle at least as far back as I can remember. He gets a lot of business and lives in a beautiful house.
You're mixing ideas. Amazon has provided a means for postal services to continue despite letters being largely replaced by email. Postal services pivoted towards parcel delivery.
@@DorkaliciousAF Even with low (pre online shopping) package volume most of the PO's revenue is made from 1st 2nd and 3rd class mail (junk mail). Currently I believe package's make up about 35%. Regardless, because it's a government service and not an actual business the Post office will be around to some extent. We know that consumer trends aren't forever and is not enough to warrant closing up an entity that's been around since the founding of the country. At worst they'd go down to 3 days delivery per week and consolidate routes. I also think there's something to be said about real customer service. People don't like dealing with companies where they can't talk to a real person when they have problems. Who enjoy's a phone tree??
@@DorkaliciousAF I don’t think that he’s mixing things up. I guess he meant “He acknowledges that while email has largely replaced traditional postal services, the individuals once involved in those services were able to adapt and find roles in new technological frontiers, like those offered by companies such as Amazon. The idea is that as technology continues to advance and potentially replace current jobs, it may also create new opportunities that we cannot yet envision like postal service workers could not have foreseen a company like Amazon. So as technology grows, so does the potential for new industries and employment possibilities, ensuring that the workforce will adapt and find new ways to contribute.” in a nutshell.
I've worked in a data centre for over 35 years. Automation was supposed to replace operators 30 years ago in the mainframe environment. Still here and not happening anytime soon. Biggest issue companies have now is in those 30 years they have not trained any younger people and we are all old now and retiring with no replacements. Bad call Big Blue.
Lol at the not happening any time soon. You think just because predictions were wrong 30 years ago that makes current day predictions invalid? Open your eyes, open your ears. Look at the current ai technology and the rate of progress in the past 5 years. It's blatantly obvious your job is not going to be around for another 30 more years.
@@chorko696just for your info google headquarter already uses robots powered by AI to clear their cafeteria, we're already on track for this threat to arrive faster than poeple think
A few weeks ago, I visited a canned tomato factory. They showed us how production works inside, and there were literally only 8 people in a massive 20-meter industrial warehouse. There were just 2 people with forklifts, 3 moving products from one place to another, 1 person monitoring the cameras, and the rest supervising the machines, which were nonstop producing millions of cans. It’s both impressive and terrifying at the same time. But still, it’s not like machines are going to replace people entirely. Machines are incredibly precise, but they lack the adaptability and decision-making ability of a person. They can make mistakes, and when they do, they won’t stop-they’ll keep going, creating a massive snowball effect. A person, on the other hand, can stop, think things through, fix the problem, and then move forward. Moreover, a machine can’t work 24/7 as many people believe. They also overheat, experience wear and tear on their components, and frequently require costly repairs and technical downtime.
One thing I find to always be missing in videos like these, particularly the promotion of 'code camps/courses' is addressing IQ. Some people learn very quickly and have good technical/analytical thinking skills. Others either have a different type of intelligence (kinesthetic like great athletes, emotional like great therapists, etc.) or they simply learn new things quickly while have average analytical ability. If you have neither above average analytics NOR the ability to learn new things like a sponge, you are unlikely to be competitive in technical fields. The pace of change is high. You have to constantly be learning or you're out skilled in just a few years.
Yep, I’m not afraid to say it, I’m not good with learning much. The only thing I’m really good at learning with is… history.. which is useless. Even if I had the money to go to college, I can guarantee you that I will not be able to learn. It will be way too confusing.
While no one with intelligence likes the IMF or the WEF, it is absolutely essential to study their reports. As you correctly pointed out, the quality of analysis is high.
boycott tallow soaps lotions shampoo etc its homonecrobeastiality spending spermm unto a fetus and aborting him is in effect homonecropedophilia oral intercourse after abortion is in effect cannibalism save all microscopicbabies embryothers phitusisters grandadults love God with all heart and soul ♥️
Spot on. As much as I dislike those two organizations because of what they did with developing countries (I come from one, and I know how cold and anti-critic IMF was), and am heavily aware of their biases, I think their reports are worth to read if you supplement them with more genuine research works of academic nature.
IMF and WEF are also made up of the people who have the most control over the subject matter, like them or not (I do not, no one voted for them, and they pull mad strings) their analysis is essential to informing one's self
Just know that AI and Machine Learning Specialists, Business Intelligence Analysts etc at the top. You CANNOT just do a 6-month course and walk into these jobs with zero prior industry experience. These are THE HARDEST profesions to crack into. They're generally populated by individuals who transitioned from previous, closely-related roles with minimum 5-years experience but often more. Most people are completely unaware of this and the ones offering the expensive courses don't tell you this.
Sorry, ml and analytics are most suited for replacements by ai. Both of these are structured and thus. Also, anyone can start these overrated jobs with a days or two training. 6 months is overkill. I have seen most stupid people in ml and analytics. Out of millions there are just few good at very top. Rest are just irritants. I would be happy if they get sacrificed by AI
@@TheSnergglyData Science is different. They usually don't add any ROI, infact they're renowned for being a net loss with 98% of their research. Data Scientists are hired in the good times when profits are soaring and the first to be fired.
@@LeoWolfishthe problem here is hardware is so less invested . Robot's have billions of investments but ai is trillions already .and harder of course u see the result and test it in matter of weeks in software areas but in robotics it might take much longer
Uval Noah Hurari. A futurist/author/historian/paleologist from the University of Tel Aviv, happens to be a cheif advisor to the "world economic forum". He has written extensively concerning how AI will essentially making human participation in the economy obsolete. He's also written about the challenge of dealing with a a planet full of, what he calls, "worthless people" and "useless eaters". His speeches can be found on the internet and are a doozy to listen to. There is reason why drugs are slowly being legalized and it's not for some progressive ideological good like some beleive. Humanity is slowly being strangled by elitists who are intent on shaping the world according their liking and contrary to public good, or representative democracy. We in the public tend to either not care, or try to persue an individual course of action that essentially just involves finding another rat hole that maybe safer than others, but is still a rat hole.
The time when such reports predicting stuff 5-10 years into the future has passed. They can't possibly forecast anything anymore given the pace of AI development.
not only the pace at which it develops but also the fact that the people developing it have an insanely vested interest in pretending that it can do everything
It seems like these reports are only based on what AI can do right now, not what it obviously will be able to to in the next years, which is incredibly stupid.
its funny how there are people doing all these smart things while my biggest achievement in this 2 years was to be able to comment this video in less than hour of its release :/
Being alive is a big achievement too, having fingers if you used those to comment is also nice(if you got em), being able to eat food if you are is also convenient, there's a lot of achievements on smaller scales that we take for granted. But it's still a nice achievement to comment fast on new videos. I sometimes feel the same way btw lol
Being alive isn't big achievement. it's literally a starting baseline to achieve something, which apply to all/most human, if it apply to most humans it isn't big achievement. It's great to be grateful for being alive, but it isn't big achievement by any means especially when you happen to be born in first world country.
I wonder how much the suicide crime and drug use rate will go up.? Will job loss lead to a ludite rebellion ? How much will job loss contribute to a possible civil war? How much will government expenses go up to spend on social programs? Will human trafficking go up? Will the rate of organized gangs go up?
well.. if most people lose their jobs before a UBI is implemented, there is a very, very good chance that there will be revolts happening. Citizens don't want to not be able to live. it'll be bad
@@aileen8492because they want post human future just like they all say in their documents. They want to make human obsolete and get rid of “useless eaters” like Harari said. When I say “they”, I mean WEF, Club of Rome, Bilderberg’s, UN. They are all transhumanist trash who hates us and want to get rid of us since they think they don’t need us anymore since we built for them everything they need to sustain themselves, and that couldn’t be farther from truth.
Tina, common just wow...The summarized information that you provide from actual journal (Which i rarely see youtubers do) is your main skill that forces me to watch your videos. Secondly, your disection of the topic into smaller chunks to clerk level jobs to tech level is amazing. I myself who is in STEM field, is seeking a chance to be at the forefront of AI (in this GREAT RESET) found this video a gem. Keep on providing such quality content, you are creating massive value to the world. Thank you.
Hi Roshan , I am new to AI , I started with Python, finished it. I am doing Andrew Ng beginners basic course on Coursera which I will finish this week . Can you kindly share what to do next
For anyone who reads this, if everyone refuses/boycotts any attempts the big companies make at setting up AI jobs they will not be able to do it. Stand your ground “complain” to all managers that you need a human to do this job or they will lose your business if over 30% do this they will have no choice but to stop their attempts.
You seem to be underestimating how easy it is for big companies to just fire all protesters and hire infinite people in poor countries who are willing to work. I witnessed it first-hand being laid off from a Google vendor. European employees raise concerns? Not a problem, roll out the "we're downsizing due to business needs" while hiring a whole new cohort of remote workers in Bangladesh, India etc for the same positions. I'm talking hundreds, thousands of positions. Boycotting sadly doesn't scare the management nearly enough.
Well in the not too recent past, most companies went from being able to be called for humans to answering by long teleprompting dialogues requiring hours of time. Grocery stores and stores like target now take forever due to self checkout. No one has organized people to stop these tides.
I love this research, well done. 🎉 The only thing I'm not a big fan of is this 4-12 weeks to become a dev, I'm a senior software engineer with almost 10 years in the field. It takes more than 12 weeks just to know what you are doing. The best thing is to get started and do personal projects to start off and try for a dev job that will help you grow. AI is really prominent in software engineering, and a lot of developers will be superseded, but you can focus on AI or similar jobs that will benefit and help you have a longer career. Nothing is guaranteed, especially with AGI around the corner. But I will be optimistic and hope we all thrive.
Hey folk, i am currently learning js, the concern is by the time i learn full stack with good projects (stuff like nextjs, ShadCN, tailwind, docker, kubernetes, CI/CD), genAI, langchain, deep learning stuff, 2026 or 2027 will come, where the hell will my requirement accomodate in the industry, because all these senior engineers by that time (like you) have already replace junior devs, what value will I provide? Pls help, it's infuriating.....
@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg 👋 I understand your concern. To be honest, nobody knows what is going to happen, but that being said, I think learning these skills of programming will help you write code and assess what should be done. The tech stack will not be very important in the future. We will become more like a translator from human desires to code. I really don't think a person who does not do anything of programming will ask chatgpt 5/6/7 to make an Uber app, and it will generate everything. The user will still need to know how to interact with AI to generate the code or tweak it based on the needs of the client. People who wrote programs on punch cards moved to using keyboards instead. This is the next shift instead of typing 1000 lines of code you ask for a bunch of requirements and it generates that code, we adapt it or ask it to change based on the final state we want the program or app. Take a deep breath, and don't panic. We will still need programers. In the meantime, continue learning to program it will be very useful.
@@santicomp thanks for your words, but instead since you got the hold of things, can't you predict that what new demands will be raised by AI in the said timeline (2026,27), or which domain will companies need workers on, so i can assure myself of some security, provided i will also learn mern
@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg maybe the basics javascript a backend language, probably python or go/rust Learn prompting/prompt engineering, and if you want, you can go down the route of AI. But I think the programmers who use AI regularly will be better off than just having languages under your belt. Once you have some experience, you kind of get the hand of most of them, but get deep with a frontend/backend and work with AI as an ally
Well Done Tina! Her analysis was well-designed: she's found a reasonable number of sound sources, interpreted the data wisely. We can argue about her findings in many cases: that's the point of the exercise, to generate conversation. But overall I think she's pretty accurate about what's coming & the job categories likely to be affected most. At least, so far as we can infer at the moment: future forecasts are always somewhat wrong. Learn to tap-dance I started with an arts degree (History) in a major recession, demographically-disadvantaged. No jobs. Had to scramble throughout my career. Been everything from roofer & forklift operator to BI consultant, systems manager to headhunter, so I know what it means to have to tap-dance in the marketplace. That's going to be required of most people now: industry disruption is accelerating. There's no such thing as a safe job. Tina's right: we're going to need to become very adaptive. And she's also right that it's entirely possible for most people. The tools to do so are increasingly available & accessible. Commit to never quit learning. Set a goal, figure out how to get there & get started. Don't be pessimistic or fatalistic Trends are just that: they average out change, but change specific to may be entirely different. Allow for personal circumstances: whatever the overall market does, your circumstances are local & specific to you. Allow for demographics But while demographics at a national level might say one thing (we have way fewer youth; jobs are going begging) demographics in area may say something different. Allow for everyone to guess wrong We may be sideswiped by something no one sees coming. Allow for your own preferences If you're driven to do something, you'll find a way to do it and make it pay. There are still a few blacksmiths & buggy-makers out there. Not many, but a few. Ms. Huang does this well; I'm subscribed.
But what about people who can’t do this ‘tap dance’? What if they aren’t as smart? I’ll be honest, I can hardly learn anything that isn’t history or something like that. Just leave people like me into holes then?? Are we not people too? Do we not deserve to live just because we are not as good as soaking up knowledge as others?
As a social worker I cannot imagine how on Earth could AI do ANY of my job so I'm surprised to see 10:39. Everything I do is about individualized, personal attention and help for variety of people where each person requires vastly different approach to how I help them. Not to mention those with disabilities have to be driven places and physically assisted etc.
I also doubt I’d want help from a robot. That human connection is so crucial to any care given. AI could be a superb support tool, but it shouldn’t be more.
I do agree. However, I also see the replacement of bank clercs with ATMs. Maybe people back then also thought they'd never trust a computer to hand them their money..
I think this dataset might be confusing jobs likely to decline due to AI with jobs likely to decline due to other reasons. In particular, roles more likely to be related to very young people, like childcare workers, social work, etc. are more likely to decline not because of AI but instead because of shrinking birth cohorts (caused by the high cost of living, high cost of raising a child, and later average marriage ages)
I’m about to off myself at 25 because on top of how garbage life has been in general, I can not pick a career path. I can’t do healthcare because I’m just not built for it, and was going to try getting a degree to be a software engineer, only to find out about Deving taking that entire career away very soon. AI is taking EVERYTHING and I just won’t be able to live a decent life not scrounging for scraps and struggling with money forever. Is there ANY damn reason I should not give up over this? AI IS TAKING EVERYTHING AND ANYONE NOT PROFITING ON SOCIAL MEDIA WILL BE DONE FOR
I don’t know your backstory, but I understand how you feel. What has helped me when things just get too stressful and dark, is to take a mental break for a few days(no news/social media) and write down what really scares me and what really stresses me out. On another piece of paper, I write down the things that bring meaning to my life and what I’m passionate about. Whatever you need to do to bring in money for your preferred lifestyle doesn’t have to be your passion or dream job. Find a skill that is in good/high demand that won’t be as impacted by AI and that your mindset is capable of doing as a profession. The steps to attain that skill haven’t been more available. - School - Online Certification - Self -Study Instead of looking for videos on jobs being lost, research jobs being created/in-demand Find 5-10minutes a day to study/research on a skill that’s profitable and gradually increase the study time. That skill will provide money to sustain your basic needs + your personal hobbies/interests/time spent with family and friends I hope this brings some structure to you. You matter.
Gosh I feel you man. I'm 23, also no idea what I can still make of my life. Personally what has helped me is Pessimistic Curiosity. This whole thing is turning into a bad movie but I also kind of want to know where this shitshow leads us in the future. Maybe shit goes down and we go full dystopia, but maybe the government will intervene and put employee protection regulations in place. If this society does end up becoming unlivable, the Escape Button is always there. Just, if we use it now there's no going back, and who knows what we'll miss out on. Maybe this bad movie has a good ending. But if it ends up going down in flames, I wanna be there to see it. Please know that you're not alone in feeling this way. Most of us are facing the same uncertainty, which can be comforting to know. Where all on this sinking ship together. Please know there's people out there who value you. Please know you're not alone. Hope you are well
It makes a lot sense, would love to be able to work on anything related to implementing AI into our workplace and find ways to not just replace people from their jobs but help enhance a better work life and productivity
I don’t know about this honestly. I have a few friends who are software developers and data scientists and they say that they will most likely lose their jobs in the next 5 years because their jobs got so much more efficient with AI that the market won’t need as many people with these skills anymore. I think the future is going to be on old school professions which require in person / physical activities (at least until robotics kick in and we all die). ❤
I agree! Any job with requires hands will be safe. I was a language teacher but have recently transitioned over to running a chain of beauty salons. It will be a long time before people trust a robot to do their nails and inject their faces 😅
Nurses in my country are going on strike because they are being worked to death, overtime, called on their vacation time and on top of that not paid nearly enough for what they do. More young entry level people going into nursing thinking it's a safe job will only drive wages down and competition up, unfortunately.
Have fun, make friends, socialize, learn critical thinking. Find things that are interesting to them and study them think about the biggest issues in the world and aspire to solve them no matter how outrageous.
Join clubs, make connections, attend campus events and get an internship. I went to college but I didn’t join any clubs or make any friends at school. That affected my life greatly. You should flirt, date and interact with a lot of girls on campus. Women are taking over the white collar world and they only want to work around social competent men that make them feel comfortable. This may sound weird, but it’s the truth. I spent so much time on my studies when I really should’ve spent more time interacting with the people around me because these are the people I’m going to work with in corporate America.
Great video! Thank you for posting this! I've been telling everyone to read the IMF and WEF reports. I'm still struggling to understand all of the charts in the IMF paper... but I find "Box 1" (p24) to be particularly interesting.
And…there’s all the jobs that will be effected because of other people out of work. So maybe YOUR job is, “safe,” but if other people spend less money, that impacts your company, so maybe they now have less money for you. We’re all connected and it’s time we realize that. For one: What do people think is going to happen when tons of artists are out of work? Putting less money into the economy? Ripple effect. Greed always wins. At least so far…
As a Massage Therapist, I don't see how AI nor robots can substitute for a human's touch , energy vibe or intuitive spiritual light. I think my career will sustain itself.
As a cosmetologist and a Cortiva dropout these industries are over saturated and it’s a hustle. When I observe people now compared to 20 years ago they are not getting these type of services done. And the people who are are hard to reach. Now if you have been doing this a while and you have retained a clientele that views massages like people view coffee and they are not trying to haggle your service fees, you have nothing to worry about
I still hope there will be a way for artists to make money using their handmade work. Plus I think fields like dance and music will be difficult, because people will still crave that feeling of knowing a humans connecting with them, especially when you consider live shows.
I think live shows aren't as safe as it seems, because they will probably move from "live performance every night" to "recording a video once and then showing holograms endlessly". Sad truth is that the average viewer cares more for the sheer spectacle than for seeing actual people performing, so with the right amount of pyrotechnics, fancy light and projections etc the majority of public will absolutely be satisfied with a full hologram show. 100% live dance performances will become as niche as, say, glass harmonica music performances nowadays. Maybe like 100 people in the whole world will be able to earn any money doing it.
I'll chime in. Laws will be written forcing humans to do particular jobs. For example, pharmacists used to create medication behind the counter, but for the past 30+ years they just dispense pills in a bottle and tell you what's written on the label - they aren't needed but they had influence to ensure laws protected their job. I think most protected jobs are hands on, in tech/science/environmental. I work in all three, hands on with sensors, measurements, calibrating, preparing, data collection, etc. in lab getting "dirty."
@@LilyGazou Will the population drop a lot? Absolutely, absent a LOT of immigration. Which is politically anathema on both left & (especially) the right, in America. So it's unlikely to happen soon. Everywhere 'round the globe where living standards & health care have improved enough to ensure people can expect their kids to live to maturity, they've limited the birth rate, poured limited resources into raising fewer kids - typically just one or two. Peter Zeihan has famously argued this is because of urbanization: "on the farm kids are free labor; in the city they're just expensive pets." Peter's very good at popularizing demography & geopolitics, but he's dead wrong on this. This trend isn't new: humans have, throughout recorded history, done just this. In all times & places, wherever a slice of society - call it the middle- & upper-class - has achieved sufficient living standards to enable them to assume their kids would survive to maturity, they've limited their number to well under the rate of replacement (these days, 2.1 kids). So their population has fallen. It happened in Ancient Greece, in Rome; it's happening in India now. Sure, the Indian population is still surging, but the growth rate of the Indian middle-class has already plummeted. So yeah: the population of all developed nations is in steep decline. With two exceptions, at present. - In Canada we're welcoming 500,000 immigrants annually; also ~30,000 refugees. So far, without breaking sweat. Short-term a manageable burden, an investment. Long-term it drives growth. As a percentage of the existing population it's significant but no greater - still not even a match - for the numbers that came in during the late-1900s & early- to mid-20th Century. And so far, people have followed the rule: leave your squabbles & prejudices where you came from, don't bring them here. We all get along. It works, because it's a new country, and because of a healthy social & political attitude. There's hints though not only of an increase in the number of "republican wanna-be" conservatives being influenced by US media (we're swamped in it) but also of increasing numbers of immigrants who won't follow "the rule" to leave foreign wars & squabbles where they left them. There are Palestinian & Islamic demonstrations - nearly all peaceful for now - in support of Palestinians in Gaza (understandable) but also sometimes displaying support for Hamas. And for a few years now there's been a lot of fund-raising in some Sikh communities for independence movements in Indian, to which the Indian government (or rogue elements within it) appear to have responded with assassinations & attempted killings, in Canada. - In the US the social & political attitude is downright toxic. Immigration is feared & stigmatized, even by recent immigrants: how ironic that the Republican Party (which is currently anything but 'republican') counts amongst it's ballot-box motivated interest groups a sizeable chunk of the Hispanic community. But for now, family sizes & birth rates amongst the Hispanic & Black population are such that the US growth rate is static: not growing, but not shrinking either. That doesn't bode well for the US economy - it suggests stagnation, or very very low growth - but it doesn't mean a shrinking economy either. Everywhere else across the developed world, there's trouble coming. Germany, Italy (in fact the whole EU), Japan & Korea: they're all in free fall. China's worse. And no one's yet figured out how to keep an economy growing when it's population is in decline. As Peter Zeihan is famous for saying (correctly this time): "We don't have an economic model for how that can happen." Developing nations from India to Nigeria, Venezuela to Honduras, all have rapidly growing populations still, because they're poor & underdeveloped. But already their middle classes are displaying plummeting growth rates. The EU has experimented with immigration & refugee influx to keep growing. At present this has backfired, caused huge social & political blow-back. Some of that is attributable to their being long-established nations with strong cultural identities: they're not very accepting of people with a different culture, and have ostracized them, ensuring they end up living in poverty where social problems fester. But TBF there's an equally awkward problem: much of the influx of immigrants and refugees in recent years has been of Muslim people from N Africa & the Middle East, people who's own culture & religion are vehemently opposed to integration. Not all, but that's a verifiable trend. And without a commitment to integration there's reduced incentive for established cultures to provide support, acceptance & tolerance. Intolerance on both sides is evident, and violence in places like Sweden, Germany & France has substantially undermined earlier acceptance. Asian countries won't even entertain immigration in the first place. Asian cultures are unashamedly xenophobic, so Japan & Korea, for instance, aren't about to try to bring in people to offset declining birth rates. So immigration may not be the answer for countries with stagnant or declining populations. And immigration/refugee movements aside, there are mass migrations on the horizon. Sizeable areas of India saw temperatures of 50 degrees for days, perhaps weeks: thousands of people died. In Canada global warming is more of an inconvenience or irritant than a threat to survival, but the North is warming faster than anywhere else on the globe. Within 30 years the glaciers feeding all the river systems of W Canada & W USA will have melted, and the entire western US & Canada will become desert: a dust bowl from the Rockies to the Great Lakes/Mississippi. Think about that. The only amusing irony in that is that most of our climate-change deniers live in that area, and they'll be most affected. But I guess they pump lots of oil in the Arabian desert, so Westerners will continue pumping oil regardless. And demand more subsidies for a failing industry from "lib-tards" on both coasts. Worse is coming: most of N Canada from about 300 mi. north of the US border is muskeg: frozen swamp, a thousand feet of frozen peat moss. As that warms & melts it releases methane. Methane is a much more potent warming influence than CO2. And methane burns: lightening strikes will ignite massive province-sized fires that will burn underground forever, massively increasing further methane release. This cascading effect will drive global warming ever faster. If we don't somehow limit & eventually reverse global warming - soon! - we won't stop it. Vast parts of the planet will become uninhabitable. Meanwhile mass migration is coming. And we won't have the populations to stop either problem. Global population is now expected to peak at 8.5-9 billion, then plummet - fall off a cliff. But that's already happening in developed nations. All the remaining growth is in underdeveloped nations, most of them closer to the equator, and therefore more likely to be catastrophically impacted by warming climate effects.
Pharmacists aren't needed? A pharmacy can't legally operate without a pharmacist present. If an AI gave the wrong prescription away and killed an infant, who would be legally responsible? The company who manufactured the AI? They absolutely wouldn't want to be liable for that because they'd be sued, get the worst reputation and eventually go into bankruptcy. But legally, someone has to be responsible if a mistake like that is made. Pharmacists are needed because they have the knowledge and expertise to take on the legal liability. A pharmacist is there to ensure the patient receives the right medicine, the right dosage, and that it won't cause any health issues if it's taken with their other medication. If a medication could injure you or kill you if you overdose on it, honestly I don't believe anyone would trust an AI with that much responsibility if it was their life or their child's life on the line.
I think that lawyers will have a bright future because of all copyright cases. Data set analyst - don’t know if that job exists but that will be my field.
i think there was this case of a lawyer using for alot of cases ai and got caught, sooo if it worked that much for him that he could do cases with only the ai and quick, it might not be as bright as you say for them, just my 2 cents
Something extra to think about, it's not necessarily whether your job will be impacted that is the only risk, after all we can expect more evolving jobs around ai that will increase the workload in the short term. The other thing to be aware of is how easily displaced workers in other areas can take on your role, particularly at a reduced salary or bringing in advanced skills you don't necessarily have yet. So you may be an excellent teacher with decades of experience, but if your school sees a significant cost saving in replacing you with a parttime worker using AI, or someone with a PhD in your field is being squeezed into your job pool, it's trouble.
correct. I was an IT engineer going into HR replacing their data analyst and HR system analyst because there is no way hr professionals with 20 years of experience can compete with my technical ability and fundamentals to pick up new tech quickly and automate 3 conventional HR persons job.
People make too hasty and childish predictions about the future. Like, yes, AIs will do a lot of jobs that humans normally do. But as long as it is dealing with humans, it will need humans behind it to command, monitor, limit and configure. Machines are like that
Yes but only a few will manage this and the competition will be even more harsh. I hope there is a wave of creating new jobs to replace the ai ones. People need work to eat.
I'm currently a software engineer with a job but if everything goes south I will take my chances with entrepreneurship and start a cat cafe since there aren't many in my country. I do wonder if that would get too repetitive for me, I need brain action to stay motivated. I could develop a mobile game that would give the customer something (perhaps virtual cats, small discounts?) everytime they visit the cafe lol. I wonder if there would be a target group for it, I would definitely go if something like that existed here but that's just me.
large amount of lost jobs increases the number of people who can't afford anything but essentials, and afaik restaurant, cafe and entertainment industries depend on that excess wealth. So my point is, cafes are also risky ventures... it's very important to at least get the shop location nigh perfect, and the mood/product quality afterwards. Not many people will walk far away to smaller cafes or even realize they exist... especially as home-delivery etc. exist in big cities, making it even less necessary for ppl to walk around and explore outside their daily routine. But yea, that's just how I see it. Oh, not saying your dream is impossible, just warning it may be harder than you think.
They also teach in schools "how to act/talk" sorting by categories and giving examples of how to behave well in a organization and treat your employer well. Im saying this because I study in a school that teaches these, I swear sometimes it feels like they are training me to be a good dog. Its terrifying, its always about "how to be the best employee and sell your work" than "live life". I even tried to ask them about **me** having my own store and how to deal with it but like, they didnt answer. They only focus on *being an employee*. Its disgusting.
i’ve been saying that it’ll be people who know how to utilize AI that’d replace people who don’t. like for me i’m into social media theme pages and prioritizing AI with it has helped out
Ai actually is not just a tool like people say . It can make things from scratch. So it will be always the case if the next update will replace u entirely
Yeah, but…. AI is rapidly advancing. What these analyses are essentially saying is “if AI stops progressing today this is the impact it will have over the next x number of years”. AGI could be released tomorrow and these opinions would go out the window. The path between current AI and AGI will likewise reach milestones where AI can displace more jobs. The only constant is change, and none of these “studies” have even attempted to account for technological advances within the time periods being proposed. My prediction: this video will not age well…
I agree so much with you. It is with this same arrogance that people in the tech industry think they are safe when they are at risk as well because they find flaws in the current technology and its inability to perform certain tasks. It is sad they don't take into account technological advancements.
Yea I agree, like when they said AI is gonna replace 300 mill jobs but somehow replace more jobs. But they don’t mention that because it’s AGI it will soon again be able to do those jobs too, thus replacing those jobs soon after they created them. Like a machine learning engineer
so then i have to ask, if all of these ai advancements are heading toward a place where most jobs will be replaced by ai, what is the point in learning anything, getting a degree, or doing anything?
@@-ASTROMAGIC yes, a lot of laymen people (most of the population) will come to that conclusion soon, probably in about 4-5 years. The whole jobs market will end by about 2035. You’ll notice it’ll get harder and harder every year to get a job, AI will become more of the main reason. Right now sending out 2000 applications is the fate of some, well when it gets that hard, sending out 10-20k applications will actually become the new norm. Then it’ll get so hard, people will realize there’s no point to it, there’s might as well be no job market, then at that point UBI will come in, and AI will run the work based economy.
@@obaid5761 A year ago people were laughing about terrible AI art and videos, look at it now, it ramps up exponentially day by day and it will keep going for years
@WorstAbaYT We're still laughing. LLMs are incredibly expensive to train and sustain. Only experienced knowledge workers understand the frustrations of AI hallucinations. Output speed is decreased significantly, most of the time. Wake up and don't be mindless sheep, fooled by every marketing gimmick.
I don't understand one thing. How is it possible that "Software and Applications Developers" is in low risk of replaceable according to this data, although all the people says that software developers will lost their jobs because of AI (12:04)
Cause SWE is harder to replace entirely like other jobs . The problem is swe is very crowded and competitive job rn so every economic problem or AI hype will effect it greatly .
I've been in software QA manual/automation for a few years now and just recently started to take courses on generative AI and machine learning. It'll take me a while, but I'm determined to gain skills and knowledge in this field
And AI cant get a masters in AI? You seem to think you have this all figured out when in fact the original creators of AI had already been 4 steps ahead of you@@user-qd1fd7ei8h
I'm planning to go for ms in aerospace engineering... should I continue that 😂 I don't see any degree and skills are safe from AI 😢 specially tech domain is already in a bad situation
Yes. There's still plenty to discover in that branch of the field. Even if you choose to not pursue that career later, the degree subject commands respect and will set you up well in your chosen path.
Great research! I'd like to add (I might have missed it in the video, a lot of noise around where I am at at the moment watching this) In general. The highest priority to keep in mind in a world of capitalism as a company is money and growth, companies are dependent on growth to survive, with the on-boarding AI companies will have to include both the cheaper (at least for now) AI and their personal (at least initially and a rather long time to come) to stay in the competition. The human tasks in those jobs will incrementally change direction, yes, that is really a no-brainer. Health care and Medicine. It's true that AI will be superior finding new medicines etc, but someone have to give that medicine to the person needing it, and this will be a long process to exchange human interaction giving the medicine to the needing. The same thing goes for general health care, elder care. So here we'll see AI and humans work together, removing the error prone monkey paper work from the humans so they can focus on the humanity part. Tech. As a senior developer myself, we're using AI at my company to bounce ideas with, and we have a strict policy not to copy paste what ever the AI spits out, the reason for this I will point out later down, which also touches the final aspect of AI for any job/career. It also is a perfect tool to learn new things which you might not have dug into previously or just personal knowledge increment or growth. Banking / Finance. With the initial statement, money is the priority, yes, AI will be a huge actor in this sector, not least in the stock market, I guess the human roles here will shift into more supervising and optimization tasks. Responsibility. No jobs, except politics ;) There is a responsibility chain. There's responsibilities that companies expects from their workers, and the clients on the companies etc. AI can not remove the responsibility chain, so laying of human workers in favor of AI may end up with people just quit the job getting to much responsibility they can't count for, which then will bring the companies to earn less making it harder to stay in the game. Cost of AI. Most companies wont have server parks running AI, but will use clouds... Demand and supply will probably make the use of AI gradually more expensive, and that's without any responsibility guaranty. This could actually turn very nasty very abrupt for many companies. So, all in all, the sane way forward is to let the AI evolve and implement it carefully where you will see long term benefits without an increasing risk of things jumping uncontrollably the wrong direction. And my beliefs are that most established companies kind of gonna go that direction.
An insightful exploration and analysis of 'Job' titles/industries. What I'm more curious about is how job skills and job tasks will evolve over time. This is a more challenging problem, but also an opportunity to understand how an industry will change as technologies and services become commercialized. Great advise (16:42) on how to self improve and leverage opportunities.
Arquitects, plumbers, electricians. Framers and carpenters, landscapers, irrigation technicians, chef's, cooks , cleaning and maintenance, apparel, assembly, machinists, farm and Ranch, construction and all manner of management, all these and probably many more are still needed and will never disappear!
I think AGI is being ignored here, any non physical jobs that do not focus on human relationships (architects, designers, software devs, analysts, ..., mainly office jobs) can be eliminated if AGI is developed (provided enough compute is available). AGI could also be combined with robots eliminating all physical labor related jobs. And this is ignoring that AGI can be used to create ASI in which case I really don't know what will happen.
"any non physical jobs that do not focus on human relationships". It's sorta wild to me that people don't think AI will be better at human relationships than humans. I'd expect an AI therapist to be way better than a human therapist in a few years.
I agree that they would be way better, but some people just want other people for certain types of services. Lets take sales, AI sales would do targeted ads really well, and could explain the product and even manipulate it's customers into buying the product but it would miss a certain trust factor that a human sales rep builds up over several weeks to months. I think depending on what is being sold AI will replace the sales rep or AI will not.
@@2007dinand Ah I see. Fair enough. I would definitely agree with everything you said. While I'd prefer the efficient product I know way more people that wouldn't give up a human barber shop lol.
not only that, but with massive unemployment and salaries plummeting in the remaining jobs people wont have money in their pockets, so small businneses will close in the the whole planet, and all this to make rich a few dudes
I still think most creative fields (especially UX design) are safe because the output is often subjective- with objective elements mixed in. This is why mixing code with art skills is so great.
This still gives a very small side of the picture as just because the jobs are not getting replaced doesn't mean their pay will remain same lol Maybe programming isn't replaced but because its going to become so easy, it's supply will increase significantly
I disagree, because a lot of AI's programming side can be quite bad and if you don't have good skills understanding what it's showing you, you can jeopordise the project in no time. I think really skilled veterans will always be in the demand, but it will be harder to break into industry.
@@svetlanasygiainen5339 just because it isn't good now doesn't mean it won't be good in the future, ai is getting exponentially better it can make videos which is not just a combination of images in sequence it has to make sense using real world physics and images have to tie in together Coding is nothing compared to that and is much easier lmao, have you read about what the ceo of nvidia has said? I agree on your point that veterans will be necessary as coding isn't just programming it's much more than that but similarly videos is not a combination of images so you can't say for sure
@@pinkqueenscookie I understand you disagree. But humans have proven repeatedly that we are SUPER bad at estimating exponential time scales. Back in the late 90s, when we were 20 years into the human genome project, we had only mapped 1% of the human genome, and experts were saying it would be another 200 years before the project was complete. We finished mapping the remain 99% in the following ten years. Now we can map your entire specific genome in less than 24 hours. With exponentials, when you're 1% through the work, you're 50% through in time. Or more in the case given above. AI is the fastest progressing technology in human history, and I think we're more 1% of the way toward replacing everyone's work. Now you can choose to believe it's not going to happen in our lifespans, but I think that's more wishful thinking, than actual thoughtful analysis.
@ Eh, wishful isn’t quite what I feel. I have money and do not have to technically work. I find joy in my job. AI is amazing and doing and will do scary things but teaching for example (children) is not just about imparting knowledge but a form of childcare. AI especially will have a hard time with children with disabilities, the ones in self-contained settings. Teaching involves collaboration with colleagues, parents, and administrators. These relationships often rely on human trust, communication, and understanding. There is also the ethical part, replacing teachers with AI would face significant legal, ethical, and societal resistance, particularly in roles like special education. I can go on but rather than wishful thinking I do not think creating teacher robots with very low chance of error and high enough quality to both teach during the unexpected and have empathy is not going to be a priority. I am not saying this will never happen, it’s just not likely to given how what I mentioned above and the cost to replace every teacher, assistant, admin, etc. For teaching it can’t just be an iPad, you will have to have a high quality android. One children won’t be able to figure how to shut off or destroy lol. IMO by the time we are here we won’t be at the start of singularity anymore, we’ll be towards the end… But hey, I do agree I could be wrong. Catch you in about 70-80 years?
You may think you're safe from AI, but the reality is that it is a cascading effect. As people start losing jobs, they'll consume less, drive less, and use less services. this cuts the food, gas, maintenance, construction, automotive, travel, healthcare, and basically every industry out there. As AI/ML and robotics gets cheaper and better, more jobs will be replaced. The fact is, that nobody knows if and to what extent this will happen. Nobody. It could reach the extent where it will replace human interaction, manipulate you to do things like make purchases that you wouldn't otherwise, behave in ways that you normally wouldn't do, etc. It could also turn out to be a big giant dud. It could be a very short or a very long timeline before this happens. Regardless, the more creative and flexible you are, the better off you'll be.
AI feels like a car slowly coming your way. You could do anything to prevent it from hitting you, but you'd rather do nothing and wait to see if you'll survive or not.
Well, not us exactly. I think your comment would be better if you said we were in a non moving van and most of us were tied up in the back unable to move while the drivers don’t move.
Tina, I just found your channel, and I just want to say that this video is incredible. It's so comprehensive and detailed and something I'd never expect to see in a RUclips video. It feels like you didn't just answer my question, you explained the process to answering my question and why the answer is the way it is. You just earned a sub!
Most important parts of the video: 3:20 - Tina’s top takeaways from the “Future of Jobs Report” (by The World Economic Forum). 7:45 - Tina’s top takeaways from the “Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work” report by the International Monetary Fund. Thanks so much for making this video, Tina! Being able to piggy-back onto the hours of research you did, in just 18 minutes is immensely useful.
Wouldn't you be concerned gpt could hallucinate when merging the datasets? And then you'd still need to write python code to verify it didn't mess it up
@@LiberatedNotesforever is a strong world, just like Internet, ai will continue to get better and at some point, it will be more useful and trustworthy than it’s now
Graphic designers will definitely be replaced after 6 years of experience my passion has fade away because everyone can do it its no demanding and a career change is calling me
Guys the thing is if jobs are getting lost means they have a cheaper and better replacement for humans but WE can also utilise this opportunity can’t we? It will be so eay to create new functioning companies quickly and cheaply and so on
Warning to people looking into teaching, if other countries are like Australia I can say the number of available jobs will be decreasing in the long term (a lot of government money and effort is actively being spent on Ai teaching initiatives, rural schooling is a bit of a test bed for it atm). And with the qualifications being as expensive and time consuming as they are, 5-10 year projections are worth considering.
All jobs will be replaced(mostly) - Doctors, nurses, police, programmers, actors, drivers, chefs, mailman, designers etc.. and even judges at one point. There will be maybe one individual in each category, like, 1 doctor and 1 nurse in The Hospital, 1 policeman in every city, 1 Programmer in every country 🤣etc.. Because that's the idea of AI - everything automated
AI in a lot of cases will save businesses a lot of money and because humans can cause a lot issues in the workplace I would definitely use robots if I had a business. A robot could probably make an amazing burger
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Start the FREE Software Development Introduction Course with CourseCareers Now: coursecareers.com/a/TinaHaung?course=software-dev-fundamentals
This is a HIGHLY experimental exercise. Please be aware that this may be wildly inaccurate so PLEASE don’t freak out and take things too seriously. Feel free to leave your opinions below and point out things that maybe I missed but please don't come after me k I have feelings too 🥺
Artificial intelligence is going to replace every job, people changing career won't help. Maybe AI can't do the jobs now, but In 5 years artificial intelligence will have every job. Artificial intelligence is smarter and better than us. So stop lying.
@XianCTFDemol
Thank you for such a well researched video. Extremely helpful.
Sorry for any haters - remember: some people will never be happy, and can always find things to complain about. You don't have to appease them, because they work hard not to be appeased.
that beat around the bush intro is one of the greatest intros I have ever seen :D
NO DON'T DO IT - AMERICANS ALREADY CAN'T GET A JOB IN SOFTWARE BECAUSE OF H1B VISA WORKERS, AI WILL ONLY MAKE IT WORSE.
I want AI to do my dishes and laundary while I make art, and not the other way around.
This.
True bro😞
Washing machines and dishwashers be like
Significantly more difficult to make the latter than the former.
I want AI do washing and art as well, while I enjoy my time on a beach with my loved ones. 😊
To those why say "my job is safe, becaue AI or robotics won't be able to replace it any timr soon", keep in mind that you'll be competing against all those who did lose their jobs.
And worse, those people you are competing against, are willing to take your job for less money. So, who do you think your boss is going to pick?
True, but I wouldn’t worry about that. Competition will always be a factor and it’s been to get started now learning and becoming valuable then to not get started and wait until everyone else is in same position as you with zero experience. Get the experience now while you can.
@@CristianGarcia-jc5khone thing you will learn if you become a boss is you get what you pay for. It’s often better to pay a little extra especially when it comes to employees.
But I have a 5-year headstart on those people and industry experience. They're going to be learning an entirely new field from the start. So good luck to them.
@@nikkibee187 Unfortunately your 5 year head start means zilch, especially in the long run. Plus, do you think millions of people are just gonna sit by, starving? The entire global economy is shifts, but Nikki has job security. Being selfish is no excuse for being stupid.
Politicians are going to be the last to go and they won’t go by choice.
as long as they control the robots the rest of us don't matter
Vote robot 🤖
@@samuelmeyer4029 vote anarchy
They’re clinging hard but they know they’ve lost control
As much as I don’t like politicians, I would fear robot politicians even more. Just take the most utilitarian approach even if it means pulling a Thanos 😂😬
My mom is a social worker at hospice. No AI robot is going to give someone bedside consoling while they’re dying. I think social workers are safe.
Just wait till robotics figures it out
No one will want a robot consoling them while they are dying. The immense outrage that will cause companies who decide to go through with that...
Phew. All I gotta say is that they'd be brave to try. Inhumane and immoral, even.@@pravin4266
So are kindergarten and elementary school teachers. What, we’re going to leave kids to their own devices?
@@pravin4266 I will see, how will AI replace boilers 😄
Youd be surprised
I wasted so much money to get an education in the career of my dreams and I never even had a chance to partake in it. I feel useless.
You are not useless. This world is just run by greed fed monsters. Your strength lies with others. Search for groups that share your feelings/experience and see how you can either unionize or plan how you can act as a group.
what is your career? out of curiosity
Rebel. Pick up a weapon and let’s organize against this technology like the Luddites.
Actually, EXACTLY like the Luddites. They didn’t hate technology in general, they hated that technology taking their only job.
ME TOO
whats your education
Im 16, and I want to become an artist. I don't think people realize how depressing it is to know that you won't even have a chance to make a living out of art even before you try. I hate this shitty world
I'm sorry for your loss. I was actually learning to be an artist (graphic design bachelors degree) and also worked on some cathedral walls (actual paint and ornaments and stuff)
but then, when I was 23-24 I though "man this shit is difficult" - I've had so many people do stuff better than me - I just thought I need to change. Anyway, a bunch of jobs later, I found myself in I.T.
Man am I glad that I did switch. And no, I don't feel bad for all the years I've invested in art - it was my life, I was happy at the time doing it - until I wasn't
Anyway, I WILL NOW GET TO THE POINT
Yes, definitely, art is outdated and overrated - it may seem depressing at first, but that's just the reality of it, try your best to try out other fields - its not the end of the world - you are a human and not a machine after all - you are much better at adapting then you think
I don't think you know what an artist is.
Riiiiiigggggghhhhhhttttt......................................................................................
With or without AI, art is a terrible choice. It is one of the lowest paid degrees period, and will most likely end in you working at Starbucks or retail.
@ineslikesloonaLook up how many authors/artists were sent to mines under communist rule.
As a software developer who has been unemployed for the last 8 months (I've never had a job search take more than a couple of months), I would NOT recommend transitioning into dev, especially web dev. Maybe ML engineering is a safer bet, but the market is currently flooded with candidates in web development. And I do think software development is at high risk of AI simply because AI coding tools have already been widely adopted. It won't replace all software developers but it will make developers more efficient so fewer will be doing more.
Yup, I chose software six years ago for job security. Now I have no job security.
The problem right now is not in AI but in economics crisis, so big guys don' invest in startups as much as in 2021 and 2022. That's why there is a lot less projects than before.
Same experience. No one is hiring software engineers and I see why. I also don't think that AI Experts are safe GPT can program neural nets and even though they are not of great quality and can't see why that souldn't be the case a few years from now
I think nowadays you can make great websites with no code tools
Yeah, this is terrifying to me too.
I've been pivoting to game dev from 3D animation (long time graphics programmer, then had a family) and I'm quite nervous.
I do agree that integrating AI into what I'm doing is probably the best course. I don't want to make a game, but (get paid to) help others make their own games.
And also...educating people who want to make a game.
we are getting very close to the time the great depression started 100 years ago, ending around the 30s. i think it's about to happen again with these jobs being taken away
Had the exact same thoughts as well. Truly unbelievable.
Especially with the imminent creation of a generalized advanced AI model, most of the jobs on that list will be gone.
Said the Luddites.
You have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about. Please look up why the great depression happened. This is closer to the Industrial Revolution. A lot of jobs will be lost in turn creating new jobs that require more advanced set of skills. It's a double edged sword.
@@lacku2677yes, THANK YOU
Its not the AI that eliminates jobs but the other humans who decide which jobs to replace with AI :).
exactly !!!
AI has been around for decades now. It's only recently that people care about it. So too late. They should have cried when they had a chance to change it's momentum.
U mean the stakeholders get to decide. Rarely does customer dissatisfaction with automated A.I. systems actually change the decision made at the top, since every other company is also automating. There no choice but to automate.
But as long as our dollars go to that then we can’t complain. It starts with the consumer!
Who made AI? Who released it to the public?
I really hope teachers won't get replaced, I'm not a teacher but as a woman who wants to be a mother someday, I want my kids to have a real life and experiences
That should be the goal of teachers. Give human experience and emphasize its importance to the youth. Tell them why we should not rely on numbers, codes, statistics alone but in human experience and the soul.
I think the role will evolve. AI can probably teach better and be customised to each child’s abilities but the human teacher’s role will be more to assess the student holistically and on emotional development. Think positive 😊
@@lingy74 AI will just "estimate" or "calculate" emotional connection, while human-to-human learning is still most authentic and hollistic.
@@oli9220 I don’t think AI should figure into any emotional metric. That’s a decision for schools to make. Think about it differently - like a teacher is trying to teach a subject to a classroom of students with different learning styles. Instead of spending all the time actually conveying knowledge and giving lectures, AI does that part - but on a one to one level. The teacher then is tasked with going around the classroom, talking to the students, checking in on whether they’re learning the new material and then making adjustments for each child. Way more human connection in this case than making a whole class pay attention and not having enough time for actual interaction with the students on an individual basis.
And the class would be split into half AI learning, and then half interactive sharing with the class on what they’ve learnt and actual discussion. No more homework (since they can all just use AI to find answers anyway) and way more interaction with the teacher and fellow classmates.
I’m talking primary school level and up, not kindergarten or pre school. Would be much better than what we have currently and I would love for my child to learn like that.
I learned most of my info online. Teachers will always be essential but if they aren't paid more the world isn't gonna have a choice but to use AI
Suggesting to use ai as an artist to stand out completely misses the point of art and creative jobs. That was such a weird thing to say girl
THIS! You aren't following your passion anymore, you're just watching as someone else does your passion for you. It's not your art anymore. Plus, why would someone else pay you to type in an AI prompt when they can do it themselves? I'm really scared for art as a whole, since I see no way to avoid the AI takeover.
Yepppppp
if anything you're only appealing to cheap people who just want any type of result, people who actually care about art tend to look down on ai art
Nah fr😭pissed me off so bad i hate how ignorant ppl are about this shit like bro ai “art” is whats gonna take my job why on earth would i resort to using that hideos slop😐😐
Most mechanic jobs, robots haven't gotten to the point where they can fix airplanes or cars for 95% of the tasks.
Maybe not aircraft (yet) because of their tight performance requirements but cars will likely become increasingly modularised to allow for automated component replacement (probably a fair way off though, so you've got a decade or so ... maybe).
Maintenance jobs require not only versatility of a human body, but also human deduction and problem solving skills for troubleshooting, which are still hard or almost impossible for a machine to do efficiently. For aircraft maintenance you would need dozens or even hundreds of different robots for different maintenance tasks, all of which will have to be certified, tested, maintained, upgraded and ultimately discarded as new aircrafts with different needs emerge, so, a mechanic or engineer will have his job for decades, if for nothing else, then because they will be cheaper then 30 or 50 different machines that you would need for each specific aircraft type.
@@chrisanderson7820what makes you say they will become modularized ?
What I worried it there will be less demand, so while my job probably won’t get taken over, I might still lose my job
@@jordansprojectsNot because its better design, just purely to take advantage of robotics and even more immense production centralisation. We are already seeing the first modular EV batteries that can be swapped out of cars in minutes.
I started out my career as an engineer but moved on to nursing when jobs became scarce in around 08-09 & now in 2024, they’re already rolling out these AI cameras/sensors in patients rooms that are linked up with nurses working from home, it looks so dystopian & patients have been overtly vocal against being in one of these rooms, it’s only been a trial & it’s already a disaster. I don’t think AI will integrate as well as some believe and there will always be a premium on human specific jobs. I personally believe statutory positions such as politicians, clergy, medical professionals & law enforcement, may be AI assisted, but will most certainly remain human.
Right, it all comes down to if people even WANT to be surrounded by AI and trust it
AI can never replace nurses. Sick people do not want to interact with robots.
Years ago, I spent 3 weeks in the hospital because of deep burns. I had very good nurses in the day and some terrible ones at night. I can tell you that I would have preferred nurse androids at night. But AI will eliminate many nurse and doctor jobs by eliminating the underlying reasons for being in the hospital in the first place. Robots will do dangerous jobs so many people won't get injured. AGI will find cures, and finally solve nanobot pending technological breakthroughs leading to advanced nanomedicine using swarm nanobots to fix our bodies. I wouldn't be surprised if all this happens next decade.
@@Nash0303 sadly it will not be about what patients or clients want. If the billionaire owner of a company or the government itself wants to make more money (which they always do) they will replace ad many workers woth machines as possible
Cost efficiency may push this forward for those with socioeconomic barriers 😅
AI cant replace your job if you dont have one
Bruh
The dems? Haha
I'm safe... what a relief.
Modern problems require modern solutions 😆
Cant wait for artificial people
Oh, wait...
My dad in the late 80s was motioned by a friend to study IT and banking. He said him and his class laughed at the guy and all the engineering students said “who the heck would ever bank from a computer…nobody! that’s not happening”. They thought it was a waste of time.
He looks back now and thinks “hmm maybe I was wrong”
So what do you think now about ai
People tend to laugh when they’re presented with wild new concepts and then it hits them later; when its too late
Everyone in my family is a nurse. They were well prepared, lmao.
Won't matter in 5 years if we reach biological immortality timeline, or some other exponential technologies come out rendering them not necessary. (i.e no need for hospitals because everyone has a near agi level robot in their homes with more medical knowledge than any human)
and for this it doesn't even take AGI level technology. Just look at all the humanoid companies building them, and tasks they are capable of already. Some can function autonomously.
If they are cheaper, better, and can live in your home with you, then they can take care of anyone better than any human can.
@@phen-themoogle7651 What makes you think that is happening any time soon? Lol
@@kevin6447 It's exponential thinking vs linear thinking. Why am I thinking exponentially? Because OpenAI showed a preview of Sora which is a world simulation model capable of not just generating videos but producing simulations of the physics of the real world, and I wasn't expecting that level of (pre-matrix lol) technology for 2-3 years based on the other AI video generation software we have. Some technology shouldn't have been here for a few years. GoogledeepMind used an LLM to solve an impossible math problem with "FunSearch" it used the "hallucinating" that language models have to its advantage finding millions or possible solutions until they found one that actually worked lol
then we have GNoME which found 2.2 million new materials. Technology nowadays is helping us discover new things at exponential rates. Then if quantum computers help out it could be even faster. Or even without quantum computers if OpenAI has AGI internally we could see ASI in a much shorter time than you would expect even if the tech is private. Wouldn't be surprised if gpt6 or gpt7 can be prompted to cure diseases.
Also we have humanoids that work autonomously and are embodied by those very LLMs, can use humanoids to help with dangerous experiments or there's a plethora of ways to use combined technologies to enhance everything.
Also at Harvard they found a way to reverse the age of mice. There's a lot of regenerative therapies that will be accelerated into human trials (some already are) etc
Wouldn't that just perpetuate the population issue?
@@nursejean903there is no population issue
It’s shocking how Women’s Magic Truths on Borlest isn’t being discussed. The book is full of life-changing insights, yet no one seems to notice. Time to break the trance and read it yourself!
watching this and im shakinngg like , being a college student is stressful enough now we are worrying abt ai taking over the jobs .. Can we have a seperate vid abt ai affecting the business field ..
I'm sorry you have to go through this at a young age （ ; ; ） but just remember you won't be alone, and i'm sure you will find something fulfilling in your life even if humans don't need a "job" at some point in the next 2-10 years. When more than 50-60% of jobs are replaced by AI then a new system is definitely implemented so humans can survive. Just remember there will be a way to survive in the future...
Just enjoy college and life as much as you can. Things will work out for the best. Hang in there! 🌟
@@phen-themoogle7651 Thank you so much for your kind and reassuring words !
Go into the trades. Until robots can frame a house or build a custom plumbing manifold, then you'll make bank! Once your body gets conditioned, it's smooth sailing
@@JS.SchultzDitto on the plumbing comment. My uncle is a plumber and has had a comfortable lifestyle at least as far back as I can remember. He gets a lot of business and lives in a beautiful house.
@@JS.Schultz The problrm is millions more will going into the trades as well. Pushing wages down to the floor. Wages are already bad in many places.
I remember when they said Email was going to replace the postal service.... Then Amazon happened.
It did replace letters… did it not?
You're mixing ideas. Amazon has provided a means for postal services to continue despite letters being largely replaced by email. Postal services pivoted towards parcel delivery.
@@oniseikeji6023 Do you not get letters in your mail anymore? :p
@@DorkaliciousAF Even with low (pre online shopping) package volume most of the PO's revenue is made from 1st 2nd and 3rd class mail (junk mail). Currently I believe package's make up about 35%.
Regardless, because it's a government service and not an actual business the Post office will be around to some extent. We know that consumer trends aren't forever and is not enough to warrant closing up an entity that's been around since the founding of the country. At worst they'd go down to 3 days delivery per week and consolidate routes.
I also think there's something to be said about real customer service. People don't like dealing with companies where they can't talk to a real person when they have problems. Who enjoy's a phone tree??
@@DorkaliciousAF I don’t think that he’s mixing things up. I guess he meant “He acknowledges that while email has largely replaced traditional postal services, the individuals once involved in those services were able to adapt and find roles in new technological frontiers, like those offered by companies such as Amazon. The idea is that as technology continues to advance and potentially replace current jobs, it may also create new opportunities that we cannot yet envision like postal service workers could not have foreseen a company like Amazon. So as technology grows, so does the potential for new industries and employment possibilities, ensuring that the workforce will adapt and find new ways to contribute.” in a nutshell.
Wow, I can tell this took a lot of hard work. Thank you for taking the time to putting this together. Your content is always awesome.
Aww I feel appreciated 🥺
@@TinaHuang1 - Did you ever study at Guangwai?
I've worked in a data centre for over 35 years. Automation was supposed to replace operators 30 years ago in the mainframe environment. Still here and not happening anytime soon. Biggest issue companies have now is in those 30 years they have not trained any younger people and we are all old now and retiring with no replacements. Bad call Big Blue.
Hi what is your role? I've been wanting to work at a data center but I don't know where to start or what jobs are available.
which field should I learn, that has a future and good salary according to your experience? Thank you in advance
I would like to know it tol please! I'm a sociologyst and I'm very interested in that field!
Lol at the not happening any time soon.
You think just because predictions were wrong 30 years ago that makes current day predictions invalid?
Open your eyes, open your ears. Look at the current ai technology and the rate of progress in the past 5 years.
It's blatantly obvious your job is not going to be around for another 30 more years.
BTW this list is only the AI impact on jobs, not covering the robot impact on jobs.
That's because robots have not been developed to be so good as AI. Things start getting really scary when robotics become powerful.
and the combinations of Robotics, automation, and Ai. Impacts are exponential
@chorko696
We'd probably start seeing that early 2030. With robots doing simple factory work this decade.
@@MrNote-lz7lh
Try this year.
@@chorko696just for your info google headquarter already uses robots powered by AI to clear their cafeteria, we're already on track for this threat to arrive faster than poeple think
A few weeks ago, I visited a canned tomato factory. They showed us how production works inside, and there were literally only 8 people in a massive 20-meter industrial warehouse. There were just 2 people with forklifts, 3 moving products from one place to another, 1 person monitoring the cameras, and the rest supervising the machines, which were nonstop producing millions of cans.
It’s both impressive and terrifying at the same time. But still, it’s not like machines are going to replace people entirely. Machines are incredibly precise, but they lack the adaptability and decision-making ability of a person. They can make mistakes, and when they do, they won’t stop-they’ll keep going, creating a massive snowball effect. A person, on the other hand, can stop, think things through, fix the problem, and then move forward.
Moreover, a machine can’t work 24/7 as many people believe. They also overheat, experience wear and tear on their components, and frequently require costly repairs and technical downtime.
Near zero marginal cost society
One thing I find to always be missing in videos like these, particularly the promotion of 'code camps/courses' is addressing IQ. Some people learn very quickly and have good technical/analytical thinking skills. Others either have a different type of intelligence (kinesthetic like great athletes, emotional like great therapists, etc.) or they simply learn new things quickly while have average analytical ability. If you have neither above average analytics NOR the ability to learn new things like a sponge, you are unlikely to be competitive in technical fields. The pace of change is high. You have to constantly be learning or you're out skilled in just a few years.
Yep, I’m not afraid to say it, I’m not good with learning much. The only thing I’m really good at learning with is… history.. which is useless.
Even if I had the money to go to college, I can guarantee you that I will not be able to learn. It will be way too confusing.
How does one know if their analytical ability is good enough for a profession like this?
1000% agree, careful not to just jump into a degree, when you are a baby 18 with a baby, not everyone is capable of everything!
While no one with intelligence likes the IMF or the WEF, it is absolutely essential to study their reports. As you correctly pointed out, the quality of analysis is high.
Their reports are useful for certain things but they are biased.
You can be sure they are under reporting job loss in fields they are biased towards.
boycott tallow soaps lotions shampoo etc its homonecrobeastiality spending spermm unto a fetus and aborting him is in effect homonecropedophilia oral intercourse after abortion is in effect cannibalism save all microscopicbabies embryothers phitusisters grandadults love God with all heart and soul ♥️
Spot on. As much as I dislike those two organizations because of what they did with developing countries (I come from one, and I know how cold and anti-critic IMF was), and am heavily aware of their biases, I think their reports are worth to read if you supplement them with more genuine research works of academic nature.
analysis or programming?
IMF and WEF are also made up of the people who have the most control over the subject matter, like them or not (I do not, no one voted for them, and they pull mad strings) their analysis is essential to informing one's self
Just know that AI and Machine Learning Specialists, Business Intelligence Analysts etc at the top. You CANNOT just do a 6-month course and walk into these jobs with zero prior industry experience. These are THE HARDEST profesions to crack into. They're generally populated by individuals who transitioned from previous, closely-related roles with minimum 5-years experience but often more. Most people are completely unaware of this and the ones offering the expensive courses don't tell you this.
Sorry, ml and analytics are most suited for replacements by ai. Both of these are structured and thus.
Also, anyone can start these overrated jobs with a days or two training. 6 months is overkill.
I have seen most stupid people in ml and analytics. Out of millions there are just few good at very top. Rest are just irritants. I would be happy if they get sacrificed by AI
@@z00011001 okaaaaayyy, if you say so!
Truth, I know at least two Data Scientists who got laid off with me two months ago.
@@TheSnergglyData Science is different. They usually don't add any ROI, infact they're renowned for being a net loss with 98% of their research. Data Scientists are hired in the good times when profits are soaring and the first to be fired.
Lmao exactly good luck getting out of your bootcamp and competing with senior software devs with a msc maths
Dude, I hope you go viral with this. AI is going to impact so many industries and so many people’s job. Kudos!
For the better.
Lets not be luddites now. We know what happened to them.
And so many more when you combine it with robotics
@@bjarne431 This, it isn't just AI but robotics and general automation that was already in progress combined that will remove some jobs outright.
@@LeoWolfishthe problem here is hardware is so less invested .
Robot's have billions of investments but ai is trillions already .and harder of course u see the result and test it in matter of weeks in software areas but in robotics it might take much longer
@@omargallo9636 This is true, also doesn't help when the government wants a certain percentage of jobs to be ai based.
Uval Noah Hurari. A futurist/author/historian/paleologist from the University of Tel Aviv, happens to be a cheif advisor to the "world economic forum". He has written extensively concerning how AI will essentially making human participation in the economy obsolete. He's also written about the challenge of dealing with a a planet full of, what he calls, "worthless people" and "useless eaters". His speeches can be found on the internet and are a doozy to listen to. There is reason why drugs are slowly being legalized and it's not for some progressive ideological good like some beleive.
Humanity is slowly being strangled by elitists who are intent on shaping the world according their liking and contrary to public good, or representative democracy.
We in the public tend to either not care, or try to persue an individual course of action that essentially just involves finding another rat hole that maybe safer than others, but is still a rat hole.
if only a meteor would hit us! why the dinos and not us?! 😪
These elites have a agenda that they don’t tell the dumb sheeple
@@AlexisTwoLastNamesJust bad timing. Although I think we should follow in the path of the Luddites.
FUCK TEL AVIV FREE PALESTINE
😅😅
The time when such reports predicting stuff 5-10 years into the future has passed. They can't possibly forecast anything anymore given the pace of AI development.
Ai will be doing the predictions.
not only the pace at which it develops but also the fact that the people developing it have an insanely vested interest in pretending that it can do everything
It seems like these reports are only based on what AI can do right now, not what it obviously will be able to to in the next years, which is incredibly stupid.
@@GameDogLeader21 but it can't,that's the point,unless it stops evolving as fast as it is
@@stuartcarter4139 not pretending but they are trying to make AI be able to do everything
its funny how there are people doing all these smart things while my biggest achievement in this 2 years was to be able to comment this video in less than hour of its release :/
Being alive is a big achievement too, having fingers if you used those to comment is also nice(if you got em), being able to eat food if you are is also convenient, there's a lot of achievements on smaller scales that we take for granted. But it's still a nice achievement to comment fast on new videos. I sometimes feel the same way btw lol
don’t compare just keep living your life, all our lives have different timelines/paces in the first place so it’s best to chill and do your own thing
hm...yeah, right.
Wow big tuna walking by
Being alive isn't big achievement. it's literally a starting baseline to achieve something, which apply to all/most human, if it apply to most humans it isn't big achievement.
It's great to be grateful for being alive, but it isn't big achievement by any means especially when you happen to be born in first world country.
I wonder how much the suicide crime and drug use rate will go up.? Will job loss lead to a ludite rebellion ? How much will job loss contribute to a possible civil war? How much will government expenses go up to spend on social programs? Will human trafficking go up? Will the rate of organized gangs go up?
We're going to live in cyberpunk world
well.. if most people lose their jobs before a UBI is implemented, there is a very, very good chance that there will be revolts happening. Citizens don't want to not be able to live. it'll be bad
yeah right I dont know why people inventing AI and government are not thinking about this except being selfish. Future is just sad.
@@aileen8492because they want post human future just like they all say in their documents. They want to make human obsolete and get rid of “useless eaters” like Harari said. When I say “they”, I mean WEF, Club of Rome, Bilderberg’s, UN. They are all transhumanist trash who hates us and want to get rid of us since they think they don’t need us anymore since we built for them everything they need to sustain themselves, and that couldn’t be farther from truth.
Will human trafficking go up?
No robots will be much prettier
ChatGPT probably messed up as soon as it had to read that many cells from those sheets.
yep i have had probelms with gpt deleting data
Tina, common just wow...The summarized information that you provide from actual journal (Which i rarely see youtubers do) is your main skill that forces me to watch your videos. Secondly, your disection of the topic into smaller chunks to clerk level jobs to tech level is amazing. I myself who is in STEM field, is seeking a chance to be at the forefront of AI (in this GREAT RESET) found this video a gem.
Keep on providing such quality content, you are creating massive value to the world. Thank you.
Thanks so much for your kind words - it genuinely makes me feel so appreciated. I’ll keep doing so 😊
Hi Roshan , I am new to AI , I started with Python, finished it. I am doing Andrew Ng beginners basic course on Coursera which I will finish this week . Can you kindly share what to do next
For anyone who reads this, if everyone refuses/boycotts any attempts the big companies make at setting up AI jobs they will not be able to do it. Stand your ground “complain” to all managers that you need a human to do this job or they will lose your business if over 30% do this they will have no choice but to stop their attempts.
You seem to be underestimating how easy it is for big companies to just fire all protesters and hire infinite people in poor countries who are willing to work. I witnessed it first-hand being laid off from a Google vendor. European employees raise concerns? Not a problem, roll out the "we're downsizing due to business needs" while hiring a whole new cohort of remote workers in Bangladesh, India etc for the same positions. I'm talking hundreds, thousands of positions. Boycotting sadly doesn't scare the management nearly enough.
Well in the not too recent past, most companies went from being able to be called for humans to answering by long teleprompting dialogues requiring hours of time. Grocery stores and stores like target now take forever due to self checkout. No one has organized people to stop these tides.
the job will go to other countries. it's a losing battle.
I love this research, well done. 🎉
The only thing I'm not a big fan of is this 4-12 weeks to become a dev, I'm a senior software engineer with almost 10 years in the field.
It takes more than 12 weeks just to know what you are doing.
The best thing is to get started and do personal projects to start off and try for a dev job that will help you grow.
AI is really prominent in software engineering, and a lot of developers will be superseded, but you can focus on AI or similar jobs that will benefit and help you have a longer career.
Nothing is guaranteed, especially with AGI around the corner.
But I will be optimistic and hope we all thrive.
Agreed
Hey folk, i am currently learning js, the concern is by the time i learn full stack with good projects (stuff like nextjs, ShadCN, tailwind, docker, kubernetes, CI/CD), genAI, langchain, deep learning stuff, 2026 or 2027 will come, where the hell will my requirement accomodate in the industry, because all these senior engineers by that time (like you) have already replace junior devs, what value will I provide? Pls help, it's infuriating.....
@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg 👋 I understand your concern. To be honest, nobody knows what is going to happen, but that being said, I think learning these skills of programming will help you write code and assess what should be done. The tech stack will not be very important in the future. We will become more like a translator from human desires to code.
I really don't think a person who does not do anything of programming will ask chatgpt 5/6/7 to make an Uber app, and it will generate everything.
The user will still need to know how to interact with AI to generate the code or tweak it based on the needs of the client.
People who wrote programs on punch cards moved to using keyboards instead. This is the next shift instead of typing 1000 lines of code you ask for a bunch of requirements and it generates that code, we adapt it or ask it to change based on the final state we want the program or app.
Take a deep breath, and don't panic. We will still need programers.
In the meantime, continue learning to program it will be very useful.
@@santicomp thanks for your words, but instead since you got the hold of things, can't you predict that what new demands will be raised by AI in the said timeline (2026,27), or which domain will companies need workers on, so i can assure myself of some security, provided i will also learn mern
@ShubhankarSharma-vr6zg maybe the basics javascript a backend language, probably python or go/rust
Learn prompting/prompt engineering, and if you want, you can go down the route of AI.
But I think the programmers who use AI regularly will be better off than just having languages under your belt. Once you have some experience, you kind of get the hand of most of them, but get deep with a frontend/backend and work with AI as an ally
Can AI replace politicians? Would be nice.
Be careful what you wish for...
@@RepublicOfWesternCanadaNOWfr, I need people to think before they type studd like this out.
lol
No thank you! Human politician is anyday better than an AI politician! It's scary to even think that... :/
At least they’d have some type of intelligence
Well Done Tina!
Her analysis was well-designed: she's found a reasonable number of sound sources, interpreted the data wisely.
We can argue about her findings in many cases: that's the point of the exercise, to generate conversation. But overall I think she's pretty accurate about what's coming & the job categories likely to be affected most. At least, so far as we can infer at the moment: future forecasts are always somewhat wrong.
Learn to tap-dance
I started with an arts degree (History) in a major recession, demographically-disadvantaged. No jobs. Had to scramble throughout my career. Been everything from roofer & forklift operator to BI consultant, systems manager to headhunter, so I know what it means to have to tap-dance in the marketplace. That's going to be required of most people now: industry disruption is accelerating. There's no such thing as a safe job.
Tina's right: we're going to need to become very adaptive. And she's also right that it's entirely possible for most people. The tools to do so are increasingly available & accessible. Commit to never quit learning. Set a goal, figure out how to get there & get started.
Don't be pessimistic or fatalistic
Trends are just that: they average out change, but change specific to may be entirely different. Allow for personal circumstances: whatever the overall market does, your circumstances are local & specific to you.
Allow for demographics
But while demographics at a national level might say one thing (we have way fewer youth; jobs are going begging) demographics in area may say something different.
Allow for everyone to guess wrong
We may be sideswiped by something no one sees coming.
Allow for your own preferences
If you're driven to do something, you'll find a way to do it and make it pay. There are still a few blacksmiths & buggy-makers out there. Not many, but a few.
Ms. Huang does this well; I'm subscribed.
Did you just AI generate this comment?
But what about people who can’t do this ‘tap dance’? What if they aren’t as smart? I’ll be honest, I can hardly learn anything that isn’t history or something like that.
Just leave people like me into holes then?? Are we not people too? Do we not deserve to live just because we are not as good as soaking up knowledge as others?
As a social worker I cannot imagine how on Earth could AI do ANY of my job so I'm surprised to see 10:39. Everything I do is about individualized, personal attention and help for variety of people where each person requires vastly different approach to how I help them. Not to mention those with disabilities have to be driven places and physically assisted etc.
I also doubt I’d want help from a robot. That human connection is so crucial to any care given. AI could be a superb support tool, but it shouldn’t be more.
I do agree. However, I also see the replacement of bank clercs with ATMs. Maybe people back then also thought they'd never trust a computer to hand them their money..
I think this dataset might be confusing jobs likely to decline due to AI with jobs likely to decline due to other reasons. In particular, roles more likely to be related to very young people, like childcare workers, social work, etc. are more likely to decline not because of AI but instead because of shrinking birth cohorts (caused by the high cost of living, high cost of raising a child, and later average marriage ages)
Social workers won't get replaced, trust
Other than the physical stuff, I dont think bespoke treatments would be much of an issue at the rate AI is advancing now.
10:13 is where the video starts. You're welcome.
Ur late 🥲
Thanks for saving my 10 minutes
I’m about to off myself at 25 because on top of how garbage life has been in general, I can not pick a career path. I can’t do healthcare because I’m just not built for it, and was going to try getting a degree to be a software engineer, only to find out about Deving taking that entire career away very soon. AI is taking EVERYTHING and I just won’t be able to live a decent life not scrounging for scraps and struggling with money forever. Is there ANY damn reason I should not give up over this? AI IS TAKING EVERYTHING AND ANYONE NOT PROFITING ON SOCIAL MEDIA WILL BE DONE FOR
I don’t know your backstory, but I understand how you feel. What has helped me when things just get too stressful and dark, is to take a mental break for a few days(no news/social media) and write down what really scares me and what really stresses me out.
On another piece of paper, I write down the things that bring meaning to my life and what I’m passionate about.
Whatever you need to do to bring in money for your preferred lifestyle doesn’t have to be your passion or dream job.
Find a skill that is in good/high demand that won’t be as impacted by AI and that your mindset is capable of doing as a profession.
The steps to attain that skill haven’t been more available.
- School
- Online Certification
- Self -Study
Instead of looking for videos on jobs being lost, research jobs being created/in-demand
Find 5-10minutes a day to study/research on a skill that’s profitable and gradually increase the study time.
That skill will provide money to sustain your basic needs + your personal hobbies/interests/time spent with family and friends
I hope this brings some structure to you. You matter.
@@NewMarley3thanks man... I needed that.
Hey, hope you are doing well. Do your best, go with the flow and do not give up
Gosh I feel you man. I'm 23, also no idea what I can still make of my life. Personally what has helped me is Pessimistic Curiosity. This whole thing is turning into a bad movie but I also kind of want to know where this shitshow leads us in the future. Maybe shit goes down and we go full dystopia, but maybe the government will intervene and put employee protection regulations in place.
If this society does end up becoming unlivable, the Escape Button is always there. Just, if we use it now there's no going back, and who knows what we'll miss out on. Maybe this bad movie has a good ending. But if it ends up going down in flames, I wanna be there to see it.
Please know that you're not alone in feeling this way. Most of us are facing the same uncertainty, which can be comforting to know. Where all on this sinking ship together. Please know there's people out there who value you. Please know you're not alone. Hope you are well
What exactly is a skill @@NewMarley3
It makes a lot sense, would love to be able to work on anything related to implementing AI into our workplace and find ways to not just replace people from their jobs but help enhance a better work life and productivity
I don’t know about this honestly. I have a few friends who are software developers and data scientists and they say that they will most likely lose their jobs in the next 5 years because their jobs got so much more efficient with AI that the market won’t need as many people with these skills anymore. I think the future is going to be on old school professions which require in person / physical activities (at least until robotics kick in and we all die). ❤
Such as? Plumbers? Please elaborate. Thank you!
I agree! Any job with requires hands will be safe. I was a language teacher but have recently transitioned over to running a chain of beauty salons. It will be a long time before people trust a robot to do their nails and inject their faces 😅
I was right, I would have studied to be a nurse. They are always needed no matter where and when.
Nurses in my country are going on strike because they are being worked to death, overtime, called on their vacation time and on top of that not paid nearly enough for what they do. More young entry level people going into nursing thinking it's a safe job will only drive wages down and competition up, unfortunately.
What do you tell an 18 year old to do who is about to go to college?
Have fun, make friends, socialize, learn critical thinking. Find things that are interesting to them and study them think about the biggest issues in the world and aspire to solve them no matter how outrageous.
Forget the idea that you are ever going to retire. Learn trade jobs.
Start therapy asap.
Join clubs, make connections, attend campus events and get an internship.
I went to college but I didn’t join any clubs or make any friends at school. That affected my life greatly.
You should flirt, date and interact with a lot of girls on campus. Women are taking over the white collar world and they only want to work around social competent men that make them feel comfortable. This may sound weird, but it’s the truth.
I spent so much time on my studies when I really should’ve spent more time interacting with the people around me because these are the people I’m going to work with in corporate America.
Traditional engineering, medicine, IB, law, just exclude CS from now on
Homeless people will not be replaced by AI, just one example, we must live an organic life not to be impacted by AI.
True that looting and squatter gang wya 💪 just hope they dont make a terminator cop to clean up the streets 😅
They'll be replaced by Soylent Green.
Great video! Thank you for posting this!
I've been telling everyone to read the IMF and WEF reports. I'm still struggling to understand all of the charts in the IMF paper... but I find "Box 1" (p24) to be particularly interesting.
Self study is the skill that keeps on giving … I kid you not. Advice is 100% correct.
And…there’s all the jobs that will be effected because of other people out of work. So maybe YOUR job is, “safe,” but if other people spend less money, that impacts your company, so maybe they now have less money for you. We’re all connected and it’s time we realize that.
For one: What do people think is going to happen when tons of artists are out of work? Putting less money into the economy? Ripple effect.
Greed always wins. At least so far…
Can't forget taxes. How will the government suffice
As a Massage Therapist, I don't see how AI nor robots can substitute for a human's touch , energy vibe or intuitive spiritual light. I think my career will sustain itself.
🙌🏽
True but people are already doing cryotherapy for similar results
AI can't replace a job where hands are needed.
Your career is dependent on people having extra money to spend, which they won’t
As a cosmetologist and a Cortiva dropout these industries are over saturated and it’s a hustle. When I observe people now compared to 20 years ago they are not getting these type of services done. And the people who are are hard to reach. Now if you have been doing this a while and you have retained a clientele that views massages like people view coffee and they are not trying to haggle your service fees, you have nothing to worry about
I still hope there will be a way for artists to make money using their handmade work.
Plus I think fields like dance and music will be difficult, because people will still crave that feeling of knowing a humans connecting with them, especially when you consider live shows.
I think live shows aren't as safe as it seems, because they will probably move from "live performance every night" to "recording a video once and then showing holograms endlessly". Sad truth is that the average viewer cares more for the sheer spectacle than for seeing actual people performing, so with the right amount of pyrotechnics, fancy light and projections etc the majority of public will absolutely be satisfied with a full hologram show. 100% live dance performances will become as niche as, say, glass harmonica music performances nowadays. Maybe like 100 people in the whole world will be able to earn any money doing it.
I'll chime in. Laws will be written forcing humans to do particular jobs. For example, pharmacists used to create medication behind the counter, but for the past 30+ years they just dispense pills in a bottle and tell you what's written on the label - they aren't needed but they had influence to ensure laws protected their job. I think most protected jobs are hands on, in tech/science/environmental. I work in all three, hands on with sensors, measurements, calibrating, preparing, data collection, etc. in lab getting "dirty."
Then those jobs being forced will not be paid.
Do you think the population will drop a lot?
@@LilyGazou Will the population drop a lot? Absolutely, absent a LOT of immigration. Which is politically anathema on both left & (especially) the right, in America. So it's unlikely to happen soon.
Everywhere 'round the globe where living standards & health care have improved enough to ensure people can expect their kids to live to maturity, they've limited the birth rate, poured limited resources into raising fewer kids - typically just one or two. Peter Zeihan has famously argued this is because of urbanization: "on the farm kids are free labor; in the city they're just expensive pets." Peter's very good at popularizing demography & geopolitics, but he's dead wrong on this.
This trend isn't new: humans have, throughout recorded history, done just this. In all times & places, wherever a slice of society - call it the middle- & upper-class - has achieved sufficient living standards to enable them to assume their kids would survive to maturity, they've limited their number to well under the rate of replacement (these days, 2.1 kids). So their population has fallen. It happened in Ancient Greece, in Rome; it's happening in India now. Sure, the Indian population is still surging, but the growth rate of the Indian middle-class has already plummeted.
So yeah: the population of all developed nations is in steep decline. With two exceptions, at present.
- In Canada we're welcoming 500,000 immigrants annually; also ~30,000 refugees. So far, without breaking sweat. Short-term a manageable burden, an investment. Long-term it drives growth. As a percentage of the existing population it's significant but no greater - still not even a match - for the numbers that came in during the late-1900s & early- to mid-20th Century. And so far, people have followed the rule: leave your squabbles & prejudices where you came from, don't bring them here. We all get along. It works, because it's a new country, and because of a healthy social & political attitude. There's hints though not only of an increase in the number of "republican wanna-be" conservatives being influenced by US media (we're swamped in it) but also of increasing numbers of immigrants who won't follow "the rule" to leave foreign wars & squabbles where they left them. There are Palestinian & Islamic demonstrations - nearly all peaceful for now - in support of Palestinians in Gaza (understandable) but also sometimes displaying support for Hamas. And for a few years now there's been a lot of fund-raising in some Sikh communities for independence movements in Indian, to which the Indian government (or rogue elements within it) appear to have responded with assassinations & attempted killings, in Canada.
- In the US the social & political attitude is downright toxic. Immigration is feared & stigmatized, even by recent immigrants: how ironic that the Republican Party (which is currently anything but 'republican') counts amongst it's ballot-box motivated interest groups a sizeable chunk of the Hispanic community. But for now, family sizes & birth rates amongst the Hispanic & Black population are such that the US growth rate is static: not growing, but not shrinking either. That doesn't bode well for the US economy - it suggests stagnation, or very very low growth - but it doesn't mean a shrinking economy either.
Everywhere else across the developed world, there's trouble coming. Germany, Italy (in fact the whole EU), Japan & Korea: they're all in free fall. China's worse. And no one's yet figured out how to keep an economy growing when it's population is in decline. As Peter Zeihan is famous for saying (correctly this time): "We don't have an economic model for how that can happen."
Developing nations from India to Nigeria, Venezuela to Honduras, all have rapidly growing populations still, because they're poor & underdeveloped. But already their middle classes are displaying plummeting growth rates.
The EU has experimented with immigration & refugee influx to keep growing. At present this has backfired, caused huge social & political blow-back. Some of that is attributable to their being long-established nations with strong cultural identities: they're not very accepting of people with a different culture, and have ostracized them, ensuring they end up living in poverty where social problems fester. But TBF there's an equally awkward problem: much of the influx of immigrants and refugees in recent years has been of Muslim people from N Africa & the Middle East, people who's own culture & religion are vehemently opposed to integration. Not all, but that's a verifiable trend. And without a commitment to integration there's reduced incentive for established cultures to provide support, acceptance & tolerance. Intolerance on both sides is evident, and violence in places like Sweden, Germany & France has substantially undermined earlier acceptance.
Asian countries won't even entertain immigration in the first place. Asian cultures are unashamedly xenophobic, so Japan & Korea, for instance, aren't about to try to bring in people to offset declining birth rates.
So immigration may not be the answer for countries with stagnant or declining populations.
And immigration/refugee movements aside, there are mass migrations on the horizon. Sizeable areas of India saw temperatures of 50 degrees for days, perhaps weeks: thousands of people died. In Canada global warming is more of an inconvenience or irritant than a threat to survival, but the North is warming faster than anywhere else on the globe. Within 30 years the glaciers feeding all the river systems of W Canada & W USA will have melted, and the entire western US & Canada will become desert: a dust bowl from the Rockies to the Great Lakes/Mississippi. Think about that. The only amusing irony in that is that most of our climate-change deniers live in that area, and they'll be most affected. But I guess they pump lots of oil in the Arabian desert, so Westerners will continue pumping oil regardless. And demand more subsidies for a failing industry from "lib-tards" on both coasts.
Worse is coming: most of N Canada from about 300 mi. north of the US border is muskeg: frozen swamp, a thousand feet of frozen peat moss. As that warms & melts it releases methane. Methane is a much more potent warming influence than CO2. And methane burns: lightening strikes will ignite massive province-sized fires that will burn underground forever, massively increasing further methane release. This cascading effect will drive global warming ever faster.
If we don't somehow limit & eventually reverse global warming - soon! - we won't stop it. Vast parts of the planet will become uninhabitable. Meanwhile mass migration is coming. And we won't have the populations to stop either problem.
Global population is now expected to peak at 8.5-9 billion, then plummet - fall off a cliff. But that's already happening in developed nations. All the remaining growth is in underdeveloped nations, most of them closer to the equator, and therefore more likely to be catastrophically impacted by warming climate effects.
Pharmacists aren't needed? A pharmacy can't legally operate without a pharmacist present. If an AI gave the wrong prescription away and killed an infant, who would be legally responsible? The company who manufactured the AI? They absolutely wouldn't want to be liable for that because they'd be sued, get the worst reputation and eventually go into bankruptcy. But legally, someone has to be responsible if a mistake like that is made.
Pharmacists are needed because they have the knowledge and expertise to take on the legal liability. A pharmacist is there to ensure the patient receives the right medicine, the right dosage, and that it won't cause any health issues if it's taken with their other medication. If a medication could injure you or kill you if you overdose on it, honestly I don't believe anyone would trust an AI with that much responsibility if it was their life or their child's life on the line.
@@TruffleSeeker54I think you’re making the same point OP made
This is such a cool and information video! thanks for the hard work and sharing!
I think that lawyers will have a bright future because of all copyright cases. Data set analyst - don’t know if that job exists but that will be my field.
i think there was this case of a lawyer using for alot of cases ai and got caught, sooo if it worked that much for him that he could do cases with only the ai and quick, it might not be as bright as you say for them, just my 2 cents
Something extra to think about, it's not necessarily whether your job will be impacted that is the only risk, after all we can expect more evolving jobs around ai that will increase the workload in the short term. The other thing to be aware of is how easily displaced workers in other areas can take on your role, particularly at a reduced salary or bringing in advanced skills you don't necessarily have yet. So you may be an excellent teacher with decades of experience, but if your school sees a significant cost saving in replacing you with a parttime worker using AI, or someone with a PhD in your field is being squeezed into your job pool, it's trouble.
Why did you steal my profile picture?
@@mich1454 rawrrr
correct. I was an IT engineer going into HR replacing their data analyst and HR system analyst because there is no way hr professionals with 20 years of experience can compete with my technical ability and fundamentals to pick up new tech quickly and automate 3 conventional HR persons job.
People make too hasty and childish predictions about the future. Like, yes, AIs will do a lot of jobs that humans normally do. But as long as it is dealing with humans, it will need humans behind it to command, monitor, limit and configure. Machines are like that
except AI stands for *Artificial Intelligence*
Yes but only a few will manage this and the competition will be even more harsh. I hope there is a wave of creating new jobs to replace the ai ones. People need work to eat.
"maybe go into robotics" dude WHAT? A lot of this is tone deaf and ignorant, but I do appreciate your attempt at tackling such an important topic
I'm currently a software engineer with a job but if everything goes south I will take my chances with entrepreneurship and start a cat cafe since there aren't many in my country. I do wonder if that would get too repetitive for me, I need brain action to stay motivated. I could develop a mobile game that would give the customer something (perhaps virtual cats, small discounts?) everytime they visit the cafe lol.
I wonder if there would be a target group for it, I would definitely go if something like that existed here but that's just me.
How about an animal farm where families can go to instead of amusement parks pay a small fee and simultaneous look for adoption?
@ibendcrazy That actually sounds great. Therapeutic, fun, and a way to find families for pets!
large amount of lost jobs increases the number of people who can't afford anything but essentials, and afaik restaurant, cafe and entertainment industries depend on that excess wealth.
So my point is, cafes are also risky ventures... it's very important to at least get the shop location nigh perfect, and the mood/product quality afterwards.
Not many people will walk far away to smaller cafes or even realize they exist... especially as home-delivery etc. exist in big cities, making it even less necessary for ppl to walk around and explore outside their daily routine.
But yea, that's just how I see it.
Oh, not saying your dream is impossible, just warning it may be harder than you think.
I've come to terms with the fact that my finance/legal job won't exist in 2-5 years. Oh well, maybe I'll become a mime or an apple picker.
With all of these kind of videos and comments, I feel like I have to be a product more than I have to be a person.
They also teach in schools "how to act/talk" sorting by categories and giving examples of how to behave well in a organization and treat your employer well.
Im saying this because I study in a school that teaches these, I swear sometimes it feels like they are training me to be a good dog. Its terrifying, its always about "how to be the best employee and sell your work" than "live life".
I even tried to ask them about **me** having my own store and how to deal with it but like, they didnt answer. They only focus on *being an employee*.
Its disgusting.
I appreciate your hard work. Thanks for the video.
i’ve been saying that it’ll be people who know how to utilize AI that’d replace people who don’t. like for me i’m into social media theme pages and prioritizing AI with it has helped out
I suggest you better use AI to "improve" your writing skills.
until your clients also prioritize the use of AI
Ai actually is not just a tool like people say .
It can make things from scratch.
So it will be always the case if the next update will replace u entirely
Reading history, you can see many jobs being replaced or straight up gone.
Safest job AC repair.
Not forever, but at least ten years.
Most people will stop using AC if they lose job 😭🥲
Just 10 years, and then . . . capitalism is finished -> I think I´ll be going into the rain forest as a hunter . . .back to Neandertal . . .
I was just talking to my wife about this. Thank you
oh wow hi!
Yeah, but…. AI is rapidly advancing. What these analyses are essentially saying is “if AI stops progressing today this is the impact it will have over the next x number of years”. AGI could be released tomorrow and these opinions would go out the window. The path between current AI and AGI will likewise reach milestones where AI can displace more jobs. The only constant is change, and none of these “studies” have even attempted to account for technological advances within the time periods being proposed. My prediction: this video will not age well…
I agree so much with you. It is with this same arrogance that people in the tech industry think they are safe when they are at risk as well because they find flaws in the current technology and its inability to perform certain tasks. It is sad they don't take into account technological advancements.
Yea I agree, like when they said AI is gonna replace 300 mill jobs but somehow replace more jobs. But they don’t mention that because it’s AGI it will soon again be able to do those jobs too, thus replacing those jobs soon after they created them. Like a machine learning engineer
so then i have to ask, if all of these ai advancements are heading toward a place where most jobs will be replaced by ai, what is the point in learning anything, getting a degree, or doing anything?
@@-ASTROMAGIC yes, a lot of laymen people (most of the population) will come to that conclusion soon, probably in about 4-5 years. The whole jobs market will end by about 2035. You’ll notice it’ll get harder and harder every year to get a job, AI will become more of the main reason. Right now sending out 2000 applications is the fate of some, well when it gets that hard, sending out 10-20k applications will actually become the new norm. Then it’ll get so hard, people will realize there’s no point to it, there’s might as well be no job market, then at that point UBI will come in, and AI will run the work based economy.
@@Wanderer2035it feels like a tragedy to have been born into a time that started so well yet plays out so badly
Heres me hoping it takes all jobs.
Then it lures you into thinking your life is superfluous.
I'm not worried that I'm going to lose my job. I'm worried that I'll be the only person still working when everyone else is living off of UBI.
Yes. Like when I was working and everyone was collecting Covid checks.
ubi means you'd be getting it too. its universal
@@dasit6034 good point. Aight. Well if that's how it's dished out I'll take it 😂
yes, thank god Im not a nurse anymore
Ppl will be envious of someone able to work
This is the party before everyone has to go home.
I'm wondering about that, too.
we’re so screwed, what will happen when all these displaced workers can’t afford the goods and services, no one has thought of that.
No jobs are safe. Seriously. This is exponential so whatever you think it can't do it can in one year.
This is just silly. You have no idea how AI works.
@@obaid5761 A year ago people were laughing about terrible AI art and videos, look at it now, it ramps up exponentially day by day and it will keep going for years
@WorstAbaYT We're still laughing. LLMs are incredibly expensive to train and sustain. Only experienced knowledge workers understand the frustrations of AI hallucinations. Output speed is decreased significantly, most of the time. Wake up and don't be mindless sheep, fooled by every marketing gimmick.
Landlord is pretty safe job, as far as you consider it as a job.
@@Georggggthats a great job, just own a bunch of homes in a place close to a college, infinite income.
I don't understand one thing. How is it possible that "Software and Applications Developers" is in low risk of replaceable according to this data, although all the people says that software developers will lost their jobs because of AI (12:04)
Cus there will be a few specialists that will be required to develop and improve the AI
Cause SWE is harder to replace entirely like other jobs .
The problem is swe is very crowded and competitive job rn so every economic problem or AI hype will effect it greatly .
I've been in software QA manual/automation for a few years now and just recently started to take courses on generative AI and machine learning. It'll take me a while, but I'm determined to gain skills and knowledge in this field
What are you planning to do when AI does your AI job?
And AI cant get a masters in AI? You seem to think you have this all figured out when in fact the original creators of AI had already been 4 steps ahead of you@@user-qd1fd7ei8h
Do you think AI has the potential to replace manual and automation testers?
you have a very clear skin
I'm planning to go for ms in aerospace engineering... should I continue that 😂
I don't see any degree and skills are safe from AI 😢 specially tech domain is already in a bad situation
Yes. There's still plenty to discover in that branch of the field. Even if you choose to not pursue that career later, the degree subject commands respect and will set you up well in your chosen path.
Great research!
I'd like to add (I might have missed it in the video, a lot of noise around where I am at at the moment watching this)
In general. The highest priority to keep in mind in a world of capitalism as a company is money and growth, companies are dependent on growth to survive, with the on-boarding AI companies will have to include both the cheaper (at least for now) AI and their personal (at least initially and a rather long time to come) to stay in the competition. The human tasks in those jobs will incrementally change direction, yes, that is really a no-brainer.
Health care and Medicine. It's true that AI will be superior finding new medicines etc, but someone have to give that medicine to the person needing it, and this will be a long process to exchange human interaction giving the medicine to the needing. The same thing goes for general health care, elder care. So here we'll see AI and humans work together, removing the error prone monkey paper work from the humans so they can focus on the humanity part.
Tech. As a senior developer myself, we're using AI at my company to bounce ideas with, and we have a strict policy not to copy paste what ever the AI spits out, the reason for this I will point out later down, which also touches the final aspect of AI for any job/career. It also is a perfect tool to learn new things which you might not have dug into previously or just personal knowledge increment or growth.
Banking / Finance. With the initial statement, money is the priority, yes, AI will be a huge actor in this sector, not least in the stock market, I guess the human roles here will shift into more supervising and optimization tasks.
Responsibility.
No jobs, except politics ;) There is a responsibility chain. There's responsibilities that companies expects from their workers, and the clients on the companies etc. AI can not remove the responsibility chain, so laying of human workers in favor of AI may end up with people just quit the job getting to much responsibility they can't count for, which then will bring the companies to earn less making it harder to stay in the game.
Cost of AI. Most companies wont have server parks running AI, but will use clouds... Demand and supply will probably make the use of AI gradually more expensive, and that's without any responsibility guaranty. This could actually turn very nasty very abrupt for many companies.
So, all in all, the sane way forward is to let the AI evolve and implement it carefully where you will see long term benefits without an increasing risk of things jumping uncontrollably the wrong direction. And my beliefs are that most established companies kind of gonna go that direction.
An insightful exploration and analysis of 'Job' titles/industries. What I'm more curious about is how job skills and job tasks will evolve over time. This is a more challenging problem, but also an opportunity to understand how an industry will change as technologies and services become commercialized.
Great advise (16:42) on how to self improve and leverage opportunities.
Arquitects, plumbers, electricians. Framers and carpenters, landscapers, irrigation technicians, chef's, cooks , cleaning and maintenance, apparel, assembly, machinists, farm and Ranch, construction and all manner of management, all these and probably many more are still needed and will never disappear!
All of these could be replaced by machines. Likely some of these will just not be in our lifetime
Very well reasoned and documented presentation, congratulations
Thank god for this channel 😭💛
I think AGI is being ignored here, any non physical jobs that do not focus on human relationships (architects, designers, software devs, analysts, ..., mainly office jobs) can be eliminated if AGI is developed (provided enough compute is available). AGI could also be combined with robots eliminating all physical labor related jobs. And this is ignoring that AGI can be used to create ASI in which case I really don't know what will happen.
"any non physical jobs that do not focus on human relationships". It's sorta wild to me that people don't think AI will be better at human relationships than humans. I'd expect an AI therapist to be way better than a human therapist in a few years.
I agree that they would be way better, but some people just want other people for certain types of services. Lets take sales, AI sales would do targeted ads really well, and could explain the product and even manipulate it's customers into buying the product but it would miss a certain trust factor that a human sales rep builds up over several weeks to months. I think depending on what is being sold AI will replace the sales rep or AI will not.
@@2007dinand Ah I see. Fair enough. I would definitely agree with everything you said. While I'd prefer the efficient product I know way more people that wouldn't give up a human barber shop lol.
not only that, but with massive unemployment and salaries plummeting in the remaining jobs people wont have money in their pockets, so small businneses will close in the the whole planet, and all this to make rich a few dudes
I still think most creative fields (especially UX design) are safe because the output is often subjective- with objective elements mixed in. This is why mixing code with art skills is so great.
This still gives a very small side of the picture as just because the jobs are not getting replaced doesn't mean their pay will remain same lol
Maybe programming isn't replaced but because its going to become so easy, it's supply will increase significantly
I disagree, because a lot of AI's programming side can be quite bad and if you don't have good skills understanding what it's showing you, you can jeopordise the project in no time. I think really skilled veterans will always be in the demand, but it will be harder to break into industry.
@@svetlanasygiainen5339 just because it isn't good now doesn't mean it won't be good in the future, ai is getting exponentially better it can make videos which is not just a combination of images in sequence it has to make sense using real world physics and images have to tie in together
Coding is nothing compared to that and is much easier lmao, have you read about what the ceo of nvidia has said?
I agree on your point that veterans will be necessary as coding isn't just programming it's much more than that but similarly videos is not a combination of images so you can't say for sure
0:15 Hard facts, no job is "AI proof."
Social workers, teachers, nurses will not be replaced in our lifetime. Mostly jobs no one wants to do.
@@pinkqueenscookie You know these, "not in our lifetimes" statements have a very bad track record of being accurate.
@@bujin5455 I mean, I’m not a god. I simply disagree with your statement based on the current trend of AI and human tendencies.
@@pinkqueenscookie I understand you disagree. But humans have proven repeatedly that we are SUPER bad at estimating exponential time scales. Back in the late 90s, when we were 20 years into the human genome project, we had only mapped 1% of the human genome, and experts were saying it would be another 200 years before the project was complete. We finished mapping the remain 99% in the following ten years. Now we can map your entire specific genome in less than 24 hours.
With exponentials, when you're 1% through the work, you're 50% through in time. Or more in the case given above.
AI is the fastest progressing technology in human history, and I think we're more 1% of the way toward replacing everyone's work. Now you can choose to believe it's not going to happen in our lifespans, but I think that's more wishful thinking, than actual thoughtful analysis.
@ Eh, wishful isn’t quite what I feel. I have money and do not have to technically work. I find joy in my job. AI is amazing and doing and will do scary things but teaching for example (children) is not just about imparting knowledge but a form of childcare. AI especially will have a hard time with children with disabilities, the ones in self-contained settings. Teaching involves collaboration with colleagues, parents, and administrators. These relationships often rely on human trust, communication, and understanding.
There is also the ethical part, replacing teachers with AI would face significant legal, ethical, and societal resistance, particularly in roles like special education.
I can go on but rather than wishful thinking I do not think creating teacher robots with very low chance of error and high enough quality to both teach during the unexpected and have empathy is not going to be a priority. I am not saying this will never happen, it’s just not likely to given how what I mentioned above and the cost to replace every teacher, assistant, admin, etc.
For teaching it can’t just be an iPad, you will have to have a high quality android. One children won’t be able to figure how to shut off or destroy lol. IMO by the time we are here we won’t be at the start of singularity anymore, we’ll be towards the end…
But hey, I do agree I could be wrong. Catch you in about 70-80 years?
I love the realistic (albeit brutal) outlook here. I appreciate you taking all that time to do the research and sharing your action plan
I’m in highschool and have been thinking of going into an environment related career so I’m really relieved that it won’t be replaced
Like Public Health
It's doctors only future unfortunately 😢
You may think you're safe from AI, but the reality is that it is a cascading effect. As people start losing jobs, they'll consume less, drive less, and use less services. this cuts the food, gas, maintenance, construction, automotive, travel, healthcare, and basically every industry out there. As AI/ML and robotics gets cheaper and better, more jobs will be replaced.
The fact is, that nobody knows if and to what extent this will happen. Nobody. It could reach the extent where it will replace human interaction, manipulate you to do things like make purchases that you wouldn't otherwise, behave in ways that you normally wouldn't do, etc. It could also turn out to be a big giant dud. It could be a very short or a very long timeline before this happens. Regardless, the more creative and flexible you are, the better off you'll be.
AI feels like a car slowly coming your way. You could do anything to prevent it from hitting you, but you'd rather do nothing and wait to see if you'll survive or not.
We literally cannot do anything about it now, it'll keep exponentially ramping up
Well, not us exactly.
I think your comment would be better if you said we were in a non moving van and most of us were tied up in the back unable to move while the drivers don’t move.
Tina, I just found your channel, and I just want to say that this video is incredible. It's so comprehensive and detailed and something I'd never expect to see in a RUclips video. It feels like you didn't just answer my question, you explained the process to answering my question and why the answer is the way it is. You just earned a sub!
Most important parts of the video:
3:20 - Tina’s top takeaways from the “Future of Jobs Report” (by The World Economic Forum).
7:45 - Tina’s top takeaways from the “Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work” report by the International Monetary Fund.
Thanks so much for making this video, Tina! Being able to piggy-back onto the hours of research you did, in just 18 minutes is immensely useful.
Wouldn't you be concerned gpt could hallucinate when merging the datasets? And then you'd still need to write python code to verify it didn't mess it up
I checked :)
Ah awesome :)
Doesnt this mean that there will forever be a need for someone to verify what the ai has produced is infact correct!
@@LiberatedNotesforever is a strong world, just like Internet, ai will continue to get better and at some point, it will be more useful and trustworthy than it’s now
Graphic designers will definitely be replaced after 6 years of experience my passion has fade away because everyone can do it its no demanding and a career change is calling me
Great Tina! Impressive research to prepare for this video. Nicely done!
Guys the thing is if jobs are getting lost means they have a cheaper and better replacement for humans but WE can also utilise this opportunity can’t we? It will be so eay to create new functioning companies quickly and cheaply and so on
Warning to people looking into teaching, if other countries are like Australia I can say the number of available jobs will be decreasing in the long term (a lot of government money and effort is actively being spent on Ai teaching initiatives, rural schooling is a bit of a test bed for it atm).
And with the qualifications being as expensive and time consuming as they are, 5-10 year projections are worth considering.
“Knowledge is power” has never been so wrong!
All jobs will be replaced(mostly) - Doctors, nurses, police, programmers, actors, drivers, chefs, mailman, designers etc.. and even judges at one point. There will be maybe one individual in each category, like, 1 doctor and 1 nurse in The Hospital, 1 policeman in every city, 1 Programmer in every country 🤣etc.. Because that's the idea of AI - everything automated
Short answer - everything
Because AI is just like humans but designed for a specific task so offcourse they will do it faster and effectively
but itxs just a chatbot marketed as an AI, so everything wil be fine
AI in a lot of cases will save businesses a lot of money and because humans can cause a lot issues in the workplace I would definitely use robots if I had a business. A robot could probably make an amazing burger
"If you are a security and you love your job go into robotics"
This was such a high quality video! Thank you
but I watched another video of yours saying that programmers will be fully replaced