My question is, if Mary is so holy and perfect, then why even have Jesus in the picture? Jesus, NOT Mary, came to save everyone from their sins for He Himself said, "I am the way the truth and the life, nobody comes to the father but through Me." He never said through my mother Mary or any other source, but through ME (Jesus) that's not to say that Mary was not a great woman of God but she is definitely not part of the Holy Trinity.
Because in the Old testament there's lots of talk about a man to become savior not a woman. So it wouldn't match and it would be inconsistent if it was just Mary. Plus old testament says he will come through a virgin. He came through an unmarked womb she was really pure. Also in the New testament and Old testament talks about priest happened to be pure. And Hebrews Jesus is the new priesthood through which we can go to. So its very deep. Keep reading keep learning. You will understand.
No orthodox Catholic or Orthodox ever did. From the Nestorian Church of the East to the Greek Orthodox to the Oriental Orthodox. Mary’s flesh gave rise to Christ’s Flesh, you don’t need an apocryphal text to know this. While Christ is the perfect sacrifice, Mary, who IS not divine at all and is just a human, would not have been sinful or stained of sin if her flesh gave rise to the perfect unblemished flesh of Christ. As for her perpetual virginity, the word “adelphos” does not mean Blood brother, since St Paul called his readers “adelphos”. But instead Mary had no male relatives, either by daughters marriage or sons themselves because John adopts her - Christ’s final act, his thoughts to His Mother! Also in that Gospel of John where Mary prompts Christ’s first miracle
John 19:25-27 Mary is clearly identified. Whilst I agree that the RC church has made a cult of Mary, ignore and change the 2nd Commandment and pray to many people other than God; Mary did give birth to (and raise) Jesus. She was found to be blessed among all women to do so. She was one of the few there at his crucifixion. Mark was not. So let's not cast aspersions on Mary's presence and existence
Mary is not "co-redeemer." the term in Catholicism (which has not been dogmatically defined) is "co-redemptrix" which does not mean "co-redeemer" as if Mary is another Savior.
@@Mirro.555 Luke 1:48 “For He hath regarded the low estate of His handmaiden; for behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.” you seem to lack understanding of the catholic view of Mary. we venerate her. she is the mother of our Lord and Savior Yeshua HaMashiach. Jesus loved her as His mother, so God loves her as His mother. this is why from the moment Mary was born she was free of original sin.
She was definitely not a co-redeemer. However, being chosen above all women to be the mother of Jesus is pretty significant! Mary knew who Jesus was, as the Angel advised. She lived in hiding in Egypt, was reminded, by Jesus, when she lost him and found him in the temple and WAS at the crucifixion, per John 19:25:27 . So, let's not be so quick to obsess on her insignificance like men in 1st century did with all women. She had plenty of insight.
Wrong. Protestants don't question devoción to Mary until the 17th century. Even the great heretics like Luther, Calvin and Zwingli had marian devotion.
Thank you! This scholarly review of those most early works concerning Mary which were passed about in the early Church is most interesting and informative. This historic core of the earliest popular devotions to Mary fills a great gap in the contemporary presentation of Marian Devotion which has come to take such a prominent position in the way the Church presents the Faith.
Very clear that we get honor to Blessed Virgin Mary as mother of Jesus because she took care of Jesus for more than 30 years and their journey from Jerusalem to Nazareth was highly known healing miracles during those times.
6:13 - the author says marry treasured these things in her heart, “a suggestion that marry had special insight of Jesus’ mission.” the Angel Gabriel told her way back in Luke 1:31-32. That doesnt imply she’s holy, it implies that she knew because of the angel.
He is referring to a specific incident. Jesus saved the reputation of the groom. That is a fact. It does not detract from the what His main mission is - to die for our sins and to save us.
One flaw Matthew,Mark,Luke,and John was not written by Matthew ,Mark,Luke,or John respectively so therefore to say Mark said this,or Mark said that is inaccurate.One could say it says in Mark ,or it is written in Mark,but we have no idea what Mark actually said.
The killing of Adami and replacing them with lower belly button snakes is what got so many people crucified and melted under lava. God still reigns in power.
Mary wasn’t just an avenue. She is in fact the Mother of God. In Jesus’s incarnation, He took on two natures, divine and human. This made Him true God and true man. Mary is the mother of His human nature. His divine nature has always existed because God had no beginning. And just to clarify, it was the Son of God who became man, not the Trinity. Therefore Mary is the mother of Jesus Christ’s human nature which indeed makes her the Mother Of God.
@@annemariebrewster2626 it is incorrect to divide two natures of Christ, thus it is incorrect to say Mary was the mother of His human nature. The two natures of Jesus Christ are inseparable, because He is one person. So, to say Mary is the mother of God is incorrect, because He is not only God but also a man.
Absolutely. But you know that the churches are following Mathew Mark Luke and John and they're also following Paul.. which all point to Jesus. So does marry she points to Jesus. There's nothing wrong with honoring all the disciples for giving us the gift of the word to know Jesus more.
Very informative. Thank you. Just one questionWhy would you say "yoachim" yet pronounce Joseph and Jesus's names, with a hard J? Logically, the names should have uniformity in translation, as they would in the actuality of the writer
In the lost books of the Bible, Jesus performs miracles since birth. There was no mention of Mary Magdalene in these books. She would not have had an intimate relationship with Jesus because of her past. Inspite of Jesus's defiance he still defers to Jewish law. Don't forget the accusations that he healed on the Sabbath, they were considered sacreligous.
The brothers were cousins of Jesus most probably. This explains the "other Mary". No writer will be disrespectful that much to call mother of Jesus "the other Mary"...
There is nothing impossible to God.. as to Mary as the Virgin Mother of the man-God, the Catholics believe in it.. so, whatever non-believers say, (in any way).. can't influence us ... regarding miracles thru the Blessed Virgin Mary, I personally was healed from a certain illness years ago by just praying thru Her intercession... and all of the miracles that's happening at the grotto of Lourdes... and the miracles at Fatima... etc..after all, isn't Mary the channel of all graces ...?
Incredible green screen, it's indistinguishable from reality. For quite some time, I thought he was REALLY in that room, flanked by REAL gigantic scrolls. Mindblowing! jk I know greenscreen is hard to do right haha
a·poc·ry·phal /əˈpäkrəfəl/ adjective (of a story or statement) of doubtful authenticity, although widely circulated as being true. Similar: fictitious made-up untrue fabricated false spurious imaginary mythical legendary dubious doubtful debatable questionable unverified unauthenticated unsubstantiated unsupported Opposite: authentic true of or belonging to the Apocrypha. "the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas"
Word my brother .. as for me I see the creator in my dreams almost every day .. he says I'm a gentleman and that I should keep being a trustworthy person .. don't pray for miracles .. pray for daily miracles.. and sometimes it's not what the lord can do for us .. it's about what we can do for the lord how can we assist him with his wellbeing.. do this and you will se miracles often .. in the name of King Jesus !!!
Yeah I think that Mary should have had a special role because without her Jesus wouldn't have been here cuz if he could have come without a mother he would have
That's not true at all she was chosen to be the mother of Jesus but by no means does that limit what God can do, he is omnipotent he could have done it without her. She was one chosen from many that's all.
Paul the earliest author of Christian scriptures does not mention Mary as the mother of Jesus. Mark the earliest biographer of Jesus doe not mention Mary as the mother of Jesus. John the last written gospel does not give the name of the mother of Jesus. Only Matthew and Luke mention the name of Mary BY NAME. Then there are the other non economical gospels.
"Cult" implies ritualistic actions. Unless there are churches that do regular worship specifically to Mary then it's not a cult. Going to church every Sunday and other ritualistic actions are considered cult behavior though. So, saying "Cult of Jesus" is more appropriate than a denominational belief in Mary's role in the fictions. The Bible is poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions and the jesus stories were definitely invented by Rome.
Poorly plagiarized? From what exactly? Cuz last i remember since the beginning of time there was just Judaism and polytheistic paganism, to which paganism came after Judaism Invented by rome? Even though his coming was prophesied in the old testament several times before the roman empire was around? Preforming customs/rituals doesn't automatically make things a cult.
I find it very intriguing that scholars almost always neglect to tell the whole story but emphasize on the pieces that suit their narrative.Let me tell you a story.There was once an old man named Jusuf that lost his wife,as accustomed to these lands even to recent days he married a sixteen year old girl name Miriam.Jusuf had a bunch of kids from his first wife and a boy from Miriam.They lived in troubled times.Romans ruled their known world and everyone who opposed them was beaten,tortured or killed.Their son grew up to be a fine young man,and he had to rebel against the status quo and so he did peacefully.Most know the rest of his story but most don't know that the Greeks living in these lands called they boy Iasus which meant the healer because he was one.Also most people don't know that Greeks much later worshiped him and called his Christos which means anointed so the young man went down to history with those two names the anointed healer from Nazareth translated in English as Jesus Christ of Nazareth.Moving forward Jesus ideas been spread to the Roman world through his apostles gaining more and more followers that only longed for the end of violence and miss treatment.At the same time Dioclician first realizes that this is not gonna work they either need to change the way they rule or the empire will just crumple.He realized that the only way was the Greek way so he decided to move the capital of the roman empire.He didn't finish that job but one of his successors Constantine did.Constantine also realized that this new religion would hold the key to resurrect the empire,unite the people,give them hope and lead on to prosperity.After all this new religion just crowned him emperor.Been the wise man that he was he moved the capital to Byzantion renamed it Constantine's City (Constantinupolis) established the new religion as the formal religion of the empire but at the same time gave all the citizens the ability to worship anything they liked without repercussions and peace and prosperity started to show again in the empire.Or so he thought.The new religion now called christianism is growing in followers exponentially but even thought it preaches peace love justice and equality still there's something missing.You see women at this time through most of the world are suffering.There was a place thought that women were not lesser than men and that was Greece,there women were revered,they studied at the academies,they had equal political rights as men they had fortune (side note to be fair Egyptian women shared that privilege also)etc.Not in every city but in most of them.So far there is only the God and his Son.They replaced they void Zeus-Jupiter left behind.But the human nature is binary.Someone needs to fill the void of the female goddesses and represent the female nature.And there comes in Mary the virgin mother of the son of God.There in Byzantium they start preaching about her and suddenly she has all the virtues of the old goddesses.She is the mother figure and loyal wife like Hera,tends to the poor and the ones in need like Demetra,they even called her General like Athena but she doesn't have any of the human flaws of those goddesses.They even went as far as to give her a Greek name Maria (Mary) instead of her actual Miriam.And that's how the mother came into the picture,a feminine aspect of the divine to bring back the lost social balance.A social balance lost to those other religions that followed the same one God narrative but did not have their Mary or their own version of a divine feminine figure.Now I understand that some people might find that story offensive,some might say it is blasphemy and so on but you see the deference between this story and the others is that this story is our history.I just wonder why no one tells that story.
Because they are scared. Satan does not want us to know the whole truth. The bible tells us that when the Lord returns the 2 witnesses will preach the "whole gospel to all the world" and that "all biblical mysteries will be revealed and understood". Evilness tried to hide the comeplete truth but the Lord is revealing more and more to us and we need to know it should have never been removed. The Lord also says whoever takes from the words of this book I will take from him and whoever adds to the words of this book I'll add the plagues to him.
We'll see there's alot of gaps in theese stories ... Coz all the gospels were not considered and that is a sin .. furthermore they say when Miriam had Jesus she went on to continue her marital duties and had other kids as well ... Or something ... And Saint Paul was quarrelling with one of Jesus blood brothers regarding the Hebrew laws ... Now .. was that his older brother or younger brother I am not sure
I can see how protestantes would struggle to understand the Catholic Faith in relation to the communion of Saints.Marty's, or Miracles.I find the protestante world void of any Spirituality that reaches beyond the few favorite verses in the Bible that best fits their life styles.Sad.
As someone who grew up in Protestant churches i can say for a fact that we do see miracles and movement of the holy spirit quite often and we understand how the catholic church works, perhaps not all do, but for the most part we do understand how Catholicism works and what they believe considering most of them left catholicism and became protestants especially in the Hispanic churches it is a very common thing. Biblically speaking the basis of common catholic beliefs contradict the bible, just to name some there are: 1. Placing mary to the level of God and worshiping her 2. Pagan customs which were never ordained by God such as, ash wednesday, christmas, and easter 3. Having a pope who is supposedly the mediator between God and man 4. Confessing to a priest to have your sins forgiven rather than praying directly to God to ask for forgiveness in Jesus name so that you may be forgiven 5. The changing and adding to the bible which is forbidden as said in revelations.
This right here is exactly what i have argued with several people but I'm not sure why they just don't get it. They always find a way to excuse it or twist the bible to defend it, sadly
I don't think that Mary Mother of Real Jesus was a hymen having virgin, but His conception was immaculate and miraculous. It's interesting bc some texts refer to the imposter as "Ugly Mother." The Apocrypha must still be missing some information, bc The Ugly Mary was always trying to usurp Mother Mary and steal from her, switching identities and killing Adami. Even Nero had gotten switched with an imposter. Magdelena had an imposter, she was a generation younger than Mother Mary. In regular Protestantism, they vaguely refer to "The Three Mary's." But they were not a group. The real Magdelena was beautiful and sweet and in the generation. Mother Mary Mother of Jesus was often taken and replaced by the imposter Ugly Mary. Long story short, the infrastructure and government of various places started to crumble and show bad ethos, Ugly Mary's son got crucified, long after other events, then they crucified a bunch of people, some upside down, got rid of the imposter Nero, and a bunch of imposter ass half snakes died horrible deaths. The only issue was their souls. Black holes.
So having all the points of view so that I can make an educated decision for myself isn't as important as you not being able to get past your own personal opinions. Ok
Should anyone be interested, Jesus' virgin birth is certainly not unique. If you take the time to do a little research, you will discover other virgin births, some of which are from far closer to the present day.
I wonder why none of these so called scholars ever talk about ulfilas Bible translated for the Goths and visgoths in the 4th century it has nothing about Mary or no Jesus of Nazareth ulfilas was a Arian priest and inventor of the gothic alphabet ...
The Gospels were written by human beings and the versions we have today have been translated from Aramaic into Greek before making it into English. Biblical literalism is a phenomenon of the 20th century. The early Church fathers had no problem with interpreting some parts of the Bible as allegorical. If you're a Biblical literalist you're basically saying that the people who wrote the Gospels were perfect, which of course goes against the very foundation of Christian belief, ie that we are incapable of perfection because of original sin.
@@valmarsiglia what is your source on the synoptics gospels being written in armaic? As i have read it was written in greek and thats the langauge of the earliest surviving manuscripts.
Mary had two other children. Therefore she did not remain a virgin.
My question is, if Mary is so holy and perfect, then why even have Jesus in the picture? Jesus, NOT Mary, came to save everyone from their sins for He Himself said, "I am the way the truth and the life, nobody comes to the father but through Me." He never said through my mother Mary or any other source, but through ME (Jesus) that's not to say that Mary was not a great woman of God but she is definitely not part of the Holy Trinity.
Because it was jesus's rule
@@Bakedea87 go back and read the scriptures again…
Because in the Old testament there's lots of talk about a man to become savior not a woman. So it wouldn't match and it would be inconsistent if it was just Mary. Plus old testament says he will come through a virgin. He came through an unmarked womb she was really pure. Also in the New testament and Old testament talks about priest happened to be pure. And Hebrews Jesus is the new priesthood through which we can go to. So its very deep. Keep reading keep learning. You will understand.
No orthodox Catholic or Orthodox ever did. From the Nestorian Church of the East to the Greek Orthodox to the Oriental Orthodox.
Mary’s flesh gave rise to Christ’s
Flesh, you don’t need an apocryphal text to know this. While Christ is the perfect sacrifice, Mary, who IS not divine at all and is just a human, would not have been sinful or stained of sin if her flesh gave rise to the perfect unblemished flesh of Christ.
As for her perpetual virginity, the word “adelphos” does not mean Blood brother, since St Paul called his readers “adelphos”. But instead Mary had no male relatives, either by daughters marriage or sons themselves because John adopts her - Christ’s final act, his thoughts to His Mother! Also in that Gospel of John where Mary prompts Christ’s first miracle
@@chrystalstewart5519 you're kind of proving his point.
John 19:25-27 Mary is clearly identified.
Whilst I agree that the RC church has made a cult of Mary, ignore and change the 2nd Commandment and pray to many people other than God; Mary did give birth to (and raise) Jesus.
She was found to be blessed among all women to do so.
She was one of the few there at his crucifixion. Mark was not.
So let's not cast aspersions on Mary's presence and existence
jesus was before creating of World
I can't understand why God's Choice of The Mother of His Son Jesus Christ, wouldn't be Blessed in God's Eyes!
Doesn't mean she's a mediator
The only insight mary had regarding Yashua’s mission was the fact that an angel told her he is the Messiah. She is NOT a redemptrix or co-redeemer.
Mary is not "co-redeemer." the term in Catholicism (which has not been dogmatically defined) is "co-redemptrix" which does not mean "co-redeemer" as if Mary is another Savior.
@@HeroQuestFans the endings of the words are different, but the meaning is the same.
@@Mirro.555 Luke 1:48 “For He hath regarded the low estate of His handmaiden; for behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.” you seem to lack understanding of the catholic view of Mary. we venerate her. she is the mother of our Lord and Savior Yeshua HaMashiach. Jesus loved her as His mother, so God loves her as His mother. this is why from the moment Mary was born she was free of original sin.
People are mixing up the devine mother and fleshly mother of Jesus. I see nothing wrong with venerating the devine Mother.
She was definitely not a co-redeemer. However, being chosen above all women to be the mother of Jesus is pretty significant!
Mary knew who Jesus was, as the Angel advised. She lived in hiding in Egypt, was reminded, by Jesus, when she lost him and found him in the temple and WAS at the crucifixion,
per John 19:25:27 . So, let's not be so quick to obsess on her insignificance like men in 1st century did with all women. She had plenty of insight.
Wrong. Protestants don't question devoción to Mary until the 17th century. Even the great heretics like Luther, Calvin and Zwingli had marian devotion.
Thank you! This scholarly review of those most early works concerning Mary which were passed about in the early Church is most interesting and informative. This historic core of the earliest popular devotions to Mary fills a great gap in the contemporary presentation of Marian Devotion which has come to take such a prominent position in the way the Church presents the Faith.
Very clear that we get honor to Blessed Virgin Mary as mother of Jesus because she took care of Jesus for more than 30 years and their journey from Jerusalem to Nazareth was highly known healing miracles during those times.
6:13 - the author says marry treasured these things in her heart, “a suggestion that marry had special insight of Jesus’ mission.”
the Angel Gabriel told her way back in Luke 1:31-32. That doesnt imply she’s holy, it implies that she knew because of the angel.
Yes she was holy she was set apart. Thats all Holy means Absolutely when we are God's children We Are Holy.
Weird when the fan fiction is better than the main story
Turning the water into wine and saving the party... Whoa.... Jesus saved lives I wonder if this guy is Bible based ♥️ 💯😉
He certainly is. His name is Jesus and what started with a wedding 👰 will also End with a Wedding. And it is the Third Day. 😉
He is referring to a specific incident. Jesus saved the reputation of the groom. That is a fact. It does not detract from the what His main mission is - to die for our sins and to save us.
Very informative, I can clearly see why the reformers did not accept the apocryphal books as scripture.
One flaw Matthew,Mark,Luke,and John was not written by Matthew ,Mark,Luke,or John respectively so therefore to say Mark said this,or Mark said that is inaccurate.One could say it says in Mark ,or it is written in Mark,but we have no idea what Mark actually said.
A great angel appeard? Mm.. this sound familiar 🤔 Mohammed story, Joseph Smith (mormon).
"Who are you?"
Angel: "that's a secret"
She witnessed everything.
The killing of Adami and replacing them with lower belly button snakes is what got so many people crucified and melted under lava.
God still reigns in power.
Nice work. The only issue was that he needed some citations.
I find this explanations more interesting than the canonical scriptures.
We are to follow Jesus not man. Mary was the avenue in which the Messiah came into the world. GOD does not have a mother.🐑
Mary wasn’t just an avenue. She is in fact the Mother of God. In Jesus’s incarnation, He took on two natures, divine and human. This made Him true God and true man. Mary is the mother of His human nature. His divine nature has always existed because God had no beginning. And just to clarify, it was the Son of God who became man, not the Trinity. Therefore Mary is the mother of Jesus Christ’s human nature which indeed makes her the Mother Of God.
@@annemariebrewster2626 it is incorrect to divide two natures of Christ, thus it is incorrect to say Mary was the mother of His human nature. The two natures of Jesus Christ are inseparable, because He is one person. So, to say Mary is the mother of God is incorrect, because He is not only God but also a man.
Thanks for the clarification 😊 there's a FATHER the SON and the holy spirit 🙏♥️🙏 ♥️AMEN
Absolutely. But you know that the churches are following Mathew Mark Luke and John and they're also following Paul.. which all point to Jesus. So does marry she points to Jesus. There's nothing wrong with honoring all the disciples for giving us the gift of the word to know Jesus more.
Is this the only episode of this series available?
Very informative. Thank you.
Just one questionWhy would you say "yoachim" yet pronounce Joseph and Jesus's names, with a hard J? Logically, the names should have uniformity in translation, as they would in the actuality of the writer
It happened with Elijah's name as well where we say eligh-zhuh instead of eligh-juh.
Its pronounced with a hard J !! Obv
In the lost books of the Bible, Jesus performs miracles since birth. There was no mention of Mary Magdalene in these books. She would not have had an intimate relationship with Jesus because of her past. Inspite of Jesus's defiance he still defers to Jewish law. Don't forget the accusations that he healed on the Sabbath, they were considered sacreligous.
The brothers were cousins of Jesus most probably. This explains the "other Mary". No writer will be disrespectful that much to call mother of Jesus "the other Mary"...
Mauro Leonardo Mondal He had brothers, mary had other children with Joseph, please get over that. Mary was not some eternal virgin.
There is nothing impossible to God.. as to Mary as the Virgin Mother of the man-God, the Catholics believe in it.. so, whatever non-believers say, (in any way).. can't influence us ... regarding miracles thru the Blessed Virgin Mary, I personally was healed from a certain illness years ago by just praying thru Her intercession... and all of the miracles that's happening at the grotto of Lourdes... and the miracles at Fatima... etc..after all, isn't Mary the channel of all graces ...?
Incredible green screen, it's indistinguishable from reality. For quite some time, I thought he was REALLY in that room, flanked by REAL gigantic scrolls.
Mindblowing!
jk I know greenscreen is hard to do right haha
a·poc·ry·phal
/əˈpäkrəfəl/
adjective
(of a story or statement) of doubtful authenticity, although widely circulated as being true.
Similar:
fictitious
made-up
untrue
fabricated
false
spurious
imaginary
mythical
legendary
dubious
doubtful
debatable
questionable
unverified
unauthenticated
unsubstantiated
unsupported
Opposite:
authentic
true
of or belonging to the Apocrypha.
"the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas"
A definition according to who?
@@gu3sswh075According to a dictionary of course, which idk either. Doesn't change that its still true tho
67 miracles at Lurdes, not counting my own.
What is your miracle ? I would love to hear it.
Word my brother .. as for me I see the creator in my dreams almost every day .. he says I'm a gentleman and that I should keep being a trustworthy person .. don't pray for miracles .. pray for daily miracles.. and sometimes it's not what the lord can do for us .. it's about what we can do for the lord how can we assist him with his wellbeing.. do this and you will se miracles often .. in the name of King Jesus !!!
Thank you
If you just had a baby, there would be no way to tell that someone is still a virgin.
Yeah I think that Mary should have had a special role because without her Jesus wouldn't have been here cuz if he could have come without a mother he would have
That's not true at all she was chosen to be the mother of Jesus but by no means does that limit what God can do, he is omnipotent he could have done it without her. She was one chosen from many that's all.
Paul the earliest author of Christian scriptures does not mention Mary as the mother of Jesus. Mark the earliest biographer of Jesus doe not mention Mary as the mother of Jesus. John the last written gospel does not give the name of the mother of Jesus. Only Matthew and Luke mention the name of Mary BY NAME. Then there are the other non economical gospels.
I thought Jesus was said to have a twin. THOMAS
She is a Virgin because she was impregnated by the holly spirit. She gave life to a Rock which became Gold. our Christ
"Cult" implies ritualistic actions. Unless there are churches that do regular worship specifically to Mary then it's not a cult. Going to church every Sunday and other ritualistic actions are considered cult behavior though. So, saying "Cult of Jesus" is more appropriate than a denominational belief in Mary's role in the fictions. The Bible is poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions and the jesus stories were definitely invented by Rome.
Yet the Hebrew scriptures that have been found are way older than roman church.. so that wouldn't work..
Poorly plagiarized?
From what exactly? Cuz last i remember since the beginning of time there was just Judaism and polytheistic paganism, to which paganism came after Judaism
Invented by rome?
Even though his coming was prophesied in the old testament several times before the roman empire was around?
Preforming customs/rituals doesn't automatically make things a cult.
The uncaused cause has a mother?
The uncaused cause's human body had a mother.
This is sadly a lengthy discourse of deception.
Read the Bible, it is the Word of God ❤
I find it very intriguing that scholars almost always neglect to tell the whole story but emphasize on the pieces that suit their narrative.Let me tell you a story.There was once an old man named Jusuf that lost his wife,as accustomed to these lands even to recent days he married a sixteen year old girl name Miriam.Jusuf had a bunch of kids from his first wife and a boy from Miriam.They lived in troubled times.Romans ruled their known world and everyone who opposed them was beaten,tortured or killed.Their son grew up to be a fine young man,and he had to rebel against the status quo and so he did peacefully.Most know the rest of his story but most don't know that the Greeks living in these lands called they boy Iasus which meant the healer because he was one.Also most people don't know that Greeks much later worshiped him and called his Christos which means anointed so the young man went down to history with those two names the anointed healer from Nazareth translated in English as Jesus Christ of Nazareth.Moving forward Jesus ideas been spread to the Roman world through his apostles gaining more and more followers that only longed for the end of violence and miss treatment.At the same time Dioclician first realizes that this is not gonna work they either need to change the way they rule or the empire will just crumple.He realized that the only way was the Greek way so he decided to move the capital of the roman empire.He didn't finish that job but one of his successors Constantine did.Constantine also realized that this new religion would hold the key to resurrect the empire,unite the people,give them hope and lead on to prosperity.After all this new religion just crowned him emperor.Been the wise man that he was he moved the capital to Byzantion renamed it Constantine's City (Constantinupolis) established the new religion as the formal religion of the empire but at the same time gave all the citizens the ability to worship anything they liked without repercussions and peace and prosperity started to show again in the empire.Or so he thought.The new religion now called christianism is growing in followers exponentially but even thought it preaches peace love justice and equality still there's something missing.You see women at this time through most of the world are suffering.There was a place thought that women were not lesser than men and that was Greece,there women were revered,they studied at the academies,they had equal political rights as men they had fortune (side note to be fair Egyptian women shared that privilege also)etc.Not in every city but in most of them.So far there is only the God and his Son.They replaced they void Zeus-Jupiter left behind.But the human nature is binary.Someone needs to fill the void of the female goddesses and represent the female nature.And there comes in Mary the virgin mother of the son of God.There in Byzantium they start preaching about her and suddenly she has all the virtues of the old goddesses.She is the mother figure and loyal wife like Hera,tends to the poor and the ones in need like Demetra,they even called her General like Athena but she doesn't have any of the human flaws of those goddesses.They even went as far as to give her a Greek name Maria (Mary) instead of her actual Miriam.And that's how the mother came into the picture,a feminine aspect of the divine to bring back the lost social balance.A social balance lost to those other religions that followed the same one God narrative but did not have their Mary or their own version of a divine feminine figure.Now I understand that some people might find that story offensive,some might say it is blasphemy and so on but you see the deference between this story and the others is that this story is our history.I just wonder why no one tells that story.
Because they are scared. Satan does not want us to know the whole truth. The bible tells us that when the Lord returns the 2 witnesses will preach the "whole gospel to all the world" and that "all biblical mysteries will be revealed and understood". Evilness tried to hide the comeplete truth but the Lord is revealing more and more to us and we need to know it should have never been removed. The Lord also says whoever takes from the words of this book I will take from him and whoever adds to the words of this book I'll add the plagues to him.
Can you send me this info or where i can find it. Tough to find good valid sources on the web.
This story makes sense. People will believe any narrative blindly.
We'll see there's alot of gaps in theese stories ... Coz all the gospels were not considered and that is a sin .. furthermore they say when Miriam had Jesus she went on to continue her marital duties and had other kids as well ... Or something ... And Saint Paul was quarrelling with one of Jesus blood brothers regarding the Hebrew laws ... Now .. was that his older brother or younger brother I am not sure
They don’t tell this one because parts of it aren’t accurate.
I can see how protestantes would struggle to understand the Catholic Faith in relation to the communion of Saints.Marty's, or Miracles.I find the protestante world void of any Spirituality that reaches beyond the few favorite verses in the Bible that best fits their life styles.Sad.
As someone who grew up in Protestant churches i can say for a fact that we do see miracles and movement of the holy spirit quite often and we understand how the catholic church works, perhaps not all do, but for the most part we do understand how Catholicism works and what they believe considering most of them left catholicism and became protestants especially in the Hispanic churches it is a very common thing.
Biblically speaking the basis of common catholic beliefs contradict the bible, just to name some there are:
1. Placing mary to the level of God and worshiping her
2. Pagan customs which were never ordained by God such as, ash wednesday, christmas, and easter
3. Having a pope who is supposedly the mediator between God and man
4. Confessing to a priest to have your sins forgiven rather than praying directly to God to ask for forgiveness in Jesus name so that you may be forgiven
5. The changing and adding to the bible which is forbidden as said in revelations.
One of the most blasphemous and absurd practices. Mary adoration
Blatant red flag that Rome is NOT Christian
This right here is exactly what i have argued with several people but I'm not sure why they just don't get it. They always find a way to excuse it or twist the bible to defend it, sadly
I don't think that Mary Mother of Real Jesus was a hymen having virgin, but His conception was immaculate and miraculous.
It's interesting bc some texts refer to the imposter as "Ugly Mother."
The Apocrypha must still be missing some information, bc The Ugly Mary was always trying to usurp Mother Mary and steal from her, switching identities and killing Adami. Even Nero had gotten switched with an imposter. Magdelena had an imposter, she was a generation younger than Mother Mary.
In regular Protestantism, they vaguely refer to "The Three Mary's." But they were not a group. The real Magdelena was beautiful and sweet and in the generation. Mother Mary Mother of Jesus was often taken and replaced by the imposter Ugly Mary.
Long story short, the infrastructure and government of various places started to crumble and show bad ethos, Ugly Mary's son got crucified, long after other events, then they crucified a bunch of people, some upside down, got rid of the imposter Nero, and a bunch of imposter ass half snakes died horrible deaths.
The only issue was their souls.
Black holes.
So having all the points of view so that I can make an educated decision for myself isn't as important as you not being able to get past your own personal opinions. Ok
Jesus equals Zeus serapis don't get it twisted ...
Should anyone be interested, Jesus' virgin birth is certainly not unique. If you take the time to do a little research, you will discover other virgin births, some of which are from far closer to the present day.
I wonder why none of these so called scholars ever talk about ulfilas Bible translated for the Goths and visgoths in the 4th century it has nothing about Mary or no Jesus of Nazareth ulfilas was a Arian priest and inventor of the gothic alphabet ...
this guy is claiming mathew and luke liars no christian denies any verse of divine written scripture
Darrell Johnson the gospels are contradictory open your eyes
The Gospels were written by human beings and the versions we have today have been translated from Aramaic into Greek before making it into English. Biblical literalism is a phenomenon of the 20th century. The early Church fathers had no problem with interpreting some parts of the Bible as allegorical. If you're a Biblical literalist you're basically saying that the people who wrote the Gospels were perfect, which of course goes against the very foundation of Christian belief, ie that we are incapable of perfection because of original sin.
@@valmarsiglia Critical scholarship has shown that the canonical gospels were originally written in highly educated koine Greek, not Aramaic.
@@valmarsiglia what is your source on the synoptics gospels being written in armaic? As i have read it was written in greek and thats the langauge of the earliest surviving manuscripts.
Topcliffe The Bible was written through the inspiration of God. They are most certainly perfect. To deny such is to deny Christianity.
Furthermore I would think that it takes a goddess to be able to have a god
😁
Why is this religious nonsense here. This is all nonsence about nonsence
Need more attention? Seriously you see the topic of the video and decide to sit here and make a comment like this? Shame, just utter shame.
Define Gnosis
Knowledge
Mary is the BEST thing in the Bible.
No, Jesus is the best thing in the bible not mary
Jesus was a wandering preacher who was tried and condemned for the crime of blasphemy under Jewish Law. End of story.
James Richard Wiley yep he wasn't God nor born of a virgin
Chances are, that's an accurate assessment.
And he rose again. End of story.
🙄🤦🏾♀️
christian or not, believer or not that is not the end of the story.
that one person had more effect on the world than any king.