Next Video: ruclips.net/video/3RwUIP9pMSo/видео.html Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/ Full-Length Math & Science Videos: www.patreon.com/mathsciencetutor/collections
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a lengthy video/lecture on Polar Equations of Conic Sections in Polar Coordinates in Calculus Two. This is one of the first time that I can remember seeing in great detail how to graph polar equations of conic sections in polar coordinates by hand only. Pattern recognition really helps with understanding this classic material in Calculus. This is an error free video/lecture on RUclips TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
Excellent video, very clear and concise methods for solving these problems. This will help me earn the A on my test following the weekend. Thank you and keep up the great work.
bro i saw the white background and didn't think it was you, I thought It was over for me, I would never be able to understand this topic, until i saw the channel that posted the vid... ;)
I also don’t understand how you can just add a rectangular vertical line to a POLAR PLANE (edit: probably just notation now that I think about it)! Isn’t the whole point of the polar plane to sketch curves? Doesn’t make sense!
He also isn’t converting the polar coordinates to rectangular coordinates when converting to rectangular equations. I don’t know if the rules between circles and the other conic sections are different or if I’m just stupid 😅
Thank you for this awesome explainer. At 12:20, did you mean that our value calculated for r(pi) = 2 = distance from VERTEX to focus F_1 (i.e. (0,0) our graphs's origin)? I ask because isn't "c" the distance between our ellipses center point and either foci? I'm working on a different example (still ed/(#-(e)cosΘ) ), but got different values for r(pi) and "c".
It appears cartesian and radial coordinates are "mixed" on the same diagram. For example, the left vertex is labeled -2 yet it was calculated based on a radial theta of pi.
why dont you have to convert the directrix into a polar coordinate when graphing it?? why are you allowed to keep it as x=-6, y=4, etc, when you are on a graph that exists in terms of (r,theta)?
Next Video: ruclips.net/video/3RwUIP9pMSo/видео.html
Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/
Full-Length Math & Science Videos: www.patreon.com/mathsciencetutor/collections
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a lengthy video/lecture on Polar Equations of Conic Sections in Polar Coordinates in Calculus Two. This is one of the first time that I can remember seeing in great detail how to graph polar equations of conic sections in polar coordinates by hand only. Pattern recognition really helps with understanding this classic material in Calculus. This is an error free video/lecture on RUclips TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
You are great teacher,your explanation is top,top,top it is gift from almighty God,it is great contribuition of humanity.
You're an AMAZING teacher!!!! I admire your ease, depth and style which is so well demonstrated on all your wonderful videos!!! THANK YOU!!!
My fu**ing math teacher is so bad at explaining. You are so good at it. Thanks a lot.
Mine too
Anyone who has proper words to describe how good and helping this man is to challenge me and describe him using the same words
Final next week, great explanation man
I learned more from this video than in my precalc book
This made it a lot easier to understand, thank you so much :)
You are definitely sent by God😊 I didn't understand at all but Watching this video I understood within minutes 😊
THe king of Math and science thank you, you are always great for ever(THe winds from Great Somalia)
this video clears my all doubts thanks!!
Excellent video, very clear and concise methods for solving these problems. This will help me earn the A on my test following the weekend. Thank you and keep up the great work.
Thanks Brother. You sorted out all my doubts in one damn video. Hats off!!
Man are doing great work.
JG you are a work of art😎
Great explanations. Thank you.
You're welcome
Excellent method of teaching. Than you very much
Thank you for the videos ! I m from belgium ! You are a genius!
Love you Sirr...may you live long🤲❤❤
Hey Professor, thanks for this amazing video 💞. My doubts are gone now 😇. You are really great 🫡
Great video mate! But c is the distance from the centre of the ellipse (not from vertex) to the focal point if I may.
No it is not.
u help me with everything all the time
bro i saw the white background and didn't think it was you, I thought It was over for me, I would never be able to understand this topic, until i saw the channel that posted the vid... ;)
Great video! "E-centricity" lol
your videos are quite effective.greatt
Wow.the explanation is on point.thank you for the awesome video-like always.
Splendid explanation.Thanks a lot sir
you make math seem easy
Thanks Man. Your videos are so great.
you the real MVP
nice work man thanks
Very. Very. Helpful.
YOUR UNDERRATED.
how the heck is it legal to use _e_ as a variable name. thats like using π as a variable name.
I also don’t understand how you can just add a rectangular vertical line to a POLAR PLANE (edit: probably just notation now that I think about it)! Isn’t the whole point of the polar plane to sketch curves? Doesn’t make sense!
He also isn’t converting the polar coordinates to rectangular coordinates when converting to rectangular equations. I don’t know if the rules between circles and the other conic sections are different or if I’m just stupid 😅
ALWAYS LOVE YOUR VIDEOOOOO
Grrrreeeaaaaat
Thankyou so much 👍
You are good man
Great explanation🙏
Great work
Great stuff!
Thanks so much, you’re the best
Thanks man. Great video.
Thank you for this awesome explainer.
At 12:20, did you mean that our value calculated for r(pi) = 2 = distance from VERTEX to focus F_1 (i.e. (0,0) our graphs's origin)?
I ask because isn't "c" the distance between our ellipses center point and either foci? I'm working on a different example (still ed/(#-(e)cosΘ) ), but got different values for r(pi) and "c".
Who is here for Engineering Mathematics??
me
It appears cartesian and radial coordinates are "mixed" on the same diagram. For example, the left vertex is labeled -2 yet it was calculated based on a radial theta of pi.
Big Like for a great lecture (y) Thanks a lot bro... You've got a subscriber
Thank you very much
Thank you soo much !
why dont you have to convert the directrix into a polar coordinate when graphing it?? why are you allowed to keep it as x=-6, y=4, etc, when you are on a graph that exists in terms of (r,theta)?
are you god? thank you so much!!
good explanation
thank you
thanks a lot, really helpful
Very helpful
Very welll💥
The awkward silence at the end tho 😂
This guy 🙌🤣
At 9:23 the directrix is x=-d but doesn't an Ellipse have two directrix.
thank youuuuu
great video
10:45 can i just use the distance between the verticie and focus to determine c? btw how did u know e=c/a? thx
Eccentricity is defined as e=c/a so that's how he knows.
how do you know if its in left at this point 34:46
I love you 🥺
he really is the best person in the universe for these videos wish I could donate
thankssss sirr
All fun and game untill rotated comic section and polar equation enters the syllabus 💀😭
Amazinggg
I love you
Cow moo at 39:19?
👍
🧡🧡🧡
.