Bokeh Challenge Part 2 -Nocticron vs the rest
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 мар 2020
- Bokeh Challenge Part 2 -Nocticron vs the rest
The second part of my bokeh challenge. I'm comparing 6 portrait tele lenses. How does the Nocticron 42,5mm F1.2 stack up in this comparison.
👕Get something to wear and support my channel at the same time👕
teespring.com/stores/sulantob...
Music from Artlist.
Sunset Over Cadiz by Kevin Conlon
If you are interested in premium quality music for your videos, please use this affiliate link to subscribe to Artlist and get two extra months for free.
bit.ly/36TfmgX
My name is Matti Sulanto, I'm a photographer and a Lumix ambassador based in Helsinki Finland. I'll publish a new video twice a week.
Subscribe also to my monthly newsletter and get a free preset and camera profile that you can use with LR or PS (ACR). Of course you'll also get my best picks of the latest in the camera and photography world. sulanto.fi/newsletter/
My camera gear, these are affiliate links:
Lumix G9: amzn.to/2u1e85n
Lumix G90/95: amzn.to/2S8ZTmT
Lumix LX100II: amzn.to/3b1ZhrI
Lumix GH5s: amzn.to/2vIhP0b
Lumix S1R: amzn.to/394HTB7
Leica 15mm F1.7: amzn.to/392JbMD
Lumix 42.5mm F1.7: amzn.to/36K6itX
Leica Nocticron 42.5mm F1.2: amzn.to/38QmDyO
Leica 8-18mm F2.8-4: amzn.to/38V5KD9
Lumix 25mm F1.7: amzn.to/392IoLF
Leica 10-25mm F1.7: amzn.to/2S7pXPb
Leica 50-200mm F2.8-4: amzn.to/2S8NwqV
Saramonic Blink 500 wireless mic: amzn.to/31e9SLX
I make my content using Panasonic Lumix cameras and lenses. Some of the equipment I use is my own and some is on loan from Panasonic.
My Instagram: / sulantoblog
My website: sulanto.fi
Surprising how little difference there is wide open between the Lumix 42.5mm 1.7 and the Leica 42.5 1.2. Considering their usual application as portrait lenses, and the limitations of RUclips compression, the price difference of £299 compared to £1149 seems hard to justify.
The difference certainly is not that big, but that's how it is, for the last few percent of gain you pay a lot more. However, it's good to realize that the Lumix has slightly narrower angle of view, which helps a bit too.
Agreed. Happy I have the 1.7f :-)
I have the Noctricron For video the extra capture area is great as the cheaper lens captures slightly less area at the same distance especially if your camera crops in on 4k like my G85 but the 1.7 is great for street as it’s compact and light
I wonder if the Leica lenses can pull ahead when a higher resolution is used, exposing a bigger difference when using the 80MP high resolution mode?
Thanks for the comparison. One suggestion: leave the shots up for at least six seconds. RUclips allows you to use the arrow keys to skip forward/back by 5 seconds when paused which makes it easier to compare the shots.
Great fun. I got 3 right.
Thanks so much for you video blogs. I have gone through about 8 in the last few days
Thank you!
Nailed the 1.2 and the 1.7
considering the price difference the 1.7 is plenty good enough
especially if the background is a little further away
Hoping for a 12mm 1.4 review hehe...
I d like to see cheap and tiny Lumix 35-100 3.5-5.6 in this test. It's the most popular and you reviewed it in the past. Great fun!
I don't have that lens any more, I returned it, so could not have it. However, suspect it would look very similar to the Lumix G 12-60mm.
As with the previous challenge, I find the brief glimpses of each, and also the inability to zoom to 100% makes it almost impossible to really compare. It would be nice if you could upload them somewhere for more careful consideration.
Thanks for your input. The video is 4k and when I watch it on my 27 inch screen the photos are about 10x17 inch, which should be enough to see any differences. You can always pause the video and like I said this not meant to be scientific 100% pixel peep. I'll consider your proposition in the future.
Oh Man. Iove the 42,5 f1.7!! An awesome result for the price, specially with the obvious comparison with the Noct. I want mine back😢🙂
Thanks! Yes, the tiny Lumix G 42.5mm is a gem😀
I have it, but I should use it more often.
@@ookiemand yes, you should! 🙂🙂
Surprisingly little difference. It seems that smaller sensor size becomes the great equalizer. More than variation in the aperture.
I think the pictures size, the final output size, is much more of an equalizer. Very small pictures have less difference and large have more, because in large size you can see more.
Does anyone out there know how to get out of eshtr into mshtr? I´m mostly using P or A mode on my gx800.
Thanks for watching the video. What was your favorite lens? You'll find the shutter here: Camera menu > Shutter type.
@@mattisulanto I´m surprised I liked the first one most!
I knew numbers 4 and 5 :)
I use 42.5 F1.7 and i think it is a real bokeh monster!
Quality and shape of the bokeh is amazing and the lens is super small with low market velue.
Good job! The tiny Lumix G 42,5mm is one great lens.
Which lens do you recommend to have as a set/team with the 42.5? Based on filmmaking needs
@ i love 12-40 f2.8 Olympus ... But people usually go for Panasonic 12-35 f2.8 due to built in image stabilizer. These are lenses which cover basic needs if it comes to angles of view.
I recently bought the sigma 56mm 1.4 and its beautiful :)
Good for you! Go get some awesome photos on your new lens.
9/12 or 6/6 in the wide open challange. Love to see my Leica 12-60 do a great job.
Thanks for trying, and you did very well.
It’s a Ton-eh challenge! Bring it on!
I can dream of a Camera Conspiracy's collaboration, the joking Canadian and the serious Fin :) - It could be hilarious!
@@ookiemand Only one of them is a REAL PHOTOGRAPHER xD
"Loser!" ;)
No difference to me at f 5.6 - wide open the were 5 and 6 but could not tell which is which - see now there were the two leica‘s - it‘s probably me being used to leica lenses
Thanks for trying.
Hi Matti: I watched both of these comparisons and I must not be a lens snob because I think they are all good with the differences being very minor. I don't think most people would notice the difference. So, I'm not sure that the additional cost of the Nocticron is worth it -- to me anyway. I really enjoy your channel and the thought that you put into your content. Thanks!
Thanks for your kind words. That's it, they look very similar here, at least. The differences may be a big deal to some, but some could not care less. It really depends on what you are shooting.
I missed the G X vario 35-100 2.8f in your comparison; one of my favorite tele-lenses.
Unfortunately I don't have that lens, but there are two other lenses at F2.8 and they probably look pretty close the same as the 35-100mm would look.
@@mattisulanto I highly recommend 35-100 F2.8 (Mark II) as well. I expected it will be a common tele zoom lens, but it turned out to be great for portraits as it does incredible subject/background separation, when every detail on the subject is perfectly sharp.
Also i guessed right Nocticron and Lumix 42.5 F1.7. :)
@@Mir1189 I have used the 35-100mm, but I don't have it. Thanks for trying the bokeh challenge.
@@Mir1189 not only perfect for portraits but also for landscapes! really, the panasonic 35-100 is superb
@@MrJapanforce Did some photos in my home city (quite empty now). The lens has great combination of compression and high contrast. So i turned bad light (5pm) into BW set with high contrast.
I thought 3 had the leica colors, so i thought it was the nocticron. and 4 looked a bit cheap like the 25 f1.7. so i thought that was the 42.5 f1.7.
Thanks for trying.
I prefer the rendering of 2 and 5.
So little diff b/t 1.2 and 1.7 - not worth the much higher price IMHO.
You are not the only one who thinks like that. Like in everything else, you pay a lot for that last few percentage of gain.
The nocticron is expensive... But it probably is the best prime of m43 in terms of sharpness
LOL. 4 and 5 spot on. The rest...meh