@@diegofernandez597 Sure was! He didn't touch the net with any part of his body or the racket, and he hit the ball on the court on Bergs' side of the net. Perfectly valid point. 😊
The rule is that if the ball bounces on your side your racquet is allowed to cross the net to hit the ball. It is not allowed if the ball has not bounced yet.
Yes, the ball hit the ground and then popped up and spun back over the net. He had no choice but to hit it while it was in the air no matter where it was. @@diegofernandez597
This is much harder than it looks. Not only does Stef have to sprint towards the net and not run into it, but he has to turn his strings facing the ground so his racquet won't clip the net.
deemed one of the most impossible shots in tennis (yes its legit), prolly happened and caught on tape a handful of times in the history of tennis - tsisipas just did it right here. incredible.
Maybe a little late to the party but there actually is no rule that you may not make contact with the ball on the opponents side AFTER it has crossed over to your side. This is mixed up a lot because usually the only way to hit the ball on your opponents side is before it has crossed the net and you cannot do that. In a somewhat rare case like this where it has crossed the net and then bounces back you can make contact with the ball wherever, provided you don't touch the net. Hope this helps, enjoy Tennis! 🎉
It's the counter to that famous bounceback dropshot that Paire did in Paris Bercy years ago..rarely players were able to do it again but this was just great from Tsitsipas.
New training regime for all tennis players……run full speed to the net, stop on a dime, strike the ball just as it hangs in mid-air (on the opponent’s side), pirouette, hop on one foot and balance to win the point. 🎾😄
It is legal only if the ball has previously touched your side of the court. Otherwise it is not legal. And of course, you cannot touch the net it the opponent’s court.
its absolutely fair. Just like its fair to hit the ball with spin to bounce back over then in a way where 99 percent of the time the opponent would not be able to get it back. Do you also consider smashes unfair because 99 percent of the time they are unreturnable, and are aces not fair now?@@mirrama9866
@@goonigoogoo5868this is the only exception where it is legal (hence the point was given to tsitsipas), you are correct that you cannot hit the ball with your racket over the net but in this special case, since the ball had already bounced in tsitsipas side and went back to the other players, he is allowed to hit the ball even if it is over the net as it is still technically his shot.
@@goonigoogoo5868 Yes it is legal when the ball bounces on your side first, as long as you don't touch the net -- it's the reason why many players attempt to do it but usually fail b/c they either touch the net with their racket or cannot stop running and crash into the net. Giron tried to do it against Tsitsipas in Mallorca but lost his racket trying.
Hypothetically if the bounce was much higher, would Tsitsipas be allowed go walk around the net and hit it on Bergs' side of the court? Or can he just not physically stand on that side of the court? Or can he be in the doubles alley just not in Bergs' singles court space?
The rule is that you can do anything so long as you don't contact the "playing area" other than your own while the ball is still in play. Tsitsipas was allowed to touch anything that his ball would be out if it touched. So yes, Berg's doubles alley was fair game. See my detailed comment I just now posted for details.
What do you mean by regular? It's very rare that a player hits a drop shot that bounces on their opponent's side and then bounces back because of the spin on the ball in the first place. It's even more rare that the opponent successfully reaches the ball, makes contact and hits a winner. So I guess no, it's not regular. 🤣
Its legit. The reason why people arent sure is that this is incredibly rare, because its extra hard to do without touching the net with your body/racquet.
I got to hit a shot like that in a doubles match once. It was much easier because I didn’t have to run like Tsitsipas did. Our opponents threw a fit because I reached over the net to hit the ball. We eventually had to look up the rule online and show them that it’s perfectly legal to reach over the net if the ball bounces on your side and then spins backward over the net. Sadly, they were poor sports about it, probably cuz they hated being wrong.
Did you just give Stefanos a slap in the face and a compliment at the same time? 🤣I guess you achieved all of your dreams by the age of 25. Idk about you but earning $26M just in tournaments alone and winning Masters titles and reaching 2 grand slam finals and financially supporting your parents and siblings by age 25 is more than a lot of people do in their life. Chill. He's gonna win a major.
@Deerjason No, you can't do anything intentionally to interfere with your opponent's legit play. And if Berg unintentionally happened to block Tsitstipas' otherwise-makeable shot, that would be an unintentional hindrance and thus a let, causing the point to be replayed. That's never happened so far as I know, since making this Tsitsipas-style shot almost always results in touching the net, so the umpire's judgment is needed if Tsitstipas claims he "could have" made it without touching the net if his opponent were not standing in his way.
He had to touch it. You could think of it as a double bounce if he hadn’t and he would lose the point. The only time when you can reach over the net to hit the ball is if it already crosses to your side of the court and then crosses the net again to your opponent’s side before you touch it.
@kostashristop The rule is that so long as no one touches the net or otherwise ends the point in some other way, Tsitsipas loses the point if he doesn't at least "touch" the ball with his racket. Your racket must contact the ball for each shot that you win.
The rule is that you can do anything so long as you don't contact the "playing area" other than your own while the ball is still in play. Tsitsipas was allowed to touch anything that his ball would be out if it touched: all of his side of the court, all of the court around the singles lines of his opponent's court, all of the net outside the singles stick (which stands in the doubles alley three feet past the singles sideline), the net post, the umpire chair, etc. So a player could run to the net and jump over the playing area with a hand on the part of the net outside the singles stick, land on the opponent's doubles alley, and then hit the ball. If the player's racket, shoe, shirt, hand, etc. touches the playing part of the net, or the singles stick, or the opponent's court's playing area, while the ball is still in play, that's a "touch" and is loss-of-point. But if the touch happens after the ball is out of play, it's allowed. So if the ball bounces twice after the hit (or hits the opponent, or after the first bounce touches a permanent fixture, like the umpire chair in this video), the player then can touch any of the playing-area items. Tsitsipas's shot was amazing - the best I've ever seen for this rule - but theoretically could have been far more complicated and still won him the point. There have been many videos of spin-shots like Berg's bouncing very high with both players near the net. The player could theoretically have time to run around the net post, or jump over the net with a hand on the net next to the post, stand in the opponent's doubles alley, and hit the ball into the opponent's chest or back into the net, and then step into the opponent's court. In umpire classes we were shown a staged video of a player simply reaching over the net and hitting the spinning ball back into the net, where of course the opponent had no chance at it. The most amazing thing about the Tsitsipas shot was that Tsitsipas knew this rule. Based on 40 years of televised matches and thousands of RUclips videos, I'd estimate that 95% of pros don't know some of the simple rules, much less the odd ones. Tsitsipas's knowledge and action were not just the shot of the year, they were the play of the century!
It usually isn’t because you cannot hit the ball with your racket over the net except for special situations like this where the ball had already bounced in tsitsipas side but somehow spun back towards the opponent’s side, since it is technically still his shot, he was allowed to do that and hence won the point.
I am wondering what the reaction of Bergs is. Is he wondering if it is legal or was he amazed by the shot ? If he doesn't the rules, it would be very very strange for a professionnal tennisman
@calcal9551 Amazingly, most of these millionaire players don't know most of the rule oddities. We umpires discreetly laugh at many of the televised arguments between players and umpires, since the rule is so obvious to us but clearly not known to the player.
You can, as long as it has bounced on your side first AND as long as you don't touch the net before the ball bounces twice (at which point the rally is over).
@@LucaDinhNguyenyes but if you contact the ball at your side the after move can be finished in your opponent side as long it doesn’t touch the net until the ball bounce s twice
ooh ! for me he touched the ball with AND the string ... and the FRAME ( look at it in the slow motion ) and it is considered as a " double contact " ... fault ;)
bull shit. that is illegal. the racket is NOT allowed to cross over the net ! all these fake paid comments. and not one that knows this is illegal shot .
Is this shot over the net legal??? This shot cannot be accepted in any game one cannot hit a ball over the net. This is wrong in so many levels. This is not skill, it is an action that is not acceptable in tennis laws and regulations.
Learn the rules, noob🤦♂️ It is allowed to make contact over the net as long as the ball has bounced on your side before. This is common knowledge, come on.
@@elektrik_exekutioner6822 I guess you have read the rules. It seems odd to me and maybe the disrespectful behaviour of Tsitsipas in some games made me assume. Thank you for the info, much appreciated.
You surely shouldn’t be allow to hit the ball when it is on the opponents courts. What nonsense is this? It would for the Belgian man to hit it back if he could reach it. If not, point to Chispitas.
Learn to spell his name correctly amigo...It is TSITSIPAS.Not "Chispitas" or Chipita chips or whatever...When it comes to Alcaraz, I don' t say ALCATRAZ or Alcatel...He' s been here around for some years already...
@@aidalf1912I know it is allowed. I’m simply saying that in my opinion that makes no sense. I don’t see any logic in that rule. That’s my point and f view, you may or may not agree with it.
Wow. This is unbelievable skill.
The fact he didn't touch the net, not with his racket, not with his body, is absolutely unbelievable. 😮👏
Was the point valid?
@@diegofernandez597Yeah it was: it is the only shot in tennis where it is allowed to pass the racket over the net!
@@diegofernandez597 Sure was! He didn't touch the net with any part of his body or the racket, and he hit the ball on the court on Bergs' side of the net. Perfectly valid point. 😊
The rule is that if the ball bounces on your side your racquet is allowed to cross the net to hit the ball. It is not allowed if the ball has not bounced yet.
Yes, the ball hit the ground and then popped up and spun back over the net. He had no choice but to hit it while it was in the air no matter where it was. @@diegofernandez597
This is much harder than it looks. Not only does Stef have to sprint towards the net and not run into it, but he has to turn his strings facing the ground so his racquet won't clip the net.
I think he turned the strings to keep the ball in court. But i maybe wrong
no it looked hard... very hard
No sh!t Sherlock.
the next question is ... did he hit the ball ... only with the string ?? ;)
Could Bergs use his body to block the ball since it bounced over to his side? By blocking I mean step in between the net and the ball.
deemed one of the most impossible shots in tennis (yes its legit), prolly happened and caught on tape a handful of times in the history of tennis - tsisipas just did it right here. incredible.
Es ilegal, no podes pegarle sobre la red o en el lado contrario.
@@robertorobertes7630 this is one of the exceptions where it's legal.
@@robertorobertes7630 es legal
@@robertorobertes7630 You can't when it's a volley, but here you can, because the ball already bounced once.
Amaaaaaazing shot, never seen it before
Which is why it’s so amazing. Very few people have actually done it. It may not be the rally of the year but it is definitely the shot of the year.
That's a once in a lifetime shot for sure.
Raonic has done it at least twice
See the disbelief on Berg's face which says it all
@@VicenzoVn what is the rule you referencing to..?
@@VicenzoV Kind of. The racket may cross the net, but the contact between the ball and the racket needs to happen on your side.
@@flancondulceIn this case Tsitsipas made contact on his opponent's side of the net, and won the point. How do you explain that?
Maybe a little late to the party but there actually is no rule that you may not make contact with the ball on the opponents side AFTER it has crossed over to your side. This is mixed up a lot because usually the only way to hit the ball on your opponents side is before it has crossed the net and you cannot do that. In a somewhat rare case like this where it has crossed the net and then bounces back you can make contact with the ball wherever, provided you don't touch the net. Hope this helps, enjoy Tennis! 🎉
That shot was incredible!! Keep it up Stef!
Shot of the year contender there.
Nothing extraordinary here to be a contender for shot of the year. Just very rare case
lol.. just nonsense.. cry some more fanboy@@nenkoandreev9894
@@nenkoandreev9894very rare = extraordinary
@@nenkoandreev9894 lol, you need to watch more tennis
@@nenkoandreev9894it is very rare because it is difficult to do
It's the counter to that famous bounceback dropshot that Paire did in Paris Bercy years ago..rarely players were able to do it again but this was just great from Tsitsipas.
Could Bergs use his body to block the ball since it bounced over to his side?
If you’re thinking of the same one I am, the ball actually didn’t come back across the net. still an insane shot
The beauty & epicness of tennis.
Amazing control
wow what a shot!!
that is exceptional balance
this is the best shot I've seen in my LIFE lol
Daaamn this one was crazy
What a great point! 👍
Beautiful point!!! Love the variety of shots being made!!!
When I thought I've seen it all...
Stefanos Tsitsipas is everything ❤🔥🔥 Just love Stef 😍
Second time i've seen this happened. Its so wild you wouldn't think it's allowed at first.
タッチネットしなかったのが凄い！！
What a drop shot, to come back over the net!
I love Bergs' first name. I named my cat Zizou, after smuggling it from Algeria. Never thought someone would chose it as a name for his/her child.
Not "bizzare"...BRILLIANT!
But he succeeded 😮😮😮😮😮incredible Effect 😮
Well, it is legitimate as long as he's not touching the net with his body (which he tries hard to avoid, as seen).
But what if opponent would stay there, on his side - blocking Tsitsipas' shot?
@@antonvinnik426He probably wouldn't be allowed to physically block Tsitsipas from hitting the shot.
@@antonvinnik426 If Tsitsipas hadn't do that it would be a point for the opponent.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten Why not allowed if he is on his side trying to get the perfect position for the ball?
Only other one I know of is Nadal back in 2010 Indian Wells forgot against who but that is quite impressive
Great to know you can reach over the net. Now you just have to get to the net to stop ball from going over.
camera man or position is amazing. AO really shows profession
I wonder how many cameras they have because they show some amazing camera angles on replay!! 🎥😊🎾
IS IT LEGITTTT??🤣🤣this commentator is the best!!😆
Robbie Koenig is the best
New training regime for all tennis players……run full speed to the net, stop on a dime, strike the ball just as it hangs in mid-air (on the opponent’s side), pirouette, hop on one foot and balance to win the point. 🎾😄
That umpire in his hometown, making a morning coffee closes the window in his house just in case Tsipa happens to be in town
What a shot! I always thought hitting the ball on opponent side of net was not legal lol.
It is legal only if the ball has previously touched your side of the court. Otherwise it is not legal. And of course, you cannot touch the net it the opponent’s court.
@rayestaran well... legal but not fair at all because an opponent has no chance to defeat/hit that ball.
@@rayestaran Aaaah got it thanks.
its absolutely fair. Just like its fair to hit the ball with spin to bounce back over then in a way where 99 percent of the time the opponent would not be able to get it back. Do you also consider smashes unfair because 99 percent of the time they are unreturnable, and are aces not fair now?@@mirrama9866
@@mirrama9866What do you mean "not fair"? Of course it's fair.
Stafanos with that shoot proof that he's one of 5 best athletic tennis player ever 😮
Bullshit.
lmao of cours, of course.
Can't wait to see that point in the top 100 shot selection of 2024 :D
That was a perfect drop shot.
But still lost the point 😂
If Berg saw it coming, moved to it, and played the reply around both the net and the umpire's chair, he'd have won shot of the year.
But it’s in his dreams. The one that isn’t, is what Tsitsipas did. Have seen it 100 times. THE shot of the year
Zizou was a deer caught in headlights. Couldn't move.
Padel shot. Por la porta😊
What would have happened if tsitsipas hit the ball into the net from Bergs side?
He would win the point
i'm not sure@@JK-wz7uj
That's what I wanted to know. Thanks for questioning.
Whoa, I never even thought about this question! Turns out, that's allowed. Crazy.
Wow!! This is legal, isn't it?
Yes, 100%.
no it is not legal. the racket can NOT cross over4 the net to hot a ball that is still on the other side
@@goonigoogoo5868this is the only exception where it is legal (hence the point was given to tsitsipas), you are correct that you cannot hit the ball with your racket over the net but in this special case, since the ball had already bounced in tsitsipas side and went back to the other players, he is allowed to hit the ball even if it is over the net as it is still technically his shot.
@@goonigoogoo5868 Yes it is legal when the ball bounces on your side first, as long as you don't touch the net -- it's the reason why many players attempt to do it but usually fail b/c they either touch the net with their racket or cannot stop running and crash into the net. Giron tried to do it against Tsitsipas in Mallorca but lost his racket trying.
And that’s the only time you can reach over the net and hit the ball.
Padel Tennis Shot :D
shots of the year thus far, easy. Great form by Stefanos.
Ballerina !!!
Zizou looked like he saw Jesus on a spaceship. 🤣
this exact same shot happened this year at the Australian open stefanos tsitsipas vs zizou bergs
Hypothetically if the bounce was much higher, would Tsitsipas be allowed go walk around the net and hit it on Bergs' side of the court? Or can he just not physically stand on that side of the court? Or can he be in the doubles alley just not in Bergs' singles court space?
I think you can't cross the parallel of the net to hit a shot but I'm not 100 percent
Yes, you can walk around the net to hit it...has been done before
The rule is that you can do anything so long as you don't contact the "playing area" other than your own while the ball is still in play. Tsitsipas was allowed to touch anything that his ball would be out if it touched. So yes, Berg's doubles alley was fair game. See my detailed comment I just now posted for details.
@@duncanferguson7814 No. See the comment I just now posted for full details.
@@SuperG11123 I don't think that's true at all. Give examples - when, where, who
Djokovic would've fallen straight into the net LOL
Djokovic tried to play a similar shot against Hurkacz last year at Wimbledon, but did not manage to keep his balance, and ended up touching the net.
Now here is one more thing for Djokovic to accomplish. Unfortunately he will retire not making this shot.
Now here is one more thing for Djokovic to accomplish. Unfortunately he will retire not making this shot.
Now here is one more thing for Djokovic to accomplish. Unfortunately he will retire not making this shot.
Now here is one more thing for Djokovic to accomplish. Unfortunately he will retire not making this shot.
Fuji senpai at real life counter but countered.
What would have happened if tsitsipas hit the ball into the net from Bergs side? lmaooo
Is it regular to hit the ball in the opposite site??😮
in this case, yes.
What do you mean by regular? It's very rare that a player hits a drop shot that bounces on their opponent's side and then bounces back because of the spin on the ball in the first place. It's even more rare that the opponent successfully reaches the ball, makes contact and hits a winner. So I guess no, it's not regular. 🤣
Bergs’ shot wasn’t easy either, can’t cut it any closer than that!
Its legit. The reason why people arent sure is that this is incredibly rare, because its extra hard to do without touching the net with your body/racquet.
One of the most angled shots ever lol
ha ha haaaa excellent !
The ball hit the court and then spun back up and over the net. He had no choice but to hit it or lose the point.
I didn't even know that was allowed but I guess if the ball can get that much spin it should.
I got to hit a shot like that in a doubles match once. It was much easier because I didn’t have to run like Tsitsipas did. Our opponents threw a fit because I reached over the net to hit the ball. We eventually had to look up the rule online and show them that it’s perfectly legal to reach over the net if the ball bounces on your side and then spins backward over the net. Sadly, they were poor sports about it, probably cuz they hated being wrong.
gel çüçüçü😊
What an underachiever. So talented
Bergs?
It is the mental discipline he has to improve on. He has the skills no doubt, but he allows his frustrations at times, to cloud his judgement.
@@orwell9579 🤣
Did you just give Stefanos a slap in the face and a compliment at the same time? 🤣I guess you achieved all of your dreams by the age of 25. Idk about you but earning $26M just in tournaments alone and winning Masters titles and reaching 2 grand slam finals and financially supporting your parents and siblings by age 25 is more than a lot of people do in their life. Chill. He's gonna win a major.
Tampoco la pavada que es un puntazo...jajajaja puntazo es otra cosa😅😅😅😅
what's the ruling if he'd hit the ball in the opponents net instead of the ground? because it was kinda close
I think it has to hit the court first.
Legal. Just can't stick your racket over the net before the ball's left their side.
@@RebelOfDaNewThat wasn't the question.
Like I said, it's legal. Don't talk to me again@@elektrik_exekutioner6822
@@al1976-v7m Nope
Could Bergs use his body to block the ball since it bounced over to his side?
@Deerjason No, you can't do anything intentionally to interfere with your opponent's legit play. And if Berg unintentionally happened to block Tsitstipas' otherwise-makeable shot, that would be an unintentional hindrance and thus a let, causing the point to be replayed. That's never happened so far as I know, since making this Tsitsipas-style shot almost always results in touching the net, so the umpire's judgment is needed if Tsitstipas claims he "could have" made it without touching the net if his opponent were not standing in his way.
WOW!! That was an example of defying gravity!! 😳🫨🤯😱
Quick question wouldn't he have won the point without hitting it? Since the ball went back or the racket had to touch it?
He had to touch it. You could think of it as a double bounce if he hadn’t and he would lose the point. The only time when you can reach over the net to hit the ball is if it already crosses to your side of the court and then crosses the net again to your opponent’s side before you touch it.
stop to kill ears ate the end
To the uploader: you spelled ‘bizarre’ wrong
There was backspin. If Tsitsipas hadn’t touched the ball, it would still end and the opponent’s side. What would be the case then ?
Then it would a win for Tsitsipas' opponent
@kostashristop The rule is that so long as no one touches the net or otherwise ends the point in some other way, Tsitsipas loses the point if he doesn't at least "touch" the ball with his racket. Your racket must contact the ball for each shot that you win.
He could of jumped over the net, hit the ball in mid air, landed on the other side, and if the ball bounced twice before landing, still won the point.
or hit the ball into his opponent, still won the point
The rule is that you can do anything so long as you don't contact the "playing area" other than your own while the ball is still in play. Tsitsipas was allowed to touch anything that his ball would be out if it touched: all of his side of the court, all of the court around the singles lines of his opponent's court, all of the net outside the singles stick (which stands in the doubles alley three feet past the singles sideline), the net post, the umpire chair, etc. So a player could run to the net and jump over the playing area with a hand on the part of the net outside the singles stick, land on the opponent's doubles alley, and then hit the ball. If the player's racket, shoe, shirt, hand, etc. touches the playing part of the net, or the singles stick, or the opponent's court's playing area, while the ball is still in play, that's a "touch" and is loss-of-point. But if the touch happens after the ball is out of play, it's allowed. So if the ball bounces twice after the hit (or hits the opponent, or after the first bounce touches a permanent fixture, like the umpire chair in this video), the player then can touch any of the playing-area items. Tsitsipas's shot was amazing - the best I've ever seen for this rule - but theoretically could have been far more complicated and still won him the point. There have been many videos of spin-shots like Berg's bouncing very high with both players near the net. The player could theoretically have time to run around the net post, or jump over the net with a hand on the net next to the post, stand in the opponent's doubles alley, and hit the ball into the opponent's chest or back into the net, and then step into the opponent's court. In umpire classes we were shown a staged video of a player simply reaching over the net and hitting the spinning ball back into the net, where of course the opponent had no chance at it.
The most amazing thing about the Tsitsipas shot was that Tsitsipas knew this rule. Based on 40 years of televised matches and thousands of RUclips videos, I'd estimate that 95% of pros don't know some of the simple rules, much less the odd ones. Tsitsipas's knowledge and action were not just the shot of the year, they were the play of the century!
This is very unclear
Never thought that was legal
It usually isn’t because you cannot hit the ball with your racket over the net except for special situations like this where the ball had already bounced in tsitsipas side but somehow spun back towards the opponent’s side, since it is technically still his shot, he was allowed to do that and hence won the point.
I am wondering what the reaction of Bergs is. Is he wondering if it is legal or was he amazed by the shot ? If he doesn't the rules, it would be very very strange for a professionnal tennisman
He didn't know it was a legal shot.
Many players dont know the rules of such shot. Even happened to Murray against Djokovic in 2012 when the ump didnt know.
@calcal9551 Amazingly, most of these millionaire players don't know most of the rule oddities. We umpires discreetly laugh at many of the televised arguments between players and umpires, since the rule is so obvious to us but clearly not known to the player.
Does he win the point? I thought the ball has to remain over his side before he can hit the ball across the net?
not really, once ball crossed the net, it can be hit any where before second bounce.
@@jsyangyu Is it also allowed to run around the net if needed to hit a ball like that??
@@Hello2u3582mypincode good question
If he jumped over the net and hit the ball. Would that still count ?
The rule is that you can do that so long as you don't touch any part of the net's or ground's "playing area".
Isn't it overreaching?
Woww
Waaiiiiit, I thought you couldn't hit the ball on the side of the opponent?
Nah you can if it bounces on your side of the court first.
So if it’s a volley, you can’t hit the ball on the side of the opponent?
@@LucaDinhNguyen Yes exactly right, not when it's on the full.
You can, as long as it has bounced on your side first AND as long as you don't touch the net before the ball bounces twice (at which point the rally is over).
@@LucaDinhNguyenyes but if you contact the ball at your side the after move can be finished in your opponent side as long it doesn’t touch the net until the ball bounce s twice
😯
A very normal shot.
Ah, isn't padel? 🤦😬
SPONSORS JUMP SCARE
ooh ! for me he touched the ball with AND the string ... and the FRAME ( look at it in the slow motion )
and it is considered as a " double contact " ... fault ;)
Tilsitsipas is lucky he didn’t hit the umpire… weird shot 😮😅
Had the ball hit the umpire, it's a play. Nothing would happen.
The point was in play and it isn’t intentional. Nothing happens
Is the shot over the net like this allowed according to the rules?🤔
Yes.
This boy always with the drama
But Tsitsipas passed his Racket , toward the other side of the Net , therefore musted lost the point.
Wrong. You're allowed to make contact over the net when the ball has bounced on your side before. Learn the rules.
Very impressive shot and even his big a$$ didn't hit the net
bull shit. that is illegal. the racket is NOT allowed to cross over the net ! all these fake paid comments. and not one that knows this is illegal shot .
This is not legal, you cannot pass the racket to the other player’s side of the court.
If you don't know the rules of tennis that's fine but don't come on here and lie to ppl
Is this shot over the net legal??? This shot cannot be accepted in any game one cannot hit a ball over the net. This is wrong in so many levels. This is not skill, it is an action that is not acceptable in tennis laws and regulations.
Learn the rules, noob🤦♂️ It is allowed to make contact over the net as long as the ball has bounced on your side before. This is common knowledge, come on.
@@elektrik_exekutioner6822 I guess you have read the rules. It seems odd to me and maybe the disrespectful behaviour of Tsitsipas in some games made me assume. Thank you for the info, much appreciated.
How do you have a Greek name and hate on Tsitsipas?
Lucky shot
You surely shouldn’t be allow to hit the ball when it is on the opponents courts. What nonsense is this? It would for the Belgian man to hit it back if he could reach it. If not, point to Chispitas.
It's allowed if it has bounced on your side first. As long as you don't touch the net which Stef didn't.
U mad bro?
Learn to spell his name correctly amigo...It is TSITSIPAS.Not "Chispitas" or Chipita chips or whatever...When it comes to Alcaraz, I don' t say ALCATRAZ or Alcatel...He' s been here around for some years already...
@@spyz1448I’m a Nadal fan and usually refer to him as Neidal. No offense meant.
@@aidalf1912I know it is allowed. I’m simply saying that in my opinion that makes no sense. I don’t see any logic in that rule. That’s my point and f view, you may or may not agree with it.
This point must go to Stephanos aponnent .Wrong jujment chair umpire. Misha Canada
Tsitsiwho?
in volleyball thats what you called over reaching
I think it is allowed in Volleyball as well no? Or beach volleyball at least. The opponent can always go for a block.
Well, in volleyball the point would already be over because the ball touched the ground.
What a weird comparison to try to make.
Its not alowed to reach over the net🤔
In this case it is because the ball bounced on his side of the court before.
@@elektrik_exekutioner6822 okay thanks
Only in the case of a ball spinning back over the net is it allowed
è cattivo si arrabbia
camera man or position is amazing. AO really shows profession