@@prempititantipool3075 I don't know about destroy but I don't doubt it today because I believe Sinner and Alcaraz are the best tennis players that have lived, however, the materials, racquets and surfaces have changed as well, so it's like comparing a violinist to a cellist
Nadal didn't claim that shot. Big 4 could hit that kind of running forehand with the reverse follow-through every time they wanted. Pete Sampras was good at it. It's not unique to Nadal.
Same as all the greats, including RAFA DJOKO MURRAY, they all failed miserably in big finals against each others. But they all managed to get 20 slams which is insane !!!!
nadal never lossed at french finals, djoki never lossed at Aus finals ..FEdsqaush lossed 4 times at wimbledon finals on jis supposed best surface to nadal/djoki
@@erickfelipe Called facts ...when armchair tennis players have a love affair and get sold by FED marketing hard to see the facts..Fed is a the goat of selling the most running shoes and watches
Fed is for sure overated!! His career stats against nadal/djoki is a failure only winnning 33% of their matches in GS,never beat nadal once at french, 50% of feds tiltes were on B circuit 250/500, losing record H2H against both nadal/djoki over his career,, Lossed to djoki 3 times ina row at wimbledon finals on his Supposed best surface!! His grass winning percentage is lower than djoki at wimbledon!! Fed never won all the masters titles... Fed was weak mentally, weak backhand, weak in tennis smarts ..Bottom line fed was very overrated ..He did sell lots of running shoes and watches though
@@goderer2057 Everyone has one off stat and those are 1000 series ..djoki has a wining record over fed at master 1000 matches and so did Nadal..More failure by fedsqaush
Federer won what he did mainly through a level of talent in the domain of coordination. He wasn't a physical beast like Nadal, he was probably too lazy to go to the tedious lengths Djokovic has to become a a rubber-bodied freak with insane endurance... well, probably very few people could be bothered to go to those lengths. Federer didn't even have a coach during his most dominant period. That's why people will always rewatch his matches, because when you watch him you see nature expressing itself, his talent unfolding in real time. You see an example of life as artistic expression, an example of how good life can be for someone who finds their niche. It's just him in tune with the ball, in tune with his racquet. As is often repeated, he barely sweats... it's not the military drudgery that sport is for the most part. It's a guy who can do special things, as now we see with Alcaraz. Alcaraz brings the joy back to tennis after a long period of mechanical drudgery. For people who admire determination in the face of adversity, and excellent sportsmanship in general, they can rewatch Djokovic's achievements. Generally for me, I only rewatch Djokovic matches when he brings out the best in attacking players, like Wawrinka beating him at the French Open. That was spectacular, a peak moment in the sport.
Nostalgic shots from old and more recent matches! Remember them all like it's yesterday, but time flies:)
Imagine a one handed backhand that could beat Sinner or Alcaraz today, that was Swiss tennis back then, both Fed and Wawrinka
classic braindead and baseless comment from a hilariously delusional fan
Ya Stanimal backhand and Neo backhand were insane. I would also include prime Dominic thiem.
Alcaraz will destroy Federer in FO and wimbledon.
@@prempititantipool3075 I don't know about destroy but I don't doubt it today because I believe Sinner and Alcaraz are the best tennis players that have lived, however, the materials, racquets and surfaces have changed as well, so it's like comparing a violinist to a cellist
@@astrahcat1212sinner and Alcaraz the best tennis players that lived? LMAO you're clearly new to tennis
Assassin-like artistry in motion
Man I miss watching him play.
Fed is the ultimate precision shot maker..
One of the MANY reasons that Novak will NEVER, EVER be considered the GOAT. Roger and Rafa have that title on LOCK!!!
💪🏾😃❤️
Keep being delusional!
@@itiswhatitis8875nope, what he said was true. Federer is seen as the GOAT by the vast majority of people, Sinner said so himself
Have been really wanting to hit forehands like him since I started playing tennis🙏
that's why they slowing the courts, mostly in major tournaments
0:43 That was Nadal's own shot.
Grip and follow through aside, their forehands were more similar than different.
Nadal didn't claim that shot. Big 4 could hit that kind of running forehand with the reverse follow-through every time they wanted. Pete Sampras was good at it. It's not unique to Nadal.
Poetry in motion..🎉👌
If you're watching on a small screen and can't tell right away which one is Federer, just assume it's whoever isn't moaning so ridiculously 🙄🙄
Lmao true
can you imagine if somehow you get the racket on the ball and try to return it? you won't be able to hold the racket much less than returning it.
3:44 Toni Nadal appreciates the shot
@@beliebigkeit That angle was insane. Toni Nadal always respected Federer.
His mental strength let him down on some occasions he suffered some tough losses because of that
Same as all the greats, including RAFA DJOKO MURRAY, they all failed miserably in big finals against each others.
But they all managed to get 20 slams which is insane !!!!
good shots, but "destroying" is overselling what he actually did.
理想的なフォームなんだから一番早いたまが打てて当然
Genius!
Great🎉
Nice 👌
ホントは打てるおじさん…
o_o
nadal never lossed at french finals, djoki never lossed at Aus finals ..FEdsqaush lossed 4 times at wimbledon finals on jis supposed best surface to nadal/djoki
Rage bait folks, don’t rise to it. Especially not for an illiterate
@@Bsmith806 How did u get so cute?? Try and focus on the tennis players if u can?
So? He's the GOAT anyway, keep hating 🤭
@@Bsmith806haha, exactly
@@erickfelipe Called facts ...when armchair tennis players have a love affair and get sold by FED marketing hard to see the facts..Fed is a the goat of selling the most running shoes and watches
Fed is for sure overated!! His career stats against nadal/djoki is a failure only winnning 33% of their matches in GS,never beat nadal once at french, 50% of feds tiltes were on B circuit 250/500, losing record H2H against both nadal/djoki over his career,, Lossed to djoki 3 times ina row at wimbledon finals on his Supposed best surface!! His grass winning percentage is lower than djoki at wimbledon!! Fed never won all the masters titles... Fed was weak mentally, weak backhand, weak in tennis smarts ..Bottom line fed was very overrated ..He did sell lots of running shoes and watches though
Bruh chill out
Then how did he straight set peak djoko at age 34 THREE times?😂😂😂😂
@@goderer2057 Everyone has one off stat and those are 1000 series ..djoki has a wining record over fed at master 1000 matches and so did Nadal..More failure by fedsqaush
Federer won what he did mainly through a level of talent in the domain of coordination. He wasn't a physical beast like Nadal, he was probably too lazy to go to the tedious lengths Djokovic has to become a a rubber-bodied freak with insane endurance... well, probably very few people could be bothered to go to those lengths. Federer didn't even have a coach during his most dominant period. That's why people will always rewatch his matches, because when you watch him you see nature expressing itself, his talent unfolding in real time. You see an example of life as artistic expression, an example of how good life can be for someone who finds their niche. It's just him in tune with the ball, in tune with his racquet. As is often repeated, he barely sweats... it's not the military drudgery that sport is for the most part. It's a guy who can do special things, as now we see with Alcaraz. Alcaraz brings the joy back to tennis after a long period of mechanical drudgery. For people who admire determination in the face of adversity, and excellent sportsmanship in general, they can rewatch Djokovic's achievements. Generally for me, I only rewatch Djokovic matches when he brings out the best in attacking players, like Wawrinka beating him at the French Open. That was spectacular, a peak moment in the sport.
@@canski5646 thats not one off stat, thats a SIGNIFICANT STAT. A person in his mid 30’s beat your goat in straights 3 times during his second peak😂😂😂