Sony FE C 16-35mm T3.1 G Cinema Lens | Hands-on Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 56

  • @BandH
    @BandH  4 года назад +4

    What are your thoughts on the new Sony FE C 16-35mm T3.1 G lens? If you haven't seen our hands-on review of the Sony FX6, click here! bhpho.to/3feMgxB

  • @VickersDoorter
    @VickersDoorter 2 года назад +1

    I've had one of these a year now and use it with the FX6 and FX9. It's an incredibly versatile lens. I use mine mainly for corporate office and green screen shoots. The image quality and auto-focus are exemplary. You can zoom at a barely perceptible speed, which is a dream for seated interviews.

  • @videoandmemories
    @videoandmemories 3 года назад +4

    Yes! I've finally found footage of the FX6 using a servo lens. Thank you.

  • @bcnewsvideo
    @bcnewsvideo Год назад

    I just wanted to let you know, that your video convinced me to purchase this lens for my FX6. Thanks again.

  • @zacharysheamills
    @zacharysheamills 4 года назад +5

    Sony needs to remake the G OSS 28-135 to match the newer features of this new lens. I love my 28-135, but I do have several issues with it. This new 16-35 fixes 100% of my issues with it.
    Having a matching set of these zooms is my ideal 'budget' cinema set up right now -- a kit fee I can negotiate with clients who do not have the $$ to rent equipment.

    • @farwestgarohills3831
      @farwestgarohills3831 2 года назад +1

      @Zchary Mills ! G OSS 28-135 is F factor lens, and no T factor. Is not of Cine category. No light transient control. You love it for its focal length. All quality Cine lens' are of this rage to keep its price lower. Look for Canon Cine 30-300 lens costs around US$45,00; Fujinon Prime Vista Lenses each also costs around the same. Price factor keeps focal range low.

  • @galenyeo46
    @galenyeo46 2 года назад

    Nice shots. Thanks

  • @jfriskfilmphoto
    @jfriskfilmphoto 4 года назад +4

    Isn't this essentially a 16-35 f2.8 gm rehoused for better manual focus control? Or is there an optical improvement?

    • @BandH
      @BandH  4 года назад +4

      The optical quality is the same between this lens and the FE 16-35mm f/2.8G, except now you have more common cine functions on the lens such as better manual control, geared rings for follow focusing, a power zoom and the use of T-stops.

    • @WalterTheBalter
      @WalterTheBalter 3 года назад +2

      @@BandH The optical quality is superior I feel. The flares are way better on the cine lens

    • @_rhapsodist
      @_rhapsodist 3 года назад

      @@WalterTheBalter and the breathing characteristics/parfocal ability are much better too

  • @johannbauermeister3916
    @johannbauermeister3916 3 года назад

    Been waiting to see what this lens will be like for a while now! The first two questions I had weren't addressed: 1. Is it truly Parfocal (in manual mode)? And 2.What is the Breathing like- at wide and tele...

    • @BandH
      @BandH  3 года назад

      Sony states it is near parfocal or acts as if it is parfocal. It is not a true parfocal lens. Breathing is said to be well controlled from early reviews.
      Thanks! -Joey P

  • @HP3TV
    @HP3TV 3 года назад

    I bought this lens for use with a FX6 that is still on back order. I have had a chance to use it with my old Sony A7SII, and it is a fantastic cinema lens, but I will not get the full effect of its capabilities until I finally get my FX6. My five-month wait continues...

    • @HP3TV
      @HP3TV 3 года назад

      @@audiovisuals360 Yes. It is my personal preference, and the price was not an issue for me.

  • @angryrabbitproductions1690
    @angryrabbitproductions1690 4 года назад

    Can you comment on the build quality of this lens?
    1. Is this an all metal construction?
    2. Is the lens weather and dust resistant?

    • @BandH
      @BandH  4 года назад +1

      This is a robustly built lens just like Sony's other Cinema Series lenses. But SONY does not list weather this lens is weather resistant or the materials of the lens body components. >Mark

  • @raphaelmalcuit5508
    @raphaelmalcuit5508 2 года назад

    Thank you so much for this review. I was wondering, is it possible to add a mist filter into the lens or do I have necessarily to use a matte box? Plus, is it possible to add a filter into the mattbox or is it better to buy a new one? Thank you so much!

    • @BandH
      @BandH  2 года назад

      A screw-on 114mm filter may be used Raphael. >Mark

  • @devtank
    @devtank 4 года назад +2

    I want it! Get it for me!

  • @nozer88
    @nozer88 3 года назад

    Thx for the vid. May i ask what kind of videogead you’re using on that gitzo?

  • @capitalgeorge
    @capitalgeorge 3 года назад

    BH IF ITS 3 pounds ... why didn’t you use a rail system for support. Wouldn’t the weight of this lenses break the mount... please explain.

  • @matweiss2529
    @matweiss2529 3 года назад +1

    I would have loved to hear something about the minimal focus distance. On the SELP18110G for instance, its really far when you're in Full MF but ok in AF/MF, weirdly there is a difference.

  • @justdre3652
    @justdre3652 3 года назад +1

    waiting on the in stock email and both will get purchased!

  • @papajoe7
    @papajoe7 3 года назад +1

    Is there a longer zoom lens like this one that goes up to 200 300 or 400 more

    • @BandH
      @BandH  3 года назад +1

      I am afraid not. SONY does not offer any cine zoom lenses in these long focal lengths. >Mark

    • @papajoe7
      @papajoe7 3 года назад +1

      What Cinema zoom lens with the power Zoom that will work on the Blackmagic Design Studio Camera Pro 4K that goes to 15 mm to 400 mm or more that is very affordable with the thread

  • @paulhalliday7766
    @paulhalliday7766 3 года назад

    Would you recommend a lens support system for this lens with an FX6?

    • @_rhapsodist
      @_rhapsodist 3 года назад +1

      @exeterweathermodification watch he probably meant rod support

  • @NadeEgo
    @NadeEgo 9 месяцев назад

    Can I use it with Autofocus on the fx3?

    • @BandH
      @BandH  9 месяцев назад

      Yes, the auto focus will work on the Sony FX3.

  • @papajoe7
    @papajoe7 3 года назад

    What Cinema zoom lens with that power zoom on it will work on the Blackmagic Design Studio 4K Pro a cinema zoom lens that can go from 15 mm to 400 mm

    • @BandH
      @BandH  3 года назад

      This SONY lens is an E-mount and not compatible with the Blackmagic Design Studio 4K Pro which requires lenses with Micro Four Thirds (MFT) mounts. We can offer you no compatible lens with a 15mm to 400mm zoom range. Consider the:
      Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmar 100-400mm f/4-6.3 ASPH. POWER O.I.S. Lens
      B&H # PA100400G: bhpho.to/3BcFX7Z >Mark<
      Use it conjunction with this zoom lens: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Lens
      B&H # OL1220035: bhpho.to/2YinQ1Z: >Mark

  • @heartangel5868
    @heartangel5868 3 года назад +1

    I love it!!😉👍

  • @bj1676
    @bj1676 3 года назад

    Great review

  • @tbdweddingfilms
    @tbdweddingfilms 3 года назад

    Might be a dumb question but does anyone know how this lens matches with the Sony G Master line ex 24 1.4 gmaster

    • @BandH
      @BandH  3 года назад

      The Sony FE C 16-35mm T3.1 G and the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 G Master lenses are excellent in their own respects. However, the former would have a lot more to offer in terms of those shooting cinema.

  • @loudandclearmedia
    @loudandclearmedia 3 года назад +1

    I'm sorry but for a rehoused stills lens that price is bonkers. Yeah yeah, I get it, servo zoom...but dude.

  • @androcci
    @androcci 3 года назад

    what fluid head are you guys using? and what tripod? 0:26

  • @paul_slater
    @paul_slater Год назад

    Had anyone been able to mount an FX6 with this lens on a DJI RS2 or RS3

  • @visualsbysanga5523
    @visualsbysanga5523 4 года назад +3

    This should have been
    24-105!!!!

    • @GuillaumeB7
      @GuillaumeB7 3 года назад

      A 24-105mm at T3.1 (equivalent to F2.8) would be way too big.

  • @jserenity
    @jserenity 3 года назад

    What nd filter can I use with this?

    • @BandH
      @BandH  3 года назад

      Schneider Compact ND Kit for 114mm-Diameter Lenses
      B&H # SCCNDK
      bhpho.to/3rUWHeJ
      Contains 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 Solid ND Filters
      Reduce Exposure by 2, 3, or 4 Stops
      Greater Control Over Exposure Settings
      Rugged Black Brass Filter Rings
      High Quality Schott Glass
      4.5" Drop-In Filter Holder
      For Lenses without Front Threads
      Compact Alternative to Matte Box
      >Mark

    • @jserenity
      @jserenity 3 года назад

      Thanks but I will probably use this instead
      Kase Clip-in 4 Filter Kit UV ND8 ND64 ND1000 3 6 10 Stop Dedicated for Sony Alpha Camera

  • @muhammadhadichannel3030
    @muhammadhadichannel3030 3 года назад

    6:02 rekaman sewaktu berjalan tidak stabil... Agak goyang2...😭

  • @sa.t.2507
    @sa.t.2507 3 года назад +2

    Too bulky for the range slow aperture

    • @sa.t.2507
      @sa.t.2507 3 года назад

      @@makosports yeah and bulky considering the range

  • @petero1068
    @petero1068 3 года назад

    Nice, but overpriced. Nothing you really couldn’t get from a sigma zoom. Also, looked really cold, but that could just as well be the fx6.

  • @joeyoliver579
    @joeyoliver579 4 года назад +3

    LOL Why are you wearing a mask and she isn't??? Ridiculousness

    • @ramimxss
      @ramimxss 4 года назад +8

      what's ridiculous about wearing or not wearing a mask? if you wanna wear one, then wear one... if you don't wanna wear one then don't... and people are tired of these mask vs no mask arguments...

    • @nikolasgogstad3142
      @nikolasgogstad3142 3 года назад

      If she sneeses, do you think he will breath more or less of it with or without a mask? And what do you think will make you the most sick, heavy or light exposure?

    • @loudandclearmedia
      @loudandclearmedia 3 года назад

      It's kind of like not having to wear a rubber when she's on the pill, dig?