James does a great job here. I still find it hard to believe that the voice and the face are the same guy, though, it’s like Tiff in Tintin’s body! The voice of the future, probably.
If EVs reduced their weight to that of a comparable internal combustion car, maybe. There will still be a visceral engagement that only small controlled explosions and a multi-speed transmission can provide.
2.7 is incredibly conservative. Motor Week just clocked the normal Turbo at 2.5, so you know the Turbo S is considerably quicker. Car and Driver clocked the Turbo S at 0-60 at 2.2. Named 2nd quickest car of the last decade.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 Why do you keep parroting this notion that a 911 is not a sports car? I called you out on another channel and you went silent. Here's a link to Porsche's 911 Turbo S where it describes the Turbo S as a sports car: www.porsche.com/australia/models/911/911-turbo-models/911-turbo-s/
@@Alby911 I went silent because I was intentionally ignoring you. Read this article from Road & Track, written by a respected race car driver and learn what a sports car really is once and for all: www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a28225/sports-car-definition/
@@bigmacdaddy1234 LOL - So Porsche doesn't know how to describe their pride and joy. The 911 has been synonymous with the 'sports car' moniker for well over 50 years. It's basically common knowledge by now and anyone who says otherwise is just looking for a pointless argument.
@@Alby911 Their top of the line 911 is called the GT3 which means "Grand Tour". So yes, Porsche does know how to describe their pride and joy and now you know it too.
Despite the 992 Turbo S literally having 90% of every auto journalist that’s dared to really put it though it’s paces, have sung to the auto gods for just how bloody amazing it is. Let’s be frank here. While it may be a statement that’s difficult to digest, automotive enthusiasts are more likely struggling with how this review from CAR is relevant in 2021 when it’s simply a verbatim repeat of what was covered early last spring. I guess there’s no way you’re going to offend people this way though.
Idk. 200k for the ultimate sports car...but GT3 model has become the “hot item” and its a tad bit cheaper, just louder and not as comfortable. But if you could have just one car...
Is it relevant? Only if you want the road going equivalent of a Lear jet. Hell yes it's relevant. It's a street beast. An apex predator that can humble Ferraris etc. all while remaining stealthy and usable.
Interesting to look back at the way people thought things were going to be just 3 years ago. Now no one wants the Taycan, Porsche has to market them like crazy and deprecate like crazy. 911 values are rock solid with many older models no longer depreciating at all.
Of course it has to be a great review. Who ever said a 911 Turbo S is not worth the money or worse than a prior model or their own Taycan Turbo S? Given this is their flagship 911 model they will do everything they can to keep it above all other "street oriented" versions and the Taycan. I think the 911 will have a hybrid version in next refresh (given 8 speed PDK), just like the Cayenne. Utility cars, like the Macan and Cayenne are coming out with only electric models, but drivers of 911s won't settle for an only electric sonic note, yet. I own a 991S and a 2021 Cayenne Coupe e-hybrid and love both cars for different reasons. Porsche has to move in this direction , unless their R&D on a new fuel that is carbon neutral works out.
I think I still prefer the 991 Turbo S, but I'm growing to love this one. Honestly every 911 is amazing, especially the Turbo S versions, I'd love to have any of them.
Of course it's still relevant. People will always strive for the best, that's just how we're wired. And people who have the resources will want to keep buying great engineering...
A 4 seater sports car???? The back is only for little people with no legs but that said it is really a whow car. Despite all that electric shit (incl the Taycan) you can really drive this for hours and hours because it has no battery to be charged!!!!! Taking gas is just a few minutes....
Money no object, sure I'd buy despite the identity issue. Still one of the quickest autos for sale at any price. Unfortunately money is an object so the Carrera will have to do.
I had the 930 turbo on my wall as a boy . Growing up as a petrolhead I had several 911’s building up to a gen2 997 turbo for a few years about 6 years ago . My car had PCCB option and I added a Sharkwerks tune and exhaust. It was a very good very fast car but after waiting over 30 years to own one what it didn’t do was “ engage “ as a drivers car ( I took it to the track once again was very fast but nor engaging ) I think I understand Porsche really build it as a super GT and as that it’s untouchable. I’ll stick to the GT cars . I really want a GT4 or a 718 spyder ( I had the former boxster spyder before the turbo - great drivers car )
More relevance than a 911? Let‘s face it, the 911 is ne most relevant sportscar ever made. Inam not a Porsche Fan Boy but in every comparison it is somehow mentioned.
when where can you use any of the potential of this verdin of the 911 Turbo? in practice 300BHP and a 911 from 10 or 15 years ago is exactly the same or better. New cars like these miss the point. enjoyment is NOT top speed or 0-60 it’s the sound it’s the ride it’s the looks it’s the package. Why spend £180k instead of £30k.
Enough of the CO2-free EV bullshit. Making the batteries alone do more harm to the environment than any petrol-powered supercar will over its life cycle
i dont like to say this but i rather take a taycan..so many says it drives better then 911 and with instant respons.. i understand if you buy a ferrari/lambo for the sound and exterior.. or a manual gt3..but yeah.. bring the electric 911..
Owning a 911 Turbo S, and driving a Taycan quite often, the 9/11 rules the day every single drive. Not to mention the 9/11 has a whole lot more range and gets a nice 30 miles per gallon on the highway with the cruise control on.
Dude you don't even have enough driving skills to handle a 3 cylinder Mini Cooper much less a 911. A Taycan with 'instant response' will do you no good driving on the highway with a 65mph limit. Get real.
Both cars have different purposes. If you're serious about tracking the choice is obvious; the Taycan wins if you need more practicality and space for your family.
To be romantic: it's one of the finest driving experiences you can have, driving on the track or to the supermarket. To be sarcastic: it's aimed at an Undiscovered Market: All those grandmothers in their 70s, with an extra quarter of a million dollars to spend, who secretly wish they could qualify for Le Mans.
Not with a PDK! In Sports Cars you must have a Manual to row through gears when you need or want. You can drop the clutch and lay a patch. Not with a PDK that give a little chirp, light smoke. I'm in the U.S. and drive only Manuals for Control as I drive than ride with PDK.
Not to 60 in 2.7???? My stock, entry level, C8 Corvette does it in 2.8. Imagine what the new Z06 will do....and I've got ten of thousands of dollars left in my pocket!!! And my car doesn't look like the last 29 years of Corvettes. It has a brand new design. And the Corvette interior kills the Porsche boring interior.
911 992 Τurbo S performance: 1/4 mile in 10.1 seconds...... VS Tesla Model S Plaid: Cheaper, larger, more practical, more comfortable. Performance: 1/4 mile in 9.2 seconds. Much faster! So no, petrol engines are not relevant.
Like it or not petrol engines wont be going anywhere anytime soon, however much they tell you they will be, so they will be relevant for many years to come. Incidentally, the tesla looks cheap inside and out and will not handle anywhere near as good as the Porsche.
Let's see how that Tesla handles The Nurburgring against the 911 Turbo S. Both cars are not even remotely comparable; why is a family car being compared to a bona fide sports car?
Lame car. Great review. The 911 should be mid engined. The Turbo should use the 4.0 from the 718 GTS. The base 911 should use the same engine without the turbos. I wish they would retire the S monikers as well. There should be a 911 and a 911 Turbo. Keep it simple and respect the name.
But it's still boring - what's the point of spending half a million dollars to drive a car that is no more involvement than a Camry. Yes you can make a Camry just as fast as a 911 turbo - for a lot less money. What is the missing ingrediant - NO MANUAL GEARBOX. The 911 Turbo is for balding overweight men in their 50's who will rarly go above 100 kph (you can't in the commute to the office anyway - traffic jams et al) but having it is like having an 18 year old girlfriend with big knockers. It's about an ILLUSION.
Apparently you can’t afford one. No big deal but what a lame post. If you don’t mind I’m going to copy it and show other people. It made me laugh pretty good. Thanks man.
@@BrettL250 Look at my photo, my toys are a little more expensive than hair dressers sports car. But you are right, after buying my aircraft I couldn't afford a turbo, so I ordered a 911 GTS MANUAL instead.
What's your favourite 911? Let us know...
A singer 964 in powder blue with a toffee interior?
992 Turbo S...they've nailed it! 👍🏻
My current car, a 997 Turbo S.
If I had the money would buy the 992...
Mine.
RS 1973
It outruns a Lambo SVJ, a Ferrari Superfast and a McLaren 720. Yes, it's still relevant.
That number plate is almost as iconic as the car its self. I first saw it on a 993 Turbo vs Ferrari 355 article.
Can i ask a stupid question? What does “Hul” stand for?
@@thomaselli01 Its the number plate Porsche use on their UK press cars. They have been using it on the 911 Turbo for well over a decade.
I'm sure I can remember it on 911s in Fast Lane magazine in the early/mid 1980s!
The real question is whether CAR Magazine is still relevant.🤣
No true enthusiast magazine would pose such a click bait nonsensical question.
well said
Nailed it
James does a great job here. I still find it hard to believe that the voice and the face are the same guy, though, it’s like Tiff in Tintin’s body! The voice of the future, probably.
Thanks Michael!
🤣
If EVs reduced their weight to that of a comparable internal combustion car, maybe. There will still be a visceral engagement that only small controlled explosions and a multi-speed transmission can provide.
2.7 is incredibly conservative.
Motor Week just clocked the normal Turbo at 2.5, so you know the Turbo S is considerably quicker.
Car and Driver clocked the Turbo S at 0-60 at 2.2.
Named 2nd quickest car of the last decade.
The Turbo S aka the Carwow drag race god. lol
I prefer tho 911 but 765lt will probably beat it
@@nte2336 yea
Porsche means 911 simply, and this is by far the best sports car money can buy ..
Except that it's a GT car and not a sports car. The Boxster is their sports car.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 Why do you keep parroting this notion that a 911 is not a sports car? I called you out on another channel and you went silent. Here's a link to Porsche's 911 Turbo S where it describes the Turbo S as a sports car: www.porsche.com/australia/models/911/911-turbo-models/911-turbo-s/
@@Alby911 I went silent because I was intentionally ignoring you. Read this article from Road & Track, written by a respected race car driver and learn what a sports car really is once and for all: www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a28225/sports-car-definition/
@@bigmacdaddy1234 LOL - So Porsche doesn't know how to describe their pride and joy. The 911 has been synonymous with the 'sports car' moniker for well over 50 years. It's basically common knowledge by now and anyone who says otherwise is just looking for a pointless argument.
@@Alby911 Their top of the line 911 is called the GT3 which means "Grand Tour". So yes, Porsche does know how to describe their pride and joy and now you know it too.
Despite the 992 Turbo S literally having 90% of every auto journalist that’s dared to really put it though it’s paces, have sung to the auto gods for just how bloody amazing it is.
Let’s be frank here. While it may be a statement that’s difficult to digest, automotive enthusiasts are more likely struggling with how this review from CAR is relevant in 2021 when it’s simply a verbatim repeat of what was covered early last spring.
I guess there’s no way you’re going to offend people this way though.
The only car that SMOKES super cars from the start
Idk. 200k for the ultimate sports car...but GT3 model has become the “hot item” and its a tad bit cheaper, just louder and not as comfortable. But if you could have just one car...
the MSRP for Gt3 is less, but must pay more and the used market is certainly more
Is it relevant?
Only if you want the road going equivalent of a Lear jet.
Hell yes it's relevant. It's a street beast. An apex predator that can humble Ferraris etc. all while remaining stealthy and usable.
Porsche is making some of the best cars on the road! Really AMAZING!
Rick
Interesting to look back at the way people thought things were going to be just 3 years ago. Now no one wants the Taycan, Porsche has to market them like crazy and deprecate like crazy. 911 values are rock solid with many older models no longer depreciating at all.
as a 5'10 teenager, those back seats are semi functional at best. 20 minuets in the back of a 911 has you needing a Chiro..
Of course it has to be a great review. Who ever said a 911 Turbo S is not worth the money or worse than a prior model or their own Taycan Turbo S? Given this is their flagship 911 model they will do everything they can to keep it above all other "street oriented" versions and the Taycan. I think the 911 will have a hybrid version in next refresh (given 8 speed PDK), just like the Cayenne. Utility cars, like the Macan and Cayenne are coming out with only electric models, but drivers of 911s won't settle for an only electric sonic note, yet. I own a 991S and a 2021 Cayenne Coupe e-hybrid and love both cars for different reasons. Porsche has to move in this direction , unless their R&D on a new fuel that is carbon neutral works out.
I think I still prefer the 991 Turbo S, but I'm growing to love this one. Honestly every 911 is amazing, especially the Turbo S versions, I'd love to have any of them.
Of course it's still relevant. People will always strive for the best, that's just how we're wired. And people who have the resources will want to keep buying great engineering...
A 4 seater sports car???? The back is only for little people with no legs but that said it is really a whow car. Despite all that electric shit (incl the Taycan) you can really drive this for hours and hours because it has no battery to be charged!!!!! Taking gas is just a few minutes....
The 911 hasn't been relevant since Porsche cancelled and replaced it in 1977 with the vastly superior 50/50 front V8 mid-engine 928.
THAT was THE VERY BEST presentation I’ve heard on this car...... well spoken, excellent...... cheers.
Thanks Cornelius!
Money no object, sure I'd buy despite the identity issue. Still one of the quickest autos for sale at any price. Unfortunately money is an object so the Carrera will have to do.
This the car I want the most... but as exchange rate in my country is so horrible, the Turbo would make more sense... great review! Thanks a lot!!!
I had the 930 turbo on my wall as a boy .
Growing up as a petrolhead I had several 911’s building up to a gen2 997 turbo for a few years about 6 years ago .
My car had PCCB option and I added a Sharkwerks tune and exhaust.
It was a very good very fast car but after waiting over 30 years to own one what it didn’t do was “ engage “ as a drivers car ( I took it to the track once again was very fast but nor engaging )
I think I understand Porsche really build it as a super GT and as that it’s untouchable.
I’ll stick to the GT cars .
I really want a GT4 or a 718 spyder ( I had the former boxster spyder before the turbo - great drivers car )
Probably the best car money can buy.
If you want a better low speed ride don’t spec that lowered suspension. 911’s handle just fine without it.
Great and we need and wish videos in Real Best 4K 60fps HDR resolution clarity quality soon please and Sound in full HD 3D Stereo Surround.
Yes. Next question. :)
This porsche is stunning. Yes its relevant as my favorite porsche 911 is the 2021 911 turbo S. Wonderful review. Thank you
Just waiting on my Safemoon to hit $0.10 & Im getting one of these bad boys!
#safemoon
#safemoonarmy
💎👐🏽
🚀🚀🚀
Fantastic review..so good, I watched it twice! 👍🏻😎
I was expecting to see an old dude with that voice you got a radio voice. Great video!
Thanks Costas!
Many have run 2.2 seconds in the 0 to 60 mph sprint .
4 useable seats. Funny. Love the car anyway
More relevance than a 911? Let‘s face it, the 911 is ne most relevant sportscar ever made. Inam not a Porsche Fan Boy but in every comparison it is somehow mentioned.
LOVE the Testers "cardigan" nice ,,,,,, lol lol so cool and his brown shoes ,, he has style
Where’s the cardigan?!
Relevant? Are you joking?
If the Porsche isn't relevant, neither is this video.
Tiff is that you!? Great review James!
Thanks Jonathan!
A great review of a somewhat great car, thank you.
Thanks David!
I juat found out that this runs 9s with a tune. Jesus....
You mean 2.2 seconds ..quarter in 10.1 seconds..just saying
Any of you out there with 911 Turbos you need to unload because they are so sad and pathetic now, I may be able to help.
It’s both a beaut and a brute
Lol @ video title
3 adverts within the first 4 minutes - all the same. Seriously killing the experience stone dead for me
Evs are appliances on wheels, not real cars imo.
EV mechanics should be called electricians and EV drivers as operators.
Yes, very much so.
Great car but I'm let down by the rear styling and sound. The 991 sounds the best for me.
German legendary car
talk about "trade description Act"
re turbo
😂😂
Your sound levels are messed up.
I 'd like to see this put up against 570s in a head to head, it would be interesting...
It will beat it if it can beat a 720s in a drag race
@@unknownhaha2644 I am sure, I am interested in the emotive connection of the way the two cars drive... the 570s is almost analogue next to this ...
It is a car. Why do young folks call them "things"?
Guilt free C02? Producing the batteries for an electric car creates as much C02 as an average car does in eight years of driving. The truth sucks
Probably a bit too much for the B660.
when where can you use any of the potential of this verdin of the 911 Turbo? in practice 300BHP and a 911 from 10 or 15 years ago is exactly the same or better.
New cars like these miss the point. enjoyment is NOT top speed or 0-60 it’s the sound it’s the ride it’s the looks it’s the package.
Why spend £180k instead of £30k.
Yes. It’s a cult car. Especially the Porsche press VRN. Reg plate
Here is the thing, no one that can afford this car cares a bit what the 18 year old kid here thinks about anything.
"3.8" Liter.
Porsche 911 Turbo S, McLaren 720s, and the New Tesla Roadster is the best car lineup. They can all do everything and look great while doing it lo l
Clickbait title much?
Is the CARWOW best of the best still relevant? Did you really ask that 🥲
God owns the same car.
Enough of the CO2-free EV bullshit. Making the batteries alone do more harm to the environment than any petrol-powered supercar will over its life cycle
Porsche has invested billions into synthetic fuels. The only byproduct will be water. ICE cars aren’t going anywhere, thankfully.
Nominee for worst title of the year award. Seriously? Car Magazine. Is it still relevant?
Is it still relevant? Are you kidding me, and the rest of the world?
Are fish wet..?!
Sounds terrible like a vacuum cleaner disappointing
i dont like to say this but i rather take a taycan..so many says it drives better then 911 and with instant respons.. i understand if you buy a ferrari/lambo for the sound and exterior.. or a manual gt3..but yeah.. bring the electric 911..
Owning a 911 Turbo S, and driving a Taycan quite often, the 9/11 rules the day every single drive. Not to mention the 9/11 has a whole lot more range and gets a nice 30 miles per gallon on the highway with the cruise control on.
Dude you don't even have enough driving skills to handle a 3 cylinder Mini Cooper much less a 911. A Taycan with 'instant response' will do you no good driving on the highway with a 65mph limit. Get real.
Both cars have different purposes. If you're serious about tracking the choice is obvious; the Taycan wins if you need more practicality and space for your family.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 Well in Texas we have 85 mph speed limits and my 911 More than double that, yes on the highway.
Too big, too fast, too expensive. But apart from that.....
To be romantic: it's one of the finest driving experiences you can have, driving on the track or to the supermarket.
To be sarcastic: it's aimed at an Undiscovered Market: All those grandmothers in their 70s, with an extra quarter of a million dollars to spend, who secretly wish they could qualify for Le Mans.
Not with a PDK! In Sports Cars you must have a Manual to row through gears when you need or want. You can drop the clutch and lay a patch. Not with a PDK that give a little chirp, light smoke. I'm in the U.S. and drive only Manuals for Control as I drive than ride with PDK.
Drool...
😍😍
For that price I think I'd rather just get a supercar that looks like one. Rather than a supercar that looks like a sports car.
It beats pretty much every supercar tho
I think it should be considered a super car
This is what we called a sleeper
Not to 60 in 2.7???? My stock, entry level, C8 Corvette does it in 2.8. Imagine what the new Z06 will do....and I've got ten of thousands of dollars left in my pocket!!! And my car doesn't look like the last 29 years of Corvettes. It has a brand new design. And the Corvette interior kills the Porsche boring interior.
You lost us when you brought the interior into it… 🤔🤔
It can actually did 0-100 in 2.5 sec with Carwow. Car and Driver did it in 2.2 sec
Your Corvette doesn’t go 0 to 60 in2.8sec. I don’t believe you.
911 992 Τurbo S performance: 1/4 mile in 10.1 seconds...... VS Tesla Model S Plaid: Cheaper, larger, more practical, more comfortable. Performance: 1/4 mile in 9.2 seconds. Much faster! So no, petrol engines are not relevant.
Like it or not petrol engines wont be going anywhere anytime soon, however much they tell you they will be, so they will be relevant for many years to come.
Incidentally, the tesla looks cheap inside and out and will not handle anywhere near as good as the Porsche.
Not everything’s a spec sheet
Let's see how that Tesla handles The Nurburgring against the 911 Turbo S. Both cars are not even remotely comparable; why is a family car being compared to a bona fide sports car?
it does not exist yet.
Is it still relevant? Wash your mouth out with soap!
Lame car. Great review. The 911 should be mid engined. The Turbo should use the 4.0 from the 718 GTS. The base 911 should use the same engine without the turbos. I wish they would retire the S monikers as well. There should be a 911 and a 911 Turbo. Keep it simple and respect the name.
How can a boy so young give anyone advice ??
Last time I looked , this is a car REVIEW, and not advise to any individual... 🙄
Irrelevant
Sorry but I refuse to listen to supercar advice from someone who looks barely 23 years old.
Who let the 12 year old drive a turbo s?
We also let him drive a GT3 - take a look!
ruclips.net/video/kaJVPSsn6Ys/видео.html
But it's still boring - what's the point of spending half a million dollars to drive a car that is no more involvement than a Camry. Yes you can make a Camry just as fast as a 911 turbo - for a lot less money. What is the missing ingrediant - NO MANUAL GEARBOX. The 911 Turbo is for balding overweight men in their 50's who will rarly go above 100 kph (you can't in the commute to the office anyway - traffic jams et al) but having it is like having an 18 year old girlfriend with big knockers. It's about an ILLUSION.
Apparently you can’t afford one. No big deal but what a lame post. If you don’t mind I’m going to copy it and show other people. It made me laugh pretty good. Thanks man.
@@BrettL250 Look at my photo, my toys are a little more expensive than hair dressers sports car. But you are right, after buying my aircraft I couldn't afford a turbo, so I ordered a 911 GTS MANUAL instead.
@@Ozgrade3 I don’t believe you. Not even a little bit. Lol 😂
@@BrettL250 DILIGAF.
@@Ozgrade3 probably not however people with money don’t tell other people that they have it on RUclips.😂