Guyton and Hall Medical Physiology (Chapter 5) REVIEW Action Potentials || Study This!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 июл 2024
- WEBSITE: Complete video archive on - www.studythis.info
Check out the website for all that studythis has to offer including exclusive content (MCQ mock exams, transcripts, audio files, study schedules).
*The website is .info NOT .com
Review of the fifth chapter (Ch. 5) of Guyton and Hall's Medical physiology Textbook which covers Action Potentials; Titled "Membrane potential and action potentials"
Affiliate Link:*
📚 Textbook Hard copy: amzn.to/2xSmq1i
📖 Textbook E-Book: amzn.to/3fyaliK
NEW EDITION (14th ed)
📚 Textbook Hard copy: amzn.to/2J5EeLy
*Disclaimer: These links are connected to the Amazon products where I personally bought these textbooks. I have not influenced the price of the products, and I am merely providing a quick link for convenience. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Although this is a way to support the channel, you do not have to use the link if you so wish. I only promote the products which I personally believe will provide value to you.
You did a great job, congratulations from a Prof. of Medical Physiology. It's a pity you stopped, I hope you continue sooner or later, you helped very many students. I'm offering Medical Physiology lessons for free out of conviction, as my time permits.
Thanks so much for your videos! I wish I saw these back when I first read the book because it took me SO long to get through the chapters. It definitely helps to listen to your explanation before going back to the material and see which parts I didn't understand as much :)
Thank you for the kind words Kathleen! Good luck with your studies
Thanks for watching! Hope you enjoy the video, feel free to follow along or just listen in. Happy studying
New website with complete video archive and exclusive content: www.studythis.info
Thank you very much, Its really helpful for me
Thanks a lot for your help.
Thank you!
thanks keep on adding all the chPTERS
Thanks Hassam, a new chapter is currently being released every Tuesday, Thursday and occasional Saturday
can you make a definition of Action potential based on this book ? It will help a lot cause direct definition is not provided in this book
Sooo helpful..after listening these video and then reading this huge book becomes much easier...thanks alot❤💫
Thanks for the support Taj!
definetly motivates me to complete physiology , thankz
You can do it!
Can you do such a review for Robbins and cotran also?
Sir can u pls explain what is regenerative depolarization
great overview, thank you
Thanks Oyindamola! Appreciate the feedback
PLEASE TRY TO TOUCH EACH AND EVERY TOPIC
Hello,the nernst equation for potassium is - 94 mV,but at the next page written that " for potassium nernst potential is - 61 mV."Which of these is correct ?
PS:those pages are first and second pages of membran potentials and action potentials.
Keep it up bro
Upload complete physio by this way one thing I wanna say that use paper to show diagram for concepts
Thanks Muhammad!
Thank you so much.
Thanks John! Good luck with the studies
What is the difference between hypopolarzation
And hypopolarization
What do you think about the textbook by costanzo as compared guyton's?
Similar, you would only need one or the other to get the basics
Legend
I hope you know that a damn lot of nurse anesthesia students use your stuff!
I love it!
Blood physio achy sy timely up load kr do and also CVS
Which edition is this
13th
Anatomy
In the 14th edition Guyton and Hall have changed the resting membrane potential for nerve cells to -70mV. How does that work? Was the -90mV not correct?
also thank you for the explanation, it's really hard stuff to get through, but your explanation makes it much easier.
Good question, I’m not sure if it was “incorrect” or whether it was just trying to be simplified. But you are correct, in general most nerve cells resting potential is -70 (it does change in some cells but for simplicity’s sake think -70 for nerves). Cardiac resting potential on the other hand is -90
@@StudyThis Thank you for answering. Maybe I phrased my question a bit oddly, but I was just wondering out loud. Thought maybe science had new evidence about this change, or something along these lines. Either way, thank you for taking the time to reply to this