Poker Hands - Daniel Negreanu Calls Down With NO PAIR In The $1,000,000 Big One For One Drop!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 ноя 2016
- Daniel Negreanu is a man of many accomplishments. He has won 7 WSOP (World Series of Poker) bracelets, over $32 million dollars in live tournament earnings, has appeared on High Stakes Poker and Poker After Dark, and is a regular at events like the EPT (European Poker Tour), WPT (World Poker Tour), and the PCA (Pokerstars Carribean Adventure).
However, he has never won the million dollar buy in Big One For One Drop event. He makes a run at in this video, taking on Dan Colman heads up for the title. This event had just a few dozen entrants, but it was an incredibly tough field, with the likes of Phil Ivey, Antonio Esfandiari, and Phil Hellmuth (but not Tom Dwan) vying for the bracelet.
In this hand, Daniel Colman makes a full house by the river, but DNegs simply doesn't believe him. He's prepared to make a hero call with just an unpaired King. It's a gutsy play, but is it the right one? As always, Doug Polk breaks down each street of action. Poker Hands is the show where Doug analyzes live poker hands from tv poker shows.
Check out my new (non-poker) RUclips channel: / @dougpolkcrypto
FOLLOW DOUG:
Snapchat ► / wcgrider
Twitter ► / dougpolkpoker
Instagram ► / dougpolkpoker
Facebook ► / dougpolkpoker
Twitch ► / dougpolkpoker
#GrindNation
I think Daniel is loosey goosey here, he probably has a sandwich next to the table.
His phone was on table
@@jimharley6660 If it was on his crotch he would have open folded the river.
Negreanu: Lalalalala 18 million lalala I don’t think you have good cards... hmmmmmm. Call!
Colman: Full house
Negreanu: more rake is better
Hahaha so glad I came back to watch this again and saw this comment 🍻
Doug you should rename this series Douger Hands
Polker hands doe🤭
@@untamedember8527 douger hands tho
Hi Doug, I replied on your last video too but I don't think you saw it. My suggestion on that video was that you should call this series "Polker Hands" instead of "Poker Hands". I'm suggesting the same thing on this video. I think it would be a funny use of wordplay that could make this series more popular. It would be funny because your surname is "Polk" and stuff. Hope you see this!! Love your videos!!
Sorry about that. I really don't see an idea like this catching on. This is the first I've heard of it.
Doug Poke Polker
ROFLOL!
People have been questioning about this in the comments section for ages. How wasn't it the obvious choice to you? Lol
+Dim V I think you missed "something" nvm lol
Have you ever considered changing your last name to Poker, that way the name of the show would make sense.
It does make sense. It's called a play on words
polker hands seems like a good name for this
That pic of Ivey on the back wall is epic lmao
There's not a bet he can make that Negreanu will call.
norm and lon they love the drama
You should call this poker hands
mitsando no comment
Doug you should name this series polker hands ! I think it's a great pun and it's a must ! ;)
I enjoy your videos Doug. Thanks for helping me improve my game.
Lol I asked for this analyse. Thanks Doug, great vid!
The thing I liked about how Daniel played the hand is when he said "i though I was good" as opposed to "stupid me". You need to carefully make decisions and accept the fact that you could be wrong.
That said it's really good video Doug!)
Hey doug, have you ever thought of calling this series... oh screw it, nice video :)
Wow Doug is so much better and more comfortable now a days compared to when he first started these videos
I love the pictures of Phil & Viktor!
some great suggestions!!!! what a goldmine of ideas, since your so receptive mine would be poker with DP!!
Loved your first video on your new channel, subbed 4 sure:)
Great great show! Learning a ton! Thank you Doug!
Another sneak peak into polker hands! You're the best Doug! when is the "Polker" hands series going to start officially?
Another job well done, young Douglas.
hey doug, what do you think about not spoiling the end of the hand in the title?
yes that would be great !
By telling the end hes getting more views for his title ans also he spoiled the end so you wont skip foward to know it but instead you watch the whole video to know his thinking process
@@transeeyou885 he could have named it "Daniel makes a ridiculous mistake and looses tons of chips" that would have still got clicks
Anyone know how many chips they start with in the 1Drop amd what the blind levels?
Hey Doug, have you ever thought of calling this Polker Hands? I think it would be a great play on words with your name !
Alex G i always thought it was. There is Polker News though.
Doug, when you're done with the WSOP hands I was wondering if you'd do some of the hands from the Dwan vs Hellmuth NBC Heads Up tourny (the rematch). Dwan's turn bet in the K9 vs 95 hand that he busted on seemed very weird, as well as the A8 vs A8 hand where Dwan donked the flop and Hellmuth raised on JQxr. It was just a weird match in general.
Nice work doog. imo you should do a polker hands video on the casino royale hand straight flush boat over boat coolerino. lots of GTO action going on in that hand
How about a channel named Doug Polk Gardening? For talking about removing fallen leaves from the ground and such, I mean.
Looking forward to your daily Binks Vlogs
Mind Blowing
Hi Doug.. I think that Negreanu maybe believe that when Colman bets the river big his range is more polarized that when he bets small.. I think that if Colman bets around 1/2 or 1/3 Negreanu will be most likely to fold..
What a read!
you should call this spooky hands
Doug you should call these Poke Her Hands! Or Polker hands that sounds good too..
Daniel's master class includes a brief intro on tilt and a 85% off coupon
Doug, you mentioned a couple of times that being heads up oop you should check all your hands to the preflop raiser. Do you never ever ever donkbet?
He mentions in his lab that you can build a Donk range if you already have a very competent check-raise range but for less advanced players its better to just never do it.
Never = No
Nice video brah
6:25 nice swap bruh LEL
I hope this channel grows and you're able to make good income from youtube because I've really been enjoying these videos and look forward to your new channel videos as well. You could do daily vlogs of whatever you do anyways during the day and I am sure you would be able to grow a good following from that.
cool shirt man
Full vid?
Hey Doug, have you ever thought about calling this series Poulke... I'm just kidding. Nice video
dude it is a polarizing bet, as you said colman is representing 2pair+ hands ... so if you are calling with an ace of a jack you have to call with K high as well.
Doug polk really improved my game. I'm hustling everyone now
You can learn more from watching 5 minutes of one of Doug's videos than you can from watching 5 days of any other videos...
LOL!
Think I'd rather call/raise with Negreanus hand there than just a jack because blockers.
There was no mis read. Heads up king high will be good a pretty good amount. Daniel just had a feeling that was wrong is my guess.
Looks like a fighter taking the dive to me.
polker hands, YES!
Actually mr Polk, a ten of spades is likely a bit more interesting of a turn card. I guess it doesn’t improve Coleman’s hands like the ace did tho.
In this whole heads up, Colman seemed to have a good edge on Negreanu. There were a few situations from which one could assume that.
A lot of players get way too sticky on paired board and way to counter that is use big sizing on paired board.
Hi Doug, love your vids, have you ever thought about changing your name to Doug Poke, that would make it so cool, Doug Poke's Poker Hands!
I hate it when people call their hands that way before turning them over, like ''full house.. not sure if this is good?"
bronzer tutorial next
Not like Daniel but understandable call down particularly when the board pairs otr. Colemand is super polarized with this sizing. Has air or is super strong.
Lol people calm down with the call this polker hands crap....just enjoy the damn video
it was funny the first 34 times. 35th time it got kind of old.
From Negranu' spot, would it be a bad move to jam on the turn?
I had the same thought.
Why jam the turn? That would be such an awful line to take
Because it's unlikely he'd get out of this hand if he doesn't hit the river , by calling 3 streets i think you become the fish since vilain is taking you straight to value town.
In the other hand with a shove, you make that 2 pair on a tough spot plus even if he calls you still got a lot of outs on the river.
(at least that's how i see it in my head)
But two pair is never folding there, so I don't get your logic?
+Nazim You obv haven't played much heads up, hand values change radically when 2 people play nearly 100% of their range, it's blinds battle on steroids basically top pair decent kicker=monster ags good tag opponent... good luck trying to make two pair fold.
is he trolling us with the lip gloss?
My IQ goes up a tick listening to Doug Poker
You see Coleman's face after he flipped his hand. Like he's not good, or there's a chance he could have the worst hand. He was like "full house?". Smug fuck. Doug you think you could be my new dad? Fuck that sign?
3 bet flop 5.6BB, CR turn, fold river...all better decisions imho at each point. Love to replay w those decisions and see how it plays out. $1M buy in. No bracelet. More pressure
nice tee, you play guitar?
Cha'alt!
Hey poker. Have you ever considered calling the series selbst hands? It would just make more sense.
you should change your channel name to Doug Polker
Man the title killed the plot since the flop :D
I don't get the whole thing about Negreanu's KQ being too weak to call. Coleman's range is polarized on the river. How would a one pair hand, for example, be any better in this situation?
Couldn't colman be bluffing with a jack or an eight thinking that Daniel has him beat?
robin luongo
If he would bluff those hands (especially the jack) rather than showdown, I suppose you are right. I just think Coleman is much more likely to have complete air or a nuttish hand.
the other thing is that a pair acts as a MUCH better blocker than a non spade king. which makes it being air more likely. If he had a 4/8/J here he makes it much less likely that dan gets to here with a full house so he blocks more full houses.
he also leaves more bluffs open if he doesn't have the Q of spades, leaving open the K Q as a possibility for the other person to have and to have got to the turn the same way daniel did and then bricking on the river.
of course by him not having the spade he leaves it more likely the opponent could be bluffing with a spade and missed his flush.
But yea mostly it's that anytime you pair you make it less likely the other guy has his. I mean if he just has say A 5 he makes it much less likely the other guy has A 4 which makes makes you take that out of his range.
In this case he has that but yea it's mostly about pairs meaning that there are less full house combos and more bluff combos that are reasonable.
Don Ziolkowski
Good points!
He must have put him on the 10Q with the ten of spades.
8:39 LOL lon is somehow correct even though he completely butchers what a thin value bet means
who won in the end?
Colman won for $15.3 mill, DN $8.3 mill
Haralabob had at least 40% of Colman methinks.
Colman outplayed Daniel in that heads up pretty badly.
if I didn't have to watch you in order to see poker stuff , I wouldn't. so another channel is probably out of the question.
FISH!!!!!!
The internet only win when they catch their miracle card. When there cards don't come, they don't know how to play and they are severely outmatched by his like NEGREANU
daniel thought he has 9T
NEGREANU FLOATS THE FLOP AND TURN AND THIS HAPPENS!
Doug, why should Negreanu be checking with all of his hands? When Daniel checks the turn, you say this is “as he should [be doing] with all of his hands.” Why is that?
2022
Does anybody who uses the word nonplussed have any idea what it really means?
LMAO
This is where it went all bad for Daniel.
The villain origin story
when u say "off suit" 4, do u just mean any suit that doesn't complete a flush? i hear u say that a lot. thx
I gotta disagree with you here Doug, you say Negreanu has to call here if he has an Ace but with Colman's bet on the river being so polarized, isn't Ax and KQ essentially the same thing?
nope, as Ax connected and KQ is nothing but the nut no pair.
Benni Plex I don't think you understand that Colman is repping a flush or better with that bet. That's what 'polarized' means. Colman is never betting a J an 8 or just a lone ace this way. This is why negreanu finds a call here. I guess I don't really expect you to understand this thought process.
Not in the sense that KQ blocks a lot of the bluffs that Coleman can have which then skews Coleman's range to more value than it would if Neg. had Ax, which would block a few of Coleman's value hands
Alex that isn't what polarized means at all and Colman isn't repping a flush at all
Benni Plex I'm curious, what exactly do you think Colman is repping here?
doug I think that comes Ruzitska your video, I think he played the best final table
Change it to Polker Hands
"I thought I was good there." THAT SAID, he wasn't. Kappa
I feel like he tailors the advice
to suit his knowledge of players' holdings.
This hand lost first for him.
doug polk has one million dollars of poker winnings, why cannot he decorare his apartment or buy backdrop??
I dno't understand, why is 18 into 24 big?
Half his stack heads up for a bracelet
hey nice bronzer
WHAT ARE THE FUCKING STARTING STACKS?!?
That said...
Does Tom Dwan live?
doug teaching negreanu poker ? XD hahahha ok
first
You should call this Polka hands and play nice Polka music in the background.
Many of those pokerplayers are such weirdos like colman
Negreanu in my mind has always been over rated. What Negreanu understands is that if you always call out your read, people tend to remember your good reads more than your bad ones. In my perspective he breaks about 50/50. I think he likes to call. I'm bias against Negreanu because he's o.k. with rake increases. So I can't stand him. But I've always thought he was a calling station and over rated even when I thought he was a decent guy. Now I think he's a greedy sell out. Who's ok with gouging players.
I hate that bastard