We're seeing a lot of people signing up for Fishers Network, looking for help, looking for job opportunities, and wanting Catholic networking. We won't be able to respond to those needs if Catholic business leaders don't step up and lead. If you're an entrepreneur, business owner, executive, manager, academic administrator, or some other professional leader, consider forming a Fishers Network Crew now to respond to this urgent and vital need in the Church: fishersnetwork.com.
I wish I was a businessman or leader in my profession because then I would join in a heatbeat. Our businessmen and professionals being networked in a Catholic society is extremely important. It may prove decisive one day.
Indeed, Catholic businessmen have nothing to lose and everything to gain by networking with one another and mentoring folks who wish to start new businesses. Only family can build a more loyal business network than this.
A true Christian cannot support lies and the pope is supporting climate change agenda which is a complete lie. Communists are faking it with the weather weapons. They will try to destroy the True Church of Jesus Christ with science--albeit fake science.
As a Freemason - I have seen a picture - and excommunicate Archbishop Fulton Sheen knew what "the plan" was. When the Freemason Antipope John XXIII started his "Vatican II Sect," with duped former Catholics he knew exactly what he was doing. So did the sacrilegious Freemason who put together the UNauthorized "Novus Ordo." So he plays with those whom he will dupe - and those who are duped consider him - posthumously - prophetic.
Brian, you’ve done a great job of explaining/clarifying where we are today. We need to keep that balance - be aware and never lose sight of the promises of God. Especially His promise about the gates of hell will not prevail against the church. Many times I’ve had to bring myself back from focusing on the moment and realize I keep trying to put God in a ‘box’. He is still sovereign. He is still the great I AM. What a comfort that He has and does continue to care so much for us that He has shared some things to be prepared. But our eyes MUST always stay firmly on Him!! Thank you, Brian. (I’m 80 yrs old and the journey is amazing!).
God bless you, truly. My grandmother reposed at 79 last year. A lot of us young people in the church have a similar story. Where our parents are not necessarily super committed to their beliefs, but that our grandparents are and they were the initial relatives who planted the seeds in us early on. My grandmother was devout and had a very personal relationship with our Lord. It inspires me every day. Grandparents are a blessing from God, and I loved mine dearly. And you're right. It's easy to get caught up in the current events in the church, but studying church history, we've been through much worse and made it out okay. We will make it out of this okay as well.
True! As the Psalmist says, proclaim the might deeds of Yahweh for He is faithful! Faith should have a better grip in us than fear and fear mongering. Faith has brought the church beyond the persecution of the early Christians to what it is now, through the blood of the saints. It is now our time to carry on the torch of faith and it starts with trusting Christ through His Church He built on Peter.
YOU: Especially His promise about the gates of hell will not prevail against the church. *ME: Peter said that Jesus established a SPIRITUAL house comprised of Believers that are indwelled by the Holy Spirit* -- 1Peter 2:5-6 -- *the promises that Jesus made in Matthew 16:18-19 are for the "EKKLESIA/assembled BELIEVERS/the called out ones" that are part of this SPIRITUAL house -- part of Christ's SPIRITUAL Body.* Jesus didn't make those promises to a PHYSICAL religious system with easily corrupted religious leaders as WARNED by the Apostles in. Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-6, etc
Beth, please read the books of Romans and Hebrews for yourself -- they are simple to understand -- ask the Holy Spirit to teach you Truth -- you will be AMAZED at the wonderful truth that is written there by the Apostle....
I think we (the Catholic Church) is in a very, very serious situation and I think the leaders in Rome need to go to Confession. It’s pretty bad when the the leaders promote people in serious sins to be bishops and cardinals while holy priests are canceled. I believe Jesus will protect the Church but the leaders in Rome seriously need to confess their lewd ideas.
Why are you surprised that church leadership are evil wolves teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles ?? *The Apostles WARNED you it would happen -- Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-6, etc*
I think what people need to realize is that, there have been FAR worse points in time in every regard compared to today. In terms of violence, corruption, disbelief, degeneracy. If you lived during the French revolution you’d think it was surely the apocalypse. Nothing is new under the sun.
@@carolynkimberly4021 imagine having a Borgia as Pope while the Turks are ransacking half of Christendom with mass forced conversion. Or with the Protestant wars. It’s been horrifically bad in the past.
@@paulheiberger4977 : agree! In addition, the Vatican's 'fraternity' with the WEF and the Communists doesn't bode well for the protection of the sheep.
Nice! Ive been reading and rereading Communism and the Conscience of the West the past few years, and it's becoming one of my favorites. I'm happy to hear you namedrop it, because it's about so, so much more than communism and every Catholic should read it. I try to read a little bit of Fulton Sheen every day, and it really makes a difference when I remember. I truly believe the man had the gift of prophecy.
As a recent convert to the Catholic Faith, I get confused when I here other Catholics taking bad about the Pope or Vatican II. I appreciate your videos, they help me immensely. God bless you! Viva Christo Rey
"...his religion will be a Brotherhood..." Sheen says, aka, the Masonic Fraternity, a Christless brotherhood of man. Those who know it's happening see it clearly while those who deny it's happening will never see it because it's already happening in front of them and they still don't see it. February 10, 2021 (LifeSitenews) - For the second time in less than five months, the Gran Logia de España, Spain’s main masonic lodge, has expressed its profound satisfaction at Pope Francis’s involvement in the “Human Fraternity” initiative launched in Abu Dhabi on February 4, 2019. This time, the Spanish Freemasons published a long message welcoming the first ever International Day of Human Fraternity a few days ago, again on February 4, during which Pope Francis, together with Grand Imam Ahmad al-Tayyeb, bestowed an award for peace and fraternity on U.N. secretary general António Guterres in an online ceremony.
The whole freemasonry thing is a joke. Our problems do not stem from freemasons. Those guys in Spain are probably typical liberals so of course they love Pope Francis. Those who fixate on freemasons and other conspiracy theories are simply unable to comprehend the real world.
But did the Church ever become pro-Freemason? No, freemasonry is still considered grounds for excommunication iirc. Just because the Freemasons approve of something the Church does doesn’t mean that thing is bad
@@drjanitor3747 if gay people in the church is the only evidence for the Ape of the Church, then we're nowhere near. The Middle Ages had popes fathering children and holding massive orgies, things are nowhere near as bad today
Freemasonry demands that you become a man of God, and are active in your respective faith. The antichrist or ape of the Church won't come from the Masonic Lodge.
The Abu Dhabi declaration saying that God wills the plurality and diversity of all religions is a blatantly heretical statement. It’s such an offense to the cross of Christ.
The Ape of the Church is now clearly dominating the Holy Church with pride, self will and self love, justification and promoting mortal sin, errors, heresies, and lies which is contrary to the Truth, contrary to poverty; contrary to humilty, and gentleness; contrary to chastity; contrary to obedience of God's Will.
A happy side note: When in Mark and Matthew Jesus says only His Father knows the hour, he’s playing off a Jewish idiom from the 1st century…it’s what the groom would say about his wedding, because the father of the groom invited all the guests. Or when He tells the disciples He is going to prepare a room for them…this was also a reference to preparation for the wedding. Jesus thinks of the “end times” as preparations for the wedding banquet of the lamb (see Revelation 19). Read “Jesus the Bridegroom by Dr. Brant Pitre and let Christian hope swallow anxiety.
Fr. Kramer's explanation of the book of Apocalypse chapter 12:1-5 "Church suffers the keenest pangs passing at that time through the greatest crisis of her whole life. In that travail, she gives birth to some definite “person” who is to RULE the Church with a rod of iron (verse 5). It then points to a conflict waged within the Church to elect one who was to “rule all nations” in the manner clearly stated. In accord with the text this is unmistakably a PAPAL ELECTION, for only Christ and His Vicar have the divine right to rule ALL NATIONS. Furthermore, the Church does not travail in anguish at EVERY papal election which can be held without trouble or danger. But at this time the great powers may take a menacing attitude to hinder the election of the logical and expected candidate by threats of a general apostasy, assassination or imprisonment of this candidate if elected. This would suppose an extremely hostile mind in the governments of Europe towards the Church and would cause intense anguish to the Church, because an extended interregnum in the papacy is always disastrous and more so in a time of universal persecution. If Satan would contrive to hinder a papal election, the Church would suffer great travail. …As a dragon, Satan through the evil world-powers of that time will enter the Church, interfere with her liberty and perhaps by stealthy suggestions having long before directed the choosing of candidates for the episcopate will now endeavor by threats of force to hinder the election of the worthiest candidate for the papacy." (Herman Bernard Kramer, The Book of Destiny [TAN Books Reprint, 1975], pp. 277-279) The Church has been eclipsed for 65 years.
Sensus Fidelium has some really good homilies explaining from the church fathers who the antichrist will be, the end times ect. For example according to church fathers the Antichrist would not be a pope. He would be of Jewish descent from the tribe of Dan. He would rebuild the Jewish temple.
Yes, Thessalonians specifically says, the Antichrist will sit in the Temple of God. This is the Seat of Peter? In the Catholic Church. The Pope, sits in the seat of Peter, right?
We now have a church under Rome, which promotes ecumenism over doctrine, and fraternity above the singularity of the Christ. Both place man's natural dignity above divine law. Certainly it can get worse, but what should we expect, rhat the ape of the Church suddenly pop into existence. that it won't retain some validity from percieved 'continuity' with the Apostolic Church, and by this deceivethe elect? I fear we are so deep into this confusion we cannot see what is going on. Yet, Francis has made it very clear, for those willing to hear, that he has a deeply Protestant soteriology, and a very liberal form of Protestantism at that. He is a naturalist who puts human sensibility and 'inate sacred dignity' above every doctrine. This is in keeping with the evolutionary Christology of the assent of man that the mid century mods were so enamored with. Though never overtly said, if you listen for Francis' assumptions, you hear his deep Modernism, that religion is a function of human creativity, and thus should serve the conscience of man as this is its source. Is Francis the end of this inversion? Not likely, as he is not its beginning. But to assume the Roman church is still Christocentric from its highest seat, is to be blind to the cult of man it has been transforming into.
The Fathers of Vatican I and the subsequent Magisterium would shudder at your words. Rome cannot defect from the faith. The true Church is never apart from Rome.
@@Quekksilber so is indefectibility a normative promise only, that whatever a bishop of Rome says is true even if he contradicts *directly* what previous popes said. Or is it the duty of a true pope to defend the Faith as delivered from the Apostles, and so we should see indefectibility as demonstrably true. That is interpreted without contradiction. If the only infallible teaching of the Church is Papal infallibility, this doctrine is without foundation, for or Lord made many other declarations we must adhere to, not just the primary of the See of Peter. If a man claiming to be Peter's successor teaches a foreign gospel, we must conclude then, that either the Holy Spirit is capricious regarding dogma and discipline, or that we have had false claims to the Chair of Peter. The later is possible, the former is impossible.
@@williamthesamaritan I never made the claim that the only infallible teaching authority is the See of Peter. The infallible teaching authority of the Church is never without Peter. We might also conclude that we are interpreting said successor in bad faith. This third one is also very much possible.
@@Quekksilber Of course this should be our first self check. But we are way past that with Francis. Reading someone in good faith who is in bad faith--regarding the duty of his office--is not virtuous.
It's funny that Fulton Sheen called it the "Ape of the Church"; an intelligent friend of mine suggested I learn more about the Scopes Monkey Trial. It seems to me the 8th of the church is actually exemplified perfectly in that trial: nobody in that trial wanted any Divine authority whatever. The Protestants who wanted prayer did not want it as handed down from the bishops. The atheists who wanted authority wanted the authority of men in lab coats, but again not of bishops on the matter of religion. And the media manifestly always wants a bloodbath. Every controversy in the media that Catholics get harangued about has followed the exact same damn pattern. They portray the people who want god without a head and the people who want a head without God. But never the ones who think God's head can be known and followed.
I won't comment on the good or bad state of the Catholic church but I think the fact that Christendom as a whole is divided into so many factions is already bad enough. There has to be a way we can all come together. 🕊✌
YOU: There has to be a way we can all come together *ME: Peter said that GOD's church was SPIRITUAL comprised of Believers who are indwelled by the Holy SPIRIT* -- see 1Peter 2:5-6 -- *true Believers are UNITED together because we are all indwelled by the SAME Holy Spirit* -- see 1Corinth 12:12-14. PHYSICAL churches/denominations are all corrupted with wolfish leadership teaching some form of false doctrines -- *as WARNED by the Apostles in Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc.*
Another video wherein the commentator exchanges the hints of the coming end times’ scenario for the fact that it is not fully present. No, the ape of the church is not yet in full swing, but it is definitely taking shape before our eyes.
First the scripture says " If it were possible, the very elect would be fooled.." It won't be possible for the elect to be fooled. So what makes us "elect" ?
Thank you! It certainly isn't waltzing through life like a fool who thinks he can't get fooled. I've looked at lines like that as responsibilities to live up to. It seems analagous to the many protestants I've met who sin and never confess or make amends even, and think "thank God I'm saved".
@@loulasher I know right , I take the story about " depart from me I never knew you seriously" ...I mean these people were convinced they were serving God , doing miracles in Jesus name , casting out demons ect ect. So I'm not so " convinced" of my salvation. I won't be until I hear those words " well done my good and faithful servant."
Dear Mr. Holdsworth. That is a snazzy vest. I wanted to alert you in case you weren't aware that it's not working well on camera because it's giving off moire patterns. It is quite distracting, especially when you move or fidget because it draws even more attention to it. Thanks for your content.
I believe it is equally dangerous to suggest that the faithful blindly accept the pronouncements of a man who sits in Peter's chair. The erosion of faith will likely not occur in an instant, but rather one step at a time.
The erosion of the Faith certainly began in earnest at Vat II. The modernist/Masonic/Communist cabal had grown in numbers of prelates, and forcefully seized the council. From then on, we have been witnessing the 'rotten fruits' of the council.
Super helpful Brian, I struggle with this stuff particularly around Fatima and the many Marion apparitions where she speaks about apostasy from the top… have you read Windswept House by Fr Malachi Martin?
Malachi Martin was a conman who had to be thrown out of his order for having multiple affairs with married women. He got thrown out, then had to make money so he began writing fiction, something that compulsive liars are very good at. He has a long string of lies that have been found out about him. He writes good ghost stories and conspiracy novels, but that is about it. None of it has any connection to the truth. But he made a lot of money with those stories.
Indeed! Faith in Christ is to trust the Church He established to have a teaching authority, Holy Scripture and Sacred Traditions in a congregation of the faithfuls. The focal point of the Body of Christ, the Bride of Christ that guides us to Him so that we may not be lost. The church is the boat we ride with Christ towards our conversion to be humble sons and daughters of God worthy to be with Him in His kingdom. Christ is with us to calm the wind, the seas and the storm in this journey with the church and must not let fear and anxiety take hold of us, lest we think that the boat we are in with Christ is sinking. When that happens within us, that is where the church of the apes will take hold. That is what the devil wants. That he relentlessly attacks the bride of Christ so that the church of the apes will grow within us with Satan dragging us away from Christ and His church.
Antichrist will be the apparent solution to problems... We're not at Antichrist stage, we're still at the start of the problems stage. Can't offer a solution until the problems and the reaction.
YOU: we're still at the start of the problems stage *ME: No. For those that have actually read the book of The Revelation and other Bible prophetic books -- we are on the EDGE and will tumble over at any moment.* But even history books about the Great Empires (Greek, Rome, etc) show that one of the LAST things to happen before the Empire crumbles, is the general acceptance of hom0sexuality. We're about to plummet .....
pray for Israel pray for Jews, pray for the peace of Jerusalem....this is a great point by the speaker here; Jesus can come when ever the Father has planned...but yes pray for Israel to enter the Church in large numbers.
Israel does not have to "enter the Church" -- *according to the Apostle Paul in Romans 11:25-32, there is coming a point in Time when GOD is FINISHED/completed gathering in the gentiles* -- most Christians see this as the harpazo/rapture of the believers mentioned in 1Thes 3:14-18 -- *and when this happens, GOD will turn His attention to saving the JEWS.* End time prophecy in the book of The Revelation is for the JEWS -- see Rev 7, Rev 12, Rev 15:3, etc -- it is the Jew's tribulation or Jacob's Trouble mentioned in Jeremiah 30:7,11.
@@veritasmuy2407 Catholic doctrine 1. Gospel will be heard spread to most/all includes 2/ Israel and Jews in large number entering Church 3 a time of peace 4 a falling away 5 a persecution of a remnant Church then the 2nd coming
@@jrimmer4987 LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. *According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc* -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- *its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble* -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- *there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews* -- see Revelation 11 -- *and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help* -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- *which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon)* -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- *Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS* (Matthew 2:2) *returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years* (Revelation 19) -- *then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire* -- see Revelation 20. *This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire* -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- *and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD* -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- *and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies* -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc *If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John* -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews -- see Revelation 11 -- and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon) -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS (Matthew 2:2) returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years (Revelation 19) -- then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire -- see Revelation 20. This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews -- see Revelation 11 -- and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon) -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS (Matthew 2:2) returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years (Revelation 19) -- then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire -- see Revelation 20. This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
Brian, your understanding about the protection of Christ for the church, opens you to a massive blow upon your shield of faith! The Katechon teaching will help you see the trajectory, for the Vatican. and simply put, its nothing good..........
I don't understand how you can believe that the Vatican will somehow seat the Antichrist, and simultaneously think that this doesn't make Christ a liar saying that he will build His indefectible Church on Peter as the Rock. The true Church is never apart from Rome and Peter.
I didn't mention anything about the anti christ but, I will address your last comment. That misunderstanding is going to cause you a problem.....Rome will Burn! Look at the Katechon, principle it will help you in the time ahead. - cheers @@Quekksilber
Saint Alphonsus Ma. Liguori teaches in his book “La Messa e l'Officio strapazzati, ovvero Avvertimenti a' sacerdoti” (1822) that before the coming of the Antichrist the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass will be abolished/prohibited for 1290 days…
The Last Battle is worthwhile reading for any Christian, it has a lot to say about heaven and hell and the final things. The other Narnia books are also quite prophetic.
Tolkien? CS Lewis?? How about stop with those pretentious western fiction writers who are also chewed up cliches & start reading Saints & Church fathers 🤦
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxyThere are many roads that lead to Rome, Tolkien and Lewis were geniuses in their own way, mostly on telling stories, but also on a philosophical level. Some people understand better from church fathers or Thomas Aquinas, and some more from Tolkien or Lewis
@@jeannebouwman1970 Brother, no they are not, they are pagan fiction writers. Read the Ecumenical Councils, which clearly state that entertainment is incompatible with Christian life. Also many of Aquinas' speculations were unbiblical un-church fathers & heretical, which lead the Catholic Church to Modalism.
Faith in Christ is to trust the Church He established to have a teaching authority, Holy Scripture and Sacred Traditions in a congregation of the faithfuls. The focal point of the Body of Christ, the Bride of Christ that guides us to Him so that we may not be lost. The church is the boat we ride with Christ towards our conversion to be humble sons and daughters of God worthy to be with Him in His kingdom. Christ is with us to calm the wind, the seas and the storm in this journey with the church and we must not let fear and anxiety take hold of us, lest we might think that the boat we are in with Christ is sinking. When that happens within us, that is where the church of the apes will take hold and what the devil wants. That is why he relentlessly attacks the bride of Christ so that the church of the apes will grow within us to drag us away from Christ and His church.
While it is necessary to observe what is happening within the church now, it's also important to reflect on which OT/NT prophecies have yet to be fulfilled. Of concern to me is the movement towards and acceptance of one world religion and digital currency (implantation of financial digital chips, already being used in humans to purchase items). Forced implementation of central bank digital currency (cashless society), is in my view, a precursor to the fulfilment of the mark of the beast.
The Mark of the Beast is more likely something like a Creed. The imagery of the forehead and the right hand is already known since Deuteronomy where God says "Hear o Israel, The Lord is One..." God tells Israel to keep these words on their right hand and their forehead meaning that our mind and actions should be permeated by the Commandments of God and His Revelation.
*Heresy is to contradict the Apostles/New Testament.* It is not a denial of grace. For example: *The Apostle taught that Satan was crushed/defeated by ONE MAN/Jesus dying on the wooden cross -- see Hebrews 2:14* -- the SEED of Israel (Isaiah 65:9) has ALREADY crushed Satan's head/power (Genesis 3:15) -- *so to teach that Mary crushes Satan* (no Biblical verses) *is heresy that contradicts the Apostle/Original Church that wrote the NT for us.*
Always good to keep perspective and not go off half cocked. However, I think as to the conversion of the Jews I think it held that many will be converted at the preaching of Enoch and Elias during the great tribulation. Thus that would be DURING the time of the antichrist. That being said, even in light of great apostacy , we are likely not yet in the full reign of the antichrist and the Church is not wholly compromised.
6:01 I really don't like the idea, that the church feels it is necessary for God's plan to succeed, that they personally take political action. It's like hearing a Christian say that it is necessary to maintain the modern nation-state of Israel in its present form (and I am not going to argue one way or another on that particular topic). As if allowing it to change or dissolve would ruin God's plan for all time. As if God cannot fulfill his plan without our help, and as if there can be no future state of Israel as disconnected from the modern state as the modern state is from the ancient state. God doesn't need our help to keep the world's jews alive so they can convert and fulfill prophecy. What jews there are at that future date will acknowledge Christ as king, regardless of how many there are and regardless of our acts to preserve or destroy them. The collective power and will of all of mankind does not have the strength to "prevent the second coming from happening." That would be absurd.
Being child like in faith is important I think as per Jesus. As they only look at the facts. We get confused and wrong when we have a lot to loose and will diminish our ability to judge and come to a conclusion. Only a childlike has the capacity to say that the King is naked. For many it’s weighing how much are we to loose if we say anything. Even at Jesus’ time only simple people understood to true identity of Jesus. For a child like person it’s crystal clear what’s happening at the top of the church. And the current pontiff is the perfect candidate to be an antichrist as he works against the teachings of Christ. In the past saints never had anything to loose other than Christ, so they only wanted Christ and stood for Christ. Not for the world.
For a child like person it would be perfectly clear that no Pontiff can ever be the seat of the Antichrist, as that would instantly make Christ a liar. Even to say that he works against the teachings of Christ... *And on this rock I will build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail it.* "The words - and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it - proclaim and establish the authority of which we speak. "What is the it?" (writes Origen). "Is it the rock upon which Christ builds the Church or the Church? The expression indeed is ambiguous, as if the rock and the Church were one and the same. I indeed think that this is so, and that neither against the rock upon which Christ builds His Church nor against the Church shall the gates of Hell prevail" (Origenes, Comment. in Matt., tom. xii., n. ii). The meaning of this divine utterance is, that, notwithstanding the wiles and intrigues which they bring to bear against the Church, it can never be that the church committed to the care of Peter shall succumb or in any wise fail. "For the Church, as the edifice of Christ who has wisely built 'His house upon a rock,' cannot be conquered by the gates of Hell, which may prevail over any man who shall be off the rock and outside the Church, but shall be powerless against it" (Ibid.). Therefore God confided His Church to Peter so that he might safely guard it with his unconquerable power." "Wherefore, as appears from what has been said, Christ instituted in the Church a living, authoritative and permanent Magisterium, which by His own power He strengthened, by the Spirit of truth He taught, and by miracles confirmed. He willed and ordered, under the gravest penalties, that its teachings should be received as if they were His own." Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cogitum
@@Quekksilber sorry, didn’t read your full comment. I think you misread me. If you read me correctly, I said ‘an Antichrist’ in a way where someone is against the teachings of Christ(1 John 2-18) It’s not up to me to judge whether he’s ‘The Antichrist’ who’s to come in the end days.
@@linopaul It doesn't matter whether it is an or The. The pope can never be the Antichrist or even prepare his way. That would totally falsify Catholicism.
@@linopaul Christ said that on this Rock he will build the Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it. He also said that a house that is divided in itself cannot last. Communion with the Holy See is the principle of unity for Christ's Church, as He governs it through Peter and his successors. The head cannot work against the body.
If Sheen is right and we are in this era Then Bishop Sheen fell victim to this ape of the church. We have to remember that he witnessed the 2nd Vatican Council and didn't oppose it. So he was duped as well.
I have to feel lucky that I was born after that time, because the hope for progress in the world was so great, in spite of the cold war and degradation of morals and ridiculous developments in art, that very nearly everyone seems to have been swept up in it. I had a chemistry professor who believed the old slogan "better living through chemistry" which goes along with the idea that between science and engineering we could solve any problem. That it ignored we created most of the problems we would supposedly solve was easy to ignore. I mean it, I would probably have bough it all hook, line, and sinker.
Brother Brian, from whence is your authority to preach-teach to other Catholics? What is your Jurisdiction as per the Catholic precept of permission to preach-teach? Clergy and Religious are required by Canon Law and Ecclesiastic Tradition to proclaim the Gospel to the Faithful, by God. What makes you exempt to teach to the Faithful? What of your fallibility and its consequent error that you are bound to pontificate? Pax Christi in regno Christi
YOU: Clergy and Religious are required by Canon Law and Ecclesiastic Tradition to proclaim the Gospel to the Faithful, by God. *ME: Actually, the Apostles WARNED us that evil wolves would be in church leadership teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles* -- see Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc. *Soooo.... the clergy can be EVIL and teach false doctrines -- the Apostle says that it is MORE NOBLE to search Scripture for yourself to make sure that what you are being taught aligns with GOD's holy Scripture. -- Acts 17:11,* 2Timothy 3:15-17, etc
YOU: What of your fallibility and its consequent error that you are bound to pontificate? *ME: Jesus said that God's people were NOT to call some sinful man on earth their spiritual "pope/papa/father" who claims to be the one with God's infallible truth -- see Matthew 23:9* (1John 2:27). *JESUS also said that God's people are NOT to have one man acting as a "lord/boss" with authority over the people of GOD because that is the system of authority of the pagan gentile kingdoms -- see Matthew 20:25-26* (1Peter 5:3)
I was in a band briefly that was even more briefly called Nuns With Hammers, after the "Plowshares" group that would go onto military bases with hammers and try refashioning modern weaponry and vehicles into farming tools. I don't know how they got on bases, but they didn't get very far before being arrested, which was the real end the expected of their protests.
Slowly but surely you're moving towards schism, Brian. It's a sad sight to see. Praying for you that you are not yet too far down that path to turn around again and come back.
By saying that the current situation is not the ape of the church... That is sending him on the past to schism? I don't understand what you're meaning.
@Brian I need a clarification on the criteria you mentioned wrt the chronology of great deception. As far as I can tell, the two things are the gospel having reached everyone in the world, and the Jews being converted, regrafted, gathered in etc... But not everyone gentile and jew being converted. Am I wrong in my understanding?
Two sides of the same coin the Hyperpapalist (neo-modernist) and the Sedevacantist both deeply misunderstand the historical role of the papacy and the strict limits of infabillity structured by Vatican 1. Pray for them.
Where is the unity of FAITH (the CATHOLIC! faith) of this Conciliar Church, when the vast majority of so called Catholics do not even believe in the Eucharist and a hierarchy that has no problem with the errors of V2, even promoting it?
@@BrianHoldsworth That's a difficult one. 🤔 I'll have to look into it more. To see a conversion of the Jews as a religion I can see. But "all" Jews is difficult to understand. It's abvious not all gentiles will be converted. So we have the "full inclusion " of Jews coming after the " full number of the Gentiles" I would pray that all would come to Christ and His Church , yet that seems doubtful 🤔 I will contemplate this more . Thank You for responding.
Two things: 1- can anything that humans do in this world prevent God from doing something that He wishes to do? Can any human action really prevent the Second Coming? Especially something as crude as killing all Jews? Maybe God will be so disgusted that He chooses not to come again, but that is something different. 2- Of course precious little is known about the Endtime. I think trying to read the signs and predicting this is a fool's game. But if the Ape of the Church is Christianity in reverse, it will not be the Church but only less orthodox and less traditional than we like to see. It will be something totally different. I guess no people in mitres and ritual robes, more like a state ideology. Or something more diffuse, without a clear and rigorous theoretical base. The more diffuse, the harder to pin it down on anything and the harder to fight it. There will always a lot of projection in this, but I envision more like a left-liberal utopia in which religion at all might be tolerated, but is totally marginalised.
There have been plenty of apocalyptic times in the history of the Church. Like when the Arians nearly took over, or during the black death, or when armies of Islam arrived at the gates of Vienna at the same time that Luther was tearing the Church apart. These storms all passed. So it's important not to automatically assume that the present storm or the next one is the final tribulation, it may be or it may not. All you have to do is stay faithful, watch and pray.
It's completely different because in these cases the enemies were external, on this case the enemies are internal. So, even if Brian is right, this could be the first step for the destruction of the church.
@@generic_account2138 No, but Pope Alexander VI was and he was a really bad pope too. That also has nothing to do with what the other guy said. God bless you.
Ape, Catholic or Protestant vs Christ’s true church: Friends, let’s examine how the Apostle views Christ’s true church: 1 Cor 12:4-31! According to Paul: Church members are joined to “Christ” not a particular religion! How are they joined to Him? 1 Cor 12:12-13, 1 Cor 6:17. All believers that are joined to Christ’s church must receive Spirit baptism! Acts 9:17-18, Acts 10:42-48, Mk 1:8! Paul explains how Spirit baptism that joins one spiritually to Christ is then manifested in the natural or physical church? 1 Cor 12:7! All believers once joined to Christ by His Spirit receive gifts? 1 Cor 12:4-11! Spiritual gifts are allocated to each member based on God's wisdom, not man’s, for the good of reaching the lost and nurturing the growth of God's flock! 1 Cor 12:4-31! I suspect that many reading this have been led to believe that their church is the true church; yet, they have never been taught how God defines His church: as a living body, established through Spirit baptism, and empowered in its mission by bestowing spiritual gifts to its members. P.S. The impetus of the true Church is God’s Spirit living in each member, being manifested in the world, and nothing else!
In the second part of the Fatima secret, the Madonna foretold: "The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be destroyed. Finally, My Immaculate Heart will triumph." In a text published in 2009 where anthropologists, largely non-Catholic and even non-believers, discuss the social relevance of Marian apparitions, the role of Brazilian Catholic thinker Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira (1908-1995) as an "untiring promoter of devotion to Fatima" is mentioned. Some critics have wanted to see in Corrêa de Oliveira's interpretation of the Fatima message, foreseeing a period of convulsive crisis called "bagarre" - where indeed "the good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be destroyed" - followed by a Reign of Mary particularly favorable to the Church, where "finally, My Immaculate Heart will triumph," a sort of Catholic version of Protestant millenarianism. The criticism is unfounded. Not only does Corrêa de Oliveira not predict a specific date for these events - which often appears, though not always, in millenarianism - but also, the two crucial elements of the classic Protestant millenarian schema are absent: a visible coming - but "intermediate" compared to the "final" one at the end of the world - of Jesus to the Earth and the disappearance for a thousand years of evil and evildoers. On the contrary, for the Brazilian thinker, representative of the counter-revolutionary school that uses the term "Revolution" to designate the process of de-Christianization that characterized the West since the Renaissance, "the Revolution will continue - and I am sure of this - even in the Reign of Mary. Revolutionary cells will continue to exist and will be even worse than those of today. It seems impossible, but it will be so. Because the rejection of the graces offered in the Reign of Mary will make men worse than they are today." Pope Benedict XVI, when he repeated that the Church took the message of Fatima extremely seriously, was not far from the perspective of tragedies even worse than those humanity had already gone through - in the language of Corrêa de Oliveira, a "bagarre": "It would be an illusion to think that the prophetic mission of Fatima is concluded. [...] Man has been able to unleash a cycle of death and terror, but he cannot interrupt it..." It would have been certainly wrong to attribute to the Pope speculative - truly millenarian - notions about the "when" of the "triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary." His words were not a prediction but a wish introduced by a "may." But even though we do not know the "when," this "triumph" - which Corrêa de Oliveira, following the great French Marian saint so dear to Pope John Paul II, St. Louis de Montfort (1673-1716), called precisely the "Reign of Mary" - is certain because it is "announced" not by the speculations of men but by the voice of the Madonna herself that the Church, in the person of the Pope, welcomed and made her own. The West - here Pope Benedict XVI resumed the great theme of Pope John Paul II of the "new evangelization" - has become, with the crisis of faith, a mission territory: "The field of ad gentes mission appears considerably expanded today and not definable solely based on geographical considerations." And from Portugal, the Pope "[...] repeats to each of you: My brothers and sisters, you must become witnesses with me to the resurrection of Jesus. In fact, if you will not be his witnesses in your environment, who will be in your place?". "In Sacred Scripture, it often appears that God is in search of the righteous to save the city of men, and he does the same here, in Fatima, when the Madonna asks: 'Do you want to offer yourselves to God to endure all the sufferings that He will send you, in an act of reparation for the sins with which He is offended, and in supplication for the conversion of sinners?' (Memoirs of Sister Lucia, I, 162)." The yes of the visionaries will be the first stone for the construction of the kingdom of the Immaculate Heart of Mary only if we know how to accompany it with our yes, day by day.
YOU: the social relevance of Marian apparitions *ME: The "vision of light" at FATIMA that called itself "Mary", was satanic* (see 2Corinth 11:14) -- *it even did the same satanic miracle that the evil AntiChrist will do in Revelation 13:13-14* -- made a ball of fire come down from heaven to earth in the sight of men, and DECEIVED those dwelling on the earth by that miracle. Satan knows the Bible far better than YOU do -- he's well aware of the end time horrendous prophecies -- just because he comes to you as a vision of light and tells you what the Bible says, doesn't mean its really Mary being prophetic. Sheeeeesh
@@veritasmuy2407 As is known, Protestant brethren do not worship Mary. (It's not strange that those who don't have the Church, Zion, Mary as Mother aren't orphaned? Yet, you are a brother!) The reason for not venerating the Madonna is based on the fact that according to Luther, man, after original sin, is deeply corrupted, and the grace of God does not transform him internally. In other words, it does not make him go from sinner to saint, from unjust to just. And even the Madonna would find herself in the same condition as sinners. Mary would have been only the channel through which God used to come into the world. But otherwise, she would also be part of sinful humanity. Protestants recognize the virginity of Mary in the conception of Jesus, but not her virginity during and after childbirth. And primarily because for them, the only source of Revelation is Sacred Scripture. According to Catholics and Orthodox, Sacred Scripture must be read in the light of Tradition, which complements it and guarantees its authentic interpretation. Undoubtedly, at the center of Christian life is Our Lord, the Way, the Truth, and the Life (Jn 14:6). Christian life essentially consists of encountering Christ, welcoming Him, being grafted into Him, and in Him possessing God, who is eternal Life. But just as corruption entered the world through the sin of Adam and Eve, so redemption passes-precisely because the Lord willed it-through the new Adam, who is Christ, and the new Eve, who is Mary, the highest image and expression of the Church. The Madonna is undoubtedly not on the same level as the Lord because she herself was wondrously redeemed by her Son. But Jesus Himself wanted her by His side. He wanted to be introduced into the world by her. He wanted to be introduced into public life by her in Cana of Galilee. On the cross, He entrusted her to us as Mother in the order of grace. And on Pentecost, we see her among the Apostles and other people in the Upper Room. Her presence, however, is noted in a singular way: "All these were persevering with one mind in prayer, together with some women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and His brothers" (Acts 1:14). Therefore, the Madonna, as she has a special role in the life of Christ, also has it towards the Church. Not because we establish it, but because Our Lord wanted it. Christocentrism-rightly referenced by you-is not in opposition to devotion to the Madonna. On the contrary, turning to Mary is the shortest, most beautiful, and most fruitful way to reach our Lord, to holiness. Mary, in fact, is entirely Christ-centered. Indeed, she is the most successful Christocentrism. The Lord Himself places it in our hands to make it our own. We entrust ourselves to Mary. To filially entrust oneself to the blessed Virgin is not an exceptional and unexpected act for the family of Jesus' disciples. It is rather rediscovering a familiarity with the Mother of God and surrendering to her affectionate care for us, which are feelings of always; it is even rediscovering a fundamental aspect of our original identity as living members of Christ. We were entrusted to Mary the very moment we were born as a redeemed people by the blood of the Lord. From the heights of the cross, the Only Begotten Son of God with salvation and new life gave us a mother: "Behold, your mother!" He said to us. That woman, who witnessed agonizing but unweakened the agony of her Son and the frustration of every earthly expectation, has become the reason and source of our hope. That spirited creature, pierced in soul (cf. Lk 2:35) and wounded in heart, has become the cause of our joy. Her immaculate fidelity, which led her to Calvary and intimately associated her with the sacrifice that renewed the universe, remains the support of our faith and our decision to live according to the Gospel. At the foot of the cross, we became simultaneously the property of Christ the Savior and children of His beloved mother. The tenacious bond that connects us to her thus arises with the very origin of our condition as Christians. We entrust to her our children, so that they may encounter Christ, the sense and center of existence, and so that their youth may not be lost pursuing myths without truth and false joys. We entrust the suffering, the sick, the poor, who are still among us and await every day from everyone a little fraternity. We entrust the fate of our society, so that work may not be lacking for anyone, so that we never forget to live together in serenity and mutual respect, so that no one is ever denied the right to express themselves in real freedom, so that violence does not prevail, so that the culture of life is affirmed, so that the longing of men for peace is not disappointed. We all entrust ourselves to Mary, with our hopes and fears, with our yearnings for good and our inner defeats, with our intentions and our pains. Today, the Mother-who was given to us by a Crucified One-welcomes us all and reassures us. At a certain point, you will find (and it is a singular grace) that there is no better way to meet Christ and unite with Him than with Mary, a present, maternal, and living presence in the marvelous communion of the Saints in which Christ has inserted us. Christ has given the Madonna as Mother to each of us in the order of grace, and He has also given her to us as Mother of the Church. Is it not appropriate for the Mother to make her presence felt even through Apparitions? In any case, God has decided so. Marian apparitions serve precisely to remind and explain Divine Revelation. They add nothing to it. Does it seem sensible to say that the apparitions of the Madonna at Fatima are all works of the devil? Evangelicals, like all Protestants, have a fundamental fault. And it is to explain Scripture according to private interpretation contrary to what Scripture itself says they have received from the Church: "First of all, you must understand this: no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by human will, but men and women moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God" (2 Peter 1:20-21). By doing so, they not only deprive believers of the right understanding of Sacred Scriptures but also of many precious goods, such as the intercession of Mary and the Saints, against the clear teaching of the Scriptures themselves.
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: As is known, Protestant brethren do not worship Mary. *ME: Neither did the Original Church that KNEW Mary -- please find one verse written in the NT by the guys that KNEW Mary that says:* Mary was sinless, Mary was immaculately conceived, Mary is the mediator between Believers and Jesus, Mary is the mother of all believers, Mary crushes Satan, Mary is co-Redemptrix, Jesus is the SEED of Mary, etc....... *NONE. Because ALL of the above ADDED false traditions about Mary CONTRADICT the Original Church/New Testament.* For example: Rome teaches that Mary is the mediator between Believers and Jesus -- *which contradicts the Apostle in John 14:13-14,23 which states that Believers are to go DIRECTLY TO JESUS with our prayers/requests.* Rome teaches that Mary crushes Satan -- *which contradicts the Apostle in Hebrews 2:14 which states that Satan was crushed/defeated by ONE MAN/Jesus dying on the wooden cross.* Rome teaches that Mary is the mother of all believers -- *which contradicts JESUS in John 19:25-27 and Matthew 12:46-50.* NOTICE that in Matthew 12:46-50 that Jesus did NOT say that believers were his brothers and sisters and Mary was the "mother" of all ???? WHO does Jesus say is his true "mother" in the Kingdom of GOD ???
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: fundamental fault. And it is to explain Scripture according to private interpretation contrary to what Scripture itself *ME: You mean like how Rome privately interprets John 19:25-27 and says it is Jesus making Mary the mother of ALL believers ?? Don't ignore verse 25, Did Jesus tell ALL of the believers at the foot of his cross that Mary was THEIR mother ??* No. Jesus selected ONE believer (John) out of the group of believers and told that ONE believer to take care of Mary's physical needs as he would his own mother, and from that hour that ONE believer took Mary to his own private home/property. *John NEVER referred to himself as "John" in any of his writings -- he always referred to himself as some form of "the disciple whom Jesus loved"* -- see John 13:23, John 20:2, John 21:7, John 21:20, etc. So John is talking about ONLY John in John 19:25-27 -- John isn't talking about YOU. *Just like you can NOT insert yourself into John 13:23, you also can NOT insert yourself into John 19:25-27.* Heresy and false private interpretations come from Rome.
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: And primarily because for them, the only source of Revelation is Sacred Scripture *ME: Because Jesus was all about Sola Scriptura. Jesus said to SEARCH the Scripture (John 5:39).* Jesus said that he FULFILLED Scripture (Luke 24:44). *Jesus said that God's people ERRED because they did not know Scripture (Matthew 22:29).* Jesus used God's written Scripture to CORRECT the false doctrines of God's religious leaders (Matthew 19:4-6), *Jesus rejected and disobeyed the ADDED traditions of God's religious leaders (Matthew 15:1-9).* Jesus even used written Scripture to defeat the temptations of Satan in Matthew 4 ("it is written") *Shouldn't CHRISTians be like Christ ???* Paul says YES !! (Acts 17:11, 2Tim 3:15-17 Rome says NO !! ROME says that GOD's people do not need to search/know Scripture, just know Rome's Catechism (opinions, interpretations). ROME says that Scripture can not correct Rome's doctrines. ROME says that their added traditions are equal to Scripture. ROME says that repetitively chanting Mary's mantra/rosary will defeat the temptations of Satan. Heresy, thy name is Rome.
Just an FYI the Church list three principal signs that will come before the end. The order in which these things will happen is not taught definitively and is a topic of speculation. The 3 signs are 1. The Fulfillment of the Great Commission: Most commonly this is taken to mean that the mere awareness or preaching of the good news of Christ and the Catholic Church has spread out all across the world. Others take this to mean “the universal reign of the Church” - or the dream of Integralism accomplished - the nations are converted/discipled, and submitted to the social kingship of Christ. 2. The Great Apostasy: pretty self explanatory. A near total amount of Christians grow cold and fall away. The collapse of Christendom. 3. The Antichrist: He is revealed he deceives and he reigns. That’s three BUT the newer CCC includes the common teaching of.. 4. The “corporate conversion of the Jews” (the end of Rabbinic Judaism): It points to passages of scripture where it seems to say this will occur just before the end of the time and will trigger the second coming / general resurrection. AGAIN there is no official order, but the order listed is the probably the most common. But there are a few Catholics out there who mix those four up.
1. For all intents and purposes, the Gospel has been preached to every nation on earth. If not, I wonder which ethnic groups you consider completely untouched by the Gospel. 2. The conversion of the Jews doesn't precede the arrival of the Antichrist. According to the traditional understanding of "another comes in his name. Him you will receive" says the Jews will see the Antichrist as their long-awaited Messiah first. By the grace of God, they will recognize their mistake and then turn to Christ. I'm not saying now is the time, but it's hard to imagine a world more prone to deny the Truth than one that claims that men can be women and unions which call to heaven for blessing can be blessed inside Catholic churches!
@@erict.35 1. Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun would be surprised at the suggestion that Gospel has not yet reached China. 2. "I am come, &c, in my Father's name, as the Song of Solomon - sent by God the Father, that by His authority I may fulfill those things which He has promised to you that through Him there may be showered upon you the knowledge of God, grace, salvation, and eternal life. This I have clearly proved to you by many testimonies which the Father hath given me. Yet ye do not receive Me, but treat Me as a false prophet. Wherefore by the just judgement of God it shall come to pass that if another, who is really a false prophet, shall come to you, one who is not sent by God, but who shall come in his own name, i.e. in his own authority, falsely boasting himself to be the Messiah, such an one ye will receive. *Another therefore will be that Antichrist whom the Jews will receive,* though they rejected Christ. To this apply the words of Paul (2Thes.ii10) "Therefore God shall send upon them the working of error, that they may believe a lie, that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity." So SS. Chrysostom, Cyril, Augustine, and the ancient writers, passim. Again, another may mean any false prophet, pretending to be Christ, and therefore a forerunner of Antichrist, like that Egyptian, shortly after the time of Christ, who led thousands of men to destruction." - Cornelius a Lapide, commentary on John 5:43 (AD1637)
@@carissstewart3211 yeah, it reached the nation like 200 years ago and like .001% of the entire nation has been introduced to catholic religion. So… yeah.
@@erict.35 You're guilty of a categorical error here. I pointed out that the Gospel has been preached to every *nation* and asked which *ethnic groups* are as yet completely untouched. You're response is to point out that not every *individual* has heard the Gospel. What percentage of a given population must directly hear the Gospel from the Catholic Church in order to fulfill the prophecy? Bearing in mind that a general apostacy, such as the one we're living in now, is one of the signs of the End as well. The Catholic Church in China is small compared to the overall population (about 0.43% to 0.7% of a population of over a billion people is actually significant), but it is there. So... yeah.
@@carissstewart3211 guy, I’m not even arguing with you… I’m just amazed at how little people in China actually know anything about Catholic religion. If that’s what was meant by the sentence “Gospel will be preached to all nations,” then alright, I guess… But don’t be like: oh, that’s enough error or whatever.. like, cmon. Edit: how few people
Hey Brian ! Question: I am a convert, and because I was raised around many Protestant cultures, I am very familiar with the idea of a mass conversion of Jews to Christ as an important eschatological bullet point.... But even among Protestants this is not universal (pre millenial, etc etc etc).... When I converted, I was not sure what the Church's stance was, and even would have assumed it was less bold than you stated (since Catholicism tends to be fare more metaphorical with Revelation than many other Christian groups). Is there somewhere I can read official Church teaching on this mass conversion phenomena ? Thanks and respect +
The Catholic & Orthodox Churches are NOT more "metaphorical", and almost in all cases the literal interpretation must come 1st. But the visions in John are meant to be looked at differently that's all. The Protestant pagans don't even understand the literal meaning of Scripture, that is the point
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy I mean metaphorical on Genesis, the age of the Earth, literal talking snake, literally humans from dust (as opposed to 'theistic evolution') -- even things like Noah and the Flood, certain details of the Exodus -- many Catholic speakers are not going to demand that each and every detail is absolute history.
@@matthewbateman6487 🇷🇺☦️🤝✝️ Excuse me? What you said is blasphemy not Catholicism, so take it back!. Clearly you haven't read our Church fathers. Fyi It is called Origenism. 1. Genesis is clear that the age of the universe is 13,000 years (days of creation+human lineage) 2. Genesis is very clear that it was a literal snake - the 1st Snake which the Satan used as an agent to deceive Adam & Eve 3. Genesis is clear it is a literal flood & you don't even believe a basic thing like that?? 4. What details in Exodus? Shsme! Listen, your modernist Catholcism has already been condemned by Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors, so I suggest read it instead of being influenced by the heretical views of the "Thomistic" Institute. You Catholics need to learn the Hebrew to understand the text deeply. Take it back, brother.
@@matthewbateman6487 🇷🇺☦️🤝✝️ Excuse me? What you said is blasphemy not Catholicism, so take it back!. Clearly you haven't read our Church fathers. Fyi It is called Origenism. 1. Genesis is clear that the age of the universe is 13,000 years (days of creation+human lineage) 2. Genesis is very clear that it was a literal snake - the 1st Snake which the Satan used as an agent to deceive Adam & Eve 3. Genesis is clear it is a literal flood & you don't even believe a basic thing like that?? 4. What details in Exodus? Brother, everything in Bible's historical narrative must be taken literally! Listen, your modernist Catholcism has already been condemned by Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors, so I suggest read it instead of being influenced by the heretical views of the "Thomistic" Institute. You Catholics need to learn the Hebrew to understand the text deeply. Take it back, brother.
@brianholdsworth my only issue with this, I'd challenge the idea of the heresy of the antichrist as easy to identify. For why would anyone join the antichrist outright without being mislead?
YOU: For why would anyone join the antichrist outright without being mislead? *ME: According to Revelation 13, the AntiChrist* (a hom0sexual, Daniel 11:37) *will suffer a mortal wound on his head/arm -- but he lives anyway -- and those on earth say "who can make war with him ??" meaning that you can't kill him so how can you fight him.... then the False Shepherd/Prophet makes a statue of this AntiChrist and forces the world to take a "mark" on their head/hand that symbolizes that they worship the AntiChrist -- you will not be able to buy food, shelter, have a job, etc without this "mark" -- and eventually the False Shepherd/Prophet has everyone killed that will not convert and take the ""mark" of the AntiChrist* -- see this False Prophet's "church" described in Revelation 17:4-6. And THAT is why everyone will join the AntiChrist -- *and they will ALL be tormented in the Lake of Fire FOREVER* -- Revelation 14:9-11 -- *along with the AntiChrist, False Prophet and Satan* -- see Revelation 19:30, Revelation 20:10,14-15, Matthew 25:41,46, 2Thes 1:9, etc.
This is a bad pope. And his actions are breaking my heart. It shakes my faith in what the Church teaches about Her Magisterium. I converted because I saw the Catholic Church as being the True Fatih. The Fatih of the Church Fathers. This Pope contradicts the Fathers.
According to the warning of the Apostles, the church would have corrupted evil wolves in leadership teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles -- see Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc.
I don't get the "the Jews will all be converted first" part. Are we supposed to expect that EVERY SINGLE JEW will convert? The CCC says this: "The glorious Messiah's coming is suspended at every moment of history until his recognition by 'all Israel,' for 'a hardening has come upon part of Israel' in their 'unbelief' toward Jesus. [...] The 'full inclusion' of the Jews in the Messiah's salvation, in the wake of 'the full number of the Gentiles,' will enable the people of God to achieve 'the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ,' in which 'God may be all in all.'" My understanding is that all of Isreal is more of some collective declaration by Isreal (perhaps as a state) declaring that Jesus is the Messiah, not that every single Jew, especially every single ethnic Jew, will convert. That also just seems absurd. Are we really to believe that every single Jew on the planet will accept Jesus as the Messiah? Or that every single religious Jew accepts Jesus as the Messiah? HOW? God won't forcibly convert them, we know that for a fact, as he doesn't rape anyone's free will. Then why would every single Jew convert? I don't think this is what the CCC is actually teaching. Also, this is more of a question than the last one, but does this mean that no additional non-jew will convert after this declaration by Israel (or perhaps Jewish religious authorities or every single Jew)? Another question: if we come to the end times when, let's say, all Israel has converted and all religious Jews have converted, or whatever obvious sign comes that this step is fulfilled, then if even one non-jew truly accepts Jesus as his Lord and Savior after the fact, then would that disprove the Catholic Church? I guess what I'm asking is: is this infallible teaching? How about new-born babies that will be born in that period? Will people stop birthing babies starting from Israel's conversion through the antichrist's reign through the battle or Armageddon? This whole thing just doesn't make any sense...
The utter inability to reach obvious conclusions is one of the biggest problems of our time, Brian. Eg. Don't blame Vat2 for the current catastrophe in the church, safe and effective, trust the science, what is a woman? etc. Pachamama, same sex blessings, "climate change," reasonable hope all men saved, hell empty... the list is almost endless. While your advice about not jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions would be sound in any age, this video came across as somewhat predictable and, at best, naive. What exactly are you waiting for, Brianr? A figure in a big red cape with horns? (Another Sheen quote, by the way)
Brian said he found the quote on a sede site, although many others have it as well, and it does sound quite like the conciliar church: “[Satan] will set up a counterchurch which will be the ape of the [Catholic] Church. . . . It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content.”
I’m reading a good book about the mass atm, Federico Suarez.. seems some are clinging more to man made traditions and less to interior disposition and charity.
The world is crumbling around us and our souls are no longer safe even at church… this is so sad. Lord PLEASE take Francis ASAP and bring us a Catholic Pope.
@@catholicguy1073 I don’t think so. And the long term is looking good. We have shaken out most of the lgbt pedos it seems. And they have polled the younger priests as the most conservative in generations. Future looks bright.
We're seeing a lot of people signing up for Fishers Network, looking for help, looking for job opportunities, and wanting Catholic networking. We won't be able to respond to those needs if Catholic business leaders don't step up and lead. If you're an entrepreneur, business owner, executive, manager, academic administrator, or some other professional leader, consider forming a Fishers Network Crew now to respond to this urgent and vital need in the Church: fishersnetwork.com.
You should collect money for the victims of sexual abuse perpetrated by your filthy clergy.
I wish I was a businessman or leader in my profession because then I would join in a heatbeat. Our businessmen and professionals being networked in a Catholic society is extremely important. It may prove decisive one day.
Indeed, Catholic businessmen have nothing to lose and everything to gain by networking with one another and mentoring folks who wish to start new businesses. Only family can build a more loyal business network than this.
A true Christian cannot support lies and the pope is supporting climate change agenda which is a complete lie. Communists are faking it with the weather weapons. They will try to destroy the True Church of Jesus Christ with science--albeit fake science.
As a Freemason - I have seen a picture - and excommunicate Archbishop Fulton Sheen knew what "the plan" was. When the Freemason Antipope John XXIII started his "Vatican II Sect," with duped former Catholics he knew exactly what he was doing. So did the sacrilegious Freemason who put together the UNauthorized "Novus Ordo." So he plays with those whom he will dupe - and those who are duped consider him - posthumously - prophetic.
Brian, you’ve done a great job of explaining/clarifying where we are today. We need to keep that balance - be aware and never lose sight of the promises of God. Especially His promise about the gates of hell will not prevail against the church. Many times I’ve had to bring myself back from focusing on the moment and realize I keep trying to put God in a ‘box’. He is still sovereign. He is still the great I AM. What a comfort that He has and does continue to care so much for us that He has shared some things to be prepared. But our eyes MUST always stay firmly on Him!! Thank you, Brian. (I’m 80 yrs old and the journey is amazing!).
God bless you, truly. My grandmother reposed at 79 last year. A lot of us young people in the church have a similar story. Where our parents are not necessarily super committed to their beliefs, but that our grandparents are and they were the initial relatives who planted the seeds in us early on. My grandmother was devout and had a very personal relationship with our Lord. It inspires me every day. Grandparents are a blessing from God, and I loved mine dearly. And you're right. It's easy to get caught up in the current events in the church, but studying church history, we've been through much worse and made it out okay. We will make it out of this okay as well.
70 and right there with ya...
True! As the Psalmist says, proclaim the might deeds of Yahweh for He is faithful! Faith should have a better grip in us than fear and fear mongering. Faith has brought the church beyond the persecution of the early Christians to what it is now, through the blood of the saints. It is now our time to carry on the torch of faith and it starts with trusting Christ through His Church He built on Peter.
YOU: Especially His promise about the gates of hell will not prevail against the church.
*ME: Peter said that Jesus established a SPIRITUAL house comprised of Believers that are indwelled by the Holy Spirit* -- 1Peter 2:5-6 -- *the promises that Jesus made in Matthew 16:18-19 are for the "EKKLESIA/assembled BELIEVERS/the called out ones" that are part of this SPIRITUAL house -- part of Christ's SPIRITUAL Body.*
Jesus didn't make those promises to a PHYSICAL religious system with easily corrupted religious leaders as WARNED by the Apostles in. Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-6, etc
Beth, please read the books of Romans and Hebrews for yourself -- they are simple to understand -- ask the Holy Spirit to teach you Truth -- you will be AMAZED at the wonderful truth that is written there by the Apostle....
I think we (the Catholic Church) is in a very, very serious situation and I think the leaders in Rome need to go to Confession. It’s pretty bad when the the leaders promote people in serious sins to be bishops and cardinals while holy priests are canceled. I believe Jesus will protect the Church but the leaders in Rome seriously need to confess their lewd ideas.
@@drjanitor3747You can't know that.
@@Quekksilber yes , u can.
@@John-bf7ny It is God who knows the hearts of men, not some random guy on the internet.
Why are you surprised that church leadership are evil wolves teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles ?? *The Apostles WARNED you it would happen -- Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-6, etc*
I think what people need to realize is that, there have been FAR worse points in time in every regard compared to today. In terms of violence, corruption, disbelief, degeneracy. If you lived during the French revolution you’d think it was surely the apocalypse. Nothing is new under the sun.
The big difference now is that we don't have a Pope that will lead and care for us.
We are living under the French Revolution; this is the very fruit of what they intended.
@@carolynkimberly4021 imagine having a Borgia as Pope while the Turks are ransacking half of Christendom with mass forced conversion. Or with the Protestant wars. It’s been horrifically bad in the past.
But not world wide as it is today!
@@paulheiberger4977 : agree! In addition, the Vatican's 'fraternity' with the WEF and the Communists doesn't bode well for the protection of the sheep.
Nice! Ive been reading and rereading Communism and the Conscience of the West the past few years, and it's becoming one of my favorites. I'm happy to hear you namedrop it, because it's about so, so much more than communism and every Catholic should read it. I try to read a little bit of Fulton Sheen every day, and it really makes a difference when I remember. I truly believe the man had the gift of prophecy.
He didn't have the gift of prophecy -- he read the NT and found all of this stuff right there.
As a recent convert to the Catholic Faith, I get confused when I here other Catholics taking bad about the Pope or Vatican II. I appreciate your videos, they help me immensely. God bless you! Viva Christo Rey
In the final book in the Narnia series, by CS Lewis, the character who set up the deception of the fake Aslan, was - an ape.
Good catch on that.
Catholics stop with that CS Lewis that nobody & read the Saints instead
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy Read the saints and CS Lewis.(And I'm not Catholic actually, either but Orthodox)
@TheMOV13 Me too. I find it so wasteful & boring to waste time on fiction writers when we have hundreds of Saints to learn
@@TheMOV13 Me too. I find it so wasteful & boring to waste time on fiction writers when we have hundreds of Saints to learn
"...his religion will be a Brotherhood..." Sheen says, aka, the Masonic Fraternity, a Christless brotherhood of man. Those who know it's happening see it clearly while those who deny it's happening will never see it because it's already happening in front of them and they still don't see it.
February 10, 2021 (LifeSitenews) - For the second time in less than five months, the Gran Logia de España, Spain’s main masonic lodge, has expressed its profound satisfaction at Pope Francis’s involvement in the “Human Fraternity” initiative launched in Abu Dhabi on February 4, 2019. This time, the Spanish Freemasons published a long message welcoming the first ever International Day of Human Fraternity a few days ago, again on February 4, during which Pope Francis, together with Grand Imam Ahmad al-Tayyeb, bestowed an award for peace and fraternity on U.N. secretary general António Guterres in an online ceremony.
The whole freemasonry thing is a joke. Our problems do not stem from freemasons. Those guys in Spain are probably typical liberals so of course they love Pope Francis. Those who fixate on freemasons and other conspiracy theories are simply unable to comprehend the real world.
But did the Church ever become pro-Freemason? No, freemasonry is still considered grounds for excommunication iirc. Just because the Freemasons approve of something the Church does doesn’t mean that thing is bad
@@drjanitor3747 if gay people in the church is the only evidence for the Ape of the Church, then we're nowhere near. The Middle Ages had popes fathering children and holding massive orgies, things are nowhere near as bad today
Freemasonry demands that you become a man of God, and are active in your respective faith. The antichrist or ape of the Church won't come from the Masonic Lodge.
The Abu Dhabi declaration saying that God wills the plurality and diversity of all religions is a blatantly heretical statement. It’s such an offense to the cross of Christ.
I believe Blessed Ann Catherine Emmerich also identified a false church.
Yeah, we can see it described in Revelation 17:4-6.
The Ape of the Church is now clearly dominating the Holy Church with pride, self will and self love, justification and promoting mortal sin, errors, heresies, and lies which is contrary to the Truth, contrary to poverty; contrary to humilty, and gentleness; contrary to chastity; contrary to obedience of God's Will.
Absolutely agreed. Churchmen of the highest rank are calling evil good and good evil.
Love your videos and greatly appreciate them. Thank you
I don’t think we’re there yet, but inching closer and closer by the day
The church is just monkeying about at the moment
Bergoglio bears the mark of the beast in the digital lingua franca. Amoris Laetitia is much worse than fs.
@@drjanitor3747 Definitely have seen the wholesale conversion of the Jews? That's happened? They're all Christians over there in Israel now?
@@drjanitor3747 Jews as in Jewish people. Not necessarily religious. And it's the teaching of the Church.
A happy side note:
When in Mark and Matthew Jesus says only His Father knows the hour, he’s playing off a Jewish idiom from the 1st century…it’s what the groom would say about his wedding, because the father of the groom invited all the guests.
Or when He tells the disciples He is going to prepare a room for them…this was also a reference to preparation for the wedding.
Jesus thinks of the “end times” as preparations for the wedding banquet of the lamb (see Revelation 19).
Read “Jesus the Bridegroom by Dr. Brant Pitre and let Christian hope swallow anxiety.
Thank you for addressing this topic.
Fr. Kramer's explanation of the book of Apocalypse chapter 12:1-5
"Church suffers the keenest pangs passing at that time through the greatest crisis of her whole life. In that travail, she gives birth to some definite “person” who is to RULE the Church with a rod of iron (verse 5). It then points to a conflict waged within the Church to elect one who was to “rule all nations” in the manner clearly stated. In accord with the text this is unmistakably a PAPAL ELECTION, for only Christ and His Vicar have the divine right to rule ALL NATIONS. Furthermore, the Church does not travail in anguish at EVERY papal election which can be held without trouble or danger. But at this time the great powers may take a menacing attitude to hinder the election of the logical and expected candidate by threats of a general apostasy, assassination or imprisonment of this candidate if elected. This would suppose an extremely hostile mind in the governments of Europe towards the Church and would cause intense anguish to the Church, because an extended interregnum in the papacy is always disastrous and more so in a time of universal persecution. If Satan would contrive to hinder a papal election, the Church would suffer great travail.
…As a dragon, Satan through the evil world-powers of that time will enter the Church, interfere with her liberty and perhaps by stealthy suggestions having long before directed the choosing of candidates for the episcopate will now endeavor by threats of force to hinder the election of the worthiest candidate for the papacy."
(Herman Bernard Kramer, The Book of Destiny [TAN Books Reprint, 1975], pp. 277-279)
The Church has been eclipsed for 65 years.
Sensus Fidelium has some really good homilies explaining from the church fathers who the antichrist will be, the end times ect.
For example according to church fathers the Antichrist would not be a pope. He would be of Jewish descent from the tribe of Dan. He would rebuild the Jewish temple.
Sensus Fidelium is good some times, awful other times.
I really love that channel. However I do disagree with them on occasion
I've heard others say he will he Nero reincarnated (based on Revelations).
@@DRAGNFLYthere is no such thing as reincarnation. What? Will Nero have two bodies at the resurrection?
Yes, Thessalonians specifically says, the Antichrist will sit in the Temple of God. This is the Seat of Peter? In the Catholic Church. The Pope, sits in the seat of Peter, right?
Things are so tremendously confusing right now...good commentary Brian...
We now have a church under Rome, which promotes ecumenism over doctrine, and fraternity above the singularity of the Christ. Both place man's natural dignity above divine law. Certainly it can get worse, but what should we expect, rhat the ape of the Church suddenly pop into existence. that it won't retain some validity from percieved 'continuity' with the Apostolic Church, and by this deceivethe elect?
I fear we are so deep into this confusion we cannot see what is going on. Yet, Francis has made it very clear, for those willing to hear, that he has a deeply Protestant soteriology, and a very liberal form of Protestantism at that. He is a naturalist who puts human sensibility and 'inate sacred dignity' above every doctrine. This is in keeping with the evolutionary Christology of the assent of man that the mid century mods were so enamored with.
Though never overtly said, if you listen for Francis' assumptions, you hear his deep Modernism, that religion is a function of human creativity, and thus should serve the conscience of man as this is its source.
Is Francis the end of this inversion? Not likely, as he is not its beginning. But to assume the Roman church is still Christocentric from its highest seat, is to be blind to the cult of man it has been transforming into.
The Fathers of Vatican I and the subsequent Magisterium would shudder at your words. Rome cannot defect from the faith.
The true Church is never apart from Rome.
@@Quekksilber so is indefectibility a normative promise only, that whatever a bishop of Rome says is true even if he contradicts *directly* what previous popes said. Or is it the duty of a true pope to defend the Faith as delivered from the Apostles, and so we should see indefectibility as demonstrably true. That is interpreted without contradiction.
If the only infallible teaching of the Church is Papal infallibility, this doctrine is without foundation, for or Lord made many other declarations we must adhere to, not just the primary of the See of Peter.
If a man claiming to be Peter's successor teaches a foreign gospel, we must conclude then, that either the Holy Spirit is capricious regarding dogma and discipline, or that we have had false claims to the Chair of Peter.
The later is possible, the former is impossible.
@@williamthesamaritan I never made the claim that the only infallible teaching authority is the See of Peter. The infallible teaching authority of the Church is never without Peter.
We might also conclude that we are interpreting said successor in bad faith. This third one is also very much possible.
@@Quekksilber Of course this should be our first self check. But we are way past that with Francis. Reading someone in good faith who is in bad faith--regarding the duty of his office--is not virtuous.
@@williamthesamaritan I don't think judging the First See is spiritually healthy for oneself. Nobody judges the Holy Father, but Christ.
Keep hitting those nails on the head, Brian! You're one of the best voices out there on these matters.
I don’t know about “waiting for something good” but rather waiting for the awful pain of the present apostasy to be over…
Another great episode Brian. Yes the Jews haven't converted yet, I think that'll be the Rubicon event.
Great talk, needed to be said
It's funny that Fulton Sheen called it the "Ape of the Church"; an intelligent friend of mine suggested I learn more about the Scopes Monkey Trial. It seems to me the 8th of the church is actually exemplified perfectly in that trial: nobody in that trial wanted any Divine authority whatever. The Protestants who wanted prayer did not want it as handed down from the bishops. The atheists who wanted authority wanted the authority of men in lab coats, but again not of bishops on the matter of religion. And the media manifestly always wants a bloodbath.
Every controversy in the media that Catholics get harangued about has followed the exact same damn pattern. They portray the people who want god without a head and the people who want a head without God. But never the ones who think God's head can be known and followed.
I won't comment on the good or bad state of the Catholic church but I think the fact that Christendom as a whole is divided into so many factions is already bad enough. There has to be a way we can all come together. 🕊✌
YOU: There has to be a way we can all come together
*ME: Peter said that GOD's church was SPIRITUAL comprised of Believers who are indwelled by the Holy SPIRIT* -- see 1Peter 2:5-6 -- *true Believers are UNITED together because we are all indwelled by the SAME Holy Spirit* -- see 1Corinth 12:12-14.
PHYSICAL churches/denominations are all corrupted with wolfish leadership teaching some form of false doctrines -- *as WARNED by the Apostles in Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc.*
Another video wherein the commentator exchanges the hints of the coming end times’ scenario for the fact that it is not fully present. No, the ape of the church is not yet in full swing, but it is definitely taking shape before our eyes.
First the scripture says " If it were possible, the very elect would be fooled.."
It won't be possible for the elect to be fooled. So what makes us "elect" ?
Thank you! It certainly isn't waltzing through life like a fool who thinks he can't get fooled. I've looked at lines like that as responsibilities to live up to. It seems analagous to the many protestants I've met who sin and never confess or make amends even, and think "thank God I'm saved".
@@loulasher I know right , I take the story about " depart from me I never knew you seriously" ...I mean these people were convinced they were serving God , doing miracles in Jesus name , casting out demons ect ect.
So I'm not so " convinced" of my salvation.
I won't be until I hear those words " well done my good and faithful servant."
Dear Mr. Holdsworth. That is a snazzy vest. I wanted to alert you in case you weren't aware that it's not working well on camera because it's giving off moire patterns. It is quite distracting, especially when you move or fidget because it draws even more attention to it. Thanks for your content.
Very Good and funny thumbnail Brain , God bless you brothers in Christ and your family, freinds and ministies may you have a blessed day!
Glad to see you pump the breaks on dissentish content.
Great video, more like it
Thank you, Brian, this was very helpful to me
I believe it is equally dangerous to suggest that the faithful blindly accept the pronouncements of a man who sits in Peter's chair. The erosion of faith will likely not occur in an instant, but rather one step at a time.
The erosion of the Faith certainly began in earnest at Vat II. The modernist/Masonic/Communist cabal had grown in numbers of prelates, and forcefully seized the council. From then on, we have been witnessing the 'rotten fruits' of the council.
So, you're Protestant...?
Super helpful Brian, I struggle with this stuff particularly around Fatima and the many Marion apparitions where she speaks about apostasy from the top… have you read Windswept House by Fr Malachi Martin?
Malachi Martin was a conman who had to be thrown out of his order for having multiple affairs with married women. He got thrown out, then had to make money so he began writing fiction, something that compulsive liars are very good at. He has a long string of lies that have been found out about him. He writes good ghost stories and conspiracy novels, but that is about it. None of it has any connection to the truth. But he made a lot of money with those stories.
@@tomthx5804 is there any evidence supporting your claims? Who said that? Where is it written?
Wherever the true Church is-it is never apart from Rome.
Indeed! Faith in Christ is to trust the Church He established to have a teaching authority, Holy Scripture and Sacred Traditions in a congregation of the faithfuls. The focal point of the Body of Christ, the Bride of Christ that guides us to Him so that we may not be lost. The church is the boat we ride with Christ towards our conversion to be humble sons and daughters of God worthy to be with Him in His kingdom. Christ is with us to calm the wind, the seas and the storm in this journey with the church and must not let fear and anxiety take hold of us, lest we think that the boat we are in with Christ is sinking. When that happens within us, that is where the church of the apes will take hold. That is what the devil wants. That he relentlessly attacks the bride of Christ so that the church of the apes will grow within us with Satan dragging us away from Christ and His church.
Antichrist will be the apparent solution to problems... We're not at Antichrist stage, we're still at the start of the problems stage. Can't offer a solution until the problems and the reaction.
YOU: we're still at the start of the problems stage
*ME: No. For those that have actually read the book of The Revelation and other Bible prophetic books -- we are on the EDGE and will tumble over at any moment.* But even history books about the Great Empires (Greek, Rome, etc) show that one of the LAST things to happen before the Empire crumbles, is the general acceptance of hom0sexuality. We're about to plummet .....
Thanks as always Brian for a well delivered and poignant message.
pray for Israel pray for Jews, pray for the peace of Jerusalem....this is a great point by the speaker here; Jesus can come when ever the Father has planned...but yes pray for Israel to enter the Church in large numbers.
Israel does not have to "enter the Church" -- *according to the Apostle Paul in Romans 11:25-32, there is coming a point in Time when GOD is FINISHED/completed gathering in the gentiles* -- most Christians see this as the harpazo/rapture of the believers mentioned in 1Thes 3:14-18 -- *and when this happens, GOD will turn His attention to saving the JEWS.* End time prophecy in the book of The Revelation is for the JEWS -- see Rev 7, Rev 12, Rev 15:3, etc -- it is the Jew's tribulation or Jacob's Trouble mentioned in Jeremiah 30:7,11.
@@veritasmuy2407 Catholic doctrine 1. Gospel will be heard spread to most/all includes 2/ Israel and Jews in large number entering Church 3 a time of peace 4 a falling away 5 a persecution of a remnant Church then the 2nd coming
@@jrimmer4987 LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. *According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc* -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- *its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble* -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- *there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews* -- see Revelation 11 -- *and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help* -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- *which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon)* -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- *Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS* (Matthew 2:2) *returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years* (Revelation 19) -- *then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire* -- see Revelation 20.
*This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire* -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- *and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD* -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- *and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies* -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc
*If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John* -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews -- see Revelation 11 -- and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon) -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS (Matthew 2:2) returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years (Revelation 19) -- then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire -- see Revelation 20.
This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc
If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
LOL That is NOT what the Bible teaches -- the end time Jews will not enter the Church. According to Apostles, the believers/bride will be "harpazo'd/raptured/taken by force, snatched" up to GOD -- the the False Church will align with the evil Global AntiChrist and persecute the JEWS/Israel by forcing them to worship an idol and take a "mark" in order to buy food, own homes, have a job, etc -- see Revelation 13, Matthew 24:15-16,21 -- its called JACOB's Trouble, not the Church's trouble -- Jeremiah 30:7,11 -- there will be TWO WITNESSES in Jerusalem preaching to the Jews -- see Revelation 11 -- and the Jews will BELIEVE in their Messiah Jesus and cry out for his help -- see Matthew 23:39, Hosea 5:15 -- which will usher in the SECOND Coming of Jewish Messiah Jesus TO ISRAEL -- to rescue Israel from the war that the AntiChrist/Satan are pushing on ISRAEL (Armageddon) -- see Rev 12:17, Rev 16:16 -- Jewish Messiah Jesus/King of the JEWS (Matthew 2:2) returns and destroys the enemies of physical ISRAEL -- the False Prophet and AntiChrist are thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and Satan is thrown into the Bottomless Pit for 1000 years (Revelation 19) -- then KING JESUS reigns on his father King David's Jewish throne in Jerusalem on earth for 1000 years -- Satan is released after 1000 years and stirs the nations against Jesus and ISRAEL -- so GOD Himself sends fire from Heaven to destroy the armies and then Satan is thrown into the Lake of Fire -- and all those unbelievers and wicked in HELL will also be judged and thrown into the Lake of Fire -- see Revelation 20.
This entire physical universe will be destroyed by intense fire -- see 2Peter 3:10-13 -- and a NEW heaven (no sun or moon) and a NEW earth (no seas) will be created by GOD -- see Rev 21:1-3, 23, Rev 22:5 -- and THEN the Bride/Believers waiting in Heavenly Jerusalem, will descend to this New Earth with our incorruptible bodies -- see Rev 21:9-10, etc
If your Roman Catholic Church have changed these words of the Apostle John as written in the book of The Revelation and added a "new ending", then your church leadership are cursed according to Apostle John -- see Revelation 22:18-19.
Brian, your understanding about the protection of Christ for the church, opens you to a massive blow upon your shield of faith!
The Katechon teaching will help you see the trajectory, for the Vatican.
and simply put, its nothing good..........
His dogmatic understanding? Are you Protestant?
I don't understand how you can believe that the Vatican will somehow seat the Antichrist, and simultaneously think that this doesn't make Christ a liar saying that he will build His indefectible Church on Peter as the Rock.
The true Church is never apart from Rome and Peter.
@@Quekksilber For 67 years the popes were in Avignon, France.
I didn't mention anything about the anti christ but, I will address your last comment.
That misunderstanding is going to cause you a problem.....Rome will Burn!
Look at the Katechon, principle it will help you in the time ahead. - cheers @@Quekksilber
@@littlerock5256 But the Popes were still the Bishop of Rome. This is what is meant by "never apart from Rome".
Saint Alphonsus Ma. Liguori teaches in his book “La Messa e l'Officio strapazzati, ovvero Avvertimenti a' sacerdoti” (1822) that before the coming of the Antichrist the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass will be abolished/prohibited for 1290 days…
BRILLIANT!!!!!THANKS BRIAN👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I belueve C S Lewis also referred to the Ape of the Church . His last Narnia book depicted an ape carrying out the commands of evil masters .
The Last Battle is worthwhile reading for any Christian, it has a lot to say about heaven and hell and the final things. The other Narnia books are also quite prophetic.
@@philiphumphrey1548 I found them wonderful.
Tolkien? CS Lewis?? How about stop with those pretentious western fiction writers who are also chewed up cliches & start reading Saints & Church fathers 🤦
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxyThere are many roads that lead to Rome, Tolkien and Lewis were geniuses in their own way, mostly on telling stories, but also on a philosophical level. Some people understand better from church fathers or Thomas Aquinas, and some more from Tolkien or Lewis
@@jeannebouwman1970 Brother, no they are not, they are pagan fiction writers. Read the Ecumenical Councils, which clearly state that entertainment is incompatible with Christian life. Also many of Aquinas' speculations were unbiblical un-church fathers & heretical, which lead the Catholic Church to Modalism.
Faith in Christ is to trust the Church He established to have a teaching authority, Holy Scripture and Sacred Traditions in a congregation of the faithfuls. The focal point of the Body of Christ, the Bride of Christ that guides us to Him so that we may not be lost. The church is the boat we ride with Christ towards our conversion to be humble sons and daughters of God worthy to be with Him in His kingdom. Christ is with us to calm the wind, the seas and the storm in this journey with the church and we must not let fear and anxiety take hold of us, lest we might think that the boat we are in with Christ is sinking. When that happens within us, that is where the church of the apes will take hold and what the devil wants. That is why he relentlessly attacks the bride of Christ so that the church of the apes will grow within us to drag us away from Christ and His church.
While it is necessary to observe what is happening within the church now, it's also important to reflect on which OT/NT prophecies have yet to be fulfilled. Of concern to me is the movement towards and acceptance of one world religion and digital currency (implantation of financial digital chips, already being used in humans to purchase items). Forced implementation of central bank digital currency (cashless society), is in my view, a precursor to the fulfilment of the mark of the beast.
The Mark of the Beast is more likely something like a Creed. The imagery of the forehead and the right hand is already known since Deuteronomy where God says "Hear o Israel, The Lord is One..."
God tells Israel to keep these words on their right hand and their forehead meaning that our mind and actions should be permeated by the Commandments of God and His Revelation.
Heresy is a denial of grace every time. Denial of Mary who is ‘full of grace.’ And so on…
*Heresy is to contradict the Apostles/New Testament.* It is not a denial of grace.
For example: *The Apostle taught that Satan was crushed/defeated by ONE MAN/Jesus dying on the wooden cross -- see Hebrews 2:14* -- the SEED of Israel (Isaiah 65:9) has ALREADY crushed Satan's head/power (Genesis 3:15) -- *so to teach that Mary crushes Satan* (no Biblical verses) *is heresy that contradicts the Apostle/Original Church that wrote the NT for us.*
Always good to keep perspective and not go off half cocked. However, I think as to the conversion of the Jews I think it held that many will be converted at the preaching of Enoch and Elias during the great tribulation. Thus that would be DURING the time of the antichrist. That being said, even in light of great apostacy , we are likely not yet in the full reign of the antichrist and the Church is not wholly compromised.
Who said that about Enoch?
@@erict.35 early Church fathers I think at least according to Fr Cornelius a Lapidae
I really think the comment on “The Catholic Church protecting Jews” is entirely incorrect.
6:01
I really don't like the idea, that the church feels it is necessary for God's plan to succeed, that they personally take political action. It's like hearing a Christian say that it is necessary to maintain the modern nation-state of Israel in its present form (and I am not going to argue one way or another on that particular topic). As if allowing it to change or dissolve would ruin God's plan for all time. As if God cannot fulfill his plan without our help, and as if there can be no future state of Israel as disconnected from the modern state as the modern state is from the ancient state.
God doesn't need our help to keep the world's jews alive so they can convert and fulfill prophecy. What jews there are at that future date will acknowledge Christ as king, regardless of how many there are and regardless of our acts to preserve or destroy them. The collective power and will of all of mankind does not have the strength to "prevent the second coming from happening." That would be absurd.
The thumbnail 😂
Being child like in faith is important I think as per Jesus. As they only look at the facts. We get confused and wrong when we have a lot to loose and will diminish our ability to judge and come to a conclusion. Only a childlike has the capacity to say that the King is naked. For many it’s weighing how much are we to loose if we say anything. Even at Jesus’ time only simple people understood to true identity of Jesus.
For a child like person it’s crystal clear what’s happening at the top of the church. And the current pontiff is the perfect candidate to be an antichrist as he works against the teachings of Christ. In the past saints never had anything to loose other than Christ, so they only wanted Christ and stood for Christ. Not for the world.
For a child like person it would be perfectly clear that no Pontiff can ever be the seat of the Antichrist, as that would instantly make Christ a liar. Even to say that he works against the teachings of Christ...
*And on this rock I will build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail it.*
"The words - and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it - proclaim and establish the authority of which we speak. "What is the it?" (writes Origen). "Is it the rock upon which Christ builds the Church or the Church? The expression indeed is ambiguous, as if the rock and the Church were one and the same. I indeed think that this is so, and that neither against the rock upon which Christ builds His Church nor against the Church shall the gates of Hell prevail" (Origenes, Comment. in Matt., tom. xii., n. ii). The meaning of this divine utterance is, that, notwithstanding the wiles and intrigues which they bring to bear against the Church, it can never be that the church committed to the care of Peter shall succumb or in any wise fail. "For the Church, as the edifice of Christ who has wisely built 'His house upon a rock,' cannot be conquered by the gates of Hell, which may prevail over any man who shall be off the rock and outside the Church, but shall be powerless against it" (Ibid.). Therefore God confided His Church to Peter so that he might safely guard it with his unconquerable power."
"Wherefore, as appears from what has been said, Christ instituted in the Church a living, authoritative and permanent Magisterium, which by His own power He strengthened, by the Spirit of truth He taught, and by miracles confirmed. He willed and ordered, under the gravest penalties, that its teachings should be received as if they were His own."
Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cogitum
@@Quekksilber sorry, didn’t read your full comment. I think you misread me. If you read me correctly, I said ‘an Antichrist’ in a way where someone is against the teachings of Christ(1 John 2-18) It’s not up to me to judge whether he’s ‘The Antichrist’ who’s to come in the end days.
@@linopaul It doesn't matter whether it is an or The. The pope can never be the Antichrist or even prepare his way. That would totally falsify Catholicism.
@@Quekksilber Also, can someone explain to me, how I make Christ a liar, If I say the current Pope works against the teachings of Christ ?
@@linopaul Christ said that on this Rock he will build the Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it. He also said that a house that is divided in itself cannot last. Communion with the Holy See is the principle of unity for Christ's Church, as He governs it through Peter and his successors. The head cannot work against the body.
If Sheen is right and we are in this era Then Bishop Sheen fell victim to this ape of the church. We have to remember that he witnessed the 2nd Vatican Council and didn't oppose it. So he was duped as well.
That simply means that the Second Vatican Council didn't establish an Ape of the Church. Where are you people getting your information from??
I have to feel lucky that I was born after that time, because the hope for progress in the world was so great, in spite of the cold war and degradation of morals and ridiculous developments in art, that very nearly everyone seems to have been swept up in it. I had a chemistry professor who believed the old slogan "better living through chemistry" which goes along with the idea that between science and engineering we could solve any problem. That it ignored we created most of the problems we would supposedly solve was easy to ignore. I mean it, I would probably have bough it all hook, line, and sinker.
Cardinal Newman says virtually the same thing in a famous Anglican sermon.
Brother Brian, from whence is your authority to preach-teach to other Catholics? What is your Jurisdiction as per the Catholic precept of permission to preach-teach? Clergy and Religious are required by Canon Law and Ecclesiastic Tradition to proclaim the Gospel to the Faithful, by God. What makes you exempt to teach to the Faithful? What of your fallibility and its consequent error that you are bound to pontificate? Pax Christi in regno Christi
YOU: Clergy and Religious are required by Canon Law and Ecclesiastic Tradition to proclaim the Gospel to the Faithful, by God.
*ME: Actually, the Apostles WARNED us that evil wolves would be in church leadership teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles* -- see Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc. *Soooo.... the clergy can be EVIL and teach false doctrines -- the Apostle says that it is MORE NOBLE to search Scripture for yourself to make sure that what you are being taught aligns with GOD's holy Scripture. -- Acts 17:11,* 2Timothy 3:15-17, etc
YOU: What of your fallibility and its consequent error that you are bound to pontificate?
*ME: Jesus said that God's people were NOT to call some sinful man on earth their spiritual "pope/papa/father" who claims to be the one with God's infallible truth -- see Matthew 23:9* (1John 2:27). *JESUS also said that God's people are NOT to have one man acting as a "lord/boss" with authority over the people of GOD because that is the system of authority of the pagan gentile kingdoms -- see Matthew 20:25-26* (1Peter 5:3)
Anti-Christ, in the greek usage of the term originally, means more 'instead of Christ' rather than 'opposed to Christ'.
All has been revealed and unfolding in the message of Fatima, Akita, LaSalette and Garabandal.
I don't know when the next conclave will be but I hope Cardinal Dr. Zaius wins.
Fernandez will be the next pope. I'd put money on it.
Good thumbnail 👌
I love the picture of the monkeys in miters 😂In fact, "Monkeys in Miters" would be a solid band name
I was in a band briefly that was even more briefly called Nuns With Hammers, after the "Plowshares" group that would go onto military bases with hammers and try refashioning modern weaponry and vehicles into farming tools. I don't know how they got on bases, but they didn't get very far before being arrested, which was the real end the expected of their protests.
3 Aves for your intentions 🌹🌹🌹🙏🏻✝️
What we need is an real Catholic pope. I think that will happen.
Slowly but surely you're moving towards schism, Brian. It's a sad sight to see. Praying for you that you are not yet too far down that path to turn around again and come back.
By saying that the current situation is not the ape of the church... That is sending him on the past to schism? I don't understand what you're meaning.
@@adamrad2220he doesn’t understand it either, he’s been poisoned by Michael Lofton. These guys are easy to pick out
@Brian I need a clarification on the criteria you mentioned wrt the chronology of great deception. As far as I can tell, the two things are the gospel having reached everyone in the world, and the Jews being converted, regrafted, gathered in etc... But not everyone gentile and jew being converted. Am I wrong in my understanding?
Two sides of the same coin the Hyperpapalist (neo-modernist) and the Sedevacantist both deeply misunderstand the historical role of the papacy and the strict limits of infabillity structured by Vatican 1.
Pray for them.
Where is the unity of FAITH (the CATHOLIC! faith) of this Conciliar Church, when the vast majority of so called Catholics do not even believe in the Eucharist and a hierarchy that has no problem with the errors of V2, even promoting it?
Sorry to see this channel taking a loftonesque turn. Getting all false spirit of Vatican 1 / hyper papalist
Where does it say the Jews will all be converted first ?
I am curious about this as well
The Vatican II sect teaches that Jews don't need conversion. The counter church is here.
Para. 674, CCC.
@@BrianHoldsworth thanks I'm on it now 👍
@@BrianHoldsworth That's a difficult one. 🤔 I'll have to look into it more.
To see a conversion of the Jews as a religion I can see. But "all" Jews is difficult to understand.
It's abvious not all gentiles will be converted.
So we have the "full inclusion " of Jews coming after the " full number of the Gentiles"
I would pray that all would come to Christ and His Church , yet that seems doubtful 🤔
I will contemplate this more . Thank You for responding.
Two things:
1- can anything that humans do in this world prevent God from doing something that He wishes to do? Can any human action really prevent the Second Coming? Especially something as crude as killing all Jews? Maybe God will be so disgusted that He chooses not to come again, but that is something different.
2- Of course precious little is known about the Endtime. I think trying to read the signs and predicting this is a fool's game. But if the Ape of the Church is Christianity in reverse, it will not be the Church but only less orthodox and less traditional than we like to see. It will be something totally different. I guess no people in mitres and ritual robes, more like a state ideology. Or something more diffuse, without a clear and rigorous theoretical base. The more diffuse, the harder to pin it down on anything and the harder to fight it. There will always a lot of projection in this, but I envision more like a left-liberal utopia in which religion at all might be tolerated, but is totally marginalised.
approx 4:41 -- shouldn't the remedy be to read the NT so that we can plainly see when a current teaching is false ?? Acts 17:11
There have been plenty of apocalyptic times in the history of the Church. Like when the Arians nearly took over, or during the black death, or when armies of Islam arrived at the gates of Vienna at the same time that Luther was tearing the Church apart. These storms all passed. So it's important not to automatically assume that the present storm or the next one is the final tribulation, it may be or it may not. All you have to do is stay faithful, watch and pray.
It's completely different because in these cases the enemies were external, on this case the enemies are internal. So, even if Brian is right, this could be the first step for the destruction of the church.
@@germankoster4910Were the Arians not internal? Or the priest turned heretic Luther?
@@sinksnake7031was Luther the pope?
@@generic_account2138 No, but Pope Alexander VI was and he was a really bad pope too. That also has nothing to do with what the other guy said. God bless you.
You better believe it!
Ape, Catholic or Protestant vs Christ’s true church:
Friends, let’s examine how the Apostle views Christ’s true church:
1 Cor 12:4-31!
According to Paul:
Church members are joined to “Christ” not a particular religion! How are they joined to Him?
1 Cor 12:12-13, 1 Cor 6:17.
All believers that are joined to Christ’s church must receive Spirit baptism!
Acts 9:17-18, Acts 10:42-48, Mk 1:8!
Paul explains how Spirit baptism that joins one spiritually to Christ is then manifested in the natural or physical church?
1 Cor 12:7!
All believers once joined to Christ by His Spirit receive gifts?
1 Cor 12:4-11!
Spiritual gifts are allocated to each member based on God's wisdom, not man’s, for the good of reaching the lost and nurturing the growth of God's flock!
1 Cor 12:4-31!
I suspect that many reading this have been led to believe that their church is the true church; yet, they have never been taught how God defines His church: as a living body, established through Spirit baptism, and empowered in its mission by bestowing spiritual gifts to its members.
P.S. The impetus of the true Church is God’s Spirit living in each member, being manifested in the world, and nothing else!
In the second part of the Fatima secret, the Madonna foretold: "The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be destroyed. Finally, My Immaculate Heart will triumph."
In a text published in 2009 where anthropologists, largely non-Catholic and even non-believers, discuss the social relevance of Marian apparitions, the role of Brazilian Catholic thinker Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira (1908-1995) as an "untiring promoter of devotion to Fatima" is mentioned. Some critics have wanted to see in Corrêa de Oliveira's interpretation of the Fatima message, foreseeing a period of convulsive crisis called "bagarre" - where indeed "the good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be destroyed" - followed by a Reign of Mary particularly favorable to the Church, where "finally, My Immaculate Heart will triumph," a sort of Catholic version of Protestant millenarianism. The criticism is unfounded. Not only does Corrêa de Oliveira not predict a specific date for these events - which often appears, though not always, in millenarianism - but also, the two crucial elements of the classic Protestant millenarian schema are absent: a visible coming - but "intermediate" compared to the "final" one at the end of the world - of Jesus to the Earth and the disappearance for a thousand years of evil and evildoers. On the contrary, for the Brazilian thinker, representative of the counter-revolutionary school that uses the term "Revolution" to designate the process of de-Christianization that characterized the West since the Renaissance, "the Revolution will continue - and I am sure of this - even in the Reign of Mary. Revolutionary cells will continue to exist and will be even worse than those of today. It seems impossible, but it will be so. Because the rejection of the graces offered in the Reign of Mary will make men worse than they are today."
Pope Benedict XVI, when he repeated that the Church took the message of Fatima extremely seriously, was not far from the perspective of tragedies even worse than those humanity had already gone through - in the language of Corrêa de Oliveira, a "bagarre": "It would be an illusion to think that the prophetic mission of Fatima is concluded. [...] Man has been able to unleash a cycle of death and terror, but he cannot interrupt it..." It would have been certainly wrong to attribute to the Pope speculative - truly millenarian - notions about the "when" of the "triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary." His words were not a prediction but a wish introduced by a "may." But even though we do not know the "when," this "triumph" - which Corrêa de Oliveira, following the great French Marian saint so dear to Pope John Paul II, St. Louis de Montfort (1673-1716), called precisely the "Reign of Mary" - is certain because it is "announced" not by the speculations of men but by the voice of the Madonna herself that the Church, in the person of the Pope, welcomed and made her own.
The West - here Pope Benedict XVI resumed the great theme of Pope John Paul II of the "new evangelization" - has become, with the crisis of faith, a mission territory: "The field of ad gentes mission appears considerably expanded today and not definable solely based on geographical considerations." And from Portugal, the Pope "[...] repeats to each of you: My brothers and sisters, you must become witnesses with me to the resurrection of Jesus. In fact, if you will not be his witnesses in your environment, who will be in your place?". "In Sacred Scripture, it often appears that God is in search of the righteous to save the city of men, and he does the same here, in Fatima, when the Madonna asks: 'Do you want to offer yourselves to God to endure all the sufferings that He will send you, in an act of reparation for the sins with which He is offended, and in supplication for the conversion of sinners?' (Memoirs of Sister Lucia, I, 162)." The yes of the visionaries will be the first stone for the construction of the kingdom of the Immaculate Heart of Mary only if we know how to accompany it with our yes, day by day.
YOU: the social relevance of Marian apparitions
*ME: The "vision of light" at FATIMA that called itself "Mary", was satanic* (see 2Corinth 11:14) -- *it even did the same satanic miracle that the evil AntiChrist will do in Revelation 13:13-14* -- made a ball of fire come down from heaven to earth in the sight of men, and DECEIVED those dwelling on the earth by that miracle.
Satan knows the Bible far better than YOU do -- he's well aware of the end time horrendous prophecies -- just because he comes to you as a vision of light and tells you what the Bible says, doesn't mean its really Mary being prophetic. Sheeeeesh
@@veritasmuy2407
As is known, Protestant brethren do not worship Mary.
(It's not strange that those who don't have the Church, Zion, Mary as Mother aren't orphaned? Yet, you are a brother!)
The reason for not venerating the Madonna is based on the fact that according to Luther, man, after original sin, is deeply corrupted, and the grace of God does not transform him internally. In other words, it does not make him go from sinner to saint, from unjust to just.
And even the Madonna would find herself in the same condition as sinners.
Mary would have been only the channel through which God used to come into the world. But otherwise, she would also be part of sinful humanity.
Protestants recognize the virginity of Mary in the conception of Jesus, but not her virginity during and after childbirth. And primarily because for them, the only source of Revelation is Sacred Scripture.
According to Catholics and Orthodox, Sacred Scripture must be read in the light of Tradition, which complements it and guarantees its authentic interpretation.
Undoubtedly, at the center of Christian life is Our Lord, the Way, the Truth, and the Life (Jn 14:6).
Christian life essentially consists of encountering Christ, welcoming Him, being grafted into Him, and in Him possessing God, who is eternal Life.
But just as corruption entered the world through the sin of Adam and Eve, so redemption passes-precisely because the Lord willed it-through the new Adam, who is Christ, and the new Eve, who is Mary, the highest image and expression of the Church.
The Madonna is undoubtedly not on the same level as the Lord because she herself was wondrously redeemed by her Son.
But Jesus Himself wanted her by His side.
He wanted to be introduced into the world by her.
He wanted to be introduced into public life by her in Cana of Galilee.
On the cross, He entrusted her to us as Mother in the order of grace.
And on Pentecost, we see her among the Apostles and other people in the Upper Room. Her presence, however, is noted in a singular way: "All these were persevering with one mind in prayer, together with some women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and His brothers" (Acts 1:14).
Therefore, the Madonna, as she has a special role in the life of Christ, also has it towards the Church.
Not because we establish it, but because Our Lord wanted it.
Christocentrism-rightly referenced by you-is not in opposition to devotion to the Madonna.
On the contrary, turning to Mary is the shortest, most beautiful, and most fruitful way to reach our Lord, to holiness.
Mary, in fact, is entirely Christ-centered.
Indeed, she is the most successful Christocentrism.
The Lord Himself places it in our hands to make it our own.
We entrust ourselves to Mary.
To filially entrust oneself to the blessed Virgin is not an exceptional and unexpected act for the family of Jesus' disciples. It is rather rediscovering a familiarity with the Mother of God and surrendering to her affectionate care for us, which are feelings of always; it is even rediscovering a fundamental aspect of our original identity as living members of Christ.
We were entrusted to Mary the very moment we were born as a redeemed people by the blood of the Lord. From the heights of the cross, the Only Begotten Son of God with salvation and new life gave us a mother: "Behold, your mother!" He said to us.
That woman, who witnessed agonizing but unweakened the agony of her Son and the frustration of every earthly expectation, has become the reason and source of our hope. That spirited creature, pierced in soul (cf. Lk 2:35) and wounded in heart, has become the cause of our joy. Her immaculate fidelity, which led her to Calvary and intimately associated her with the sacrifice that renewed the universe, remains the support of our faith and our decision to live according to the Gospel.
At the foot of the cross, we became simultaneously the property of Christ the Savior and children of His beloved mother. The tenacious bond that connects us to her thus arises with the very origin of our condition as Christians.
We entrust to her our children, so that they may encounter Christ, the sense and center of existence, and so that their youth may not be lost pursuing myths without truth and false joys.
We entrust the suffering, the sick, the poor, who are still among us and await every day from everyone a little fraternity.
We entrust the fate of our society, so that work may not be lacking for anyone, so that we never forget to live together in serenity and mutual respect, so that no one is ever denied the right to express themselves in real freedom, so that violence does not prevail, so that the culture of life is affirmed, so that the longing of men for peace is not disappointed.
We all entrust ourselves to Mary, with our hopes and fears, with our yearnings for good and our inner defeats, with our intentions and our pains. Today, the Mother-who was given to us by a Crucified One-welcomes us all and reassures us.
At a certain point, you will find (and it is a singular grace) that there is no better way to meet Christ and unite with Him than with Mary, a present, maternal, and living presence in the marvelous communion of the Saints in which Christ has inserted us.
Christ has given the Madonna as Mother to each of us in the order of grace, and He has also given her to us as Mother of the Church.
Is it not appropriate for the Mother to make her presence felt even through Apparitions?
In any case, God has decided so.
Marian apparitions serve precisely to remind and explain Divine Revelation. They add nothing to it.
Does it seem sensible to say that the apparitions of the Madonna at Fatima are all works of the devil?
Evangelicals, like all Protestants, have a fundamental fault. And it is to explain Scripture according to private interpretation contrary to what Scripture itself says they have received from the Church: "First of all, you must understand this: no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by human will, but men and women moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God" (2 Peter 1:20-21).
By doing so, they not only deprive believers of the right understanding of Sacred Scriptures but also of many precious goods, such as the intercession of Mary and the Saints, against the clear teaching of the Scriptures themselves.
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: As is known, Protestant brethren do not worship Mary.
*ME: Neither did the Original Church that KNEW Mary -- please find one verse written in the NT by the guys that KNEW Mary that says:* Mary was sinless, Mary was immaculately conceived, Mary is the mediator between Believers and Jesus, Mary is the mother of all believers, Mary crushes Satan, Mary is co-Redemptrix, Jesus is the SEED of Mary, etc....... *NONE. Because ALL of the above ADDED false traditions about Mary CONTRADICT the Original Church/New Testament.*
For example:
Rome teaches that Mary is the mediator between Believers and Jesus -- *which contradicts the Apostle in John 14:13-14,23 which states that Believers are to go DIRECTLY TO JESUS with our prayers/requests.*
Rome teaches that Mary crushes Satan -- *which contradicts the Apostle in Hebrews 2:14 which states that Satan was crushed/defeated by ONE MAN/Jesus dying on the wooden cross.*
Rome teaches that Mary is the mother of all believers -- *which contradicts JESUS in John 19:25-27 and Matthew 12:46-50.* NOTICE that in Matthew 12:46-50 that Jesus did NOT say that believers were his brothers and sisters and Mary was the "mother" of all ???? WHO does Jesus say is his true "mother" in the Kingdom of GOD ???
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: fundamental fault. And it is to explain Scripture according to private interpretation contrary to what Scripture itself
*ME: You mean like how Rome privately interprets John 19:25-27 and says it is Jesus making Mary the mother of ALL believers ?? Don't ignore verse 25, Did Jesus tell ALL of the believers at the foot of his cross that Mary was THEIR mother ??* No. Jesus selected ONE believer (John) out of the group of believers and told that ONE believer to take care of Mary's physical needs as he would his own mother, and from that hour that ONE believer took Mary to his own private home/property.
*John NEVER referred to himself as "John" in any of his writings -- he always referred to himself as some form of "the disciple whom Jesus loved"* -- see John 13:23, John 20:2, John 21:7, John 21:20, etc. So John is talking about ONLY John in John 19:25-27 -- John isn't talking about YOU.
*Just like you can NOT insert yourself into John 13:23, you also can NOT insert yourself into John 19:25-27.*
Heresy and false private interpretations come from Rome.
@@PaoloGasparini-ux2kp YOU: And primarily because for them, the only source of Revelation is Sacred Scripture
*ME: Because Jesus was all about Sola Scriptura. Jesus said to SEARCH the Scripture (John 5:39).* Jesus said that he FULFILLED Scripture (Luke 24:44). *Jesus said that God's people ERRED because they did not know Scripture (Matthew 22:29).* Jesus used God's written Scripture to CORRECT the false doctrines of God's religious leaders (Matthew 19:4-6), *Jesus rejected and disobeyed the ADDED traditions of God's religious leaders (Matthew 15:1-9).* Jesus even used written Scripture to defeat the temptations of Satan in Matthew 4 ("it is written")
*Shouldn't CHRISTians be like Christ ???*
Paul says YES !! (Acts 17:11, 2Tim 3:15-17
Rome says NO !!
ROME says that GOD's people do not need to search/know Scripture, just know Rome's Catechism (opinions, interpretations). ROME says that Scripture can not correct Rome's doctrines. ROME says that their added traditions are equal to Scripture. ROME says that repetitively chanting Mary's mantra/rosary will defeat the temptations of Satan.
Heresy, thy name is Rome.
Just an FYI the Church list three principal signs that will come before the end. The order in which these things will happen is not taught definitively and is a topic of speculation.
The 3 signs are
1. The Fulfillment of the Great Commission: Most commonly this is taken to mean that the mere awareness or preaching of the good news of Christ and the Catholic Church has spread out all across the world. Others take this to mean “the universal reign of the Church” - or the dream of Integralism accomplished - the nations are converted/discipled, and submitted to the social kingship of Christ.
2. The Great Apostasy: pretty self explanatory. A near total amount of Christians grow cold and fall away. The collapse of Christendom.
3. The Antichrist: He is revealed he deceives and he reigns.
That’s three BUT the newer CCC includes the common teaching of..
4. The “corporate conversion of the Jews” (the end of Rabbinic Judaism): It points to passages of scripture where it seems to say this will occur just before the end of the time and will trigger the second coming / general resurrection.
AGAIN there is no official order, but the order listed is the probably the most common. But there are a few Catholics out there who mix those four up.
1. For all intents and purposes, the Gospel has been preached to every nation on earth. If not, I wonder which ethnic groups you consider completely untouched by the Gospel.
2. The conversion of the Jews doesn't precede the arrival of the Antichrist. According to the traditional understanding of "another comes in his name. Him you will receive" says the Jews will see the Antichrist as their long-awaited Messiah first. By the grace of God, they will recognize their mistake and then turn to Christ.
I'm not saying now is the time, but it's hard to imagine a world more prone to deny the Truth than one that claims that men can be women and unions which call to heaven for blessing can be blessed inside Catholic churches!
1. The Chinese, I would say.
2. Who said that? Where is it written?
@@erict.35
1. Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-Kiun would be surprised at the suggestion that Gospel has not yet reached China.
2. "I am come, &c, in my Father's name, as the Song of Solomon - sent by God the Father, that by His authority I may fulfill those things which He has promised to you that through Him there may be showered upon you the knowledge of God, grace, salvation, and eternal life. This I have clearly proved to you by many testimonies which the Father hath given me. Yet ye do not receive Me, but treat Me as a false prophet. Wherefore by the just judgement of God it shall come to pass that if another, who is really a false prophet, shall come to you, one who is not sent by God, but who shall come in his own name, i.e. in his own authority, falsely boasting himself to be the Messiah, such an one ye will receive. *Another therefore will be that Antichrist whom the Jews will receive,* though they rejected Christ. To this apply the words of Paul (2Thes.ii10) "Therefore God shall send upon them the working of error, that they may believe a lie, that all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity." So SS. Chrysostom, Cyril, Augustine, and the ancient writers, passim. Again, another may mean any false prophet, pretending to be Christ, and therefore a forerunner of Antichrist, like that Egyptian, shortly after the time of Christ, who led thousands of men to destruction."
- Cornelius a Lapide,
commentary on John 5:43
(AD1637)
@@carissstewart3211 yeah, it reached the nation like 200 years ago and like .001% of the entire nation has been introduced to catholic religion. So… yeah.
@@erict.35
You're guilty of a categorical error here. I pointed out that the Gospel has been preached to every *nation* and asked which *ethnic groups* are as yet completely untouched. You're response is to point out that not every *individual* has heard the Gospel. What percentage of a given population must directly hear the Gospel from the Catholic Church in order to fulfill the prophecy? Bearing in mind that a general apostacy, such as the one we're living in now, is one of the signs of the End as well.
The Catholic Church in China is small compared to the overall population (about 0.43% to 0.7% of a population of over a billion people is actually significant), but it is there. So... yeah.
@@carissstewart3211 guy, I’m not even arguing with you… I’m just amazed at how little people in China actually know anything about Catholic religion. If that’s what was meant by the sentence “Gospel will be preached to all nations,” then alright, I guess… But don’t be like: oh, that’s enough error or whatever.. like, cmon.
Edit: how few people
It’s been here for a while now, or at least a trial run - a type
Hey Brian ! Question:
I am a convert, and because I was raised around many Protestant cultures, I am very familiar with the idea of a mass conversion of Jews to Christ as an important eschatological bullet point.... But even among Protestants this is not universal (pre millenial, etc etc etc).... When I converted, I was not sure what the Church's stance was, and even would have assumed it was less bold than you stated (since Catholicism tends to be fare more metaphorical with Revelation than many other Christian groups).
Is there somewhere I can read official Church teaching on this mass conversion phenomena ?
Thanks and respect +
Yes, read this section of the Catechism: www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s2c2a7.htm
The Catholic & Orthodox Churches are NOT more "metaphorical", and almost in all cases the literal interpretation must come 1st. But the visions in John are meant to be looked at differently that's all. The Protestant pagans don't even understand the literal meaning of Scripture, that is the point
@@EasternRomeOrthodoxy I mean metaphorical on Genesis, the age of the Earth, literal talking snake, literally humans from dust (as opposed to 'theistic evolution') -- even things like Noah and the Flood, certain details of the Exodus -- many Catholic speakers are not going to demand that each and every detail is absolute history.
@@matthewbateman6487 🇷🇺☦️🤝✝️ Excuse me? What you said is blasphemy not Catholicism, so take it back!. Clearly you haven't read our Church fathers. Fyi It is called Origenism.
1. Genesis is clear that the age of the universe is 13,000 years (days of creation+human lineage)
2. Genesis is very clear that it was a literal snake - the 1st Snake which the Satan used as an agent to deceive Adam & Eve
3. Genesis is clear it is a literal flood & you don't even believe a basic thing like that??
4. What details in Exodus? Shsme!
Listen, your modernist Catholcism has already been condemned by Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors, so I suggest read it instead of being influenced by the heretical views of the "Thomistic" Institute. You Catholics need to learn the Hebrew to understand the text deeply. Take it back, brother.
@@matthewbateman6487 🇷🇺☦️🤝✝️ Excuse me? What you said is blasphemy not Catholicism, so take it back!. Clearly you haven't read our Church fathers. Fyi It is called Origenism.
1. Genesis is clear that the age of the universe is 13,000 years (days of creation+human lineage)
2. Genesis is very clear that it was a literal snake - the 1st Snake which the Satan used as an agent to deceive Adam & Eve
3. Genesis is clear it is a literal flood & you don't even believe a basic thing like that??
4. What details in Exodus? Brother, everything in Bible's historical narrative must be taken literally!
Listen, your modernist Catholcism has already been condemned by Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors, so I suggest read it instead of being influenced by the heretical views of the "Thomistic" Institute. You Catholics need to learn the Hebrew to understand the text deeply. Take it back, brother.
@brianholdsworth my only issue with this, I'd challenge the idea of the heresy of the antichrist as easy to identify. For why would anyone join the antichrist outright without being mislead?
YOU: For why would anyone join the antichrist outright without being mislead?
*ME: According to Revelation 13, the AntiChrist* (a hom0sexual, Daniel 11:37) *will suffer a mortal wound on his head/arm -- but he lives anyway -- and those on earth say "who can make war with him ??" meaning that you can't kill him so how can you fight him.... then the False Shepherd/Prophet makes a statue of this AntiChrist and forces the world to take a "mark" on their head/hand that symbolizes that they worship the AntiChrist -- you will not be able to buy food, shelter, have a job, etc without this "mark" -- and eventually the False Shepherd/Prophet has everyone killed that will not convert and take the ""mark" of the AntiChrist* -- see this False Prophet's "church" described in Revelation 17:4-6.
And THAT is why everyone will join the AntiChrist -- *and they will ALL be tormented in the Lake of Fire FOREVER* -- Revelation 14:9-11 -- *along with the AntiChrist, False Prophet and Satan* -- see Revelation 19:30, Revelation 20:10,14-15, Matthew 25:41,46, 2Thes 1:9, etc.
Please does anyone know that intro hymn? It makes the hair on the back of my neck stand
Yes. The "Ape of the Church". We can see it everywhere. Let's go Brandon 🤠
This is a bad pope. And his actions are breaking my heart. It shakes my faith in what the Church teaches about Her Magisterium. I converted because I saw the Catholic Church as being the True Fatih. The Fatih of the Church Fathers. This Pope contradicts the Fathers.
According to the warning of the Apostles, the church would have corrupted evil wolves in leadership teaching false doctrines that contradict the Apostles -- see Acts 20:29-30, 2Peter 2:1-3, 1Timothy 4:1-5, etc.
Curious, what is the painting at 5:53 ?
I don't get the "the Jews will all be converted first" part. Are we supposed to expect that EVERY SINGLE JEW will convert? The CCC says this: "The glorious Messiah's coming is suspended at every moment of history until his recognition by 'all Israel,' for 'a hardening has come upon part of Israel' in their 'unbelief' toward Jesus. [...] The 'full inclusion' of the Jews in the Messiah's salvation, in the wake of 'the full number of the Gentiles,' will enable the people of God to achieve 'the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ,' in which 'God may be all in all.'"
My understanding is that all of Isreal is more of some collective declaration by Isreal (perhaps as a state) declaring that Jesus is the Messiah, not that every single Jew, especially every single ethnic Jew, will convert. That also just seems absurd. Are we really to believe that every single Jew on the planet will accept Jesus as the Messiah? Or that every single religious Jew accepts Jesus as the Messiah? HOW? God won't forcibly convert them, we know that for a fact, as he doesn't rape anyone's free will. Then why would every single Jew convert? I don't think this is what the CCC is actually teaching.
Also, this is more of a question than the last one, but does this mean that no additional non-jew will convert after this declaration by Israel (or perhaps Jewish religious authorities or every single Jew)?
Another question: if we come to the end times when, let's say, all Israel has converted and all religious Jews have converted, or whatever obvious sign comes that this step is fulfilled, then if even one non-jew truly accepts Jesus as his Lord and Savior after the fact, then would that disprove the Catholic Church? I guess what I'm asking is: is this infallible teaching? How about new-born babies that will be born in that period? Will people stop birthing babies starting from Israel's conversion through the antichrist's reign through the battle or Armageddon? This whole thing just doesn't make any sense...
The utter inability to reach obvious conclusions is one of the biggest problems of our time, Brian. Eg. Don't blame Vat2 for the current catastrophe in the church, safe and effective, trust the science, what is a woman? etc. Pachamama, same sex blessings, "climate change," reasonable hope all men saved, hell empty... the list is almost endless. While your advice about not jumping to unsubstantiated conclusions would be sound in any age, this video came across as somewhat predictable and, at best, naive.
What exactly are you waiting for, Brianr? A figure in a big red cape with horns? (Another Sheen quote, by the way)
All those things you list turn easily into vapor as something to be levied against the Holy Father.
The true Church is never apart from Rome. Never.
@brianholdsworth, please read the Book of Truth by Maria Divine Mercy. Jesus explains everything in it. God bless
They named the ape Novus Ordo.
Its possible that the end times arent going to happen in a linear way, but in layers. So it may have been happening and still to happen.
The next Synod will seal the Ape of Church.
No. The true Church will never be apart from Rome, for on the Rock of Peter Christ established it.
If you believe that, then you don’t believe in Jesus’ promise of the indefectibility and infallibility of the magisterium and Pope.
Why would a sedevacantist quote Fulton Sheen? That's like when protestants quote Church Fathers in an attempt to support sola scriptura
Brian said he found the quote on a sede site, although many others have it as well, and it does sound quite like the conciliar church:
“[Satan] will set up a counterchurch which will be the ape of the [Catholic] Church. . . . It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content.”
Pope Francis is doing the ape of the church pretty well!
All or the sacraments were changed in the new church.
I’m reading a good book about the mass atm, Federico Suarez.. seems some are clinging more to man made traditions and less to interior disposition and charity.
True
Sorry but i'm not ready for the second coming ....
I'm now enjoying my kids and grand kids too much now to get interrupted ....
Hey you look like Jesus😂 Enjoyed your content 😊
So the second coming won’t happen until all gentiles and Jews recognize that Christ is Lord.
My question is, will that ever happen?
lol
People deny the Pope.
I think Sheen got these ideas from C.S. Lewis
Brian I dont think that it is a good idea to hold still in church of the Ape😊
The world is crumbling around us and our souls are no longer safe even at church… this is so sad. Lord PLEASE take Francis ASAP and bring us a Catholic Pope.
Better the devil you know. Further Popes due to the liberal age group voting we could get one worse actually. Careful what you wish for 😂
@@catholicguy1073 I don’t think so. And the long term is looking good. We have shaken out most of the lgbt pedos it seems. And they have polled the younger priests as the most conservative in generations. Future looks bright.
It sure looks like it
Antichrist is AI
Protestants 🤝 Rad Trads
"The bishop of Rome is anti-christ."
The anti-Christ is Jewish
It is not generally believed that THE Antichrist will be a pope, but a false pope will be the Antichrist's prophet, or accomplice.