@@Jessersadler the engine's sounding great, but the door? That sounded more like the window was about to fall off. Cool car though, even in beige it looks good
So raw, so analog, so physical. You can imagine all those parts working together like clockwork. No wires, computers, sensors, chips or plastic in between. It's beautiful! The noises, squeaks, the vibrations. You can almost smell this car; axle grease, gasoline and old upholstery. Just you and the car. Cars haven't been made like this for longer than I've been alive. And I'm in my 40's. I do have to say, you are brave. At 200kmh, those old brakes... well, you might as well not have any in case of an emergency. I can also see the vibration of the tires through the rear view mirror. Quite the experience!
It depends on the owner, literally the first thing I did on mine was replacing the brakes to modern discs with a vacuum pump that combined with thicker suspension bars and stiffer springs do give it a safer feeling on European highways. Up until around 180km/h when the aerodynamics lift up the front side and you lose all steering. She will go up to 230 but considering the fact I just told you its safer not to.
@@miljororforsprakpartiet290 Actually not really a mustang with 4 original working drum brakes will pass inspection but one with disc brakes with perforated rotors or rotors too big for the original wheels to fit will fail inspection for having illegal tuning parts.
My dad was a military pilot & bought a 67' Mustang with the 289 motor. I took my driver's license test in that car at 16. A month later I had it on the Beltway around Washington DC doing the limit, which was about 70 mph back then, so everyone did at least 80. Even mum used to fly in that car. We had the Mustang for over 20 years. They become part of the family.
Driving older cars like this is a much more sensory experience than modern cars. You really feel like you are operating a machine, feeling, hearing and smelling the engine, feeling the gears. You can understand how the car will respond to your inputs because they were much simpler machines.
Porsches and BMWs in the '80s and '90s were some of the last "pure" machines that you're talking about. Tech started to change rapidly and affect the driving experience in the late '90s and early '00s. Driver interaction became secondary, for one.
@@mikeoxhard3826 the e9x chassis were nice, don't get me wrong, but there's a reason why the E30 and E46 chassis basically have sonnets written about them. They are _fantastic._ I hope you get behind the wheel of some of them sometime. Cheers.
If you’ve never been in the drivers seat of the ‘65-‘66 Mustangs and looked out over that long hood, it really was an amazing view. The 260 c.I. V-8 that was the first V-8 offered before the 289 was a great little engine. For very little money an Edelbrock aluminum intact and Holly 4-barrel carb would wake up the little 260 and it could hold its own with the 283 Camaro. Those were the days when any young guy with curiosity and ambition could have a lot of fun waking up those Mustangs. Just like this one.
I went 90 in a 1973 Lincoln, 78 in a 1973 Mercury colony park, and 70 in a 1935 Hudson. The front hood in itself was an artform, the difference between a star point hood and then a wide expanse like a 1973 Lincoln is incredible.
Oddity alert: Camaro appeared in 1967. A '67 Camaro with a 283 would almost certainly have been a Swiss built example. Everything else in '67 -- even the Belgian-built ones -- had a 327 as the entry-level V8.
Our family had a “68” fastback with a 289 years ago. Ocean blue was her color. There really is a huge difference in driving the older ones than the new ones. People today have no idea the difference that suspensions make in handling. You really had to be able to handle one. Love them
I'm an old guy in the US and all I have to say is your brave . That is no more than a stylized Ford Falcon and to cruise at 125 mph is crazy ! If that had drum brakes ..... you couldn't stop if you had to .
Can't tell for certain but I thought when he was getting in there the pedal looked like it indicated disc brakes because any models that had disc brakes it indicated on the pedal because it was such a new thing. I'd be more worried though about the single chamber master cylinder that these came with from the factory.
@@thomasopdahl1873 uhh WHAT? Lol. All of chevy's 5.0 and smaller engines were dogs. I'd really like to know what fantasy you're basing this on where something like a 289 hipo, 351C, boss 302, didn't breathe well.The windsors were more limited with the heads but displacement being equal ford always destroyed chevy.
I had a buddy in High School who had a 65 Mustang and we would take it out and bury the speedometer at an indicated 120mph +. The front end started to float which was very exciting. haha. I guess we were living under the premise "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger." ;-) This video brought back a lot of fond memories. Thank you.
@@cheftomsd No. Ford keys from that time were single sided. The square headed key was for the door locks and ignition. The round headed key was for the trunk.
@@jurivlk5433 It helped that the 289 was a smaller engine and therefore made the front end less heavy which made the car more balanced than let’s say a big block 427. Muscle cars have always been good at highway driving. Straight lines is what they were built for
@@Vidata Maybe, although I've already watched a Mustang race on a very tight race track and the Mustangs were doing quite well. I don't know if they were as fast as the following Trabant racing cars (over 180 km/h!) and it's not a joke! The race track was in Switzerland and is more suitable for go-carts since there is only one straight!
@@jurivlk5433 It might’ve had a new rear suspension setup. My friend upgraded his 68 fastbacks suspension and steering box and it handles like a dream. Over here in the US mustangs are knownas crowd killers which isn’t undeserved due to its notorious live axle it has had in the rear until 2015 allowing the back end to breakout pretty easily if you aren’t an extremely skilled driver. Only the svt cobras from 99-04 has IRS before then. Those handle great too.
Great video! I had a 1966 mustang with a 347 stroker motor when I was a teenager, my first car... it was a father son project. My top speed was 100 mph or 160 kph, which was by far the scariest thing I have done to date. That thing swayed and bounced around like no other. I actually sold it three years ago to a couple from Germany, still my favorite car I've ever owned.
Funny....we all thought the same thing, this kid "does not" know how to drive a manual transmission with any smoothness or finesse. I practically snorted when he downshifted just before the light.
Suggestion: as well as the specs showing hp torque, displacement, you also listed the car's weight and possibly transmission. Really helps contextualize the expected performance (i.e not just how much power, also how much weight does that power have to move around, and how is that power put onto the ground).
listen to the video and youll know how many gears it has? as for the weight alot of older car guys just know these things cause theyve heard it alot and just know whats heavier or lighter. these suckers are light. one of the lightest sports cars.
My 2008 GT 5sp will keep you busy over 100mph when there are dips in the road. It ain’t that great and you have to pay attention. 125 is significantly worse. I can only imagine how this little Mustang lightens up and dances on its toes at that speed.
@@rustyaxelrod surprisingly enough alot of the older cars do handle pretty well. the suspension was heavy and had little deflection due to being actual metal. but tires and shocks werent so hot at the time and everyone thought they were bad. modern tires and shocks will make most old cars drive like a new one. but many old cars have bump steer and that can be pretty scary. steering rack conversions have been getting more common as it cuts bump steer down a ton and makes them handle even better.
I drive a ‘68 and I’d never dream of pushing it that fast. And a ragtop to boot. Wow! Some one did some good work on that car. You’ve got b🎱lls to do that. 🇨🇦👍🏼
Hi, I live in Brazil and I've seen several super machines on your channel. I confess that by far this Mustang is the most beautiful car you've ever taken to drive. The classic lines, the beautiful interior, the roar of the engine and the icing on the cake... the manual transmission with floor lever! Ball show friend! very good! 👏😎👍
they were given for 200bhp at the crank, they do reasonably less at the wheels. My 66 does 125hp/302Nm on the dyno, still does 170kph easily with a 3 speed manual gearbox :) (the one in the video is a 4 speed manual)
Probably the same 289 2V that’s in my 65. The 4V was rated 225. I have the goofy three speed “Cruise-o-matic” so instead of PRND21 it’s PRN Drive second gear start DL. He’s probably only doing 120 mph.
the mustang sounds like a built engine. close to what my 66 sounded like it had about 350 hp at the crank but with the gearing it would only do 150 mph tops and thats with a 4 speed top loader . i always wanted to change the rear gears out for more top end speed but never got the chance
I had one back in 1967 exactly like this. It was a 66, convertible, 289 and light yellow - fantastic car. Absolutely a blast to drive. The only reason I got rid of it was the rust eating up the rear quarter panels after a few years - Northern Ohio winters and salt.
I love the noisy sound of every gear change.. motor sound and High rpm rattling.. great driving feedback.. i love the fact it scares you.. no comfort just sheer power!!!!
for an over half century old car, I'm pretty impressed it got to 200 as effortlessly as it did and tracked as straight. Seems like a sketchy thing to try but that was amazing.
@@pbaker7160 Not if you are comparing it to a say a modern sports car ... Its over half a century old, only 200hp when it was new, and it did it quite effortlessly. Context you fool ... its important.
My first new car was a ‘65 Mustang that I traded a blown dual quad Chev 409 for. Only thing I could get at the moment was a 3 speed auto 289. I replaced the manifold, carb and cam with Shelby. I was fresh back from overseas and took it from south jersey to college in west Tennessee. Paid for college by running and selling booze from what I bought in Kentucky and sold in my dry county in Tennessee. Those were the days!😊
Nice. Looks like a '65 with that gauge cluster. The '66 had a different cluster, which I believe was from the '65 GT package. Either way, it is nice seeing a first generation Mustang driving flat out.
Guys... that's a European-spec Mustang. Sold new in Europe. They were optioned differently, often as models one year behind American versions. The SAME thing happened with American cars imported to Australia back then. Most notably, the speedometer was graduated in KPH, not MPH.
@@NorthernChev it's not a T5, it's an imported US spec mustang. Has mustang script + the slapped on reflectors on the back. Changing the gauge face to kph is required for the registration process in Europe
Yeah but the 'Bahn is dead smooth,nothing like our shit roads. Even those black patches you see, yes those are patches and you won't feel a click or even hear the tire noise change tone they do it so much better then we do. Can't have some dude chucking some cold patch down and calling it good.
Oh my my!! That engine sounded sooo good!! My first car was a 66 stang 289V8 automatic. Metallic candy apple red. It was a 15 yr old's dream car!!! Wish I still had it!
Back in the day, stock 68 Mustang, 302 two barrel, biased ply tires, 108mph was all she'd do with the front end hiked up and floating all over the place. What a ride when you're 16 and invincible.
So much respect for that video!!! Pure ORGASM for a real car enthusiast even just to see and hear it :) This 'Stang' runs still impressive even now! Hard to imagine what people felt like back in the 60's riding this Pony ;) Thanks a Billion! Smashed Like and Subscribe buttons without any doubt!
Being this is an imported mustang originally sold outside of Germany, I'm assuming from USA. (In Germany if memory serves me the Mustang was already copyrighted so it was called a T5 and didn't have the mustang script on the fenders.) It would appear this is a 64 and 1/2 or 65 being it doesn't have the 3 "finger" trim/ faux brake scoops on the rear quarter panels as well as the dash is a sweeping speedometer and warning lights with no other guages the 66 has the round speedometer and round gages for fuel, alternator, oil pressure, and coolant/engine temperature... miss my 66 I had
@@jlmljames I was fifteen when I got a new 64 1/2. White with black interior, It was a nice car, well equipped, had a stick shift, but there were much faster cars around in those days. Handling wasn't great in wet weather, the rear would break loose, and brakes were "just okay" for a factory model. If you wanted more, then Ford would certainly sell you a Shelby.
@@nomebear That is true but the feeling of a car like that my 1st/3rd car was a '66 coupe (1991 my dad restored it) with a 289 2bbl with auto yes it was SLIPPERY on wet or even damp roads but when you knew how to drive it it was a blast driving it while the rear end was on edge of breaking loose was a rush. It would top out at 120-130mph from floating the valves. But cruising night with the fox bodies and cameros pulling besidfe me was fun as well (remember stock 289 2bbl) I would put it in wet weather drive (started out in 2nd gear not 1st) and not even look at the person beside me and wait for the light to turn... floor it wait till I was doing about 10mph and drop it into normal drive and t would shift into 1st ad the back tires would squeal for a bout half a second and the rear would shimmy once and I would take off like a bat out of torment while I would have about 3 car lengths ahead... fun times
Yea it happens....lol They get old and get "stuck" and slowly go down to 0...you can see that it was still moving down when the light turned and he started to go......
I've been over 120mph (200kph) in my sister's Mustang 68 when I was a kid. That was on backroad two lanes in Alabama. She was cute, tall, blonde and had a lead foot. The first three got her out of tickets. It rode like this at similar speed. She later had a 77 Cougar which had an 80mph speedo. It didn't have a top peg though. It'd wind around back to the zero rest. I have no idea how fast...but it looked similar and felt like a flying carpet compared to her Mustang and Maverick. She next bought a 79 Firebird Trans Am, T Top without the screaming chicken decal....but a Smokey and the Bandit edition. My little brother slammed that into a telephone pole a mile from the house on a 30mph residential, trying it out. Totalled it. I see that, despite claims to the contrary German Freeways still have a few left lane campers, and given 3 lanes trucks live right and good drivers live center.
You know that going in center or left line is illegal, right? You can use them for overtaking, sure. But after that manouvre, you must return back to the most right line. Unfortunatelly a lot of drivers are pain in the ..., blocking center or left line with slow speed. And you also can`t overtake them using one of lines on their right, which makes them even greater a**holes.
@@halbichp odd that I see lots of photos of a solid line of OTR truckers in the right lane near Berlin and cars moving in lane 2 (middle) and passing in 3 (left). Hardly a car in lane 1 (right) Photographic evidence denies your stated rules.
@@solocamo3654 I think he is aware that this car consumes a lot of gas .It is just funny to see how the needle drops in a short time I'm worried about the noises, is that standard? The car sounds like it's is going to fall apart.. so, the only thing that is ridiculus is the build quality.
Too bad people forget how bad some modern cars are. My 2014 C63 got 12 miles per gallon and had a tank barely larger than 50L. Go back to your Tesla, this is the wrong channel for you
@@myz06rocks That C63 has twice the power and weighs over 4000 lbs, and will TROUNCE that 289. 3.7 seconds zero to sixty and 11.9 quarter mile vs mid-eight seconds to 60 and 17 or so second quarter mile for the Mustang? And it does it in comfort and style. It also gets 18/21/27 mpg if you keep your foot out of it. You might see 15-20 mpg with the 289, with half the power and much less weight (about 2500 lbs). Nostalgia's a powerful thing, apparently.
reminds me of my 1st car, a 1968 Mustang Convertible, it had a 302 4barrel high compression, with a 3spd, the car had manual everything, no a/c, it was the best car I've ever had
These cars were very light, even with the V8 and the extra bracing off the convertible body they came in at just under 3,000 pounds. Speed is a function of the power/weight ratio. You don't need much power to go fast if you haven't got much weight to move.
And this is straight line driving which was the big objective in the 1960s and 70s American brands as the US was giving up curvy US Highways built in the 30s for the new interstates.
I wünsch dir echt die million subs zu knacken und an die top autos zu kommen, alte oder neue. Während die anderen (AutoTopNL) fast nur noch shorts machen, wir fahr'n ma wieder 300 um den gewinn zu maximieren, hier immer lange videos vom reinen fahren. Next: eine Ente, mal sehen ob du mit der schaltung klar kommst und die 100 erreichst^^
Yeah - I have a 1966 289 hi-performance GT - runs about 260 horses. British Racing Green I've never had it over 125 mph. Any faster than that and you feel like death is not too far away.
It holds up pretty well for an old car. It gets pretty shaky at the 200 mark, but still pretty steady and firm. It sure brings me back memories of my old Mustang.
@@orangesharpy sorry not all cars 2022 Chevrolet Spark and 2022 Mitsubishi Mirage are slower, am going by cars available in the US I know Europe and Asia have slower cars that are not available in the US
My first car was a 1967 Firebird 400 with a 2spd powerglide trans. I ran it up to a little over 125mph or 201km.. A shakey nerve wrecking experience tho...lol My A6 is rock solid at 130mph.
I'm glad you survived the experience. I also love the feel of these old cars. The lack of safety and warning systems in these cars is why I keep the ones I drive on tracks when doing high speed runs. Keeps me safer and more importantly, innocent people safer. It takes one sudden tire failure and your ramming into a family in a mini van. Anyway, neat video. Nice car. Have fun and good luck.
I hope everyone watching his video gets a chance once in their life to experience what an old American muscle car is like. There’s something different about it. Maybe because it’s not as refined or as safe as new cars, but you can hear the engine roar and "feel"the car. I love new cars but driving an old school is just different. I currently have a 75 Apollo getting a new engine as we speak. No LS, just the 350. I can’t wait to drive it!
So very true! I live in the states and had a 1966 Cadillac. It would amaze people when I pulled away from then on the highway at 90+, people forget old cars can haul azz...
@@67FORDTRUCKF250 it's so interesting because when we look at these cars now, they're Classics and we baby them because we don't want to break them. But back then, they were really traveling across the country without worry.
I don't know who would consider this a muscle car. I think it is slightly modified, but a muscle car just about has to be a big block or higher hp larger v8 to be a muscle car at the time. A 289 mustang would just be a run of the mill car back then
I have owned my 1966 Mustang 2+2 since 1975. in 2019 she got a complete rebuild with modern brakes etc. Still 200 KPH OSUNDS really fast even if in my younger days I did that with drum brakes. Thanks
I like watching these German Autobahn videos where cars are going considerably faster than any highway in the United States. I am guessing that this classic 1966 Ford Mustang has a heavy duty radiator installed in it. This is because most cars of that era would overheat if driven at sustained high speeds with the original equipment radiator.
It awsom!! Mustang really beast 💪. But the other side of medal I think to drive this muscle car on speed like this is like to kisses with tiger - 30% of pleasure and 70% of fear 😉. P.s. thank you very much for doing this for us, shaking your hand🤛
Testing the first Mustang. It was an honor ❤️ What do you want to see next ?
Car's from Russia 😂
what about 80s - 90s youngtimer? p.e. Ford Sierra, Opel Omega A...
'80s and '90s hot hatch if you have balls😈
I belive so , also was like 100 euros in petrol xD
Mercedes
That car makes ALL the right noises. From the engine to the doors getting-shut and everything in between - it’s all so organic. Wow
I believe the word you're looking for is visceral.
@@Jessersadler oh yeah that’s better
@@Jessersadler viscerally bad ASS!!!! My favorite mustang is the 65/66 fastback.
@@Jessersadler the engine's sounding great, but the door? That sounded more like the window was about to fall off. Cool car though, even in beige it looks good
@@morkelork4730 It's a convertible, and 45 years old. . .
So raw, so analog, so physical. You can imagine all those parts working together like clockwork. No wires, computers, sensors, chips or plastic in between. It's beautiful! The noises, squeaks, the vibrations. You can almost smell this car; axle grease, gasoline and old upholstery. Just you and the car. Cars haven't been made like this for longer than I've been alive. And I'm in my 40's.
I do have to say, you are brave. At 200kmh, those old brakes... well, you might as well not have any in case of an emergency. I can also see the vibration of the tires through the rear view mirror. Quite the experience!
It depends on the owner, literally the first thing I did on mine was replacing the brakes to modern discs with a vacuum pump that combined with thicker suspension bars and stiffer springs do give it a safer feeling on European highways. Up until around 180km/h when the aerodynamics lift up the front side and you lose all steering. She will go up to 230 but considering the fact I just told you its safer not to.
Guess it's hard to pass inspection with brakes from the 60s Lmcao.
@@miljororforsprakpartiet290 it is not here in Argentina ;)
@@miljororforsprakpartiet290 Actually not really a mustang with 4 original working drum brakes will pass inspection but one with disc brakes with perforated rotors or rotors too big for the original wheels to fit will fail inspection for having illegal tuning parts.
eh? no wires?? hahahahaha
My dad was a military pilot & bought a 67' Mustang with the 289 motor. I took my driver's license test in that car at 16. A month later I had it on the Beltway around Washington DC doing the limit, which was about 70 mph back then, so everyone did at least 80. Even mum used to fly in that car. We had the Mustang for over 20 years. They become part of the family.
Best decision ever, just got a 1966 ford mustang coupe 351W engine and its more fun to drive than a 718 cayman
@@user-un9ej7th6j Yeah i believe it. The sound of that mustang alone is better than any Porsche.
I don't believe the Speedometer is working correctly.
@leowilliams7578 is speedometer mph or kph?
@@leowilliams7578- it’s in kilometers so that’s 120 and most of those speedometers were about 5% over from the factory so 112 mph
Someone did a good job with the alignment and wheel balancing on that car.
Yepp, that one is in line!! Would have been fun to follow it with my Taunus 20m..
Pensei a mesma coisa . I think the same .
is this a known issue at those cars?
@@BruceCarbonLakeriver , I think so .
@@robertoc.abrahao8119 thx
Driving older cars like this is a much more sensory experience than modern cars. You really feel like you are operating a machine, feeling, hearing and smelling the engine, feeling the gears. You can understand how the car will respond to your inputs because they were much simpler machines.
This is sexual poetry I love you
I drive a 1999 Mercedes-Benz in Brilliant Cilver with only 55,458 miles. You clearly know what your talking about.
Porsches and BMWs in the '80s and '90s were some of the last "pure" machines that you're talking about. Tech started to change rapidly and affect the driving experience in the late '90s and early '00s. Driver interaction became secondary, for one.
Sensory ?? Try foolish !
@@mikeoxhard3826 the e9x chassis were nice, don't get me wrong, but there's a reason why the E30 and E46 chassis basically have sonnets written about them. They are _fantastic._ I hope you get behind the wheel of some of them sometime. Cheers.
If you’ve never been in the drivers seat of the ‘65-‘66 Mustangs and looked out over that long hood, it really was an amazing view. The 260 c.I. V-8 that was the first V-8 offered before the 289 was a great little engine. For very little money an Edelbrock aluminum intact and Holly 4-barrel carb would wake up the little 260 and it could hold its own with the 283 Camaro. Those were the days when any young guy with curiosity and ambition could have a lot of fun waking up those Mustangs. Just like this one.
I went 90 in a 1973 Lincoln, 78 in a 1973 Mercury colony park, and 70 in a 1935 Hudson. The front hood in itself was an artform, the difference between a star point hood and then a wide expanse like a 1973 Lincoln is incredible.
Don't worry young guys are still waking those old pony's up 💪
Oddity alert: Camaro appeared in 1967. A '67 Camaro with a 283 would almost certainly have been a Swiss built example. Everything else in '67 -- even the Belgian-built ones -- had a 327 as the entry-level V8.
had a 64 2dr falcon futura with the 260,3spd. put an aluminum manifold,650 holley and tri y headers. really liked that car!
Despite the 55 years, all horses are alive :)
Ya man - the 289 was a little screamer.
@@audieconrad8995 Especially in the GT350
@@kamata93 had a buddy who had one!💪 giddyup!
Always alive dont forget
Heh not very used too..
Seems like this legend having its age..!!! More classics please..!!
Our family had a “68” fastback with a 289 years ago. Ocean blue was her color. There really is a huge difference in driving the older ones than the new ones. People today have no idea the difference that suspensions make in handling. You really had to be able to handle one. Love them
The rearview mirror has integrated high-speed alert once speedo hits over 180😂
It's scared! lol 😂👍
He hit about 124 MPH. Not bad for a vintage car running a 3 or 4 speed trans.
Not bad for a 66 year old car you mean? That went faster than that originally
4 speed.
@@WitchKing-Of-Angmar maybe the 289 hi-po rated at 271 HP, but this appears to be just a 4 barrel car.
👍🏻💯
@@HDrive60 is this a rebuilt frame? Modern engine? In all my years I never spent time caring for the engine, just the look of the automobile
I'm an old guy in the US and all I have to say is your brave . That is no more than a stylized Ford Falcon and to cruise at 125 mph is crazy ! If that had drum brakes ..... you couldn't stop if you had to .
Can't tell for certain but I thought when he was getting in there the pedal looked like it indicated disc brakes because any models that had disc brakes it indicated on the pedal because it was such a new thing. I'd be more worried though about the single chamber master cylinder that these came with from the factory.
100% agree we had the falcon here in Oz anything over 100 was terrifying but then outside the cities our highways are level 3 roads everywhere else
That speedo is in kilometers per hour...
@@carguy99 Thats why he wrote 125mph, presumably?
No way that speedo needle is pushing 200 mph.
The Ford 289 CI V8 is a hell of a good little motor. Carrol Shelby said it was the best motor he ever was involved with.
Well, there's the 283 Chevy. Small block fords didn't breath very well. I had a 68 mustang 302 4bbl. Not very fast at all. Good on gas though.
I agree, 289 was a little beast
@@thomasopdahl1873 uhh WHAT? Lol. All of chevy's 5.0 and smaller engines were dogs. I'd really like to know what fantasy you're basing this on where something like a 289 hipo, 351C, boss 302, didn't breathe well.The windsors were more limited with the heads but displacement being equal ford always destroyed chevy.
If it wasn’t for Shelby they would never be as good as they are today
@@thomasopdahl1873 Ive never lived in a world where a 283 is even in the same ballpark as a 289. 283 is a boat anchor compared
I had a buddy in High School who had a 65 Mustang and we would take it out and bury the speedometer at an indicated 120mph +. The front end started to float which was very exciting. haha. I guess we were living under the premise "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger." ;-)
This video brought back a lot of fond memories. Thank you.
A Corvair front end would float at 90 mph. Are you afraid?
That speedometer is definitely in Kilometers not mph. I wouldn't trust a mustang of that era over 100 mph. Even new they were all over the road.
0:35 The struggle with the key is epic🤣
Brings back memories
Maybe it was the gloves. Though they did have different keys for locks and ignition
Assume it’s been awhile?
Should be a double sided key. Not sure why the struggle.
@@cheftomsd No. Ford keys from that time were single sided. The square headed key was for the door locks and ignition. The round headed key was for the trunk.
Did you check the real speed with GPS? Nevertheless, 200 km/h+ on the speedo is impressing. Old but gold :)
Eine GPS Anzeige benötigt man eigentlich immer...
My 1964 Comet was all over the road at 120 mph. 200kph is roughly 124mph. It handled great!
@@LezOU i dont think so!
@@LezOU when was the last time you saw a 60 year old mustang with a speedometer going all the way up to 330kmh?
@@misterlove6225 excellent point 😂🤣😂😂
Scary stuff. Brave driver :)
It seems to handle well and would probably pass the moose test without rolling over like many modern cars!
@@jurivlk5433 It helped that the 289 was a smaller engine and therefore made the front end less heavy which made the car more balanced than let’s say a big block 427. Muscle cars have always been good at highway driving. Straight lines is what they were built for
Agreed. Brave driver.
@@Vidata Maybe, although I've already watched a Mustang race on a very tight race track and the Mustangs were doing quite well. I don't know if they were as fast as the following Trabant racing cars (over 180 km/h!) and it's not a joke! The race track was in Switzerland and is more suitable for go-carts since there is only one straight!
@@jurivlk5433 It might’ve had a new rear suspension setup. My friend upgraded his 68 fastbacks suspension and steering box and it handles like a dream. Over here in the US mustangs are knownas crowd killers which isn’t undeserved due to its notorious live axle it has had in the rear until 2015 allowing the back end to breakout pretty easily if you aren’t an extremely skilled driver. Only the svt cobras from 99-04 has IRS before then. Those handle great too.
I'm a huge fan of these first generation Mustangs with the 289. They had a unique sound.
And the 5.0l/4.9l 302ci sounds like a legit big block when idling. One of the most iconic sounds ever
Great video! I had a 1966 mustang with a 347 stroker motor when I was a teenager, my first car... it was a father son project. My top speed was 100 mph or 160 kph, which was by far the scariest thing I have done to date. That thing swayed and bounced around like no other. I actually sold it three years ago to a couple from Germany, still my favorite car I've ever owned.
I drove my 1987 Golf mk2 TD beater clunker 160 kph, it felt surreal and very nice until I almost hit trough the toll booth ramps.
You lose man try to get another one 👍
How old where you when you got it and how old are you now?
My 2 ltr Nissan Qashqai SUV will do 170 km/h ... American v8 cars a shit, end of story
@@psk5746 You're missing the point if you think classic v8's are about speed..
All of the mechanical sounds and the roar of the engine are music to my ears!
You can hear the engine having a ball. No high pitch screaming. You have to love the V8 rumble. 😍🙏🏻
Hit 1st gear at 50 and stop at the red light a second later. A true master driver. He knows how to break the mechanics.
I instantly thought the same
Can't rev match worth a dang, hasn't figured out the car yet so definitely shouldn't be trying to downshift at all like that 🤦
Funny....we all thought the same thing, this kid "does not" know how to drive a manual transmission with any smoothness or finesse. I practically snorted when he downshifted just before the light.
Dude... that speedo is in KPH, not MPH... 50 KPH is only 30 MPH.
The speedometer is clearly off! This guy ain't no driver. Pure amateur. You can tell by the way he holds the wheel.
Minivan flies by while going 140mph. The autobahn is nuts. I didn't realize it was that busy too.
Legends never die. ❤
Господи! Это просто пушка! Звук нереальный! Механика на нем для меня была шоком! Это просто что-то!
Эхх 5ый не хватает!
там км или милли?
@@Vadim_VLZ Км в милях это было бы 320
Скорее всего это экспортный какой-то, ибо приборка в километрах, да ещё и механика
@@Vadim_VLZ
КМ
Very well maintained. Goes strong and consistent. Good job !
+Gloves 10/10
Suggestion: as well as the specs showing hp torque, displacement, you also listed the car's weight and possibly transmission. Really helps contextualize the expected performance (i.e not just how much power, also how much weight does that power have to move around, and how is that power put onto the ground).
listen to the video and youll know how many gears it has? as for the weight alot of older car guys just know these things cause theyve heard it alot and just know whats heavier or lighter. these suckers are light. one of the lightest sports cars.
My 2008 GT 5sp will keep you busy over 100mph when there are dips in the road. It ain’t that great and you have to pay attention. 125 is significantly worse. I can only imagine how this little Mustang lightens up and dances on its toes at that speed.
@@rustyaxelrod surprisingly enough alot of the older cars do handle pretty well. the suspension was heavy and had little deflection due to being actual metal. but tires and shocks werent so hot at the time and everyone thought they were bad. modern tires and shocks will make most old cars drive like a new one. but many old cars have bump steer and that can be pretty scary. steering rack conversions have been getting more common as it cuts bump steer down a ton and makes them handle even better.
I drive a ‘68 and I’d never dream of pushing it that fast. And a ragtop to boot. Wow! Some one did some good work on that car. You’ve got b🎱lls to do that. 🇨🇦👍🏼
German car inspection laws are very strict. Cars with any kind of mechanical issues are not allowed on the road.
The 65 66 are the best looking Mustangs ever built.
Hi, I live in Brazil and I've seen several super machines on your channel. I confess that by far this Mustang is the most beautiful car you've ever taken to drive. The classic lines, the beautiful interior, the roar of the engine and the icing on the cake... the manual transmission with floor lever! Ball show friend! very good! 👏😎👍
they were given for 200bhp at the crank, they do reasonably less at the wheels. My 66 does 125hp/302Nm on the dyno, still does 170kph easily with a 3 speed manual gearbox :) (the one in the video is a 4 speed manual)
Probably the same 289 2V that’s in my 65. The 4V was rated 225. I have the goofy three speed “Cruise-o-matic” so instead of PRND21 it’s PRN Drive second gear start DL. He’s probably only doing 120 mph.
the mustang sounds like a built engine. close to what my 66 sounded like it had about 350 hp at the crank but with the gearing it would only do 150 mph tops and thats with a 4 speed top loader . i always wanted to change the rear gears out for more top end speed but never got the chance
Its a 2 speed power glide😂
@@spankthemonkey3437 it could be, but it looks very close to the 4 speed too loader I had in mine .
@@E3lcpl I was making joke😂
Aaaand that’s when parts start flying off, vibrations get immense and things start breaking 😂. Awesome video!
I had one back in 1967 exactly like this. It was a 66, convertible, 289 and light yellow - fantastic car. Absolutely a blast to drive. The only reason I got rid of it was the rust eating up the rear quarter panels after a few years - Northern Ohio winters and salt.
That driver has balls of steel. I love older classics but I'd be leisurely with them.
Those 289's were tuff. Had a couple of friends with 289's back in school and they beat the living hell out of those little motors.
Wahnsinn, wie souverän sich so ein fast 60 Jahre altes Auto auch heute noch auf der Autobahn bewegen lässt. Danke für das coole Video! :-)
Warum auch nicht?
I love the noisy sound of every gear change.. motor sound and High rpm rattling.. great driving feedback.. i love the fact it scares you.. no comfort just sheer power!!!!
for an over half century old car, I'm pretty impressed it got to 200 as effortlessly as it did and tracked as straight. Seems like a sketchy thing to try but that was amazing.
@@pbaker7160 Not if you are comparing it to a say a modern sports car ... Its over half a century old, only 200hp when it was new, and it did it quite effortlessly.
Context you fool ... its important.
This video captured the feel perfectly. It was epic seeing you chase that Audi TT
American V8 Muscle. That engine kept pulling well over 120mph Awesome video!
My first new car was a ‘65 Mustang that I traded a blown dual quad Chev 409 for. Only thing I could get at the moment was a 3 speed auto 289. I replaced the manifold, carb and cam with Shelby. I was fresh back from overseas and took it from south jersey to college in west Tennessee. Paid for college by running and selling booze from what I bought in Kentucky and sold in my dry county in Tennessee. Those were the days!😊
Nice. Looks like a '65 with that gauge cluster. The '66 had a different cluster, which I believe was from the '65 GT package. Either way, it is nice seeing a first generation Mustang driving flat out.
the 66 also had different door handles and the side molding is different to on the 66.
With the horizontal chrome bars either side of the radiator grill Mustang, would indicate a 1965 model.
@@thairatcatcher gotcha . Thanks for that info .
Guys... that's a European-spec Mustang. Sold new in Europe. They were optioned differently, often as models one year behind American versions. The SAME thing happened with American cars imported to Australia back then. Most notably, the speedometer was graduated in KPH, not MPH.
@@NorthernChev it's not a T5, it's an imported US spec mustang. Has mustang script + the slapped on reflectors on the back. Changing the gauge face to kph is required for the registration process in Europe
Весь автобан в шоке от этого космолёт прошлого
Love the mechanical, authentic, genuinely gorgeous feel of real cars as they used to build them.
Mustangs were notorious for being light in the front end at high speed. Nice job.
The front end floats at 200 km per hour.
Yes all of the Ford compacts and intermediates got a little loose at those speeds. But we did it back then.
You're a brave man for driving an old mustang that fast.
Not to mention loose lap belt, I guess you will be dead at those speeds anyhow, right.
Life is to lived
A life lived in fear is a life half lived
I understand that but it was on a freeway. Even a more modern car could get in trouble if something went wrong.
Ich liebe es wie du Alte Wunderschöne Autos aufährst und nicht in der Garage vergammeln lässt!!!!! Geile Sache!!!!
Hope the suspension and brakes have been upgraded. I'd be a little nervous in that car if it was stock.
Doubt it is he wouldn't drive it if it was
I was a teenager when these were new. This was before radial tires became common place, and we were driving like this on two ply tires.
pump the brakes and your good, jeep now days have worse brakes than this
More importantly, were the tires W speed rated? I'da been more concerned about that than anything else.
@@NorthernChev Sears bias ply special LOL! Seriously I imagine they are speed rated.
The fastest I ever went in my 68 Mustang fastback was around 140 mph. The speedometer only went to 120. Very scary.
Great video. Wish I could do that.
Do it😌😈😈😈
Yeah but the 'Bahn is dead smooth,nothing like our shit roads.
Even those black patches you see, yes those are patches and you won't feel a click or even hear the tire noise change tone they do it so much better then we do.
Can't have some dude chucking some cold patch down and calling it good.
You better have solid front suspension components and tires. In stock form these old cars could be a handful at speeds above about 120 MPH.
It's European, that's km/h not mph
Same here, the speedo goes up to 120 mph (200 kph). That s in kph if you did not notice.
Oh my my!! That engine sounded sooo good!! My first car was a 66 stang 289V8 automatic. Metallic candy apple red. It was a 15 yr old's dream car!!! Wish I still had it!
Back in the day, stock 68 Mustang, 302 two barrel, biased ply tires, 108mph was all she'd do with the front end hiked up and floating all over the place. What a ride when you're 16 and invincible.
I certainly hope it had the optional disc brakes.
I’ll tell you what, I had a 66gt with those brakes and the car would still lock up and skid all over the place. Sketchy as all hell
@@Dunkaroos248 well at least they were strong enough to lock up lol, can’t say the same for a lot of period brakes
@@ryanj116 yeah but driving one of those old cars is a totally different experience, if you lose traction, you better know how to handle it
the beautiful 60s pilot gloves, finding first gear and the key was fundamental
So much respect for that video!!!
Pure ORGASM for a real car enthusiast even just to see and hear it :)
This 'Stang' runs still impressive even now! Hard to imagine what people felt like back in the 60's riding this Pony ;)
Thanks a Billion!
Smashed Like and Subscribe buttons without any doubt!
Being this is an imported mustang originally sold outside of Germany, I'm assuming from USA. (In Germany if memory serves me the Mustang was already copyrighted so it was called a T5 and didn't have the mustang script on the fenders.) It would appear this is a 64 and 1/2 or 65 being it doesn't have the 3 "finger" trim/ faux brake scoops on the rear quarter panels as well as the dash is a sweeping speedometer and warning lights with no other guages the 66 has the round speedometer and round gages for fuel, alternator, oil pressure, and coolant/engine temperature... miss my 66 I had
@@jlmljames I was fifteen when I got a new 64 1/2. White with black interior, It was a nice car, well equipped, had a stick shift, but there were much faster cars around in those days. Handling wasn't great in wet weather, the rear would break loose, and brakes were "just okay" for a factory model. If you wanted more, then Ford would certainly sell you a Shelby.
@@nomebear That is true but the feeling of a car like that my 1st/3rd car was a '66 coupe (1991 my dad restored it) with a 289 2bbl with auto yes it was SLIPPERY on wet or even damp roads but when you knew how to drive it it was a blast driving it while the rear end was on edge of breaking loose was a rush. It would top out at 120-130mph from floating the valves. But cruising night with the fox bodies and cameros pulling besidfe me was fun as well (remember stock 289 2bbl) I would put it in wet weather drive (started out in 2nd gear not 1st) and not even look at the person beside me and wait for the light to turn... floor it wait till I was doing about 10mph and drop it into normal drive and t would shift into 1st ad the back tires would squeal for a bout half a second and the rear would shimmy once and I would take off like a bat out of torment while I would have about 3 car lengths ahead... fun times
@@jlmljames nice 👍
Seeing that pretty much 95% of all vehicles made today wiill smoke that mustang
Scary to drive retro car like this at such speeds, but damn..1966 200 km/h, Hat off, marvelous! :)
My grandma still has her old ‘66 she bought new back in the day. That thing still runs like a charm and is really fun to drive
Love how speedo shows 18 km/h when car is standing still!! 😂
Yea it happens....lol They get old and get "stuck" and slowly go down to 0...you can see that it was still moving down when the light turned and he started to go......
Тачка огонь! Спидометр как на 412-м москвиче. Ещё бы москвич так ехать мог)))
И дверца закрывалась как в москвиче)
Даже сток веста так не едет в 2021г....Умели конечно строить в Америке масл кары👍🥵🔥
@@sergeimamontov8304 Коробка разбитая как в москвиче. И стекло болтается как в москвиче. И руль скрипит как в москвиче. Но выглядит реально круто.
Cruising at about 120 mph , those 289 pony motors were really stout back in the day !! 😉👍🏻
I've been over 120mph (200kph) in my sister's Mustang 68 when I was a kid. That was on backroad two lanes in Alabama. She was cute, tall, blonde and had a lead foot. The first three got her out of tickets.
It rode like this at similar speed.
She later had a 77 Cougar which had an 80mph speedo. It didn't have a top peg though. It'd wind around back to the zero rest. I have no idea how fast...but it looked similar and felt like a flying carpet compared to her Mustang and Maverick.
She next bought a 79 Firebird Trans Am, T Top without the screaming chicken decal....but a Smokey and the Bandit edition. My little brother slammed that into a telephone pole a mile from the house on a 30mph residential, trying it out. Totalled it.
I see that, despite claims to the contrary German Freeways still have a few left lane campers, and given 3 lanes trucks live right and good drivers live center.
You know that going in center or left line is illegal, right? You can use them for overtaking, sure. But after that manouvre, you must return back to the most right line. Unfortunatelly a lot of drivers are pain in the ..., blocking center or left line with slow speed. And you also can`t overtake them using one of lines on their right, which makes them even greater a**holes.
@@halbichp odd that I see lots of photos of a solid line of OTR truckers in the right lane near Berlin and cars moving in lane 2 (middle) and passing in 3 (left). Hardly a car in lane 1 (right)
Photographic evidence denies your stated rules.
I saw him pass on the right when getting on Autobahn. That’s a big verboten 🚫
For all of you American drivers out there, notice how he moves to the right when he's done passing. Just sayin...
Tim Hoyne; Very valid point.. ''Unless overtaking, keep right.''
We have same issue here in Ethiopia too. Amazing.
Me and 3 other Americans know how to properly pass and use the road with consideration for other drivers...
@@davidkuhrt3657 I'm one of the 3 lol! I have a hard time finding a place around me to get my Ford Escort up to that speed though.
very expensive ticket, otherwise..
In an endless array of supercar speed tests, this part of automotive history is a breath of fresh air.
Real cars never die ❤️
You need a GPS Speedo in these videos
Why? Because his foot is completely off the gas pedal and the MPH jumps up 10 on every shift?
@@USERNAME1-x5u /facepalm... that speedo is in KMP, not MPH...
I bet max 180km/h on gps.
Work of art, that’s what this is. Gorgeous is an understatement
А неплохо он кстати дорогу держит на такой скорости. Мое почтение.
Какпо мне то скорость не правдивая
@@klepik818 Даже если завышает немного, все равно для машины тех лет это очень недурно.
Too bad there is no camera pointing at fuel gauge. :)
Yea because when I'm going flat out in a 60's era V8 I think of fuel economy. Jesus some of you euro's are ridiculous.
@@solocamo3654 I think he is aware that this car consumes a lot of gas .It is just funny to see how the needle drops in a short time I'm worried about the noises, is that standard? The car sounds like it's is going to fall apart.. so, the only thing that is ridiculus is the build quality.
Too bad people forget how bad some modern cars are. My 2014 C63 got 12 miles per gallon and had a tank barely larger than 50L. Go back to your Tesla, this is the wrong channel for you
@@solocamo3654 So, you think it's ridiculous for people to be concerned with fuel economy?
@@myz06rocks That C63 has twice the power and weighs over 4000 lbs, and will TROUNCE that 289. 3.7 seconds zero to sixty and 11.9 quarter mile vs mid-eight seconds to 60 and 17 or so second quarter mile for the Mustang? And it does it in comfort and style. It also gets 18/21/27 mpg if you keep your foot out of it. You might see 15-20 mpg with the 289, with half the power and much less weight (about 2500 lbs). Nostalgia's a powerful thing, apparently.
reminds me of my 1st car, a 1968 Mustang Convertible, it had a 302 4barrel high compression, with a 3spd, the car had manual everything, no a/c, it was the best car I've ever had
Hahaha i like how you struggle to closing door and finding keys. Good old nostalgia memories :)
imaginen la cara de la gente yendo a 160 siendo rebasado por este veterano cincuenton, y que gustazo se dio el chofer.
I’m wanting to buy a 1965 mustang some day,,this video made me want one even more,,man that 203hp really kicks,,great video
American classic!!!!👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻💯💯💯💯💯💯💯🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
I like to see more cars the same categoria from the 60’
German
French
Japon
Thanks
Nice vídeo like always
Old school classic speed right there. Brings back good times.
поклон этому автомобилю, в таком возрасте держать левую полосу на автобане в 21 веке! Уважаю.
Nice driving. It's amazing that fifty-year-old car can go 124 mph.
These cars were very light, even with the V8 and the extra bracing off the convertible body they came in at just under 3,000 pounds. Speed is a function of the power/weight ratio. You don't need much power to go fast if you haven't got much weight to move.
And this is straight line driving which was the big objective in the 1960s and 70s American brands as the US was giving up curvy US Highways built in the 30s for the new interstates.
Esses vídeos de POV são tão perfeitos, eu me imagino como se fosse o cara dirigindo. Traz um sentimento muito bom.
I wünsch dir echt die million subs zu knacken und an die top autos zu kommen, alte oder neue. Während die anderen (AutoTopNL) fast nur noch shorts machen, wir fahr'n ma wieder 300 um den gewinn zu maximieren, hier immer lange videos vom reinen fahren. Next: eine Ente, mal sehen ob du mit der schaltung klar kommst und die 100 erreichst^^
Pretty fast, actually. Thanks for the video. 👌
Yeah - I have a 1966 289 hi-performance GT - runs about 260 horses. British Racing Green I've never had it over 125 mph. Any faster than that and you feel like death is not too far away.
It holds up pretty well for an old car. It gets pretty shaky at the 200 mark, but still pretty steady and firm. It sure brings me back memories of my old Mustang.
its only 200 kmh not miles any new car would destroy this car, its more a fashion statement than anything else
@@lu-dx6oh Uh yea, I know the difference between KMH and MPH. Not all Americans are as stupid as you think.
@@lu-dx6oh Any new car? You sure about that?
@@orangesharpy sorry not all cars 2022 Chevrolet Spark and 2022 Mitsubishi Mirage are slower, am going by cars available in the US I know Europe and Asia have slower cars that are not available in the US
My first car was a 1967 Firebird 400 with a 2spd powerglide trans.
I ran it up to a little over 125mph or 201km.. A shakey nerve wrecking experience tho...lol
My A6 is rock solid at 130mph.
Those 289s have a distinct and fabulous roar. Not the most powerful V8 out there but still fun to drive and sounds like a dream.
I'm glad you survived the experience. I also love the feel of these old cars. The lack of safety and warning systems in these cars is why I keep the ones I drive on tracks when doing high speed runs. Keeps me safer and more importantly, innocent people safer. It takes one sudden tire failure and your ramming into a family in a mini van. Anyway, neat video. Nice car. Have fun and good luck.
These cars were not built for such speeds. Driving a Mustang at these speeds is taking your life in your hands. A brave soul, indeed.
We did it in the day and we survived. But yes they had weak brakes and pretty lame front suspension
@@helpful5539 Lucky to have survived all the crazy things I did in my younger days. But, I'm still here.
And this is a CONVERTIBLE Mustang! Awesome video!
I hope everyone watching his video gets a chance once in their life to experience what an old American muscle car is like. There’s something different about it. Maybe because it’s not as refined or as safe as new cars, but you can hear the engine roar and "feel"the car. I love new cars but driving an old school is just different. I currently have a 75 Apollo getting a new engine as we speak. No LS, just the 350. I can’t wait to drive it!
So very true! I live in the states and had a 1966 Cadillac. It would amaze people when I pulled away from then on the highway at 90+, people forget old cars can haul azz...
@@67FORDTRUCKF250 it's so interesting because when we look at these cars now, they're Classics and we baby them because we don't want to break them. But back then, they were really traveling across the country without worry.
@@67FORDTRUCKF250 Buick made great GM engines in those days.....High octane only....You didn't want spark knock.
I don't know who would consider this a muscle car. I think it is slightly modified, but a muscle car just about has to be a big block or higher hp larger v8 to be a muscle car at the time. A 289 mustang would just be a run of the mill car back then
The 289 is such an underrated engine!
Ford needs to bring a “modern” version of that engine back. That would be a good engine for the ‘full size’ Ford Bronco (not the sport).
@@bikdav Absolutely!
@@bikdav I love the full size Bronco but with a V6 not so much!
@@ko4otv43 I also got many reports of it's V6 engine prematurely failing - sometimes "catastrophically."
@@bikdav I don't doubt it. They look like a ball of yarn under the hood
I have owned my 1966 Mustang 2+2 since 1975. in 2019 she got a complete rebuild with modern brakes etc. Still 200 KPH OSUNDS really fast even if in my younger days I did that with drum brakes. Thanks
That's amazing man. The Classic.
I like watching these German Autobahn videos where cars are going considerably faster than any highway in the United States. I am guessing that this classic 1966 Ford Mustang has a heavy duty radiator installed in it. This is because most cars of that era would overheat if driven at sustained high speeds with the original equipment radiator.
no
Having that car, no one needs to go fast. the important thing is to enjoy its beauty
It awsom!! Mustang really beast 💪. But the other side of medal I think to drive this muscle car on speed like this is like to kisses with tiger - 30% of pleasure and 70% of fear 😉. P.s. thank you very much for doing this for us, shaking your hand🤛
Any 60's cars would be dangerous
I don't feel like taking my eyes off him. Very nice area...
Thank you very much...👍👍👍👍👍👍
Dream car
IMPRESSIVE !. I was born that year . . . but not this agile now 😂
Excellent, je ne pensais pas qu’une mustang aussi ancienne marchait aussi vite, bravo.
My Dream! I ran a 1965 Mustang in SCCA racing for three years. Best i could do on road courses was about 130 MPH. This would be a phenomal experience.
Боже, как же это прекрасно, когда на таком автомобиле едут не 20 миль в час, ещё и в 2021 году :-)
Not a Lada
@@chuckwhitson654, чувак, ты знаешь, что Жигули это итальянская машина, а не русская?!
@@Серго248, нет нашинских. Прочитай про МЗМА, ГАЗ, ЗиС, ЗиЛ, УАЗ и т. д.
Sorry guys I'm not good enough with the Cyrillic alphabet to understand. Can you translate to English?
@@user-dm9Ih8bh9r I'm not good enough with the Cyrillic alphabet yet to understand can you please translate