Marvin Hagler vs. Gennady Golovkin: Fantasy fight predictions from the Mayweather Boxing Club
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2017
- Proudly sponsored by EpiPeppi.com. Check them out and get yours today! carefast.com/epi-peppi
Jeff Mayweather asks some of the guys inside the Mayweather Boxing Club what would have happened if Marvin Hagler and Gennady Golovkin fought in their primes
For sponsorship opportunities, please contact Amer@laceuppromotions.com
MORE FROM THE MAYWEATHERS!
GET YOUR MAYWEATHER MERCHANDISE
proboxinginsider.com/store/
TONS MORE VIDEOS & NEWS
www.proboxinginsider.com
SUBSCRIBE NOW FOR MORE BOXING VIDEOS!
/ mayweatherboxingchannel
LET'S CONNECT! (If it isn't listed on here, it isn't a real account)
Jeff's Boxing Site ► www.ProBoxingInsider.com
Facebook ►
Jeff: / proboxinginsider
Twitter ►
Jeff: / jeffmayweather1
Pinterest ► / pbinsider 
Спорт
![Skilla Baby - Misfit (Feat. Polo G) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IjsylSnNMyw/mqdefault.jpg)
please thank Jeff, cause when i have been severly depressed, his humour and character has helped thru hell. THANK U V MUCH JEFF MAYWEATHER. I LOVE U BRO
Haggler literally had a helmet for a skull he had an extra layer on his skull look into it its true iron jaw and granite head plus a boxing pedigree above most haggler was one of a kind.
True, even so I’m sure Tyson coulda put him on his back if landed right on the chin
Did the doctors tell him that?
@@vincemeyers2064 of course. ThAts mike tyson
Ggg has a strong chin too though
@@ceramikxxx5882 they measured his skull. ie the muscle on his temple was so thick, that it was like having a football helmet under his skin.
Serious fight but one thing is for sure, its going the distance... 2 Chins made of adamantium! Beasts!
Lol Marvin puts that joker out inside the distance
@@arster2935Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
video on my page compares a '80s Leonard to his last match, he also would advanced in early 00, then upgrade again maybe once in the mid which would be a small amount in 5 years than 5 more years and then 5 more years this is all if he started his career in late 90s, Hagler and every other 80s fighter would follow the same pattern if they fought for that long had they came in late 90s or early 00s
It's very obvious if srl had those same advances from 97 in his 80s he never would lose
Rip champ
Very odd people in a boxing gym picking a way to outdated person to beat a way more advanced one....
ggg is way more advanced and fluid than the whole 70s-80s its obvious he would win,anybody who watched full rounds of ggg and full matches of the 70s-80s can easily see ggg would win easily
What
A question where both answers can be agreed with
They had both Diamond of a Chin and great boxing skills, so its hard to know who will win
So who has ggg fought that was a hard puncher?? An Don’t say Canelo. His chin has never been tested and y’all hype him up
@@ascendediamjacobs gave GGG a tough fight, Hagler arguably beat sugar ray leonard (one of the greatest ever)
@@raulelblanco781 video on my page compares a '80s Leonard to his last match watch that, then delete this odd comment made to me as if it made any sense to make to me, and that was a 97 srl, he also would advanced in early 00, then upgrade again maybe once in the mid which would be a small amount in 5 years than 5 more years and then 5 more years this is all if he started his career in late 90s, Hagler and every other 80s fighter would follow the same pattern if they fought for that long had they came in late 90s or early 00s
@@arster2935 ggg fought way more advanced people so you make no sense at all,Hagler fought like a 80s type fighter
GGG IN HIS PRIME KO
No middleweight KOs hagler you muppet
Dream on!!!
Hell no 😂
in Yo dreams
@@disgruntledarmadillo6267Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
I think hagler is a better inside power puncher mixed with scrapping he's better at the heavy work inside game
He isn't better in anything fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Hagler hands down. He won against SRL but they called it for SRL.
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated 😊
I love both but GGG would win
Hell nah 😂 Marvin would work GGG
Lol delete this comment man
@@ascendediamGGG resume shows he’s never beaten any greats.
@@ascendediam GGG style is outdated, he’s not a pure boxer, he’s a come forward 1 dimensional puncher who puts pressure.
@@ascendediam obviously it does, that channel isn’t accurate, while pros have said Hagler beats GGG. I rather take it from them.
ggg by ko
The correct choice all people who say hag is a slow follower who doesn't watch full rounds,hags whole era was very basic compared to 90s let alone now
Fight film has a video comparing and hag basically looks like a amateur to how the average fighter fights now
It's really lunacy to pick a obviously outdated person to beat a way more advanced one
Nba/Soccer/baseball/Nascar/mma/tennis these sports have shown advances with from 70s-90s and then 90s-now on average
In none of these sports have the average person from a era 10 years in the past Been more advanced,that's not how it works,people become more advanced in future,they don't time travel from the past learn advances and travel back,that's basically what everyone is doing by picking hag
@@ascendediamnonsense. There many more layers for every kind of sport. But in this case - especially boxing: weak mentallity.
Todays era are filled with easy money, quick route to title shots, and shitload of exposure. In the old days you were literally hungry. Ypu fought for a loaf of bread. How many fights did ggg had before his title shot? Well hagler got a title shot in his 50th fight. And won the title in his 53rd fight. Anyway - just judge their styles and analise (because just claiming that every thing in boxing that matters is date, or fancy new equipment):
Ggg was slower, less mobile, less work rate and his great jab would almost never land on hagler who was a southpaw, but also the best switch fighter, was exceppent inside and outside, and would not move or back down by GGG punches. He faced hearns and migabi - both punch harder and ggg would not land big blows as often as these guys did.
Honestly - lets put aside this h2h match up - do you actually think this hw era is better than ali, frazier, foreman, norton?
Or do you actually think that todays welterweights are better, more proven and more skilled than hearns, leonard, duran, benitez?
If judging by your words - you do, and im personally surprised and do not think so.
There are better eras and weaker eras - regardless of date. Btw - many people say that this hw era is the worst one since the camera was invented.. im not sure i agree with this claim but to me its not that far from it.
And to me - the real lunacy is automatically picking a fighter because he is from a newer era. Its like your saying you pick joe joyce over joe louis or muhammad ali (which i hope you dont). Date is the last factor in a sport that brings figjters from hunger. Its mostly mentallity (or lack of it). Today these "fighters" are more concerned with their selfies, number of followers and cool stories. That is lunacy
@@eranliber5993 Srl vs. Duran full match, both are mostly brawling, they have their feet mostly when they throw shots planted right in front of their opponent, they usually throw shots with the same patterns, and they use angles but they aren't complex, a lot of times instead of using defense they brawl, they look hesitant a lot as unsure.
Also their feet movement is very sluggish/moving in straight lines
Every early-mid 80s fighter had multiple ways of this style it was all they knew,along with multiple other areas they were missing stuff even compared to the Average in 90s
No ggg style existed in the 80s. What you will find if you watch people who fought in all his matches is that you will find multiple people who fought with some stuff GG did. You won't find one person who did all of what GGG did, which makes your pick for Hagler invalid and odd.
You can't even name anybody as advanced as guys who didn't fight in the 80s; you're trolling the wrong person.
I see every outdated or updated technology and flaws of each era. Any words you say to me are a waste.
I can either keep destroying you or ignore you for trolling since you can't make me not see advances with the words you use. Words don't matter to me
You slow guys for some odd reason look at how legends did vs guys using tech and flaws of their era,I look at what exist from future era flaws and tech and compares,see the difference?
@@ascendediam alright brother. Good talk and you do seem very intelligent and open minded. Have a good one
Hagler would destroy GGG!! if GGG was afraid to search and destroy Canelo, imagine what he would of felt vs hagler with his granite chin, power and his non stop search and destroy approach. Hagler was a machine
Nobody is destroying GGG, GGG has great footwork, great durability, good power and he isn't easy to hit when he doesn't want to be hit.
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
yup hagler would win cos he was virtually impossible to knock out
@Rakshit Joshi but those 400 amateur fights only get you so far look what happened to lomachenko he had a lot of amateur fights but yet he still lost in the pros also hagglers boxing skills is underrated people forget how he can switch from Orthodox to southpaw
Tbf GGG is also nearly impossible to knock out. I definitely have Hagler winning the fight but it would definitely go the distance.
@@jonathanrobbins3300 He lost two fights. In one he was arguably robbed (and fouled non stop), in the other he fought 2-3 classes above his natural weight, against much bigger guys.
And he lost that fight because he didn't do enough early rounds. In a rematch he wins, imo.
@@calebcaleb9808Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Love watching Triple G fight but I think Marvin Hagler wins.
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
GGG would definitely go 15 with Hagler...50/50 fight.
Lol you don’t know shit about boxing..
@arster2935 Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Hagler never lost to anyone and never been knocked out Lenard ran from him staying retired until marvelous got older best pound for pound
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
The Marvelous One goes to sleep against no one. Someone might oupoint him. But GGG ain't that someone
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Triple G by KO
Never that
@@noahthedestroyer3294Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Hagler had a tough fight with hearns? He koed him in the 3rd rd.
Fight film hagler ggg shows hag is way to outdated
Hagler fucks any middleweights world up.
He barely beat Canelo
@@edwarddavis6214 golovkin past his prime and still stood toe to toe with a young prime canelo
Yea in his era only way to outdated to compete with 90s and now
Honestly think Hagler was too small
Same size as Canelo if not bigger
Hagler had a longer reach than tei0le g too, i think like a 75 or 76 inch
Not really sure how you think that. Same height, Hagler with a huge reach advantage and in better shape.
@@AidanCulverREAL people forget how he can switch to Orthodox to southpaw
just look at the video where they come up together,,, youll see at some point Hagler looks even bigger than golovkin
I see it being a Draw
I see you smoking something strong.
@josesoto9335 yup cause ggg is way to advanced
Both fighters are great. However, GGG is a great fighter of his time, I’d say Hagler is an all time great. Would be a war that rivals the greatest 3 rounds in boxing (hearns v hagler)
You people don't watch matches,hag and his whole era were very basic and flawed compared to 90s,let alone the 00s-now,hag would be destroyed 1st round
Those dudes look even worst than amateurs from the years I said,said as the 70s they look very basic and flawed even compared to 80s-90s
I have video of a fool saying how frazier would've been the best pressure fighter usky ever fought,vid on my page shows joe wasnt close to as advanced as a amateur pressure fighter Usky fought..... like stop picking these very dated fighters to give tough matches to people way more advanced than their whole era..
@@ascendediam it would be a war, both guys can throw caution to the wind. Haggler in my opinion beat Sugar Ray Leonard, who absolutely was an all time great. I didn’t say anything about Frazier vs Usyk, that’s a different can of worms. The skill level has gotten tremendously better, I tend to pick the more modern fighters in these fantasy fights, but GGG is more of an old school fighter anyway. I do watch matches, and when we make these predictions you have to adjust your thoughts based on the era. No way he is destroyed first round.
@@ascendediam the Usyk Frazier fight would expose too much of a gap in skills between now and then, I would absolutely pick Usyk. This is just a different fight.
@strubang6563 let's stop this now,answer this name the person who hag/duran/srl fought as advanced as the average 90s let alone 00s-now fighter,if you can't name mutiple fighters they fought as advanced as these guys,you're pick for hag is of a fiction version that never existed,all of you people play this make believe stuff like kids
Hag and his whole era the real versions of that whole 80s would be destroyed And fast by the average 90s-now they just are and were way more advanced
So it doesn't matter what you say
@strubang6563 I have a video on my page of a troll saying if usyk had fought frazier that Frazier would've been the best pressure fighter Usky fought,frazier wasnt even as advanced as the amateur usyk fought who was a pressure fighter,let alone derek who was a patient slugger pressure type,those 2 in that vid would've absolutely destroyed george and his whole era
I also have vid showing exposing another troll saying ace a no name wasn't more advanced than and wasn't the modern liston,liston looks horrible but lunatics for years said he would beat guys In 80s-now
Marvin Hagler by unanimous decision.
George and Mike as middleweights? Strange.
@dashauncarney9651 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time for his style in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
Ggg is the most overrated middleweight in history. Hagler destroys little g easily. Not even a competitive a fight. Hagler stops little g in 4 or 5.
Yeah your idols best win was against a garbage fighter. What does that make Canelo? Hagler beats both of them.
@@AlTarif canelo ain’t my idol lol
@@josesoto9335 Andre Ward is overrated as well. Only Canelo fans and Ward fans say Little G.
@@AlTarif he’s so overrated GGG clearly DUCKED HIM.
@@AlTariffightfilm shows Hagler was way to outdated so no
Ggg is winning. Ggg hits harder. That will be the biggest factor. Both can take punches like crazy. Both are tough mf's but ggg power will be the x factor.
Wrong Srl vs. Duran full match, both are mostly brawling, they have their feet mostly when they throw shots planted right in front of their opponent, they usually throw shots with the same patterns, and they use angles but they aren't complex, a lot of times instead of using defense they brawl, they look hesitant a lot as unsure.
Also their feet movement is very sluggish/moving in straight lines
These are the reason along with mutiple other outdated ways the 80s guys fought
Both are overrated,take Hearns off Marvins record and what do you got? Lost to a welterweight Sugar Ray,almost got beat by a old,fat Duran(lightweight),who’s Mugabi?a couple mediocre Brits,a draw with Vito Antofourmo,got beat by the Worm,and boxed and ran around Briscoe like he was afraid.Triple GGG stinks,tough plodder,that’s it,really couldn’t do anything with Canelo who moved up in weight.
Who have you fought dum ass
Stop trolling Hagler goat
Who's mugabi..? What are you on player
interesting points
Bennie Briscoe would beat GGG
A man who fought in 80s,good joke no fighter even In that era was as advanced as the average in 90s
Ggg beat people way more advanced than Ben was in amateur,it was no one like ggg in 80s