This is like saying Activa is late to the market ,we had scooters for four decades then, Bajaj was a great brand then. Or saying maruti 800 was late to the market by three decades. Bluesmart adds a complete different dimension to the ride Hailing business.
Good stuff. I postponed my car buying decision for almost 2 years bcoz of Blue Smart. After speaking to many drivers here are s few insights that might help: 1. Allot a car for at least 7 days to particular driver so that he/she have a sense of ownership to take batter care of the car. 2. Track maintenance issues flagged by driver and customer is fulfilled by the maintenance team, as that directly impacts customer experience 3. Find way to tuck the spare wheel in the boot to give more luggage space. 4. Tie up with malls where female drivers can use washroom while on road. 5. Track behaviour of hub managers with drivers, as a mistreated, upset driver can make fatal mistakes on road. Pl use your reach for a greater good. Happy to talk more.
So far my experience with BlueSmart services especially drivers as been absolutely top notcn. I think they arent able to catch up with the demand right now.
I don’t think so, "Disrupting" generally means causing a disturbance or interruption to a process, system, or situation. It involves breaking the normal flow or operation of something, often leading to significant changes or upheaval. For example, in business, "disrupting" an industry means introducing innovations that significantly alter how the industry operates.
Self driving is some distance away and it's not just a matter of developing the tech but also having access to the training info. Some time left before it becomes feasible in India.
@@aritragupta4182 well everything is a matter of time. Time is very relative. Tesla's have been collecting training data since inception, people always thinks it can drive there but not here but 99% of the core is similar. It should ba able to drive in mount everest if it gets its core right and we know that processing power and time are much better. Inference is big thing and they nailed it. I would say world would be diff in a couple of years
What I have seen is many blesmart cars are not maintained properly inspite of them being just 1 or 2 year old. Drivers doing overspeeding when customers are not present. Now the question comes for how many years will these ev cars can survive with drivers driving them rashly. Ola, uber cars are maintained well bcos drivers are owners. Uber ola only need to solve the commission problem which then will lower their cancellation rate and can take on blusmart. For a ev car to give ROI it needs to run 1.5lakh kms ( considering interest and driver salary and charging 20rs per km to customer) What would be the condition of battery and car post 1.5lakh kms? Plus u would need a massve team and infra to maintain charging stations. Not a great model.
Why you are so happy about it? Watching educational content which is not graphic intensive(such as learning about game development, video editing, graphics creations) make no sense at all, 4K consumes more battery.
Talk to actual customers, those who use these cabs. They have surge pricing. Peak hour rates. Cancelled bookings, just when you need a cab. I wonder if there is a regulatory authority to pull up these cabs. It's not about money, it's about trust, reliability and fair pricing.
@@arpitkumar2981 I have found otherwise. EV much better than ICE If we consider the grid usage in charging, the 100% coal scenario (worst case), the avg grid emissions as of 2020 was 614gCO2/kWh or 0.614gCO2/Wh An EV like Nexon can get efficiency of 120Wh/km An EV like Tiago can get even better at 100Wh/km By this calculation, a 100% coal powered Nexon EV has a running emission of 74gCO2/km. For Tiago EV it’s 62gCO2/km. For reference, you can check emissions of common Maruti cars, cars which are known for “kitna deti hai”. As rule of thumb, more mileage = less emissions All Maruti cars except baleno SHVS are above 100gCO2/km. Baleno makes the cut barely at 99.6gCO2/km. That’s when we counted 100% coal power. In reality only 60% is coal which puts nexon and Tiago at 44gCO2/km and 37gCO2/km. This is purely tailpipe to smokestack comparison As of today, EVs are 19% cleaner all things considered So before you say “but what about battery production”, remember that oil extraction uses electric/diesel pump. 40% of global shipping is just for oil and it’s derivatives, and refining again uses electric furnace or fossil fuel burning to generate heat for fractional distillation. Conservative estimates put oil refining alone at 2-3kWh/litre When you add all this to the mix, you’ll see why EVs are better (one time mining + 92% recycling efficiency) It’s oil extraction which must be compared with battery production as the logical analogue Crude oil and refined derivatives of oil make up 40% of global shipping by weight. Global shipping produced 646M tons CO2 in 2020 (IEA) 40% of that is 258.4M tCO2 or 258.4trillion gCO2 In same period, oil production was 93.9M barrels/day or 14390 Million L per day, or 5.45trillion L per year Methane flaring from oil rigs during the same period produced 269M ton CO2 or 269 trillion gCO2 Adjusted emission in gCO2/litre = 96.8gCO2/litre Applying the same to refining, at 614gCO2/kWh like the article assumes for the grid, is 1535gCO2/litre (assuming electric furnaces used for fractional distillation) in 100% coal power and for 60% coal this is 921gCO2/litre of oil. Now adding 96.8g from shipping ie 1018g. Out of this, roughly 40% becomes petrol. Net “emission backlog” = 407g/L (40% of 1018) When adjusted for mileage, the oil supply chain will be 19.4gCO2/km for Tiago (407/20) For a Tiago driven at 20kmpl for 1,60,000km, the emissions just from fuel supply chain (before being burnt) itself is 3096kgCO2 (3.1tons) before being filled in the tank itself. Battery production produces about 100kgCO2/kWh but the main point here is that this is a recyclable entity. An equivalent Tiago EV will cause 2.4 tons of CO2 emission for battery but the emission would be 3.1 tons for ICE during same use period, which is way higher than EV battery. Due to the oil extraction, refining and transport emissions. The breakeven can be calculated very simply through the intersection point of linear equations. First equation (2.4t for battery one time and 37g every km in current scenario) Second equation (2.4t for the battery and 61g every km when 100% coal) Third equation (0t for battery + 19.4g for oil supply chain every km driven + 100g for tailpipe every km driven) I’m using baleno SHVS tailpipe as reference for Tiago so it should be fair enough. All in all, the breakeven for Tiago is barely 30K km in current scenario (60%coal) and 40K km for worst case (100% coal) scenario
@@arpitkumar2981 If we consider the grid usage in charging, the 100% coal scenario (worst case), the avg grid emissions as of 2020 was 614gCO2/kWh or 0.614gCO2/Wh An EV like Nexon can get efficiency of 120Wh/km An EV like Tiago can get even better at 100Wh/km By this calculation, a 100% coal powered Nexon EV has a running emission of 74gCO2/km. For Tiago EV it’s 62gCO2/km. For reference, you can check emissions of common Maruti cars, cars which are known for “kitna deti hai”. As rule of thumb, more mileage = less emissions All Maruti cars except baleno SHVS are above 100gCO2/km. Baleno makes the cut barely at 99.6gCO2/km. That’s when we counted 100% coal power. In reality only 60% is coal which puts nexon and Tiago at 44gCO2/km and 37gCO2/km. This is purely tailpipe to smokestack comparison As of today, EVs are 19% cleaner all things considered So before you say “but what about battery production”, remember that oil extraction uses electric/diesel pump. 40% of global shipping is just for oil and it’s derivatives, and refining again uses electric furnace or fossil fuel burning to generate heat for fractional distillation. Conservative estimates put oil refining alone at 2-3kWh/litre When you add all this to the mix, you’ll see why EVs are better (one time mining + 92% recycling efficiency) It’s oil extraction which must be compared with battery production as the logical analogue Crude oil and refined derivatives of oil make up 40% of global shipping by weight. Global shipping produced 646M tons CO2 in 2020 (IEA) 40% of that is 258.4M tCO2 or 258.4trillion gCO2 In same period, oil production was 93.9M barrels/day or 14390 Million L per day, or 5.45trillion L per year Methane flaring from oil rigs during the same period produced 269M ton CO2 or 269 trillion gCO2 Adjusted emission in gCO2/litre = 96.8gCO2/litre Applying the same to refining, at 614gCO2/kWh like the article assumes for the grid, is 1535gCO2/litre (assuming electric furnaces used for fractional distillation) in 100% coal power and for 60% coal this is 921gCO2/litre of oil. Now adding 96.8g from shipping ie 1018g. Out of this, roughly 40% becomes petrol. Net “emission backlog” = 407g/L (40% of 1018) When adjusted for mileage, the oil supply chain will be 19.4gCO2/km for Tiago (407/20) For a Tiago driven at 20kmpl for 1,60,000km, the emissions just from fuel supply chain (before being burnt) itself is 3096kgCO2 (3.1tons) before being filled in the tank itself. Battery production produces about 100kgCO2/kWh but the main point here is that this is a recyclable entity. An equivalent Tiago EV will cause 2.4 tons of CO2 emission for battery but the emission would be 3.1 tons for ICE during same use period, which is way higher than EV battery. Due to the oil extraction, refining and transport emissions. The breakeven can be calculated very simply through the intersection point of linear equations. First equation (2.4t for battery one time and 37g every km in current scenario) Second equation (2.4t for the battery and 61g every km when 100% coal) Third equation (0t for battery + 19.4g for oil supply chain every km driven + 100g for tailpipe every km driven) I’m using baleno SHVS tailpipe as reference for Tiago so it should be fair enough. All in all, the breakeven for Tiago is barely 30K km in current scenario (60%coal) and 40K km for worst case (100% coal) scenario
Why did u show that Congress person who didn't do any thing for startup ecosystem in India ,they only demoted indian business .You could have shown real driver while telling about drivers .
@@arj- It's not about politics, but more about PR and soft power and psychological influence, you need to have that kind of thinking to be a great marketer or influencer, and that's what GrowthX did here perfectly...
🏆Access BluSmart Resource : growthx.cc/GX_BluSmart_GrowthModel
BlueSmart proving a point that starting late you can still win.
This is like saying Activa is late to the market ,we had scooters for four decades then, Bajaj was a great brand then.
Or saying maruti 800 was late to the market by three decades.
Bluesmart adds a complete different dimension to the ride
Hailing business.
Good stuff. I postponed my car buying decision for almost 2 years bcoz of Blue Smart. After speaking to many drivers here are s few insights that might help:
1. Allot a car for at least 7 days to particular driver so that he/she have a sense of ownership to take batter care of the car.
2. Track maintenance issues flagged by driver and customer is fulfilled by the maintenance team, as that directly impacts customer experience
3. Find way to tuck the spare wheel in the boot to give more luggage space.
4. Tie up with malls where female drivers can use washroom while on road.
5. Track behaviour of hub managers with drivers, as a mistreated, upset driver can make fatal mistakes on road.
Pl use your reach for a greater good. Happy to talk more.
BluSmart has become an absolute beast in Bengaluru 💙
It doesn’t cover all area and become beast 😂😂
So far my experience with BlueSmart services especially drivers as been absolutely top notcn. I think they arent able to catch up with the demand right now.
"Disrupting"... try diff titles
Who hurt you bro
I don’t think so,
"Disrupting" generally means causing a disturbance or interruption to a process, system, or situation. It involves breaking the normal flow or operation of something, often leading to significant changes or upheaval. For example, in business, "disrupting" an industry means introducing innovations that significantly alter how the industry operates.
Title ain't wrong bro. Many articles use "Destroying" btw 😂
Every second video on this channel has "disrupting" or "disrupted" in title which not very creative
Excellent Presentation... Thank you....
This sounds like a paid promotional video by BluSmart. You should have a disclosure about such paid gigs.
In Bengaluru it's too expensive & only provide ride to Airport.
Absolutely love the way you explain the growth of startups in your videos❤
Glad you like them!
That intro beats BluSmart's intro into the ride hailing space :)
I was feeling Blu today, and this video made me Smart.
can you tell that how you research for this episode and what is the way to connect you ?
Loving your wireframe series ,make an series on logistics and supply chain sector
Thanks, sure 💯
Need in Hyderabad too 🤯
Lovin these intros bois
Sir❤
loved the intro bois
dope intro. Loved it
They have limited severely to a part of Bengaluru and not expanding to other residential areas.
Revenue or net profit ??
Is it CapEx or KapeX ?
Hope the quality is maintained unlike ola and uber.
when are they coming to mumbai ?
Great video🎉
Stopped using ola and uber because of cancelation and stinking cars.
Dis is crazy insight i would invest in blu smart
Honestly i dont see them winning against great software. The ultimate race is the self driving ones and uber, ola aur tesla will be winning that.
Self driving is some distance away and it's not just a matter of developing the tech but also having access to the training info. Some time left before it becomes feasible in India.
@@aritragupta4182 well everything is a matter of time. Time is very relative. Tesla's have been collecting training data since inception, people always thinks it can drive there but not here but 99% of the core is similar. It should ba able to drive in mount everest if it gets its core right and we know that processing power and time are much better. Inference is big thing and they nailed it. I would say world would be diff in a couple of years
Very good intros❤
So insightful
Good content 👍
What I have seen is many blesmart cars are not maintained properly inspite of them being just 1 or 2 year old.
Drivers doing overspeeding when customers are not present.
Now the question comes for how many years will these ev cars can survive with drivers driving them rashly.
Ola, uber cars are maintained well bcos drivers are owners. Uber ola only need to solve the commission problem which then will lower their cancellation rate and can take on blusmart.
For a ev car to give ROI it needs to run 1.5lakh kms ( considering interest and driver salary and charging 20rs per km to customer)
What would be the condition of battery and car post 1.5lakh kms? Plus u would need a massve team and infra to maintain charging stations.
Not a great model.
jaggi brothers are smartttt mannnnn
In what universe? for most part it is as expensive as uber/ola. And having to book in advance is a pain!
I was thinking exactly the same. Ultimately India is a price sensitive market and customers are far from eco friendly (cab wise).
They need to use dmart strategy cover city near the current location n spread like a virus by multiplying more in same area
Snap cab in Kolkata is also great then Uber
4K option finally 🎉
Why you are so happy about it? Watching educational content which is not graphic intensive(such as learning about game development, video editing, graphics creations) make no sense at all, 4K consumes more battery.
I tried to book 2 times, disappointed
Great insights
💯
Rishi Sunak after losing elections....
Talk to actual customers, those who use these cabs. They have surge pricing. Peak hour rates. Cancelled bookings, just when you need a cab. I wonder if there is a regulatory authority to pull up these cabs. It's not about money, it's about trust, reliability and fair pricing.
Just check the percentage of people say all of things things
Less than 2%
I never faced such issues . Using blusmart from 2 years ago
Insights on steroids 💯
Not Bangalore .. it's Bengaluru 😊
EVs are not eco friendly. Get it in your head
proof or didn't happen. I can also spew random bs on internet
@@7567_Rex No spoonfeedding. Find out yourself.
@@arpitkumar2981 I have found otherwise. EV much better than ICE
If we consider the grid usage in charging, the 100% coal scenario (worst case), the avg grid emissions as of 2020 was 614gCO2/kWh or 0.614gCO2/Wh
An EV like Nexon can get efficiency of 120Wh/km
An EV like Tiago can get even better at 100Wh/km
By this calculation, a 100% coal powered Nexon EV has a running emission of 74gCO2/km.
For Tiago EV it’s 62gCO2/km.
For reference, you can check emissions of common Maruti cars, cars which are known for “kitna deti hai”. As rule of thumb, more mileage = less emissions
All Maruti cars except baleno SHVS are above 100gCO2/km. Baleno makes the cut barely at 99.6gCO2/km.
That’s when we counted 100% coal power. In reality only 60% is coal which puts nexon and Tiago at 44gCO2/km and 37gCO2/km.
This is purely tailpipe to smokestack comparison
As of today, EVs are 19% cleaner all things considered
So before you say “but what about battery production”, remember that oil extraction uses electric/diesel pump. 40% of global shipping is just for oil and it’s derivatives, and refining again uses electric furnace or fossil fuel burning to generate heat for fractional distillation. Conservative estimates put oil refining alone at 2-3kWh/litre
When you add all this to the mix, you’ll see why EVs are better (one time mining + 92% recycling efficiency)
It’s oil extraction which must be compared with battery production as the logical analogue
Crude oil and refined derivatives of oil make up 40% of global shipping by weight.
Global shipping produced 646M tons CO2 in 2020 (IEA) 40% of that is 258.4M tCO2 or 258.4trillion gCO2
In same period, oil production was 93.9M barrels/day or 14390 Million L per day, or 5.45trillion L per year
Methane flaring from oil rigs during the same period produced 269M ton CO2 or 269 trillion gCO2
Adjusted emission in gCO2/litre = 96.8gCO2/litre
Applying the same to refining, at 614gCO2/kWh like the article assumes for the grid, is 1535gCO2/litre (assuming electric furnaces used for fractional distillation) in 100% coal power and for 60% coal this is 921gCO2/litre of oil.
Now adding 96.8g from shipping ie 1018g.
Out of this, roughly 40% becomes petrol.
Net “emission backlog” = 407g/L (40% of 1018)
When adjusted for mileage, the oil supply chain will be 19.4gCO2/km for Tiago (407/20)
For a Tiago driven at 20kmpl for 1,60,000km, the emissions just from fuel supply chain (before being burnt) itself is 3096kgCO2 (3.1tons) before being filled in the tank itself.
Battery production produces about 100kgCO2/kWh but the main point here is that this is a recyclable entity. An equivalent Tiago EV will cause 2.4 tons of CO2 emission for battery but the emission would be 3.1 tons for ICE during same use period, which is way higher than EV battery. Due to the oil extraction, refining and transport emissions.
The breakeven can be calculated very simply through the intersection point of linear equations.
First equation (2.4t for battery one time and 37g every km in current scenario)
Second equation (2.4t for the battery and 61g every km when 100% coal)
Third equation (0t for battery + 19.4g for oil supply chain every km driven + 100g for tailpipe every km driven)
I’m using baleno SHVS tailpipe as reference for Tiago so it should be fair enough.
All in all, the breakeven for Tiago is barely 30K km in current scenario (60%coal) and 40K km for worst case (100% coal) scenario
@@arpitkumar2981 If we consider the grid usage in charging, the 100% coal scenario (worst case), the avg grid emissions as of 2020 was 614gCO2/kWh or 0.614gCO2/Wh
An EV like Nexon can get efficiency of 120Wh/km
An EV like Tiago can get even better at 100Wh/km
By this calculation, a 100% coal powered Nexon EV has a running emission of 74gCO2/km.
For Tiago EV it’s 62gCO2/km.
For reference, you can check emissions of common Maruti cars, cars which are known for “kitna deti hai”. As rule of thumb, more mileage = less emissions
All Maruti cars except baleno SHVS are above 100gCO2/km. Baleno makes the cut barely at 99.6gCO2/km.
That’s when we counted 100% coal power. In reality only 60% is coal which puts nexon and Tiago at 44gCO2/km and 37gCO2/km.
This is purely tailpipe to smokestack comparison
As of today, EVs are 19% cleaner all things considered
So before you say “but what about battery production”, remember that oil extraction uses electric/diesel pump. 40% of global shipping is just for oil and it’s derivatives, and refining again uses electric furnace or fossil fuel burning to generate heat for fractional distillation. Conservative estimates put oil refining alone at 2-3kWh/litre
When you add all this to the mix, you’ll see why EVs are better (one time mining + 92% recycling efficiency)
It’s oil extraction which must be compared with battery production as the logical analogue
Crude oil and refined derivatives of oil make up 40% of global shipping by weight.
Global shipping produced 646M tons CO2 in 2020 (IEA) 40% of that is 258.4M tCO2 or 258.4trillion gCO2
In same period, oil production was 93.9M barrels/day or 14390 Million L per day, or 5.45trillion L per year
Methane flaring from oil rigs during the same period produced 269M ton CO2 or 269 trillion gCO2
Adjusted emission in gCO2/litre = 96.8gCO2/litre
Applying the same to refining, at 614gCO2/kWh like the article assumes for the grid, is 1535gCO2/litre (assuming electric furnaces used for fractional distillation) in 100% coal power and for 60% coal this is 921gCO2/litre of oil.
Now adding 96.8g from shipping ie 1018g.
Out of this, roughly 40% becomes petrol. Net “emission backlog” = 407g/L (40% of 1018)
When adjusted for mileage, the oil supply chain will be 19.4gCO2/km for Tiago (407/20)
For a Tiago driven at 20kmpl for 1,60,000km, the emissions just from fuel supply chain (before being burnt) itself is 3096kgCO2 (3.1tons) before being filled in the tank itself.
Battery production produces about 100kgCO2/kWh but the main point here is that this is a recyclable entity. An equivalent Tiago EV will cause 2.4 tons of CO2 emission for battery but the emission would be 3.1 tons for ICE during same use period, which is way higher than EV battery. Due to the oil extraction, refining and transport emissions.
The breakeven can be calculated very simply through the intersection point of linear equations.
First equation (2.4t for battery one time and 37g every km in current scenario)
Second equation (2.4t for the battery and 61g every km when 100% coal)
Third equation (0t for battery + 19.4g for oil supply chain every km driven + 100g for tailpipe every km driven)
I’m using baleno SHVS tailpipe as reference for Tiago so it should be fair enough.
All in all, the breakeven for Tiago is barely 30K km in current scenario (60%coal) and 40K km for worst case (100% coal) scenario
Now don't ask me for links, no spoonfeeding, find yourself what I've said is true or not. Else be ready to accept yourself as hypocrite
u seem 2 copy thinkschool.
lol at @13:05 you have used a picture of Chicago for Delhi. Do fix it
3:34 balak budhi 😂
❤🎉
Pehli bar naam sun raha hu
Why did u show that Congress person who didn't do any thing for startup ecosystem in India ,they only demoted indian business .You could have shown real driver while telling about drivers .
@GrowthX if u can't appreciate and recognise some ones work who has created this ecosystem then don't demote them .
He smartly tried to sneak in his photo to spread soft propaganda.
Rise above politics for once in your life
@@arj- It's not about politics, but more about PR and soft power and psychological influence, you need to have that kind of thinking to be a great marketer or influencer, and that's what GrowthX did here perfectly...
don’t cry SANGHI
You need to understand what “disruption” really means
Who hurt you
Just wait and watch. The fundamentals of BluSmart are strong unlike still loss making Ola & Uber