The Greatest Human Win Over a Chess Engine

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 июн 2024
  • An incredible chess game where the legendary David Bronstein, known for his immense imagination and creativity, challenges one of the strongest computer chess engines of his time, Fidelity.
    In this game, Bronstein demonstrates his romantic and artistic style. Right in the opening, he sacrifices material to activate his pieces and seize the initiative, and throughout the whole game, he keeps the engine under relentless pressure.
    1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 Be7 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nxe4 6.Ne5 Ng5 7.d4 d6 8.Nd3 f3 9.Be3 Bg4 10.Kd2 fxg2 11.Qxg4 gxh1=Q 12.Rxh1 c6 13.Re1 h6 14.d5 Qd7 15.Qg3 Qf5 16.Nf4 cxd5 17.Bxd5 Nc6 18.Qg2 Rc8 19.Rf1 Nb4 20.Bb3 Qd7 21.a3 d5 22.Bd4 Nc6 23.Bg1 d4 24.Ncd5 d3 25.Nxd3 Na5 26.Ba2 b6 27.h4 Ne6 28.Ne5 Qa4 29.Kc1 Qxh4 30.Nxf7 O-O 31.Qg6 Bg5+ 32.Kb1 Qh3 33.Rf6 Rce8 34.b4 Qh1 35.Rf1 Nc6 36.Bc4 Qh3 37.Bd3 Qxf1+ 38.Bxf1 Rxf7 39.Bd3 Nf8 40.Qxc6 Re1+ 41.Ka2 Rxg1 42.Nc3 Kh8 43.Qe8 Rf2 44.Ne4 Rf3 45.Nd6 Rf6 46.Nf7+ Kg8 47.Bc4 b5 48.Qxb5 Rxf7 49.Qf5 Bf6 50.Qd5 Kh7 51.Qxf7 1-0

Комментарии • 32

  • @ilucian2792
    @ilucian2792 Месяц назад +6

    What a beautiful game! Thanks for it!

  • @mcronrn
    @mcronrn Месяц назад +4

    Great game! Brave choice by DB to play the KG! 👏👏

  • @largin386
    @largin386 Месяц назад +4

    I hate computer chess to no end, kudos to Bronstein!

    • @aqswd6825
      @aqswd6825 Месяц назад

      What's wrong with computer chess?

    • @largin386
      @largin386 Месяц назад +3

      @@aqswd6825 I mainly hate the influence engines have had on human chessplay. Games have become more centered around opening theory than actual planning and strategy. You have to learn variations that can be over 40 moves, such as in complex openings like the Poisoned Pawn variation of the Sicilian Najdorf. There are actual drawing lines now, constructed not through human ingenuity and experimentation, but raw, soulless computer analysis. Players don’t lean into individual play styles anymore because they always want to emulate computers. I despise computer chess because of what it has done to human chess.

  • @Enpassantful
    @Enpassantful Месяц назад +2

    Incredible insight into to exactly what is happening at all times.

  • @keithwhittington1322
    @keithwhittington1322 Месяц назад +2

    What a game! Thanks.

  • @dirkhebgeennaamachter9056
    @dirkhebgeennaamachter9056 Месяц назад +1

    How nice, I have the Pre designed predecessor of this chipset from 1987 in the super nine high fidelity chess engine

  • @juliuspons818
    @juliuspons818 Месяц назад +1

    In these king's gambit positions you have to play very ressourceful and precise to not fall behind. You can't play with direct tactical threats the whole game. For example Bronstein recognized that he had time to twice change the position of his white-squared bishop. And in other positions he knew that it's time for very difficult precise moves. Fantastic timing and understandig. I admire Bronstein. It would be a dream to play a game like this.

  • @williamblake7386
    @williamblake7386 Месяц назад +2

    And he called the opponent "iron idiot" after the game. Or it was another game?
    Pretty sure it was Bronstein vs some computer.

  • @zithromaxzomax4610
    @zithromaxzomax4610 Месяц назад +1

    it's bronstein the machine !!

  • @victorfranca85
    @victorfranca85 Месяц назад +1

    One day ill make “computer” resign 🎉

  • @jpr4747
    @jpr4747 Месяц назад +1

    Prodigious !

  • @CapybaraChess2006
    @CapybaraChess2006 Месяц назад +6

    Oh the age when engines could still lose to humans, nowadays anyone with a smartphone and no moral compass can beat Magnus

    • @victorfranca85
      @victorfranca85 Месяц назад +1

      Just lower the ranking. Its perfectly enjoyable if you place it on reasonable elo

  • @LeslieMilligan
    @LeslieMilligan Месяц назад +1

    Why not just show the game, for any sake!

  • @marcinsocha1500
    @marcinsocha1500 Месяц назад +1

    Who is the engine?

  • @gaopinghu7332
    @gaopinghu7332 Месяц назад +1

    How good was Fidelity at the time?

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk Месяц назад +1

      In 1991 probably IM strength.

    • @gaopinghu7332
      @gaopinghu7332 Месяц назад +1

      @@dannygjk ok, thanks.

  • @seblubla1685
    @seblubla1685 Месяц назад +2

    The greatest victory of a human against a computer is fools-mating martin in 4

  • @pedrosotomayor5480
    @pedrosotomayor5480 Месяц назад +1

    Save button not working ???

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  Месяц назад +1

      As far as I know, it works.

  • @TruthSurge
    @TruthSurge Месяц назад +2

    1991 haha that chess program was probably 2100 rating. Wait another 10 years and then see if he could beat a chess engine on highest level. Deep Blue was rated around 2800 give or take then latest stockfish is 3600 something.

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk Месяц назад +1

      Certainly better than 2100.

    • @TruthSurge
      @TruthSurge Месяц назад +2

      @@dannygjk wikipedia says that engine "reached a max rating of 2325". Now, not sure if that means after more years of tweaking or in 1991. But okay, 2325 is prob GM level back then. I don't know but one thing I do know is that he wouldn't crush Stockfish today - artistically or otherwise. :)

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk Месяц назад +1

      @@TruthSurge 2325 is IM level (if 2325 Elo).

    • @TruthSurge
      @TruthSurge Месяц назад

      @@dannygjk okay. But 2325 in 1991 might be 2500 today. No? I don't know. Just saying that beating a chess algorithm in 1991 wasn't a shocking thing. Beating Stockfish on highest level WOULD BE a shocking thing. That's all I'm saying.

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk Месяц назад

      @@TruthSurge The inflation hasn't been that high but true it is significant especially since Arpad Elo stepped down as administrator.