CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims "
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 мар 2024
- CJI Shocked Sibal Remark ; Hindu Came Not Muslims " #lawchakra #analysis #supremecourtofindia
#SeniorAdvocateKapilSibal Represent Assam NRC
Follow us on Twitter:- / lawchakra
Follow us on Whatsapp : whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5...
Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakras
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Let Sibbal go and live in any Muslim dominated areas within India!
Hope, he'd be able to live freely
Outside india. As per his argument if Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslims should be accepted in India, am sure he should be happily accepted in these countries
Send him to old city in Hyderabad. He will forget all the arguments
He will go to tihar someday
@@khyatikothari4492and we shall send u to Uganda 🇺🇬
@@najmulhaque3716 How can truth send bad message. He is only speaking truth.
Repeating The Well Said Quote :
"Sound Is Measured In Decibels, Nonsense Is Measured In Kapilsibals".
😂..
Who said this.
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Sibbal is arguing exactly the opposite of what he argued in Art.370. At that time he argued that Kashmir has its own culture language etc which shouldn't be diluted and now he says states shouldn't object if their demography changes.
He is doing his job , he paid for that
That is what lawyers do.
@@purabi123 Yes, Lawyers are only ones who can professionaly lie legally.
Every time he loses, but he keeps fighting against India, to keep his job intact.
Sibal is talking nonsense . Hindu Bengali and other ethnic Hindu minorities wanted to migrate to India and not Muslim.
lol
@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnbcoz of religious persecussion in bangladesh
@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pnBecause this is their right, when the country was divided in the name of religion, then all Hindus are citizens of India, not you.
@@ShahrukhKhan-kk9pn Because Muslims already have 57 countries but Hindus not and a piece of land as a beg had already been gifted to Muslims and this is the country of Hindus only.
@@indraneelsarkar85902because India is democratic and secular country that doesn't represent any religion ..
By your logic Sikh and other minorities should have their own country isn't it 🤡
How much hatred Sibal has for Hindus... It shocks my mind to no end
Kapil sibal is just a puppet, he reports to Congress high command which hates Hindus to the core
Not hindus, only andaybhakt
@@7vj7ik and you are Chatukaar 😅
@@israelimanashe8608 tu bi 🤣🤣
He hates Hindus not andhbhakt @@7vj7ik
Our country was divided on the basis of religion, now you cannot question us when we protect those who were left behind.
I am happy all of this is now live and we can listen and know what goes in the minds of these people.. sic
East Pakistanis were Indians till 1971? Wow! What an argument!! Speechless...
Confidently lying. They created Pakistan. They werePakistanis . Not indians. They were foreigners. Or why india was divided? They didn't want to be Indians. They consider being muslim their identity. They dont consider being bengali or indian their identity. Why two nation theory if they considered themselves Indians? Explain
Foolish argument absolutely wasteing valuable time of Hon'ble SC
Badti Umar ke sath insaan thoda sanak jaata hai, whi horaha hai
@@baldbonkers7246 🤣🤣
Funny argument.. if they are to be considered as Indians, then can we take back the whole Pakistan ? including the land.. if so, I think we can agree.. same with West Bengal too..
Kapil Sybil is not aware that East Pakistan was already another country in 1971.
Bangladesh
East Pakistan formed in 1947 , in 1971 Bangladesh is formed.
He knows but lying is his habit
He knows but just trying to confuse The judges
Aagaya antimuslim
कपिल जी से पूछना चाहिए कि हिन्दु कहां से आये थे,महाभारत,रामायण से मिल रहे सबूत क्या बताते है इसलिए आपका वक्तव्य तथ्य हीन है
Well said
1:00 Mahabharata and Ramayana are mythical . The two mythical stories were written by the Aryans who had passed into India through Khyber pass from the steppes of Iran and who were nomads , to facilitate themselves to show that they are the superior race . Do not juxtapose Hinduism with those two mythical stories. The coinage ' Hindu ' came into existence about 200 years , more particularly after the entry into the Indian shores - the East India Company. 😊😊😊
Hats off to our CJI. .. point to point counter citing constitution.. where as Sibal takks about Historical points..
Enemies within are more treacherous than the Enemy at the gates.
who are you in this world?
@@jj-yi1newhat point you trying to make by asking who is he....what is he saying is completely fact.... people who are celebrating the funeral of a terrorist or mafia....are always be a enemy for country
This guy is typical of Congress mindset. Why blame him? He was born & brought up there in Congress.
So u consider the minority muslims ur enemy?
You sound like you don’t like facts.
Sibal should never be allowed to practice as lawyer.
😂😂
Why?
WTF is he saying - 'they were Indians in 1971?????
100% correct. Through out from court Y CJI LISTENING HIS WORD
His practice should be cancelled.
क्या बात कर रहे हैं यह साहब ?? अंग्रेजी में दलील करी तो किसी को समझेगा नहीं क्या?? हम कायदा अनपढ है फिर भी समजते हैं, यह अब और बेवकूफ नहीं बना सकते.. CJI साहब के सहनशीलता को प्रणाम 🙏🏻
Ye sab humko bewkuf banate hai jo aam aadmi smjh ske waisi bhasha kyu nahi apnate , justice sirf bde logo aur paise walo ki hai English bolne walo ki hai
All this debate shows that a lawyer can present the facts in either ways, according to the case he is advocating for !! Such people like Kapil sibal are above their consciousness !!
सिब्बल को हिंदू विरोधी और देश विरोधी बयानों के लिये सभी न्यायालयों में क्यों नहीं प्रतिबंधित कर दिया जाना चाहिए।
He knows this
Court bhi liberalism aur secularism ke naam per Hinduo se bhed-bhaav karta hai.
@@H2B2Dसिर्फ़ बीजेपी को वोट दो वो सारा कचरा साफ़ कर देगी ।एकदम सब कुछ वो नहीं कर सकती ,लेकिन अगले पाँच सालो में देश में बड़े बड़े बदलाव होने तय है ।
Need guts or both R one coin ❓
माननीय टीम के चुनाव माननीय ही करते हैं
Sibal with all his antihindu mindset,tried to put forth his arguments in such a convincing way that nobody can deny..but ,CJI is equally strongly putting forth his points..a decent way to stop the anti hindu undercurrent..hats of to you sir 💐💐
Sibal is simply bullshitting (again) using word salad. Articulate but still bullshit
Sibal. is not anti-Hindu however, he is a learned knowledgeable Hindu and very well aware of India and its History.
@@treesajohnson6321but he is underestimating the populace....this can cause riots..where mikkions of minorities will massacred ...no one can stop public.
He's not anti hindu, just another guy chasing the money.
Convincing ❌ conniving ✔️
CJI is humbly requested not give any hearing of Adv Sibal
Sibal will change his father for money. He must barred to enter courts across the country.
That's undemocratic and against free speech.
This is a comedy show, if we silence him, life would become too boring.
Sibal is going out of his mind. I totally bewildered by his statements.
Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah
The point is what is Bengali
After the forming of Pakistan then Bangladesh occur
If they considered themselves bengalis, why partition happened? They were Muslims first
No they were not indians
He has to do something for the fund he received from the jihadis, at least bark
@@induchopra3014 if bangladeshis r bengalis then pakistanis r punjabis -- then whats the need for another country? He is arguing comparing language to country 🙄.
He should be charged for wasting precious time of the court. Old guy has gone nuts.
7:50 "1971 was second partition of India" सिब्बल बोला 😂😅😂😅😂😅😝🤪😜🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅
Ghar ke dushman, bahar ke dushman se zyada khatarnaak hote hei.
Sibbal has no words to say. He is beating about bush.
Beating around the bush.
@@Somd55typo hoga bhai..
You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.
@@smitaswarup8562copy pasting the same comment sans any logic. He's trying to give the constitutional rights to immigrants on the grounds of undivided India? He is talking utter nonsense. There was east Pakistan already in existence prior to 1971. And ofc he's throwing the Assam accord out of the window. Fool!
He is trying for Law Jihad
My lord, Sibbal has gone mad, his place is in mental asylum and not in the court.
Sanghis,
Bajrang Dal, Moblyncher, Tadipaar have place in court!!!
@@salamindia5148 yes, and the butchers of humanity who kill others in name of BHAICHARA behind the bars of the prison 😂🤔😂
@@salamindia5148religion of pieces spreading piece in Russia..
Ambedkar ji ne kaha h ki ysdi bharat kabhi hindu rastra nahi ban sakta...yadi esa hota h to wo desh ka durbhagya hoga
Kyuki Hindu dharm me lengik bhedbhav jatigat bhedbhav h samanta nahi h
Samvidhan nirmata ambedkar ji ❤❤
@@salamindia5148rohinga😂
Enemies within the country are more dangerous than external enemies.. Like him siblu
What about the Muslims stayed back in 1947 and not send to Pak under the agreement of populatin exchange
This man Sibal thinks that we are all fools! He is trying to confuse the justices by mangling the Indian constitution and history!
You do not know, Const is a living one. It is to be studied in context of history and circumstances. You people need to have a civics lesson. Sibal is a grt constl expert.
How will CJ get confused..he will not..he knows Sibal very well
@@smitaswarup8562and yet he lost the argument ... you people should understand constitution is the for the people of India not for the people who made decision at 1947 ... if they want to enter into India ... only GOI has the almighty power to decide ... not Sibal or SC its a simple understanding
leave bhai. you can't argue with people who only follow what one book says...@@udayhotshot
@@ikp5159😂😂😂
This type of lawyers very dangerous to country....
He is good but not sangi
@@shasha2022-bo5yw he is traitor Mf
@@shasha2022-bo5yw he is not sanghi and he is supported by anti Hindu mindset. This is a shameful fact.
What have you understood by the discussion adhe bhakt
Kyu ki yeh lawyer muslim se nafrat nhi krte na. Jo muslim ko support karega wo dangerous. Jo muslim se nafrat karega wo accha
I just didn't have patience to hear his argument... Kudos to the judges that they heard him and didn't throw him out of the court
I never thought in "supreme court" also lawyers present blabbered answers as we do in viva when not prepared
Sir you are enough for us. We don't need enemies outside of India.
Don't call him Sir. He don't deserve any respect.
I agree
These types of hipocratic lawyers are dangerous for our country. He is not a lawyer, but a liar
Do U mean cji.they seems to agree at the end.
bring sudanshu trivedi against sibal. sibal might be moghal son, they forget to take him, now lets hindhus become shivaji, and send him out of india. partition was done on religion india is hindhu country.
This is not court room, this is lecture hall😂😂
Only lecture , no any questions & answers😂
all supreme court hearings should be put in
public domain each and every hearing
I am an Indian. I became American citizen . I surrender my Indian passport . Now I want to come back to India. Now I will have to apply for Indian citizenship. Then it is up to Indian government to decide whether to give me citizenship or not. Same thing apply to all other foreigners.
Its not the same thing... You left the country ... The people being denied citizenship in the region of Bengal underwent partition and bore becoming refugee against their will.
If you dont have common sense enough to comprehenx what is being discussed, dont blabber ur mouth.
It's different because many could not come to India during partition... India's partition was declared overnight and many could not come back to India. It is accepted by Congress themselves it was a blunder ...MMS himself said in parliament we must do something for the minority in Pakistan...congress sometime forgets what they spoke in past 😅
@@Rahul_Singh100 In constitution of India it is written that people that came during partition can have refugees citizenship but in this remark by sibal he state that India partition took place on 14 August and only Pakistan got independent but Bangladesh citizens can have right to move to Indian which is wrong it is written in treaty that Bangladesh will join Pakistani which contradiction the statement by sibbal
@@Sakshameditz27 Bangladesh became East Pakistan on 14 August, 1947 and the Partition of Bengal was possibly worse than that of Punjab. Trainloads of Hindus were being massacred and many were too scared to cross the border as news of violence in West Bengal was equally bad. Also, as in Sindh some were too poor to even attempt to walk across the land and cross the border. But Sibal is deliberately muddling the facts by saying that Bangladesh became an independent country in 1971 and therefore was part of united India before that. During this period we did get a large influx of migrants from East Pakistan who were escaping the Pakistan army and they got assimilated among the "minority" community in India.
When u have traitors within ur own country then u dont need any enemy from outside...sibbal is an example
Mat bhulo Electoral Bond ko inhone hi expose kiya hai.
@@Shivamsharma_cgly to hindu ko target karne ka hak mil gya kya ise fir??
Exactly!!
@@Shivamsharma_cgly 47% BJP other have 53% so if it's unethical then why not other refused all donation?
BJP national party have 6k+ cr and 2nd one who in only one state have they have 1.6k+ cr.
Before it cash was scam brother.
👌👌👌👌very well said 👍👍👍
How sibble became Advocate😅😅😅
These people ruled our country for decades. The system was so rotten, no wonder India was so behind. Not anymore.
CJI shud have thrown this Sibal endemic out of the court. Listening to this man's blasphemy is a waste of court's time.
Bhai sahab don't forget about direct action day
Pakistan ka matlab kya la ilaha illallah
CJI and sibbal are birds of the same feathers. Any thing that appears otherwise is smokescreen to hoodwink viewers to affect difference of opinion
Are you sure you don't like him because of logic, or because of inexplicable hatred towards a group ?
Bhai dekh simple baat hai please look at the electoral capacity of Muslim league when it got elected in 1940s 98.4 % vote
Then then their claims which got converted into mosque
Then dear majority areas where they have their own personal management
In three districts of India there are no Hindu and Hindu rituals are allowed
Then I don't know where are you from but if you are from Bengal then you must have remembered that how the Sultan of Bengal played with virgin women
The same way sandesh Khali happened
Kerala is the very secular state that because they celebrate olam you have to eat beef
When people are doing it then it shows the problem within it
I am not saying Muslim the bad but 85% of the population of Muslims want their laws
Then how they throw a stone that Hindu festivals
So if you think that then why should not be take Pakistan Afghanistan and Afghanistan Muslim and Bangladesh Muslims this is the same reason because they have separated from a bike killing our people
Hindu Shahi rulers of Afghanistan
Sindhi and Punjabi of Pakistan
Bangladeshi Hindu the treating like dust
Sorry but we have lo st so much of a territory we don't want to lose another
@@arifabdgive 10 honest reson not to doubt you people. Book teaching everybody knows truth.
The supreme court is very patient to hear Kapil Sibal
Both are part of the eco system established by Congress and left.
Yes they of course, they should... And after all, Sibal's making valid points that the preservation and safeguard of a regional culture from immigration is not a right in India (although this is the guy who used to vouch and simp for the Article 370)
My point is, the parliament should make a new right for preservation of culture... Tab dekhte hai ye kya bolte hai 🙃
@@janvijaysingh2692He isn't making valid points, after 1947 there was Pakistan and India. After 1971 there was Pakistan, Bangladesh and India so those people are of different nationality not Indians.
@@hrishabhjoshi5847 I don't think so you even watched the video. What I'm talking about is migration within India. As such, people of other regions of India move into a state, thus gaining a stake in the say in the state's politics and policies. This also conflicts with the predominant culture in those states, as immigrants bring in their own culture.
And we Indians are tought in 7th or 8th grade, about the right to migration within the country...
Some north eastern states do have 6th Schedule, but several others don't. Even States like Ladakh, J&K, Uttarakhand, Himanchal don't have any such safeguard. And thus Sibal's right in saying that there's no legal grounds for a state (most states) or its community to plead to court about preventing influx of migrants from any part of India (though he's pretty wrong when saying that Bangladeshis have a right to migrate within India+Bangladesh, its pretty funny😂)
Tough subject, due to invaders since 800 years looting, plundering and forcing Sanstani Hindus to convert.
Good dicison by tha suprime cort
And that person was once law minister of india
It was a bad joke for our country. He spoiled everything with his dirty mind
😂😂
Even he himself know that he is beating about bush. But he want to continue to dabate on topic and money will continue to flow in form of his fees 😂
Shocking
What a nightmare that must be !!
I belong to the same ethnicity of Mr. Sibbal and Indian also like sibbal. So I am son of Mr Sibbal. Kindly give me your whole wealth now bcz I am your legal heir😊
perfect point
Perfect superb sibal should know this 👏👏👏👌👌👌👌👌
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wonderful point.👌👌👌
Logic 🔥🔥
Rightly-put
Sibal please understand the difference between undivided India and present India... only fundamental rights applicable to the citizens of India
Lately Kapil Sibbal developed a habbit of taking every case to Supreme Court, whether constitutional or unconstitutional, and waste courts time.
He should be barred from practicing and must be thrown out of govt residence too.
He is getting paid by Pappu
Yes, he cultivated a strong affiliation with Supreme Court
The Court can't function without pleader like Sibal and Singhvi, the collective charm, mindset has come to this point
Hindus also wasting time of court by bringing unnecessary allegations of existence of hindu temples every where, we have better things to look into, but no according to your shraddha every Muslim house are built on a temple 👌👌
Why is supreme court entertaining these cases. Tells a lot about CJI himself
@@ptbb23 Bro...if he is against these type of time wasting cases....Pappus will cry and again "protest" again across India saying democracy died because no one is fighting for their illiterate views
he never argues with legal methods, he only confuses and irreverent things and make people to forget the original case
While acknowledging the historical context of migrations pre-1947 and the subsequent legal framework, it's important to consider the nuanced perspectives encapsulated within the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and constitutional articles. The migratory patterns from 1914 and the conception of India as a cohesive entity before partition indeed underscore a certain fluidity in national identity. However, it's also crucial to delve into the intricacies of post-partition legal amendments and the formation of new nation-states like Bangladesh in 1971.
The dynamic nature of legal interpretations, especially in matters of migration and citizenship, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of constitutional amendments and international legal precedents. This complexity is not a reflection of the intelligence or acumen of legal authorities but rather a testament to the multifaceted nature of jurisprudence and historical evolution.
Therefore, when examining migratory patterns and their legal implications, it's imperative to navigate through the layers of legal frameworks with due diligence and a nuanced approach. This ensures a holistic understanding of the complexities involved, avoiding oversimplification and acknowledging the legal expertise and considerations at play in the highest courts of India.
The historical backdrop highlights ongoing migrations since 1914, which can be viewed as a natural phenomenon. Prior to 1947, individuals were identified as Indians, enjoying the liberty to relocate within the country. This freedom of movement was enshrined in the legal framework, permitting Indians to settle in any part of India until August 15, 1947. Post-partition, individuals retained the right to migrate under the Indian Constitution, thereby maintaining their Indian identity.
The creation of Bangladesh in 1971, marking its separation from Pakistan, further underscores the application of relevant laws to its populace. These legal principles were subsequently amended in 1978 to accommodate evolving circumstances. It's essential to grasp this context to avoid misconceptions regarding the competency of esteemed legal authorities such as the Chief Justices and lawyers at India's apex court.
Ignoring the prejudices, Such high level intellectual discussions. The winner is the democracy in India 🫡
Honorable CHIEF JUSTICE IS LISTENING AND RIGHTLY POINTED OUT EVERY POINT OF SIBBAL SIR...SUCH AN EXAMPLE OF PRACTICING LAW AND JUDICIARY TAKING THE STAND ...SATYAMEVA JAYATE
Esa h to cji h cm arresting ke case ke sath etni laperwahi kyun ki. Esi female judge ko case diya jo gujrat aur pm modi se related h.
Akhir h to ye bhi pichle 4 cji ke kafi close... Ab yakin nhi Kiya ja sakta sc highcourt per bhi ..... Na election commission per.. democracy to khatam ho hi gai samjo.
@@himanshukashyap8763Aaaaa
In SC Sibbal Will Not Win The Case CAAWill Reman Continu
@@himanshukashyap8763Ed ne supreme Cort me evidences submit kiye hai and Ed 14 days ke liye cm ko custoday me rather saktii haii
Read about it.......
DO YOU KNOW ZINHAS 16 AUG 46 DIRECT ACTION DAY
THESE IN BLACK COATS
ARE ADDRESDING CONCERN IN FAVOUR OF ZINHAS DIRECT ACTION DAY
SIBBAL WAS PART OF CONGRESS THAT DESTROYED ASSAM CULTURE BY IMPORTING FROM BANHKADESH FOR VOTE BANK
Sibal is very confident that We bhartiye people are fools, With the elected govts of Congress in the past he settled this idea in his mind 😮
He thinks he alone knows history. Which Bangladeshis consider himself indian? Zero
अयसा लगता है सिब्बल जैसे सपोले भारत से गये क्यू नहीं 😂😂😂
And you should know this sibbal guy is a big leader in Congress party... He lead the case against RAm Mandir.
I have never seen a hypocrite lawyer like Sibal, he change his argument as per his suitability. Ask for J&K he will change immediately.
Advocacy is literally representing your client’s stance.
@@prachim_😂
@@prachim_yeh client stance kiska banagldeshi logon ne isko hire kiya hai
@@prachim_ Client's stance? here he is trying to deny the Petitionare by using his twisted logic of, Assam should not blame it's dilution of culture on demographic change while in Art 370 case, he said demographic change will destroy thr J&K culture. it's hypocracy more than anything else
@@Delllatitude7490 he's arguing for the side he is representing. That is what advocacy is. Exactly how A criminal lawyer may represent prosecution in one case and the defendant in the other. He does not become a hypocrite for using the same logic to his own end.
Sibal misled Congress on 2G,Educatioal policy and now CAA, dont waste court time and confuse the issue just to prolonge.
this is the case of optimum utilisation of courts time
Congress created Pakistan for Muslims in India.
And now they are saying ,Muslims had a choice to go to Pak but they stayed.
The Truth is Pakistan was created after overwhelming vote in support of Partition by Indian Muslims in all muslim constituencies , and when they voted ,the borders were not decided..
So every Indian Muslim voted with expectation that his area will come under Pakistan .
It's really sad to listen to Mr Sibel. How could our judiciary kept listening. He should have been snapped. He Spoke nonsense only.
Although I am with you on the broader issue, I have to point out that your suggestion is absolutely undemocratic. In a fair justice system, everyone is entitled to be heard, which means both the right and the wrong and a judgment must be passed declaring one side or the other triumphant and founded on reasoning. What would be the point of a system wherein only those whom you think are right get to speak and not the ones who are wrong? Then there would not remain any distinction before the eyes of the public, "usko bolne mat do" is not justice.
Coz we Indians love empty talk!
same Kapil Sibal was arguing against abolition of article 370 citing Kashmir is not fully an integral part of India.
These wolfs are highly paid by anti-india elements paise ko liye yeh apni biwi ko bech de desh kya chij hai.. when you're taking about patriotism these wolfs never bark,
Kapil sibal is the reason, India needs to careful with enemies within our country.
My forefathers are sufferers of the partition and making of Bangladesh from East Pakistan as Hindus.
An Indian as in undivided India does not make a person an Indian by default in divided India as well. He is completely and intentionally wrong.
I was shacked with the kapil sibbal arguments, when he said they means Bangladeshi were Indians. Even the CJI Raised the same question. Before 1971, it was east Pakistan, and not India.,which was partioned in 1947. Immigrants before 1971 are migrated from east Pakistan, then how can they be Indians. On 16th Dec 1971 Bangladesh was formed.
Sibballs argument is gold ..and very deep...cji initially didn't get it..
Fool sibal may argue that there's no Hindus ever
it was east pakistan
How can sibbal say that before Bangladesh formed, they were Indians. They were East Pakistanis before becoming Bangladeshis.
@@humbleh5085 they were forced to be East Pakistani...when India and Pakistan seperated their was great influx of Bengali speaking Hindus as well as Muslims from east pakistan...but government was forced to issue permit for Muslims coming to India ..only 2000 permits were released per month ..while before those permits 25000+ Muslims were moving to India...while Hindus had no restrictions...they all were Bengali first ... and they didn't know Urdu ...one reason why east and Pakistan seperated was because of imposition of Urdu over east pakistan giving people of west pakistan unnecessary advantage...thats another reason why South India opposes imposition of Hindi over them.
Honourable justice is rightly questioning They can migrate only in India, not from other country….
This the .5 war that late General Bipin Rawat was referring to.
India's IB must up the game and root these Hinduphobic traitors out
Kick out sibbal from the court room
Migration within country is a fundamental right says Sibal. But he was also arguing for restoration of Art 370 and 35 A.
What is wrong in it.... Abrrogation of article was illegal...
Supreme court said it's legal..😅😂
@@user-ti4hh2qz9s foreign rreligion called iislamb is responsible for division of iindia therefore this foreign idealogy should be banned from iindia.
Had abrogation of 370 been illegal then supreme court would have said so.@@user-ti4hh2qz9s
Mad can say any thing, goat can eat any thing. Never mind.
Sibal wasted SC time in article 370. Now here too in CAA is wasting. How CJI is permitted such arguments to take place? He should be barred from bar
Bar council and not from bar. Woh bar, bar bar jaye. Hamen kaa haani?!
CJI's patience perhaps to show the public that learned fools do exist and that too within the Bar Limits.
2:47 The same is applicable to Kashmir also.
I have to watch this in full video for better understanding.
Why is sibal even allowed in court, such a wastage of court's time😂
Correct he is speaking stupid arguments wasting court's time.
EXACTLY SO!
Listening skills ✅ and speaking skill of CJI 🔥🔥
The problem with this country,it too diverse.Barring south India,where education level is high& there is a sence of unity.Education have inculcated of feeling of pride& value addition.The intelligent adminstration has ushered a better understanding of good governance.There is sence of affinity.The afrosaid highlights are sadly lacking in rest of the country.thus given too an un qualified religiosity.The education level is poor.Thus the misconceptation on progressive lite is missing.There is a sence of insecurities pre
vails.Thus the depednese on multipule gods& goddess.Hence the polarization is easitest. Therefore belief on Hindutva.Blind hero worshipping has culminated their backwardness.
S
S
@@utpalroy1972don't talk nonsense when you don't have any idea about South India..
@@manognyak6474😊👏
In family partition if two houses are there , in joint family all were living in one house . Once the partition takes place , one family got the existing house should only stay and the one got another house should only go their house . They cannot say I lived in that house on the day of partition , so I will live here and ask for equal right . Is it right my learned lawyer Mr Sibal sir ?
इसे क्या कहें। जिहादी है ये छुपा हुआ।
Question: how far will u go to be labelled anti hindu and anti national?
Kapil sibal: yes.
Good arguments and discussions. After Sibal and his arguments are proved wrong, the anti CAA brigade will not have anything left to say legally.
I think it is time to send sibal with family in pakistan or bangladesh then he realized actually who need shelter in india.
सत गुण, रचो गुण, तमो गुण. ये तीन गुणों के अनुसार सब कुछ चलते हैं। चलने दो, भगवान दख लेयेगा।
Kindly don't confuse between Sat/ Tam and
Dharma/Adharma.
Nahi to aap bhi Tatashtha me hi gine jaayenge🙏🏻🙏🏻
It's surprising that Sibel tried to fool all the judiciary and sad part t
And the judiciary is trying to be a
fool.😜bcoz both are part of the eco system established by Congress and Leftists.
sibal openly lies in court too. no accountability. why? does perjury law exits in India?
You think those corrupt political crooks would stand by and not call him ? You just don’t like facts.
any context for the above argument? likewise what is the case about?
Will provide going forward in the video.
Who made this guy a lawyer and how is he practicing. He should just be ignored and should be declared head of fools.
I have saw once his brother interview who was former diplomat of our country who is completely opposite of him knows the importance of national security but this guy such a disgrace
अगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे कपिल सिब्बल,
प्रशांत भूषण जेसे लोग है ।जो देश
विरोधी लोगो के लिए लड़ते है इनकी
प्रॉपर्टी की जांच होनी चाहिए और कोर्ट
की कारवाई हिन्दी मे होनी चाहिए ताकी
कोर्ट के मक्करो को जनता समझ सके ।
Right
Yahi to locha hai
Gandhi (Bhimrao Ambedkar) ne constitution English me hi likhvaya tha, vo nhi chahte the ki unki tarah koi raaj kare isliye sab kuchh English me
@@teresenahopayega1894 because english is global language. South Indian opposes hindi
This fellow sibal should b sent to Bangladesh or Pakistan. How can he argue like this, especially when he claims to b an Indian. Who is paying him the fee is a big question
Umar ho gayi upar jaane ki😊😊😊😊😊
सिब्बल, सिंगवी, प्रशांत भूषण ऐसे वकीलों पार जांच एजेंसीओं को नजर रखने की जरुरत है की इन लोगों को फंडिंग कौन करता है, जो हमेशा आतंकवादी, माउबादी ओर देश विरोधी लोगों का ही मुकदमा लड़ता है l
Right
इन लोगों ने वह शिक्षा हासिल की है जो आपको जिंदगी में कभी नहीं मिली। ये लोग संविधान का पालन करना जानते हैं, आपके तरह नहीं जो किसी एक पार्टी के विचार से प्रभावित होकर देश को धर्म के नाम पर बांटे।
In ko jaha Paisa jyada milta hai ye waha khadey ho jatey hain aur Funding kin key paas jyada hai ye sab ko maloom hai.
@@user-fp3sp9iw5c
Aisi hi Shiksha Gandhi Nahru aur Jinnah ko mili thi jis ki wajah sey Lakho log marey gayey. Neta Ji, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Udham Singh, Madan Lal Dhingra, Verr Savarkar aur Sardar Patel ney aisi mahaan Shiksha nahi li isi liye unhoney Desh key liye apna jeevan arpan kar diya.
@@user-fp3sp9iw5c
Partition Religion key basis par hua tha, is ki demand Muslims ney ki thi aur Pakistan sey Minorities ko khatam karney ka kaam turant hi shuru kar diya tha aur ab yahi kaam Bangladesh mey cbal raha hai is liye faltu ki Shiksha aur Samvidhan ka rona roney ki jaroorat nahi hai. Abhi kitney Article hain pooch liya to batti gul ho jayegi.
How is this guy even a lawyer..
Art of argument is mostly based on-
1. If Law in your favour.
2.if Facts in your favour.
3. Create a mix-up of both when none is in your favour and create doubt.
He told the truth.. So some soft corner will be there towards the ancestral atmosphere..
I am neither a law student nor understand the practice of law but the way the Argument is being held and the decent exchange of words between MR Sibal and Hon. CJI gives me thought to my own attitude.Like how we can present our thought point and Argument in our daily life when we are in Public forum.Lots of learning on History ,language, law and constitution from this argument.Kudos to the Law Chakra team for bringing this out.
Yes Bro….. amazing
It s truely told that law is an ass
It's the Supreme Court of India. Were you expecting Bollywood like court proceedings?
Don’t be naive. The CJI is listening patiently to a senile lawyer claiming that East Pakistanis were Indians between day of Independence & 1971 war.
@@loveearthly He claimed that the minority linguistic groups living in East Pakistan were originally from India, as they belonging to the undivided Indian subcontinent and thats the truth.
A total argument with history, law and constitution. A lesson for lawyers, who want to come-up in their career
Yes
Should take a class to the MP & MINISTER'S OF THE ALL PARTY
CJI is taking care what he talks and what he answers because he has to report to the PM
while SIBAL has a point in what he talks...
both of them should be for the people...of the people...and by the people (irrespective of the caste and religion)
. and NOT of the PM...
it's very important..
😅😅😅
@@josephdsouza1515 for the people of nation...
And also accepting an majority religion from neighbour, is an foolishness foe sure.
Or let there be a law... that land, more tax and their surety should be given by the people who support them especially the majority religion from neighbour.
If this happen not even sibal accept them
👍👍
बकबाश कर रह है। इसके हिस्ट्री नहीं है। कोर्ट का टाइम वेस्ट कर रहा है।
We cannot compromise with National security at any point of time. We support CAA & NRC👍🏻
In1947 IT was partition of India but in 1971 it was partition of Pakisthan and not of India as said by Adv.Sibble
Those two people know. Still they say like that.
Listen to 8:09 Adv Sibal corrected himself by saying second partition of Pakistan.
@@yasishq1826 😂😂
In 1971, Bangladesh should would have joined India as a state as we own the war at the cost of Indian blood.
Correct. This intelligent crook is trying to confuse the people. What happened in 1971 was not 2nd partion of India. It was a partition of Pakistan, where we had a stake being in between and had to face lot of disruptions. Kapil Sibal is a crook.
Saddest part is he was our law minister 🤬
बस एक ही उल्लू/गद्दार काफी है , बर्बादी के लिए
It is a shame for judges listening to such non sense without stopping the lawyer talking such non sense.