Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 авг 2023
  • Article 370 Hearing, 370 Will End, CJI Tutors Sibal #SupremeCourtIndia #LawChakra
    Visit Our Website:- lawchakra.in/
    Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
    #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
    Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
    Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
    Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
    For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
    #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
    #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
    *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
    🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
    @Lawchakra
    👉Twitter
    / lawchakra
    👉 Instagram.
    / lawchakras
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

Комментарии • 827

  • @ParikhTirth
    @ParikhTirth 9 месяцев назад +260

    The fact is Amit Shah and team has done the job so flawlessly that no arguments are worthy enough to reverse the decision... Amit Shah in his reply confidently spoke that there is no way this can be reversed

  • @chittaranjandas7140
    @chittaranjandas7140 9 месяцев назад +568

    Sibal feels he can create technical ambiguity and twist the case on his favour but
    Honble Judges are alao equal careful.

    • @suvarnanaik8261
      @suvarnanaik8261 9 месяцев назад +3

      😂👍

    • @Surihampi
      @Surihampi 9 месяцев назад +30

      Honorable Judges are not only careful but they are brilliant and impartial. This is why when everything fails to do justice, we believe in Honorable Courts for justice. Hats off to them.

    • @ubaidarshad
      @ubaidarshad 9 месяцев назад +2

      @@Surihampiwhat is justice according to you

    • @positive120
      @positive120 9 месяцев назад +7

      ​@@ubaidarshadmake people to abide by laws framed by democratically elected
      Indian govt.

    • @cccc2740
      @cccc2740 9 месяцев назад +3

      @@ubaidarshad 70 year old not being able to 6 year old girl..first point of justice...

  • @asrajan2489
    @asrajan2489 9 месяцев назад +254

    Mr. Sibal confuses to the maximum. Honourable Judges should be very careful in dealing with him.

    • @bahdeng5588
      @bahdeng5588 9 месяцев назад +6

      No, Mr. Sibal is 100℅ right.

    • @dalinaik9996
      @dalinaik9996 9 месяцев назад +11

      Anti nation sibal

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi 9 месяцев назад +1

      Subal said what's in the constitution, centre can't make Uttar Pradesh as union territory just because they don't like ppl there, same goes for jNk, ppl should decide.

    • @AnilSharma-vo8ok
      @AnilSharma-vo8ok 9 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@deepakkumarjoshi for you kind information J&k is not UT.

  • @digvijaysingh2305
    @digvijaysingh2305 9 месяцев назад +237

    Sibal is down to the level of "Chahe mujhe pitt do, lekin gariyao mat".
    😂😂😂

  • @gvija69
    @gvija69 9 месяцев назад +152

    These two lawyers Sibal and Singhvi are like Imran Khan. They are fighting cases for so many people and on other side making congress weak by weak day by day.
    Good work for BJP

    • @ismail3901
      @ismail3901 9 месяцев назад +3

      They r fighting in behalf of Pakistan

    • @vikashbkj
      @vikashbkj 9 месяцев назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @manoharshirsat2864
      @manoharshirsat2864 9 месяцев назад +4

      😂😂They earn Congress looses

  • @rocketsingh4830
    @rocketsingh4830 9 месяцев назад +146

    What a waste of time by a senior sc lawyer once in congress, habits don't go easily 😂😂😂

  • @dhrdas
    @dhrdas 9 месяцев назад +329

    Congress created the problem in Kashmir. Half of Kashmir was lost due to negligence of Neheru, Neheru went to UN and made it an international dispute, Neheru did not change Article 370 neither Indira Gandhi did although she almost changed the entire constitution. Now when the the temporary article is removed, Congress is again creating trouble to bring it back. What Congress really want?

    • @paapkishtwaer
      @paapkishtwaer 9 месяцев назад +9

      modi came to power in2014. how much pok taken back ????

    • @AnkitSingh-zm9dg
      @AnkitSingh-zm9dg 9 месяцев назад +79

      @@paapkishtwaerpappu jaisi bate mat kar bro… it cannot be taken back unless UN intervenes, bcz pappu k nehru ne apni marayi ja k UN me… muh ka kaur ni hai ki le lenge… Army can capture it anytime they want but cannot bcz we have not to attack first policy… understand the logics..

    • @raghavendravishwas5929
      @raghavendravishwas5929 9 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@paapkishtwaer👌

    • @abhinavgoswami9574
      @abhinavgoswami9574 9 месяцев назад +31

      ​@@paapkishtwaerHow to say I am immature without saying it...

    • @TheKrish1972
      @TheKrish1972 9 месяцев назад +21

      @@paapkishtwaer in my view, there is no need to get POK because we get 4m more peaceful in this process. As long as there is not killing in Kashmir and life is normal, I am happy. 😂

  • @sidhainsan1
    @sidhainsan1 9 месяцев назад +163

    Sibal is stuck between temporary and permanent.
    Everyday he is changing his stand.
    For this he charges 25-30 lac per hearing.
    Kismet ho to Natthulal jaisi

    • @ads7506
      @ads7506 9 месяцев назад +17

      He has habit of getting stuck

    • @nagarampasulamogili3912
      @nagarampasulamogili3912 9 месяцев назад +4

      In view of non existence of constitutional assembly of J&K as of now the temporary status of Artcle 370 will become permanently temporary and it will continue to be applicable.

    • @suvarnanaik8261
      @suvarnanaik8261 9 месяцев назад +1

      😂👍

    • @damon5517
      @damon5517 9 месяцев назад +5

      😂😂😂😂 Congress ☕☕☕

    • @nikshrivastava5514
      @nikshrivastava5514 9 месяцев назад +2

      He thinks he can justify his fees by misleading judges.

  • @Antharishk
    @Antharishk 9 месяцев назад +120

    The 370 and Sheik abdulla a gone case. Why so much seriousness on this issue. Why sibal wants Kashmir burning again

    • @dhkw007
      @dhkw007 9 месяцев назад +21

      To make some money. He also knows the result

    • @Saqib_weqyq
      @Saqib_weqyq 9 месяцев назад +2

      If it is injustice it will not happen,
      If its justice then it must happen without worrying about further consequences
      Truth must revealed

    • @ishiinghajput1230
      @ishiinghajput1230 9 месяцев назад +13

      @@Saqib_weqyq what injustice, injustice happens with kashmiri pandits did you admit and re habilate them no you wants to make kashmir apart of pakistans it will never happen and poi will back soon

    • @VijayKumar-76
      @VijayKumar-76 9 месяцев назад +1

      Who is fighting for what? Who is on whose side and what this is all for.... Pls someone could explain me
      .. ty

    • @Ashish-rf2eh
      @Ashish-rf2eh 9 месяцев назад +9

      @@Saqib_weqyq original victims are kamiri pandit not muslim

  • @hanumanthrao3465
    @hanumanthrao3465 9 месяцев назад +168

    I feel like Sibbal is pleading the judges to give him a face saving from this embarrassment.....atleast once say "here you are right Sibbal" but...

    • @user-ci6vk8iy5f
      @user-ci6vk8iy5f 9 месяцев назад +12

      Agreed. That is why .he keeps saying “ Milords “ after every sentence hoping that the esteemed judges will sympathise with him and rule in his favour. 😂

    • @nageshlali
      @nageshlali 9 месяцев назад +5

      Sibal is arguing the case as if he is arguing in a Bail matter very very POOR SHOW

    • @esasidharan6573
      @esasidharan6573 9 месяцев назад

      😅

  • @chatrukripalani7671
    @chatrukripalani7671 9 месяцев назад +207

    Mr Sibal should clarify whether J&K is an integral part of India? If yes, then, how come, it can have its own constitution, national flag, and a prime minister. In that case Mr Sibal should explain why should India have the responsibility of protecting, feeding, and incurring financial expenditure in its development, yet have no authority to protect its own safety and security, and of Hindus living there?

    • @somashreechowdhury2382
      @somashreechowdhury2382 9 месяцев назад +7

      Exact"?"ly so that's exactly what the" messiah,of the santidoot international gang" have to answer,"". Also every

    • @kumark214
      @kumark214 9 месяцев назад +6

      Isn’t it obvious? Because it was given special status by India, just like Assam, Sikkim etc.

    • @somashreechowdhury2382
      @somashreechowdhury2382 9 месяцев назад

      Also every legislation and Articles ,Amendments,proviso,additions,to the Constitution are to be read with the appeasement scenario in which such proviso ,amendments additions,legislations were laid by & under the governance of a govt. as we gather from The history had been headed by Mr. Nehru who did not have a single of the 16 "VOTES" of the representatives representing the people of BHARAT and as such are imperatively questionable????And therefore such proviso, acts, Articles, legislations ,need neccessarily&imperatively be read with such history of appeasement & power sharing formulas that were the cause of such provisos , legislations, amendments , additions outrageous to the sanctity of the power of the government elected

    • @kumark214
      @kumark214 9 месяцев назад +2

      @@somashreechowdhury2382 complete nonsense. Regardless of who is in power, constitution is the same. Anything can be done if allowed by constitution, if not it’s illegal like this repeal.

    • @XPERTEDUCATOR
      @XPERTEDUCATOR 9 месяцев назад +1

      Not integral part but temporary part

  • @subramaniampanchacharam9438
    @subramaniampanchacharam9438 9 месяцев назад +101

    Sibal's argument-- if you keep stolen items long enough, then it becomes your property. Humbug arguments. Fiction.

    • @madhusoodananunniyattil9421
      @madhusoodananunniyattil9421 9 месяцев назад +7

      If these guys comes to power, then imagine the situation of India : Let alone Kashmir and Ladakh

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@madhusoodananunniyattil9421like the current situation in the china border 😂

  • @sagarviswanathan1956
    @sagarviswanathan1956 9 месяцев назад +74

    Sibal is fighting for money and nothing else. He knows that his argument is hollow and he will only face failure. For Sibal temporary provision can be permanent 😂. How much money he has taken to fight this case which he will lose without a doubt.

  • @pandit-jee-bihar
    @pandit-jee-bihar 9 месяцев назад +36

    Sibal wants 370 to stay not because it's abrogation he deem was unconstitutional but because there is no clarity on when and how a temporary provision became permanent.
    Looks like it became permanent on it's own without exercising 368 because no government said anything till date.
    I think such cases should be dismissed simply based on Article 1, 2 & 3 which gives centre enough power to parliament to reorganise or change the boundaries of any state without state's consent.

  • @suryavaliveti8355
    @suryavaliveti8355 9 месяцев назад +34

    He's testing their patience. They will strike down this petition soon.

    • @ranapartap1501
      @ranapartap1501 9 месяцев назад +1

      hopefully they send him to jail for 50 years for wasting time and Jhangerssi suer

  • @RS-sx1lo
    @RS-sx1lo 9 месяцев назад +21

    The logic is simple
    J&K is happier and more peaceful now !
    370 has to go !

  • @RajeevAnand
    @RajeevAnand 9 месяцев назад +33

    Sibal needs to take english classes again if he doesn't understand the basic difference between temporary and permanent. This will be a good judgement to also remove caste based reservations which was also temporary.

    • @vinayakdhulap
      @vinayakdhulap 9 месяцев назад +1

      The National Conference and the like think that they will always have the dine in and India will take care of the washing and kitchen.Then they were worried of their minority status and reservation. Whats wrong if we say let's all be at the dinner table and enjoy?All states are equal for last 76 years and prosperous.

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw 9 месяцев назад +1

      You have a case there! Bravo!!

  • @leelaaiyappa6277
    @leelaaiyappa6277 9 месяцев назад +11

    Well replied by CJI👍

  • @divyasatheesh2529
    @divyasatheesh2529 9 месяцев назад +21

    Precious court time got wasted!!! CJI should not encourage this.still thousands of laymen are waiting for justice. But nowadays I feel that SC favours VIPs..they are ready to take political cases that too of opposition mostly even at midnight.

  • @AnandSharma-qt3gi
    @AnandSharma-qt3gi 9 месяцев назад +73

    Sibbal knows how to exploit loopholes of Constitution by intrepreting it so subjectively.. But judges should be ekadiken ( one step more)

    • @Saumil5
      @Saumil5 9 месяцев назад +2

      Shukracharya hay

  • @lasu596
    @lasu596 9 месяцев назад +43

    Sibal lost the case
    He dint hv anything to say except what Abdulla wanted

  • @subash32118
    @subash32118 9 месяцев назад +48

    HOW MUCH ANTI INDIAN LOBBY IS WORKING IN INDIA

  • @nikshrivastava5514
    @nikshrivastava5514 9 месяцев назад +24

    After hearing all the arguments of CJI. It is clear that sibal is just wasting time of the court and acting like a stubborn child that keep on ranting without logic to prove his point.

  • @vandemataram2506
    @vandemataram2506 9 месяцев назад +35

    After 100/200 years, people will remember Kapil as a Villain Advocate in History!!!

    • @ListenSilent121
      @ListenSilent121 9 месяцев назад

      🎯

    • @bahdeng5588
      @bahdeng5588 9 месяцев назад

      Ater 100/200 yrs people will remember kabil not as villain but as Hero (advocate)like kapil indian cricketer.

  • @susilkumarbarik8304
    @susilkumarbarik8304 9 месяцев назад +40

    Advocate like sibal not only confusing honorable SC but also betry indians and this is the true face of Congress....

  • @manjunathaks607
    @manjunathaks607 9 месяцев назад +49

    Sibal is famous for confusing Indian courts by doing China and Pakistani laws in India..😂

  • @prakashnarasimha1044
    @prakashnarasimha1044 9 месяцев назад +26

    Sibal was heard suggesting Brexit like vote for the people of J & K. I wonder what kind of man is this and what kind of mentality is this ?

  • @user-ks1lj4uz2j
    @user-ks1lj4uz2j 9 месяцев назад +74

    Sibal feels, J&K is part of Pakistan, he even feels India to be part of Pakistan too.
    but he wants Indian money, that too in crores per every day of his attendance in court/parliament.

    • @petergriffin6575
      @petergriffin6575 9 месяцев назад +3

      Have u ever read law?

    • @megacharizardx2276
      @megacharizardx2276 9 месяцев назад +7

      ​@@petergriffin6575Plz explain what is a law I'm an law student.
      Sibbal comparing UK & India but he forgets in UK there is no Reservation system SC St Obc doesn't enjoy job food dress from tax payers money is there any equality between UK & India?

    • @petergriffin6575
      @petergriffin6575 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@megacharizardx2276 considering u r a law student let me give u a piece of advice that a lawyer should always see loopholes in the case and argue them and twist the facts to favour him.
      It's not necessary to provide only facts.

    • @user-ks1lj4uz2j
      @user-ks1lj4uz2j 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@petergriffin6575 In general sense yes, articles from here and there, cannot say as expert, My comment is not about law, about a person. As a lawyer he may be doing good, his argument struck like Gramaphone needle at one place, he do not want the judges to even debate/venture into other relevant points. if this is what law is, then i do not subscribe to it, my understanding is law should be for greater good not for one or select few!

    • @karma5396
      @karma5396 9 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@petergriffin6575does exploiting loophole strengthen our democracy? Asking as a lay man with zero understanding of Constitution.

  • @sayand2706
    @sayand2706 9 месяцев назад +6

    Sibal is going round and round but CJI called out his bluff ..

  • @grpublishers
    @grpublishers 2 месяца назад +2

    Chief Justice should be the role model of our youngsters rather than some chapri influencers.... Look how humble je is and how convincingly he talks.....

  • @nimmamithra-learning7647
    @nimmamithra-learning7647 9 месяцев назад +17

    Sibal's procrastination is at the height of his obedience to dynasty.

  • @mazerrackham1280
    @mazerrackham1280 9 месяцев назад +67

    As a Kashmiri i have always rejoiced the 370 abrogation since it was nothing but a dead horse and most probably SC will uphold the abrogation as well. What i fail to understand is why is it irking so many people. The deliberations upon it in the highest court only reflects the true character of Indian democracy and the fact that arbitary legislations are liable to be struck down if passed in an illegitimate manner. If you ask me the proceedings itself is enhancing the democratic spirit of the country rather than doing any harm.

    • @miskangan986
      @miskangan986 9 месяцев назад +1

      Mal gudood

    • @malayaranjansahu7650
      @malayaranjansahu7650 9 месяцев назад +4

      same bro...i don't understand why...may be this gives us hint that what national prosperity & security means to these people who are represented by sibal.

    • @Aj.K.R
      @Aj.K.R 9 месяцев назад +2

      We love constitution Democracy and Supreme court. We are not biased and court as well to hear any significant cases. Sibbal is trying his best argument. Law is important than your emotions. Law makes a country not an uneducated King.

    • @malayaranjansahu7650
      @malayaranjansahu7650 9 месяцев назад +4

      @@Aj.K.R but is it good to waste time on a sealed case which was needed for the security of India???

    • @ydgokhale1
      @ydgokhale1 9 месяцев назад

      Great point.

  • @raghavuchil2098
    @raghavuchil2098 9 месяцев назад +36

    Why we are still folowing British way of addressing judges as " My Lord" ? As per Indian tradition, we must call them at the best " Your Honor" Calling them My Lord makes no sense. Only Lord for us is our Gods and no one else...

    • @sigmamale3115
      @sigmamale3115 9 месяцев назад +2

      Judge k samne jra bolna ye baat....juban se pocha na lgwa dia th wo bhi judge ni

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi 9 месяцев назад

      But do you want to use? Old caste based way of addressing?

  • @nadieperumal5770
    @nadieperumal5770 9 месяцев назад +8

    \\One thing is for sure: No going Back

  • @VipinSingh-vg8iq
    @VipinSingh-vg8iq 9 месяцев назад +11

    it feels so sad that we are hearing this kind cases being accepted in the courts of our country that challenges the authority of our country over our own state. Sibal is appearing for some anti-India client here, court shouldn't have accepted the Plea in the first place.
    It's a wastage of taxpayers hard earned money and resources. Moreover, it further raises question on the non-transparent model of working of the judiciary itself.

  • @pawanballi
    @pawanballi 9 месяцев назад +4

    No law supreme than country.....
    Always first nation...... Law should be changed according to the need and conditions of the country....

    • @truthexposed4403
      @truthexposed4403 9 месяцев назад

      Country is for the people who want to be governed by themselves by their choices,not by foreigners or any intruders who autocratically break their laws made for the govern.first human being then country then law it is the actual sequence.

  • @ramalingamsadasivan2835
    @ramalingamsadasivan2835 9 месяцев назад +7

    How can a politician become a lwayer, conflict of interest.

  • @swagbaba69
    @swagbaba69 9 месяцев назад +3

    I never saw this lawyer ever fighting for good of nation

  • @jatmartial
    @jatmartial 9 месяцев назад +24

    We don't need British for dividing India. British mindset is present in the blood of these advocates and their masters who are so inclined to break Kashmir away from India.

    • @kmrao06
      @kmrao06 9 месяцев назад +5

      ​@@Faizan39318: You look ti be another legal luminary like sibal. Pl enlighten me if the British Parliament revokes India Independence Act, will we become British subjects again!!😂😂

    • @AmitSingh-ez5is
      @AmitSingh-ez5is 9 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@Faizan39318Aa gya Auranzab ko pujne wala 🤣🤓

    • @ads7506
      @ads7506 9 месяцев назад

      Congress is the instrument of British.

    • @chiragcapri
      @chiragcapri 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@Faizan39318Indian Independence Act was not made with aim of India acceding to Britain to have its own rights, which is the case in J&K.

    • @chiragcapri
      @chiragcapri 9 месяцев назад

      @@Faizan39318 I was pointing out a different thing. Independent India was not formed with an aim for it to accede to Britain.. so that india can have its own constitution, flag and special provisions. It was granted Independence through the Act.

  • @ranjnasandeep
    @ranjnasandeep 9 месяцев назад +29

    Sibal feels that he can make fool any one

  • @spikes1210
    @spikes1210 9 месяцев назад +2

    Sibal. One man who is always hand in hand with anti-India forces

  • @LojiNeed
    @LojiNeed Месяц назад

    Constitution can be amended whenever necessary for safety of the country.

  • @kamathmanoj
    @kamathmanoj Месяц назад +1

    How is CJI allowing Seeballs to interrupt his own speech 😮 contempt 😡

  • @sairamsairam9890
    @sairamsairam9890 9 месяцев назад +6

    I hope S C will DISMISS the Application...

    • @paapkishtwaer
      @paapkishtwaer 9 месяцев назад

      what if they give verdict against the abrogation ?

    • @vikasgowda1391
      @vikasgowda1391 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@paapkishtwaerhell no, just see the cross questions by CJI to sibal. And even CJI know if he restore 370 then central govt will pass the bill in both houses easily because if any opposition goes against it then it will be a death of their own in upcoming elections.

  • @drsubashn4025
    @drsubashn4025 9 месяцев назад +22

    SC has made it clear in its famous judgement that parliament has the power to amend the constitution or enact laws without affecting the basic structure of the constitution. Then why can Art 370 not amended or abrogated or deleted by the parliament? Removal of Art 370 does not affect the basic structure of the constitution !

    • @vishalbharti1139
      @vishalbharti1139 9 месяцев назад +1

      Due to the presence of the explicit process on the removal of Article 370

    • @drsubashn4025
      @drsubashn4025 9 месяцев назад +1

      @vishalbharti1139 can you please explain , sir ? That was an explicit process , otherwise, what other processes are available? Govt did not resort to the ordinance route. I am sorry I do not understand. .

    • @vishalbharti1139
      @vishalbharti1139 9 месяцев назад

      @@drsubashn4025 Sir,it was explicitly mentioned that the abrogation of article 370 can be held by the President but only on the advice of the Constituent Assembly of the J&K which Sibbal is arguing of.What the Union has done is through an implicit process,which is right in the sense and logic but a question on the process of abrogation of the article.

    • @aeonsleo2
      @aeonsleo2 9 месяцев назад +2

      The recommendation to remove 370 should come from constituent assembly because at that time jnk Constitution was not in place. Then Constitution came and elections and constiruent assembly was dissolved. So arguably the recommendation should come from legislative Assembly which wasn't there because of President rule. This isbthe argument.

    • @drsubashn4025
      @drsubashn4025 9 месяцев назад +1

      When J&K constituent assembly was dissolved and J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution , was the replacement not 100% ? How come some laws of Indian constitution were not accepted in to-to ? That's what one would expect. All provisions of Indian constitution were accepted and according to the same Indian constitution, govt of India and Indian parliament have the right and capacity amend any law without touching the basic tenets of the Indian constitution. I am not able to understand how some provisions were left out when J&K constitution was replaced with Indian constitution. . .

  • @theexposer9483
    @theexposer9483 9 месяцев назад +19

    During British time many Indian lawyers use to appear against Indians and one of them was father of j l Nehru. They made lot of money by going against Indians, the same breed of people are still practising even today. No country in this world will have such type of people thriving.

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw 9 месяцев назад +4

      In fact it is this batch of people who are now termed as liberaaaands!

    • @truthseeker327
      @truthseeker327 9 месяцев назад +3

      they are the lutyens gang or khan market gang. they are extremely intolerant towards those who do not belong to their ilk

    • @medasbabu
      @medasbabu 9 месяцев назад +1

      Sad part even after 70 years, we see people like Sibal thriving and given so much importance, he is a national shame.

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi 9 месяцев назад

      India is intact bcz of such great ppl not bcz of RSS rioter

    • @PC-tz6rw
      @PC-tz6rw 9 месяцев назад

      @@deepakkumarjoshi I can bet you are the devil's advocate!
      Very unlikely that your ID is real. The new law which has been presented in parliament will definitely make life miserable for such a lot , which passes opinions as judgements and truth. Very soon, if you shoot off the hip, even in courts, you'll have to come up with evidence and hearsay will not make a dent on judgements. That goes for fake news and concocted news too!

  • @idharmatdekhbhai11
    @idharmatdekhbhai11 3 часа назад +1

    CJI is andhbhakt sar

  • @surendr3645
    @surendr3645 9 месяцев назад +2

    Between 1956 and 1994, 47 Presidential Orders were passed without any Constituent Assembly but the Order removing 370 without such an Assembly is a problem

  • @thankcode
    @thankcode 9 месяцев назад +2

    Kapil Sibal was our Law minister once, what a shame for the country.

    • @rameshchandrasahoo8872
      @rameshchandrasahoo8872 9 месяцев назад +1

      When khangress is out of power and no remote in its hand that time India is bad boy

  • @vasudevannagaswamy7068
    @vasudevannagaswamy7068 9 месяцев назад +7

    Akanda Bharat is following sanatana dharma. Every devoted hindu should wake up from slumber and hear what Kapil Sibal is arguing. Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and all states should follow what is practised from immemorial times. Vallabhai Patel and Ambedkar was not fir article 370. Article 370 has done so much harm to hindus and particularly Kashmiri pandits.

  • @rockyvillan562
    @rockyvillan562 9 месяцев назад +6

    If it's temporary it's temporary.
    What's the difference then if it's permanent ??

  • @shankarcg786
    @shankarcg786 9 месяцев назад +3

    When in 1976 the word secular was introduced when half the parliament was in jail that was not violation of constitution 😊

  • @rishavsingh2356
    @rishavsingh2356 9 месяцев назад +5

    Remember Sibil is mp of RS from SP which is part of I.N.D.I.A and he is in court for restoring Article 370.

  • @sundareshkrishna6457
    @sundareshkrishna6457 Месяц назад

    CJI rocks……awesome sir…🙏🏿🙏🏿

  • @anandnairkollam
    @anandnairkollam 9 месяцев назад +6

    How does the hon judge have so much time for such cases but not for common man's cases?

  • @pankajshah9094
    @pankajshah9094 9 месяцев назад

    One can doubt the integrity and honesty of the Supreme Court of India. People will not have faith on such system.

  • @maheshnag944
    @maheshnag944 9 месяцев назад +4

    कृपया हिंदी में subtitile डालें ताकि हम हिंदीभाषी भी देश के जिम्मेदार लोगों के अनुच्छेद ३७० पर उनके विचार जाने

  • @phoneix_bicycle_garage
    @phoneix_bicycle_garage 9 месяцев назад +2

    I really respect CJI who duely have opportunity to restarin and even with can make a joke using his power as CJI but still was in control to respect his senior as it was a court proceeding for the matter of fact...hats off to personality and emotional control of CJI...
    And I believe as citizen of India..that our constitution and judicial system may be attacked or poisoned by politics of the present situation but still it will stand for the conscience of Indian citizen his rights ...

  • @bluesailengineering5003
    @bluesailengineering5003 9 месяцев назад +6

    CHAPPAL IS GOOD AT BAIL ONLY. HE HARDLY WINS ANY CASE.

  • @mitron7588
    @mitron7588 9 месяцев назад +6

    4:47 really he is saying that temporary is not part of A370 😂😂😂

  • @vaghelas4719
    @vaghelas4719 9 месяцев назад +6

    Some body must challange "secualr word" Introduced in Constitution by Indira Gandhi during imergency on similar ground

  • @kamathak
    @kamathak 9 месяцев назад +2

    Sibbal is clueless.. He is just wasting court's time.

  • @hemantmallapur
    @hemantmallapur 24 дня назад +1

    If Sibal is Devil's advocate who is the Devil?

  • @somashreechowdhury2382
    @somashreechowdhury2382 9 месяцев назад +5

    Particular Officer of the SUPREME COURT is of the FIRM CONVICTION that ..."I am the Supreme law , I am the Supreme court Department of Telecommunication, Governm

  • @sarojjena9947
    @sarojjena9947 9 месяцев назад +12

    CHAPPAL IS CONFUSED OF HIS OWN EXISTENCE AS A BHARATIYA. . . . . .

  • @amitavadas7533
    @amitavadas7533 9 месяцев назад

    We have fullest faith in this Constitutional Bench headed by Hon'ble CJI

    • @anshulthakre8987
      @anshulthakre8987 9 месяцев назад

      Don't so easy bro
      Aapne hi dhoka diya karte hai

  • @kuldipsharma3119
    @kuldipsharma3119 9 месяцев назад +2

    Very good discussion.

  • @vipstervipster5002
    @vipstervipster5002 9 месяцев назад +2

    Stop wasting courts time, send Kapil Sibal to Pakistan. Let us close the matter of 370 and solve the evil intent of Kapil Sibal.

  • @777-Movies
    @777-Movies 2 месяца назад +1

    What the Hell , Congress want 370 ?

  • @satishreddyparpelly
    @satishreddyparpelly 9 месяцев назад +1

    People like sibble
    No need any other enemy for our country

  • @prashantrathod6418
    @prashantrathod6418 9 месяцев назад +2

    What is Mr.Sibbal's or for that matter ANY Indian lawyers'interest against the abrogation of 370 ??
    This defines logic ...
    The MAIN achievement of this case will be that the abrogation will get the stamp from the Supreme Court hence this problem will be settled for posterity... Well played GOI and SC... 👏

  • @haqeeqat256
    @haqeeqat256 9 месяцев назад +1

    Great discussion sibal

  • @Lakshyam9
    @Lakshyam9 9 месяцев назад +1

    6.38 _ CJI nails it. The 370 was a temporary provision brought in- the Constituent Assembly of J&K could have made it permanent. They didn't , while agreeing to acede to India.
    Assembly dissolved.
    370 remains a TEMPORARY providion, NEVER made permanent.
    Case closed.
    Bye Sibal.
    Sibal has no case.

  • @jagbhushanjagbhushansingh2111
    @jagbhushanjagbhushansingh2111 9 месяцев назад +1

    Sir plzz 371 article apply in j&k state and restore statehood 🇮🇳 371 article one nation one flag 🇮🇳 and one savidan

  • @utsavgoel8254
    @utsavgoel8254 9 месяцев назад +3

    Who pays for sibbal's fees...is it the Congress party ?

  • @aryanraj-jp5nu
    @aryanraj-jp5nu 9 месяцев назад

    Smart move by Dalal Sibal . He knows how to deal with people. Challenging court is actually telling court to put in effect Article 370 .

  • @SomTugnait
    @SomTugnait 9 месяцев назад

    Indian Parliament amended a law for the good of entire country.. Period...

  • @kingjulien3511
    @kingjulien3511 2 месяца назад +1

    CJI argument are way better then SG.😂... seems CJI took charge of SG

  • @bhakarism
    @bhakarism 9 месяцев назад +1

    If assembly consent is mandatory then how did Telangana get carved??

  • @ganeshsubramani3072
    @ganeshsubramani3072 9 месяцев назад +2

    So long as we have politucians with vested interest and selfcentered objective than in the wekfare and development of the country, people as like Sibal, Abhishek , Rahul, Arvind etal shall continue to thrieve and keep the country under unreat at all times

  • @ghosh9903
    @ghosh9903 9 месяцев назад +1

    Why Mr Sibal confusing CJI ?

  • @hemantkumardwibedi5187
    @hemantkumardwibedi5187 9 месяцев назад +1

    Who paid him his remuneration

  • @sidharthsanyal4243
    @sidharthsanyal4243 9 месяцев назад +1

    Shame we are discusing this even now

  • @manithiruvengadaamy8491
    @manithiruvengadaamy8491 9 месяцев назад +2

    Kapil Sibal has to accept the tutorship of the CJI as you always claim the Judiciary is supreme

  • @kv8724
    @kv8724 9 месяцев назад

    Are we not going round in circles?? Sibal is a shame on him mother. Seriously do people have the time and money to go through this nonsense

  • @jagannathsutar2841
    @jagannathsutar2841 9 месяцев назад +2

    They have lots of free time

  • @jayaramhn8950
    @jayaramhn8950 9 месяцев назад +1

    Whatever may be the arguments J&K is one state among the other states of India. There were Maharajas in all other states also. Democracy is now the King of India. J&K must be treated at par with all other states. It needs no special status. Hyderabad Nizam did not wanted to join Union of India. What was done then? Same applies to J&K also. Article 370 must end. This is the opinion of more than 80% of the people of India.

  • @peacekeeper9840
    @peacekeeper9840 9 месяцев назад +1

    Waste of taxpayers money.
    Some issues are above law and thats why wars are fought.

  • @unknownisbest
    @unknownisbest 9 месяцев назад

    This is a fixed match to remove public perception that Chandrachud is Sibbal’s 24/7-on-duty peon!

  • @sanaullahalom2253
    @sanaullahalom2253 9 месяцев назад

    Every argument of mr. Sibbal ji was brilliant and it is easy to understand without kashmir assembly Indian Government don't exist ... And all their decision is invalid also because president is not a kashmiri

  • @bhabanishankar3096
    @bhabanishankar3096 9 месяцев назад +1

    मैं दोहराता हूं कि कोई भी जम्मू-कश्मीर में धारा 370 को दोबारा वापस नहीं ला सकता

  • @sheoran56
    @sheoran56 9 месяцев назад +1

    Sibal :- _Law Kya Hota Hai, Anti India Kaam Karne Hai To Bol_

  • @ketanpatel-wu3ds
    @ketanpatel-wu3ds 9 месяцев назад +6

    Only a selfish lawyer would argue so vehemently for overturning the decision on abrogation of Article 370 which has brought peace to Kashmir and given human rights to the downtrodden segments of Kashmir. Disgusting.

  • @paritoshpanigrahi455
    @paritoshpanigrahi455 9 месяцев назад

    The entire nation stands with Modi Ji in the issue of Article 370.

  • @jyotiranjan_hindu_21
    @jyotiranjan_hindu_21 20 дней назад

    Since the Constituent Assembly of J&K was dissolved, there is a provision which says J&K state legislature will be taken as the Constituent Assembly which can pass or ammend laws. At the time of abrogation, the J&K State Legislative Assembly was dissolved and the legislative power was transferred to Parliament of India by the laws of our Constitution. That's how Parliament worked as the Constituent Assembly of J&K. Simple.

  • @AKumar-ce6qf
    @AKumar-ce6qf Месяц назад

    What a situation, we have to fight for our own state. Pappu and team wants to see bharath divided

  • @gauravnathan5701
    @gauravnathan5701 9 месяцев назад

    CJI DY chandrachund is so clear, he is the real protector,,, he is really a justice

  • @jagannathsutar2841
    @jagannathsutar2841 9 месяцев назад +2

    This party is going to free itself from the country.

  • @nirmalk8861
    @nirmalk8861 Месяц назад

    If Sibal is fighting a case, then it must be the wrong side

  • @avnitchaudhary3528
    @avnitchaudhary3528 9 месяцев назад

    Supreme kotha of India