2024 Ford F-150 2.7l vs 5.0l Coyote vs 3.5l Powerboost MPG loop

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 245

  • @ril850_1
    @ril850_1 7 месяцев назад +29

    If I needed an everyday no frills truck. I would buy XLT with a 5.0. Simple and reliable.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +4

      100%% FTW

    • @Bronco2Cj
      @Bronco2Cj 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@CTECH-REVIEW The XLT with the 302A pkg, sliding rear window, 360 camera, adaptive CC are all standard correct?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      @@Bronco2Cj My understanding is that is correct!

    • @Mrbink01
      @Mrbink01 4 месяца назад +3

      5.0L was ruined in the 2018 model year and beyond. My 2018 was nothing but problems with oil consumption and a clunky transmission. When they went to dual and port fuel injection with a sprayed on cylinder liner, they ruined that motor. My 5.0L on my 2013 was flawless.

    • @302Mustang13
      @302Mustang13 4 месяца назад

      3.5 Ecoboost is also very reliable. It would be the engine I'd choose but it's not available in a regular cab with 6 1/2 foot bed. 5.0 for me since it's available in the regular cab.

  • @mickeybrumfield764
    @mickeybrumfield764 7 месяцев назад +33

    All very good engines and all good fuel economy for a full-size crew cab pick up. I'll go with the 5.0 and the added payload that it offers.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +3

      Heck ya!!

    • @tboe-cr8pz
      @tboe-cr8pz 6 месяцев назад +7

      Negative. I’d go with the 3.5 EB. The 5.0 wasn’t originally designed as a truck engine whereas the 3.5 was. Also the 5.0 now has cylinder deactivation and we all know how that’s going with GM….

    • @na4valve
      @na4valve 6 месяцев назад +5

      @@tboe-cr8pz from a reliability standpoint 5.0 > 3.5

    • @Thedoors432
      @Thedoors432 6 месяцев назад +9

      @@tboe-cr8pz”I don’t want to buy a similar product because a certain manufacturer built/designed it poorly”
      Makes sense.

    • @mcmuskie2563
      @mcmuskie2563 6 месяцев назад +1

      I have a 2021 3.5 with 110,000klm on it. I tow a lot, Boats,ATV, Snowmobiles..it’s been a great engine.
      Tows so well, I just ordered the Platinum with the 3.5 if I take it easy heading north with no trailer i average 10.5-11 per 100klm
      Great power and gas mileage!

  • @burntvirtue
    @burntvirtue 7 месяцев назад +9

    I like a lot about your videos. Maybe more than any other vehicle review channel on RUclips. This content provides a service for sure, and you're straightforward, right to the info, and you speak like a real person. Lots to like. Thanks.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +1

      I appreciate that!! I put a lot of effort into the channel, thank you for watching! more good stuff to come!

    • @kevinmay4198
      @kevinmay4198 7 месяцев назад +2

      Ya I'd agree with that. His videos are good.

  • @ThenewguyYT
    @ThenewguyYT 4 месяца назад +10

    Had a 2.7 in my last 2 trucks, Went to the dealer and picked out my 5.0 yesterday and im so happy. Nut i wont lie, I test drove a 3.5 poweerboost and thats one hell of a truck too

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  4 месяца назад

      thats awesome, how were your 2.7ls for you? Any problems? Why did you go to the 5.0?

    • @ThenewguyYT
      @ThenewguyYT 4 месяца назад +1

      @@CTECH-REVIEW I loved my 2.7 no problems at all, Fast, good on gas. I went 5.0 because I just wanted something "new". When i went from my 19 to my 21 with the 2.7s I felt like i was just driving the same truck again

    • @coreysharp9794
      @coreysharp9794 Месяц назад +2

      That wild, I did the opposite. Traded my 19 5.0 xlt in for a 24 2.7 xlt.

  • @richardisaksen9366
    @richardisaksen9366 7 месяцев назад +10

    These are the reviews I like, all legit no BS. What was the rear in the 2.7?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +4

      Thanks for the comment! I think 3.55...standard ratio!

  • @JeffFoster-s5v
    @JeffFoster-s5v 7 месяцев назад +10

    I just bought a powerboost and love it.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +1

      That is a great powertrain!

  • @brandonmacon3317
    @brandonmacon3317 Месяц назад +3

    All i know is the 21-23 headlights look so good. Im glad the red trucks were on either side of the blue one.

  • @davewilson8308
    @davewilson8308 5 месяцев назад +5

    Love my Powerboost with the 7200 watt onboard generator. I power my house and camper with it. You are so right with the transmission, sometimes I can’t even hear or feel shifting.

  • @oscarrubio2476
    @oscarrubio2476 7 месяцев назад +9

    I own a 2015 XLT with a 2.7L and it's at124,000 miles. Had one issue since new with a fuel pump (warranty), otherwise solid truck. I don't tow 15,000 pound trailers on a daily basis, but I have no issue pulling my 23' Robalo at highway speed several times a month or taking a classic car to a show. The previous truck was a Chevy with a 5.3, great as well. Key to any vehicle is religious maintenance, especially oil changes. It's really personal preference and what you do with your truck.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Great comment! Thank you for sharing and watching my video! I am a fan of the 2.7l!

  • @jrk1990
    @jrk1990 7 месяцев назад +18

    Loving my powerboost, just got it two weeks ago, carbonize grey with black out package plus, my first truck. Had cars all my life.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +4

      Awesome truck, congrats!

    • @jrk1990
      @jrk1990 7 месяцев назад

      @@CTECH-REVIEW thank you! 😄

    • @sethalos
      @sethalos 6 месяцев назад +1

      I just bought the same truck color with black out pckg myself. Got the Lux package and a few other things. What an amazing truck. I should say it's my first full sized truck I was in a 17 Tacoma Trd.

    • @jrk1990
      @jrk1990 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@sethalos I’m loving it, especially coming from a ford fusion lol

    • @michaelfrohn255
      @michaelfrohn255 4 месяца назад

      Congrats bro! Just got my 24 lariat, love it! I would be happy with the xlt, but my wife drives it most of the time. She doesn’t know when to use 4 wheel drive. So unfortunately I have to pay more so she can put it in 4wd auto. A feature that GM has on lower level trucks. Ford needs to make it standard on all xlt+ models!! I seen a major price increase, but lost a lot of features from my 2024 vs my 2020????? Not looking good for the truck market imo!

  • @slmjake
    @slmjake Месяц назад +2

    Great video! I wanted a used 21 or 22 supercrew with 6.5 bed and four wheel drice and XLT MID with heavy duty payload package or HDPP. Never found one used in the layout i wanted. Ended up with a used Powerboost in XLT High and more options than i would have liked.
    40k miles now and mostly highway at 75 to 85 mph where allowed and about 20% around town. Only towed a couple of times and off road less than 100 miles total.
    MPGS to date...21.5.
    Likes...power is incredible and i powered my house 3 times during extended outages of 1 to 3 days. Also XLT High is a very comfortable truck. Love the big towing mirrors and led lights etc.
    Dislikes...dismal payload of 1360 pounds means i cant put in a used 6.5 foot slide in pop up camper. I am not a fan of 20 inch rims, moon roof etc. Wish i could have a power fold for mirrors.
    I would trade this truck for a used F150 HDPP equipped one if it had the right options.
    Otherwise, i will drive this fast and fuel sipping beast till it breaks.
    I wouldn't buy a powerboost for mpgs but more so for camping and house power as it does those tasks very well. If you do lots of city driving a Powerboost is a great choice.
    To me a 3.5 or 5 l are what I would go with for truck camper and best fuel economy laden and lower engine and tranny temps with a 3.73 axle if you can find them.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  Месяц назад

      Great comment! Thanks for watching. Very nice truck!!

    • @gregchiropolos9885
      @gregchiropolos9885 21 день назад

      Simjake I am looking for the exact same truck but Ford doesn’t seem to want to build one.

  • @texandy89
    @texandy89 7 месяцев назад +3

    The awesome feature with the Poweboost is the 7.2 kilowatt inverter system is a awesome feature you can run some of your things in your house from the truck if you lose power in your house

  • @mikezahnow1605
    @mikezahnow1605 3 месяца назад +3

    2023 with 4 thousand miles on it I found and bought it. 2.7 in it, plenty of power and driving 65 I see 28 mpg quite often, not always.

  • @donw2105
    @donw2105 Месяц назад +2

    I have it all with my 2022 XLT Sport with the 5.0. I drive combined city/highway and get 21.5mpg. Yes, I drive mostly in Eco Mode. That is because I put a flow through muffler and S&B Cold Air Intake on it. Mine has NO ENGINE STOP- START BS because it was made during the Covid chip shortages. Very happy about that. Sounds savage and gets it's power NATURALLY with ZERO effort. Say what you want...if you cram a lot more pressure into an engine to get the same power...it IS harder on the engine.

  • @TheHighschoolpranks
    @TheHighschoolpranks 4 месяца назад +2

    I just traded in my 2016 2.7 lariat with 165k miles very reliable and powerful little engine. But my new 24 f150 5.0 XLT is so much more fun and nice to drive. Best driving truck I’ve ever owned

  • @AK_Ray
    @AK_Ray 6 месяцев назад +8

    Another thing to note, that 5.0 has a 3.73 rear. If it had the 3.31 it would probably be the highest... Simply amazing

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching. I need to go back and look I thought all the trucks had the exact same gear ratio

    • @jerryshobbies8224
      @jerryshobbies8224 5 месяцев назад +4

      yup, the 2.7 had 3.55 gears, the other two were 3.73. Also, regarding payload, the 2.7 had 6600# GVWR, the 5.0 had 7200#, and the PB was #7400.
      As an RV owner, I need high payload, that 19xxlb payload on the 5.0 was exciting... LOL. plus, my daily commute (~100 miles round trip) I would rather have the 5.0. However, for RV life, having the PB with the 7.2kw in the bed is tough to pass up.

    • @slmjake
      @slmjake Месяц назад

      ​@jerryshobbies8224 i agree sir. I love my Powerboost but isn't intend to buy it. Would still prefer a heavy duty payload package truck though but very tough to find a 21 or 22 XLT Supercrew with the options I want in a used truck. Very sad that Ford stopped making them in 23.

  • @ZYXWVUQ992Q
    @ZYXWVUQ992Q 2 месяца назад +1

    i just bought a 24’ 2.7, i agree the shifting is rough, especially when the trans downshifts to a stop at a red light. i notice from time to time a big clunk when the truck approaches a stop.

  • @jeffallbright4449
    @jeffallbright4449 2 месяца назад +1

    15K mi on our 3.5 powerboost. We tow a 5th wheel travel trailer occasionally which is why we bought this truck. This powertrain torque down low is really impressive and empty fuel economy is outstanding, 27-28. Having 7200 watts of power on board is awesome. In town is where the hybrid fuel economy shines. We drove this truck all over Tucson for 5 days and made it 800 miles on a single tank of fuel. Ford knocked it out of the park with this truck!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  2 месяца назад

      I agree! Thanks for watching, and nice truck!

  • @longranger5226
    @longranger5226 2 месяца назад +1

    Owned a 2016 XLT with a 5.0 litre. All I ever did was put gas in it and routine maintenance. Sold it 8 years later with 130,000 miles on it. Never had a moment of trouble with it.

  • @ryane6719
    @ryane6719 6 месяцев назад +14

    I test drove a power boost. The fuel economy(after a mix of city highway driving) was no better than the regular 3.5. The 2.7 smokes the power boost for mileage, if you’re not towing super heavy, get the 2.7.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад +1

      2.7l is alwsy a great choice!

    • @poppyneese1811
      @poppyneese1811 6 месяцев назад +2

      No over coming physics, I’m a 2023 2.7 owner and yep with a 5k+ pound camper in tow, my mileage drops down to between 12 and 14 mpg’s, but unloaded I easily see 21.5 in the mountains of Southern West Virginia. Maybe Ford has improved the MPG calculator, but mine is always more than 1 mpg over what I’m actually getting, so I always hand calculate mileage.

    • @ryane6719
      @ryane6719 6 месяцев назад +3

      @@poppyneese1811 12-14 isn’t bad with 5k plus that wind resistance factored.

    • @reddawg9400
      @reddawg9400 6 месяцев назад +1

      Power boost shines with city driving

    • @wreckitmech306
      @wreckitmech306 6 месяцев назад +2

      If you are maintaining 65 and under, the PowerBoost will outshine the normal 3.5L. There are folks getting 800-1000 mile range tanks. How much more is the 2.7l getting?

  • @Reshard834
    @Reshard834 6 месяцев назад +6

    5.0 vs 3.5TT in an F150 is always a tough choice. I probably would choose the 3.5 twin turbo ecoboost

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      It sure is a tough choice

    • @Freedomjustice-DC
      @Freedomjustice-DC 2 месяца назад

      Yep. I went with the eco boost in2022 just for towing my travel trailer

  • @noosh8316
    @noosh8316 7 месяцев назад +4

    Very cool video comparing all 3 trucks with the different powertrains. I also appreciate how all 3 trucks were within $2000 of each other on the MSRP. True apples to apples comparison. If it’s my money, I’m going with the 5.0 V8 and as an added bonus you would get the best payload number of the bunch!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you for the comments! I tried to compare as close as equal as possible! Huge bonus is pay load with 5.0l!

  • @wasupfool5692
    @wasupfool5692 6 месяцев назад +10

    2.7 is way better on fuel, but id go with the 5 litre although i did love my 2.7. It always got around 4 or 5mpg better than the 5 litre and the 3.5

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Did you have a 5.0 also? What year? 4 mpg is a big improvement!

    • @mclroy
      @mclroy 6 месяцев назад +1

      I've got a 2015 3.5. Loved it. But i bought a 5L in 2021. No regret. She's a Lariat. 1692 pounds payload. And what a great roar. Don't have to worry a out the turbos. My friend had a 2016 3.5 and he has to change both turbos at 120,000 m.

    • @mkyhou1160
      @mkyhou1160 6 месяцев назад +1

      I went from the 2.7 to the 5.0. Fuel economy is worse, but the engine is a lot nicer. It’s smoother, matches better with the transmission (less jerky) and sounds amazing.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад +1

      @@mclroy I have a 2.7 and I don’t worry about the turbos either

  • @evancontos2267
    @evancontos2267 Месяц назад +1

    Nicely done sir!! 😁 Only problem it made the decision even harder, LOL. Mileage vs. 2.7 folks love vs reliable V8 vs. generator on wheels vs. heart loving V8's with dual exhaust!!! 😜

  • @nunya1667
    @nunya1667 2 месяца назад +1

    I recently purchased a ‘24 STX 4x4 with the 5.0. It’s currently in the shop getting some cosmetic issues taken care of so I’ve been driving a loaner STX with the 2.7. While I can’t really complain about the 2.7, the driving experience is 10x better with the 5.0. The 2.7 will get up and go, but you really need the boost from the turbos so it feels like you have to get more on the throttle. The 5.0 just feels to take far less effort to achieve the same acceleration. I’ve yet to really stretch the legs on the 5.0 on a long drive but did get 23.8 mpg on a 45 mile highway drive cruising 73 mph the day after getting it which is right on par with Fords rating. The added bonus of the 5.0 is the beautiful sound of its exhaust. Something the 2.7 will never have.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  2 месяца назад

      Great comment. Thanks for giving that perspective. Nice truck by the way ! You will probably like a video. I’m going to post here in the next few weeks about a coyote.

  • @darrentoth7165
    @darrentoth7165 7 месяцев назад +5

    Thanks for the awesome video!! Knowing that there is only a 1 mph difference I will definitely going with the 5.0! Waaaaay more to go wrong with the ecoboost and not to mention the cost to replace the battery on the Powerboost! Keeping my next truck for many years so going with the reliable coyote!

  • @bimini99
    @bimini99 2 месяца назад +1

    Excellent Vid. Love those trucks except the exterior. They look so basic. Doesn't look at cool as the competition these days. I'd love to see them come out with a 5.0 V8 with powerboost. Having the generator is a huge additional feature specially for folks in Florida with hurricanes. Having the A/C compressor be electric is awesome. Can keep the car cool when the engine is not running. In Florida when Power goes out we can use the truck and not have to worry about having a separate generator. I'd love to see it in a 5.0 V8 configuration.

  • @billys4446
    @billys4446 2 месяца назад +1

    you mentioned a little rougher shifting in the 2.7L when both have the same 10R80 transmission, that can all be reset- or programmed out, dealer can adjust the shifting from the software, that particular truck you were driving probably just needed reprogramming(Adjustment)

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  2 месяца назад

      Very true great, thank you for watching

  • @Bwanar1
    @Bwanar1 5 месяцев назад +2

    To be fair, the middle one (with the lower payload) didn't have the 3.73 gears the other 2 did. With that, it should have similar if not greater payload.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 месяцев назад

      Great comment! More to come on these comparison reviews!

  • @westhavenor9513
    @westhavenor9513 6 месяцев назад +4

    I wouldn't pay more than $45k for any of them, so I guess I'll keep my 2003 and go on a cruise ship vacation this summer instead :)

  • @garycarter5641
    @garycarter5641 6 месяцев назад +1

    The PowerBoost engine is the 3.5 ecoboost engine with an electric motor added between the transmission and engine. Ford could not get rid of the 3.5. For this reason.

  • @marvinjacobs2955
    @marvinjacobs2955 17 дней назад +2

    5.0 for reliability and longevity

  • @thankyou9085
    @thankyou9085 7 месяцев назад +6

    5.0 the only truck with true work capability, high payload and towing capacities, 5.0 V8 is the best

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Thank you for the comment

    • @halhoose4456
      @halhoose4456 6 месяцев назад +1

      The 3.5 is actually the highest towing capacity with power and torque at a much lower rpm than the 5.0. Both are great engines.

  • @PhoenixChaos
    @PhoenixChaos 6 месяцев назад +5

    Just picked up a 2024 STx and I gotta say, the interior has to be the nicest entire for a near base model of any vehicle
    It’s insane

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      I agree! Enjoy!

    • @PhoenixChaos
      @PhoenixChaos 6 месяцев назад

      @@CTECH-REVIEW Not a fan of the neon yellow fender flare tho!

    • @georgeupham7524
      @georgeupham7524 6 месяцев назад

      I'm picking mine up on Monday. 5.0l.

    • @actontreadway1168
      @actontreadway1168 6 месяцев назад

      @@PhoenixChaos blackout package removes that.

    • @PhoenixChaos
      @PhoenixChaos 6 месяцев назад

      @@actontreadway1168 Yea well I didn’t get the blackout package bud lol And I’m not buying it after the fact
      I’ll figure something out

  • @furiousgtz
    @furiousgtz Месяц назад +1

    It's the Drone deactivation cylinders sound on 5.0 normal

  • @dmandman9
    @dmandman9 Месяц назад +1

    The 3.5 without the power boost has the most towing capacity. It's actually higher than any of the other engine choices including the 5.0

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  Месяц назад

      That’s. Great point. And put the new ford performance tune on it and have more power than the 3.5 ho engine!

  • @ts9271
    @ts9271 6 месяцев назад +3

    You forgot to mention what gearing each of the trucks was. Im really impressed with the 5.0 mpg. With how high the payload was im thinking it was the 3.73. Same with the PB as 3.73 is standard. Curious about the 2.7. Great video.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Sorry I should have included that, I think it was in the window stickers, let me confirm. But I believe all 3 had identical gearing.

    • @AK_Ray
      @AK_Ray 6 месяцев назад +1

      2.7 has 3.55 gears in the vid.

  • @MidnightAspec
    @MidnightAspec 6 месяцев назад +1

    Great review, thank you for the information. I'm currently renting a Powerboost version (courtesy of Enterprise), while my car is in the shop. I was never into pickup trucks and have never been in the market for one living in suburban NJ. However, as Enterprise only had this, a Ram pickup (hate Chrysler products) and a Corolla available for rent, I figured I'd give the F150 PB a go. Though I've only had it for less than 12 hours, I'm amazed that this thing as actually more fuel efficient than our 24 MDX SH-AWD. Needless to say, we may look to add this to our 'fleet' within the next year or so.

  • @lonnieopp8198
    @lonnieopp8198 7 месяцев назад +8

    60 grand for an XLT piss off

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching!

    • @Brandon_Nelson92
      @Brandon_Nelson92 6 месяцев назад

      You'll see them for 10k+ off msrp soon. Buying a new truck will (almost) make sense again, like before 2021.
      My 2019 stx f150 had an msrp over 47k. I paid 35k, which was only 1k less than the advertised price. You'll be seeing new xlt f150s back in the upper 40k range before the end of this year unless the government interferes with the trajectory of the car/truck market.

  • @austynscruggs6867
    @austynscruggs6867 6 месяцев назад +6

    I thought the newer 5.0 has issues with the cylinder deactivation?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      I’m not aware of that, but I will look into that. Thank you for the comment.

    • @TheRR-pv9pl
      @TheRR-pv9pl 18 дней назад

      They don’t have cylinder deactivation that’s for the Chevy’s

  • @tewksburydriver8624
    @tewksburydriver8624 7 месяцев назад +7

    2.7 will do better overall than the 5.0. Highway is highway, most driving is city or around town so the 2.7 will beat the 5.0 in the long run in terms of MPG's.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +1

      ya that makes sense! Thanks for watching!

    • @jasonbrushett2005
      @jasonbrushett2005 7 месяцев назад

      And the PowerBoost will beat both in city stop and go

    • @nickschaps4022
      @nickschaps4022 6 месяцев назад +1

      Not sure about that, turbos dump a lot of fuel at hwy speeds. I have a Chevy 2.7 and it does really great in the 55-65mph range. But 75+ mph and it’s pretty bad, like 14-16mpg. My ‘13 f150 with the 5.0 gets 17.5mpg at 75mph.

    • @scupking
      @scupking 6 месяцев назад +3

      The 2.7 is a great engine.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад +2

      @@nickschaps4022 the turbos don’t “dump” a lot of fuel at 75mph, I drove 1300 mi on a trip at that speed and got 24.4, 25.6 mpg. Ford f150, 2018, supercrew, 2.7. Maybe that’s the way chevy is set up, but not my ford..

  • @motofunk1
    @motofunk1 7 месяцев назад +6

    Need a Powerboost Raptor !!!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Get ready....ford has a Secret coming!

    • @markwangontario7573
      @markwangontario7573 7 месяцев назад

      That heavy battery pack will be happy flying 😂

  • @bradboyd883
    @bradboyd883 3 месяца назад +1

    When you gave the payload capacities you didn’t mention the GVW each truck… Because that gives you the actual weight of the truck.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  3 месяца назад

      Great point. I will discuss that in future videos

  • @michaelthayer6995
    @michaelthayer6995 4 месяца назад +1

    Here is a question I cannot answer myself online! I see the 5.0 in the video with the 19xx lb. payload only has the tow package and NOT the max tow package. What components would the max tow package have added to the truck and would it have reduced the payload some? Build and price doesn’t always tell you what the packages include. Thanks in advance for your answer!!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  4 месяца назад

      Thanks for watching. Typically max tow gets you a higher GVWR rating, the 9 3/4 inch rear axle, a beefier rear spring pack and higher GAWR!

  • @jrlaymance
    @jrlaymance 3 месяца назад +1

    Don't get the low mpg #'s, My 14' F150 SCREW 4x4 Platinum 3.5 would get 21 before I lifted it and put 35's on it @35k miles

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  3 месяца назад

      That’s great fuel economy. Lots of variables when doing an mpg run

  • @qazqaz-kp1xj
    @qazqaz-kp1xj 13 дней назад +1

    i am following the channel and a new subscriber. I would like to buy a 2024 Ford F-150. There are two 5.0L V8 engines available in Saudi Arabia and a 3.5V6 turbo engine. Which one is better in terms of mechanical problems, less fuel consumption, and long-term service? I would love to hear your opinion and the opinion of the users.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  13 дней назад

      Wow great question and thanks for the sub! That’s a tough question. Both engines are great in different ways. I think the 21+ 3.5 is legit. The new 5.0 seems decent too. If I did a lot of highway I would lean to the 5.0. For more city or heavy towing the 3.5

  • @Onyok.Bentot
    @Onyok.Bentot 5 месяцев назад +3

    Hi! I’m thinking of getting a used F-150 as daily work truck. I have a commute of 40 mile one-way (1.5 hrs) then another 1hr drive home in horrid SoCal traffic. I haul mostly network cabling installation equipment in the bed, and do not tow.
    What model year, engine and grade do you recommend? I would like to have some of the newer active safety features such as the automatic emergency braking system to avoid front collisions, but not as critical as long-term reliability and durability. Any suggestions for a late model
    F-150 with Direct and Port Injection. Also, what immediate and affordable engine and transmission mods for reliability and durability are recommended? I’m not looking for more power, just long-term reliability and durability as I don’t have too much money and need a truck for work and personal use. Thank you!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 месяцев назад +2

      Thank you for watching, I am a fan of the 2.7l ecoboost for fuel efficiency and generally a reliable powertrain.

    • @Onyok.Bentot
      @Onyok.Bentot 5 месяцев назад

      @@CTECH-REVIEW Thank you for your responding and for your advice! I appreciate your advice and help.

  • @ctfinneman
    @ctfinneman 19 дней назад

    Should come back with 10 years of age of these and make the same video.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  19 дней назад

      You will like a video I am doing soon on a high mileage 2021!

  • @waylinvanhalen
    @waylinvanhalen 5 месяцев назад +1

    5.0 all the way all day. Old school v8 and no hands free

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 месяцев назад

      Yes!!

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад +2

      Ha, this ain’t no old school v8, a hi tech mess is more like it.

  • @michaelthayer6995
    @michaelthayer6995 4 месяца назад +1

    Love the channel! I’m in the market for a new truck and your videos are very helpful! I’m also a Michigan guy living near AA. I pull a 7.5k lb camper about 6 times a year so payload is important. What is it that gave the 5.0 over 1900 lbs? A specific pkg or something? That’s the best payload I’ve seen on a 1/2 ton and I’ve been paying attention to that for several years. Thanks!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  4 месяца назад

      Right on! I think the 5.0 has a higher GVW and its a lighter weight powertrain.

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад

      @@CTECH-REVIEW if that was the case then the 2.7 should have a high payload rating, and it doesn’t

  • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
    @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 7 месяцев назад +4

    2.7!!!💪💪💪💪👌👌👌👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @andyd5492
    @andyd5492 6 месяцев назад +4

    5.0 Simple? It has cylinder deactivation which the other 2 do not. Another thing, dont believe the MPG readout. On throttle off coasting, the ICE only engines shut off the fuel. The hybrid helps when on throttle by not starting the engine.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you for the comment and for watching

    • @wasupfool5692
      @wasupfool5692 6 месяцев назад +2

      Cylinder deactivation is exactly why I wouldn't buy one now. GM and Ram have it and they're all basically the same design, expect a lot of lifter and camshaft failures

    • @Lq32332
      @Lq32332 6 месяцев назад

      @@wasupfool5692Cylinder deactivation being the cause is a common myth. The new 7.3 Godzilla has had serious lifter issues - no cylinder deactivation to blame. For the Hemi’s, it seems more related to VVT. Overall it seems like a higher volume oil pump would help more than anything else.

  • @Travisj9935
    @Travisj9935 5 месяцев назад +2

    The 2.7 obviously. My 2022 F-150 2.7 Stx on oem 33's gets almost 27 mpgs @ 65 with A/C on. I was blown away by that. I'm not sure why yours is so low. Mine was gps/odo & top off method proven. Right off the lot brand new. Although I drove 100 miles home. Your drive is way shorter

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 месяцев назад

      2.7l is awesome engine. My top pick too!

    • @JamesOMalley-hb4tf
      @JamesOMalley-hb4tf Месяц назад

      I can get 27 mpg out of my ram 2500 Cummins driving at 55 mph too. 😂

  • @kieefjr57
    @kieefjr57 4 месяца назад +2

    These were all 4WD? Why not a mpg test with the 2WD?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  4 месяца назад

      All 4x4. I would be happy to do a 4x2 but not easy to find them where I live.

    • @JamesOMalley-hb4tf
      @JamesOMalley-hb4tf Месяц назад

      Who would waste money on a new truck and not get four wheel drive? 😂

  • @jacketprideable
    @jacketprideable 7 месяцев назад +1

    Were the axles all the same and where’s the eco?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      They all had same ratio axles and all of them ran in ECO mode! Thank you for watching!

    • @jdl1276
      @jdl1276 7 месяцев назад

      @@CTECH-REVIEW the 5.0 had a 3.73 the 2.7 had 3.55 and the powerboost had a 3.73

  • @jasonbrushett2005
    @jasonbrushett2005 7 месяцев назад +2

    I'm curious, what was your actual distance of the test loop? How much was highway and how much stop and go?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Great question. The loop I do is about 17.8 miles. 70% highway.

    • @jasonbrushett2005
      @jasonbrushett2005 7 месяцев назад +1

      @CTECH-REVIEW I'm sorry but an 18 mile loop is not enough for an accurate fuel consumption test imo.Atleast 50 miles with a considerable portion of stop and go would be ideal

  • @musicovermyhammond9994
    @musicovermyhammond9994 6 месяцев назад +2

    All the engines are good. So that’s not of any importance to me. You can’t go wrong with any of them. What’s more important to me is the chrome appearance package with the shifter on the column which I have on my 21 XLT 302A package. Ford has now taken that away from the XLT and has made it to where you have to step up to a lariat which I refuse to do because of the shifter placement being in the counsel area. I will be keeping my 21 until they bring back the chrome grill to the XLT.

  • @nolanchance2364
    @nolanchance2364 3 месяца назад +1

    Do the 2024’s have bluecruise 1.2 (with auto lane change) or still 1.0?

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  3 месяца назад

      Great question let me look into this. Thanks for watching.

  • @chrisoneill4211
    @chrisoneill4211 7 месяцев назад +3

    The one with less moving parts

  • @tomtraynor5384
    @tomtraynor5384 4 месяца назад +1

    I'd wait for a V.2 Powrboost--at least.

  • @poppyneese1811
    @poppyneese1811 3 месяца назад +2

    Not knocking any of these engines, my 2017 2.7 had a 3.55 rear 20.4 mpg and 6 speed, my 2023 has a 2.7 3.73 rear with the 10 speed and I’m getting about .60/ 21 mpg, better with the 3:73 rear. Pulls my 4,600 pound camper a lil better, but the 10 speed ain’t as smooth. I’m a Grandpaw and I’ve always driven like one, even 40 years ago.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  3 месяца назад

      Thanks for the comment and for watching!

  • @glennv5906
    @glennv5906 3 месяца назад +1

    This is not an accurate test. You can’t go by the tucks computer for accurate mpg calculations? You have to use a calculator and refill each truck after your loop. You’d find the onboard computers are very inaccurate. The rear’s also make a huge impact 3.31 vs 3.73 etc….

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  3 месяца назад

      Hand calculated is always best. The powerboost and 5.0 both had 3.73 gears. 2.7l had 3.55 gears. Feel free to check out the rest of my channel. I had some videos comparing different gearing mile per gallon loops with the 5.0.! Thanks for watching!

  • @purepower333
    @purepower333 6 месяцев назад +1

    Where’s the powerboost

  • @larrysayers1377
    @larrysayers1377 Месяц назад

    More of sales pitch than an actual real world gas comparison

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  Месяц назад

      Thanks for watching. I appreciate your comments. I will keep that in mind for future comparison videos. I don’t work for any dealerships so I’m just trying to share my insights.

  • @rogercabello918
    @rogercabello918 6 месяцев назад +3

    How does the lightest engine (2.7) have the lowest payload

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      most 2.7l engines get the 6600gvwr where as the 5.0 gets a higher GVWR.

  • @patrickdempsey8343
    @patrickdempsey8343 6 месяцев назад +1

    I don't think the Power Boost F-150 is a good idea in places that have extreme heat or cold, which is basically all over the place. That battery adds weight, complexity & a higher price tag & will not really do it's job in extreme climates. It does seem like a good idea as an overland truck for camping & stuff with all of it's outlets & things. I'm still sticking w/my 3.5L F-150 for now.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the comment!

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад

      Nobody has ever mentioned the cost of the replacement of the batteries in the powerboost

  • @64special300
    @64special300 5 месяцев назад

    Rear end ratio different on 2.7

  • @almayberry538
    @almayberry538 6 месяцев назад +2

    A majority of people don't want small motors in full sized pickups!!!

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for sharing

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад +3

      Is that why the smaller engines outsell the v8’s? Yup the majority 🙄

  • @mclroy
    @mclroy 6 месяцев назад +1

    The gear number are no longer display?

  • @tim1823
    @tim1823 7 месяцев назад

    interesting - was it 4x4 or 2wd

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад +1

      all 3 of these trucks are 4x4, but the tests were all conducted in 2WD! Thanks for watching

  • @jw8578
    @jw8578 7 месяцев назад +1

    Same or different rear diff ratios?

  • @idontwantahandle231
    @idontwantahandle231 2 месяца назад +1

    All 15k over what they should be

  • @kona6451
    @kona6451 5 месяцев назад +1

    Conclusion: Get the Coyote duh.

  • @raytaylor9831
    @raytaylor9831 7 месяцев назад +4

    Anyone buying a full size truck and worrying about mpg doesn't need a full size truck. The 5.0 is the way to go for reliability and cost of ownership over a long time

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching!

    • @jasonbrushett2005
      @jasonbrushett2005 7 месяцев назад +4

      Nothing wrong with saving $$$ at the gas pumps whenever you can.I have a full size truck and given the cost of fuel today,a penny saved is a penny earned

    • @tboe-cr8pz
      @tboe-cr8pz 6 месяцев назад +2

      The 5.0 has cylinder deactivation. The 3.5 and 2.7 are more reliable than the new 5.0

    • @raytaylor9831
      @raytaylor9831 6 месяцев назад +1

      @tboe-cr8pz it does but is a much more reliable design than GM. Even with that it's more reliable for the long term than the twin turbo engines.

  • @jasonseiders3028
    @jasonseiders3028 6 месяцев назад +2

    You ran tge 2.7L at 70 on the highway the other 2 you ran at 69.
    I have had 2 - 2.7L, 2-P.B's 1 3.5L E.B. and 1 5.0L
    Only the 1 2.7 and 1 3.5 L had the 10 speeds and obviously both P.B.'s had the 10 speeds.
    That 1 mph on the highway makes a 1 mpg difference Drop that 2.7 to 69 mph and you'd be about 22 mpg's.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thank you for the comments!

  • @robertsamson7071
    @robertsamson7071 6 месяцев назад +1

    Why are u doing 70 instead of 69

  • @antonioreyes7126
    @antonioreyes7126 2 месяца назад +1

    11 miles to empty? Smh

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  2 месяца назад

      We got close! Thanks for watching!

  • @devincicrashjk
    @devincicrashjk 6 месяцев назад +1

    5l and 3.5L both had 3.73 gears. the 2.7L had 3.55 gears not apples to apples the 2.7L will run lower rpm and do better with that 3.55 ratio. the 3.73 is better for towing.
    lol then you compare a 3.7L hybrid real apples to apples lmao lol lol

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the comment. I will do another video with different gearing ratios once they get more in stock. I have done both in the past if you take a look at some of my 2023 reviews on these trucks.

    • @juan_f150
      @juan_f150 5 месяцев назад

      Most 2.7s come with 3:55s either way so this would be a fair test

  • @offthewallsurfer1
    @offthewallsurfer1 6 дней назад +1

    These trucks would be reliable if they kept their tried and true 6 speed, then they got rid of something good for a ticking time bomb of a 10 speed transmission. Also they have belt driven oil pumps, just another cheap part to have the truck grenade itself. Built Ford Cheap. Beautiful looking trucks but unfortunately beauty doesn’t translate into quality and reliability. No thanks 👎

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 дней назад +1

      I am not a fan of the belt oil pumps at all!

  • @fenceman53
    @fenceman53 6 месяцев назад +1

    Cybertruck wins

  • @terryhook5518
    @terryhook5518 6 месяцев назад

    All are slow

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching!

    • @cs1992
      @cs1992 6 месяцев назад +2

      Except they're not

    • @terryhook5518
      @terryhook5518 6 месяцев назад

      @@cs1992 lmao I owned everyone there slow kid

    • @cs1992
      @cs1992 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@terryhook5518 2.7L 0-60 is ~6.0s
      For a 5000lb vehicle, that's quick.

    • @JamesOMalley-hb4tf
      @JamesOMalley-hb4tf Месяц назад +1

      ​@@terryhook5518since when are trucks meant to be judged just on speed? 😂

  • @bill4632
    @bill4632 5 месяцев назад

    If you have a truck, you shouldn't be worried about gas. Skip the fecal boost bullshit. Just get the V8. #Done.

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  5 месяцев назад

      Thanks for watching

    • @Travisj9935
      @Travisj9935 5 месяцев назад

      Why? The 2.7 makes more low end torque. Tuned it makes 475whp on E85. The 5.0 can't get anything near that apples to apples

    • @pathunter7003
      @pathunter7003 2 месяца назад

      And have AAA on speed dial. Done

  • @orrettwhite-pw1ni
    @orrettwhite-pw1ni 7 месяцев назад

    Read the status from the factory, and it will tell you all you need to know, all this is a waste of time

    • @CTECH-REVIEW
      @CTECH-REVIEW  7 месяцев назад

      Thank you for watching!

    • @robertlandrum8598
      @robertlandrum8598 6 месяцев назад +2

      The 5.0 does the work gets decent gas mileage but sounds exactly what a truck needs to sound like. I actually enjoy driving it. So it’s the 5.0 for me!