Cops Get Sued After Arresting Him At A Prison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 мар 2024
- Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • NO BUENO ARREST, TORTU...
Body camera footage: • Shocking: Brutal Treat...
Auditing Reno 911’s channel: / @auditingreno911
Sources:
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.200- bit.ly/3wBNC27
Department of Corrections Visitation Manual- bit.ly/3V8W17n
AR 120 (News, Media Contacts and Press Releases)- bit.ly/3Tr97vA
Fordyce v. Seattle- bit.ly/43ffQfp
Irizarry v. Yehia- bit.ly/3vSNSGS
Askins v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security- bit.ly/3wK1SpT
ACLU of Nevada v. City of Las Vegas- bit.ly/3ItRx3I
Adderly v. Florida- bit.ly/3FtZ9BI
Pell v. Procunier- bit.ly/3v4QdBl
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 197.190- bit.ly/4a6SVVX
Stubbs v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department- bit.ly/3VquI95
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 171.123- bit.ly/49FZteo
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada- bit.ly/3nYdxIV
You canot come here wearing a blue shirt, followed by encounter with the warden ...wearing a blue shirt.
That lying ass warden prob was an inmate at some point lol
@@smokeykevin😂😂😂
@@RevofOne if you know you know 🤣
@@smokeykevin😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
a stranger outside the fence wearing the same color of the inmates vs. the warden who’s picture is in the prison and everyone knows on personal recognition and works in an office
I believe that officer later tried to get the judge to pull this video, and the judge ruled against him.
I think what they officer tried to pull in that court room speaks more negatively about him then this actually does.
How do you "pull" a video ? Did you mean remove it ?
I believe that in the court hearing the officer tried to claim the auditor was responsible to the actions of his viewers and under that claim wanted the judge ordered it removed from youtube.
Officer Bueno tried to get a restraining order because he was upset afraid of the comments made about him @ryanphillips4218
@@ryanphillips4218Yep, that's probably the first time he got his unprofessional actions on full display on YT.
You can tell that the warden is a product of law enforcement because of his ability and willingness to immediately LIE
He wasn't lieing. You can't walk around a prison randomly. It's one thing to be in town, but prisons aren't usually that close to the general public. Contraband had been found hundreds of time inside a prison that was thrown over a fense. He unfortunately FA in the wrong area and is FO
@@johnathan3328 He defiantly out right lied saying the suspect refused to ID.
yeah cops do out of line shit like that, not saying it's right. A decent, don't even have to be good, lawyer can beat that easily with the body can footage. Unfortunately him simply being on grounds with a highly sensitive facility and refusing to leave is against the law. Also him being there caused there prison to go into lockdown. That means correctional officers, who are considered police that don't have arrest capability, have to stop their normal job of dealing with inmates have to stop to deal with the over all security of the prison. Obstructing an officer of their official duties. You can also tell it was in fact a crime because he had to plea no contest in order to get it dismissed.
@@johnathan3328 He told another lie, saying the cammer didn't acknowledge him even tho the cammer was asking the wardens name repeatedly
That Part soon as he started talking I seen a snake
"you don't have the right to ask questions"⁉️ that one really got me💯😱
That should be an automatic F
OK Sparky, show me this right to ask questions.
@@alanmcentee9457 the first amendment, I can ask all the questions I want. He just doesn't have to answer them 😱🤷💯👍😎🪖🇺🇸
@@alanmcentee9457 You're funny. I am assuming your comment is a sarcastic joke? If not, oh dear.
@@GoToPhx
So you can't show me this "right" you support.
I can only assume you aren't the brightest bulb in the NFG box.
"oBsTrUcTiNg" is what they say when they don't have a sufficient basis to arrest you on.
Well they had him on Trespass it's just cops default to obstruction because just like how this auditor doesn't understand Trespass laws, most cops don't understand obstruction laws. It's a symptom of the blind leading the blind.
Obstruction, Resisting, Disturbing the peace...and I feel like there's maybe one more they like to use.
Notice how they do their investigation after they arrest him 🙄
Yep that or interfering
Oh, YT ghosted my comment. I'm so surprised! I listed a few things they like to use in this situation. I guess that was too many keywords and upset the AI. Maybe I can just list one? Resisting is another they like to use.
Im kind of shocked the prison doesn't have a private way sign.
I bet they'll get a gate after this incident
Common sense!
Because it’s public property
A quick google search shows that the public access/easement goes several hundred feet into the road that he was on. The houses across the street need to be fenced off as well, because they can see the entire prison from their windows.
If this guy was disrupting prison operations, they are extremely delicate. Also, flat out liars, with a strange perspective of what actually happened.
Probably would need one since people lack common sense.
"I'll identify myself as clearly as you articulate the charges against me."
How about that.
Bingo
He meant to hot box that guy....no doubt in my mind.
And he gets a C? That cop couldn’t care less about that man. He only cared about the blue line gang loyalty. But he still gets a C
It’s a real bummer that this channel will never assume that which we already know
Yes. Cop almost kills a senior citizen and AtA gives him a C.@@kerim7469
@@mackswellgg not really. that's not this channels job
Hot box? Like he wanted to get him in a car and burn one wit him with the windows up?
In Nevada -- and every other state -- no one has to provide ID to the warden.
Right😂 I was wondering why the cop was entertaining the wardens claims about the filmed not identifying himself. Sorry warden but outside of that prison you really don’t matter
Except for when in any state where the warden is a sworn law enforcement officer.
@@ericcastle380his jurisdiction is the prison.
Peace
**edited typo
@@ericcastle380 even if he is a "sworn peace officer" he still can't stop & ID people. My husband was a deputy jailer and he was a sworn peace officer and he didn't have the right to stop and ID people outside of the jail. And neither does the warden.
@@jillianhall1594 Not just outside of the jail...but also on PRISON PROPERTY...which he was.
They just pulled failure to identify out of thin air lol
I’m surprised they didn’t insert “resisting” along with it.
The warden just lied
The courts are very clear.
Not cooperating is NOT obstruction.
It can very well be
That's not the case in every circumstance.
When you don't do what is REQUIRED by law when you are under arrest, it's obstruction.
@@pugnessnobody asked him to identify.
it can be
Those guys just wrote that guy a check and they don't care. This is how we waste taxpayer money.
What do you mean they just wrote him a check?
He's not likely going to win the court case lol. If he does, he's not winning much.
He was trespassing, he refused to leave upon an officer's order and the only thing that the cops did wrong was hotbox the dude. But given the lack of interaction between the officer and the criminal the cop has plausible deniability. Especially given that conversation in the station, it seems like the criminal didn't think to bring up the temperature during the 30 minute drive. I'm sure defence are going to bring that up if he starts crying about how cruel it was. If someone's suffering, surely they'd speak up about it.
There was a false charge thrown in there with the failure to identify leading to an obstruction charge. But the arresting officer can't have expected a prison warden to lie. That charge would get dropped, but nothing will happen to the cop for it and it's not likely the state is going to pay up much if anything over that.
Nah I doubt they are going to write that guy a check. They did rather good in this minus the warden lying. And given that the arresting officer conducted himself well, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
If anyone's wasting taxpayer money it's that fool who trespassed and ignored officers warnings to leave. He's going through court proceedings for what? Wasting taxpayer dollars for what? What did he expose here besides a Warden saying the wrong thing once. That criminal auditor is truly wasting taxpayer money. Auditors should know the law otherwise they're just a part of the problem.
He's not getting any $. Charges dropped at best
@@bakersmileyfaceYou can't trespass on a public easement.
@@j.t.3798 The charges were dismissed. I’ll top of that he’s already filed the lawsuits against the officer for false arrest etc. On top of that the officer tried to silence Reno 911 first amendment right to upload videos the officers behavior etc through a restraining order he filed against Reno 911. The TRO was denied of course because it would violate the 1a. Also Reno 911 has already returned to the same prison and did a walk around the publicly accessible places and recorded without any issue since his arrest. He has a very good chance of winning his lawsuit. Especially because of the hot boxing. There is a special vent that supposed to feed the back cabin with air using a hose that runs to the back that hose was removed and redirected so it would blow directly on the officer.
@@bakersmileyfaceI guess it’s really going to chap your ass to find out that he’s already did a revisit to that same prison and recorded in publicly accessible places without being harassed by officers or the staff.
The arresting officer is a piece of shit who tried to silence Reno 911’s first amendment right by filing a restraining order against him for uploading videos about Bruno to RUclips exposing him for the tyrant he is. In court Bueno lied and perjured herself multiple times. Even with all of Bueno’s lies in court his restraining order was still denied. During court the piece of shit officer even allude to the fact that he’s trying to get criminal charges brought against Reno 911 because of his videos he’s publishing on RUclips.
15:01 did anyone ask him to ID at all? No.
Ok, let's get him for failure to ID. 🤦
Typical pig behavior.
“I just asked what was his name and he refused to acknowledge me”
They also got him for trespass and obstruction.
“You’re obstructing our investigation by not identifying”
No I’m not. Put a little effort into it instead of just asking me for my ID. By your logic, I’m obstructing your investigation by not incriminating myself by admitting I’m breaking a law.
"How, specifically, does seeing my ID tell you if I have committed a crime or not, Officer?"
Say to cop: My ID is not evidence of a crime.
In other words, lazy policing... "Do my job for me, or I'll arrest you," incompetent "law enforcement," if you ask me.
@@darrenconway8117absolutely 💯
"C" for almost inducing heat stroke potentially death?
Benefit of the doubt given the officer's reasonable demeanor during the rest of the encounter.
It also appears that within the half an hour drive, the auditor didn't mention the temperature.
He gets an F! Period. He’s clueless to the constitution and a disgrace to the badge.
RIGHT!!!! I unsubbed straight Garbage
He needs to be arrested for hot boxing him... that's unacceptable
No, it's SOP
it did seem that nobody had a problem with him filming, but his presence alone was what they where not allowing.
No trespassing signs are wonderful things
@@shanecorrigan8524no no trespassing signs are even better
He's wearing blue and was told it's the prison issue color, plus prisons are privately owned. If the warden doesn't want you there, you gotta go, most prisons aren't state owned. State funded is different. He's clearly trespassing.
@@shanecorrigan8524don't need one if you are told to leave
@@DoctorCataclysm we will see in court
Not giving the warden an F is a huge mistake on your part. He lied to get 2 extra charges
How about the cop hotboxing his detainee? It's against the law to leave a child or even a dog in a hot car, but according to ATA that's a "C" for breaking the law, policy, and acting "recklessly and dangerously" SMFH
@@LucasJackson_37he wasn’t hotboxed he was sweating like that bc he was walking in the heat, the cop had the air conditioner on. This guys a frauditor.,they were very good to him. Watch the whole video, and not parts of what someone chooses to show.
@@LucasJackson_37👢👅
@@bambilacknerSo… if he was sweating like that from walking in the heat, then spending over 30 minutes in an “air conditioned” vehicle should have acted to cool him down and dried up his sweat… right? 🙄
Go what the guys RUclips channel the cop never turned the air on untill he got into the car.
The warden, who I’m sure has the job because he’s the very best warden they could find, treats the videographer like an inmate. The cops get together to come up with something to charge him with. None of them bother to check to see if he actually did anything. Then, of course, a little hot boxing to top off the day. How can we be anything but proud of these professionals.
Super disgusting, right?
Policing is not a profession....
Professionals are required to have years of training and degrees in their respective fields...
Being ignorant of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights while claiming to be a professional in law enforcement is proof that you aren't a professional. 😂
Back the Blue, Until it Happens to You!
The videographer was not supposed to be there and was trespassing. The warden additionally is not a part of the sheriff's office and not a police officer (probably has policing powers, but not the same exact ones), warden didn't really owe him any sort of treatment like identifying himself or whatnot, warden told him he wasn't supposed to be there, and he remained there, and then the warden from that point turnt to the cops to deal with everything. Not really the warden's fault, guy shouldn't have trespassed. He didn't deserve to be hotboxed, but the rest is merely the videographer's fault here.
I wonder if he got a "rough ride" too.
5:11 It's a public road, not a restricted access road that is closed to the public. There's an auto shop open to the public at the end of the road.
Well it depends. There auto shops in air ports too however they arent't open to the public and you need clearance to even get in. As it's a jail. I'd imagine is simply a repair bay for emergency vehicles.
@@robertrogers6021 there isn't an auto shop in airports. There are mechanics and there is a bay but a shop means you can do business there. So if there is an autoshop it's public but it's possible you're correct and it's just a bay. No signage would allow a reasonable person to believe they could go there
Even if the guy was wrong, and there is no public property at where he was taking pictures from, what I don't understand is why cops are still not trained to de-escalate? The first guy was refusing to explain anything or to even talk - he just barked orders like a derailed robot. All the other ones even though were less power-hungry, still failed to explain anything. Like a simple explanation - hey man, you are wrong about this being a public property and we don't have to have the "no trespassing" signs by the XX state law could probably resolve the whole thing and the guy would just leave. No, lets gather the whole county worth of cops and try to make a huge fucking deal out of this.
@@algalkin "The first guy was refusing to explain anything or to even talk"
whats there to explain besides what he said"you're trespassing, now kindly fuck off" there literally nothing to explain he was told to leave and he didn't its that simple..
"Obstructing the flow of BUSINESS here" prisons are a business, not correctional facilities. Empty beds don't pay the bills.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who caught that line.
The word business does have other meanings.
To be fair they did say they had to go in lockdown. If I was a cop or a warden and some dude was taking pictures of a prison and not leaving when told I’d assume he’s trying to help someone break out. Hence why they had to go into lockdown, which obstructs the flow of the day to day life in prison, making the prisoners more upset and more likely to act up, could cause some searches or extra monitoring, making more work for the guards. So id say that’s obstructing the flow of business. Maybe not in the common form but business can also refer to day to day stuff. He did then charge him for obstruction but I’d say that’s not connected from what I saw and also how it was explained
@@RussTheTuss i will say this is a great take/ perspective that i didn't consider. & specifically pertaining to the idea that he could be "scoping" the place, in an attempt to help an inmate escape. in return they were placed on lockdown, & most likely for an hour+....... while i do support auditors & love what they do - i don't think audits should be performed at a prison/jail at ALL! it seems pointless, & most members of the public won't/don't visit jails. AND phones/cameras are always prohibited anywhere near inmates + inside the jails [that i know of] ...
(im so upset this my third time retyping my content bcus ads keep popping up & removing my text😫 i literally just shed a TEAR)
All these problems stem from police not being held accountable personally for their actions. Not likely to change until that error is corrected.
And the auditor not fully understanding the applicable laws and court precedents.
@luciddream2033 That's like you totaling your car but focusing on one of the scratches. 🤣🤣
@andydhillon1977 the auditor was completely in wrong. Why do you watch these videos if you completely ignore all of the matters of law that are explained.
As explained, the restrictions on filming are constitutional and the property was under control of the corrections facility.
He was told to leave and didn't. That is trespass after warning.
@@luciddream2033two things can be true at once.
@brkbtjunkie yes, they can, unless those two things are opposite statements. They can both be false statements, but both can't be true.
In this case, the auditor is wrong about filming and trespassing, as they regularly are. The cops were correct. The accountability of police had nothing to do with the legalities of that. If the cop intentionally held the person in a hot car as a form of torture, the cops needs to go to prison.
Funny how, when it comes to property rights the state will gladly do what it needs to protect theirs, yet when it comes to your property rights….
It’s a prison facility, those green fields are where prisoners work. You go towards that prison, yes, they want to want to know what you are doing and can tell you to leave.
@@danporath536looks like the guy got paid out, which means he did absolutely nothing wrong, they did. I hope you enjoy your life as a bootlicker
@@danporath536why would they be working outside with no officers around on a publicly accessible road?
@@bobthetitanic
If he wanted to drive through on the road he could have, he chose to stop and walk towards the prison. They had security concerns and told him to leave under the law….he refused.
In other words "despite intentionally torturing someone, we still give him a C"
I strongly disagree.
The fact AA grades citizens based on their demeanor makes me not take his grading system seriously. I don't have to be kind to pigs.
So you assume the officer did it on purpose. That can get you sued because you are stating it as a fact without any kind of proof that it was done intentionally.
The officer even states on record that he thought the AC was on.
So no just because the guy claims something doesn't make it true, and you stating it as a fact can get you in legal trouble.
i'm not sure but i think the officer is a liar, and i could be wrong but i think he's a coward and a tyrant too ! and i'm only surmising but i think he's a terrible person, i just get the sense that he's of low moral character ! @@lordvika2526
@@lordvika2526doesn't matter if it was on purpose... Accidental torture is still torture, tf is wrong with you
When cops try to be smart backtalking, they just sound even fuckin dumber
I like how they always interrupt people, the cop on the road, the warden, and the arresting officer all just would not let the guy speak.
Doesn't take much for them to look dumber.
However....
This you thinks he can just walk on to prison property and that they can't make him leave unless there's a sign up and the police are the dumb ones? I think not.
@@lazydaisy2292Yes you’re right. But they acted like idiots by not letting the stupid guy speak.
A big F for the cop just for the hot box
It’s not a surprise that this bootlicking channel gives a cop a C for leaving someone in the back of a hot cop car.
Yep 100 percent.
Bro we can literally see the temperature gauges at 17:47. The car is set to low and you can hear the AC blowing.
@@Extem1 so he was sweating through his clothes for no reason
@@legionjames1822 Well no, obviously something made him sweat (a panic attack for example) but I'm inclined to believe the car over him.
Failure to ID when nobody asked? Is funny how this kind of cops looks to find for the most charges they can come up
Prime example of You can beat the charge but your not gonna beat the Ride!Hotboxing in Nevada! If a regular Citizen did that to a dog they'd get Jail!
Should have called him a whaaaambulance. I'm sure you have the number.
@@User0000000000000004bait 😂
@@User0000000000000004okay boot licker
@@User0000000000000004 How dem boots taste? Probably like 💩 right?
@@lilyvmax6642he's not bootlicking dude
"I am a law enforcement officer in Nevada...but I have to call ANOTHER cop to enforce what I think the law is..."
Some officers are not granted arrest or investigatory powers. Jailers usually fall into this category. So do parking maids.
Pathetic
@@bobbykennedy3636 a prison is not "private property", and the place where the PUBLIC parks to visit the prison is OBVIOUSLY public.
@@bobbykennedy3636
Can they demonstrate any actual claim of ownership of the property? The claim of ownership gets thrown around a lot but I'm not aware of any documentation of the state actually having ownership of any property.
And you are forgetting the principle of easements on the commons. And the officer was neither occupant nor owner.... Unless evidence can be furnished otherwise.
@@robertbarker5474 Not so obvious from a legal stand point. The general public does not come and go from there. Only the public with previously provided permission is provided access. The video cites case law which supports access on these terms very likely does not communicate general public access.
Leaving the guy in the car like that in the heat was cruel. That deputy definitely did that on purpose. Disgusting
I think most of them know an arrest for something like trespassing on a public road is not going to stand up in court. So they mete out the punishment themselves, effectively convicting sentencing and punishing the perp themselves. I didn’t write the law nor do I live in Nevada but I think it is fairly clear that by ‘facility’ they are referring to the prison, not the streets surrounding it.
They love to teach lessons
@@philipmarsh3522 correct. Not a single sign saying: "Warning: entering restricted area! You are subject to search, blah, blah, blah".
Nothing restricted about that road at all.
"That deputy definitely did that on purpose."
Ah, another commenter who somehow knows everything. Maybe it was on purpose, maybe it wasn't. You certainly don't know...so why say some DAF comment as if you do?
@@Batmann_the cops aren’t gonna date you, bro.
What a great looking crew of upstanding guys, sitting around the car trying figure out charges...homie looking like Kingpin with Prader-Willys...
When you get failing grades in highschool and no one will even hire you to drive a taxi or a garbage truck you can always get hired as a police officer
Yep it's good to know that I always something to fall back on LOL.
That looks like a publicly accessible road to me. Literally anyone can go through. The laws you cited pertain to the inside the facility. Just because it a prison doesn’t mean the whole place is secure. A lot of prisons’ parking lots are open to the public.
Yeah I don’t see how it’s reasonable to deny someone access to a road without any sort of signage or fencing
@@balmorrablue3130ATA are bootlickers.
Area 51?
It is not a public road though. Think of it more as a driveway to the prison. And they can certainly restrict access
@@kevinzink9063it is a roadway that is open to the public to use while conducting business. A journalist conducting 1st amendment activities is considered business. If you want to call it a driveway, it has to be marked as such
Cops not answering questions and saying they don't care what a person says after cuffing them and putting them in jail is disgusting
I don't really agree here. The cops should be willing to listen and answer questions in the field prior to arrest to dispel suspicion and resolve the incident peacefully, but after an arrest is made, their requirement to keep engaging is over unless there's more investigating to do. Once the arrest is made, it's best for both sides to let it go to court and not say something they will regret
@JKSSubstandard, Maybe...But arresting someone and "making up charges" is their M.O. and it will be until Qualified Immunity is abolished. They work under the assumption you are guilty of whatever they claim, regardless if it's lies.
Most cops are disgusting as are most government employees.
@@misters2837
Yes. Although claims are made otherwise, you are presumed guilty until you prove yourself innocent under the principle of military law in the current colorable court system.
@@JKSSubstandard Being kidnapped and not explained to the details as to why or being willing to discuss the charges to the person just foresters confusion, anger, and further distrust of armed thugs with a badge
More cops that don't know the law
They don't have to Know it
The Google Maps car went part of the way down that road. If the jail does not want the public on that road, I would hope they would make sure that is marked as private access road or that they would put a guardhouse at the road to ask people what businesss they have there with a sign that states only authorized visitors beyond this point. This situation was preventable.
It’s clearly marked as a correction facility…aka prison for prisoners. If you are walking near their perimeter, you will be told to leave. Those green fields are where prisoners work.
They're fine with people driving by. They're not fine with people remaining along the road. Simple stuff.
That is why he was not trespassing. That is public access road to the visitor center and according the prison faq you do not need prior auth to go to the visitor center.
Is that an assumption or a fact? No physical sign and no digital deterrent. @@danporath536
@@macheadg5er He wasn't going to the visitor center. He was parked outside a prison and filming. He was also asked to leave, which means he needed to leave.
My question on this one is would the warden be subject to perjury, falsifying an official document or falsifying a report for his statements that are blatantly false?
Just because you don’t agree with the arrest doesn’t make it false 😂 most of these people on this channel have a bias against ALL cops because their cop haters. Don’t be the stereotype.
@@NoonMightFacts. Tired of auditors acting like they're the arbiter of truth and therefore everything that doesn't conform to their view must be false
@@NoonMight Auditor is wrong for thinking he can go anywhere he wants even when asked to leave but the warden did make some false statements when talking to the officer. It seems they were within their right to trespass him but the way they explained the situation to the officer made things seem worse.
@@NoonMight Yes exactly and this is one of the few videos where I've seen more commenters call out this behavior. Usually these videos are just flooded with narrow minded people who have a strong bias and are unable to think critically.
Lol cop said “I didn’t interrupt you did I?” Um as a matter of fact yes you did per the handcuffs on my wrist and me in the back your your car ya dope
When you ask the county clerk for a GIS survey they play dumb and send you to 10 other people that play dumb so you never get a straight answer.
You say that like you know what an easement is. If you aren't working for a public utility, you have no rights to that easement, pal. Frauditors and uneducated people for some reason are unaware of what easements really are.
@@User0000000000000004easements are for anyone? Even if they aren’t do we ticket every broke down car?
@@User0000000000000004 or what about for simple walking? People should just be in the roadway?
Sucking on too many boots to think straight.
@User0000000000000004 I understand your point, but there is no cut and dry answer to that. Surely, there is an easement for foot traffic. Maybe even an easement to park a car. I believe the courts would use the standard of "common practice" as a basis of rueling.
@@User0000000000000004 The only easements that the public can not go into are ones that cut directly through a property. Misinformation bots are going crazy lately
How is outside a prison not considered a traditional public forum? I've seen plenty of demonstrations with dozens, sometimes hundreds, of people exercising their 1st amendment rights outside prisons (generally for/against death penalty).
They probably arranged the protest with the local authorities beforehand.
I don't know what it's like in the US, but I was a prison officer here in the UK and every protest outside of the prison we were breifed on well in advance and had extra staff during those hours.
Yeah I'm pretty sure it's like funerals. Or they have first amendment zones
Or they are further out from the prison, on the public roadway. The road the guy was on was NOT a public roadway. It was more like a driveway to the prison.
^this. If you watched it showed in camera him walking past the signed that told him that he was now walking on to correctional institution property. While he can get access to the property it comes with restrictions and certain procedures that have to be followed to be there doing what he's doing. From what i can see he didnt follow or mention that he had prior permission to be there. That would have put him completely in the right. Now i am not saying the other side was right either. What im saying is that when you do stuff like this you have to make sure your on point so that you have the best chance to walk away with your freedom and if need be have the legal ground to fight the case. Reading a law and understanding its application in real-world situations are two different things. That's where i think a lot of police, auditors, and citizens fail. They read (maybe) but don't understand. Hear, but don't actually listen and comprehend.
Sorry for the long rant lol 😅
"Sir, I'm on a power trip. I don't give a single fuck about your rights or any case law"
What rights?
He makes a claim about something that he can't prove in anyway.
He wasn't arrested for recording, he was arrested for trespassing.
Which is 100% valid.
Everything else is bs claims
@@lordvika2526Which is why his lawsuit has been kicked up to federal court.
He may have been wrong about some of it but he didn’t do almost any of the things they arrested him for.
He definitely shouldn’t have been out there on that road. You could look and clearly see that it wasn’t a normal road.
Were they supposed to drop everything and go study the cases before telling him he was wrong about what they said? He was asked to leave a place he wasn't supposed to be and stayed. He was incorrect about thinking he could be there and ended up pleading no contest as a result.
@@goodolbrad3No , they are enforcing the law, therefore they should know it!
@@mikedougherty2243 and they did... The guy was wrong. He wasn't supposed to be there.
There's more to this story when crybaby Bueno filed protective order because people were calling him. It was dismissed.
If you would have done that to a dog you would be in jail
You can’t legally sell puppies younger than 8 weeks due to separation issues for the mom but employers can require from a mother to show up at work 3-4 weeks after giving birth.
@@k.k.9571We live in a sick, Godless country.
@@k.k.9571 That's a voluntary arrangement. The mother doesn't have to go back to work if she doesn't want to.
@@k.k.9571
No. Just no. New mothers are protected under the Family Medical Leave Act. Firing someone for taking medical leave is a crime and a civil offense.
@@alanmcentee9457 😂😂😂
Aren't private roads, which the prison guard is claiming, aren't they supposed to be marked with some sort of "private road" sign? The road even has what looks like a legal speed limit sign of 35 MPH. As far as he knows he is on the side of a public roadway on the public right of way to the side. There is even another sign at the 10:00 minute mark stating "No use of tobacco products beyond this point." I would say that is the point that the prison is claiming it is private property. Even the Google Maps street view goes to just past the tobacco products sign. It really looks to me like he was on public property or at the least property that appears to be public.
The Carson City GIS maps, property # 01028146, show that the State of Nevada owns and controls the entire road up to the crossroad. It is not a public right of way. The fact that a Google car drove up and photographed it doesn't mean anything other than they photographed it. They also photograph many private parking lots and thoroughfares. That's a danger of using things like Google. Always use public GIS to confirm publicly accessible RoW's.
All of that said, it is indeed bizarre that they don't have the entrance signed as restricted access from the beginning.
Yeah it would be helpful to avoid this kinda thing, but the law says notification can be written or verbal. They chose the verbal route now have to pay thousands of dollars in legal fees for defense against a civil lawsuit rather than $85 to post a little sign. 😂
Some government property has private roads that they still allow the public to drive on like a public road. A state park near me does this for example. I assume the prison only makes it an issue if someone pulls over and stays on the road for a long period of time.
exactly and they could add more signs right at that tobacco sign but they can't because if right there they put a trespass sign then no one could get to the visitor center. That is why he was not trespassing.
They don’t need signs. You can be verbally notified in most states. The myth of the sign requirement has no basis in law. It does make things easier in opinion but, isn’t a legal requirement.
He was arrested for disrupting the flow of state business. It should frighten people how militant this is.
4:30 yeah "brought INTO the facility" not brought on the public road or public carpark outside the secury areas. I think you might have slipped up on this one bud.
Exactly my thought too.
"you don't have a right to ask questions"......???????
you have to listen to the first person who walks up to you and claims that they are law enforcement
Shouldn’t warden be arrested for a false statement. By saying the man declined to indemnify himself when he never asked??
The cops are allowing that warden to order charges off a menu.
this is wild and wicked
he was like, what other charges will you like to add to this
3:08 To paraphrase cops when they are told they are trespassing and to leave private property, "show me your ID and the deed with your name on it otherwise I have no reason to believe you have the authority to trespass me."
Ha. Good point but they are the ones with guns.
The Warden gets a F for lying about the identity charge, not identifying himself and no interest in engaging with the auditor, but willing to take time to ask multiple officers to 'collect charges' to use.
this is why so many of us think that police should be required to have at least a basic understanding of the law
Do you mean the understanding that the prison and its grounds are not a public forum and therefore you can't film there?
does the so many of us include the CONGRESS OF OUR REPRESENTATIONS?, OR THE SCOTUS OF BRIBED ACTIONS? SHOW WHERE IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION WITH AMENDMENTS THAT LEOS ON ANY COLOR OF LAW ARE MANDTED TO ENFORCE LAWS.
They know the law. They see themselves as above it, see : qualified immunity
Thats the problem, how can someone memorize just 1% of the million laws, and then these random prisons laws... Every year entire harry potter novels worth of laws are added. Isnt helping much.
@@chrish42000same way lawyers go to school to train for years. these people carry weapons and are supposed to protect the public but don’t want to invest a little time to do it safely and ethically?
This LEO would cite and possibly arrest a person for leaving a dog in the backseat of an SUV with the windows rolled up and in the sun on a 95* day, yet when he comes across a human he treats him like he did. What human garbage this LEO is.
If we could remove the ego from law enforcement, public confidence would go up along with officer career longevity. I get it, there is a type of person needed for law enforcement, as in an educated, stable, and emotionally balanced person.
But it's the Auditor's Ego that is the problem here. Prison's HAVE to be restrictive. The warden isn't joking when he says he has to shut the facility down for someone disobeying their order not to trespass. Which makes the Warden's Job INFINITELY more difficult, because they have to treat him as a possible threat, due to his unreasonableness and misunderstanding of Trespass laws!
What was his purpose of filming? Do I let randoms come film inside the Pentagon freely? There are reasonable limits. Its a prison, I don’t know if you’re a protester or a mobster collecting info.
Once we discover books we put down our fists. The educated do not make very good officers in this society.
It would help immensely if that were possible, but another large portion of the problem is how overpoliced we are and what is expected of police should be spread out over several other agencies providing community services and support.
We treat them as societal garbagemen, using them to round up the end product of things we dislike and don't want to deal with then funnel into our for profit prison system.
If we had an actual working social safety net we'd need less police and their jobs would be more straightforward.
@@darktheories1758🤣😂🤣😂 badge number 🤡
You must continue to sue to make a change...force the government's budget for lawsuits to get fully used. Not until you drain the budget will you see government's start to educate the tyrants!!!
As long as it keeps coming out of the public's pockets, suing does little.
Goverment doesn't pay the tab, the residents do. That's what taxes are for and why they raise them when shit goes south.
@johnwright7782 they set the budget yearly, they already plan for lawsuits. They don't care or want to stop it until it's a problem that they need more money for the lawsuits.
The problem is the general public are dumb and easily swayed…they keep voting to increase police budgets
And the money is coming out of taxpayers pockets
Are you serious.?
You give the cop a C for the obvious hot box 😂
ATA has become too much of a bootlicker for me
It's ironic that when you try to document people being put in cages they put you in a cage.
When he walked toward the visitor parking, it's like he stepped into a fire ant mound.
That road IS a public road and as Mr. Ribar demonstrates it goes to other places than only to the correctional building.
Totally agree. The fact that Audit the Audit is trying to defend a man getting charged for recording on an obviously public road is frustrating, as I've always respected this channel.
nonetheless, he was arrested in the private parking lot. This guy pushed it too far. Prisons are some of the most restricted non-military government buildings for a reason
@@zacharylovell9565I agree. Unfortunately he does this more often than can be considered a mistake. He’s a bootlicker pretending otherwise 👍🏻
@@r33thSo he said that he was documenting what visitors need todo when visiting. He had business there and he wasn’t trying, nor did he go into any restricted areas. They can’t make a public road or parking lot private to selective people. Other members of public are allowed in the areas that he was in. The only difference was that he was recording, which is a constitutionally protected activity. And the deputy didn’t even do a proper investigation, he only heard the, at best inaccurate, if not lie, statement from the warden. Then said to him that he failed to register as a visitor, well he wasn’t given a chance. He was accosted by the warden almost immediately. What a complete injustice this was. And some that are trying to make the hot boxing not an issue by saying that the man didn’t complain about it on the ride to jail I say, the video only shows about 10 seconds of that time. How would any of you know what was said in the edited out footage? And even so, that cop knows how hot it gets in the back of his patrol car in 95* weather.
@@mikedougherty2243 Listen.. I respect audits that are done properly & professionally. Not this garbage.
I'm not sure a sign on the side of a road with no gate, no private road sign, is sufficient. There's a McDonald's sign next to the road on the way into town from my house, I doubt any reasonable person would assume the road is privately owned by a corporate entity from mere existence of a non-traffic sign.
Editing all the different footage from different cameras and sources really shows how hard you work, great job as always
If only I could get a dollar for everytime I have to type these words: tyrants gonna tyrant
at 18:50 mark, officer shows no interest in learning the law - apparently ignorance of the law is protected by qualified immunity. Either we are equal or we're not - and if we're not, we've got a tyrannical government.
Ignorance is protected by qualified immunity, thus ignorance is encouraged in a way. But if you or I plead ignorance it’s not a defense. Go figure.
@@moxtheox471 And it isn't going to get any better with Supreme Court justices that are worried the 1st amendment might hamstring government.
If you have to ask permission, you're not free
They are such cowards. The prison warden, guards, and deputy. They were NOT on lock down for this guy. Don’t believe that.
You don't? I don't know what it's like in the US, but here in the UK 100% they would've been on lockdown for this kind of stuff. At least on a high grade prison.
@@bakersmileyface It's possible here in the states but it's more than likely that warden was lying, just like he did about the failure to ID. He wanted him arrested because he refused his guards orders to leave.
I think it's quite stupid that our government makes rules and laws so complicated that they don't even understand them themselves. And I hate it that these rich people get to make the laws and regulations for the rest of us. And I hate how the rich people get tax breaks constantly on their tax and their money.Well the poor people get taxed on no money.
The potential for using words to attempt to codify common sense is infinite... and makes no sense!
what's the alternative ? Anarchy ? No thanks@@brendandarkside1207
We don't have a government.
There are a bunch of service corporations operating for profit under the color of law.
Look up corporatism. We arent by definition a capitalist country anymore.
You really don't know how taxation works in this country.
At all.
Again, if this is a public road and a public parking lot that any citizen may park at, and they are not entitled to film there then a sign must state as such with appropriate connected laws and be visible to all at all times. Nevada apparently doesn't have these laws or signs. Well, that's Nevada's problem not the auditors.
Don't they always say "ignorance of the law isn't an excuse"?
@baazinga13 I still can't understand how the individual got a B+. He was an idiot, refused to leave after being told to do so on many different occasions. Thought the prison was public (when it's not). What a clown
When the career counselor asks a kid what their hobbies are and they say: "I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you"
They tell you to become an auditor
Recklessly endangering a citizen gets a C grade? That's pretty damn generous.
Who maintains the road that he was parked next to on the right of way ?
Not random members of the public.
Although America is a police state it somehow manages to not teach it's officers on basic civilian rights which often leads to lawsuits something incredibly common in North America society. This then leads to tax payers money, potential job loss, and an entertaining RUclips video. Rinse and repeat.
True, but there are so many bad auditors out there breaking the law and baiting cops that it makes all of them look bad.
Nonsense. We learn The Bill of Rights in 3rd grade.
Any rights that can be violated are not rights
@@joem1102 That's a really dumb comment. By that logic, any life that can be terminated, isn't a life. Crime happens.
@@Tijuanabill your opinion is noted, and disregarded
I wanna take a moment to talk about the part where he warned the guard about qualified immunity. It don't work for a jail/prison guard but, for reference when dealing with the police. Make sure to get it on film, ask the cop to look up specified case law. If the cop refuses to look it up, they can't use the excuse later in court that they didn't know they were violating your rights. That is how they get qualified immunity by claiming ignorance of the law. But, getting them on camera not looking up the law when presented takes away that "immunity." Then the individual cop can be held liable.
Police officers are not required to look up case law during an investigation, that's what the courts are for!!
All you need to do is put them on notice that they are acting unlawfully and why. You don’t need to film them looking it up 👍🏻
@@Bruce4lmighty Actually, you do. That is your proof. You have to show proof that the cop knowingly refused to look up the law. Otherwise, it's your word against the cops and we all know how that goes in a court of law.
i believe the prison runs an auto-body shop staffed by inmates and open to the public at the end of that road
The citation of laws pertinent to the incident is interesting, but the regulation says the Corrections Department gets to approve Cameras before they are brought INTO the facility, not TO the facility. The legality lies in interpreting what the rules and laws specifically say.
There must be a difference between the Public Road and Public Parking Lot even in the documents citing "Access to the Facilities/Inmates." There are Fences, walls, and doors that control access to the building and inmates. This differentiates them from the Roads and Parking Lots. As with other Military Bases, they can set up a Guard House at the road if they want to restrict access and they can post signs if they want to restrict photography.
The road was publicly accessible and I saw no designation that showed that the property was not Public.
There is a lot more to this story. The officer tried to file a restraining order against the auditor and failed. The auditor took a no contest plea bargain due to bad advice from his lawyer.
yeah sadly the auditor listened to the lawyer. He should have fought this one. Yeah he could still lose but I doubt it.
There is no more to this trespass he was legally asked to leave several times and this was not a traditional public forum. As a to a said very well auditors would do well to know the full law. State owned does not mean open 100% to the public and let’s just assume he never went to be prison website. Once the 1st corrections officer came he should have left. His hotboxing is bs unless he can prove it was done intentionally.
And you did hear he filed a civil case pro se meaning no real attorney would take it.
I always love that your analysis of the interactions and people grading are always fair regardless of if it's a popular grade or not. A lot of people would want the "government officials" to always get an F, but they are not always in the wrong. There are good officers out there albeit few and far between!!! Thank you for being fair.
Im glad you posted Drew's story this really needed to be done
Bueno Hot boxed that man on purpose. That cop was evil and deserves to be fired and in prison.
I agree 100%
Based on what? Your feelings? Why must there always be comments like this which make some "oh he 100%/Definitely did x" when you can't know that for sure? Commenters are always so confident in their based-on-0-facts assertions.
@@Batmann_ we'll know after the lawsuit.
Most cops are evil and sociopaths but the maga morons love these type.
@@stanleyhaskell8207 Unless the guy is going to openly just say "yeah, I did it on purpose", we'll likely never know...
Idk what you think the lawsuit is going to clear up. He may get charged with some type of negligence over it, which again proves nothing regarding his intent. It wasn't some super angry situation or anything.
What if he simply forgot? What if something was broken with the air system? Acting like your conclusion is the ONLY possibility whilst not even considering that there could be other possibilities is what makes stuff like this DAF.
Maybe it was on purpose, maybe it wasn't.
It appears, just like your sidewalk up to your door, that road is available to the general public. I think he needs a good lawyer that knows how to present and defend his case.
Yeah, but he was informed pretty much immediately that he was on the property and that the road was not a public roadway. That was the notice required by law. A "no trespassing" sign is only one of the ways to inform the public that access is restricted. The auditor chose to ignore that notice by incorrectly assuming the "no trespassing" sign was required.
“He thought the AC was on” suuuuuure. Just like the dude that thought an acorn falling was gunshots.
This is what happens when cops are not personally liable for being wrong.
4:26 - I'm going to nit-pick here.
The regulation says, "INTO the facility."
I was thinking the same thing
And he didn't want to visit the facility.
Previous case law has generally accepted that into covers the ground immedietly surrounding a facility
might "the facility" include the entire grounds under their control, similar to a homes curtilage
What's A&A?
Thank you for your channel and love all of your content! I am confused on one thing you said. You mentioned that he likely was not legally able to film on the property, however Long Island audit I see him go to correctional facilities all across the country and film in the parking lots with no problem. What is the difference?
ATA is wrong here
The fact the cop didn’t explain how the man was “obstructing” is hilarious to me.. 😂
And even if there are policies in place that restrict access via scheduling appointments. Those limitations are time place and manner. Even if he doesnt have an appointment he has a right to be anywhere the public would be allowed via appoinment. Excluding restricted access areas (via due notice or reasonable restriction). How are you supposed to connect with a custodian of records in person if the roads and parking lots are all "restricted access"? This just reeks of collusion between state agencies and rampant corruption.
The usual common charges that usually get thrown out. Obstruct, failure to ID, trespass.
He was on a public road? and in a public parking lot and thats why the charges were dropped.
Shame, Shame, Shame, these tyrants never gave this guy a chance to leave if he was being trespassed?
Idk man I feel like a "private road" sign could do the police a huge favor.
Hotboxing an elderly man and inventing a failure to identify/CYA charge out of thin air gets you a C? Old kinderhook, sure. Also, the law said “into facility”, not on the premises.
There's no "grading" in law enforcement, it's pass or fail. There's no grades for freedom
TBH, the idea that you can just walk down the side of a road abd unknowlingly find yourself trespessing absent any signs and nobody has any duty to show you evidence is completely ridiculous.
I have been a subscriber for the past 2 years. This is probably your best installment yet. Not for the entertainment value of police and public employees acting like children or criminals. For the work done to explain a very important part of your constitutional rights that will be invaluable information for auditors and people who are learning thr basics of. Protecting yourself FROM government
Tyranny. Thank you for
This I learned a lot from this
Here we go!
The narrator of this channel is like warm maple syrup
Right....and as the public YOU pay for it.
Not them
I'm sorry but 20:16 the deputy gets in the f. Like I can't wait for this guy to Sue this deputy.
You'd think prison staff would have a super solid understanding of how to properly deal with these situations. 😂
A guy walks up & claims to be a warden & says, 'Arrest him'... Just that easy to mess with someone!?
that's really crazy
@18:04
The police is listening to The Police.
I'm dead.
You know you're dealing with questionable intellect when they start looking for signs. Also, "no contest" is a guilty verdict, not a dismissal.
not exactly. He foolishly plead no contest to get a full dismissal. Yes I realize it is splitting hairs lol
No contest isn't exactly a guilty verdict. You're not accepting guilt and the court's haven't found you guilty. You're just accepting the punishment.
People often do this if they can't afford to fight out the court case and they offer a plea deal with the no contest.
@bakersmileyface But it's the same as being found guilty, you're just saying you don't agree.
Based on what they said that sounds about right and maybe it doesn't go on your record. @@Josef_R
@@thatkingdomheartsguy9615The only plea that doesn't go on your record is not guilty, IF you are acquitted. Anything in a plea DEAL goes on your record because you are agreeing to something the state wants.
"It's illegal to film over this line."
"Ok where is this line exactly?"
"Go ahead and put your hands behind your back."
Ata goes on and on about how government can limit filming on public property, yet fails to clarify how this public street is different then any other public street. Maybe he needs to look up the GIS survey to make his point. Without the clarification that the photographer was on DOC property then the street appears to be a traditional public forum. Based on the case cited, the street meets the 3 requirements for a traditional public forum. Public roadway accessible to anyone to use for traveling. I get that they may want to restrict filming of secure areas. Are they going to arrest everyone driving a tesla, or some other vehicle with a dash cam? If not, they cannot restrict access to a guy with a camera. Prison guards are not the brightest law enforcement. They typically barely made it out of high school. Being an affirmative action warden really doesn't look all that impressive.
100% I'm just going to block his videos